DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS NOVEMBER 2007 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................................... i LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................... LIST OF ACRONYMS - 1 VOLUME I 1. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ...................................................................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 PROPOSED ACTION................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ................................................................... 1-2 1.4 FUTUREGEN PROJECT .......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.1 FutureGen Project Technology.................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.2 FutureGen Project Objectives...................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT .............................................. 1-5 1.5.1 NEPA Scoping Process ............................................................................................... 1-5 1.5.2 Public Scoping Comments Received........................................................................... 1-7 1.5.3 Agency Decision-Making Process............................................................................... 1-8 1.6 PUBLIC HEARINGS.............................................................................................................. 1-10 1.7 SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES IN THE EIS ............................................................... 1-13 2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................... 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ...................................................................... 2-1 2.3 NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................. 2-3 2.4 SITE ALTERNATIVES.............................................................................................................. 2-3 2.4.1 Mattoon Site ................................................................................................................ 2-4 2.4.2 Tuscola Site ................................................................................................................. 2-9 2.4.3 Jewett Site ................................................................................................................. 2-15 2.4.4 Odessa Site ................................................................................................................ 2-21 2.4.5 New Options from Site Proponents’ Best and Final Offers .................................... 2-28 2.4.6 Alternatives Eliminated From Further Consideration ........................................... 2-40 2.4.7 Technology Options Eliminated from Further Consideration ................................... 2-46 2.4.8 Preferred Alternative ................................................................................................ 2-48 2.5 THE FUTUREGEN PROJECT................................................................................................ 2-48 2.5.1 Power Plant and Research Facility.......................................................................... 2-48 2.5.2 Carbon Sequestration ............................................................................................... 2-58 2.5.3 Risk Assessment of Leakage of Captured Gases Before Geologic Sequestration .... 2-72 2.5.4 Risk Assessment of Leakage of Sequestered Gases from Geologic Reservoirs........ 2-72 2.5.5 Resource Requirements ............................................................................................ 2-72 2.5.6 Discharges, Waste, and Products............................................................................... 2-74 2.5.7 Construction Plans ..................................................................................................... 2-81 2.5.8 Operation Plans ......................................................................................................... 2-84 2.5.9 Post-Operation Activities .......................................................................................... 2-85 2.6 FUTURE ACTIVITIES............................................................................................................ 2-85 2.6.1 Follow-on Decisions and Planning............................................................................ 2-85 3. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES......................................................... 3-1 3.1 COMPARISON OF IMPACTS OF ALTERNATIVES .............................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Air Quality................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.3 Climate and Meteorology ........................................................................................... 3-5
32
Embed
TABLE OF CONTENTS - National Energy Technology … Library/Library/Environmental Policy... · table of contents ... appendix f aloha simulation of aqueous ammonia spills ... 4.19-7
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEMBER 2007 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................................... i LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................... LIST OF ACRONYMS - 1
VOLUME I 1. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ......................................................................1-1
1.1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 PROPOSED ACTION................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ...................................................................1-2 1.4 FUTUREGEN PROJECT ..........................................................................................................1-3
1.5 SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT..............................................1-5 1.5.1 NEPA Scoping Process ...............................................................................................1-5 1.5.2 Public Scoping Comments Received...........................................................................1-7 1.5.3 Agency Decision-Making Process...............................................................................1-8
1.6 PUBLIC HEARINGS..............................................................................................................1-10 1.7 SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES IN THE EIS...............................................................1-13
