v1.0 - 20050426 D ocum entC over Sheet ProjectN um ber PN -3-X X X X (leave blank ifunknow n ornotapplicable) D ocum entTitle Reportofm agnetic speech leveland S/N testm ethodsand resultsfordigital w irelessspeech and noise sources Source S. Julstrom (Etym otic Research);L. K ozm a-Spytek (RERC Telecom Access);and S. Isabelle (M otorola) C ontact N am e:Linda K ozm a-Spytek Com plete Address:G allaudet University, Technology A ccess Program ;800 Florida A ve, N E; W ashington, DC 20002 Phone:202-651-5676 Fax: 202-651-5476 Em ail: Linda.kozm [email protected]D istribution TR-41.N.n ForIncorporation Into TIA Publication X ForInformation Intended Purpose ofD ocum ent (Selectone) Other(describe)- The docum ent to w hich this cover statem ent is attached is subm itted to a Form ulating G roup or sub-elem entthereofofthe Telecom m unications Industry A ssociation (TIA )in accordance w ith the provisionsofSections6.4.1–6.4.6 inclusive ofthe TIA Engineering M anualdated M arch 2005, allof w hich provisionsare hereby incorporated by reference. A bstract The purpose ofthisexperim entw asto determ ine the rangesofuser-preferred telecoilm agneticsignal levelsand S/N ratios, according to the m easurem entspecificationsand criteria laid outin ANSIC63.19. The slidesdescribe the m ethodsand resultsofthe experim entin which digitalwirelessspeech and noise sourcesw ere used. Telecommunications Industry Association TR41.N.n-YY-MM-XXX
21
Embed
Telecommunications Industry AssociationTR41.N.n-YY-MM-XXX
Telecommunications Industry AssociationTR41.N.n-YY-MM-XXX. Test Plan 1 S. Julstrom (Etymotic Research) L. Kozma-Spytek (RERC Telecom Access) S. Isabelle (Motorola). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
v1.0 - 20050426
Document Cover Sheet
Project Number PN-3-XXXX (leave blank if unknown or not applicable)
Document Title Report of magnetic speech level and S/N test methods and results for digital wireless speech and noise sources
Source S. Julstrom (Etymotic Research); L. Kozma-Spytek (RERC Telecom Access); and S. Isabelle (Motorola)
Contact Name: Linda Kozma-Spytek Complete Address: Gallaudet University, Technology Access Program; 800 Florida Ave, NE; Washington, DC 20002
For Incorporation Into TIA Publication X For Information
Intended Purpose of Document (Select one) Other (describe) -
The document to which this cover statement is attached is submitted to a Formulating Group or sub-element thereof of the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) in accordance with the provisions of Sections 6.4.1–6.4.6 inclusive of the TIA Engineering Manual dated March 2005, all of which provisions are hereby incorporated by reference.
Abstract
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the ranges of user-preferred telecoil magnetic signal levels and S/N ratios, according to the measurement specifications and criteria laid out in ANSI C63.19. The slides describe the methods and results of the experiment in which digital wireless speech and noise sources were used.
Telecommunications Industry Association TR41.N.n-YY-MM-XXX
TEST PLAN GOAL: To determine the ranges of user-preferred telecoil magnetic signal levels and S/N ratios, according to the measurement specifications and criteria laid out in ANSI C63.19. Some additional information will be gained on hearing aid telecoil orientations.
Test Plan 1S. Julstrom (Etymotic Research)
L. Kozma-Spytek (RERC Telecom Access) S. Isabelle (Motorola)
ParticipantsParticipation criteria: • must be adults, • must be daily hearing
aid users, • must use the telephone
(rather than TTY or Relay) regularly for most of their calls, and
• must primarily use the telecoil mode of their hearing aids for telephone calls.
Participant characteristics (n=12):• Age range: 40-79 years old (8F,
4M)• Hearing loss: 1 mild-moderate, 1
moderately severe, 7 severe, 2 profound, and 1 didn’t know
• Hearing aid use: >10 yrs.• Age of hearing aids: <6 yrs.• Hearing aid style: 11 BTEs, 1 ITE• Hearing aid type: 5 digital, 2
Note: Time intermittency effects of the interference were not considered. All noise types were presented as continuous interfering signals.
