TECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE GAS PIPELINE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE BALTIC SEA INVESTMENT DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS Prof. Bolesław Mazurkiewicz – Technical University in Gdańsk
Dec 28, 2015
TECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE
GAS PIPELINE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE BALTIC SEA
INVESTMENT DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS
Prof. Bolesław Mazurkiewicz – Technical University in Gdańsk
ISSUES
1. Undersea pipeline design process
2. Laying of the undersea pipelines
3. Protection of the undersea pipelines
4. Intersection of the undersea pipelines and their connection to the offshore platforms
UNDERSEA PIPELINE DESIGN PROCESS
I Stages:
• an initial stage
• measurement and investigation stage and data collection• stage of design works• laying stage
II An initial or preliminary stage:
• type of transported medium
• outer diameter• design pressure• maximal and minimal design temperatures• Scheduled pipeline route• anticipated operation period• type and quality of the pipeline structure, ballasting and protecting materials• anticorrosive protection systems • pipeline wall thickness, ballasting jacket thickness, weight in immersed condition and depth under sea bottom
III Measurement and test stage and data collection
geophysical investigations bathymetrical investigations geotechnical investigations oceanographical investigations
IV Design work stage• an initial design for justification of advisibility of selected route or necessity to change it
• technical design being basis for the pipeline implementation on selected route. Pipeline division into design sections differing definitely in bathymetry, design wave, geotechnical conditions and environment risks.
• Decision on necessity to immerse pipeline below the sea bottom.
• Determination of design safety coefficient within pipeline stability and strength.
V Laying stage
Actions on undersea pipelineType of interaction Cause
Weights Gravity forces
Lift Hydrostatic forces
Liquefaction
Resistance forces Velocity of fixed currents
Oscillatory velocities in wave motion; tearing off of whirls
Lift and tear off forces (crosswise) Velocity of steady currents
Oscillatory velocities in wave motion; tearing off of vortexes
Forces of inertia Oscillatory of molecule acceleration in wave motion
Tensile forces Pipe laying vessel tension; trension cable; pipe laying vessel motions; internal medium pressure; thermal shrinkage
Compressive forces Gravity forces
Pushing out during pipe laying; pipe laying-vessel motions; thermal expansion
Twisting Pipe laying –vessel motions
Connection of hanging loops
Outer pressure Hydrostatic forces
Ground
Internal pressure Medium pressing;
Stroke of pressed medium
Dangers threating the sea pipelines
Danger Prevailing type of ground, region
Geometrical and physical characteristics
Lanslides of the bottoms;runoffs of the bottoms
Soft clays of the delta regions (water depthe less than 60 m)
Width, length, strength and thickness; shear strength and other geotechnical data; expected translocations of considered region or zone
Turbidity currents Soft clays Phenomenon range, equivalent fluid velocities and densities, ground strength and other geotechnical data
Clotted bottoms Mouth deposits Changes of width and level in zone; shear strength and other geotechnical data of caking and surrounding deposits
Intrusions of crystallized salt Mouth deposits Width and expected uplift (elevation), ground shear strength and other geotechnical data
Slopes Regions with seismic danger Width and expected slope translocation, strength and other ground properties
-Liquefaction-Interaction of wave and sea bottom
-loads resulting from the earthquake
Sands , clays
Sands, clays
Width and thickness of the liquefied zone , strength and other ground properties
Local erosion Soft clays and sands Depth and width of the local erosion zone
Lack of pipeline support Sands receptive to erosion; hollow properties
Scope between supporting places, ground strength
Sand waves Debris currents; strong bottom currents
Wave height and range of threaten region
Laying of the undersea pipelines
legend:• Pływaki = floats• Układanie rurociągów za pomocą.... =
Pipeline laying by means of:a. barge up to 25.0 m depth;b. semi-submersible pipeline laying platform
up to 300 m;c. pipeline laying vessel up to 3 000 m
(depending on type of stinger’s type).
INTERACTION DURING LAYING
LEGEND:•siły pionowe = vertical forces•barka = barge•siła ciągnienia = tension force•wysięgnik = stinger•siły poziome = horizontal forces•dno morza = sea bottom•profil prądów …. = crosswise current profile•węzłów = knots
Preventive activity in case of dangers threatening undersea pipelines
Environmental danger
Preventive actions
Pipeline burying
Pipeline uplift Ballasting jacket
Pipeline anchorage
Heavier pipeline
Hydrodynamical forces
Tearing off of wortexes
Local erosion and lack of support
Sand waves
Creeps and runoffs of the bottom deposits
Turbidity currents
Pipeline floating
Deposit caking
crystallization of salt
Slopes, earthquakes
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
Ground liquefaction The pipeline should be designed in such way, so that its unit weight would be as much as possible approximate to the unit weight of the liquefied ground and the pipeline is to be burried below the liquefaction level or to anchor it.