2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES...........................................................................2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION......................................................................2-1 2.3 NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE..................................................................................................2-3 2.4 SITE ALTERNATIVES..............................................................................................................2-3
2.4.1 Mattoon Site................................................................................................................2-4 2.4.2 Tuscola Site .................................................................................................................2-9 2.4.3 Jewett Site .................................................................................................................2-15 2.4.4 Odessa Site ................................................................................................................2-21 2.4.5 New Options from Site Proponents’ Best and Final Offers....................................2-28 2.4.6 Alternatives Eliminated From Further Consideration ...........................................2-40 2.4.7 Technology Options Eliminated from Further Consideration ...................................2-46 2.4.8 Preferred Alternative ................................................................................................2-48
2.5 THE FUTUREGEN PROJECT................................................................................................2-48 2.5.1 Power Plant and Research Facility..........................................................................2-48 2.5.2 Carbon Sequestration...............................................................................................2-58 2.5.3 Risk Assessment of Leakage of Captured Gases Before Geologic Sequestration ....2-72 2.5.4 Risk Assessment of Leakage of Sequestered Gases from Geologic Reservoirs........2-72 2.5.5 Resource Requirements............................................................................................2-72 2.5.6 Discharges, Waste, and Products...............................................................................2-74 2.5.7 Construction Plans.....................................................................................................2-81 2.5.8 Operation Plans .........................................................................................................2-84 2.5.9 Post-Operation Activities ..........................................................................................2-85
2.6 FUTURE ACTIVITIES............................................................................................................2-85 2.6.1 Follow-on Decisions and Planning............................................................................2-85
3. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES.........................................................3-1 3.1 COMPARISON OF IMPACTS OF ALTERNATIVES ..............................................................3-1
3.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................3-1 3.1.2 Air Quality...................................................................................................................3-1 3.1.3 Climate and Meteorology ...........................................................................................3-5
3.1.13 Transportation and Traffic.........................................................................................3-18
3.1.14 Noise and Vibration..................................................................................................3-20 3.1.15 Utility Systems ..........................................................................................................3-23
3.1.16 Materials and Waste Management ............................................................................3-24
3.1.17 Human Health, Safety, and Accidents.....................................................................3-26 3.1.18 Community Services .................................................................................................3-30
3.2 INCOMPLETE AND UNAVAILABLE INFORMATION ......................................................3-64
3.2.1 Overall Data Gaps Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Sequestration ...3-64
3.2.2 FutureGen Risk Assessment.....................................................................................3-65 3.2.3 Incomplete or Unavailable Information Relating to the FutureGen Project Design .3-68
3.2.4 Incomplete or Unavailable Information Relating to the Affected Environment .......3-70
3.3.1 Cumulative Impacts of FutureGen Technology......................................................3-72 3.3.2 Relevant Past and OnGoing Activities ......................................................................3-79
3.3.3 Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions Near Alternative Sites ............................3-87 3.3.4 Potential Cumulative Impacts for Alternative Sites ..................................................3-91
3.4 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES, AND BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ...........................................................................................3-101 3.5 COMMITMENTS, USES, AND PRODUCTIVITY ............................................................. 3-113
3.5.1 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources......................................3-113
3.5.2 Relationship between Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term
8. VOLUME I REFERENCES.........................................................................................................8-1
8.1 CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR AGENCY ACTION ..........................................8-1
8.2 CHAPTER 2 – PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES..............................................8-2
8.3 CHAPTER 3 – SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES............................8-4 9. INDEX ..........................................................................................................................................9-1
10. GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................10-1 11. DISTRIBUTION LIST ............................................................................................................... 11-1
12. LIST OF PREPARERS...............................................................................................................12-1
12.1 CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND DISCLOSURE FORMS .................................................12-13
APPENDIX A COORDINATION LETTERS ..........................................................................................A-1
APPENDIX B PUBLIC SCOPING SUMMARY .................................................................................... B-1
C.4 FEDERAL AND STATE PERMITTING .............................................................................. C-15 APPENDIX D RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY.......................................................................D-1
APPENDIX E AIR MODELING PROTOCOL ....................................................................................... E-1
4.17.2 Occupational Health and Safety .............................................................................4.17-2
4.17.3 Air Emissions.......................................................................................................4.17-16 4.17.4 Risk Assessment for CO2 Sequestration...............................................................4.17-21
4.17.5 Terrorism/Sabotage Impact.................................................................................4.17-29 4.18 COMMUNITY SERVICES ..................................................................................................4.18-1
5.10.3 Impacts ...................................................................................................................5.10-5 5.11 LAND USE ........................................................................................................................... 5.11-1
6.1.1 Power Plant Footprint...............................................................................................6.1-1
6.1.2 No-Action Alternative ..............................................................................................6.1-2
6.1.3 Jewett Site ................................................................................................................6.1-2 6.2 AIR QUALITY .......................................................................................................................6.2-1
7.1.1 Power Plant Footprint...............................................................................................7.1-1
7.1.2 No-Action Alternative ..............................................................................................7.1-2
7.1.3 Odessa Site ...............................................................................................................7.1-2 7.2 AIR QUALITY .......................................................................................................................7.2-1
7.16.3 Impacts ...................................................................................................................7.16-8 7.17 HUMAN HEALTH, SAFETY, AND ACCIDENTS .............................................................7.17-1
13. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT EIS........................................................13-1
13.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................13-1 13.2 PUBLIC HEARINGS..............................................................................................................13-1 13.3 METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................................13-4 13.4 DESCRIPTION OF COMMENTS RECEIVED ...................................................................13-6 13.5 COMMENT DOCUMENTS AND RESPONSES................................................................13-15 PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES – GENERAL ........................................13-17
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES – MATTOON .....................................13-109
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES – TUSCOLA.......................................13-169
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES – ILLINOIS........................................13-255
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES – JEWETT .........................................13-291
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES – ODESSA..........................................13-345
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES – TEXAS ............................................13-517
DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS
FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEMBER 2007 xi
LIST OF FIGURES
VOLUME I
Figure 1-1. Steps in the NEPA Process.....................................................................................................1-6
Figure 1-2. FutureGen Project Full Scope Cooperative Agreement Timeline........................................1-10
Figure 4.12-1. Proposed Mattoon Power Plant and Sequestration Site ...............................................4.12-2
Figure 4.12-2. Proposed Mattoon Process Water Pipeline Corridor Along Prairie Grass
Bike Trail ..............................................................................................................................................4.12-3
DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS
FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEMBER 2007 xiii
Figure 4.12-3. Proposed Mattoon Process Water Pipeline Corridor Along 1st Street.........................4.12-4
Figure 4.12-4. Proposed Mattoon Electrical Transmission Line Corridor...........................................4.12-4
Figure 4.12-5. Artist’s Rendering of an IGCC Plant with Minimal Screening and Architectural Design
Figure 4.12-6. Artist’s Rendering of an IGCC Plant with Extensive Screening and Architectural
Design Elements ...................................................................................................................................4.12-7
Figure 4.13-1. 50-Mile Traffic and Transportation ROI......................................................................4.13-2
Figure 4.13-2. Regional Highway and Railroad Network with Trip Distribution During
Figure 5.11-2. Land Use Classification for the Proposed Tuscola Power Plant Site, CO2 Corridor
