8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
1/265
Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.9635 Maroon Circle, Suite 120Englewood, Colorado 80112
Phone: 720-963-9200Fax: 720-963-9700
Email: [email protected]
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report
for
Eagle County Re 50 School DistrictAccountability Version
Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
2/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page iReport generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Executive Summary Report
Overview of this Document
This report includes graphic and tabular representations of your 2013 TCAP test results for thedistrict and for schools. It is designed with the following audiences in mind:
School Board Press / Public District and School Accountability Committees District and School Administrative Leadership Team
The Executive Summary Reportis available immediately after the test scores are released todistricts, at a time when the most important questions to answer are:
How does our performance compare to that of the state? How did our performance change this year compared with our performance in prior years? Are the students from various disaggregated groups performing equally well? If not, where arethe gaps?
The Executive Summary Reportaddresses these questions directly. More extensive reports for thedistrict and schools are generated after the state releases additional information in the weeks thatfollow the initial press conference.
Various accountability mandates require data to be reported in several different ways. The data inthis report are presented for all studentsincluding students who eventually will be excluded from theSchool Accountability Reports and/or No Child Left Behind reports. Separate reports are produced
by Alpine based on the specific inclusion and exclusion rules for each of these accountabilitymandates.
The minimum number of students in any given group necessary to generate a graph appears in thelower right corner of each page of this report. This number is set by the district or by the end userdirectly. If you print a report with a minimum of fewer than 10 students, we strongly suggest that younot share it publicly to protect the privacy rights of students.
The accuracy of the information in this report depends upon the accuracy of information in theTCAP/CSAP files and in other documents downloaded from the Colorado Department of Education(CDE) website. Historic achievement data were updated where necessary to reflect the state'srescaling of reading prior to 2001 and writing and math prior to 2002. The records are spot checkedbefore reports are released, but if any school does not appear on this report (e.g., a new school thisyear), or if any result does not make sense, please contact Alpine and we will make any correctionsnecessary.
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
3/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page iiReport generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Overall Guiding Questions
This report contains a great deal of information. It is a report you probably will return to regularly asyou share your results with many different audiences in the months ahead.
Look for patterns and trends throughout the report and consider the most important issues facingyour district/school. You should be able to summarize the results for the district or for any school in3-5 descriptive statements. This report is focused on the big picture, not on the details.
Below are some questions to keep in mind as you review your results. Additional questions that arespecific to the interpretation of a particular graph format are shown below sample graphs on the nextseveral pages. The questions below are just a starter list. You will have many more to add.
How well did students in the district/schools perform on the tests overall? Were you pleased
overall with student performance this year? Which grade levels did you think would do well? Did they perform as well as they should have?
In which content areas did you expect the highest performance? What do the data suggest?
In what ways are these data similar to other achievement data you have collected aboutstudents? In what ways are they different?
Which schools showed the most improvement? Which showed the least improvement? Why doyou think this occurred?
What is the good news story from these results?
What was a surprise? What concerns do you have after reviewing these results?
Did you target specific areas for improvement this year? Was there a relationship between yourfocus area and performance? Were there trade offs in other areas?
How might this information guide curriculum and instructional planning decisions in the district?
What factors do you think are related to your performance?
What targets will you set for achievement and/or improvement for next year's tests?
What will you do now?
