Top Banner
Technical College Readiness Courses Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation Martha Ann Todd Governor’s Office of Student Achievement State Board of Education Meeting July 20, 2017 1
21

Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Aug 15, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Technical College Readiness Courses

Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

Martha Ann Todd

Governor’s Office of Student Achievement

State Board of Education Meeting

July 20, 2017

1

Page 2: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Presentation Outline

2TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– Background Information

– Overview

– Eligibility Criteria

– Evaluation Questions

– Course Standards and Curricula

– Evaluation Outcomes

– Pilot Student Characteristics

– Adherence to Eligibility Criteria

– ACCUPLACER Performance

– Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Page 3: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Overview

3TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– In fall 2016, Hall County Schools proposed new courses to

help students who lack the skills required for postsecondary

institutions or Move on When Ready courses through technical

colleges.

–The State Board of Education (SBOE) approved the courses

in December 2016.

– Hall County piloted Technical College Readiness (TCR)

English and Mathematics during spring 2017.

– TCR courses focus on ensuring students attain basic skills

required to enroll in technical college and prepare for careers.

Page 4: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Overview (continued)

4TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

–56 students in 3 high schools participated in the pilot.

– East Hall High School

– Johnson High School

– Lanier Career Academy

– Hall County and additional districts across Georgia will

offer the TCR courses in 2017-2018.

– The SBOE requested that GOSA monitor TCR course

implementation and evaluate outcomes.

Page 5: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Eligibility Criteria

5TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

TCR reading and math are third or fourth course options

for 11th and/or 12th grade students who meet all of the

following:

– Have earned credit in Ninth Grade Literature and

Composition or Coordinate Algebra/Algebra I,

– Have earned credit or are concurrently enrolled in

American Literature and Composition or Analytic

Geometry/Geometry, and

– Scored less than 55 on Reading Comprehension or 34

on Arithmetic ACCUPLACER Placement Test

(minimum score required to enroll in TCSG diploma-

level courses).

Page 6: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Evaluation Questions for the Pilot

6TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

1. Are schools adhering to the eligibility criteria?

2. Do ACCUPLACER scores increase for students who

enroll in TCR English and/or Mathematics? What

percentage of students become eligible for

postsecondary coursework at the end of the courses?

3. Are there any patterns in performance between school

systems, student subgroups, prior math performance,

or grade level?

Page 7: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Course Standards and Curricula

7TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– Hall County developed standards and curricula with the

Department of Education and Northwest Georgia RESA.

– Hall County provided teachers with instructional

support (training, observations, weekly webinars) and a

blended learning platform.

–Students took the ACCUPLACER before, in the middle,

and at the end of the courses.

Page 8: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Pilot Student Characteristics

8TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– 56 students enrolled in TCR English or Mathematics

– 24 students in TCR English

– 33 students in TCR Mathematics

Hispanic

75.0%

Black or

Multiracial

5.4%

White

19.6%

Race/

Ethnicity

Female

48.2%Male

51.8%Gender

62.5%

Free/Reduced-Price

Lunch

55.4%

Limited English

Proficiency

12.5%

Students with

Disability

Page 9: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Adherence to Eligibility Criteria

9TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– 43% of TCR students were in 10th grade; courses were intended for

11th and/or 12th grade students.

– Some students had been in high school for more than two years but

were 10th graders in terms of credits, and others were 11th graders

after fall 2016 credits were counted.

– GOSA and GaDOE are considering removing this criterion since

student grade levels do not necessarily correspond to whether

students have completed prerequisite courses for MOWR.

TCR Enrollment by Grade Level

GradeTCR English Enrollment

Percentage

TCR Mathematics

Enrollment Percentage

Overall Enrollment

Percentage

10th 37.5% 45.4% 42.9%

11th 41.7% 6.1% 21.4%

12th 20.8% 48.5% 35.7%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Page 10: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Adherence to Eligibility Criteria

10TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– Three students had not earned prerequisite credits or were not

concurrently enrolled in American Lit. or Analytic

Geometry/Geometry.

– In a couple instances students had ACCUPLACER pre-test

scores above the eligibility cutoff score.

–In the future, Hall County plans to double check all requirements

after the course drop deadline to

– Verify students received credit for prerequisite courses, and

– Validate that ACCUPLACER pre-test scores are below the

eligibility threshold.

– Hall County also plans to conduct more staff training on course

eligibility criteria.

Page 11: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

ACCUPLACER Information

11TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– ACCUPLACER is a computer-adaptive placement test

developed by College Board.

– Possible scores range from 20 to 120.

