Systems Engineering, Development and Management Contractor ... · Consad Research, Corp. 121 N. Highland Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15206 CSIS 1800 K Street Washington, D.C. 20006 Brookhaven

I! il�,I ll e e pc, .Qk -I

-5- fri

Department of-EnergyWashington,DC 20585

JUN 18 1987

INFORMATION LETTER

7SUBJECT: Systems Engineering, Development and Management Contractor forthe Nuclear Waste Management System, Office of CivilianRadioactive Waste Management, DOE Request for Proposals (RFP)No. DE-RPOl-87RWO0134

TO: Potential Offerors/Respondents

The primary purpose of this letter is to distribute all materials whichwere made available at the DOE Presolicitation Conference conducted onJune 16, 1987, for the subject requirement.

This letter also serves as public notice to those firms on the Bidders'List who may not have been represented at the Conference, of the openingof the Public Reading Rooms for this requirement. Reference is made tothe enclosure entitled Reading Room Inventory Listing, OCRWM NuclearWaste Management System," which contains specific information regardingaccess to, and purchase of, the Reading Room materials.

Enclosed for your information is the following:-

.I

X7

o Presolicitation Conference Agendao Presolicitation Conference Attendee Listo Presolicitation Conference Presentation Slides (Hard Copy)o RFP Source/Bidders List as of June 10, 1987o Reading Room Inventory Listing-OCRWM Nuclear Waste Management Systemo Organizational Conflicts of Interest Guidelineso Draft Statement of Work (with original transmittal letter of June 3, 1987)

Should you have any questions related to the enclosed, please contact theundersigned on (202) 586-1360. In the meantime, all offerors are advised that aforthcoming Commerce Business Daily notice will announce the actual solicitationrelease date, currently planned for August, 1987. If your firm s already onthe Bidder's List, there is no need to request a copy of the solicitation; onewill be furnished to you.

,d We WM Project |Sneerelv.WM Recoi*1 -- A - Docdiet ___ ___Z

LPDR R

Procurement emberSource Evaluation Board

O i'.3 n C.

(Y.:n to V'A,G23-SS)_ _ .. ._ _ ._ __ .. ._ ._ ._._ __ __ _n

L, .872095 94WM Project: M-I

?__- I POR N/enclIReturn to NM, 623-5s)

]Y_

1111 RecorY ie: 109LPDR m/end

Cekbrating the .S. Constitution Bicentennial - 1787-1987

8709080035 870618PDR WASTE

IWM-1 PDR

'b ual *{rr) +n14CPRESOLrc14TATION CONFERENCE ATTENDEE LIST

!-

JUNE 16, 1987

Acres International, Corp.P.O. Box 1001Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E6WI

Acres International, Corp.424 Main StreetLiberty BuildingSuite 1000Buffalo, ew York 14202-3592

Advanced Sciences, Inc.2000 N. 15th StreetSuite 407Arlington, VA 22201

American Operations, Corp.1500 Wilson BoulevardArlington, VA 22209

Battelle Memorial Institute505 King AvenueColumbus, Ohio 43201

Battelle Memorial Institute1375 PerryColumbus, Ohio 43201

Battelle Memorial7000 South AdamsWillowbrook, Illinois 60521

Battelle - PNL2030 N Street, N.W. 8th FloorWashington, D.C. 20036

Robert H. Bauer(self-employed)

American Society of Mechnical1825 K Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20006

Engineers The BDM Corporation7915 Jones Branch Dr.McLean, VA 22102

Analytical Resources, Inc.P.O. Box 3728Gaithersburg, MD 20878

Bechtel50 Beale StreetSan Francisco, CA 94119

ATC1709 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20006

Bechtel1620 Eye Street,Washington, D.C.

NW. t70320006

Atomic Energy of Canada, LTDWhiteshell ResearchPinawa, ManitobaCanada Rue ILO

Automated Sciences Group* 750 Roeder RoadSilver Spring, MD 20910

Bechtel National,P.O. Box 3965San Francisco, CA

Inc.

94119

E.J. Bentz & Assoc, Inc.7915 Richfield, RoadSpringfield, VA 22153

Babcock & WilcoxP.O. Box 10935Lynchburg, VA 24506-0935

Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc.7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1100Bethesda, Maryland 20814

British Nuclear Fuel, LTDRisley Warrington EnglandU.S. Office (rep) Nucom Inc.Crissey Rd.Great Barrington, MA 02130

British Nuclear Fuels, LTDEngland

c/o Laurie Dixon3211 Jermantown, Rd.Fairfax, VA 22311

Columbia General, Inc.P.O. Box 16075Columbus, Ohio 43216

Combustion Engineering1000 Prospect Hill RoadWindsor, CT 06095

Consad Research, Corp.121 N. Highland AvenuePittsburgh, PA 15206

CSIS1800 K StreetWashington, D.C. 20006

Brookhaven National LaboratoryUpton, New York 11973

Brown & Root Development, Inc.1730 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W.Suite 213Washington, D.C. 20036

Dames & Moore221 Main StreetSan Francisco, CA

Dames & Moore455 E. Paces Ferr,Atlanta, Ga. 3031

94105

y Rd, Suite 200563

Brown & Root, Inc.P.O. Box 3Houston, Texas 77001

Data Resources1750 K Street, N.W., 9th FloorWashington, D.C. 20006

J.P. Cappello7100 River's Edge RoadColumbia, Maryland 21044

C-EP.O. Box 500Windsor, CT 06095-0500

CER CorporationP.O. Box 15090Las Vegas, N 89114

CH2M HillP.O. Box 4400Reston, VA 22090

College of EngineersCPE 3.182

.University of TexasAustin, Texas 78772

Decision SystemsTechnologies, Inc.6305 Ivy Lane - Suite 414Greenbelt, MD 20770

Duke Engineering & Services, Inc.526 South Church StreetP.O. Box 36911Charlotte, NC 28236

The Earth Technology Corp.3777 Long Beach Blvd.Long Beach, CA 91001

Earth Technology Corporation300 N. Washington StreetSuite 404Washington, D.C. 22314

EBASCO Services, Inc.Two World Trade Center93rd FloorNew York, N.Y. 10048

EC Corporation575 Oak Ridge TurnpikeOak Ridge, TN 37830

Edison Electric Institute[if 19th Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20036

EER Technologies Corp1801 Alexander Bell Drive, #400Reston, VA 22091

Environmental Science & Engineering, Inc.2136 N. Quebec StreetArlington, VA 22207

ERC International3211 Jermantown RoadFairfax, VA 22030

E.R. Johnson Associates, Inc.11702 Bowman Green DriveReston, VA 22090

ESE, Inc.P.O. Box ESEGainesville, FL 32602

Fluor Daniel1627 K Street, N.W.Suite 200Washington, D.C. 20006

Fluor Technology, Inc.Advanced Technology Division3333 Michelson DriveIrving, California 92730

Gilbert/Commonwealth, Inc.P.O. Box 1498Reading, PA 19603

Golder Associates, Inc.4104 - 148th Avenue, N.E.Redmond, WA 98072

Grumman Corp.1111 Stewart Avenue9-20-SSpace System DivisionBethpage, New York 11714

Grumman Space Systems Div.625-29S. Oyster Bay Rd.Bethpage, NY 11743

Harbridge House, Inc.1725 Jefferson Davis HighwaySuite 600Arlington, VA 22202

Harding Lawson, Assoc.3175 No. 21st StreetArlington, VA 22201

Narza Engineering, Co.1060 Leighmill RoadGreat Falls, VA 22066

Holmes & Narver, Inc.999 Town & Country DriveOrange, CA 92668

Holmes & Narver, Inc.6501 Americas ParkwayAlbuquerque, N.M.

ICF Incorporated1850 K Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20006

Integrated Systems Technology19636 Club ouse Road, Suite 110Gaithersburg, MD 20879

Robert B. RyanIndependent TransportationConsultant1325 4th Street, S.W.Washington, D.C. 20024

* Integrated Systems TechnologyDivision of SWUCO, Inc.19636 Club House Road, Suite 110Gaithersburg, D 20879

International Technology, Corp.600 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Suite 755EWashington, D.C. 20006

Arthur D. Little600 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Washington, D.C. 20024

Los Alamos Technical AssociatesSuite 9006501 Americas Parkway, N.E.Albuquerque, NM 87110

Jacobs Engineering Group1234 National Press Building529 14th Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20045

Jacobs Engineering251 So. Lake AvenuePasadena, California 91101

JAYCOR1901 . Beauregard StreetAlexandria, VA 22311

MAC Technical Services1933-1955 Jadwin Avenue,Richland, WA 99352

Suite 225

MAC Technical Services Co.P.O. Box 85404San Diego, CA 92138

MAC Technical Services1050 Connecticut Avenue #300Washington, D.C. 20036

Management Analysis Co.12671 High Bluff DriveSan Diego, CA 92130

JK Associates4801 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 402Washington, D.C. 20016

Kaiser Engineers, Inc.1117 North 19th StreetSuite 800Arlington, VA 22209

Kaiser Engineers, Inc.1800 HarrisonOakland, CA 94623

KCI1025 Connecticut Avenue #703Washington, D.C. 20036

Labat-Anderson, Inc.liII 19th Street, N.Rosslyn, VA 22203

Law Environmental1140 Hammond DriveAtlanta, GA 30328

Martin Marietta CorpP.O. Box 'Y'Oakridge, TN 37830

Martin Marietta Denver AerospaceP.O. Box 179 MS 0490Denver, Colorado 80201

The Maxima Corp107 Union Valley RoadOak Ridge, TN 37830

Meridian Corporation4300 King Street, Suite 400Alexandria, VA 22302

MJI Associates, Inc.P.O. Box 40Centerport, N.Y. 11721

Morrison Knudsen Corp.1725 "K" Street N.W., Suite 1102Washington, D.C. 20006

Morrison Knudsen Engineers, Inc.180 Howard StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105

Morrison Knudsen Engineers720 Park Blvd.Boise, ID 83707

Nuclear Assurance Corp.5720 Peachtree ParkwayNorcross, GA 30092

Nuclear Data Sciences, Inc.1850 Centennial Park Drive, Suite 300Reston, VA 22091

NUMATECSuite 40025501 Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20037

NUS Corporation910 Clopper RoadGaithersburg, MD 20878

NUTECH145 artinvale LaneSan Jose, CA 95119

ONEIRUS AEROSPACE151 Center StreetCape Canaveral, FL 32920

The Ralph M. Parsons, Co.1133 15th Street, N.W., Suite 800Washington, D.C. 20005

Parsons Brinckerhoff uade andand Douglas, Inc.

1625 Van Ness Avenue, 4th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94109

Parsons, Brinckerhoff Quade &Douglas, Inc.

One Penn PlazaNew York, NY 10119

Peak Technical, Inc.400 W. Maple RoadSuite 300Birmingham, Ml 48011

Precision Components Corp.P.O. Box M-l0York, PA 17405

Precision Management Analysis,14412 Brookmead DriveGermantown, MD 20874

Precision Management Analysis,7100 Rivers Edge RoadColumbia, MD 21044

Pickard, Lowe & Garrick1615 Street, N.W.Suite 730Washington, D.C. 20036

Planning Research Corp.1500 Planning Research DriveMcLean, VA 22102

W.J. Purcell(self-employed)

The Quest Group8400 West Park DriveSuite 600McLean, VA 22101

Reedy Associates103 Albright WayLos Gatos, CA

ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALSCIENCE CENTER1049 Camino Dos RiosThousand Oaks, CA 91360

Rockwell HanfordP.O. Box 800Richland, WA 99352

Inc.

Inc.

Rogers & Associates Engineering, Corp.515 East 4500 South, Suite G-l00Box 330Salt Lake City, Utah 84110

Science Applications Int'l, Corp.300 S. Tulane AvenueOak Ridge, TN 37830

SKBc/o Harold Ahagen509 Aurora Avenue, Apt. 411Naperville, IL 60540

SMS800 Commerce Road, WestSuite 500New Orleans, LA 70123

Stone Webster Engineering Corp.245 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02107

SAIC101 Convention Center, Dr.Las Vegas, NV 89109

Science Applications Intl, Corp.160 Spear Street #1250San Francisco, CA 94105

SAIC1710 Goodridge DriveMcLean, VA 22102

Science and Technology InstituteP.O. Box 729Fairfax, VA 22030

Schneider, Inc.#1 Farragut Square, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20006

S - CUBED3398 Carnel Mountain RoadSan Diego, CA 92038

S - CUBED530 11th AvenueSalt Lake City, Utah 84103

SEA, INC.7777 Leesburg PikeFalls Church, VA 22043

SKBBox 5864S-10248 Stockholm, Sweden

Stone & Webster Engineering,1875 Eye Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20006

Corp.

TASC55 Walkers Brook DriveReading, MA 08167

Techmatics, Inc.2611 Jefferson Davis HighwayArlington, VA 22202

Tourtellotte, Ross & Gray1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 450Washington, D.C. 20006

Townsend and Bottum Professional Serv.2245 South State StreetP.O. Box 1368Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1368

Transnuclear, Inc.507 New Mark EsplanadeRockville, MD 20850

Transnuclear, Inc.One North BoardwayWhite Plains, NY 10601

Ernest B. TrenmelEnergy Consultant5908 Rossmore DriveBethesda, MD 20814

TRWI Federal Systems Park DriveFairfax, VA 22033

TRW Federal Systems Group2751 Prosperity AvenueFairfax, VA 22031

United Engineers & ConstructorsP.O. Box 822330 South 17th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19101

Westinghouse800 Oak Ridge TurnpikeOak Ridge, TN 37830

Westinghouse1801 K Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20006

Westinghouse Electric Corp.Nuclear Waste Dept.P.O. Box 3912Pittsburgh, PA 15230

United Minerals8217 Plum CreekGaithersburg, E

& Energy, Inc.Drive1 20879

Westinghouse Electric Corp.1801 K Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20006

UNC DefenseOne American WayNorwich, CT 06360

Williams Brothers6600 So YaleTulsa, OK 74136

UNC Naval Products67 Sandy Desert RoadUncasville, CT 06382

URS Corporation3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 300Seattle, WA 98121

URS Corporation450 4th AvenueSuite 500San Francisco, CA 94103

Woodward-Clyde Consultants1390 Market Street #250San Francisco, CA 94102

Roy F. Weston, Inc.955 LEnfant Plaza, S.W.Washington, D.C. 20024

Wilson Zublin, Inc.P.O. Box 9217Bakersfield, CA 93389

The Washington Consulting Group1625 Eye Street, N.W. #214Washington, D.C. 20006

Waste Chem Corp.One Kalish WayParamus, NJ 07652

Weste Services Inc.2260 Butler PikePlymouth Meeting, PA

PRESOLICITATION CONFERENCE AGENDA

8:00 am

9.00 am.

9:10 am.

9:30a.m.

10-30 am.

10;45 a.m.

11:30 a.m.

11:45 p.m.

REGISTRATION

OPENING REMARKS

WELCOME

PROGRAM BACKGROUNDo System Integration,

Storage, andTransportation

o Geologic RepositoryProgram

BREAK

SCOPE OF WORK

SOLICITATION PROCESSo Reading Roomso RFP Schedule

BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONSo Competitiono Organizational Conflicts

of Interesto Contraet Type

ADJOURN

SAMUEL ROUSSO

BEN RUSCHE

ROGER HILLEY

STEVE KALE

MARK FREI

SAMUEL ROUSSO

ALETA EGELAND

12:30 p.m.

A

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY & EXPERIENCE SOLIRCE SYSTEMR0423620 PROCUREMENT OPERATIONSDATE: JUN 10,87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST BY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE 1

… ===================== = = = = =

RFP: RPO1-87RW00134 B/NC:SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT* PROGRAM

OPENS CLOSE:…====-=======_================ =

28269:ACRES INTERNATIONAL424 MAIN STREETLIBERTY BLDG/ SUITE 1000BUFFALO NY 142023592ATTN: STEWART N. THOMPSON

31014AECL-USA2310 PARKDALE DRIVESUITE 300ATLANTA GA 30345ATTN: RALPH RITTELLI. JR.

31529ALPENSHIFT ENGINEERING SYSTEMS1155 EAST 500 SOUTHSUITE 13SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102ATTN: MICHAEL SKERL

========== =========S========= == =

78051AMERICAN OPERATIONS CORP.1500 WILSON BLVD.P.O. BOX 12703ARLINGTON VA 22209 1ATTNI L. FRANK FIELD

13333ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INCP.O. BOX 3728* ,

GAITHERSBURG MD 208783728 1ATTN, MICHAEL CROOK

31950ADVANCED RESEARCH CORPORATION410 PINE STREET, S.E.-SUITE 304VIENNA VA 22180ATTN: ROBERT E. TODD

== = = ==…= == = = ===- …== = == =

78262ALAN KUHN13212 MANITOBA DRIVE, N.E.*.

ALBUQUERQUE NM 871112955ATTNz ALAN K. KUHN

70128AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.1777 NORTH KENT STREETROOM 1158AARLINGTON VA 22209ATTNs NANCY 0. SMART

31951ANACAPA SCIENCES, INC.P.O. BOX DRAWER Q

SANTA BARBARA CA 93102ATTNs VIOLA FREEMAN

31569ARONSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.5041 WEST FAIR AVENUE

LITTLETON CO 80123ATTNs H. HAROLD ARONSON, P.E.

=====.=.====…======= ==…==

31949AT & E CONSULTANTS, INC.105 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY

NORCROSS GA 30092ATTN: GREGORY R. FISCHER

-= = = s z a = s=…= = = = = = = =

10866ARTHUR D. LITTLE INC.25 CORN PARK

IIIIIIII

CAMBRrUGE MA 021402390 1ATTN: JUNE COFFEY :

=== == e~== == =s == -= =s=…= ==

31528AUTOMATED SCIENCES GROUP, INC.5677 OLERLIN DRIVE# 204SAN DIEGO CA 92121ATTN: J.C. REISER

: 12916. BABCOCK AND WILCOX' P.O. BOX 10935

: LYNCHBURG VA: ATTNI ROGER H. STOUDT

_ _ _ _ _ _ ===O

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITYR0423620 PROCUREMENTDATE: JUN lOB7 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST

RFP: RPO1-87RW00134SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT*

OPEN:

93005 1BATTELLE COLUMBUS LABORATORIES ,505 KING AVENUEROOM 11-7-130COLUMBUS OH 432012693 1ATTN: C.P. NUNN

92002BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC.P.O. BOX 3965

SAN FRANCISCO CA 94119ATTN: PAMELA M. BAILEY

92006BLACK AND VEATCH IP. O. _BOX 8405*

KANSAS CITY MO 64114 :ATTN: HARRY L. CALLAHAN -

= …====== ======= ======c===

& EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMOPERATIONSBY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE 2

B/NC:PROGRAM

CLOSE:

30368BCP TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.3000 GEN. DEGAULLE DRIVESUITE 210NEW ORLEANS LA 70114ATTNi CHRISTIAN L. STAUBUS

…==============…==== =

31502BERUL ASSOCIATESv LTD.1530 EAST JEFFERSON STREET

ROCKVILLE MDATTN: SARAH E. WIMBISH

20852

13303BOOZ ALLEN AND HAMILTON INC. -4330 EAST WEST HIGHWAY

BETHESDA MD 208144455ATTNz MAJORIE E. ADAMS

94030 tBURNS AND ROE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES COMPA*1800 KINDERKAMACK ROAD :* I

31527BURNS.AND ROE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES COMPs700 KINDERMACK ROAD

ORADELL NJATTN: THOMAS W. DIFRANSICO

07649 : ORADELL NJ: ATTNI ARMAND J. LUCANIA

07649

======�================================== ===================---==…=-=…

12437CER CORPP.O. BOX 150902225 EAST FLAMINGO ROAD/#300LAS VEGAS NVATTN: C. EDWARD O/NEAL

: 31526: CHARLES H. WAHTOLA JR., PH.D.: 12600 W. COLFAXI SUITE 280I LAKEWOOD CO 80215I ATTNs CHARLES H. WAHTOLA, JR.