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
4/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 1Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
All Students Totals
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
8 20 66 7 72 0
10 17 66 7 73 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
38 98 322 32 354 1
6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
8 10
20 17
66 66
7 70 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
12 20 61 7 68 0
12 17 65 6 71 0
10 22 64 5 69 0
7 19 67 7 74 0
7 20 64 9 74 0
8 20 66 7 72 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
46 78 235 27 262 1
61 83 325 32 357 0
45 102 299 23 322 1
33 91 315 33 348 0
35 104 341 48 389 1
38 98 322 32 354 1
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
68
2009
71
2010
69
2011
74
2012
74
2013
72
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Cop
yright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Pe
rcentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
72
28
76
24
68
31
X X X
56
44
87
13
X X
30
68
53
47
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
491
241
250
3
7
3
232
237
1
8
40
189
% Prof. or Above
72
76
68
X
X
X
56
87
X
X
30
53
% Below
28
24
31
X
X
X
44
13
X
X
68
47
% NS
0
0
0
X
X
X
0
0
X
X
3
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
5/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 2Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
10 23 63 3 67 0
11 21 63 5 68 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
51 122 332 17 349 1
6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
10 11
23 21
63 63
3 5 0 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
11 24 62 3 65 0
14 22 59 5 64 0
9 22 66 3 69 1
6 24 65 4 70 0
7 21 65 6 72 0
10 23 63 3 67 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
46 95 248 12 260 1
57 93 248 21 269 2
44 110 338 15 353 4
28 110 297 20 317 1
35 104 322 32 354 0
51 122 332 17 349 1
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
65
2009
64
2010
69
2011
70
2012
72
2013
67
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
67
33
72
28
63
37
X X X
46
54
88
12
X X 16
84
43
57
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
523
234
289
4
10
3
243
257
0
6
62
219
% Prof. or Above
67
72
63
X
X
X
46
88
X
X
16
43
% Below
33
28
37
X
X
X
54
12
X
X
84
57
% NS
0
0
0
X
X
X
0
0
X
X
0
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
6/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 3Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
8 18 65 9 74 1
11 18 62 8 70 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
42 89 329 44 373 3
7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
8 1118 18
65 62
9 81 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
10 20 60 9 70 0
13 19 63 5 68 0
8 17 65 9 74 0
10 16 66 8 74 0
8 18 63 11 73 0
8 18 65 9 74 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
38 77 230 36 266 0
55 81 270 21 291 2
36 74 274 39 313 1
50 81 329 40 369 1
40 86 297 50 347 0
42 89 329 44 373 3
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
70
2009
68
2010
74
2011
74
2012
73
2013
74
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
74
26
77
22
70
29
X X X
58
41
90
10
X X
27
71
56
43
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
507
243
264
5
1
1
245
249
0
6
52
210
% Prof. or Above
74
77
70
X
X
X
58
90
X
X
27
56
% Below
26
22
29
X
X
X
41
10
X
X
71
43
% NS
1
0
1
X
X
X
1
0
X
X
2
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
7/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 4Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
6 14 63 15 79 1
8 18 62 11 73 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
30 66 297 72 369 3
4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
6 814 18
63 62
1511
1 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
12 23 53 12 65 0
6 22 59 13 72 0
9 15 60 15 75 0
7 15 64 13 78 0
7 16 63 14 77 0
6 14 63 15 79 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
50 94 219 51 270 1
24 87 236 52 288 0
40 66 258 65 323 2
30 66 280 58 338 1
37 79 309 69 378 0
30 66 297 72 369 3
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
65
2009
72
2010
75
2011
78
2012
77
2013
79
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
79
21
83
16
75
25
X X X
64
35
93
7
X X
34
66
60
39
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
468
224
244
1
4
0
230
225
0
8
50
189
% Prof. or Above
79
83
75
X
X
X
64
93
X
X
34
60
% Below
21
16
25
X
X
X
35
7
X
X
66
39
% NS
1
1
0
X
X
X
1
0
X
X
0
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
8/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 5Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
9 16 65 9 74 1
11 21 59 9 68 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
44 79 324 46 370 6
