TCGA Results for Endometrial Cancer Douglas A. Levine, MD Head, Gynecology Research Laboratory Associate Attending Surgeon Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center @LevineMD Douglas A. Levine, MD
TCGA Results for Endometrial Cancer
Douglas A. Levine, MDg ,Head, Gynecology Research Laboratory
Associate Attending SurgeonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
@LevineMDDouglas A. Levine, MD
The face of clinical trials is changingThe face of clinical trials is changing
@LevineMDDouglas A. Levine, MD
Types of endometrial cancerTypes of endometrial cancerEndometrioid (low grade) Serous (high grade) Serous vs Endometrioid
• More solid• Less glandular• Higher grade nuclei• Higher grade nuclei• Greater N:C ratio• Loss of polarity
@LevineMDDouglas A. Levine, MD
Sample criteria limit ‘askable’ questions
Newly diagnosed untreated invasive tumors• Newly diagnosed, untreated, invasive tumors• Snap frozen, <60min to LN2
– ~50 mg wet weight
f
10,000
• Pathology review of contributed tissue• ≥60% tumor cells, ≤20% necrosis• Matched germline DNA• Select clinical annotation• IRB approval for TCGA use and general data
sharing10 g• MTA without retention of IP
8
Copy number alteration clusters
1q amplificationq p
24% of high-grade endometrioid tumors cluster with serous
11
Andrew Cherniack, Broadtumors cluster with serous tumors (serous-like)
Extended 1q analysisExtended 1q analysis
• Clinically relevant analysis of TCGA dataClinically relevant analysis of TCGA data• Significantly decreased PFS for 1q amp’d group
– Independent of standard histopathologyIndependent of standard histopathology– Within stage I pts
• Limited by 26 mos f/uy /• Remarkable
– Endometrioid 1q subsetEndometrioid
Serous-like
EndometrioidLow CNASerous-likeAmp1qModerate CNA
@LevineMDDouglas A. Levine, MD
Itai Pashtan, Andrew Cherniack, Broad
Mutation spectrum
High background mutation rate; ~10-20 / Mb
Low background mutation rate; ~2-3 / Mb
Very high background
20 / Mbmutation rate; ~100-500 / Mb
Cyriac Kandoth and Li Ding, WashU Niki S h lt Nil W i h ld MSKCC
Hypermutators associated with MSI and MLH1 DNA
13
Niki Schultz, Nils Weinhold, MSKCCwith MSI and MLH1 DNA promoter methylation
Progression free survival
Serous poorest PFS
15
Serous – poorest PFSNo difference between MSI and MSS groupsNo events in small POLE group
Copy number spectrum
MSI, MLH1 meth, Few SCNA, high
MSS, Many SCNA, Low mutation rate
MSS, Few SCNA, Low mutation rate
mutation rate
MSS, Few SCNA, very high
Cyriac Kandoth and Li Ding, WashU Niki S h lt Nil W i h ld MSKCC
16
SCNA, very high mutation rate
Niki Schultz, Nils Weinhold, MSKCC
Integrated features
All endometrioid, TP53 mutations, few All endometrioid, PTEN mutations, few TP53 mutations
PTEN mutations, high grade tumors, serous and some endometrioid
PTEN mutations, no TP53 mutations
17
endometrioid Cyriac Kandoth and Li Ding, WashU Niki Schultz, Nils Weinhold, MSKCC
RAS/CTNNB1 pathway - MEMo
• Extensive activation of CTNNB1 through novel mechanism; different than CRC cancer• New SOX17 hotspot mutations identified
19
Niki Schultz, Nils Weinhold, MSKCC
Multiplatform molecular similarities among ovarian serous, uterine serous, basal like breast, ,
22
Andrew Cherniack, Hui Shen, Wei Zhang, Chris Benz, Peter Laird, Yuexin Liu, Christina Yau
@LevineMDDouglas A. Levine, MDCancer Genome Atlas Research Network, et al. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10):1113-1120.
Background Mutation FrequenciesBackground Mutation Frequencies
Di t ib ti f t ti i 127Mutation frequencies, spectra,
Background Mutation FrequenciesBackground Mutation Frequencies
Distribution of mutations in 127 SMGs across Pan-Cancer cohort
and contexts across 12 cancer types
@LevineMDDouglas A. Levine, MDKandoth C, et al. Nature. 2013;502(7471):333-339.
CommentsComments
• Genomic landscape (from TCGA or other sources) willGenomic landscape (from TCGA or other sources) will form backbone for clinical trial design of targeted agents with defined mechanism
S l ti t tifi ti– Selection vs. stratification– Intelligent trials (with biospecimens)
• Expected alterations do not result in response to p ptargeted agents with defined mechanisms of action– Endometrial phase II trials of mTORi
• Properly designed clinical trials will allow us to learnProperly designed clinical trials will allow us to learn about mechanisms of response and resistance
@LevineMDDouglas A. Levine, MD