– Technical colleges in Georgia use the ACCUPLACER to

place students in courses and set performance thresholds

for diploma-level and degree-level coursework.

Diploma-Level Thresholds

Reading 55 or higher

Arithmetic 34 or higher

Degree-Level Thresholds

Reading 64 or higher

Arithmetic 34 or higher

Elementary Algebra 57 or higher

Page 12: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

ACCUPLACER Performance

12TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– 87.5% of students increased ACCUPLACER score

after taking TCR.

– 71.4% of students became eligible for postsecondary

coursework (scored higher than cutoff score).

– More mathematics students (90.9%) became eligible for

postsecondary coursework than English students (45.8%).

Page 13: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Reading Comprehension ACCUPLACER Performance

13TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

ACCUPLACER Reading Comprehension Score

(Possible Score Range is 20 to 120)

DegreeDiploma

Post-Test Did Not Meet Threshold

Post-Test Met Diploma Level

Pre-Test Score

Post-Test Met Degree Level

24students took the course.

11students are now eligible to

enroll in diploma-level courses.

8students are now eligible to

enroll in degree-level courses.

Each bar represents a student’s

pre- and post-test score.

Page 14: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Arithmetic ACCUPLACER Performance

14TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

ACCUPLACER Arithmetic Score

(Possible Score Range is 20 to 120.)

Diploma

Post-Test Did Not Meet Threshold

Pre-Test Score

Post-Test Met Diploma Level

33students took the course.

30students are now eligible for

diploma-level courses.

Each bar represents a

student’s pre- and post-test

score.

Page 15: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Elementary Algebra ACCUPLACER Performance

15TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

ACCUPLACER Elementary Algebra Score

(Possible Score Range is 20 to 120.)

Degree

Did Not Meet Threshold

Met Degree Level

29 of 33math students took the

Elementary Algebra

ACCUPLACER.

15students are now eligible for

degree-level courses.

Each bar represents a student’s

score. Pre-tests were not taken

in Elementary Algebra.

Page 16: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Patterns in Performance

16TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– Due to the small sample of pilot students, GOSA did not examine

performance by demographic subgroups.

–At least 95% of students in TCR English or Mathematics scored

below proficient on prior Ninth Grade Literature or Coordinate

Algebra EOCs/EOCTs.

–Students who were Beginning Learners on the Ninth Grade

Literature EOC were less likely to increase their ACCUPLACER

scores or qualify for diploma-level coursework than students who

were Developing Learners.

– Students with lower Coordinate Algebra scores performed just as

well or better than students with higher Coordinate Algebra scores.

Page 17: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Lessons Learned

17TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– TCR courses provided students an opportunity to have a

future beyond high school that otherwise would not have

been possible.

– A supply of adaptable lesson plans and classroom-

embedded coaching were key supports from district.

– Small class sizes enabled one-on-one, personalized

instruction for students that was critical for success.

– Student engagement fell over the duration of the courses,

particularly in TCR Mathematics after students met goal at

mid-year.

Page 18: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Recommendations

18TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– Identify students who are motivated and understand the

purpose of TCR prior to enrollment.

– Select teachers who have taught in various classroom

environments, had prior success with struggling students,

and are willing to be flexible.

– Be prepared to focus on basic, discrete skills in both

courses to build the foundational skills needed to master

course standards.

Page 19: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Recommendations

19TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

–Encourage strong student-teacher relationships and

small class sizes.

– Use a block/semester schedule for the courses to align

with technical college schedules.

– Set higher goals at the beginning of the courses to help

maintain student engagement.

- Provide and enforce more specific teacher grading

criteria that place a strong focus and requirement on

student ACCUPLACER growth during the courses.

Page 20: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Next Steps

20TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

– Schools implementing TCR in 2017-2018 have access, in

GaDOE’s Teacher Resource Link, to all lesson plans and

teacher resource guides developed by Hall County.

–When additional data become available, GOSA will

examine Move On When Ready postsecondary credit

attainment and four-year graduation rate of the pilot

students in an addendum to this evaluation.

– In future years, GOSA will monitor enrollment data and

evaluate student outcomes for enrolled students across the

state.

Page 21: Technical College Readiness Courses–ACCUPLACER Performance –Lessons Learned and Recommendations . Overview 3 TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation July 20, 2017 –In fall 2016, Hall

Questions?

21

Contact Information

Martha Ann Todd

Executive Director

[email protected]

404-463-1160

TCR Spring 2017 Pilot Evaluation

July 20, 2017

Twitter: @GOSA_GAfacebook.com/TheGovernorsOfficeOfStudentAchievement