1 Architecture Technology Education Architecture of Learning Environments E19.2017 (Image: Zarazoga Digital Mile, accessed from http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/zaragoza-digital-mile.html)
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
ArchitectureTechnologyEducation
Architecture of Learning Environments E19.2017
(Image: Zarazoga Digital Mile, accessed from http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/zaragoza-digital-mile.html)
WEEK 5Tags, Tagsonomy, Folksonomy, Taxonomy
Comparing how tags work in two video analysis technologies
3
What are they? Open question…. Discussion….
When do we first learn about “tags”??
In consumer projects, Lotus Magellen, 1988, “allowed for annotations of documents, and objects in one’s hard-drive to ease finding and refinding them.
Mid-1990s Compuserve had “tagging: for objects uploaded into its forum libraries.”
from vanderwal.net
4
Folksonomies: Tagging
Semantic tags generated by individuals to make meaning of information
---allow personal connections to meaning
But is this about categorization? Bottom-up, socially generated?---Peter Morville quotes Dave Sifry:
“Intelligence is provided by real people from the bottom-up to aid social discovery. And with the right tag search and navigation, folksonomy outperforms more structured approaches to classification.” (http://semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000057.php)
5
Tagging- Social TaggingTags have 3 points of information (from Vanderwal.net) :
1-The person tagging
2-Object being tagged
3-The tag used on the object
Emphasis on Social Aspect:
---Creating social connections
---Sharing meanings, information
6
According to vanderwal.net:
“Tagging did not capture identity and was therefore not useful.”
IS THIS ACCURATE??
In research practices this was not so!
7
Star Notes (circa 1988)
HyperCard tool based on tagging for building like video groupings
- Finding like clips- Seemed like magic!
Learning Constellations (circa 1989)
Tags were made on one computer (no Internet)Multiple users could tag and create their “descriptors”See each others descriptors and comments and compare them.
8
Constellations (circa 1992-3)
2/20/08previous next
Imag[e]ine:
Perspectivity TechnologiesTheories
Video Tools
Video Cases
Background
Epistemology
Cultural Epistemology
POV Web Site
Constellations
WebConstellations
Middle School
Junior High
Teacher Ed & Grad
ISP Undergraduate
EmergingTheories & Tools
QuickTime™ and aCinepak decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
9
Theories
Video Tools
Video Cases
Background
Epistemology
Cultural Epistemology
POV Web Site
Constellations
WebConstellations
Middle School
Junior High
Teacher Ed & Grad
ISP Undergraduate
EmergingTheories & Tools
Theories
Video Tools
Video Cases
Background
Epistemology
Cultural Epistemology
POV Web Site
Constellations
WebConstellations
Middle School
Junior High
Teacher Ed & Grad
ISP Undergraduate
EmergingTheories & Tools
Theories
Video Tools
Video Cases
Background
Epistemology
Cultural Epistemology
POV Web Site
Constellations
WebConstellations
Middle School
Junior High
Teacher Ed & Grad
ISP Undergraduate
EmergingTheories & Tools
13
Orion, 1999
14
What was learned?
Descriptors is still a better word than tagging…
Tags need to be embedded in the clips.
MOST IMPORTANT:
TOP DOWN TAGGING?
BOTTOM UP TAGGING?
How does this come together?
Related Documents