and Proposed Sequestration Site ...........................................................................................................5.11-4
Figure 5.12-1. Proposed Tuscola Power Plant Site..............................................................................5.12-2
Figure 5.12-2. Proposed Tuscola Sequestration Site ...........................................................................5.12-3
Figure 5.12-3. Proposed Tuscola Electrical Transmission Line Corridor............................................5.12-4
Figure 5.12-4. Artist’s Rendering of an IGCC Plant with Minimal Screening and Architectural
Design Elements ...................................................................................................................................5.12-6
Figure 5.12-5. Artist’s Rendering of an IGCC Plant with Extensive Screening and Architectural
Design Elements ...................................................................................................................................5.12-7
Figure 5.13-1. 50-Mile Traffic and Transportation ROI......................................................................5.13-2
Figure 5.13-2. Regional Highway Network with Trip Distribution During Construction...................5.13-5
Figure 5.13-3. Tuscola Street Network................................................................................................5.13-8
Figure 5.14-1. SPL Values of Common Noise Sources.......................................................................5.14-3
Figure 5.14-2. Noise Measurement Locations near the Proposed Tuscola Power Plant Site ..............5.14-6
Figure 5.14-3. Change in Noise Level During Construction at the Proposed Tuscola Power
Plant Site .............................................................................................................................................5.14-13
Figure 5.14-4. Change in Noise Level During Operation at the Proposed Tuscola Power
Plant Site .............................................................................................................................................5.14-18
Figure 6.12-3. Artist’s Rendering of an IGCC Plant with Minimal Screening and Architectural
Design Elements ...................................................................................................................................6.12-7
Figure 6.12-4. Artist’s Rendering of an IGCC Plant with Extensive Screening and Architectural
Design Elements ...................................................................................................................................6.12-7
Figure 6.13-1. 50-Mile Traffic and Transportation ROI......................................................................6.13-2
Figure 6.13-2. Regional Highway Network with Trip Distribution During Construction...................6.13-5
Figure 6.14-1. SPL Values of Common Noise Sources.......................................................................6.14-3
Figure 6.14-2. Noise Measurement Locations near the Proposed Jewett Power Plant Site.................6.14-5
Figure 6.15-1. Existing and Proposed Utility Corridors .....................................................................6.15-4
Figure 7.12-4. Artist’s Rendering of an IGCC Plant with Minimal Screening and Architectural
Design Elements ...................................................................................................................................7.12-7
Figure 7.12-5. Artist’s Rendering of an IGCC Plant with Extensive Screening and Architectural
Design Elements ...................................................................................................................................7.12-7
Figure 7.13-1. 50-Mile Traffic and Transportation ROI......................................................................7.13-2
Figure 7.13-2. Highway and Railroad Network...................................................................................7.13-5
Figure 7.14-1. SPL Values of Common Noise Sources.......................................................................7.14-3
Figure 7.14-2. Sensitive Receptor Locations near the Proposed Odessa Power Plant Site .................7.14-5
Figure 7.15-1. Existing and Proposed Utility Corridors ......................................................................7.15-5
Table 4.2-6. Annual Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions ....................................................................4.2-12
Table 4.2-7. Screening Analysis for Effects on Vegetation and Soils .................................................4.2-17
Table 4.3-1. Seasonal Weather Data ....................................................................................................4.3-2
Table 4.5-1. Predominant Soil Types, Characteristics, and Uses in the Proposed Power Plant and
Sequestration Sites and Related Corridors..............................................................................................4.5-2
Table 4.7-1. Water Resources within ROI Listed on State of Illinois 2006 303(d) List........................4.7-5
Table 4.7-2. Water Quality Data Summary ...........................................................................................4.7-6
Table 4.7-3. Effluent Flow Data from the Mattoon and Charleston WWTPs .......................................4.7-7
Table 4.8-1. Summary of Delineated Wetlands within the Proposed Mattoon Power Plant
Project ROI .............................................................................................................................................4.8-2
Table 4.10-1. Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites within ROI.................................................4.10-4
Table 4.13-1. Level of Service Criteria, Two-Lane Highways............................................................4.13-3
Table 4.13-2. Level of Service Criteria, Multi-Lane Highways ..........................................................4.13-3
Table 4.13-3. Level of Service Criteria, Basic Freeway Segments......................................................4.13-4
Table 4.13-4. Roadway Class Characteristics......................................................................................4.13-6
DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS
FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEMBER 2007 xxii
Table 4.13-5. 2005 Average Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.................................................4.13-10