891145090

…= ------ =

30565CHEN AND ASSOCIATES96 SOUTH ZUNI

DENVER COATTN: SUSAN M. LEMASTER

80223

====== ===== ======================

31018COLUMBIA GENERAL, INC.P.O. BOX 16075

* 14827I CH2M HILLP.O. BOX 4400

: RESTON VA 22090ATTNI ROBERT G. GARD

788011 COMBUSTION ENGINEERING1 INC. (9403-9BB): 1000 PROSPECT HILL ROAD1 P.O. BOX 500

WINDSOR CT 06095050C: ATTN: WILLIAM J. BURNS

COLUMBUSATTN: M.H. FARZIN

OH 43216

A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY & EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMR0423620 PROCUREMENT OPERATIONSDATES JUN 10,87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST BY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE

=5Z===S===== = ======= =======

RFPI RPO1-87RW00134SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT*

OPENs

B/NC:0REPOSITORY PROGRAM

* ~~~CLOSE:

22210COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION6565 ARLINGTON BLVD

77078COMPUTER DATA SYSTEMS INCONE CURIE COURTSTE 20OWROCKVILLE MD 20850ATTN: JAN TRIGGS

31525CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATESHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES115 N. 5TH STREET/ SUITE 520GRAND JUNCTION CO 81301ATTN! DEE JACOBSON

=====as=========_================

31524CONTINENTAL SHELF ASSOCIATES, INC.759 PARKWAY STREET

JUPITER FL 33477ATTN: CAROL ANDERSON

13316D.K. PAUL & ASSOCIATESP.O. BOX 1856*

SPRING TX 773831856ATTN:

70607DAMES AND MOORE455 EAST PACES FERRY ROADSUITE 200ATLANTA A- A', 30363ATTN: TERRY WALLAkc-

29349DECISION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES INC.6305 IVY LANESTE 414GREENBELT MD 20770ATTNt RONALD . DUYCH

FALLS CHURCH VAATTN: EARL S. HOLLAND

22046

12100CONSAD RESEARCH CORPORATION121 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE

PITTSBURGH PA 15206ATTN: WILBUR A. STEGAR

31523CYONAi ENERGY SERVICES 2121 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD.SUITE 390 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596ATTNS WM. MARK G.RAYSON

31006DAMES-AND MOORE500 SANSOME STREET

SAN FRANCISCO CA 94 11 1ATTN: STEPHEN C. BROWN

1 104461 DATA RESOURCES INC.1 1750 K STREET, N.W.,I STE 900/ TH FLOOR: WASHINGTON DC 20006: ATTNS S. SIMPSON

: 12106: E. R. JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC.: 11702 BOWMAN GREEN DRIVE

iRESTON VA 22090ATTNZ J. JOHNSON

: 11407 I EARTH SATELLITE CORPORATION: 7222 47TH STREET N.W.

77002EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE & TECH15 LOVETON CIRCLEHUNT VALLEY/LOVETON CENTERSPARKS MD 21152ATTN: JACQUELINE HUNTER

II

IIWASHINGTON DCATTN: RICHARD MIC:HAEL

208<:1 5

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY & EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMR0423620 PROCUREMENT OPERATIONSDATE: JUN 10v87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST BY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE

…=_ = == = = = …= = == === == == = = = =… = = = =

RFP: RPO1-87RW00134 B/NC:SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT* REPOSITORY PROGRAM

OPEN.' CLOSEs==s=====c=e==============

31522EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES, INC.234 EAST BABCOCKP.O. BOX 1985BOZEMAN MT 597711985ATTN: DARREL E. DUNN

29076EBASCO SERVICES INC.160 CHUBB AVENUE

LYNDHURST NJ 07071ATTN: GLORIA DECKER

70048EC CORPORATION575 OAK RIDGE TURNPIKESTE 200OAK RIDGE TN 37830ATTNs ORLINO C. BALDONADO

==== = = ==== c== == = === ==== === ==

31520ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP3211 JERMANTOWN RD./SUITE 422P.O. BOX 10107FAIRFAX VA 22030ATTN: WAYNE H. TRAFFAS

====z= === = s = = = s = = a= = = =

31521ENGINEERING-SCIENCE, INC.P.O. BOX 7107

PASADENA CA 91109ATTN: DR. BRUNO LORAN

92038ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGIN.P 0 BOX ESE'

GAINESVILLE FL 32602ATTN: ROCHELLE CALINSON

=- = = = = = = s = …s = = z = = = = =

94013EBASCO SERVICE INCORPORATEDTWO WORLD TRADE CTR.93FL.NEW YORK NY 100480752ATTN: RICHARD S. CRESSE

70048EC CORPORATION575 OAK RIDGE TURNPIKESTE 200OAK RIDGE TN 37830ATTNI BOB GRANT

11464ENERGETICS INCORPORATED9210 ROUTE 108

COLUMBIA MD 21045ATTN: BARBARA WHITWORTH

70097ENGINEERING SCIENCE INC.57 EXECUTIVE PARK SOUTHSUITE 590ATLANTA GA 30329ATTNs GERI HOPP

12068ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL INC.98 E. NAPERVILLE ROAD

WESTMONT IL 605591595ATTN: MADAN M. SINGH

=s=s==_=== = ===

31519ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING,7332 SOUTH ALTON WAYSUITE HENGLEWOOD CO 80112ATTN: CAROLYN CALLOR= ==s-=============== ===

30785ERCI SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT*:3211 JRMANTOWN ROAD :4TH FLOOR :FAIRFAX VA 22030 I

ATTNs WAYNE H. TRAFFAS :

95484ERM-MIDWLST, INC2000 W. HENDERSON ROAD

COLUMbUS OHATTNs NEIL L. DROBNY, PH.D.

43220

A - -

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY & EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMR0423620 PROCUREMENT OPERATIONSDATE: JUN 10,87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST BY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE

= 2

RFP: RPO 1 -87RW00 134 B/NC:SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT* REPOSITORY PROGRAM

OPEN: CLOSE:

31332EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD6TH FLOOR/FLINT HILL FOURFAIRFAX VA 22030

ATTN: KIMBERLY C. CLEMENT

70634FRANKLIN RESEARCH CENTER20TH AND RACE STREETS

PHILADELPHIA PA 19103ATTN: CONTRACT OFFICE

60198GA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.P.O. BOX 85608

SAN DIEGO CA 92138ATTN, R.M. BURGOYNE

======e======e======cze=== =======-=-

23202GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY175 CURTNER AVEM/C 353SAN JOSE -CA 95125

ATTN: H.W. BASSETT

31953GEOTRANS, INC.250 EXCHANGE PLACESUITE AHERNDON VA 22070

ATTN: JAMES 0. RUMBAUGH. III

29071GOLDER ASSOCIATES, INC.410A 148TH AVENUE, N.E.

REDMOND WA 98052ATTN: DONALD E. BUTLER

== == ======…========---

31518FLUOR DANIEL1627 K STREET, N.W.

WASHINGTON DCATTNI VINCENT J. KAVLICK

20006

14118FRED C HART ASSOCIATES INC.530 FIFTH AVENUE

NEW YORK NY 100365166ATTNs BRENDA I. LUDWIG=scs = = =====ees ====== =============

24002GENERAL DYNAMICS SERVICES CO. -12101 WOODCREST EXECUTIVE DR.

ST. LOUIS MO 63141ATTN! SARAH C. KOPPES

16535GENERAL PHYSICS CORP.10650 HICKORY RIDGE ROAD

COLUMBIA MD 21044ATTNs N.L. KNIGHT

13320GILBERT/COMMONWEALTH INCP.O.BOX 1498*

READING PA 19603ATTNs ROBERT A. BURNS

e===e~es~c==ee==== === == == == == =

13059GRUMMAN CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT & MARKElM/S B20-05*

BETHPAGE NYATTNI P. FLOYD THOMAS

1 1714358(

……-

31517GRUMMAN DATA SYSTEMS1355 BEVERLY ROAD

1 16798: H & R TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES: 575 OAK RIDGE TURNPIKE: P. 0. BOX 215I OAK RIDGE TNI ATTNs ANN H. HANSEN

MCLEAN VAATTNs JUDY F. CAVANAUGH

22101 37330

* -

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPAB IL I TYR0423620 PROCIUREMENTDATE: JUN 10,87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST

…====== ===S====5==========

& EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMOPERATIONSBY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE

…== = = = = = = = == = ===… =

RFP: RPO1-87RW00134 B/NC:SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT* PROGRAM

OPENI CLOSE:===========================

30722HANSON ENGINEERS, INC.1525 SOUTH SIXTH STREET

SPRINGFIELD IL 627032886ATTN: SERGIO A. PECORI, P.E.

14841HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES*P.O. BOX 578*

NOVATO CA 94948ATTN: ROBERTA A. ONES

; 31952: HARBRIDGE HOUSE. INC.1 1725 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAYI SUITE 600I ARLINGTON VA 22202: ATTN: ADRIANNE M. JEWELL

IIIIIIIIIII

90610 IHARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY150 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE

CHICAGO IL 606064288ATTN: PETER J. CONROY :

======= = = = = = ======= …== =

28337HOLMES AND NARVER, INC.1025 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W.STE 507WASHINGTON DC 20036

ATTN: JOSEPH A. MALLEY====== ===== == = == = = = = =s = s

31568IMPELL CORPORATION a350 LENNON LANE

WALNUT CREEK CA 94598ATTN: CHARLES D. KATZ

…===============ss_-======== … ==

=======_~ == == == = = = = = = = = = ,

31954HARRIS CORPORATIONSOFTWARE OPERATION (R-1)P.O. BOX 98000MELBOURNE FL 32902ATTN: F.A.-TRANFA

…S=========== == = …======

60307HOLMES AND NARVER INC.6501 AMERICAS PARKWAY, NESTE 700ALBUQUERQUE NM 87110ATTN! CARLOS MARTEL

=========== ====== ======

94006ICF INC.1850 K STREET, N.W.INTERNATIONAL SQUAREWASHINGTON - DC 20006ATTNI KAREN RAVENSBERGEN

====S===S=SS============= = = == =

30571INTEGRATED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY19636 CLUB HOUSE ROADSUITE 110GAITHERSBURG MI 20879ATTN: CHRISTINE DRAPER

23201INTERA TECHNOLOGIES INC685u AUSTIN CENTER BLVDSTE 300AUSTIN TX 78731ATTN: BILLY G. MILLICAN

26696J.A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANYONE SOUTHEXECUTIVE PARK6060 ST. ALBANS STREETCHARLOTTE NC 28287

ATTN: WILLIAM A. LEE

29068INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

1 600 MARYLAND AVENUE, S.W.: STE 755 EASTI WASHINGTON DC 20024

ATTN: JUDITH L. WHEAT= ==============…========

27912JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.251 SOUTH LAKE AVENUE

I PASADENAATTN: GEORGE YOUNG

CA -1I")I

4 -

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITYR0423620 PROCUREMENTDATE: JUN 10,87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST


OPENs

28711 iJAYCOR1608 SPRINGHILL ROAD

VIENNA VA 221802270 1ATTN: LEE ANN WALTER :

28680KAISER ENGINEERS1117 N. 19TH ST.STE 00 1ARLINGTON VA 22209 :ATTN: DONALD L. LEoUErTER,t. Is

25576KCI1025 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W.SUITE703WASHINGTON DC 20036ATTN: ELIZABETH T. DELLY

30646L. LEHMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.1103 W. BURNSVILLE PARKWAYSUITE 107BURNSVILLE MN 55337 1ATTN: JOHN W. MORLEY= = =--=- === =====---== =

31955LOGICON, INC.901 N. WASHINGTON STREET

ALEXANDRIA VA 22314ATTN: MOIRA T. ROBERTS

31515LOS ALAMOS TEHCNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.6501 AMERICAS PARKWAY, N.E.SUITE 900ALBUQUERQUE NM 87110ATTN: CHARLES SCHELBERO

========== ===S==2======== = …=====

&c EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMOPERATIONSBY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE

B/NC:PROGRAM

CLOSE:

31956JOHN KAMERRER618 18TH AVENUE

CLARKSON WA 92403ATTN: JOHN KAMERRER

========== ==========:

28680KAISER ENGINEERS1117 N. 19TH ST.STE 00ARLINGTON VAATTNs MIREYA ESPINOSA

22209

31516KENNY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY250 NORTHGATE PARKWAY

WHEELING IL 60090ATTNs JAMES C. KENNY

16036LABAT-ANDERSON, INC.1111 19TH STREET NORTHSUITE 600ARLINGTON VA 22209ATTN: SUSIE WILCHER

===S======= = = …=======

92023LOS ALAMOS TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC1650 TRINITY DRIVEP.O. BOX 410LOS ALAMOS NM 87544ATTN: JOLENE A. BYERS

29064MAC TECHNICAL SERVICES CO.P.O. BOX 85404

SAN DIEGO CA 92138ATTN: ALEXA WOODS

== == == == == = ,= == == = =====.

60200MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS COMPANYP.O. BOX 85404

SAN DIEGO CAATTN: DARRELL 0. HUBBARD

: 10411: MERIDIAN CORPORATION: 5113 LEESBURG PIKE: STE 700. FALLS CHURCH

ATTN: KAREN JACKSONVA '..2C)4 1

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY & EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMR0423620 PROCUREMENT OPERATIONSDATE: JUN 10,87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST Y PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE E

…== = = = = = = = == = = = = = = ==== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = :


OPEN5

21456METCALF EDDY. INC.P.O. BOX 4043

WOBURN MA 018884043 1ATTN: JILL A. HOGUE

29061MORRISON-KNUDSEN ENGINEERS, INC. :P.O. BOX 79*

BOISE ID 83707ATTN: ROBERT J. WEILER

== == = == = =… ======== == = = = =

31957 INORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF CRIME & PUBLIC *1116 W. JONES STREET :

B/NC:PROGRAM

CLOSE:

13335MK-FERGUSON COMPANYPOWER DIVISIONONE ERIEVIEW PLAZACLEVELAND OH 44114ATTN5 RONALD A. SLABE

========== =========

31514NIEHAUS AND ASSOCIATES3704 STATE STREETSUITE 200SANTA BARBARA CA 93105ATTN: ROBERT D. NIEHAUS, PH.D.

11681NUCLEAR ASSURANCE CORPORATION5720 PEACHTREE PARKWAY

NORCROSS GA 30092ATTN: W.J. LEE

…===============…========

22405NUCLEAR SUPPORT SERVICES, INCP.O. BOX 3120*

HERSHEY PA 17033ATTN5 BRIAN BOOK

31513NUMATEC2550 M STREET N.W..SUITE 400WASHINGTON DC 20037ATTN: NANCY R. LANG

==tZ ==== S:== === = = = = = = =

RALEIGHATTN: H.L. REESE

NC 27611 IIII

31512NUCLEAR PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.1 HIRED HAND ROAD

WASHINGTON OK 73093ATTN: RICHARD HASTINGS

31958NUCOM/BNFL2926 92ND AVENUE E.

PUYALLUP WA- 98371ATTN: DAVID SNEDEKER= = = = XIC sX X ~ X _ X = = = = = = =

92044NUS CORPORATION910 CLOPPER ROAD

1 23884: NUTECH, INC.t 145 MARTINVALE LANE

. SAN JOSE CA 95119ATTN: DR. JOHN V. MASSEY, PH.D

:== == …

GAITHERSBURG MD 208781399ATTN: CAROLINE C. CORRELL

==== == = = ======-= = = = =

30423PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADE AND DOUGLAS,*1625 VAN NESS AVENUE, 4TH FL.

: 10655; PEER CONSULTANTS INC: 1160 ROCKVILLE PIKES SUITE 21102

' ROCKVILLE MD 205(8521 ATTN: LILIA A. ARON-ROBIN$'-:N

SAN FRANCISCOATTN: RICHARD F. HARI

CA 941093678

__________~A _ _ _ -__-_ -==-= -==-= -=5-==- = -==-2-

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITYR0423620 PROCUREMENTDATE: JUN 10.87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST

RFP! RPOl-87RW00134SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT*

OPEN:

11026PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION1500 PLANNING RESEARCH DRIVEMAIL STOP 4S5MCLEAN VA 22102ATTN: TINA M. PAGE

31511QUATERNARY INVESTIGATIONSP.O. BOX 20056

SAN BERNARDINO CA 92406ATTN: TONY MORGAN

16682RALPH M. PARSONS COMPANY1101 FIFTEENTH STREET N.W.

WASHINGTON DC 20005ATTN: ANNE STREET

==========s===========e==== …=s=

14720RAND CORPORATION2100 M STREET NW

WASHINGTON DC 200371270 1ATTN: PROPOSAL MANAGER

=--==…=== =-====s=========

76421REEDY ASSOCIATES103 ALBRIGHT WAY

LOS GATOS CA 95030ATTN: JOHN V. MASSEY

30554RJO ENTERPRISES* INC.4550 FORBES BLVD.

LANHAM MD 20706ATTN: LINDA BRENTON

=========s==e======…======= =

& EXPERIENCE SOIRCE SYSTEMOPERATIONSBY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE 1

B/NC:REPOSITORY PROGRAM

CLOSE!

16623PRECISION MANAGMENT ANALYSIS. INC405 MILFAN DRIVE

CAPITOL HEIGHTS MD 20743ATTN: . EDWARD LARSON

13337RALPH M. PARSONS COMPANY1133 FIFTEENTH STREETM N.W.*

WASHINGTONATTNS K. ANNE STREET

DC 200052701

…= =

21561RAMCO10975 TORREYANA ROADSUITE 101SAN DIEGO CA 92121ATTN: NANCY BYERS

31510RE/SPEC INC.P.O. BOX 7253824 JET DRIVERAPID CITYATTN: JOE L. RATIGAN

SD 57709

30221RISK ENGINEERING, INC.5255 PINE RIDGE ROAD

GOLDEN COATTNi ALFRED H. BALCH

80403

31509ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL2230 E. IMPERIAL HIGHWAY

EL SEGUNDOATTN: R.F. STEHLE

CA w945

13338ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE TR1049 CAMINO DOS RIOSPO BOX 1085THOUSAND OAKS CA 91360ATTN: DFENNIS EHRI

IIIIII

12438ROGERS AND ASSOC ENGINEERING P BOX 330

SALT LAKE CITYATTN: BETTIE BAILEY

UT :341 100:33

- - - - - - - - - - - ---

AUTOMATED :ONTRACTOR CAPABILITY & EXPERIENCE SOIURCE SYSTEMR0423620 PROCUREMENT OPERATIONSDATE: JUN 10,87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST BY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE 1(

=-=--…==== =…====================…=============

RFP: RPOl-87RW00134SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT*

OPEN:========~== = ====== == = = = = = = =

70790ROGERS GOLDEN AND HALPERN1216 ARCH STREET6TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA PA 19107 :

ATTN: JACK A. HALPERN :

14532ROY F. WESTON, INC.WESTON WAY

WEST CHESTER PA 19380ATTN: JACK C. NEWELL, P.E.

…============ == =…============

18211SARGENT AND LUNDY55 EAST MONROE STREETROOM 3F12CHICAGO IL 60603 :ATTN: D. J. KASKIE a

16551SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC :P.O. BOX 3722

ALBUQUERQUE NM 87190ATTN: JAN HUTCHISON / BID DESK

= = = = = === ==-= zz = s= = =

92032SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP.:1710 GOODRIDGE DR.13-4, RM 1315MCLEAN VA 221023799 1ATTN: MARY TRYKOSKI

B/NC:PROGRAM

CLOSE:

31959ROSS-MCNATT, INC.1745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.SUITE 300ARLINGTON VA 22202ATTN: TOBIN R. MCNATT

============ = ========…==

76602S-CUBEDP.O. BOX 1620

LA JOLLA CA 92038ATTN: PATRICIA ELLENBARGER

=C=C====S…==--S========= …===

22457SC&A, INC8200 RIDING RIDGE PLACE

MCLEAN VA 22101ATTN: GAIL COHEN

= = _ = = = = = = =…= = …= =

30544SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, INC.12223 PINE PARK COURTP.O. BOX 729FAIRFAX VA 22030ATTN: DIRECTOR, STI

23748SEEHUUS & HART ASSOCIATES, INC1978 OAK RIDGE TURNPIKE

OAK RIDGE TN 37830ATTN, R. J. HART

16439SHANNON AND WILSON INC1109 NORTH 38TH STREETP.O. BOX C-30313SEATTLE WA 981038067ATTN: RICHARD H. GATES======== =======S=SS====

28124SHELADIA ASSOCIATES, INC.15825 SHADY GROVE ROADSUITE 100ROCKVILLE MD 20850ATTN: DILIP BHARGAVA

: 11798: SHAPIRO & ASSOCIATES INC: THE SMITH TOWER: 506 SECOND AVENUEi SEATTLE WA 981041 ATTN: SUSAN SANDER

1 14294SKELLY AND LOY2601 NORTH FRONT ST.

: HARRISBURG PA: ATTN: MICHAEL A. NAWROCKI

17110

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - - ---

AUTOMATED CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY & EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMR0423620 PROCUREMENT OPERATIONSDATE: JUN 10,87 ** CURRENT SOURCE LIST BY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE 1

…======C========== …=

RFP: RPO1-87RW00134SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CON-*

OPENs AUG 01, 1987========================

22712SRA CORPORATION2000 15TH STREET NORTHSUITE 1100ARLINGTON VA 22201ATTN: ROSE MARY MIMS

92000STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERINGP.O. BOX 2325

BOSTON MA 02107ATTN: CF. GROCHMAL

16606SYSTEMATIC MGMT SERVICES INC.800 COMMERCE ROAD WESTSUITE 500NEW ORLEANS LA 70123ATTN: ROBERT A. MATHISON

…========S============_===

94002TASC55 WALKERS BROOK DRIVE 1*:

READING MA 01867ATTN: PAUL E. HEINTEL

76354 :TECHMATICS, INC2611 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE. 10001ARLINGTON VA 22202ATTN: DIANNE SMITH :

12067TERRATEK, INCUNI4EASITY RESEARCH PARK400 WAKARA WAYSALT LAKE CITY UT 84108ATTN: KELLY J. CARPENTER

…== = = S = = = = _ = = = = = =

B/NC:PROGRAM

CLOSE: NOV 30, 1987

18074SRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.4700 KING STREETSTE 300ALEXANDRIA VA 22302ATTN: JACQUELINE L. SWATTS

12799SVERDRUP CORPORATION801 NORTH ELEVENTH

ST. LOUIS MO 63101ATTN: VIRGINIA CAROTHERS

========_==…==========…=

12805SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS INC.101 LUCAS VALLEY ROAD

SAN RAFAEL CA 94903ATTNs JENNIE ROARK

31947TECHKNOW, INC.55 E. JACKSON BLVD.SUITE 1640CHICAGO IL 60604

ATTN: KUL B. RAZDAN

21612TERRAFORM ENGINEERS, INC.39-1/2 W. JEFFERSON AVESUITE 2NAPERVILLE IL 60540

ATTNI MICHAEL F. DUNN

97053TETRA TECH INC.630 N.ROSEMEAD BLVD.

PASEDENA CA 91107219ATTNE SYNDEY J. GORDON

23552TETRA TECH, INC11820 NORTHUP WAY, STE 100

II

II

IIII

14842THE BDM CORPORATION1801 RANDOLPH ROAD, SE

BELLEVUE WAATTN: KATHY M. BECKLEY

980051927 ALBUQUERQUEATTN! T.A. FELTS

NM 87106


RFP: RPOI-87RW00134SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT*

OPEN,…========s=============== ==

22925THE EARTH TECHNOLOGY3777 LONG BEACH BLVD.P.O. BOX 7765LONG BEACH CA 90807ATTN: RAYNETTE R. TAKIZAWA

24286 :THE ORKAND CORPORATION8484 GEORGIA AVENUESUITE 1000SILVER SPRING MD 20910ATTNS UY RENE

=_==:===== ================= = ==

16012TOUCHE ROSS AND CO.1900_M STREET N.W.

WASHINGTON DC 20036ATTNs SARA M. WEEKS

==.==== = =============-== == =

80176TRANSNUCLEAR INC.ONE NORTH BROADWAY

WHITE PLAINS NY 10601ATTN: CHARLES W. PENNINOTON

78098U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM.MAIL STOP AR-2223DIV. OF CONTRACTSWASHINGTON DC 20055ATTN: ANGELO C. GIARRATANA

====_======g=8=a===a~~s--- ==- =

& EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMOPERATIONSBY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE 1

B/NC:PROGRAM

CLOSE:

22629THE MAXIMA CORPORATION107 UNION VALLEY ROAD

OAK RIDGEATTN! ED STONE

TN 37830

31507THE QUEST GROUP1090 VERMONT AVENUE, N.W.10TH FLOORWASHINGTON DC 20005ATTNI JAMES K. MCCARTHY

31506TRANS TEXAS CONSULTANTSP.O. BOX 9419

AMARILLO TX 79105ATTN: XAVIER CHAPA

31946TRW PSGONE FEDERAL SYSTEMS PARK DRIVE

FAIRFAX VA 22033ATTNi R.H. DEFREES

=s:======s===z= ===s======

31184UNC DEFENSE GROUP67 SANDY DESERT ROADP.O. BOX 981UNCASVILLE CT 063820981ATTNS DAVID THAXTON, C-9

31567UNC GEOTECH :P.O. BOX 140002597 B 3/4 ROAD IGRAND JUNCTION CO 815025504 :ATTNI ROBERT F. POTTER :

==== ======= ==============… =

92035UNITED ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTOR30 SOUTH 17TH STREETP. 0. BOX 8223PHILADELPHIA PA 19101ATTNI PAUL J. MARGARITIS

===== ==ss= ==== = = = = = = ==

31505UNIVERISTY OF PITTSBURGH911 WILLIAM PITT UNION

: 30769: URS CORPORATION0 501 J STREET: SUITE 506O SACRAMENTO CA 95814: ATTN, NANCY J. HANSON

PITTSBURGH PAATTN: GEORGE R. WHITE

15260

- - _=gwok


== = == = == = =… = = = = = = =

RFP: RP01-87RW00134SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONT*

OPEN'== == = == = == A === =====…== = = = =

31504URS CORPORATION3131 ELLIOTT AVENUESUITE 300SEATTLE WA 98121ATTNI JULIE POWERS

== == == == =… = ======= = = = = = = =

28537VIAR AND COMPANY300 NORTH LEE STREET

ALEXANDRIA VA 22314 1ATN: ALAN H. BLUMENTHAL

============e= = ==== ======== ==== == = =

10376WASHINGTON CONSULTING GROUP IN1625 EYE STREET, N.W.STE 214WASHINGTON DC 20006ATTN: DONALD ROSE

====== = ======== ====== …===e==

13334WESTEC SERVICES, INC2260 BUTLER PIKE I* -:

PLYMOUTH MEETING PA 194621412 :ATTNI DONALD M. WRAY

===== ====================== = =

31503WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATIONNUCLEAR WASTE DEPARTMENTP.O. BOX 399, MAIL BIN 4MADISON PA 156630399ATTNt SHELIA LITTLE

