Top Banner
Yoshitaro Takaesu U. of Tokyo Determination of mass hierarchy with medium baseline reactor neutrino experiments.
17

Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Apr 13, 2017

Download

Science

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Yoshitaro TakaesuU. of Tokyo

Determination of mass hierarchy with medium baseline reactor neutrino

experiments.

Page 2: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Reactor neutrino experiment

νe

Detector

Reactors

6 × 1023 νe/ 3GW/ 15min

2

PMT

Inside Detector (Inverse Beta Decay)

Page 3: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Reactor neutrino experiment

νe

Detector

Reactors

6 × 1023 νe/ 3GW/ 15min

3

Page 4: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Topics on medium baseline reactor ex.

4

• Optimum baselines

• Energy resolution (Energy scale uncertainty)

• Multiple reactor effects

• Geo neutrino

• Synergy with Long Baseline experiments

• Statistical test of hypothesis

• Fourier analysis vs. chi^2 analysis

• Nuclear recoil effect

etc…

Page 5: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

survival prob. (Pee)

5

L ~ 1km

MH independent current reactor experiment

[DayaBay: Neutrino2014]

MH

[Minakata,Nunokawa,Parke,Funchal: hep-ph/0701151]

Page 6: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Sensitivity to the Mass hierarchy

The typical sensitivity curve of this experiment

6

Page 7: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

chi^2 analysisWe define

Naively, the significance of this rejection is , but…(∆ χ2)min σ

NHIH

Not appropreate for the MH determination

c.f.) Qian et.al. arXiv: 1210.3651

Evslin et.al. arXiv: 1305.5150

NH is true: tends to be Positive.

IH is true: tends to be Negative.

IH is rejectedNH is rejected

NH is true case

7

Page 8: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Energy Resolution

8

Page 9: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Effect of Energy resolution

16.5GW 18kton 5yrs (RENO-50)Current value

NH

δE

E=

a

E / MeV

2

+ b2

9

[Ge,Hagiwara,Okamura,Takaesu: 1210.8141]

Page 10: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

How to achieve better Energy Resolution?

Increase the photo-electron (p.e.)detected by PMT.

p.e.~ 200 pe/MeV ~ 1000 pe/MeV

Ex)

• Increase PMT coverage

• Increase QE of PMT

• More transparent LS•More Light yield

10

~ 6% ~ 3%

Page 11: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

11

[L.Wen: Neutrino 2014]

Page 12: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Multiple Reactor Effect

12

Page 13: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

E. Ciuffoli, J. Evslin, X. Zhang: 1302.0624Y-F. Li, J. Cao, Y. Wang, L. Zhan: 1303.6733

ΔL = L1 – L2

Reactor1

Multiple Reactor Effect

L1 L2

13

Reactor1 + Reactor2

Page 14: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

multi-cores

Multiple Reactor Effect: RENO-50 case 16.5GW

18kton 5yrs

a = 3%, b = 0.5%δE

E=

a√

E

2

+ b2

(∆ χ2)min

All Reactors50 km

14

250m

[Y.Takaesu: Internationalworkshop on RENO-50]

Page 15: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

15

[L.Wen: Neutrino 2014]

Page 16: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

Geo-neutrino BG

16

KamLAND: 38.3 +- 10 TNU [1/(10^32 proton*yrs)]

Borexino: 38.8 +- 12 TNU

[Gando et.al 2011, Nature Geosci.]

[Ranucci: Neutorino 2014]

36 GW, 20 kton, 5 years, Eres=3% (JUNO)

arXiv:1006.1113

Page 17: Talk at Neutrino conference, Kyoto

SummaryFuture Reactor neutrino Experiment for MH determination

50km is the optimum baseline length

For > 3-sigma determination within 5 years (15GW 20kton)

3% of Energy resolution is required.

(Energy Scale uncertainty should be controlled carefully

arxiv:0901.2976, 1208.1551, 1308.0591)

Multiple reactor effect significantly affects the sensitivity.

Geo-neutrino may also become concern.

17