Table 4.13-6. 2009 Average Daily and Peak Hour No-Build Traffic Volumes.................................4.13-11
Table 4.13-7. 2009 Average Daily and Peak Hour Construction Traffic Volumes ...........................4.13-12
Table 4.13-8. 2012 Average Daily and Peak Hour No-Build Traffic Volumes.................................4.13-16
Table 4.13-9. 2012 Average Daily and Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes.......................................4.13-17
Table 4.14-1. Noise Measurement Locations Near Proposed Mattoon Power Plant Site....................4.14-5
Table 4.14-2. Measured Ambient Noise Levels and Maximum and Minimum Sound Pressure
Table 4.17-11. Summary Analysis Results – Hazardous Air Pollutants............................................4.17-18
Table 4.17-12. Exceedance of Occupational Health Criteria1 for Workers ......................................4.17-24
Table 4.17-13. Description of Hazard Endpoints for Public Receptors.............................................4.17-25
Table 4.17-14. Hazard Endpoints for Public Receptors.....................................................................4.17-26
Table 4.17-15. Effects to the Public from Pre-Sequestration Releases..............................................4.17-28
Table 4.17-16. Number of Individuals with Adverse Effects from Potential Exposure to Post-
Sequestration H2S Gas Releases .........................................................................................................4.17-29
Table 4.17-17. Effects to the Public from Explosions at the FutureGen Plant ..................................4.17-31
Table 4.18-1. Staffing Levels of Police Departments in Coles County ...............................................4.18-3
Table 4.18-2. School Statistics for Coles County, Illinois and the U.S. in 2005 .................................4.18-4
Table 4.19-1. Population Distribution and Projected Change for Counties Containing Land Area
within the ROI.......................................................................................................................................4.19-2
DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS
FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEMBER 2007 xxiv
Table 4.19-2. Employment and Income for Counties within the ROI .................................................4.19-3
Table 4.19-3. Minimum and Maximum Hourly Wages by Trade in Coles County, Illinois in
November 2005.....................................................................................................................................4.19-5
Table 4.19-4. Total Housing Units within the ROI in 2006.................................................................4.19-6
Table 4.20-1. County, Regional, and National Population and Low-Income Distributions (2000) ....4.20-2
Table 5.1-1. Tuscola Site Features.........................................................................................................5.1-3
Table 5.2-1. Yearly Estimates of Maximum Air Emissions from the FutureGen Project .....................5.2-2
Table 5.2-2. Monitoring Stations and Ambient Air Quality Data..........................................................5.2-4
Table 5.17-11. Summary Analysis Results — Hazardous Air Pollutants..........................................5.17-18
Table 5.17-12. Exceedance of Occupational Health Criteria1 for Workers ......................................5.17-24
Table 5.17-13. Description of Hazard Endpoints for Public Receptors.............................................5.17-25
Table 5.17-14. Hazard Endpoints for Public Receptors.....................................................................5.17-26
Table 5.17-15. Effects to the Public from Pre-Sequestration Releases..............................................5.17-28
Table 5.17-16. Number of Individuals with Adverse Effects from Potential Exposure to Post-
Sequestration H2S Gas Releases .........................................................................................................5.17-29
Table 5.17-17. Effects to the Public from Explosions at the FutureGen Plant ..................................5.17-31
Table 5.18-1. Staffing Levels of Police Departments in Douglas County...........................................5.18-3
DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS
FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEMBER 2007 xxvii
Table 5.18-2. School Statistics for Douglas County, Illinois and the U.S. in 2005.............................5.18-5
Table 5.19-1. Population Distribution and Projected Change for Counties Containing Land Area
within the ROI.......................................................................................................................................5.19-2
Table 5.19-2. Employment and Income for Counties within the ROI .................................................5.19-3
Table 5.19-3. Minimum and Maximum Hourly Wages by Trade in Douglas County, Illinois, in
November 2005.....................................................................................................................................5.19-4
Table 5.19-4. Total Housing Units within the ROI in 2006.................................................................5.19-5
Table 5.20-1. County, Regional and National Population and Low-Income Distributions (2000) .....5.20-2
Table 6.1-1. Jewett Site Features ...........................................................................................................6.1-3
Table 6.2-1. Yearly Estimates of Maximum Air Emissions from the FutureGen Project .....................6.2-2
Table 6.2-2. Monitoring Stations and Ambient Air Quality Data .......................................................6.2-4
Table 6.3-2. Regional Tornado Activity, 1950 to 2006 .........................................................................6.3-4
Table 6.5-1. Predominant Soil Types, Characteristics, and Uses in the Proposed Power Plant and
Sequestration Sites and Related Corridors..............................................................................................6.5-2
Table 6.6-1. Typical Range of Physical Properties of Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer Units that May
Provide Water for the Proposed FutureGen Project................................................................................6.6-3
Table 6.6-2. Estimated Recharge Rates for Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer Units...........................................6.6-3