31918:WHITESHELL RESEARCHCOMMERCIAL OPERATIONS OFFICEATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LTD.PINAWA/ MANITOBA RO* CAATTN: R.O. SOCHASKIv P. ENG.

& EXPERIENCE SOURCE SYSTEMOPERATIONSBY PROPOSAL REQUEST ** PAGE 1'

B/NC:REPOSITORY PROGRAM

CLOSE'Ac====== = = ====…======

31948VANCE GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS7726 OLD SPRINGHOUSE ROAD

MCLEAN VA 22102ATTN: SUSAN KOLBENSTETTER

…=_ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

80015VIKING SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL121 N. HIGHLAND AVENUESTE 203PITTSBURGH PAATTNt JACK-SALUJA

15206

~~===-s=-==============

13332WASTECHEM CORPORATIONONE KALISA WAY*

PARAMUS NJ 07652ATTNI MYRON M. KACZMARSKY

25255WESTERN RESEARCH CORPORATION512 UNIVERSITYP.O. BOX 1089LARAMIE WY 82070ATTN: JAMES . THOMPSON

13336WESTON, ROY F.8TH FLOOR955 LENFANT PLAZA SWWASHINGTON DC 20024ATTNt JOHN COWLIES

10157WILLIAMS BROTHERS ENGINEERINGRESOURCE SCIENCES PARK6600 SOUTH YALE AVENUETULSA OK 74136ATTN: RAYMOND C. HARBERT

==s============ = ===== === =

23203WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS1390 MARKET STREETSTE 250SAN FRANCISCO CAATTN: KAREN PATWARDHAN

1 71138I Z. INC1 8630 FENTON STREETI SUITE 510: SILVER SRPING MD 20910: ATTN: CRAIG J. LITTLE

94102

ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST GUIDELINES FOR THE SYSTEMSENGINEERING, DEVELOPMENT, ANI) MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR FOR THEOCRWM NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

1. PURPOSE:

The potential for org.ziizational eoinfliets or interest (OCI) exists among a widearray of firms currently performing a diversity of OC RWM eontract requirementsand desiring to propose under the subject Request for Proposals (RF1'). Thecontractors previously or currently performing evaluation serviees or activities,technieal consulting and management support serviees and professional services, aidother OCRWM contractual workseopes where special OCI provisions are included inthe contract, and supporting the program at eight primary locations (Chicago,Nevada, Richland, Oak Ridge, Idaho, Alhuqwerquie, San Franeiseo, andHeadquarters), are faced with a potential OCI determination trom a bias and/or anunfair competitive advantage standpoint with regard to their eligibility for awardunder the subject Source Evaluation Board (SEB) acquisition. The potential conflictsof interest may also apply to subh ontr actors and consultants at all eight loeations.The primary purpose of this paper is to set forth guidelines addressing areas ofpotential organizational conflicts of interest.

The Government desires to conduct a full and open competition with the broadestparticipation by industry as is practieal. There are numerous ongoing contracts andsubcontracts related to areas of the S:EB statement of work. The contractorsperforming these activities have the advantage of incumbency (the normal flow ofbenefits from the performance of the contract), which is recognized as a "fair"competitive advantage. lei order to encour1age the broadest competition,notwithstanding ineumbeney, ample information must be disseminated. Companicsnot currently performing work unider OCRWM program contracts must decidewhether to risk Slubstatiil hid aid proposal costs, time, and energy to competeagainst incumbents. Hence, a secondary purpose of this paper is to announce theDepartment's intent to estahlisl Public Reading Rooms for encouraging om1petitionby providiig ample information to all prospective bidders, inluding inforimat ion notnormally or otherwise made available under a competition. 1i sumiar-y, theseguidelines provide a framework for unirorm and equitable treatment of allprospective proposers wider the subje t RFP, address areas of potential conflicts ofinterest, and permit the widest competition possible wider te subject RFPl.

I. BACKGROUND OF THE REQUIREMENT

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWI'A) of 1982 established a national policy forsafely storing, trwsporting, and disposing of spent nuclear fuel and high-levelwaste. Under the Act, DOE has the respoLsibilities to develop, s(hedule, site,construct, and operate deep-mined geologic waste repositories; and to performresearch, development, and demomnstration related to the disposal of spent fuel aidhigh-level waste. In addition, the Act required the )OE to submit to Congress aproposal for thet constructimi of a monitored retrievable storage facility for spentInuelea r(!l id HIighi-level waSte.

- 2 -

In May 1986, the President approved the DOE recommendation that sites in Nevada,Texas, and Washington be selected for detailed characterization as candidate sitesfor the first repository. In addition to environmental and socioeconomic studies, thedetailed site characterization process will involve construeting exploratory shaftsbetween 1,000 and 4,0m reet deep to determine ro(*k conditions at repository level.The extensive data to he collceted durin-g site clarterizationi will he used indeveloping models to prediet the performue or eaeh site relative to te NuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC) and Environmental Protection Agency (EIlA)requirements and in conducting a comparative evaluation of the three candidatesites. In addition, development of a waste package auid design of a repositorysuitable to each candidate site will he conducted and used in the comparativeevaluation of te. site. This site characterization pro ess will culminate in both thepreparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluating the threecandidate sites and the selection of one site for the first reposit ory,. for whic h aLicense Application will be submitted to the NRC. In accordanee with the drartMission Plan Amendment, the current DOE schedule calls for the EIS to he issued inOctober 1994, for the President to recommend a site for the first repository inNovember 1994, and for the Lieense Application to be submitted in January 1995.Following a 3-year period for review of the License Application, construction of thefirst repository is scheduled to begin in January 1998, with initial operations in theyear 2003.

The DOE Richland, Chicago, and Nevada Operations Offices have each beenassigned projeet mauiagemncnt responsibility by OCRWM and have each established aproject office for one of the three candidate locations for siting a high level nuclearwaste repository. To date, the Project Offices have been directing contractorperformance of: characterization or their respective sites, desigil and constructionof exploratory shafts, site-specific waste package and repository design anddevelopment, and ompliance with environmental and licensing regulatoryrequirements. Several of the contractors are, under DOE direction, supporting theProject Offices in integrating the work of the numerous project participantts, such asother DOE contractors, national laboratories, aid interactions with state ageneiesand local governmental entities, and have asisted DOE in defining, pumnling,budgeting, scheduling, and executing site-specific project work.

Now that the initial programmatic requirements have been met, the inereasilgcomplexity of the repository program, and the need to ensure consistency amomig allof the critical elements and across all sites, requires a single managementcontractor to ensure:

o Consistency in critical test and evaluation work that will lead to bothsuceessful site selet io and li eensing.

o Improved specification of 1IQ requireinents to project teams, leading toclearer widerstanding aid iproved perrormaine.

- 3 -

o Reduction/removal of duplieation of work done for each of the candidatesites. Currently, tree repository project offiees are using different setsof contraetors to design aspects oF the repository that would beessentially the saine at all sites.

O Development of a single set ot criteria mid stu(ldards for sitecharaeterizationt and evaluation of test results; consistent applieatioll ofcriteria and standards across projects.

O Centralization of maiagement of key program aid project priorities itHeadquarters and increased project office o(us on construction offacilities, data collection and prelinmtimy anialysis, aid istitut ionalinteractions.

In the area of the Monitored Retrieval Storage (MRS) Facility, DOE has identifiedthree potential sites for an MRS facility and site-specifie designs are being preparedfor a preferred site aid two alternatives. These designxs and plais for an MRSfacility in the Nuelear Waste Management System were submitted to Congress onMareh 30, 1987, for authorizeatiom of u MRS faeility. If approved by Conlgres, 1)OEplans to submit a License Application to the NRC thirty (30) months afterCongressional approval. DOE n licipates an additional thirty (30) months ror theNRC to review and approve the liCenmis Applivat ion before eolnstrit ion ol the MRSfacility would hegin. Initial operation of the facility would start about 10 yewsafter Congressional approval.

Finally, in thc area of traisportation responsibilities, OCRWM must develop asystem to transport spent nuclear Ful and high-level radioactive waste to theFederal waste management facilities when they are able to receive it. A nuitmb-r ofdevelopmental studics are ongoing in this area.

Hi. SATEMENT OF WORK

The Contractor will he responsible for design and analysis of tine! Nuclear WasteManagemetit System to cnsure thI:t the system is optimiized and that the iiterralesbetweei the system elemenmts arL (learly specified and controlled, includingtransportation considerations. Tho Contractor will also he assigle(d spe(ificresponsibilities to ensure that t he first repository candidate sites ar characterizedand that te selected site is engineered nd developed through recipt of an N RC 'Construction Authorization. T! Contrl(tor will assist DOE in obtainilng tlhe N RClicenses. Beyond receipt of the constriuetion Authorization for the repository, theContractor will he equired to perform Titl I l)esigii and Inspetion and to supportDOE and the selected repository opertor in obtaining the licensie to operate therust repository and in prepariig f'or a(-(e(ptui(.(! testiig and operations. A primaryaspect of the Contractor's responsibilities will be to ensure that all wor isconducted in a structured and systemnat i marimer that meets the teclulical,schedule, cost, safety, environmnental, quality, and interface requirements and tiatit meets tile regilatory requirementsmt or e N RC uand E.'A.

- 4 -

The Contractor will be assigned responsibilities for the second repository in areassuch as integrating second repository requirements with the other elements or tleNuclear Waste Management System and assisting second repository programparticipants to comply with the NWPA and ensure that tecniiques, strategy options,design coneepts, mid plans developed or thc first repository are utilized whereappropriate and that lessons learned on the first repository are ieorporated intosecond repository planning and implementation.

Should DOE receive Congressional approval for the construet ion of a Monit oredRetrievable Storage (MRS) faeility as part of the Nuclear Waste ManagenientSystem, the Contructor will he requir!d to provide the design and lietsing serviCesfor the MRS. The Contraotor will provide ttO design mnd lensing servicves uile.ssand until DOE makes a decision to transfer detailed design of the MRS to a separaterequirement to be compteJ. Te C0omit.t 4r would be required toassist i thetransition of that workscope to tle other colitraetor. In any event, the (Contractorwill continue to retain the integration function of the MRS into te overall NuclearWaste Management System.

The Contractor's responsibilities will include integrating the work of variousprogram participanits, suth as national laboratories, other lederal agenvies, an(DOE prime contractors condueting work in support of the programit . The Coitrtorwill also assist )OE in its intertetioni with nl l(*ted States azid Indian Tribes toensure that the consultation and (ooperation r!quired by tile Act or its sucessrlimplementation is aehieved. All responsibilities assigited to the Contractor will hesubject to progrm authorization and techical direction by CRWM.

IV. BACKGROUNI) TO OC'l

In accordance with DEAR 909.570-4, two questiois shouldd generally he atsked ildetermining whether OCI exists:

(1) Is the conitretor being given an tuirair coInpt itive advanI ape in futurework due to the perrormnce or a particular conitaet?

(2) Are there eonFlicting roles or interests whichi might his a contractor'sjudgment in relation to its work on a particular cont ra(t or theDepartment?

The ultimate determination ts to whether OCI exists should be malde in tie light ofcommon sense and good busin!SS judgment hased upon the relevant a(ts amd thework to be perforned.

An unfair com pet itive advanti age, as rferimued in the first question above, would bx!present if situations envisioned by tIh Special OCI clause were present, such as: (I)award of a onitraet (other than for follow-on telinical consulting aid managementsupport services) stetilined dirtly fromi a eonItr I-tor's performnanvc of technical

- 5 -

consulting and management support services; (2) the Statement of Work orspecification for a future competitive solicitation was prepared by an existingtechnical consulting and management support service contractor; (3) a presentcontractor with 'aceSS to and use or DOE internal information whieh had notgenerally been ma:de available to te public for at least six months used suehinformat ion to coilpete for future )()1 cont raet work.

In relation to te second question or hias, ir one or the existing integration/t(hni(*alsupport service conitr'aetors at a emididate repository site were to he succsshil inthe subject SB1 (ompetition, a part ot its responsibility would include the reviewand evaluation of data that was developed by it while continuing to provide servicesto the cognizaUt Project Ofriee. Were this sit tit ion to arise, the issue would not bewhether an apparent OCI is present; it clearly would be. Te issue is, rat her, theextent of coniflk t and whether it cai he avoided. If sueh a conrliet eiinot beavoided, award might still be made in fate of tie conflict after a deteriniiiation bythe Secretary that award is otherwise in te best interest of the Government.

V. OCI GlIDEl.INES

A. Fair Competitive Advauntage

Well over 100 prime eontraetors and sutontractors at the various Project Officesand other locations are performing work requirements generated by the OCRWMProgram Orfiee and related to the statement or work for this SEB. Most of thiswork involves the development of or access to information which gives rise to a"fair" compelitive adviuitage (the normal flow of benefits from the perform~ulee ofthe conti-aet). Notwithstamdinig this recoguized fair advantage, in the intert-st orpromoting full and open competition, t! Public Reading Rooms for this SEllrequirement contain a copy of the major prime contracts for contravitors performing,work related to this requirement and significant contract deliverables thereroiim.

B. Unfair Competitive Advantage

Only a small amount of the OC RWM program work underway involves ac-ess to anduse of information giving rise to w "tufair' cometitxive advantage. It is tis muchsmaller universe of work- to whicl the "unfair competitive advantage" wider theseGuidelines is directed.

The regulatory asx'ts of "wifair ompetitive advantage" are addressed at DE.AR909.5. The Department's Orlanizal ional conrlicts or Interest -- Special clause atDEAR 9;2.209-72 (or DOE PR 9-1.408-2) is icluded in many eontra ts aidsubcontracts awarded in response to OCRWM requirements to date and will berequired for inclusion in many follow-on mid other plaumied awards currently inprogrss. This clause, aid te nature of the work accomplished uider OCRWMcontracts, have direct O(, impliceatioms for the subject S1l competition. Hreafter,this clause is referred toM thJ Spcial OC t clauste. (Se E'losum 1.)

- 6 -

Subparagraph (b)(lXi) of the Special OCI clause addresses ineligibility to participatein work which stems directly from other DOE contracts. Subparagraph (b)(I)(ii)addresses ineligibility to participate in work which is based ont Statements of Work(SOW) or specirieations prepaurd by the contractor and to he use i (ompetitiveprocurements. The subject SOW did not stein directly from suty exist ig eolltr aet.Furthermore, the SOW for the suhjeet aequisition was exclusively prepared by theGovernment.

Subparagraph (b)(Xi) of the Special OCI clause reads as follows:

If the contractor, in the performance of this contract, obtaitisaess to inforimation, such as Departmental plans, policies,reports, studies, financial plans, internal data protected by thePrivavy At or 1974 (P.l. 93-579), or data whit-lo has iot tweireleased or otherwise made available to the public, theContractor agrees that without prior written approval or theContraclting Officer it shill not: (a) use such information forany private purpose unless the iformation has been relea-tsed

* or otherwise made available to the public; (b) compete forwork for the Department bsed oi such information for aperiod of six () months arter either- the completion of thiscontrra(*t or unt iI suell inrormiat ion is released or otherwisemade available to the public, whichever is first; ...

Some informat ion described under tl! above subparagraph ()(2)(i) of the SpecialOC elaus! Under various )OE contraets eould be of henefit to other potentialproposers in the conduet of a lull ad open coni pet it ion and will therefore be madeavailable for review at Pulblic Reading Rooms. Additionally, sone coitractdeliverables under exist ijg OCRWM contraets are pertinent ad will also be madeavailable for review at Public Reading Roonis by prospe( -tive orfc-rors. Superiorproposals and more meaningful competitio should result from making thisinformation available to all potential proposers.

Public Reading Rooms at three locations will be! established by the S111 lls the.repository of information related to the Stateimen o Worl for th! Nuclear WLSteManagement System. The Reading Rooms will contain a.ny (h)(2)(i)-type informat ionunder DOE contracts which is considered necessuy to respond to the solicitationrequirements. Additionally, the Reading Rooms will contain the major exist ingOCRWM prime contracts and pertinwent deliverables. The information in tiheReading Rooms, while not all-inclusive of already publiely available doeuntetits onthe OCRWM program, will contain inforination which has not been previouslyreleased or otherwise made available to the public and which is considered necessaryby the SEB to respond to the solicitation.

Potential proposcrs arm cautioned that unless the ()(2Xi)-type information is in theReading Rooms, any proposer who h:L te SPec(ial OCI clause in his DOE contract orsubontract and has av(vess to adl th U.Se of inrormation under his DOE contraet orsubeontraet which has not been releatsed or otherwise made available to the publiefor at least six months as set forth i subparagraph (b)(2)(i) of tme Special OCIclause, is prohibited from using such inforinuation i the compext it ion lor thisrequirement, without approval of his Contr.t ing Officer.

- 7 -

Each proposer who has the Special OCI clause in his contract or subcontract and hasaccess to and use of (b)(2)(i) type iformation as a result of te )OE contract orsubcontract whieh haus not been tmtade public for at least six montlis, will be requiredto demonstrate its a part of hiis proposal that unless the (h)(2)(i)-type information isin the reading room for this SEBl requirtment and/or le has the Contrac tingOfficer's approval, slh irormtat ion walS not used in competing for this requireieit.

C. Bias

The solicitation will require tat all proposers provide a statemelit which deseribesall relevant factors coneerning any past, present, or currently plhuined interest(financial, contractual, or orgaizational or otherwise) relating to the work to beperformed under the instawt OCRWM requirement and hearing on whet her theofferor has a possible organizat ional conflict of int vrvst wit II respect to being ableto render impartial, teehnically sound, and objective assistane or advice. Everyproposer will be required by tIle solicitation to fully disclose all relevant aetors.Furthermore, proposers will e required to identify in the proposal specirie plats toavoid or mitigate known conflicts or interest.

D. Proposal Preparat ion Confliets

Proposers who are DOE (ontraetors and sul'xontratctors will also be required todemonstrate as part of the proposal how they avoided eonlliets i the prepar-atiol ortheir proposal. Exampies of a(iotis to avoid (osilli(ts include sepsuatioll ofpersonitel working under existing DOE contraets and slxontraets in any interval(s)during which they may be contributing to proposal preparation a(tIivities, controls olcominuiflatiotet Itween proposal prepir-ation persouitel and personiel p irrormingundor existiig DOE coitraets wnd sub ontratc ts, et(. During tle iiteval(s) thaltpersonnel arm utilized on proposal preparation activities, they imust be separatedfrom their Government, contract activities, and all proposal preparation activitiesmust be conducted in non-Government facilit ies.

Proposers having contractual obligat ions under existing contracts will be expectedto minimize the impact wder those existimag contracts as a result or teir choosingto participate in this competitioll. Prl ormauKc of present tontract respousiiilit icsmust continue to be te primary mission during the remaining term of tilecontract(s). Any suela contractors or subcontractors arc precluded by theircontracts from directly (harging existing contracts or subcontracts for the cost ofpreparing proposals for the Si'll requirement, i.e., bid and proposal costs. Thecognizant DOE Ope!rations Offices have eemi requested to ensure that tecontractors adhere to those provisions of their contracts.

