Top Banner
This program underwritten in part by a generous grant from
75

Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Aug 20, 2015

Download

Business

mhobren
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

This program underwritten in part by a generous grant from

Page 2: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Understanding and ApplyingDocumentation Usability

A Training Demo for Technical Communicators

Page 3: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability

This presentation covers:

• What Usability is and isn’t

• Some of the tools of Usability

• Some dos and don’ts of Usability

• The end goals of Usability

Page 4: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability

Firstly…

What This Presentation Isn’t!

Page 5: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

The Tip of the

Iceberg!

Page 6: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

What Usability Testing Isn’t

Readability either, such as…

The Gunning Fog Index:

Avg. sentence length + the number of words of 3 syllables or more per 100 words * 0.4 = the approximate grade level at which material can be read.

OR…

Page 7: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

What Usability Testing Isn’t

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Formula:

0.39 * (average words/sentence ) + 11.8 * (average syllables/word) - 15.59 = Grade Level.

Question: Who do you think uses such formulary…and for what purposes?

Page 8: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

What Usability Testing Isn’t

• The Dept. of Education

• School Districts

• College Presses

• Book Publishers

…And so on and so forth!

Page 9: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

What Usability Testing Isn’t

Readability is “Denotative,” metrics-driven

(formulaic, quantitative…)

Whereas Usability is…

“Connotative” and people-oriented

Readability “Calculates,”

Usability “Infers!”

Page 10: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability IS

Simply put…

The ease with which people can employ a particular tool or other human-made object in order to achieve a particular goal or task.

Page 11: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Passive vs. Active Testing

Gathering user opinions about a document (or a product) via surveys, forms, hand-outs, etc. is Passive Usability Testing.

Active testing involves a controlled experiment to determine how well people actually use the document (or product).

Page 12: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability

Rather than showing users a rough draft and asking, "Do you understand this?", usability testing involves watching people trying to use something for its intended purpose…

To complete a specific task!

Page 13: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

UsabilityExample…

When testing instructions for assembling a toy, the test subjects should be given the instructions and a box of parts. Instruction phrasing, illustration quality, and even the toy's design all affect the assembly process.

Page 14: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Watching…Evaluating

Page 15: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability

In human-computer interaction and computer science, Usability refers

to the elegance and clarity with which the interaction with a computer program or a web site is designed.

Page 16: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability & Ascertainment

The FCC requirement for non-commercial broadcast stations applies U-techniques:

• Questionnaires, Mail-Outs

• Person-on-the-street surveys

• Telephone polling in key markets

Page 17: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability• Usability attempts to observe how effectively a user (or a consumer) interacts with a document (or product).

• 3 questions to consider when determining a document’s Usability…

Page 18: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability & Documentation• How easy is it to learn?

• How easy is it to use?

• How satisfying is the experience?

Page 19: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability

Some of the Tools of

Usability Measurement

Page 20: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

The Semantic Differential

One of the best-known and most widely used Usability tools is the Semantic Differential.

Example: Please check one of the boxes below?

Excellent Good Adequate Poor Inadequate

� � � �

Page 21: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

The Semantic DifferentialThe Semantic Differential was developed in the 1950s by University of Illinois psychologist Charles Osgood.

The Semantic Differential is a rating scale used to measure the connotative meaning of objects, events, and concepts.

Page 22: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Osgood’s Semantic Differential

In Osgood's Semantic Differential, the respondent is asked to choose where their position lies on:

• A range of words or numbers spanning across a bipolar position, or

• A scale between two bipolar terms.

Page 23: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Model of a S-Diff. Bipolar Scale

Page 24: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability TechniquesImitation…

• Can be the highest form of praise

OR

• The mother of re-invention.

SO…

Page 25: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

What does “Big Blue” (or Purple)

Do?

Page 26: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Included as “Back Matter’ in all docs

Page 27: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Expanded Semantic Diff. Mailer Format

Page 28: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

The BRM Side: Cost-effective,

encourages user response

Page 29: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

A Word on E-UsabilityDirect Electronic Feedback

Requirement: MIS Dept. “Buy In!”

Page 30: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation
Page 31: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability TechniquesDocument Usability means that people who use documents created by you, the writers, can do so quickly and easily to accomplish their own tasks. Technical writers thinking about the usability of their documents should…

Page 32: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Document Techniques• Focus on the end-users

• Understand that people use documentation to be productive

• Realize that users are busy people trying to accomplish tasks

• Remember that users decide when a document is easy to use…ultimately!

Page 33: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability Testing Usability testing involves measuring how

well users respond in 4 areas:

• Time

• Accuracy

• Recall

• Emotional Response

Page 34: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability Testing

• Time on Task -- How long does it take the user to complete a basic task?

(Example: Enter a new patient, order a test, obtain the results of the test, generate a report of test results.)

Page 35: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability Testing

• Accuracy -- How many mistakes did the user make?

(And were they fatal or recoverable with the right information?)