Table 6.6-3. Representative Water Quality Analysis from the Simsboro Aquifer Adjacent to the
Proposed Power Plant Site ......................................................................................................................6.6-3
Table 6.6-4. Groundwater Use in the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer System.................................................6.6-4
DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS
FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEMBER 2007 xxviii
Table 6.6-5. Projected Water Demand1 for 2010-2060.........................................................................6.6-7
Table 6.7-1. Annual Average Water Quality Data for the Trinity River Station...................................6.7-5
Table 6.9-1. Aquatic Invertebrates Collected from Creeks within the ROI...........................................6.9-6
Table 6.9-2. Fish Species Whose Geographic Distribution Includes the Proposed Power Plant Site ...6.9-9
Table 6.9-3. Invertebrates Designated as “Rare” by TPWD in Freestone, Leon, Limestone, and
Anderson Counties................................................................................................................................6.9-16
Table 6.10-1. Summary of Previous Archaeological Investigations in CO2 Pipeline Segments and
Table 6.17-11. Summary Analysis Results — Hazardous Air Pollutants..........................................6.17-18
Table 6.17-12. Exceedance of Occupational Health Criteria1 for Workers ......................................6.17-24
Table 6.17-13. Description of Hazard Endpoints for Public Receptors.............................................6.17-26
Table 6.17-14. Hazard Endpoints for Public Receptors.....................................................................6.17-26
Table 6.17-15. Effects to the Public from Pre-Sequestration Releases..............................................6.17-29
Table 6.17-16. Number of Individuals with Adverse Effects from Potential Exposure to Post-
Sequestration H2S Gas Releases .........................................................................................................6.17-30
Table 6.17-17. Effects to the Public from Explosions at the FutureGen Plant ..................................6.17-32
Table 6.18-1. Staffing Levels of Police Departments in Freestone, Leon, and Limestone Counties ..6.18-3
Table 6.18-2. School Statistics for Texas and the U.S. in 2005...........................................................6.18-4
Table 6.19-1. Population Distribution and Projected Change for Counties Containing Land Area
within the ROI.......................................................................................................................................6.19-2
Table 6.19-2. Employment and Income for Counties within the ROI .................................................6.19-3
DOE/EIS-0394 FUTUREGEN PROJECT EIS
FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVEMBER 2007 xxx
Table 6.19-3. Average Hourly Wage Rates in 2003 by Trade in Freestone, Leon, and Limestone
Counties in Texas..................................................................................................................................6.19-4
Table 6.19-4. Total Housing Units within the ROI for the Year 2000 .................................................6.19-4
Table 6.20-1. County, Regional and National Population and Low-income Distributions (2000)......6.20-2
Table 7.1-1. Odessa Site Features ........................................................................................................7.1-3
Table 7.2-1. Yearly Estimates of Maximum Air Emissions from the FutureGen Project .....................7.2-2
Table 7.2-2. Monitoring Stations and Ambient Air Quality Data .......................................................7.2-4
Table 7.17-11. Summary Analysis Results — Hazardous Air Pollutants..........................................7.17-18
Table 7.17-12. Exceedance of Occupational Health Criteria for Workers ........................................7.17-24
Table 7.17-13. Description of Hazard Endpoints for Public Receptors.............................................7.17-25
Table 7.17-14. Hazard Endpoints for Public Receptors.....................................................................7.17-26
Table 7.17-15. Effects to the Public from Pre-Sequestration Releases..............................................7.17-28
Table 7.17-16. Number of Individuals with Adverse Effects from Potential Exposure to Post-
Sequestration H2S Gas Releases .........................................................................................................7.17-29
Table 7.17-17. Effects to the Public from Explosions at the FutureGen Plant ..................................7.17-31
Table 7.18-1. School Statistics for Texas and the U.S. in 2005...........................................................7.18-4
Table 7.19-1. Population Distribution and Projected Change for Counties Containing Land Area
within the ROI.......................................................................................................................................7.19-2
Table 7.19-2. Employment and Income for Counties within the ROI .................................................7.19-3
Table 7.19-3. Average Hourly Wage Rates in 2003 by Trade in Ector County, Texas.......................7.19-3
Table 7.19-4. Total Housing Units within the ROI in 2000.................................................................7.19-4
Table 7.20-1. County, Regional and National Population and Low-income Distributions (2000)......7.20-2
VOLUME III
Table 13-1. Public Hearing Locations and Dates .................................................................................13-1
Table 13-2. Public Hearing Newspaper Advertisements .......................................................................13-2
Table 13-3. Number of People in Attendance at Public Hearings........................................................13-3
Table 13-4. Number of People that Provided Oral Comments at the Public Hearings .......................13-3
Table 13-5. General Comments from Public Hearings.........................................................................13-4
Table 13-6. General Terms on the Comment-Response Process ..........................................................13-5
Table 13-7. Commentors, Comment Numbers, and Resource Areas ...................................................13-6