TB and Poverty Gillian Mann
Oct 22, 2014
TB and Poverty
Gillian Mann
2Poverty and TB
Overview
• What do we mean by poverty and vulnerability?• Higher risk of TB among the poor• Lower access to TB services for the poor• Is TB unusual with regard to poverty?• What can be done?• Where is there more information?
3Poverty and TB
The concepts of poverty and vulnerability
Poverty
• is more than economic poverty (living on ≤US$ 1 per day)
• encompasses lack of opportunities, voice and representation, and vulnerability to shocks
• is a major determinant of vulnerability to disease – especially TB
4Poverty and TB
The relationship between poverty and TB
The poor have
• higher risk of infection
• higher prevalence of disease
• worse outcome of disease
5Poverty and TB
Poor people face higher risk
• TB has been long associated with poverty.
• Seventeen of the twenty-two countries that account for the 80% world’s TB burden are classified as low income.
• Poor and vulnerable people are much more likely to suffer from TB due to socioeconomic factors
• Within countries the prevalence of TB is higher among vulnerable groups such as poor people and the homeless
•Indigenous peoples suffer higher rates of TB than non-indigenous peoples in the same countries, e.g.
– Canada: TB rates are approximately 10times higher among First Nations peoples and up to 90 times higher among the Inuit;
–New Zealand, Pacific Islanders and Maoris have a 22.3 and 10.5 risk rate.
–Kalaallit Nunaat, residents have a risk rate of 45 times that of Danish people
6Poverty and TB
Poor People face higher risk
• Poverty increases the risk of TB infection and disease and TB disease deepens poverty.
• Deprivation associated with poverty, in terms of nutritional deficiencies and weak immune systems, overcrowded housing and lack of access to healthcare, contribute to risk of infection
• Other factors associated with poverty, such as smoking, are high risk factors for TB
7Poverty and TB
Access to Services
8Poverty and TB
Access to services
• Case detection in many countries is low because the poor cannot access TB services
Active TB
Symptoms
recognised
Health care utilisation
Diagnosis
Notification
Infected
Patie
nt d
elay
Health system delay
Patient delay
9Poverty and TB
Area 18 Area 56 Missing
Population 10,677 22,369
Pop density (pop/sq.km) 3,568 3,158
Chronic cough cases 254 182
Smear positive TB cases 41 44
Chronic cough/100,000 2379 814 1565
Smear positive TB/100,000 384 197 187
Actual number of missing chronic cough cases – 350
Actual number of missing smear positive TB cases – 42
Half of all smear positive cases of TB may be missing from the poorest areas
How do we know the poor are not getting access?
10Poverty and TB
Access to services
• The poor face significant costs and delays in accessing TB services; the burden of TB in their communities continues to increase
• The process of accessing care is impoverishing
• Papers: Kemp et al. Can Malawi's poor afford free TB services? Patient and
household costs associated with a TB diagnosis in Lilongwe. Bull World Health Organ 2006; 85(8)
Nhlema-Simwaka et al. Developing a socio-economic measure to monitor access to tuberculosis services in urban Lilongwe, Malawi. IJTLD 2007; 11(1):65-71
11Poverty and TB
Costs of a diagnosis for poor and non poor
All Patients All poor
All non-poor
Direct Costs of Pathway to CareFees and Drugs 7.6 6.6 9.8Transport 3.4 2.6 5.6Food 2 1.8 2.3
Total Direct Costs 13 11 17.7
Opportunity CostsDays Lost 22.1 21.9 23.2Mean income (IHS) $0.71 $0.21 $1.23
Income lost during care seeking 15.8 4.6 28.7
Total Costs $29 $16 $46Total costs as % of monthly income 134% 248% 124%
% income not spent on food 64.8% 42.5% 70.2%
Total costs as % of monthly income after food expenditure 206% 584% 176%
Kemp JR, Mann GH et al Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 2007 85; 580-585.
12Poverty and TB
DOTS since2002
DOTS since1992
13Poverty and TB
People drop out of the diagnostic process: audit in Lilongwe, Feb-Aug 1995
37% of people dropped out of 37% of people dropped out of the diagnostic processthe diagnostic process
499 suspects499 suspects
466 “on-spot”466 “on-spot”
423“early morning”423“early morning”
413“next day spot”413“next day spot”
404 result available404 result available
316 collected result316 collected result
14Poverty and TB
• Inequality: Unequal outcomes; unequal access to health services• Inequity: Inequalities that are unjust
• In 56 low and middle income countries (c. 50% of the world’s population) health inequality is rampant. In relation to the richest 20%, on average the poorest 20% :
•Are twice as likely to have an infant die•Are three times as likely to see their children suffer stunted growth•Have an adolescent fertility rate three times higher
• Health Sector contributes to this:•A poor pregnant woman is more than three times as likely to deliver at
home•A poor child is half as likely to receive full basic immunisation•A poor woman of childbearing age is 40% less likely to practice
contraception
Inequity in the Health Sector
15Poverty and TB
Distribution of Funding
10.1%
13.4%
25.6%
33.1%
17.8%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Poorest20%
2nd Middle 20% 4th Richest20%
Income Quitiles
Sh
are
of
the
Pu
blic
Su
bsi
dy
Source: NCAER, New Delhi, India (Yazbeck A, Benefit incidence Analysis, Reaching the Poor 2004)
16Poverty and TB
Use of Level of Care: India
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Poorest20%
2nd Middle20%
4th Richest20%
Hospital
PHC & Below
Source: Yazbeck A, Benefit incidence Analysis, Reaching the Poor 2004
17Poverty and TB
What can be done?