Current requirements concerning large diameter pipeline burying (> 750 mm)
Pipeline laying zone Existing dangers / risks
Current requirements
Future probable immersion practice Remarks
Coastal zone water depth <10 m
Waves, currents, bottom erosion, mud landslides, dredging outlets
3 m
Burying as deeply as possible
Ports and anchorage Waves, currents, drawing works, anchoring
~ 3 m
Burying as deeply as possible
Burying may turn out to be insufficient. It should be considered change of the route or other protecting methods.
Coastal zone and small water depth zone. Distance from the coast 50 km or water depth 30 m
Waves, currents, fishery, anchoring ? dredging works ? variable
Burying required usually only due to stability respects.. Immersion level determined for each specific case.
It should be examined navigation and emergency anchorage statistics.
Pipeline laying zone
Existing dangers / risks
Current requirements
Future probable burying practice Remarks
Open sea, average water depth. 30 m < water depth 100 m. Distance to the coast 50 km
Waves, currents, fishery, ~ 1m
Sinking can be necessary due to stability respects
Protection against fishery can be made by means of suitable concrete jacket
Deep waters, water depth
> 100 m
Waves, fishery
~ 1 m
Sinking is not required
Protection against fishery with suitable concrete jacket
Areas close to platform. Distance to platform < 5 km
Currents, fishery, anchorage of the ocean – technical vessels
~ 3 m
Sink as deep as possible; backfilling
Burying may turn out to be insufficient. Other protecting methods should be considered.
Pipeline protection methods
1. Not protected pipeline rests on the bottom
2. Ballasted pipelines
3. Pipelines on stakes
4. Pipelines on supports (saddles)
5. Anchoraged pipeline
6. Rinsed out pipeline
7. Immersed pipeline – natural backfilling
8. Immersed pipeline – backfilling ( cover) of rock blocks
9. Immersed pipeline - concrete cover
Methods of undersea pipeline burying below sea bottom
1. Stream method (hydraulic loosening)
2. Sandy soil liquefaction method
3. Mechanical cutting method (deepening)
4. Plowing method (plowing)
Evaluation of trench deepening
Liquefacting units Conventional Hydraulical
cultivation
(towed cradles)
Undersea equipment and vehicles
Plowing after layin
g
Plowing before laying
Sandy bottom + - - - - + effective- not effective
Clayey bottom - + + + + +effective-not effective
Method interrelation on equipment on the sea
surface
- - + + + +dependent -independent
Impacts of the sea current - - - - + + small impact-big impact
Method development; conducting, lowering;
lifting
- - - - + Not difficult+difficult
Costs - - - - + +less expensive- expensive
Water depth - - + + - +deep-shallow
Previous experience + + - - + +there are experien
ces-no experiences
Required development and tests
- + - - + +lack of develop
ment- development
exists
Power consumption - - - + + +minor demand- big demand
Productivity - + + + + + large- small
Forces acting on the pipeline - - + - +small-large
_
Damage risk of the undersea pipelines
Anchorage resulting from
machine failure
Anchorage resulting from collision of two
vessels
Running of the vessels at the
bottom of the sea
Total number of events
Annual frequency* and period of repeated damage (including pipeline getting torn)
3.9 ·10-3
256 years
> 4.5 · 10-5
< 22220 years
2.74 · 10-4
3650 years
4.22 ·10-3
237 years
* Frequency is defined as the number of events for year and pipeline kilometer ( km)
Note: In case of laying of the pipeline laying with concrete cover , risk of the pipeline damage caused by fishing tool drawing is not taken into consideration.
Intersection of the undersea pipelines
Types of the pipeline intersection solutions:1. existing pipeline,2. new pipeline3. concrete supports,4. Bags with injection mortar laid in piles,5. begs with sand and cement laid in piles6. hard rubber saddles7. separator8. injection9. pipes for mortar injection 10. pipeline clamped with clamping ring fixed to support11. support made with framework consisting of pipes12. conection of support of bottom by means of ground
anchors
Connection of the undersea pipelines to the offshore platforms
Connection of the pipelines with conventional type riser:1. hinge connection using rotational connectors;2. connection with use of dog’s leg type pipe section;3. connection by means of hyperbaric welding;4. connection with use of a straight section;5. deck;6. platform base.