. Represent at ions and l)isclosures

All offerors will be required to follow existing administrative olerating procedureswhich prescribe OCI Represemitat ion wuid l)im-losIure foriats. Secifically, caclofferor will he required to complee eitler thP OCI ReprsIn at ion or l)isclosUreStatement, aloig wit te questionunaire forumi set ort at Eclosure 2 to theseGuidelines. Any additioial que-st iois req!iire-d for the omlxpet it Wio will he added toEncloSure 2 and inorporated in the solicit atiot.

- 8 -

F. Determinations Re: OCI

Potential proposers should be aware or the responsibilities or the SER and SourceSeleetion Official to evaluate all facets submitted in response to DEAR 909.570-15and other solieitat ion requir'ments. 'roposers are urged to read DOE Aequisit ionRegulation 909.570-9 before incurring proposal preparation expenses. If the SoutrveSelection Oificial fiiids that a orgmnizat ional conflicts o iterest exists, theContracting Officer shall:

(I) Disqualify the offeror from award; or

(2) Avoid s h confliets. Avoidance may be feasible in some eases bysuch aetions as the inclusion of appropriate conditions in tlheresulting contraet; having eurrent contraet(s) totally or partiallyterminated; independent review of work produets; ete.; or

(3) If suceh conflicts Cauiiiot he avoided by ani appropriate contraetclause or other ine:ans, and the Se rctary has, nevertheless,determined that award of the contract to the offeror is in the bestinterest of the u.S., the contract may be awarded.

Pursuant to the above, proposers; a advised that organizational onfliets ofinterest may be a asis for disqualifiat ion from award.

Enclosures

ENCLOSURE 1Page I of 2

DEAR 92.209-72 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST-SPECIAL CLAUSE (APR 1984)

(a) Purpose. The primary purpose of this clause is to aid in ensuringthat the Contractor (1) is not biased because of its past, present, orcurrently planned Interests (financial, contractual, organizational, orotherwise) which relate to the work under this contract, and (2) does notobtain any unfair competitive advantage over other parties by virtue of itsperformance of this contract.

(b) Scope. The restrictions described herein shall apply to performanceor participation by the Contractor and any of its affiliates or theirsuccessors in Interest (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Contractor")in the activities covered by this clause as a prime Contractor, subcontractor,cosponsor, joint venturer, consultant, or In any similar capacity.

(1) Technical consulting and management support services.

(I) The Contractor shall be ineligible to participate in anycapacity in Department contracts, subcontracts, or proposals therefor(solicited or unsolicited) which stem directly from the Contractor'sperformance of work under this contract. Furthermore, unless so directed inwriting by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall not perform any.technical consulting or management support services work under this contracton any of Its products or services or the products or services of another firmIf the Contractor Is or has been substantially involved in their developmentor marketing. Nothing in this subparagraph shall preclude the Contractor fromcompeting for follow-on contracts for technical consulting and managementsupport services.

(ii) If the Contractor under this contract prepares a completeor essentially complete Statement of Work or specifications to be used incompetitive procurements, the Contractor shall be Ineligible to perform orparticipate in any capacity In any contractual effort which Is based on suchStatement of Work or specifications. The Contractor shall not Incorporate itsproducts or services in such Statement of Work or specifications unless sodirected ir writing by the Contracting Officer, in which case the restrictionin this subparagraph shall not apply.

(iii) Nothing In this paragraph shall preclude the Contractorfrom offering or selling ts standard commercial items to the Government.

(2) Access to and use of Information.

(I) If the Contractor, in the performance of this contract,obtains access to information, such as Department plans, policies, reports,studies, financial plans, internal data protected by the Privacy Act of 1974(Pub. L. 93-579)-, or data which has not been released or otherwise madeavailable to the public, the Contractor agrees that without prior writtenapproval of the Contracting Officer it shall not: (a) use such informationfor any private purpose unless the Information has been released or otherwisemade available to the public; (b) compete for work for the Department based onsuch Information for a period of six (6) months after either the completion ofthis contract or until such nformation Is release or otherwise made availableto the public, whichever is first; (c) submit an unsolicited proposal to theGovernment which s based on such information until one year after suchinformation is released or otherwise made available to the public; and (d)release such Information unless such information has previously been releasedor otherwise made available to the public by the Department.

ENCLOSURE IPage 2 of 2

(ii) In addition, the Contractor agrees that to the extent itreceives or is given access to proprietary data, data protected by the PrivacyAct of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-679), or other confidential or privileged technical,business, or financial information under this contract, it shall treat suchinformation In accordance with any restrictions Imposed on such information.

(ill) The Contractor shall have, subject to patent, data, andsecurity clauses of this contract, the right to use technical data it firstproduces under this contract for Its private use, provided that, as of thedate of such use all reporting requirements of this contract have been met.

(c) Disclosure after award. (1) The Contractor agrees that if afteraward it discovers an organizational conflict of interest with respect to thiscontract, an immediate and full disclosure shall be made in writing to theContracting Officer which shall include a description of the action which theContractor has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflicts.The Department may, however, terminate the contract for convenience if itdeems such termination to be in the best interests of the Government.

(2) In the event that the Contractor was aware of an organizationalconflict of Interest prior to the award of this contract and did not disclosethe conflict to the Contracting Officer, the Department may terminate thecontract for default.

(d) Subcontracts. (1) The Contractor shall Include this clause,including this paragraph, in subcontracts of any tier which involveperformance or work of the type specified in (b)(1) above or access toinformation of the type covered in (b)(2) above. The terms "contract","Contractor" and "Contracting Officer" shall be appropriately modified topreserve the Government's rights.

(2) If a subcontract is to be issued for evaluation services oractivities, technical consulting or management support services work asdefined at 909.570, the Contractor shall obtain for the Department adisclosure statement or representation, in accordance with DOE regulations ineffect at the time, from each intended subcontractor or consultant. TheContractor shall not enter into any subcontract nor engage any consultantunless the Contracting Officer shall have first notified the Contractor thatthere is little or no likelihood that an organizational conflict of interestexists or that despite the existence of a conflict of Interest the award is inthe best interest of the Government.

(e) Remedies. For breach of any of the above restrictions or fornondisclosure or misrepresentation of any relevant facts required to bedisclosed concerning this contract, the Government may terminate the contractfor default, disqualify the Contractor for subsequent related contractualefforts and pursue such other remedies as may be permitted by law or thiscontract.

(f) Waiver. Requests for waiver under this clause shall be directed inwriting to the Contracting Officer and shall include a full description of therequested waiver and the reasons in support thereof. If it is determined tobe in the best interests of the Government, the Contracting Officer shallgrant such a waiver in writing.

(g) Modification. Prior to a contract modification when the Statement ofwork is modified to add new work, the period of performance is significantlyincreased, or the parties to the contract are changed, the Department willrequest and the Contractor Is required to submit either an organizationalconflict of interest disclosure or representation or an update of thepreviously submitted disclosure or representation.

- - -

ENCLOSURE 2Page 1 of 8

ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

REOUIREMENTS

In compliance with Public Law 95-39 (Sec. 401) and 95-70 (Section 10),and Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) 909.670 whichimplements these laws, your offer must provide the information andassurances called for by the forms provided in this section.

The offeror must submit (as a part of Volume I, Offer and OtherDocuments) the following documents from each of the entities 1/listed below:

1. Either the Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) (a)Representation Statement or (b) the Organizational Conflicts ofInterest (OCI) Disclosure Statement. If the OCI Disclosure Statementis signed, provide an attachment showing the Information required.

2. The OCI uestionnaire; If you answer any questions "yes," provide anattachment showing the information requested.

3. If applicable, a copy of the most current 10 K report submitted tothe Securities and Exchange Cmmisslon (SEC) and the most currentAnnual Report.

1/ The types of entities or individuals which are required to completethe forms listed above are as follows:

1. The prime contractor. (If the offeror is a joint venture,consortium, or other similar type multiple entityorganization, the information required should be provided foreach member of the proposed organization, as appropriate.)

2. The subcontractor(s) (unless the subcontractor(s) is onlyproviding supplies) and consultants at every tier.

3. All affiliates of the foregoing.

4. Any entities owned or represented by the chief executives ordirectors of: the prime contractor; any of the subcon-tractors, except for those only providing supplies; and anyof the consultants.

5. Chief executives and directors - if they will be involved inperforming the proposed work of: the prime contractor; thesubcontractors at every tier (except for subcontractors whichare only providing supplies); consultants at every tier: andall affiliates of the foregoing.

Page 2 of 8

NOTICE

Apart from other remedies allowed by law or contract, any non-disclosureor misrepresentation of relevant facts required by the OCI regulationsay result In the Department disqualifying the violator from future

Department contracts.

Your attention is also directed to Part 11, Section 1, ORGANIZATIONALCONFLICTS OF INTEREST - SPECIAL CLAUSE (DEAR 952.209-72).

DISCUSSION

It is the policy of the Department of Energy to identify and avoid ormitigate organizational conflicts of Interest (OCI) before entering intocontracts, agreements and other arrangements.

Generally, to-determine whether an organizational conflict.of interestexists, the Department considers these two questions:

o Are there conflicting roles which might bias a contractor'sjudgment in relation to its work for the Department?

o Is the contractor being given an unfair competitive advantagebased on the performance of the contract?

Department personnel will examine with particular care proposed work thatcalls for advising, consulting, or evaluating in areas that will directlyinfluence Departmental decisions about future procurements, R&D programs,production and regulatory activities.

Using common sense and good business judgment, the Contracting Officerwill determine whether an organizational conflict of interest existsafter examining all relevant facts submitted by the offeror; thestatement of work; and information gained from other sources.

If a conflict does exist, the Contracting Officer:

o shall avoid any conflicts; or

o shall disqualify the offeror from award; or

o may award the contract if the Secretary (or Secretary's designee)determines that awarding the contract, despite the conflict, isIn the best Interest of the United States. Circumstancesjustifying such a determination include situations where "thePublic exigency will not otherwise permit" and situations wherethe work or services cannot otherwise be obtained. In thesecases, clauses are Included in the contract to mitigate theconflict to the extent feasible and a notice of award spublished in the Federal Register.

Page 3 of 8

DEFINITIONS

1. The term "organizational conflicts of interest" means that a relationshipor situation exists whereby an offeror or a contractor (including chiefexecutives and directors, to the extent that they will or do becomeinvolved in the performance of the contract, and proposed consultants orsubcontractors where they may be performing services similar to theservices provided by the prime) has past, present, or currently plannedinterests that either directly or indirectly (through a client,contractual, financial, organizational or other relationship) may relateto the work to be performed under a Department contract and which (a) maydiminish its capacity to give impartial, technically sound, objectiveassistance and advice, or (b) may result in it being an unfair competitiveadvantage. It does not include the normal flow of benefits from theperformance of the contract.

2. The term affiliates" means business concerns which are affiliates of eachother when either directly or indirectly one concern or individualcontrols or has the power to control another, or when a third partycontrols or has the power to control both (See 41 CFR §1-1.601-1(e)).

3. The term "energy concern" as defined by Public Law 95-91, Section 601(b),Includes:

(a) Any person significantly engaged in the business of developing,extracting, producing, refining, transporting by pipeline, convertinginto synthetic fuel, distributing, or selling minerals for use as anenergy source, or in the generation or transmission of energy fromsuch minerals or from wastes or renewable resources;

(b) Any Person holding an interest in property from which coal, naturalgas, crude oil, nuclear material or a renewable resource iscommercially produced or obtained;

Cc) Any person significantly engaged in the business of producing,generating, transmitting, distributing, or selling electric power;

Cd) Any Person significantly engaged In development production,processing, sale or distribution of nuclear materials, facilities ortechnology; and

(e) Any person--

(1) significantly engaged in the business of conducting research,development, or demonstration related to an activity describedIn paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d); or

(2) significantly engaged In conducting such research, development,or demonstration with financial assistance under any Act thefunctions of which are vested in or delegated or transferred tothe Secretary of the Department of Energy.

Page 4 of 8

COMPLETE ONE OR THE OTHER BUT NOT BOTHContract/Proposal IRFP# DE-

OCI REPRESENTATION STATEMENT

I hereby certify (or as a representative of my organization, I herebycertify) that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, no facts existrelevant to any past, present or currently planned interest oractivity (financial, contractual, personal, organizational orotherwise) which relate to the proposed work; and bear on whether Ihave (or the organization has) a possible interest with respect to(1) being able to render Impartial, technically sound, and objectiveassistance or advice; or (2) being given an unfair 2/ competitiveadvantage.

Signature: Date:Name?. Organization:Title: _

OCI DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

I hereby certify (or as a representative of my organization, I herebycertify) that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all relevantfacts concerning past, present or currently planned interests oractivities (financial, contractual, organizational or otherwise)which relate to the proposed work and bear on whether I have (or theorganization has) a possible conflict of Interest with respect to (1)being able to render impartial, technically sound, and objectiveassistance or advice, or (2) being given an unfair 2/ competitiveadvantage, are fully disclosed on the attached - page(s) andformatted to show:

o For ease of presentation, divide following data into four parts:Organizational, contractual, financial, other;

o The company, agency, organization in which you have a past,present, or currently planned interest or activity (financial,contractual, organizational, or otherwise);

o A brief description of relationship;

o A period of relationship;

o The extent of relationship (e.g., value of financial interest ofwork; percent of total holdings, total work, etc.).

Signature: Date:Name: Organization:Title:

2/ An unfair competitive advantage does not Include the normal flowof benefits from the performance of the contract.

Page 5 of 8

Name of Personor Organization:

OCI QUESTIONNAIRE

Contract/Proposal/RFPN DE-

1. will you (or your organization) be involved in the performance of anyportion of proposed work?

C) No.C ) Yes. The portion of the proposed work; the percentage value of the

total effort; and the type of involvement are fully disclosed on theattached pages.

2. What is (are) the major type(s) of business conducted by you (or yourorganization)? Please reply on the attached pages.

3. Do you (or your organization) have any affiliates 3/?

()No.C ) Yes. The name and a description of the major type(s) of business that

each affiliate conducts is disclosed on the attached pages.

4. Will any of the following be involved in performing the proposed work:(a) any entities owned or represented by you (or your organization); (b)your organization's Chief Executive; any of its directors; or (c) anyaffiliates 3/?

( ) No.( ) Yes. A full disclosure and discussion is given in the attached pages.

5. Are you (or your organization) an energy concern 3/?

()No.C ) Yes. A full disclosure and discussion is given on the attached pages.

6. Do you (or your organization) have a direct or Indirect relationship(financial, organizational, cotnractual, or otherwise) with any businessentity which could be affected In any way by the selection of anyparticular site for a geologic repository?

( ) No.( ) Yes. Lilst the business entity(ies) showing the nature of your

relationship and how it would be affected by the proposed work.

7. Other than Ouestion 6. above, do you (or your organization) have a director indirect relationship (financial, organizational, contractual orotherwise) with any business entity which could be affected In any way bythe proposed work?

( ) No.( ) Yes. List the business entity(ies) showing the nature of your

relationship and how It would be affected by the proposed work.

3/ See Definitions on Page 3 of S.

Page 6 of 8


OCI UESTIONNAIRE

8. What percentage of your total Income for the current and precedingfiscal years resulted from arrangements with any of the entitiesidentified in Questions 6 and 7 above?

X For the current fiscal year--lasting from / / to / /

_ For the preceding fiscal year--lasting from / / to /

9. Do you (or your organization) currently have or have you had during thepast six-(6) years any arrangements (for example, contracts andcooperative agreements) awarded, administered, or funded--wholly orpartly--by the Department of Energy or any other Federal Agency whichrelate to the proposed Statement of Work?

( ) No.( ) Yes. A full disclosure and discussion Is given on the attached pages.

10. Do you (or your organization) have or have you ever had any contracts,agreements, special clauses, or other arrangements which prohibit you(or your organization) from roposing work to be performed In thissolicitation or any portion thereof?

()No.( ) Yes. A full disclosure and discussion Is given on the attached pages.

11. Do you (or your organization) have any involvement with or interest(direct or Indirect) in technologies which are or may be subjects ofthe contracts or which may be substitutable for such technologies?

()No.( ) Yes. A full disclosure and discussion is given on the attached pages.

12. Could you (or your organization) n either your private or Governmentbusiness pursuits utilize Information acquired in the performance ofthe proposed work; such as:

(a) Data generated under the contract?(b) Information concerning DOE plans and programs?(c) Confidential and proprietary data of others?

()No.( ) Yes. A full disclosure and discussion is given on the attached pages.

Page 7 of 8


OCI QUESTIONNAIRE

13. Under the proposed work, will you (or your organization) evaluate orinspect your own services or products, or the services or products of anyother entity that has a relationship (e.g., client, organizational,financial, or other) with you (or your organization)? This could Includeevaluating or Inspecting a competitor's goods and services.

()No.( ) Yes. A full disclosure and discussion Is given on the attached pages.

14. To avoid what you perceive as a possible organizational conflict ofInterest do you (or your organization) propose to: exclude portions ofthe proposed work; employ special clauses; or take other measures?

( ) No.( ) Yes. A full discussion is given on the attached pages.( ) No possibility of an organizational conflict of interest is perceived.

This answer is briefly justified on the attached pages.