18Poverty and TB
A trial of transferring up-front, out-of-pocket expenditure from patients to TB dispensaries (funded through New Cooperative Medical Scheme in Hunan Province, China)
19Poverty and TB 19
Result: outpatient costs significantly reduced
20Poverty and TB
Hurdles faced by an average rural resident accessing TB treatment in Malawi
Source:Gillian MannPhD ThesisUniversity of Liverpool2008
NB: no user fees in public health facilities
21Poverty and TB
Potential effect of front-loading of sputum collection for smear microscopy
22Poverty and TB
Potential effect of frontloading with same-day issue of results
23Poverty and TB
What information is there: Guidelines for NTPs
1. Identification of the poor and vulnerable groups in the country/region served by the national TB control programme
2. Identification of the barriers to accessing TB services faced by the poor and vulnerable groups in the country/region
3. Identification of potential actions to overcome the barriers to access
4. Identification of situations and population groups requiring special consideration
5. Harnessing resources for pro-poor TB services
6. Assessment of the pro-poor performance of the national TB control programme and the impact of pro-poor measures
http://www.stoptb.org/tbandpoverty/steps.aspWHO/HTM/TB/2005.352May 2005
24Poverty and TB
Summary
• Poor people are more likely to have TB and less likely to receive care
• We need to be sure that TB programmes are finding ways to reach the poor and to facilitate access to care
• We need to make sure new tools are accessible to poor people
25Poverty and TB
Thank You
26Poverty and TB
44
25
45
49 43
46
47
3
35
36
56
23
38
50
57
24
7
1
29
29
10
8
22
18
34
21
30
6
5
12
37
39
14
433
41
16
28
20
17
32 1315
48
40
3142
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 Kilometers
Percentage of Householdswith Private Piped Water
Private Piped Water
Source: 1998 National Census
0 - 20
21 - 40
41 - 60
61 - 80
81 - 100
Poverty indicators/area– Lilongwe (Malawi)
44
25
45
49 43
46
47
3
35
36
56
23
38
50
57
24
7
1
29
29
10
8
22
18
34
21
30
6
5
12
37
39
14
433
41
16
28
20
17
32 1315
48
40
3142
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 Kilometers
Population %with Secondary Education
Pop < 100
Secondary Education
Source: 1998 National Census
0 - 6
7 - 23
25 - 30
31 - 47
27Poverty and TB
44
25
45
49 43
46
47
3
35
36
56
23
38
50
57
24
7
1
29
29
10
8
22
18
34
21
30
6
5
12
37
39
14
433
41
16
28
20
17
32 1315
48
40
3142
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 Kilometers
Percentage of Householdswith Private Piped Water
Private Piped Water
Source: 1998 National Census
0 - 20
21 - 40
41 - 60
61 - 80
81 - 100
Poverty indicators/area – Lilongwe (Malawi)
44
25
45
49 43
46
47
3
35
36
56
23
38
50
57
24
7
1
29
29
10
8
22
18
34
21
30
6
5
12
37
39
14
433
41
16
28
20
17
32 1315
48
40
3142
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 Kilometers
Population %with Secondary Education
Pop < 100
Secondary Education
Source: 1998 National Census
0 - 6
7 - 23
25 - 30
31 - 47
Mitsiriza
Ngwenya
28Poverty and TB
44
25
45
49 43
46
47
3
35
36
56
23
38
50
57
24
7
1
29
29
10
8
22
18
34
21
30
6
5
12
37
39
14
433
41
16
28
20
17
32 1315
48
40
3142
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 Kilometers
Percentage of Householdswith Private Piped Water
Private Piped Water
Source: 1998 National Census
0 - 20
21 - 40
41 - 60
61 - 80
81 - 100
Poverty indicators/area – Lilongwe (Malawi)
44
25
45
49 43
46
47
3
35
36
56
23
38
50
57
24
7
1
29
29
10
8
22
18
34
21
30
6
5
12
37
39
14
433
41
16
28
20
17
32 1315
48
40
3142
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 Kilometers
Population %with Secondary Education
Pop < 100
Secondary Education
Source: 1998 National Census
0 - 6
7 - 23
25 - 30
31 - 47
Mitsiriza
Ngwenya
29Poverty and TB
An example of a quantitative proxy measure
B. Nhlema-Simwaka et al, IJTLD 2007;11(1):65-71
30Poverty and TB
An example of a qualitative matrix
B. Nhlema-Simwaka et al, IJTLD 2007;11(1):65-71
31Poverty and TB
Household Poverty indicators
Variable Coefficient t-statistic Household cooks over collected firewood -.0.174 3.58* Household size -0.283 19.12* Household size squared 0.015 11.93* Education level of household head 0.078 6.65* No of salaried household members 0.098 4.11* Household owns a bicycle 0.153 6.93* Household owns a car or motor cycle 0.693 8.16* Household owns a fridge 0.591 5.69* Purchased sugar in last 2 weeks 0.152 7.06* Total acreage cultivated 0.029 6.70* Household grows tobacco 0.105 4.03* Household owns a bed 0.263 11.85* No of cattle owned 0.013 3.1* Household grows hybrid maize 0.076 3.28* Nkhata Bay 0.123 -0.92 Dedza 0.030 -0.24 Mchinji -0.052 -0.31