Page 36: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability Testing• Recall -- How much does the user

remember afterwards or after periods of non-use?

Page 37: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usability Testing

• Emotional Response -- How does the person feel about the task completed?

(Confident? Stressed? Would the user recommend this system to an associate?)

Page 38: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Methodology: Heuristics

Some of the guidelines for applying Usability best practices are what communicators have termed Heuristics.

(pronounced: your - wrist - ticks)

Page 39: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Methodology: Heuristics Heuristics can…

• Lead to solutions that are reasonably close to the best possible answer,

• Provide "rules of thumb," educated guesses, intuitive judgments or simply common sense,

• Employ strategies that use readily accessible, though loosely applicable, information to control problem-solving in situations.

Page 40: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Methodology: Heuristics

NOW, here’s Mike’s “Top 10 List” of

How To Apply Heuristics To Your Documentation…

Page 41: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Methodology: Heuristics

“Somebody give me a drum roll?”

Page 42: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

10. Load pages and content in a timely way.

Page 43: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

10. Load pages and content in a timely way.

9. Speak user’s language in terms they know.

Page 44: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation
Page 45: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

10. Load pages and content in a timely way.

9. Speak user’s language in terms they know.

8. Be consistent with graphics, buttons, content.

Page 46: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

10. Load pages and content in a timely way.

9. Speak user’s language in terms they know.

8. Be consistent with graphics, buttons, content.

7. Make key information visible.

Page 47: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

10. Load pages and content in a timely way.

9. Speak user’s language in terms they know.

8. Be consistent with graphics, buttons, content.

7. Make key information visible.

6. Always keep users oriented.

Page 48: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Don’t Leave Them Wandering Aimlessly In The Desert!

Page 49: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

5. Provide clearly marked exits.

Page 50: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

5. Provide clearly marked exits.

4. Tailor actions to novice and expert users.

Page 51: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

5. Provide clearly marked exits.

4. Tailor actions to novice and expert users.

3. Minimize “off-task,” non-essential information.

Page 52: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Don’t Create Road Blocks For Users!

Page 53: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

5. Provide clearly marked exits.

4. Tailor actions to novice and expert users.

3. Minimize “off-task,” non-essential information.

2. Express error messages in plain language.

Page 54: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Mike’s “Top 10 List” of Heuristic Methodology

5. Provide clearly marked exits.

4. Tailor actions to novice and expert users.

3. Minimize “off-task,” non-essential information.

2. Express error messages in plain language.

1. Use minimalism for wording and designs.

Page 55: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Verbal MinimalismSaying More with Less!• Economy: Don’t use 24 steps if 12 will do!

Page 56: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Verbal MinimalismSaying More with Less!• Economy: Don’t use 24 steps if 12 will do!

• Edit, chop, cut and then edit some more!

Page 57: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Verbal MinimalismSaying More with Less!• Economy: Don’t use 24 steps if 12 will do!

• Edit, chop, cut and then edit some more!

French writer Blaise Pascal, in a 6-page letter to a friend, once said, “I apologize for writing you 6 pages but I didn’t have time to write only 3.”

Page 58: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Embedded Object or Submenu?!

Page 59: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Audience Analysis:A meeting of the minds!

Page 60: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Focus Groups…• Can provide the best “litmus test” of

your documentation’s usability by providing you with direct, objective user feedback.

• Are an “Active” approach to U-testing!

Page 61: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Client Focus Groups

BUT if we can’t go on-site,

how do we obtain clients’

DIRECT feedback?

HOW can we obtain

clients’ input?

Page 62: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Documents + Daiquiris = Ummm!

Page 63: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Client Focus Groups

SNUG

• SoftIWS / FLARE Help demo

Purpose: Show & Tell only, OR

Let clients test-drive the system:

1. Observe their usage, comments.

2. Sell themselves on Help product.

Page 64: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Client Focus Groups

SNUG

• SoftIWS / FLARE Help demo

• Other team activities: Active vs. Passive

(To be tabled for another meeting!)

AND don’t forget sources close to home…

Page 65: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Internal SCC Staffers!

• Implementers

• Account Executives

• CSRs

• Sales Staff

Page 66: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Usage Data Warehousing

• External client-based usage data

• Internal staff-based usage input

Hosted on Shared Folder site in…

Page 67: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

User Feedback:“The Good, The Bad,and The (sometimes) Smugly!”

What to expect?

• Adulation?

• Gripes?

• Useful Input!

Page 68: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

User Feedback:“The Good, The Bad,and The (sometimes) Smugly!”

What to expect?

• Adulation?

• Gripes?

• Useful Input!

Page 69: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

The Dos and Don’tsof User Documentation

Results:

In the Final Analysis…

Page 70: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Minimize Users Descending On Your CSRs!

Page 71: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Leave ‘Em Jumping For Joy!

Page 72: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Don’t Cause Them To Blow Their Tops!

Page 73: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation
Page 74: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

Make It Smooth Sailing For Them, Always!

Page 75: Tech. Writing Usability Presentation

THE END