100 1 103
1 104
20
15
10
5
0
5
10
15
upper limitlower limit; fields exceeding -10 dB(A/m) at 1 kHzlower limit; fields between -10 and -13 dB(A/m) at 1 kHznominal optimum curve; 1st order rolloff corner = 1370 Hz
upper limitlower limit; fields exceeding -10 dB(A/m) at 1 kHzlower limit; fields between -10 and -13 dB(A/m) at 1 kHznominal optimum curve; 1st order rolloff corner = 1370 Hz
WD ABM1 |H| vs. Frequency
Frequency - Hz
Nor
mal
ized
|H| -
dB
100 1 103
1 104
20
15
10
5
0
5
10
15
Half-band integrated probe response; 1 kHz 1st order high-passNet speech response from nominal sourceHalf-band integrated probe response; 1 kHz 1st order high-passNet speech response from nominal source
Telecoil and Nominal Net Voice Response vs. Frequency
Frequency - Hz
Rel
ativ
e R
espo
nse
- dB
10 100 1 103
1 104
1 105
80
60
40
20
0
20
AweightdB freq q( )( )
freq q( )
Aweight f( )1.2589f
4
20.62
f2 1
f
12200
2
107.72
f2 737.9
2f
2
Perpendicular Transverse Longitudinal
Measuring Telecoil Orientation
Choosing the Source Orientation
Procedure for the Magnetic Matching Level Tests
Measure Telecoil Orientation.Select best orientation magnetic hat: 1 2 3Perpendicular Transverse Longitudinal
Subject adjusts hearing aid volume control for normal use in microphone mode with loudspeaker acoustic speech reference.
Apply magnetically coupled speech to hearing aid in telecoil mode at -25 dBA/m (nominal match to 65 dB-SPL).
Subject adjusts the magnetic level to subjectively match the 65 dB-SPL acoustic level.
Procedure for the Magnetic Speech Level Tests
Subject adjusts the magnetic speech level to their preferred, most comfortable listening level.
Subject then adjusts the magnetic speech level to their lowest acceptable level and highest acceptable level, with the order of these level adjustments counterbalanced across subjects.
Tester resets the magnetic level to the subject's previous MCL and reconfirms setting by having subject rate the speech on a loudness scale.
Instructions for the Magnetic Speech Level Tests
• Most Comfortable Speech Level – your preferred, most comfortable listening level for an extended telephone call.
• Minimum Acceptable Speech Level – the quietest setting you would consider usable for an extended telephone call.
• Maximum Acceptable Speech Level – the loudest setting you would readily tolerate for an extended telephone call.
Axial & Radial
Ambient Magnetic Noise LevelsEquivalent 1 kHz Field Srength (telecoil response)
-70
-65
-60
-55-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
dB
(A/m
)
C-weighted
A-weighted
Procedure for Magnetic S/N Tests
Tester uses adaptive procedure to find subject’s magnetic noise level threshold in the presence of the speech.
Select randomized noise source with corresponding speech source at MCL (1 of 6).
With speech at their self-selected MCL, the subject adjusts the magnetic noise level to:
their highest usable level, their highest normal use level,
their highest level for excellent performance.The level adjustments are accomplished in the order given above or
reversed with order counterbalanced across noise sources and subjects. Once each magnetic noise level adjustment is complete, subjects rate the
speech in noise on an annoyance scale and a usability scale.
Provide training for magnetic S/N tests.
Instructions for Magnetic S/N Tests• Excellent Performance - You would find a phone
with this level of noise to be highly usable. You would have no complaints about this amount of noise for extended phone calls.
• Acceptable for Normal Use – You would find this level of noise to be acceptable for normal, regular use of a phone. You would accept this amount of noise for an extended phone call without becoming tense or tired.
• Usable for a Brief Call - With this level of noise you could successfully complete a brief phone call. However, you would not accept this amount of noise for normal, regular phone use.
GSM Noise:Speech and Noise Levels for Minimum Category Ratings
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
dB(A
/m)
MCL speech
"usable" noise
"normal use" noise
"excellent performance" noise
noise threshold
ambient magnetic noise level
Minimum S/N for a "Usable" Rating
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
test subject
dB
Display
CDMA
GSM
iDEN
TDMA
UMTS
Minimum S/N for a "Normal Use" Rating
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
test subject
dB
Display
CDMA
GSM
iDEN
TDMA
UMTS
Minimum S/N for an "Excellent Performance" Rating
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
test subject
dB
Display
CDMA
GSM
iDEN
TDMA
UMTS
Signal (MCL) to Threshold Ratios
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
test subject
dB
Display
CDMA
GSM
iDEN
TDMA
UMTS
Minimum S/N Ratios (Each data point represents an average judgement
across the 6 noise types. For each performance category, these average S/N ratios are rank ordered from low to high.)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
dB
"Usable"
"Normal Use"
"ExcellentPerformance"
Signal (MCL) toNoise ThresholdRatios
25
15
Lower Category Boundary needed to include:
Usable Normal Use Excellent Performance
70% of the observations
20 dB S/N 27 dB S/N 34 dB S/N
(30 dB S/Nθ) *
80% of the observations
23 dB S/N 29 dB S/N 37 dB S/N
(34 dB S/Nθ) *
90% of the observations
27 dB S/N 34 dB S/N 42 dB S/N
(37 dB S/Nθ) *
*Note: The effective limit for the excellent performance category is the threshold of audibility for the noise in the presence of the intended speech signal at the subject’s most comfortable listening level.