6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
9 1116
21
65 59
9 91 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
15 21 56 7 63 0
12 19 57 12 70 0
6 20 64 10 73 0
10 19 60 11 71 0
11 14 64 11 75 0
9 16 65 9 74 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
57 81 212 26 238 1
48 77 235 50 285 0
25 78 248 37 285 0
43 80 257 46 303 0
49 62 282 48 330 0
44 79 324 46 370 6
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
63
2009
70
2010
73
2011
71
2012
75
2013
74
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
74
25
73
26
76
24
X X X
57
41
92
7
X X 11
87
52
46
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
499
245
254
6
8
4
249
227
0
5
46
209
% Prof. or Above
74
73
76
X
X
X
57
92
X
X
11
52
% Below
25
26
24
X
X
X
41
7
X
X
87
46
% NS
1
2
1
X
X
X
2
1
X
X
2
2
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
9/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 6Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
10 19 62 9 71 0
10 23 59 8 67 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
43 84 273 39 312 2
5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
10 1019 23
62 59
9 80 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
10 20 61 10 70 0
14 18 61 7 68 0
9 19 63 9 72 0
6 21 62 11 73 0
11 22 59 7 66 1
10 19 62 9 71 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
39 78 241 38 279 0
52 66 222 24 246 0
38 77 261 38 299 2
24 83 249 43 292 1
49 98 263 32 295 3
43 84 273 39 312 2
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
70
2009
68
2010
72
2011
73
2012
66
2013
71
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
71
29
77
23
66
34
X X X
54
45
88
13
X X
8
92
50
49
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
441
199
242
1
6
1
217
208
0
8
38
171
% Prof. or Above
71
77
66
X
X
X
54
88
X
X
8
50
% Below
29
23
34
X
X
X
45
13
X
X
92
49
% NS
0
1
0
X
X
X
1
0
X
X
0
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
10/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 7Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
7 23 65 5 69 1
7 24 64 4 68 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
32 101 286 21 307 3
4258 14768 39370 2272 41642 879
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
7 7
23 24
65 64
5 4 1 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
9 31 54 5 58 1
5 25 64 3 67 3
11 22 60 3 63 5
8 21 64 5 69 3
4 22 70 2 72 2
7 23 65 5 69 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
34 116 200 17 217 5
19 99 255 10 265 13
44 91 250 11 261 21
33 90 278 23 301 11
20 98 313 11 324 7
32 101 286 21 307 3
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
58
2009
67
2010
63
2011
69
2012
72
2013
69
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
69
30
74
26
64
35
X X X
53
46
88
11
X X18
80
52
47
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
443
239
204
2
6
4
231
195
0
5
50
208
% Prof. or Above
69
74
64
X
X
X
53
88
X
X
18
52
% Below
30
26
35
X
X
X
46
11
X
X
80
47
% NS
1
0
1
X
X
X
1
1
X
X
2
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
11/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 8Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
5 20 64 11 74 1
7 21 59 10 70 2
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
20 85 274 46 320 6
4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
5 7
20 21
64 59
11 101 2
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
9 21 60 8 69 1
8 29 56 5 61 2
10 22 57 9 66 3
12 24 56 5 61 3
6 20 62 11 73 1
5 20 64 11 74 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
38 87 248 35 283 5
31 109 213 20 233 6
38 86 225 34 259 10
46 93 213 19 232 12
26 83 259 46 305 3
20 85 274 46 320 6
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
69
2009
61
2010
66
2011
61
2012
73
2013
74
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
74
24
80
20
69
29
X X X
62
36
85
14
X X
33
64
57
40
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
431
203
228
6
4
0
193
221
1
6
39
168
% Prof. or Above
74
80
69
X
X
X
62
85
X
X
33
57
% Below
24
20
29
X
X
X
36
14
X
X
64
40
% NS
1
0
2
X
X
X
2
1
X
X
3
2
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
12/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 9Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
22 17 61 0 61 0
15 20 51 13 64 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
4 3 11 0 11 0
181 234 601 151 752 8
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
2215 17
20
6151
0
13
0 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
12 12 70 7 77 0
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
6 19 63 13 75 0
15 20 65 0 65 0
22 17 61 0 61 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
5 5 30 3 33 0
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
1 3 10 2 12 0
3 4 13 0 13 0
4 3 11 0 11 0
