Top Banner
TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014
16

TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Jessie Webster
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

TEC and its Uncertainty

Ludger Scherliess

Center for Atmospheric and Space SciencesUtah State University

GEM Mini-WorkshopSan Francisco

December 2014

Page 2: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

2

Total Electron Content (TEC)

Total number of electrons in a column

with cross section of 1m2

(1 TECU = 1016 electrons/m2)

1m2

Page 3: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

33

TEC Measurements

• Use Ionospheric effects on radio wave propagation

– Faraday rotation of the polarization angle of a radio wave Require magnitude of the geomagnetic field

Essex and Watkins, 1973

TEC from Macquarie Island for 19-21 May, 1970

180o = 2.5 TECU

Page 4: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

44

TEC Measurements

• Use Ionospheric effects on radio wave propagation

– Ionospheric effects on GPS signals

SOPAC Online Map Interface (http://sopac.ucsd.edu/cgi-bin/smi)

– Time delay of signal

– Phase advance of carrier wave

Page 5: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

Differential Range and Differential Phase

Jakowski, 1996

+

• Differential Time Delay

• Noisy

• “Absolute” TEC

• Differential Phase

• Accurate (0.01 TECU)

• Relative TEC

A dual-frequency GPS receiver provides pseudorange and carrier phase measurements in both L1 and L2 frequencies

Page 6: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

Differential Range and Differential Phase

+

A dual-frequency GPS receiver provides pseudorange and carrier phase measurements in both L1 and L2 frequencies

Leveling

Combination of the two methods by leveling the accurate but relative phase TEC to the noisy but absolute pseudorange values we obtain a better TEC estimate.

Problem: Result is still biased (differential code biases)

Page 7: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

Many ways to get GPS Biases

• Least-Squares• Kalman Filter– Universität Bern Astronomisches Institut • (http://aiuws.unibe.ch/ionosphere/)• P1P2 and P1C1 files (satellite biases, IGS stations)

• GAIM Models – Use bias file for satellites and available stations– Others build into Kalman filterBiases lead to uncertainties in absolute TEC

of the order of about 1-4 TECU

TECabs = TECrel + DCBGPS + DCBREC

Page 8: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

8

Slant Total Electron Content (sTEC)

To convert sTEC to vTEC often a so-called single-layer model is used. All free electrons are assumed to be contained in a thin shell at altitude H. The altitude of this idealized layer is often set to 400 km approximately

corresponding to the altitude of maximum electron density.

Page 9: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

9

Mapping of sTEC to vTECErrors can reach as high as 14% on days of no strong ionosphere activity

Smith et al., 2008

Page 10: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

10

Example of GPS TEC measurements

• Slant TEC Values have been mapped to the Vertical

• Plotted at the 300 km pierce-point

Page 11: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

2D TEC Maps

http://iono.jpl.nasa.gov/latest_rti_global.html

Page 12: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

TEC Maps

http://origin-www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/us-total-electron-content

TEC Standard Deviation

Page 13: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

Differential (Relative) TEC

Tohoku-Oki Earthquake and Tsunami in Earth's Upper AtmosphereGalvan et al., 2014

Uninterrupted GPS data along a particular receiver-satellite link with no cycle slips is very precise (~0.01 TECU)

Time Evolution of relative TEC (high precision) can be observed over several hours.

Errors due to instrumental

biases cancel. High relative accuracy can

be achieved. Useful to capture transient

events and/or gradients. However, often absolute

values are of importance.

Page 14: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

Tohoku-Oki Earthquake and Tsunami in Earth's Upper Atmosphere

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA14430

Differential (Relative) TEC

Page 15: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

15

Vertical Total Electron Content from TOPEX/Jason

TOPEX and Jason satellites provide vertical TEC (up to about 1300 km altitude) over the oceans from 1992 until now.

Largest errors are associated with biases of the order of 3-5 TECU.

http://lion.iggcas.ac.cn:8080/index.php/News/view2/id/34

Page 16: TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.

16

Slant Total Electron Content (sTEC)

COSMIC-2 Accuracy Requirements:Relative TEC: 0.3 TECU AccuracyAbsolute TEC: 3 TECU Accuracy

Yue et al., 2014