Top Banner
TAMA binary inspiral event s earch Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003
20

TAMA binary inspiral event search

Jan 17, 2016

Download

Documents

AOIFE

TAMA binary inspiral event search. Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan). 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003. Coalescing compact binaries. Neutron stars Black holes. Inspiral phase of coalescing compact binaries are main target because - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: TAMA binary inspiral event search

TAMA binary inspiral event search

Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan)

3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003

Page 2: TAMA binary inspiral event search

Coalescing compact binaries

Neutron starsBlack holes

Inspiral phase of coalescing compact binaries are main target because

Expected event rate of NS-NS merger: a few within 200Mpc /year

Well known waveform, etc.

Possibility of MACHO black holes

Page 3: TAMA binary inspiral event search

TAMA Binary inspiral search

1. Neutron star binary search

2. TAMA-LISM coincident event search for mass range (onestep search)

3. Lower mass

4. Higher mass

1 2M M

1 2M M

0.2M

10M

Page 4: TAMA binary inspiral event search

Matched filter• Detector outputs:

:  known gravitational waveform (template)

: noise.

• Outputs of matched filter:

• noise spectrum density

• signal to noise ratio

• Matched filtering is the process to find optimal

parameters which realize

s t Ah t n t( ) ( ) ( ) h t( )n t( )

( , , ,...)~( )

~( )

( )

*

m m ts f h f

S fdfc

n1 2 2 z

max ( , , ,...), , ,...m m t

cc

m m t1 2

1 2FH IK

SNR = / 2

Post-Newtonian approximation

( )nS f

Page 5: TAMA binary inspiral event search

Matched filtering analysis

tRead data

FFT of dataApply transfer function

Conversion to stain equivalent data

Evaluate noise spectrum near the data( )nS f

        ( , , )ct M

max ( , , ) c

ct

t M

( 25 )ct ms

52 sec

Event list(only 7 events)

        2( , , )ct M

( 7)if

,max ( , , )

c

Mt M

2 ( / )S N

Page 6: TAMA binary inspiral event search

TAMA events and Galactic event

Test signals

selection will produce loss of strong S/N events

2

2/ 16 T

AM

A e

vent

s

Page 7: TAMA binary inspiral event search

2

Search Result TAMA DT6

Page 8: TAMA binary inspiral event search

2/

Log

10[N

umbe

r of

eve

nts]

2/ 16

Page 9: TAMA binary inspiral event search

Upper limit to the Galactic event rate

N

T •N:  Upper limit to the average number of events

over certain threshold

•T:  Length of data [hours]

• :   Detection efficiency

Page 10: TAMA binary inspiral event search

Galactic event simulationWe perform Galactic event simulation to estimate detection efficiency

Assume binary neutron stars distribution in our Galaxy

2 20/ 2 / zR R Z hdN e e RdRdZ

0 4.8 kpc

1 kpcz

R

h

•Give a time during DT6

•Determine mass, position, inclination angle, phase by random numbers

•Give a test signal into real data

•Search

•Make event lists and estimate detection efficiency

Mass : distribute uniformly between 1 2M

Page 11: TAMA binary inspiral event search

Galactic event detection efficiency

2/ 16 0.23

Page 12: TAMA binary inspiral event search

Upper limit to the event rate: Poisson statistics

•Threshold ( )

•Expected number of fake events over threshold : Nbg=0.1

•Observed number of events over threshold: Nobs=0

Assuming Poisson distribution for the number of real/fake events

over the threshold,

we obtain upper limit to the expected number of real events from( )

0

0

( )

!1

( )

!

obsbg

obsbg

nn Nx N bg

nnn N

N bg

n

x Ne

nCL

Ne

n

N=2.3  (C.L.=90%)

2/ 16

Page 13: TAMA binary inspiral event search

Upper limit to the Galactic event rate

threshold=16 ( ~ S/N=11)

(fake event rate=0.8/year)

Efficiency

•We also obtain upper limit to the average number of events over threshold by standard Poisson statistics analysis

N=2.3   (C.L.=90%)

•Observation time T = 1039 hours

0.23

0.0095 [1/ hour] ( . . 90%)N

C LT

c.f.    Caltech 40m : 0.5/hour    (C.L.=90%)        Allen et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1498 (1999).

Page 14: TAMA binary inspiral event search

TAMA DT7: 2002.8.31 ~ 2002.9.2

Best Sensitivity:

DT7 analysis

213.3 10 / Hz

Page 15: TAMA binary inspiral event search

DT7 event lists

These results will be used for TAMA-LIGO coincidence analysis.

23.7 hours data

Page 16: TAMA binary inspiral event search
Page 17: TAMA binary inspiral event search

2

Divide frequency region into bins.Test whether the contribution to from each bins agree with that expected from chirp signal

fminf1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fmax

1 2 3 4 5

FHG

IKJ z( , )

~( )~

( )

( )

*

s hs f h f

S fdf

n

2

22

2

2 2

1

i

i i

i i i i i

( )

( ) ,

chi square

Page 18: TAMA binary inspiral event search

[1.09minutes]

max

min

1/ 27 / 3

4( )

f

fn

fdf

S f

min max100Hz, f 2500Hzf TAMA DT6 all 8/1 ~ 9/20/2001

Variation of Noise power (1 minute average)

Page 19: TAMA binary inspiral event search

max

min

1/ 27 / 3

4( )

f

fn

fdf

S f

min max100Hz, f 2500Hzf LISM DT6 9/3 ~ 9/17/2001

Variation of Noise power (1 minute average)

[1.09minutes]

Page 20: TAMA binary inspiral event search

•Binary inspiral search : one step search (Tagoshi, Tatsumi,Takahashi)

TAMA-LISM coincidence

(Takahashi,Tagoshi,Tatsumi)

two step search (Tagoshi, Tanaka)

•Binary inspiral search using Wavelet: (Kanda)

•Continuous wave from known pulsar: (Soida, Ando)

•Burst wave search: (Ando)

•Noise veto analysis: (Kanda)

•Calibration: (Tatsumi, Telada,…)

•Interferometer online diagnostic: (Ando,…)

•BH ringdown search, Stochastic background search, etc. will be done.

•Two new post-docs (Tsunesasa(NAOJ),Nakano(Osaka))

TAMA data analysis activity