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
77
2009
X
2010
X
2011
75
2012
65
2013
61
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
61
39
X X X X X
61
39
X X X X
61
39
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
18
6
12
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
3
18
% Prof. or Above
61
X
X
X
X
X
61
X
X
X
X
61
% Below
39
X
X
X
X
X
39
X
X
X
X
39
% NS
0
X
X
X
X
X
0
X
X
X
X
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
13/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 10Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
X X X X X X31 33 31 4 35 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
X X X X X X34 36 34 4 38 0
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
X
31
X
33
X
31
X 4 X 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
X
2009
X
2010
X
2011
X
2012
X
2013
X
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
X X X X X X X X X X X X
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
6
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
% Prof. or Above
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
% Below
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
% NS
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
14/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 11Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
6 43 45 6 50 0
6 43 43 8 51 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
28 211 218 27 245 2
3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
6 6
43 43 45 43
6 80 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
9 43 42 7 49 0
8 41 42 9 51 0
3 47 41 8 49 0
6 37 46 11 57 0
5 45 46 4 50 0
6 43 45 6 50 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
33 165 161 27 188 0
39 206 211 44 255 0
15 223 194 38 232 0
27 176 218 52 270 0
29 236 244 20 264 1
28 211 218 27 245 2
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
49
2009
51
2010
49
2011
57
2012
50
2013
50
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
50
49
59
41
42
57
X X X
35
65
64
35
X X 16
84
35
65
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
486
239
247
3
7
3
232
235
1
5
38
188
% Prof. or Above
50
59
42
X
X
X
35
64
X
X
16
35
% Below
49
41
57
X
X
X
65
35
X
X
84
65
% NS
0
0
0
X
X
X
0
1
X
X
0
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
15/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 12Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
6 42 44 7 51 0
7 39 45 8 53 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
33 221 228 39 267 2
4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
6 7
42 3944 45
7 80 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
8 45 40 7 48 0
10 44 40 5 45 0
7 37 45 9 55 1
4 37 48 11 59 0
4 43 47 6 53 0
6 42 44 7 51 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
31 179 161 30 191 1
43 186 169 23 192 1
38 190 232 48 280 3
20 168 219 48 267 1
19 214 230 30 260 0
33 221 228 39 267 2
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
48
2009
45
2010
55
2011
59
2012
53
2013
51
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
51
49
61
39
43
56
X X X
29
70
71
28
X X 10
90
28
72
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
523
234
289
4
10
3
243
257
0
6
62
219
% Prof. or Above
51
61
43
X
X
X
29
71
X
X
10
28
% Below
49
39
56
X
X
X
70
28
X
X
90
72
% NS
0
0
1
X
X
X
0
0
X
X
0
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
16/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 13Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
5 36 50 9 58 1
5 37 48 9 57 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
23 183 252 44 296 5
3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
5 5
36 37
50 48
9 91 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
4 34 51 11 61 0
6 35 53 6 59 0
3 37 52 7 60 0
3 32 55 10 65 0
4 36 49 11 60 0
5 36 50 9 58 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
16 131 193 41 234 0
25 150 227 25 252 2
14 156 222 31 253 2
17 159 277 48 325 0
18 172 231 51 282 1
23 183 252 44 296 5
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
61
2009
59
2010
60
2011
65
2012
60
2013
58
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
58
41
66
33
51
48
X X X
38
61
79
20
X X 15
83
35
64
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
507
243
264
5
1
1
245
249
0
6
52
210
% Prof. or Above
58
66
51
X
X
X
38
79
X
X
15
35
% Below
41
33
48
X
X
X
61
20
X
X
83
64
% NS
1
1
1
X
X
X
1
1
X
X
2
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
17/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 14Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
3 33 55 9 64 1
4 38 49 9 58 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
14 153 258 40 298 3
2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
3 4
3338
5549
9 91 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
