Top Banner
JOURNAL CLUB Vikraman.S
32
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Task group report 135 cyberknie

JOURNAL CLUB

Vikraman.S

Page 2: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Quality Assurance for Cyberknife

Page 3: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Questions ?

Page 4: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Questions ? • Mould ?

• Reference CT Marker ?

• Patient Setup ?

• Patient Collision system ?

• Isocentre ?

• SSD ?

• Field Size ?

• Reference field size ?

• Dosimetry ?

• Beam Data ?

• QA ?

• Setup verification ?

• 3D Cone beam CT verification ?

• DRR Verification ?

• Delivery QA ?

• PDD,TPR,Output Factors,Kq ?

Page 5: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Introduction

• Fundamental of SRS is to accurate placement of intended radiation dose .

• Small errors can lead to inaccurate estimate of accumulate dose

• Consist of Linear accelerator, Manipulator arms and couch/Robotic couch

• Manipulator arms calibrated to direct the beams at the intersection of two orthogonal beams.

• Movements of the robotic manipulator controlled by computer in turn technologist

• TPS – Montecarlo /Ray searching ,Inverse optimization

• Isocentre /Non Isocentre

Page 6: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Synchrony™

camera

Treatment couch

Linear

accelerator

Manipulator

Image

detectors

X-ray sources

Targeting System

Robotic Delivery System

Page 7: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Physicist

Page 8: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Record Keeping

• Quality Assurance and Quality control

• Good record keeping can increase work efficiency and reduce the risk of making errors

• Recommended – Every QA test there should be written guideline which clearly defines the objective ,lists the action levels for the test and corrective actions to be taken when these levels are exceeded.

• Essential to keep hand written /Electronic record in a well organized file

• Clear definition of steps for action levels

Page 9: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Terminology

• AQA – Auto QA

• DQA- Delivery QA

• E2E – End to End test

• EMO – Emergency motion off

• EPO – Emergency power off

• Geometric Isocentre – A point in space defined by the position of isocrystal

• Treatment Isocentre – common crossing point of cyberknife beams and need not to be geometric isocentre

• Isocrystal - A light sensitive detector of about 1.5 mm diameter mounted at the tip of rigid post.

Page 10: Task group report 135 cyberknie
Page 11: Task group report 135 cyberknie
Page 12: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Collision safeguards

• Robot and Room Safety – Design ,Installation and quality assurance

• Electrical Safety / Patient and Robot movement

• Modified industrial robot to support and position a linear accelerator weighing 160 Kg.

• There are no inherent mechanical restrictions on robot movement

Page 13: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Zones of motion restrictions

• Mock Treatment using - Simulation/Demonstration mode

Page 14: Task group report 135 cyberknie

EPO & EMO

Page 15: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Daily QA

• Warm up 2000 MU for closed chambers

• Warm up 6000 MU for open chambers

• 4 Hr downtime needs warm up

• Daily output measurements by farmer chamber with buildup

• Field size & MU distance ? 80 cm

• Recommended to keep incorrect collimator to check the interlock

Page 16: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Monthly QA

• Output

• Energy Constancy

• No Flatness

• Symmetry - largest collimator to be used

• Symmetry should be measured at a depth of 5 cm in INPLANE & CROSSPLANE

• Radiochromic film – 10,15,25 mm radii

• 1 % tolerance with TPS commissioning

Page 17: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Annual QA • Detector ?

• Protocol ?

• Reference field ?

• KQ

• Equivalent field size

• TPR 20/10

• BJR

• 0.3 % error by using 0.68 Beam Quality

• SSD 100 cm

• 6 cm equivalent square field size 6.75 X 6.75 mm

Page 18: Task group report 135 cyberknie

• Detector for absolute calibration is > 10 -25mm active length

• TLD program is recommended

• 1mm accuracy with laser central laser

• Task group recommends laser less than 1mm accuracy

• Gimbal Mounted laser system helps to adjust laser with less than 0.5 mm accuracy

• Techniques to adjust to less 0.5 mm accuracy =

Adjust the laser at 160 cm SAD to 1mm = 0.5 mm accuracy at 80 cm SAD

• TPR

• PDD

• OCR

• Output for different collimators

• Diode detectors

• For < 2cm chambers, micro chambers, not recommended for output factors

• MU linearity to be checked < 1%

Page 19: Task group report 135 cyberknie

IMAGING ? • No recommendations for IMAGING QA from Accuray,

• No Baseline for IMAGING QA apart from ATP

• Task group recommends

Imaging geometry

X ray generators and sources

Amorphous Silicon detector

Patient dose due to image guidance

Dose delivery accuracy depends on IMAGING

Imaging core technology for frameless SRS

Page 20: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Fixed Imaging

• Fixed sources

• Fixed detectors

Page 21: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Imaging geometry

Page 22: Task group report 135 cyberknie

X ray generators and sources

• 2.5 mm Al filter

• 40 -125 KV

• 25-300 mA

• 1-500 ms

• AAPM Report no 14 part 3 and No 74 of Task group 12

Page 23: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Amorphous Silicon detectors

• AAPM Report No 75 for Silicon detectors

• 1024 x 1024 resolution

• 41 x 41 cm2

Page 24: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Patient dose due to image guidance

• G4 Source to Isocentre separation = 225 cm

• Isocentre to detector distance = 141 cm

• Active area = 41 x 41 cm2

• 0.1 – 0.70 mGy per image .

Exit dose & Entrance dose ?

AAPM Report No 75 is recommended to estimate the Entrance dose

Page 25: Task group report 135 cyberknie

TPS • Montecarlo

• Ray tracing

• Software Testing based on AAPM report 53

• Secondary MU is part of QA as per AAPM report 114

• 2 % tolerance with cumulative of all beams at reference point

• 20 % lower dose in MC vs. Ray tracing ( Depends on the tumor size and location)

• Custom CT model

• Inhomgeneity corrections

• Modelled output factors tolerance is 0.5 % ( SRS)

• Recommended to use Anthromorphic phantoms with films for DQA

• Delivery QA is recommended for every patient for 90 % pass rate with 2% & 2mm gamma criteria.

• Aim for less peripheral dose while planning

Page 26: Task group report 135 cyberknie
Page 27: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Tracking System

• Bony Structure tracking

• Fiducial Tracking

• Soft tissue Tracking

Bony - 6D Skull tracking & Xsight Spine

Soft - X Sight Lung without need of Fiducial

Fiducial – With marker

Synchrony

In Tempo Adaptive imaging

Page 28: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Auto QA • Isocentre targeting Accuracy

• AQA Phantom

• Daily QA

• CT Scan 2cm

Acrylic phantom

replaced with

Same size of Metal Phantom

• Import into TPS

• Expose to AP & Lat

• 1mm tolerance from baseline

Page 29: Task group report 135 cyberknie

E2E

Page 30: Task group report 135 cyberknie

DQA

Page 31: Task group report 135 cyberknie

Nodes & Paths

Page 32: Task group report 135 cyberknie

•Questions ?