Week five of LER 590 UE, Understanding Engineers, speculates on the differences between engineers today and the technology professional of the future. Using insights from tech visionary research, the historical record since World War II, and philosophical reflection, the talk suggests that tech pros of the future will necessarily be more creative, category creators, rather than the specialized category enhancers of times past.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Technology Professional of the FutureLER 590 - UE, Week 5: From Normal Engineering to Tech Vision
David E. GoldbergIESE, IFoundry, and School of Labor and Employment RelationsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana, Illinois 61801 [email protected]
• Tech visionary research overview by Ray Price.• History lesson:– The world is flat & all that.– Cold war curriculum in internet world?– The academy & 3 missed revolutions.– Technoeconomics behind the revolutions.– A landscape of Os: 3 Os and the missing O.– Postmodern systems & the qual-quant divide.
• 2 frameworks: Pink & Illinois TV research. • Philosophy lessons:– Philosophy as crisis response tool.– The missing basics.
• Raymond L. Price, Severns Chair for Human Behavior, joined the faculty in the fall semester 1998.
• Education: BS, MA from BYU and PhD in OB from Stanford.
• Industrial career includes VP of Human Resources at Allergan, Inc., Director of Employee Training and Development for Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, positions at HP including Manager of Engineering Education.
• Joined UIUC faculty (IESE) in 1998.• Research into tech visionaries & author of
• The following assumptions were/are sacrosanct in many universities:– Basic engineering science is the key to college success.– Government funds superior to industry or foundation funds.– Faculty demonstrate mettle as individuals in narrow specialty
with peer-reviewed journal papers in top journals.• Question one of these incredulous stare, derision, and
ridicule.• These beliefs are not themselves scientific. • They are a paradigm or a mindset that appeared to be
• Paradigms are helpful because they become an unquestioned habit:– Masses work under the paradigm without question.– Share its values and form cohesive, unified organization.
• When times change, paradigm is THE major obstruction to change.
• The paradigm was major contributor to success of many universities in 1960s and 70s.
• Now a major obstacle to change.• Tech academy victim of its past success.• Students still paying price of lock-in to cold war times.
• The paradigm was OK for WW2 & Cold War.• Slow to adapt to external changes thereafter.• Missed revolutions since WW2:–Quality revolution.– Entrepreneurial revolution.– IT revolution.
• Teach the “revolutions,” but do not integrate lessons into academy or curriculum.
• TV personality.• TVs as problem finders in customer needs.• TVs as amateur market researchers.• TVs as market penetrators.• TVs as consumate corporate insiders. • TVs as consumate modelers.
Why Philosophy? Why Now?• Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific
Revolutions:Response to crisis:• “I think, particularly in periods of
acknowledged crisis that scientists have turned to philosophical analysis as a device for unlocking the riddles of their fields. Some have not generally needed or wanted to be philosophers. Indeed, normal science usually holds creative philosophy at arm’s length, and probably for good reason…But that is not to say that the search for assumptions cannot be an effective way to weaken the grip of a tradition upon the mind and to suggest the basis for a new one.”
Bottom Line• From category enhancement to category
creation.• Technoeconomic analysis of where we are.• 3 Os & the missing O. Postmodern systems.• Pink & Price: Category creators & tech visionaries. • Missing basics as central.• Ramifications for HR of the future considerable.• HR professionals who understand historically and
conceptually will be in better place to innovate, aid their companies, and advance.