4 36 47 12 59 0
3 31 55 12 66 0
5 31 52 12 63 0
4 28 56 13 68 0
4 35 52 9 61 0
3 33 55 9 64 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
18 151 195 50 245 1
13 122 218 46 264 0
23 134 223 50 273 1
16 121 242 55 297 1
19 172 258 45 303 0
14 153 258 40 298 3
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
59
2009
66
2010
63
2011
68
2012
61
2013
64
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
64
36
75
25
54
46
X X X
45
54
81
18
X X
26
74
42
57
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
468
224
244
1
4
0
230
225
0
8
50
189
% Prof. or Above
64
75
54
X
X
X
45
81
X
X
26
42
% Below
36
25
46
X
X
X
54
18
X
X
74
57
% NS
1
1
0
X
X
X
1
0
X
X
0
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
18/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 15Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
2 29 55 13 68 1
3 35 47 15 61 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
11 144 274 64 338 6
1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
2 3
2935
5547
13 15
1 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
5 39 47 9 56 0
4 30 48 18 66 0
3 30 51 17 68 0
4 29 53 14 67 0
3 29 55 13 68 0
2 29 55 13 68 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
20 147 177 33 210 0
16 123 197 74 271 0
11 115 196 66 262 0
15 125 225 61 286 0
15 128 242 56 298 0
11 144 274 64 338 6
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
56
2009
66
2010
68
2011
67
2012
68
2013
68
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
68
31
70
29
66
33
X X X
48
51
89
11
X X 13
85
43
56
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
499
245
254
6
8
4
249
227
0
5
46
209
% Prof. or Above
68
70
66
X
X
X
48
89
X
X
13
43
% Below
31
29
33
X
X
X
51
11
X
X
85
56
% NS
1
2
1
X
X
X
2
1
X
X
2
2
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
19/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 16Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
4 34 54 7 61 0
3 40 47 9 56 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
19 151 240 30 270 1
1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
4 3
3440
5447
7 90 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
4 37 45 13 59 1
4 39 50 7 57 0
3 35 49 13 62 0
3 37 47 13 60 0
2 35 53 10 63 1
4 34 54 7 61 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
15 147 180 52 232 2
13 143 182 25 207 1
13 144 205 53 258 1
11 149 188 51 239 1
7 154 236 45 281 3
19 151 240 30 270 1
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
59
2009
57
2010
62
2011
60
2012
63
2013
61
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
61
39
69
31
55
45
X X X
45
54
77
23
X X 3
97
43
57
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
441
199
242
1
6
1
217
208
0
8
38
171
% Prof. or Above
61
69
55
X
X
X
45
77
X
X
3
43
% Below
39
31
45
X
X
X
54
23
X
X
97
57
% NS
0
0
0
X
X
X
0
0
X
X
0
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
20/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 17Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
3 37 51 8 59 1
3 40 47 8 55 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
15 164 227 34 261 3
1969 24862 28738 5144 33882 840
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
3 3
37 40
5147
8 81 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
8 52 36 3 40 1
2 43 46 6 52 4
6 44 39 5 45 5
5 36 47 9 56 3
3 42 48 5 53 2
3 37 51 8 59 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
29 192 134 13 147 4
7 169 183 23 206 14
26 183 164 22 186 21
20 158 206 38 244 13
12 189 217 23 240 8
15 164 227 34 261 3
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
40
2009
52
2010
45
2011
56
2012
53
2013
59
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
59
40
65
35
52
47
X X X
39
60
82
17
X X 10
88
40
59
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
443
239
204
2
6
4
231
195
0
5
50
208
% Prof. or Above
59
65
52
X
X
X
39
82
X
X
10
40
% Below
40
35
47
X
X
X
60
17
X
X
88
59
% NS
1
0
1
X
X
X
1
1
X
X
2
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
21/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 18Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
4 45 41 8 49 2
6 43 41 7 49 2
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
17 196 178 33 211 7
3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
4 6
45 43 41 41
8 72 2
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
8 45 40 5 45 1
7 49 40 3 42 2
9 41 38 9 47 3
6 47 39 4 43 3
3 42 48 6 54 1
4 45 41 8 49 2
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
35 186 166 21 187 5
26 186 150 11 161 6
35 163 150 34 184 11
24 181 149 17 166 12
14 175 200 25 225 3
17 196 178 33 211 7
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
45
2009
42
2010
47
2011
43
2012
54
2013
49
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
49
49