15. Please fully discuss In what manner you would propose to mitigate anyconflict of interest which may exist If awarded a contract.

16. was the Information used in the preparation of your proposal in responseto this RFP based In whole or in part on any Information developed undera DOE contract with Special Contract Clause DEAR 952.209-72 (or DOE PR9-1.5408-2) which has not been released or otherwise made available tothe public for at least six months, or which has not been available undera contract expired for at least six months, whichever Is first (exceptfor information In the Reading Rooms for this RFP)?

( ) No.( ) Yes. A full disclosure and discussion is given In the attached pages.

17. All offerors who were DOE contractors or subcontractors during the periodof proposal preparation shall fully discuss the manner by which theyavoided conflicts in the preparation of their proposal (e.g. separationof personnel working under existing DOE contracts and subcontracts in anyinterval(s) during which they contributed to proposal preparationactivities, controls on communications between proposal preparationpersonnel and personnel performing under existing DOE contracts andsubcontracts, etc.).

( ) Not applicable, not a DOE prime or subcontractor.( ) A full discussion Is given In the attached pages.

Page 8 of 8


OCI OUESTIONNAIRE

I hereby certify that I have the authority to represent my organization,If applicable, and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, thefacts and representations presented on the three pages of thisquestionnaire and on the pages of the attachment to it are accurateand complete.

Signature: Date:

Name: Organization:

Title: _

READING ROOM INVENTORY LISTING

OCRWM NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT

SYSTEM

NOTE: AT THE LEFT OF EACH DOCUMENT IN THE INVENTORY L I TING THERE IS ANALPHABET CODE. THE ALPHABET CODE CORRESPONDS TO A PROGRAM AREA OFINFORMATION TO WHICH THE DOCUMENT LARGELY PERTAINS.

THE CODES AND CORRESPONDING PROGRAM AREAS ARE LISTED BELOW:

CODE PROGRAM AREA

A LAWS/REGULATIONSB PROGRAM DIRECTIONC SYSTEMSD WASTE PACKAGEE SITEF REPOSITORYG REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONALH EXPLORATORY SHAFTI LAND ACQUISITIONJ PROJECT MANAGEMENTK BUSINESS DATA

NOTE: AT THE RIGHT OF EACH DOCUMENT TITLE IN THE INVENTORY LISTING ARETHE CODE NUMBERS OF THE MICROFICHE THAT CONTAIN THE DOCUMENT.

IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE LAST PAGE OF THE INVENTORY LISTING OFDOCUMENTS, YOU WILL FIND.:

O ADDRESSES AND POINTS OF CONTACT FOR THE DOE READING ROOMS.

O INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE USE OF THE READING ROOM FACILITY AT THE SERIAREA OFFICE AND DIRECTIONAL MAPS TO THE FACILITY.

0 INFORMATION REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF THE MICROFICHE DATA PACKAGE.

Program Area Fiche #

E Nuclear Waste Policy Act (Section 112), Environmental 1-34Assessment, Davis Canyon Site, Utah, Volumes I, IIand lll, (DOE/RW-0071) and overview May 1986(DOE/RW-0077).

E Nuclear Waste Policy Act (Section 112), Environmental 35-65Assessment, Reference Repository location, Hanfordsite, Washington, Volumes I, II and IlIl, (DOE/RW-0070)and overview, May 1986 (DOE/RW-0076).

E Nuclear Waste Policy Act (Section 112), Environmental 66-91Assessment, YUCCA Mountain site, Nevada Research andDevelopment Area, Nevada, Volumes I, II and IlIl(DOE/RW-0073) and overview, May 1986 (DOE/RW-0079).

E Nuclear Waste Policy Act (Section 112), Environmental 92-123Assessment, Deaf Smith County Site, Texas, Volumes I,11 and IlIl (DOE/RW-0069) and overview, May 1986(DOE/RW-0075).

E Nuclear Waste Policy Act (Section 112), Environmental 124-152Assessment, Richton Dome site, Mississippi, Volumes I,11 and IlIl (DOE/RW-0072) and overview, May 1986(DOE/RW-0078).

B Mission Plan for the Civilian Radioactive Waste 153-170Management Program, Volumes I, II and IlIl,June 1985. (DOE/RW-0005)

J U.S. DOE OCRWM Program Management System Manual, 171-172January 1986. (DOE/RW-0043)

J U.S. DOE OCRWM Program Change Control Procedure, 195May 1986. (DOE/RW-0083)

J U.S. DOE OCRWM Program Management System Implemen- 196tation Plan, May 1986. (DOE/RW-0082)

B Nuclear Waste Policy Act (Section 112), Recommen- 197dation by the Secretary of Energy of Candidate Sitesfor Site Characterization for the First Radioactive-Waste Repository, May 1986. (DOE/S-0048)

E Nuclear Waste Policy Act (Section 112), A Multi- 198-203attribute Utility Analysis of Sites Nominated forCharacterization for the First Radioactive-WasteRepository - A Decision-Aiding Methodology,May 1986. (DOE/RW-0074)

B U.S. Department of Energy, Fiscal Year 1988 204-205Congressional Request Civilian Radioactive WasteResearch and Development - Nuclear Waste Fund.

B U.S. DOE, OCRWMAnalysis of the Total System Life Cycle Cost for 206-209the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program,Volumes I, and 11, April 1986. (DOE/RW-0047)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 210Transporting Spent Nuclear Fuel: An Overview,March 1986.(DOE/RW-0065)

8 U.S. DOE OCRWM 211Transportation Business Plan, January 1986.(DOE/RW-0046)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 212-214Transportation Institution Plan, August 1986.(DOE/RW-0094)

A Public Law 97-425, January 7, 1983. 215Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.An Act - To provide for the development of reposi-tories for the disposal of high-level radioactivewaste and spent nuclear fuel, to establish a programof research, development and demonstration regardingthe disposal of high-level radioactive waste andspent nuclear fuel and for other purposes.

A 40 CFR Part 191 216Environmental Radiation Protection Standards forManagement and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel,High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes.

A 10 CFR Part 960 217Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982; General Guide-lines for the Recommendation of Sites for theNuclear Waste Repositories.

A United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 218(Rules and Regulations)Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 60, Code of FederalRegulations - Energy, January 1, 1986.

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 219Annual Report to Congress, March 1986.(DOE/RW-0004/2)

B U.S. DOE, OCRNM 220Program Management System,Program Reference Schedule Baseline, July 1986.(DOE/RW-0091)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 221-222Radioactive Waste Management System - ProjectDecision Schedule, March 1986.(DOE/RW-0067)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM Nuclear Waste Policy Act 223Nuclear Waste Fund Fee Adequacy: AnAssessment, March 1986.(DOE/RW-0020)

J U.S. DOE, OCRWM 224Quality Assurance Management Policies andRequirements, October 1985.(DOE/RW-0032)

8 U.S. DOE, OCRWM 225Annual Report to Congress, May 1985.(DOE/RW-0004/1)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 226-228Draft - Yearly Estimates and Assumptions ofthe January 1986 Total System Life Cycle CostAnalysis, October 1985.

J U.S. DOE, OCRWM 229Office of Geologic Repositories - ProgramBaseline Procedures Notebook (OGR/B-1)June 1986.(DOE/RW-0068)

G U.S. DOE, OCRWM 230-231Public Information Guidelines, June 1986.(DOE/RW-0089)

J U.S. DOE, OCRWM 232-233Office of Geologic Repositories, QualityAssurance Plan for High-Level RadioactiveWaste Repositories (OGR/B-3) August 1986.(DOE/RW-0095)

G U.S. DOE, OCRWM 234Near Term Public Information Products Program,FY 86-87, February 1986.(DOE/RW-0052)

G U.S. DOE, OCRWM 235Information Services Directory August. 1986.-(DOE/RW-0038)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 236OCRWM Safety Plan December 1986.(DOE/RW-0119)

G U.S. DOE, OCRWM 237Office of Geologic Repositories - IssuesHierarchy for a Mined Geologic DisposalSystem (OGR/B-10), September 1986.(DOE/RW-0101)

B Shipment of Radioactive Materials by the U.S. 238Department of Energy(DOE/DP-0030)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 239Overview - Nuclear Waste Policy Act.(DOE/RW-0104)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 240Draft Mission Plan Amendment, January 1987.(DOE/RW-01 28)

J U.S. DOE Order (Number DOE 1332.1A), 241-242October 15, 1985Subject: Uniform Reporting System.

I U.S. DOE Order (Number DOE 4300.1A), 243July 7, 1983Subject: Real Estate (Real Property) Management.

J U.S. DOE Order (Number DOE 5700.6B), September 23, 2441986, Subject: Quality Assurance.

B DOE News - DOE Announces Decisions on High-Level 245Waste Repository Program May 28, 1986.

B DOE News - Statement by John S. Herrington, 246Secretary of Energy - Nuclear Waste Repository,May 28, 1986.

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 247Announcement - DOE Announces Decisions onHigh-Level Waste Repository Program, May 28,1986.

B OCRWM BACKGROUNDER PUBLICATIONS: 248

Shipments of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Support ofNuclear Waste Policy Act Research and DevelopmentPrograms, November 1985.(DOE/RW-0034)

Activities to Date Related to Siting a SecondHigh-Level Waste Repository, May 1986.

Activities During the Site Characterization Phase ofthe Geologic Repository Program, September 1986.(DOE/RW-0098)

Cooperative Demonstration Projects for Spent NuclearFuel, September 1986.(DOEIRW-0099)

Studies of Alternative Methods of Radioactive WasteDisposal, September 1986.(DOE/RW-0100)

Transportation Casks for Spent Nuclear Fuel andHigh-Level Radioactive Waste, January 1987.(DOE/RW-0121)

Transportation Routing Issues Related to theShipment of High-Level Nuclear Waste, January 1987.(DOE/RW-0122)

Addressing Concerns About Water Through RepositorySiting and Design, January 1987.(DOE/RW-0123)

Shipments of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Support ofNuclear Waste Policy Act Research and DevelopmentPrograms, January 1987.(DOE/RW-0124)

Federal Agencies Involved in the Implementation ofthe Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, February 1987(DOE/RW-0127)

Activities During the Site Characterization Phase ofthe Geologic Repository Program, April 1987.(DOE/RW-0137)

Characteristics and Inventories of Nuclear Waste,April 1987.(DOE/RW-0140)

Public Participation in the Development of theTransportation Institutional Plan, April 1987.(DOE/RW-0141)

B OCRWM BULLETINS:

(DOE/RW-0113)

(DOE/RW-0114)

(DOE/RW-0115)

(DOE/RW-0116)

(DOE/RW-0117)

(DOE/RW-0118)

(DOE/RW/0130)

249

October 1986

November 1986

December 1986

January 1987

February 1987

March 1987

April 1987

B Memorandum of understanding between the U.S. 250Department of Energy and the U.S. Department ofLabor, December 23, 1986, purpose: the inspectionof OCRWM operations to determine compliance with.the Federal Mine.Safety and Health Act of 1977 (MSHA)and.the furnishing of MSHA technical assistance withrespect-to mine geology, underground constructionand the promotion of health and safety.

G Agreement between the DOE Office of Geologic Reposi- 251tories Projects (BWIP, NNWSI, SRP, CRP) and theNuclear Regulatory Commission's Division of WasteManagement during the site investigation andcharacterization programs and prior to the submittalof an application for authorization to construct arepository.

Also: Appendix I - BWIPAppendix 2 - SPROAppendix 3 - NNWSIAppendix 4 - CPOAppendix 5 - Acquisition of site-specific samples

during site investigation and sitecharacterization by NRC contractors.

Appendix 6 - Standard format for meeting reports.Appendix 7 - Agreement concerning the NRC onsite

representative (OR) for the repositoryprojects during site investigation andcharacterization.

G Federal Register (Thursday, August 25, 1983) 252Procedural Agreement between the Nuclear RegulatoryAgency and the Department of Energy, identifyingguiding principles for interface during site investi-gation and site characterization.

& Federal Register (Wednesday, February 12, 1986) 253Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, NuclearRegulatory Commission - Nuclear Waste RepositoryPrograms, Standard Operating Procedure.

C U.S. DOE, OCRWM 254Systems Engineering Management Plan, October 1985.(DOE/RW-0051)

C U.S. DOE, OCRWM 255Waste Management Systems Requirements and Descriptions(SRD), January 1986.(DOE/RW-0063)

C U.S. DOE, OCRWM 256-258Generic Requirements for a Mined Geologic DisposalSystem (OGR/B-2), June 1986.(DOE/RW-0090)

J U.S. DOE, OCRWM 259Office of Geologic Repositories Work BreakdownStructure and Dictionary - Development andEvaluation Phase (OGR/B-4), November 1984.

6 U.S. DOE, OCRWM 260-261.Annotated Outline for Site-Characterization Plans

.(OGR/B-5),. February 1985.

F U.S. DOE, OCRWM 262Annotated Outline for the SCP Conceptual DesignReport (OGR/B-6), May 1985.

C U.S. DOE, OCRWM 263Systems Engineering Management Plan for the Officeof Geologic Repositories (OGR/B-7), October 1985.

D U.S. DOE, OCRWM 264Waste Acceptance Preliminary Specifications forthe Defense Waste Processing Facility High-LevelWaste Form (OGR/B-8), December 1986.(DOE/RW-01 25)

D U.S. DOE, OCRWM. 265Waste Acceptance Preliminary Specifications forthe West Valley Demonstration Project High-LevelWaste Form (OGR/B-9).

- F Plan for the advance conceptual design of the 266-267repository and the waste package, January 1987.

G Summary of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission/DOE 268-269meeting on SCP issues hierarchy/performanceallocation Including:

o (Draft Document) - SCP Section 8.1,Rationale for the Site CharacterizationProgram.

o (Draft Document) - PerformanceAllocation Guide

o (Presentation Package) - SCP IssuesHierarchy and Performance Allocation,March 3/4, 1987.

G U.S. DOE.Document, dated June 24, 1983. Internal 270General Guidelines for Implementing the Consul-*tation and Cooperation Agreement Provisions ofSection 117 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

6 U.S. DOE OCRWM 271Internal Guidelines for Interactions with Communitiesand Local Governments, November 1985.(DOE/RW-0039)

J U.S.DOE Order 4700.1, March 6, 1987 272-276Subject: Project Management System.

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 277-289Monitored Retrievable Storage Submission toCongress, Volumes I, and lil..(DOE/RW-0035/1)

Volume I - The proposal, March 1987

Volume II - Environmental Assessment for a MonitoredRetrievable Storage Facility (February1986), and summary Insert, March 27, 1987.

Volume Ill -Monitored Retrievable Storage Program

G U.S. DOE Memorandum, May 21, 1986. 290Subject: Office of Geologic Repositories Guide-lines for Intergovernmental and Public ParticipationActivities.

G U.S. DOE Memorandum, September 21, 1984. 291Subject: Revised Internal General Guidelines onNuclear Waste Repository Program Grants.

B U.S. DOE Chicago Operations Office, Solicitation 292-297Document (Request for Proposals No. DE-RP02-86CH10290,July 21, 1986).

Title: Request for Proposal for ntegration SupportServices for the Salt Repository Project Office.

Also - Amendments to Solicitation DE-RP02-86CH10290,Numbers:

.SO01

.S002

B U.S. DOE, Chicago Operations Office, Salt Repository 298-302Protect Office, Solicitation Document (Request forProposals No. DE-RP02-86CH10285, dated July 21, 1986)

Title: Field and Technical Services Salt RepositorySite Characterization DEAF Smith County, Texas.

Also - Amendments to Solicitation DE-RP02-86CH10285,Numbers:

.S0015S002.S003.S004

H Proposed changes to the Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage 303Investigations Project Exploratory Shaft Facility:.

Background paper for the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission and the State of Nevada Agency forNuclear Projects Nuclear Waste Project Office,March 1987.

J An.American National Standard. Quality Assurance 304Program Requirements for-Nuclear Facilities

; (ANSI/ASME NA-1-1986 edition).

-J U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Review Plan: 305Quality Assurance Programs for Site Characterizationof High Level Nuclear Waste Repositories, June 1984.

G Department of Energy Solicitation Document Number 306-308DE-RPO1-87RW0084. Title: Design and Implementationof a Licensing Support System.

6 U.S. DOE Order 5440.IC, April , 1985, subject: 309National Environmental Policy Act.

K Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 17, 310Subpart 17.6- Management and Operating Contracts.

K Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) 311Part 909, Subpart 909.5 - Organization Conflicts ofInterest.

K Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) 312Part 970, Entitled DOE Management and OperatingContracts.

J U.S. DOE, Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, 313Nevada: Nevada Nuclear Waste storage Investigations(NNWSI) Project Plan (NVO-196-41), February 1986.

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 3i4The Illustrated Mechanics of Nuclear Waste Disposal.(DOEIRW-0105)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 315What Will A Nuclear Waste Repository Look Like?(DOE/RW-O106)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 316What Is Nuclear Waste?(DOE/RW-0107)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 317What Is Spent Nuclear Fuel?(DOE/RW-0108)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 318Can Nuclear Waste Be Transported Safely?(DOE/RW-0109)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 319Radiation nd Nuclear Waste - How Are They Related?(DOE/RW-0110)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 320How Much High-Level Nuclear Waste Is There?(DOE/RW-O11l)

B U.S. DOE OCRWM 321What Rock Types Are Being Considered For NuclearWaste Repositories And Why?(DOE/RW-0112)

B U.S. DOE, CRWM 322Briefing on the Draft Area Recommendation Reportfor the U.S. Congress, January 16, 1986.

F U.S. DOE, OCRWM 323Control of Excavated Salt, DEAF Smith County,Texas.

A U. S. DOE, OCRWM 324Implementation of the Nuclear Waste Policy Actof 1982.(DOE/RW-0062)

B U.S. DOE, Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, 325Office of Remedial Action and Waste TechnologyProgram Summary, November, 1986.(DOE/NE-0075)

F U.S. DOE, OCRWM 326Shaft Construction and Sealing, DEAF SmithCounty, Texas.

B U.S. DOE, Richland Operations Office. 327Spent Fuel Storage Requirements, October1985. DOE/RL-85-2UC-85

B U.S. DOE, Transportation Management Division. 328Transporting Uranium Hexafluorlde.

B U.S. DOE, Transportation and Waste Systems Division 329Spent Fuel Transportation.

B U.S. DOE, Transportation Management Division 330Radioactive Material Shipping Regulations.

B U.S. DOE, 0CRWM 331Managing the Nation's Nuclear Waste.(DOE/RW-0036)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWMGeologic Repository Program and Studies in Texas.

B DOE News, January 16, 1986Title: Department of Energy Issues Draft AreaRecommendation Report.

F U.S. DOE, OCRWMQuestions and Answers About the Potential Effectsof.a Repository on the Ogallala Aquifer.

K Acquisitions Regulations Handbook SourceEvaluation Board (May 1984-reprinted February 1986).(DOEIMA-0154)

E U.S. DOE, OCRWMDraft - Site Characterization Plan-Yucca MountainSite, Nevada Research and Development Area, Nevada,January 15, 1987.

332

333

334

335

336-360

Chapter IChapter 2Chapter 3Chapter 4Chapter 5Chapter 6Chapter 7

- Geology- Geoengineering- Hydrology- Geochemistry- Climatology and Meteorology- Conceptual Design of a Repository- Waste Package

E U.S. DOE, OCRWMDraft - Site CharacterizationWashington, January 15, 1987.Isolation Project (WIP)

361-396Plan - Hanford,Basalt Waste

Chapter 1Chapter 2Chapter 3Chapter 4Chapter 5Chapter 6Chapter 7

- Geology- Geoengineering- Hydrology- Geochemistry- Climatology and Meteorology- Conceptual Design of a Repository- Waste Package

A Code of Federal Regulations title 10 - Energy:Part 2 - Rules of Practice for DomesticLicensing Proceedings.Part 20 - Standards for Protection AgainstRadiation.Part 50 - Domestic Licensing of Productionand Utilization Facilities.Part.72 - Licensing Requirements for the Storageof Spent Fuel In an Independent Spent FuelStorage Installation (ISFSI).Part 100-Reactor Site Criteria.

397-402

A Code of Federal Regulations Title 30 - Mineral Resources:Part 57 - Safety and Health standards -Underground Metal and Non-metal Mines.

403

A Code of Federal Regulations Title 40- Protectionof Environment:

Part 1500 - Purpose, Policy and Mandate.Part 1501 - NEPA and Agency Planning.Part 1502 - Environmental-impact Statement.Part 1503 - Commenting.Part 1504 - Predecision Referrals to the Council-of

-Proposed Federal Actions Determined to beEnvironmentally Unsatisfactory.

.Part.1505 NEPA and.Agency Decisionmaking.Part 1506 Other Requirements of NEPA.Part 1507 Agency Compliance.Part 1508 Terminology and Index.

404

6 U.S. DOE, OCRWMSiting, Licensing and Quality Assurance DivisionAnnotated Table of Contents for EnvironmentalRegulatory Compliance Plans, November 28, 1986.

C U.S. DOE, OCRWMSiting, Licensing and Quality Assurance DivisionAnnotated Table of Contents for EnvironmentalMonitoring and Mitigation Plan, August 1986.

B U.S. DOE, OCRWMOCRWM INFOLINK - An Electronic Bulletin Board,December 1985.(DOE/RW-0041)

A Public Law 91-190National Environment Policy Act of 1969.

405

406

407

408

G Engineering BranchDivision of Waste ManagementU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionGeneric Technical Position:Waste Package Reliability AnalysisNuclear Waste Repositories.December 1985

409

for High Level

C Engineering BranchDivision of Waste ManagementU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionGeneric Technical Position:Borehole and Shaft Sealing of High Level NuclearWaste Repositories.February 1986

410

6 Engineering BranchDivision of Waste Management

SOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionGeneric Technical Position:In SITU TestingDuring Site Characterization for High LevelNuclear Waste Repositories.

411

