Telescoping effects and Telescoping effects and survey nonresponse in the survey nonresponse in the National Crime National Crime Victimization Survey Victimization Survey Michael Rand U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics UN Meeting on Crime Statistics Vienna, Austria January 25-27, 2006
14
Embed
Telescoping effects and survey nonresponse in the National Crime Victimization Survey
Telescoping effects and survey nonresponse in the National Crime Victimization Survey. UN Meeting on Crime Statistics Vienna, Austria January 25-27, 2006. Michael Rand U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Telescoping. Noninterviews. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Telescoping effects and Telescoping effects and survey nonresponse in the survey nonresponse in the
National Crime National Crime Victimization SurveyVictimization Survey
Michael Rand
U.S. Bureau of Justice StatisticsU.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics
UN Meeting on Crime StatisticsVienna, Austria
January 25-27, 2006
TelescopingTelescoping
National Crime SurveyNational Crime SurveyInternal and External TelescopingInternal and External Telescoping
6 month reference period
Forwardexternaltelescoping
Backwardexternaltelescoping
Month of
interviewInternal telescoping
National Crime Victimization SurveyNational Crime Victimization SurveyPeriod to period recountingPeriod to period recounting
6 month reference period
Date ofinterview
Date ofpreviousinterview
Incidents heldfrom previousinterview
Incidents helduntil nextinterview
Period to period recounting eliminates backward telescoping
Reasons for unbounded interviews in the NCVS Reasons for unbounded interviews in the NCVS Time in sample 2Time in sample 2--7 interviews, 7 interviews, 19951995--9797
16.6%16.6%TotalTotal
0.70.7Persons in units that are in samplePersons in units that are in samplefor the first timefor the first time
1.81.8Persons added to the household thisPersons added to the household thisenumerationenumeration
2.82.8Persons in households that were Persons in households that were noninterviewsnoninterviews the previous the previous enumerationenumeration
4.0 4.0 Person was a Person was a noninterviewnoninterview (in an (in an interviewed household) the previous interviewed household) the previous enumerationenumeration
7.2%7.2%Persons in replacement householdsPersons in replacement households
0.70.7Persons in units that are in samplePersons in units that are in samplefor the first timefor the first time
1.81.8Persons added to the household thisPersons added to the household thisenumerationenumeration
2.82.8Persons in households that were Persons in households that were noninterviewsnoninterviews the previous the previous enumerationenumeration
4.0 4.0 Person was a Person was a noninterviewnoninterview (in an (in an interviewed household) the previous interviewed household) the previous enumerationenumeration
7.2%7.2%Persons in replacement householdsPersons in replacement households
1995 Ratio 1995 Ratio TISTIS--1/ TIS2 1/ TIS2 Type of crimeType of crime
NoninterviewsNoninterviews
NCVS NCVS noninterviewnoninterview typestypes
Type AType A: : eligible household not interviewedeligible household not interviewed
Type BType B: : Address temporarily not eligibleAddress temporarily not eligible
Type CType C: : Address permanently not eligibleAddress permanently not eligible
Type ZType Z: : eligible household member in eligible household member in
interviewed household not interviewedinterviewed household not interviewed
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
Percent
Census Bureau Household Surveynonresponse rates, 1990-2003
NCVS: National Crime Victimization Survey CPS: Current Population SurveyCED: Consumer Expenditure Survey (Diary) NHIS: National Health Interview SurveyCEQ: Consumer Expenditure Survey (Quarterly)