60
39
39
58
X X X
28
69
67
32
X X 10
85
24
73
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
431
203
228
6
4
0
193
221
1
6
39
168
% Prof. or Above
49
60
39
X
X
X
28
67
X
X
10
24
% Below
49
39
58
X
X
X
69
32
X
X
85
73
% NS
2
0
3
X
X
X
2
1
X
X
5
2
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
22/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 19Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
33 50 17 0 17 0
20 24 37 18 56 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
6 9 3 0 3 0
236 282 442 218 660 1
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
33
20
50
2417
37
0
18
0 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
14 33 40 14 53 0
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
19 13 50 19 69 0
32 11 47 11 58 0
33 50 17 0 17 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
6 14 17 6 23 0
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
3 2 8 3 11 0
6 2 9 2 11 0
6 9 3 0 3 0
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
53
2009
X
2010
X
2011
69
2012
58
2013
17
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
17
83
X X X X X 17
83
X X X X 17
83
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
18
6
12
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
3
18
% Prof. or Above
17
X
X
X
X
X
17
X
X
X
X
17
% Below
83
X
X
X
X
X
83
X
X
X
X
83
% NS
0
X
X
X
X
X
0
X
X
X
X
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
23/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 20Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
X X X X X X44 32 18 1 19 6
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
X X X X X X47 35 19 1 20 6
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
X
44
X
32
X
18
X 1 X6
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
X
2009
X
2010
X
2011
X
2012
X
2013
X
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
X X X X X X X X X X X X
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
6
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
% Prof. or Above
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
% Below
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
% NS
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
24/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 21Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
7 25 40 28 69 0
7 20 41 31 72 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
34 124 204 142 346 1
4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
7 7
2520
40 41
28 31
0 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
11 23 38 28 66 0
7 23 40 29 69 0
5 23 36 36 72 0
6 17 41 36 77 0
8 22 42 27 70 1
7 25 40 28 69 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
47 100 163 120 283 0
38 119 206 146 352 0
23 108 173 172 345 0
29 84 202 174 376 0
43 121 232 150 382 3
34 124 204 142 346 1
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
66
2009
69
2010
72
2011
77
2012
70
2013
69
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
69
31
68
32
69
31
X X X
54
45
83
17
X X
32
68
51
48
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
505
246
259
3
7
3
251
234
1
6
41
207
% Prof. or Above
69
68
69
X
X
X
54
83
X
X
32
51
% Below
31
32
31
X
X
X
45
17
X
X
68
48
% NS
0
0
0
X
X
X
0
0
X
X
0
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
25/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 22Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
8 23 47 22 69 0
8 20 43 28 72 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
44 120 249 115 364 1
5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
8 8
23 20
47 43
2228
0 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
10 25 45 20 66 0
10 20 43 27 69 0
7 19 40 34 74 0
5 18 45 33 77 0
7 19 43 30 73 0
8 23 47 22 69 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
40 101 186 83 269 0
43 87 182 114 296 1
34 99 207 172 379 1
23 82 205 150 355 0
36 96 215 148 363 1
44 120 249 115 364 1
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
66
2009
69
2010
74
2011
77
2012
73
2013
69
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
69
31
72
28
66
34
X X X
50
49
87
13
X X
31
69
48
52
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
529
234
295
4
9
3
250
257
0
6
62
225
% Prof. or Above
69
72
66
X
X
X
50
87
X
X
31
48
% Below
31
28
34
X
X
X
49
13
X
X
69
52
% NS
0
0
0
X
X
X
0
0
X
X
0
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
26/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 23Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
9 27 39 25 64 0
9 25 36 29 65 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
44 137 196 129 325 2
5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
9 9
27 25
39 36
25 29
0 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
7 26 40 27 67 0
11 27 36 26 62 1
7 28 35 30 64 0