6 Engineering Branch 412Division of Waste ManagementU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionGeneric Technical Position:Design. Information Needs in the SiteCharacterization Plan.December 1985

G U.S. Nuclear Regulatory.Commission 413Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsFinal Technical Position-on Documentation of ComputerCodes for High Level Waste Management.

G U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 414Division of Waste ManagementRevised Modeling Strategy Document for High LevelWaste Performance Assessment.

6 Geochemistry Section - Geotechnical Branch 415Division of Waste ManagementU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionTechnical Position:Determination of Radlonuclide SolubilityIn Groundwater for Assessment of High Level Isolation.November 1984

G Geochemistry Section - Geothermal Branch 416Division of Waste ManagementU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionTechnical Position:Determination of Radionuclide Sorption forHigh-Level Nuclear Waste Repositories.January 1987

E Guidelines for Development of Socioeconomic Monitoring 417and Mitigation Plans.

I Federal Land Policy and Management Act. 418

A Code of Federal Regulations 419Title 10 - Energy:

Part 961 - Standard Contract for Disposal of SpentNuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste.

A U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 173Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchRegulatory Guide 4.17:

. Standard Format and Content of Site Correction Plans forHigh-Level-Waste Geologic Repositories(Revision 1, March 1987)

J U.S. DOE, OCRWM 174Draft:Information Management System Plan for Office ofCivilian Radioactive Waste Management (January 30,1987).

J -.U.S. DOE, OCRWM -175-176- Cost and.Schedule Control Systems Criteria forContract Performance Measurement. ImplementationGuide (January 1986).(DOE/MA-0203)

D U.S. DOE 177Memorandum, dated July 8, 1985Subject: Establishment of Waste Acceptance Processand Waste Acceptance Committee.

B U.S. DOE, ORWM 178International Cooperation Program (November1986).(DOE/RW-0097)

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 179Facility Operations.DOE/RW-0048

B U.S. DOE, OCRWM 180Crystallne Repository Project Interactions.

K U.S. DOE, Office of the Controller. 181-194Accounting and Procedure Handbook (October 1979).(DOE/CR-OO)

F DOE Contract Number DE-AC06-80RL10000 420-446AND Modifications.Raymond Kaiser Engineers/Parsons Brinkerhoff(Work Performed for Basalt Waste IsolationProject).

H DOE.-Contract Number. DE-AC06-82RL10343 447-452AND Modifications.Morrison-Knudson Company, Inc.(Work Performed for Basalt Waste IsolationProject).

J DOE Contract Number DE-ACO6-87RL10840. 453-457MAC Technical Services Company(Work Performed for Basalt Waste Isolation Project).

C Field Work Proposal Under DOE Contract Number 458DE-ACO6-77RL01830Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest DivisionWork Package Title:

Performance Assessment Scientific Support.

D Field Work Proposal Under DOE Contract Number 459DE-ACO6-77RL01830.Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific NorthwestDivisionWork Package Title: Materials Characterization

Center.

C Basalt Waste Isolation Project System 460-461Engineering and Management Plan.

J Basalt Waste Isolation Project 462Quality Assurance Plan.

J Basalt Quality Assurance Requirements 463-465Document (BOARD).

J Basalt Waste Isolation Project 466Organization Charts, Richland, Washington.

J DOE Contract Number DE-AC01-87RW00131. 467-468KOH Systems, Inc. (Subcontractor toSmall Business Administration)Statement of Work:. OCRWM Records ManagementRequirements.

J DOE Solicitation, Number DE-RP01-87RW00120 469-470Title: Provide Technical Support Services forPlanning and Performing Quality AssuranceManagement Overview.

I,

B DOE Solicitation, Number DE-RPOI-85RW00060 471-474Statement of Work:

o Design Engineering and Systems Integration.o Facilities Siting and Licensing.

.o Management Economy and Efficiency.o. Institutional Affairs and Outreach.

*:.o Program Planning, Scheduling, and Policy.

G 'DOE Contract Number DE-AC01-87RW00072 475SRA Technologies, Inc. (Subcontractor toSmall Business Administration)Statement of Work: Support Services to Assist the

Siting Division, OCRWM, n thePlanning and Scoping of theEnvironmental Impact Statement(EIS) for the First GeologicRadioactive Waste Repository.

B DOE Contract Number DE-AC01-83NE44301 476-478AND Modifications.Roy F. Weston, Inc.

Statement of Work:o Program Analysis and Systems Engineering.o Engineering Economics.o Regulatory Interactions.o Repository Development.o Institutional Activities.

B DOE Contract Number DE-ACOS-860R21644 479Analysas Corporation (Subcontractor toSmall Business Administration)

Statement of Work: Technical Support,Analytical Studies, and Services for theOffice of the Assistant Manager for EnergyResearch and Development (AMERD). Responsiblefor Operation of the American Museum ofScience and Energy (AMSE).

B DOE Contract Number DE-ACO5-860R21605 AND 480-481Modifications/Task Orders.The E.C. Corporation (Subcontractor to Small BusinessAdministration).

Statement of Work: Support the Preparation ofthe Monitored Retrievable Storage (MRS)Proposal to be Submitted to Congress inJanuary 1986.

E DOE Contract Number DE-AC02-83CH10139. 482-484Battelle Memorial instituteStatement of Work: Research, Development and

Program Management Activitiesfor the DOE Crystalline RockProject.

C Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). 485-487Physical and Decay Characteristics of CommercialLWR Spent Fuel.(ORNL/TM-9591/Vl+RI)

C Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). 488-489Field Task Proposal/Agreements Program:DB - Nuclear Waste Fund Storage and Transpor-tation Systems. Budget Proposals, Operatingand Capital Equipment, Fiscal Year 1989.(ORNL/CF-87/110)

C Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). 490Concepts Involved in a Proposed Application ofUncertainty Analysis to the Performance Assessmentof High-Level Nuclear Waste Isolation Systems.(ORNL/TM-9955)

C Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). 491-492Flowsheets and Source Terms for Radioactive WasteProjections.(ORNL/TM-8462)

C Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). 493-500Draft-Characterlstics of Potential RepositoryWastes.(ORNL/TM-10213)

C Integrated Data Base for 1986: 501-505Spent Fuel and Radioactive WasteInventories, Projections, and Characteristics,September 1986.(DOE/RW-0006, Rev. 2)

C System Interface Document (Draft). 506Prepared for the DOE, Office of Storage andTransportations Systems, under contract numberDE-AC01-83NE44301.

J Transmittal of Program Management Information 507System-Development Plan. Prepared for the DOE,OCRWM,. Financial Management and AnalyticalServices Division, under contract numberDE-AC01-83NE44301.

e'

J U.S. DOE, OCRWM 508Monthly Report on Program Cost and Schedule,March 1987.

J Quarterly Report on Program Cost and Schedule, 509First Quarter FY 1987.

B .Integral Monitored Retrievable Storage (MRS)Facility:o. Conceptual Basis for Design. 510-517o Conceptual Design Reports.

- Volume 1 518-535(Book I) Design Description, Executive Summary.(Books II, I) Design Description.

- Volume II - Regulatory Assessment Document. 536-540- Volume III 541-554

(Books I, II) Design Drawings.- Volume IV 555-615- (Books I thru XV). Calculations.- Volume V. 616-663

(Book I). Cost Estimate Summaries.(Books II thru X). Cost Estimate.

- Volume VI 664-677(Books I, II). Design Studies

- Volume VII - Geotechnical Description Clinch 678-679River, Site, Basis for Design.

C Field Work Proposal 680Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific NorthwestLaboratory. Work Package Title: Nuclear WasteSystem Integration

B Basalt Waste Isolation Project (BWIP) 681-686Public Release System.Documents/Data Accessions List.

B Transportation Systems Engineering Management Plan 687-688(TSEMP). Prepared for the DOE Office of Storageand Transportation Systems Under Contract NumberDE-ACOi-83NE44301.

C Oakridge National Laboratory (ORNL). 689Field Task Proposal/Agreement.Title: Waste Systems Data and Development Program.

J DOE, NWTS Program Office, Chicago Operations Office. 690-693DOE Contract Number DE-AC02-83CH10140 AND Modifica-tions. Battelle Memorial institute, Contractor forthe Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation Project.National Waste Terminal Storage (NWTS) Program.

B Listing of Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation 694-695(ONWI) Deliverables

B DOE Solicitation Number DE-RP07-861E12625 AND 696-705Amendements.Titles: Development of From-Reacotr Casks.

B U.S.. DOE, Idaho Operations OPffice (Cask Systems 706-709Acquisition Program)Idaho National Engineering.Laboratory.-Program Management Plan for-the.Transporation-Systems Technology and Development Programs:

(DOE/ID-10154)

H DOE Contract Number DE-AC97-86WM46664 AND 710-711Modifications.Parsons Brinkerhoff/PB-KBB.

Work Related to: Salt ExploratoryShaft Facility Design Services.

G U.S. DOE, CRWM 712-724Site Characterization Plan.Conceptural Design Report.Working Draft.- Revision one, October 1986.Prepared as part of the conceputal design of a-high-level nuclear.waste repository in salt.-employing vertical..emplacement of wastepackages,. under DOE contract~ numberDE-AC02-83WM46656.

Documents include:o Executive Summaryo Volume Io Volume II

J U.S. DOE, OCRWM 725Basalt Waste Isolation Project.Project aster Schedule,Rockwell Hanford Operations.

i U.S. DOE, OCRWM 726-728Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage InvestigationsProject.Quality Assurance Plan.(NVO-196-17, Revision 5)

J Office of Geological Repositories 729Organization Charts

J U.S. DOE, OCRWII 730Lead Responsibilities by WBS Element

B Nevada Operations OfficeStatement of Work under DOE Contract Number 731DE-RPO8-86NV10576.Contractor: Science Applications International,Inc.

B Nevada Operations Office 732Statement of Work under Contract NumberDE-AC08-84NV10327Contractor: Reynolds Electrical andEngineering Co., Inc.

B Nevada Operations Office 733Statement of Work under Contract NumberDE-ACOS-84NV10322.

* Contractor: Fennix and Scission, Inc.

B . Nevada.Operations Office 734Statement of Work under Contract NumberDE-ACO8-86NV10471.Contractor Holmes and Narver, Inc.

F Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations 735-778Project Site Characterization PlanConceptual Design Reports, Volumes I thru 11.(SAND84-2641)Work performed by Sandia National Laboratoriesunder contract number DE-AC04-76DP00789.

B U.S.'DOE, Nevada Operations Office 779..Interagency Agreement Number DE-AI08-78ET44802with U.S.. Department of Interior, GeologicalSurvey

PURPOSE: To conduct Geologic, Geographical,Hydrologic, SeismologicalInvestigation in the Support ofDOE's Waste Management Activities.

D U.S. DOE, Nevada Operations Office See #730Waste Package Design and Development(W-7405-ENG-48)Operation of Lawrence LivermoreNational Laboratory.

E U.S. DOE, Nevada Operations Office See #730Geochemistry, Radionuclide Migration, andIn-situ Testing(W-7405-ENG-36)Management and Operation of Los AlamosNational Scientific Laboratory.

B Bibliography of studies for the Salt Repository 780-783Project Office of the Civilian RadioactiveWaste Management Program, April 1978-May 1986.(DOEICH/10140-05(86))

A 10 CFR, Part 71 - Packaging and Transportation 784of Radioactive Material.

K Organizational Conflicts of Interest Guidelines 785for the Systems Engineering, Development, andManagement Contractor for the OCRWM NuclearWaste Management System.

<.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYFOIA PUBLIC READING ZOOMS*

1. INEL Technical Library(Brent Jacobsen)EG&G Idaho, Inc.1776 Science Center DriveP.O. Box 1625Idaho Falls, ID 83401FTS 583-1144 Comm. (208)526-1144

2. Richland Operations Office(Terri Traub)U.S. Department of Energy825 Jadwin AvenueP.O. Box 800Richland, WA 99352FTS 444-8583 Comm. (509) 376-8583

3. Oak Ridge Operations Office(Regina Sanders)U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Chief CounselP.O. Box EOak Ridge, TN 37831FTS 626-1216 Comm. (615) 576-1216

4. DOE Headquarters (Forrestal Bldg.)**'1000 Independence Avenue, SWRoom IE190, A-232.1Washington, D.C. 20585(202) 586-6020

5. Chicago Operations Office(Mary Ann Roark)U.S. Department of Energy9800 South Cass AvenueArgonne, IL 60439FTS 972-2010 Comm. (312) 972-2010

6. Boston Support Office(Peter Pal ca)U.S. Department of EnergyLegal Office10 Causeway Street, Room 1157Boston, MA 02222-1035FTS 835-7700 Comm. (615) 565-7700

7. Savannah River Operations Office(James Gaver)U.S. Department of EnergyUniversity of SC-AikenGregg-Cranitevilile Library171 University ParkwayAiken, SC 29801FTS 239-2889 Comm. (803) 725-2889

8. San Francisco Operations Office**(Norma DelGaudio)U.S. Department of Energy1333 BroadwayOakland, CA 94612FTS 536-4428 Comm. (415) 273-4428

9. Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center(James Wiggins)U.S. Department of EnergyP.O. Box 10940Pittsburgh, PA 15236FTS 723-5914 Comm. (412) 675-5914-

10. Southeastern Power Administration(Lee Rampey)U.S. Department of EnergyLegal LibrarySamuel Elbert BuildingElberton, GA 30635FTS 283-9923 Comm. (404) 283-9923

11. Albuquerque Operations Office(Loretta Helling)U.S. Department of EnergyNational Atomic MuseumP.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, NM 87115FTS 844-4378 Comm. (505) 884-4378

12. Morgantown Energy Technology Center(Elaine Pasini)U.S. Department of EnergyLibraryP.O. Box 890Morgantown, WV 26505

* All 12 FOIA Reading Rooms listed contain microfiche machine-readable copies of theOCRWM Nuclear Waste Management System Materials.

** The two FOIA Reading Rooms, In addition to the SERI Area Office identified on theattached page, designated with double asterisks (**) contain reproducible hardcopies of the OCRWM materials In addition to the microfiche format.

V

Department of EnergySERIArea Office

1617 Cole BoulevardGolden, Colorado 80401

NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT

PUBLIC READING ROOMlocated

atDENVER EST OFFICE PARK

BUILDING 153rd FLOOR

SOLAR ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE(303) 231-1378

Upon arrival at Building 15, you will be asked to sign in at the ReceptionistDesk. You will be given a SERI visitor badge, and the receptionist will callJoyce House (x1378) or Cidney Wiechert (x1374) of the DOE/SERI Area Office fornotification of arrival and directions to the Reading Room.

Reading Room hours are Monday - Friday, 8:00 am. to 5:00 pm. There is a xeroxmachine available for use at the cost of $.10 per copy. Also, there is amicrofiche reader located on the 1st floor in the SERI Library. Please askfor further help if the reader is required. A telephone is available to makelocal calls if necessary.

.

Located in Denver West Office Park.13600 West Colfax (U.S. 40)

SERI offices are located in Buildings 16, 16 and 17 atthe north end of the Cole Boulevard loop. They areIdentified by small signs at ground level.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYSERI AREA OFFICE1617 COLE BOULEVARDGOLDEN, COLORADO 80401BUILDING 15, 3rd FLOOR

N

From West Colfax Avenue, enter the Denver WestOffice Park at Cole Boulevard. There Is a stop lightatthe intersection.

From Interstate 70. take Exit 263 to Denver WestBoulevard. Turn left, traveling southwest towardWest Colfax Avenue. At the stop sign turn left atCole Boulevard (the southwest end of the loop)and follow the road to the upper end of the loopto Buildings 15, 16 and 17.

Welcome to SERIDenver

Field ExperimentTest Site

Denver WestOffice Park

I a

Comprl Hol1IEJ

READING ROOM INVENTORY LISTING (MICROFICHE)

THE PROCUREMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF MICROFICHE DATA PACKAGESWILL BE MANAGED BY THE DOE HEADQUARTERS PUBLIC READING ROOMFACILITY.

TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE PURCHASE AND DELIVERY OFMICROFICHE DATA PACKAGES, PLEASE CALL (202) 586-6020.

Department of EnergyWashington, DC 20585

June 3, 1987

INFORMATION LETTER

Subject: Draft Statement of Work for the Systems Engineering, Development andManagement Contractor for the Nuclear Waste Management System,Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, DOE Request forProposal (RFP) No. DE-RP0l-87RW00134

To: Potential Offerors/Respondents

The Department of Energy (DOE) plans to issue a competitive solicitation for theacquisition of a Systems Engineering, Development and Management Contractor forthe Nuclear Waste Management System, Office of Civilian Radioactive WasteManagement (OCRWM). It Is anticipated that this requirement will result in acost-plus-award-fee Management and Operating contract with Letter of Creditfinancing provisions. The projected period of performance may include an initial10-year term, with potential 5-year extensions thereafter.

The DOE wishes to attract industry's highest level of technical and managerialexpertise through competition to satisfy this critical requirement. Due to thecomplex and multifaceted nature of this requirement, the Department Is Invitingpublic comments on the enclosed Draft Statement of Work. Those wishing to submitwritten comments should send them to the following address:

U.S. Department of EnergyATTN: Document Control Specialist, DE-RPOI-87RW00134Office of Procurement OperationsP.O. Box 2500Washington, D.C. 20013

All comments must be received no later than June 23, 1987, in order for theDepartment to take them into its consideration prior to solicitation release.

Finally, all interested parties are nvited to attend the Presollcitation Conferencefor this requirement scheduled on Tuesday, June 16, 1987, at the Department ofCommerce Main Auditorium, Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th Street &Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. Registration will begin at &00 am.,and the Conference will be conducted from 9:00 am. until 12:30 p.m. (local time).

-2-

In conclusion, the objectives of the Department of Energy are to encourage thehighest level of competition and select the best qualified contractor with therequisite technical, business, and financial expertise to assume systems engineering,development, and management responsibilities for the Office of CivilianRadioactive Waste Management's Nuclear Waste Management System. DOE looksforward to a strong response from industry on this solicitation.

Aeta geanProcurement MemberSource Evaluation Board

Enclosure

11+;

I ,

.II

eD R A F T

STATEMET OF blORK . .. l

FOR THE

U. S. DEPARITEU1T OF ENERGY

OFFICE OF CIVILIA RMDIOACTIVE ASTE MAUAG£E11T

SYSTE EGINEERING, DEVELOPIVET, & MAGGENT CONTRACTOR

FOR THE NUCLEAR xASTE IG!IE T SYSTEM

June 3, 1987

D R A F T

I \

STATEMENT OF WORK

CONITEtNTS

I. INTRODUCTIOIN

A. PROGRAM SUMARY

B. WORKSCOPE SUt-1ARY

C. STATEIENT OF WORK ORGANIZATION

II. PROGRAMI11ANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATION, AND SCHEDULE

A. PROGRAM M1ANSAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIOI

1. Program Management Plans And Procedur2s2. Program Organizational Responsibilities

a. Department of Energy - Headquartersb. Systems Engineering, Development, and rianagenent

Contractorc. First Repository Project Officesd. rIonitored Retrievable Storage Project Officee. Other DOE Operations Officesf. Contractors Performing Other OCRI-II orkscope

B. PROGRAM SCHEDULE

III. DESCRXPTION OF WORK

A. ITRODUCTION

B. OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMIENT PROGRAMIORK REAKDOWI STRUCTURE

C. U1ORKSCOPE DESCRIPTIOl BY WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE ELENE1T

l. Mined Geologic Disposal System

a. First Repositoryb. Second Repository

2. Federal Interim Storage3. Monitored Retrievable Storage4. Transportation5. Research and Development6. Program lanagenent

i

IV. 11AIIAGEiiENT CONITROL SYSTEM

A. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

B. PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM

1. Project Management Functions2. Project Mnagement System Requirements3. Project Management Plan

C. TECHNICAL CONTROL SYSTEM

1. Systeis Engineering Management Plan2. Work Plans

D. QUALITY ASSURANCE

1. Quality Assurance Functions2. Quality Assuranca Requirements3. Quality Assurance Plan

E. MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM PROCEDURES

V. TRANSITION PERIOD

A. SUiMMARY OF TRANSITION PERIOD

B. TRANSITION PLAN

C. AUTHORIZATION TO PERFORMI TECHNICAL WORK

D. TRANSITION OF WORK TO THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, DEVELOP1.IENT, ANDMANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR

1. Status Of Existing Contracts2. Transition Of Work To The Systems Engineering, Developnent, And

Management Contractor

E. TRANSITION OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, DEVELOPMENT, AD MAIIAGENENTCONTRACTOR WORK TO MRS CONTRACTOR

APPENDICES

A. ACRONYMS

B. REFERENCES

C. MAJOR DELIVERABLES

ii

I. INTRODUCTIOJ

A. PROGRAM SU1 ARY

The Department of Energy (DOE), through its Office of Civilian RadioactiveWaste Management OCRWMl), is responsible for implementing the Nuclear Wa.stePolicy Act (IIUPA) of 1982 (Public Law 97-425). This responsibility includesthe development of a nuclear Waste Management System for the ultimate disposalof hlgh-level radioactive waste and spent fuel in a manner that is.environmentally acceptable and protects the public health and safety. ThisNuclear Waste rianagement System includes the geologic repositories,transportation systems, and pro-emplacement (e.g., spent fuel rodconsolidation), packaging and storage capabilities that nay be rquired.

B. UORKSCOPE SUIlARY