8 21 36 35 71 0
8 28 39 25 64 0
9 27 39 25 64 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
27 98 154 102 256 0
45 116 154 109 263 3
30 121 148 126 274 0
40 106 180 176 356 0
37 133 184 119 303 0
44 137 196 129 325 2
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
67
2009
62
2010
64
2011
71
2012
64
2013
64
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
64
36
64
36
64
35
X X X
44
55
84
16
X X23
77
41
59
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
508
244
264
5
1
1
246
249
0
6
52
211
% Prof. or Above
64
64
64
X
X
X
44
84
X
X
23
41
% Below
36
36
35
X
X
X
55
16
X
X
77
59
% NS
0
0
1
X
X
X
1
0
X
X
0
0
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
27/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 24Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
10 25 38 27 65 1
12 26 35 27 62 0
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
45 117 177 126 303 3
7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
10 12
25 26
38 3527 27
1 0
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
13 26 38 22 60 0
9 24 40 27 67 0
11 24 44 22 65 0
9 27 34 29 63 0
13 28 37 22 59 0
10 25 38 27 65 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
55 109 159 92 251 0
37 96 159 107 266 0
46 102 188 94 282 1
41 118 150 126 276 0
63 138 182 111 293 0
45 117 177 126 303 3
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
60
2009
67
2010
65
2011
63
2012
59
2013
65
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
65
35
67
32
62
37
X X X
45
54
84
16
X X
34
64
45
54
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
468
224
244
1
4
0
230
225
0
8
50
189
% Prof. or Above
65
67
62
X
X
X
45
84
X
X
34
45
% Below
35
32
37
X
X
X
54
16
X
X
64
54
% NS
1
0
1
X
X
X
1
0
X
X
2
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
28/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 25Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
13 26 30 29 60 1
14 30 28 27 55 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
66 128 151 147 298 7
8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
13 14
2630 30 28 29 27
1 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
21 41 27 11 38 0
12 32 29 27 56 0
10 30 41 19 60 0
11 30 35 23 58 0
15 34 26 25 51 0
13 26 30 29 60 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
78 154 103 42 145 0
49 130 118 111 229 2
40 117 159 72 231 0
48 129 149 100 249 0
64 152 116 109 225 0
66 128 151 147 298 7
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
38
2009
56
2010
60
2011
58
2012
51
2013
60
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
60
39
58
41
62
37
X X X
43
55
77
22
X X7
91
38
60
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
499
245
254
6
8
4
249
227
0
5
46
209
% Prof. or Above
60
58
62
X
X
X
43
77
X
X
7
38
% Below
39
41
37
X
X
X
55
22
X
X
91
60
% NS
1
2
1
X
X
X
2
1
X
X
2
1
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
29/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 26Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
17 28 30 24 54 1
19 29 29 23 51 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
75 124 131 108 239 3
1 1577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
17 1928 29 30 29 24 23
1 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
20 33 31 15 46 0
15 28 38 19 57 0
13 25 36 25 61 0
12 24 40 24 64 0
19 30 30 21 51 0
17 28 30 24 54 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
80 132 123 59 182 1
56 101 138 68 206 0
55 106 149 106 255 2
48 96 161 95 256 1
85 133 133 94 227 0
75 124 131 108 239 3
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Year
2008
46
2009
57
2010
61
2011
64
2012
51
2013
54
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStudentsP+
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
Group
54
45
50
49
57
42
X X X
34
65
74
26
X X
8
92
35
64
Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Groups
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Asian
BlkAfAm
Hisp
Wht
HwPacIs
Mult
IEP
ELL
Ns
441
199
242
1
6
1
217
208
0
8
38
171
% Prof. or Above
54
50
57
X
X
X
34
74
X
X
8
35
% Below
45
49
42
X
X
X
65
26
X
X
92
64
% NS
1
1
1
X
X
X
1
0
X
X
0
2
8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum
30/265
2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District
Page 27Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math (in percentages)
District and State
Eagle County Re 50
Colorado
Percentages
U PP P A PA NS
28 38 23 10 33 1
30 30 24 15 39 1
Ns
U PP P A PA NS
122 170 102 46 148 3
18263 18670 14741 9176 23917 692
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,
Inc.
Percentage
ofStu
dents
0
20
40
60
80
100
Proficiency Levels
28 3038
3023 24
1015
1 1
U PP P A NS
Eagle County Re 50 Colorado
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)
Years
2008
2009
2010
2011