This Statement of Work (SOW) has been prepared for the Systems Engineering,Development, and tianagement (SEDfl) contract for the uclear Waste fanagenentSystem. The SED11 Contractor (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor") isresponsible for design and analysis of the Iuclear aste i1anag92m.nt S/sta toensure that the system is optimized and that the interfaces between tl systemielements are clearly specified and controlled, including transportationconsiderations. The Contractor is also assigned specific responsibilities toensure that the first repository candidate sites are characterized and thatthe selected site is engineered and developed through receipt of an RCConstruction Authorization. The Contractor will provide the strategy options,leadership, and resources to assist DOE in obtaining the uclear RegulatoryCommission RIC) licenses. Beyond receipt of the Construction Authorizationfor tho repository, the Contractor is required to prfoni Title III Design ncInspection and to support DOE and the selected repository operator inobtaining the license to operate the first repository and in preparing foracceptance testing and operations. A primary aspect of the Contractor'sresponsibilities is to ensure that all work is conducted in a structured andsystematic manner that meets the technical, schedule, cost, safety,environmental, quality and interface requirements and that it eets theregulatory requirements of the RC and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The Contractor is assigned responsibilities for the second repository in areassuch as integrating second repository requirements with the other elements ofthe fluclear Waste lanagenent System and assisting second repository programparticipants to comply with the 11WPA and ensure techniques, strategy options,design concepts, and plans developed for the first repository are utilizedwhere appropriate and that lessons learned on the first respository areincorporated into second repository planning and ir.plenentation.

Should DOE receive Congressional approval for the construction of i :onitorsd

Retrievale Storage (MRS) facility as part of the fuclear Waste anagementSystem, the Contractor will be required to provide design an licensingservices for the fIRS. The Contractor will provide the design and lic-nsingservices unless and until OOE makes a decision to transfer detailed design,construction, and operation of the MRS to a separate requirement to becompeted. The Contractor would be required to assist in the transition of thatworkscope to the other contractor. In any event, the Contractor ill continueto retain the integration function of the MRS into the overall Nuclear WasteManagement System.

The Contractor's responsibilities include integrating the work of variousprogram participants, such as national laboratories, other Federal agencies,and OOE prime contractors conducting ork in support of the program. Animportant aspect of the Contractor!s activities is assisting 0E in itsInteraction with affected States and Indian Tribes to'ensure that tleconsultation and cooperation required by te Act for its successfulkiplamentation is achieved. All responsibilities assigned to te ContraCtorare subject to program authorization and technical direction by OCP'.Ifl.

C. STATENEfJT OF W1ORX< ORGAflIZATIO:J

Following Statement of Work Section I, Introduction, are four additionalSections and three Appendices:

o Section II provides background information on anagenent of the OCRPI1iProgram, including anticipated organizational roles when the Contractoris performing OCRWJI work. Also included in Section II is an ovorvi.>;of the OCR1t4 Program schedule.

o Section I describes workscope to be performed by the Contractor iththe exception of workscope related to management control systenfunctions. The description of workscope in this section is organizedunder the OCRWM1 Work Breakdown Structure CUBS).

o Section IV describes functions and requirements of anagen2nt :ontro1systems for the SEDM Contract.

o Section V describes activities during the transition phase when theContractor is required to prepare for initiation of contract worcscope.Section V also outlines the requirements and process for receipt of DOEauthorization to begin technical workscope.

o Appendix A contains acronyms used in this Statement of Work.

o Appendix B identifies the references cited in this Staterient of Work.Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to Reference' herein referto Appendix .

2

o Appendix C contains a listing of najor dlivera51es to b coripleted

the Contractor.

i

.

('3

II. PROCRAM) IlANIAGE&lEIT, ORGArUZATIOfl, AID SCHEDULE

This Section provides background information on management of the OCRW11Program, including anticipated organizational roles in relation to theContractor performing OCRW1M work. Also included in this Section is anoverview of te Program schedule.

A. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION

The Program anagent System Manual (Reference 1) describes the overallpolicies and systems for managing the OCRW11 Program. In addition to theProgra ilanagement Systen Manual, the Contractor will be required to ConPlywith applicable DOE Orders and management policies and procedures.

1. Program (Tanager.ient Plans and Procedures

Based on the Program anagement System Manual and DOE Orders, OCRUE iasdeveloped implementing plans ad procedures for management of OCRW;iProgram activities. The key DOE Orders and OCRIMl documents necessary frdevelopment of the Contractor management control system are referenced inthis SOW. The OCRWM management control system requires preparation of3aselines and control of work in accordance with aselines. Parts of ti:eOCRW1 nanagement system related to licensing contain a feature tatquality-affecting work must be conducted n accordance with approvedprocedures by qualified and trained personnel and must be properlydocumented. The term quality-affecting refers in general to the qualityof items important to safety or important to waste isolation.

It is anticipated that the OCRWI Program Management System MIanual and someof the referenced OCRUIl documents will be updated by DOE to reflect thenew program organization as the Contractor begins work.

2. Program Organizational Responsibilities

Appendix A of the Program Management System Manual lists the overallprogram organizational responsibilities for the DOE-Headquarters (HQ)OCRWM Offices, DOE Operations Offices and Project Offices, and other DOEOffices that support OCRI1l. Although Appendix A of the Program ManagenentSystem Manual as currently written does not reflect the decision toutilize a SEDM Contractor, it is useful in understanding total programorganizational interactions.

The following subsections summarize the anticipated Program organizationalresponsibilities which will exist when the Contractor begins work. Itshould be noted that the following subsections are not intended tosummarize responsibilities to perform program workscope as theseresponsibilities are defined elsewhere in this SOW. The followingsubsections are generally focused on interactions between organizationsand are included in the SOW in order to provide a more comprehensive

U4

understanding of te extent of capabilities required to perforn workscopain this contract. Figures III. and 11.2 illustrate the current rogranorganization and the planned organization with the Contractor in place.

a. DOE-HQ Organizational Rsponsibilities

DOE-HQ will continue to perform the management functions described inAppendix A of the Program Management System Manual and will also beassigned responsibility for, managing the Contractor. Sone of theDOE-HQ staff will be assigned to work closely with the Contractor and itis anticipated that they will be co-located with the Contractor.

As a minimum, DOE-HQ is anticipated to have the followingresponsibilities:

1) Ensure that the requirements of the Ul!PA are net.

2) Manage SEW contract and other DOE-I1Q prime contractors.

3) Establish overall Progran requirements including those for proj.tmanagement, technical control, quality control, licensing, andinstitutional activities. Approve implementing plans prepared yProgram participants and conduct reviews, audits, surveillances, andassessments to ensure Program participant compliance withrequirements.

4) Approve cost, schedule, and technical baselines and changes propose.by the Contractor and other Program participants.

5) Assign workscope and provide budget baseline guidance and directionto all Program participants.

6) As licensee for repositories and MIRS if approved, subnit licenseapplications to NRC and provide overall assurance that licensingrequirements are et.

7) Serve as point of contact with Congress, UIRC, and other Federalagencies.

b. SEDr Contractor Organizational Responsibilities

Perform work as assigned by this SOW and DOE-HQ direction. As a mininum,it is expected that the Contractor will establish an office to conductwork in the Wasbington D.C. metropolitan area, and site offices at each ofthe three candidate first repository sites, in addition to any centralwork office the Contractor would utilize that is not located at one ofthose four locations. If the MRS is authorized by Congress, and theContractor provides RS design and licensing services, it is expected thatthe Contractor will establish a site office at the IRS site.

In doing so, the Contractor Is required to interact with other Progranparticipants as follows:

(; 5

FIGURE 11 1CURRENT PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

- FIRST REPOSITORY -

::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :-, Jo :',' ' ......... , .'t.iAdiso ~ ~ Ri

,S . .

QF~~IC~~S TECUUN L

PROM"T ~ O~90 ~~~~~~~~~~~~OFFICM

I j II

RWS 1630T.04

FIGURE 11.2PLANNED PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

- FIRST REPOSITORY -. I

DOE

HO

- ocm

, . . fo ".

.. SPPC SERVICESCONTRACTORS

rmmmmmm_~~~~ *

Imm I . '| a

OPERATKISOFFICES

OFFICES imm-

CONTRlACTOPRPERFORMANCE'

' ePO{DifORY

WASTE PACKAGE

DESGN :,,V

I0-J

-

IWITINBASELINE

OUTSIDEBASEUNE

IUI

F- - U

I I I-

.'NATMOAL

LABORTOESAND OTHER

FEDR.AGEWES

CONACTORS

FIELDTESTING

EXPWATOMSHAFTDESIGN

CONTRACTOR

EXPLORAmTOR. SHAFT

CONSTRUCTIONCONTRACTORS

TECHN1CAL,SCREDULE, AND MMDET

1) Contractually and technically report to DOE-FIQ.

2) Consist2nt with DOE-approved baselines and as required to coaductwork or execute assigned responsibilities, provide technical, schedule,and budget direction to contractors performing work on the firstrepository. Direction (within established baselines) will be providedto contractors, and the SEDM site offices, with parallel informationprovided to the DOE Project Offices with the exception of directionprovided to DOE national laboratories or other Federal agencies, whichmust pass through the Project Office to the national laboratory or otnerFederal agency. Direction proposed by the Contractor that is outside ofthe established baseline requires OCRWfl approval of a baselinechange prior to iplementation. Submit first repository deliverablesrequired by tnis SOW and DOE-HQ direction to DOE-HQ.

3) For MS Projact orkscope, submit deliverables to and iio leilentdirection transmitted by te DOE RS Project Office.

4) For uclear Waste lianageraent System design and initegration, sui.itdeliveraDles to DOE-HQ and implement DOE-HQ direction. Request inputfrom program participants in performing uclear Waste System studies andevaluations. Coordinate recommended changes to the OCRW1 fluclear M.asseManagement System baseline and interfaces with all potentially affectedprogram participants. Ensure that all program participants are promptlynotified of all changes to the baseline and interfaces and are :orkingto the approved baseline and interfaces.

5) For transportation-related workscope, implement direction fronDOE-HQ and submit evaluations and studies to them for approval.Coordinate evaluations of proposed transportation baseline changes withthe appropriate organizations responsible for transportationsubelements. Ensure that all organizations with transportationinterfaces or rsponsibilities are promptly notified of all canqe's tothe baseline and are working to the approved baseline.

6) In support of DOE-HQ, conduct quality assurance rviews, assessments,audits, and surveillances of participants in order to ensure that otherProgram contractor deliverables are adequate. Recommendations by theContractor regarding the need for corrective action in the work of othercontractors must be provided for implementation to the DOE office thatmanages the contractor.

7) Provide OCR41-approved program technical and schedule baselineinformation to the second repository program participants, and other DOEfield organizations managing contractor activities that are OCU1,40Program activities but neither assumed by the Contractor nor part ofspecific project activities.

8) As directed by OE-HQ, assist DOE in interactions with RC, otherFederal agencies, affected States and Indian Tribes, and the ublic.

U

:. First Repository Project Offices Organizational R.sponslhilities

The salt, basalt, and tuff DOE Project Offices will manage activitiesremaining with existing contractors consistent with baselines aporoved yOOE-HQ. For work performed by Project Office contractors under 3Selements assigned to the Contractor, work will also be managed consistentwith technical, schedule, and budget requirements established by theContractor. Proposed budgets prepared by the first repository ProjectOffices will be submitted to DOE-HQ and will be consistent with technical,schedule, and budget direction established by the Contractor. Technical,schedule, and budget direction provided to Project Office contractors willbe reviewed by the Project Offices to ensure consistency with contracts,approved baselines, and the budget provided by DOE-HQ. The repositoryProject Offices will e required to revise their nanage:iint systemsconsistent with the new program organization and to support tnetransition of work from their contractors to the Contractor, asappropriate.

d. iURS Project Office Organizational Rsponsibilitias

If the MRS is approved by Congress, the MRS Project Office will nanageactivities consistent with baselines approved by DOE-HQ. The t:RSProject Office will establish requirements for MRS design and licensingand will provide these requirements to, the Contractor. The IRS Pr'jectOffice will continue to be responsible for MRS project managementincluding development of the overall project schedule with input fronthe Contractor.

e. Other DOE Operations Offices Organizational Responsibilities

The second repository program field organization, and the DOE fieldorganizations managing contractor activities that are not assu;ied y 1tlContractor will continue to receive budget and technical direction fromDOE-IIQ. The Contractor and these field organizations and theircontractors Will exchange oCRWM-i approved program technical and schedul1baseline information to ensure proper integration of all OCRItri progra.'activities.

f. Contractors Performing Other OCRW1 Workscope OrganizationalResponsibilities

Based on DOE-HQ direction, DOE Contracting Officers will on a case-iy-cas2basis revise workscope and responsibilities of existing contractorsperforming OCRWM workscope. The anticipated transition ofresponsibilities is summarized in Section V. There is no anticipatedchange in assignment of management of contracts fror.i one DOE offic toanother.

B. PROGRA, SCHEDULE

A Draft ission Plan Amendment (Reference 2) has een subi"ittad to States,

C"9

affected Indian Trbes, and Federal agencies for their review prior totransmittal to Congress. Te Draft Mission Plan Anendinent ontiins a sumaryreport on progress to date in the OCRIM Programr and draft milestones roposedby DOE for conducting the remainder of the Program.

The schedule for the first repository from the Draft Mission Plan Aendment isshown in Table II.1. NIote that the "current" schedule shown is a proposedrevision to the June 1985 Mission Plan and is subject to change based onCongressional feedback.

The key milestones listed on the Table were developed using input fron eachfirst repository project office. The schedule remains aggressive andsuccess-oriented. Important assumptions which if changed could impact thesemilestones are included in the Draft Mission Plan Amendment.

The key milestones for te MRS Project are shown in Table 11.2. Thisscnedule, based on the NIRS Submission to Congress (Reference ), is sno:n interms of onths after Congressional authorization.

T;ia ky ilastones for Uie Transportatina ?rogrami ar swn in Tol] 11.2.The Transportation Program schedule, ased on the Draft Mission ?lanAmendment, is designed to have an adequate operational transportation systemavailable when required to serve the Nuclear Waste anagement Systan.

TABLE 11.1

Schedule for the first repository&

Current 1985 Missionilestone schedule Plan schedule

Start of exploratory-shaft constructionTuffBasaltSalt

Start of in-situ testingTuffBasaltSalt

End of site characterization*TuffBasaltSalt

Draft environmental impactstatement

Final environmental impactstatement

Submittal of the site-selectionreport to the President

Submittal of the licenseapplication to the NuclearRegulatory Comission

Receipt of a constructionauthorization from theNuclear Regulatory Commission

Start of cons truction

Start of phase 1 operations

Start of phase 2 operations

Second quarter 1988Third quarter 1988Fourth quarter 1989

Fourth quarter 1989First quarter 1992Fourth quarter 1991

Third quarterThird quarterThird quarter

198619861987

Third quarter 1988Fourth quarter 1988Second quarter 1989

FirstFirstFirst

quarter 1992quarter 1993quarter 1993

Third quarterThird quarterThird quarter

198919891989

Fourth quarter 1993

Fourth quarter 1994

Fourth quarter 1994

First quarter 1995

First quarter 1998

First quarter 1998

First quarter 2003

Second quarter 2006

Third quarter 1990

Fourth quarter 1990

First quarter 1991

Second quarter 1991

Third quarter 1993

Third quarter 1993

First quarter 1998

First quarter 2001

aThe schedule is given in calendar-year quarters.

End of the testing-necessary for the selection of the repository site andthe preparation of the draft envirovmental impact statement.

SOURCE: Reference 2

11

TABLE II.2

MRS FACILITY PROJECT SCHEDULE

MILESTONE

Congressional approval

Start design

Complete license application design

Complete safety analysis report

Complete environmental documentation

Submit license application to NRC

Receive NRC license

Begin site preparation

Complete construction

Complete operational demonstration

*Start facility operations

Start full-scale operations

CURRENT SCHEDULE

0

7 months

26 months

27 months

29 months

30 months

59 months

59 months

110 months

123 months

123 months

138 months

*The shipment of spent fuel to the MRS is contingent uponreceipt of a Construction Authorization for the firstrepository. According to the revised first repositoryschedule in the Draft Mission Plan Amendment, such auth-orization is expected by the first quarter of 1998.

12

TABLE I.3

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SCHEDULE

MILESTONE

Award first cask developmentcontract (from-reactor cask)

Issue transportation system require-ments and description document

Issue draft comprehensive trans-portation plan

Complete management configurationstudy

Complete final cask designs

Initiate conceptual design forcask maintenance fac.ility

Issue operating plan

Cask prototypes available

Initiate acquisition of servicecontractor for operations

Begin cask fleet fabrication

Begin construction-of cask mainten-ance facility

Begin operations

CURRENT SCEEDULEa

Third quarter 1987

Fourth quarter 1987

Third quarter 1988

Third quarter 1988

Second quarter 1990

1990

1990

1994

1994

1996

1996

1998

aThe schedule is given in calendar-year quarttrs.

1.3

III. DESCRIPTION OF 1l:<RK

A. INTRODUCTION

This Section describes the workscope to be performed by the Contractor withthe exception of workscope related to management control system functions.Management control system functions and requirements are in Section IV.Specific direction will be provided by DOE.

B. OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE tIANAGEMENIT PROGRAM WORK BREAKDOWNSTRUCTURE

The-description of workscope in Section III.C is organized under tila CRW;work Breakdown Structure (S). (A ork breakdown structure is a formalizecmethod for subdividing activities into manageable segments and defining eachof these so that vork can be planned, scheduled, costed, and exacutd. Forcnore information on DOE use of work breakdown structures, se2 Reference ).For tie purpose of completeness in providing a comprehensiv2 Ges~ ri3: *DSEDIl Contract workscope, Section II.C includes the entire top level OClUiW3S. Where there is no Contractor workscope under a JBS element, SectionIII.C states that the Contractor is not responsible for that WOS lerient.

Figure III.1 shows the OCRIXM top-level WBS (Reference ). Level 0 of the UBSis the end product, which, for the Program, is the Nuclear aste NlnagenentSysten. Level 1 consists of the four systen elements as well as research anddevelopment activities and Program management. The system elements are tile(lined Geologic Disposal systen (1.0.0); Federal interim storage (2.0.0);Monitored Retrievable Storage (3.0.0) which has been proposed to Congress; andtransportation (4.0.0). Level 2, currently only used in the repositoryprogram, identifies the host rocks: basalt (1.1.0), tuff (1.2.0), salt(1.3.0), and crystalline rock (1.4.0). Note that since the May, 986 DOEannouncement to defer the second repository slting rogram, the "crystallinerocl" activity (1.4.0) is now referred to as the "repository technologydevelopment" program. Frequently in this S, a designation suzi as 1.X.02will be used where the X denotes that work for all three first rspositorycandidate sites is included.

For the repository program WBS elements, a Work Breakdown Structure Dictionary(Reference 5) was issued by the Office of Geologic Repositories (OGR) for useby all repository program participants during the repository development andevaluation phase. This WBS Dictionary defines levels three and four of tnarepository W8S.

C. WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION BY WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE ELEMENT

The Contractor has the responsibility to ensure that all work is conducted ina structured, systematic, and controlled manner that meets the regulatoryrequirements of the RC and the EPA; DOE requirements for environmental

e*muL$J L�i � L2>ISA II

e I .

AONI

Program summary work breakdown structure.FICURE 111.1

SOURCE: Reference I

*NOTE: 1.4.0 to now called "Repository Technotogy Development"

protectiol, safety, and heal th; OCi.4J,' quality recuirements; and t:Inical,schedulo, and cost aselines. The Contractor sall also assist DO inensuring tat the requirements of te Ni;UA are met.

It is anticipatad that Contractor interactions with other rograri participantswill occur as described in Section 11. Specific agreements on theseinteractions will be established in the Contractor Project MIanagement Plan,Systems Engineering Management Plan, and Quality Assurance Plan,,all of whichare approved by OE-HQ.

1. MINED GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL SYSTEM (GDS)

a. First Repository

l'orkscope described in this element of the OCRUNI WJ3S applies t all threecandidate first repository sites (Deaf Siith, Texas - salt nost roc; Yuccaiiou;itain, evada - tuff host roc'.;; and anford, !1ashington - asalt nistroc.). Where applicable, orkscope deliverables specific to any of tla2individual sites are identified on tne list of ajor contract dliverables(0apendix C).

Although DOE will be the licensee for the first repository and therefore hastile ultimate responsibility to ensure that NIRC licensing requirenents are met,the Contractor shall ensure that all deliverables prepared by the Contractorand other contractors will meet NRC licensing requirements during sitecharacterization, design through Title III, and licensing processes. TheContractor shall also provide licensing support as required to DOE and thefirst repository operating contractor in preparing for an .operating licens2.

For field-related site characterization work, such as surface-based oreholedrilling and testing, geophysical testing, rock mechanics, in-situ testing,waste package environmental testing and for field-related environmental andsocioeconomic work, the Contractor shall interact with and utilize xistinCproject contractors. The Contractor will identify plans and data ruirementsin conjunction with DOE. The project contractors ill repare iplans and procedures, enerate/collect the data, erform relinieryi anralses(i.e., ensure the quality of te data, evaluate data against dat*- rquirecrneitsand study plans, and draw preliminary conclusions), provide data reports to

tne Contractor, and provide- support as requested by the Contractor in dataiant2rpretation and performance and design analyses that utilize the data. TheContractor will utilize the data in design of the repository and inperformance analyses to reach conclusions for each of the individual sites oncomparisons to siting criteria.

The Contractor is also responsible for the conduct of other wor% tnat is notfield-related site characterization work, such as waste form tsting; wastepackage materials interaction testing; aste package design and development;repository equipment, instrumentation, and seal materials development andtesting; and repository and seals design. The Contractor shall utilize, tothe extent that it is effective and efficient, te existing cadre of Programparticipants such as te DOE national laboratories, other DOE laboratories andoperating contractors, and other Federal agencies to carry out t wor or

6

assist in performance of ork. This especially applies to testing activitiaswhere facilities, equipment, and trained staff are available or an oa adeavailable and to activities related to numerical odeling aid prforinan:analyses. In work planning, the Contractor ill consid3r xisting DOEcontractor capabilities that are or can be made available. In reviewing andapproving work plans and other planning, DOE-HIQ will have the ultimateauthority to make work assignments.

Workscope for first repository Mined Geologic Disposal System is as follows:

1.X.O100 MGDS Systems

The Contractor will be responsible for performing MGDS systems workscopeincluding:

1) Management and Integration

- Provide overall management of the systems activities incluoingplanning, scheduling, budgeting, and reporting.

- Provide for interaction and coordination with other OCRWI1 participantsin the systems area.

2) Systems Engineering

- Serve as secretary to the OGR Change Control Board (COC) (Reference )and maintain its records. Provide current system baseline information toProgram participants.

- Review the existing MGDS Generic Requirements Document (Reference 7).Provide, for DOE approval, recommendations for changes to the GenericRequirements Document as necessary to control te overall [ICOS tchni.calbaseline. Iaintain the Generic Requirements document as the overall r;GDStechnical baseline. Evaluate proposals for changes to the GenerizRequirements Document and other technical baseline documents and sunitrecommndations to the OGR Change Control Board.

- Review the existing site-specific system requirements documents andsystem description documents for each candidate repository in terns ofconsistency with the MGDS Generic Requirements, adequacy for design, andappropriate identification and control of interfaces. flake canges asnecessary and maintain the site-specific system requirements documentsand system description documents consistent with the SED SystemsEngineering Management Plan (SEfIP) (see Section IV.C.) and the GIrDSGeneric Requirements Document.

- Provide analyses of technical issues that affect the mined geologicdisposal system and other OCRWI1 system elements interfacing Smith therepository.

- Perfarrn risk assessments, systen otinization studies and analyses ofcost and schiedule ipacts. The Contractor shall ensure that adequatesysten studies addressing t rationale for program requirements andtrade off studies relative to the implementation of actions to addresstie requirements are planned, conducted and documented at tc appropriatetines to support the program schedule. Recommend actions concerningprogram costs and schedule.

- Evaluate existing models and develop new models (as needed) andestimates for the life-cycle costs of the repository system elenent.

- Develop, maintain and operate the program's Configuration ManagementSystem consistent with requirements in the SEMP. Conduct configurationaudits and develop interface controls throughout the program.

3) Tecnnical Data Base tanage-nent

- Establish (as needed) and maintain technical data base manar2rntsystems for use in evaluating waste isolation systen perfornance,including activities necessary to ensure data djcumenation, traza11ilitjand control. Provide for access to the data base system y outsidaagencies.

- Incorporate existing data into the data base management system throughassistance from each candidate repository site and incorporate new datainto the system.

4) GDS Total System Performance Assessment

- Consistent with regulatory requirements for overall waste isolation,conduct performance assessments and develop performance allocationutilizing input from waste package, site and repository performanceassessment activities. Conduct and manage pre-closur? safetyanalyses of the overall repository waste isolation system.

- Develop (as neded), verify, validate, benchnarr, and erCui2nt :sfor assessing the overall aste isolation performance. Identify andprioritize data requirements for the total prfornan:e assessment of tnerepository system element.

1.X.0200 Waste Package

The Contractor shall be responsible for developing and implementing overallstrategies and test programs, and conducting the design, analysis andperformance demonstration necessary to produce a aste package capable ofmeeting the requirements specified by the RC and that is consistent with tneNuclear Waste Management System. The activities to be performed by tinContractor include, but are not limited to, the following:


- Povide anagement of waste package activities includin! plannin:,

scheduling, budgeting, controlling, and reporting.

- Using input from each of te three candidate repository sites, provideoverall aste package planning and prepare a strategy and sciedule forwaste package activities for each site.

- Provide for interaction and coordination with other OCRItN progranparticipants on waste package activities.

- Provide technical expertise in material sciences, chemistry,engineering, and other disciplines as required to evaluate and implementthe waste package strategies of each site in meeting regulatoryrequirements. Assist DOE by obtaining consultants and outside technicalexpertise for specialized technical reviews and peer reviews.

- Provide study plans for the technical direction of participant toimplement necessary site characterization activities in te variouswaste package disciplines listed above.

2) and 3) aste Package nvironnent and aste Forrm and :ateri:ls Tstini

- Provide technical direction to each project in tems of identifyingtest data needs in the characterization of the waste package environmentunder both anticipated and unanticipated conditions.

- Evaluate adequacy of each proJect's waste package environment testplans and procedures in providing data for waste package design andlicensing analyses.

- Develop and implement test plans related to the following waste formand materials testing areas utilizing project input:

a. behavior and radionuclide release rates and mechanisms for spentfuel, commercial high-level waste, and other waste forms.

b. ehavior and corrosion ratas and corrosion -machanisms of t .aastzcontainer and its interaction with the surrounding environment.

c. behavior of packing materials and host rock.

- Implementation and evaluations of test plans shall take into accountthat existing facilities engaged in current testing or other DOEfacilities which can be made available are to be given consideration forany testing activities.

- Evaluate existing mathematical models and plans for developing newmodels required to characterize the waste form and waste packageenvironment at each site, and analyze waste package behavior.Provide recommendations to DOE on the need for development of new models,the contractor which should develop each model, and the schedule formodel development. Ensure that all mathematical models have beenbenchmarked and are documented and controlled.

- Utilizing test data, perform analyses with models or provide te:ni-aldirection to others to perfor analyses wjith odels t provice dat3 forwaste package performance assessnent.

- Provide assistance to DOE in managing the waste acceptance process(Reference 8) for high-level waste (LU). Provide recommendations forupdating existing HLW acceptance specifications and develop for DOEapproval new HLW waste acceptance specifications for future HLWproducers. Ensure such specifications reflect both repositoryrequirements as well as other OCRWI1 system requirements, such astransportation. Evaluate waste acceptance compliance plans and wastequalification reports prepared by HLW producers. Coordinate wasteacceptance issues with HLW producers.

4) Design, Fabrication, and Prototype Testing

- For each site, rview the waste package site characterization plan(SCP) conceptual design, all waste package design studies perforedsubsequent to ompletion of the SCP conceptual design, and waste : (a-system requirements documents. 3ased on reviews, identify aditiunalstudies that should be performed prior to or during Avanced ConceptualDesign and recommend changes, if necessary, to the site-specific systaoirequirements or subsystem design requirements documents.

- Maintain the waste package subsystem design requirements documentsconsistent with the site-specific system requirements cocument and the:1GDS Generic Requirements Document. Evaluate proposals to charge t2waste package subsystem design requirements documents and subiitrecommendations to the DOE Change Control Board.

- Complete the waste package container standard for design andfabrication.

- Perform aste package Advanced Conceptual Design. Subnit tie :lastepackage Advanced Conceptual Design to DOE-HQ for review and approval ainto each site for review and conent. Conduct desinn review neetings,provide proposed resolution of conents to DOE-HQ, and incorporatecoments per DOE-HQ direction.

- Perform waste package License Application Design and analyses for DO'ssubittal of the License Application. Assist DOE-HQ in resolvingcomments on the waste package portion of the License Applicatiorr.

- Consistent with the License Application, provide the design, includingdrawings and specifications, for the fabrication -of te waste package.

- Identify requirements for tests and develop plans to qualify the astepackage design. Ensure implementation of the test plans and evaluate teresulting data from tests for adequacy to meet licensing requirements.

- Provide economic analyses for waste package designs, and analyze the

impact of these designs on the total cost of the NMuclear WIast2 ManagementSystem.

- Consistent with technical rquirements for interface coitrol, ensurethat waste package interfaces have been identified and controlled.

5) Waste Package Performance Assessment

- Develop (as needed), verify, validate, benchmark, and documentcomputer codes for assessing the performance of the waste package.Identify and prioritize data required for performance assessment.

- Perform analyses that demonstrate with reasonable assurance that thewaste package and engineered barrier designs will meet the regulatoryrequirements. Ensure that data and analytical odels have beenqualified, documented, and controlled.

- Provide for peer review of analyses. Subrmit analyses to DOE for ravingand incorporation into the License Application Dsign.

- Idintify and analyze uncertainties in aste package elements as t.relate to site characterization data.

I.X.0300 Site

The Contractor is responsible for evaluating existing site investigationprograms described in the SCPs for the three candidate sites and for providingtechnical direction for future site characterization activities. 3ased n t'12issues hierarchy and issue resolution srategy, the review of the SC? shallconcentrate on the assessment of whether planned investigations will besuccessful in resolving design and performance issues for the three sitas.Special attention shall be given to designing site programs tat are adequatefor licensing the three sites nd to ensuring that such site progras arecomparable. The work in the site program shall support preparation of SC?progress reports, study plans, the environmental impact statement, licensigtopical reports, te site selection report and associated aalyses, ad t.le

License Application. The activities to be performed y tna Contractorinclude, but are not limited to, the following:

1) Management-and Integration

- Provide anagement of activities including planning, scheduling,budgeting, controlling, and reporting.

- Provide for interaction and coordination witt other OCRI641f programparticipants related to site activities.

- Provide technical expertise in the geosciences (e.g., gelogy,hydrology, seismology, geophysics, geochemistry, tectonics, climatology,and natural resource evaluation) necessary to plan and define thetechnical effort of participants in resolving design and erformanceissues in sufficient detail to meet the regulatory rquiriments.

21

- ?rovice study plans fr the tectinical direction of participants toimol-2nent necessary site characterization activities in te variousgeosCience disciplines listed above.

2) Geologic

This consists of work in fields of stratigraphy, structural geology,seismology, tectonics, geophysics, paleoclinatology, geomorphology, andnetural resource evaluation. Both local geology and the rgional cortextshall be considered. More specifically the Contractor shall:

- Define requirements and strategies for obtaining geologic field andlaboratory data to address issues identified In the SCPs. These ould Dedocumented in the SCP progress reports and/or study plans related togeologic studies. Requirements on field-testing shall e provided toproject contractors.

- Evaluate geologic data-acquisition tiods and procedures to ensureadequacy in eeting pronram requirenents. This includes supporting DOE iitle conduct of on-site audits and surveillances of field a:tiviziesiilplemented by project participants.

- Evaluate and interpret data obtained y project participants andprepare required documents.

- Integrate stratigraphic and structural data to provide neolo-i: andtectonic odels to support hydrologic activities, to support perforna.iceassessment activities, nd provide host-rock geometry information todesign. Work shall include characterization and documentation ofpotentially disruptive geologic scenarios in response to preclosure andpostclosure performance assessment needs.

3) Hydrologic

This consists of activities such as tne analysis of data fro:I puopingtests in boreholes, well logging, tracer tests; development of conceptualand numerical models of the hydrologic flow system for the site andregion; surface ater investigations; and calculations of flood potential.3oth'the unsaturated and saturated zones are to be considered as well asporous and fractured media. ore specifically, the Contractor shall:

- Define requirements and strategies for obtaining hydrologic field andlaboratory data to address issues identified in-the SCP. Thesa would bedocumented in the SCP progress reports and/or study plans related tohydrologic studies. Requirements on field-testing shall be provided toproject contractors.

- Evaluate hydrologic data-acquisition methods and procedures to ensureadequacy in meeting program requirements. This includes supportingDOE in the conduct of on-site audits and surveillances of field activitiesimplemented by project participants.

'294a

- valuate and interpret data obtained by project participants and preparerequired docu.ients.

- Integrate hydrologic data to provide conceptual and numerical models ofsite vicinity and region to support performance assessment and designactivities. Develop probabilistic estimates of ground-water travel tinesfrom repository to the accessible environment.

4) Geochemical

This consists of the chemical aspects of both the host rock andsurrounding environment and the fluids within them. It includes studiesof the mineralogy and petrology of site, ground-water dating,hydrogeochemistry, eochemical retardation, radionuclide solubilities, andnatural analogs. More specifically, the-Contractor shall:

- Define requirements and strategies for obtaining geothemiCal fild andlaboratory data to address issues identified in the SCPs. These w,3uld edocumented in the SCP progress reports and/or study plans related tostudies. equirements on field-testing shall o provided to projectcontractors.

- Evaluate geochemical data-acquisition methods and procedures to ensureadequacy in meeting program requirements. This includes supporting OOE inthe conduct of on-site audits and surveillances of field activitiesimplemented by project participants.

- Evaluate and nterpret-data obtained by project participants and preparerequired documents.

- Define requirements and strategies for assessfing-the effect of thein-situ environment on the waste package, the ability of the host roc ocontain radionuclides, and the ablility of the host rock and surroundingunits to retard radionuclides by chemical interactions.

- By integration of eochemical data, dvelop geochenical speciation andreaction path odels and develop conceptual hydrochemical models tosupport or refute alternative ground-water flow system models.

5) Drilling

SED!1 Contractor not responsible for this VIBS element, including coresanple management.

6) Environmental

- for the site selection and licensing processes, provide technicaldirection to each site in terms of dentifying environmental data needssuch as eather conditions and air quality, plant and aninal coiunitiesand habitats, agricultural sources, cultural and archaeological resources,noise, and background radiation. Evaluate adequacy of each proje ts tst

3 3

plans and technical control systens in providing data for licensinganalyses. Evaluations of test plans sall tas.e into accoust that xistincfacilities nraged in current testing are to e given consideration forany testing activities.

- Utilizing test data, perform analyses with models or provide technicaldirection to others to perform analyses with models to provide dat3 forsite performance assessment.

- Assist DOE in assessing and identifying strategies for mitigation of heenvironmental impacts that a repository ight have at each of thecandidate sites.

7) Socioeconomic

- For the site selection and licensing processes, identify additionalsocioeconomic data requirements such as de;,ographic characteristics,labor-force characteristics, ousing, com;nunity services, 3nd land us2.Evaluate he data and conduct appropriate analyses of the sites.

- Assist DOE in assessinr and idintifying strategis for .oFtio.ti*; or tsocioeconomic impacts that a repository might have at each of tecandidate sites.

8) Performance Assessment

- Develop (as needed), verify, validates benchnark, and document romutercodes for assessing the performance of the waste package. Identify andprioritize data required for performance assessment.

- Provide for peer review of analyses. Submit analyses to DOE for reviewand incorporation into the License Application.

1.X.0400 Repository

The ontractor shall e resDonsible for repository design; intifi:ation oftesting and development requirements; and technical direction, conduct, ndanalysis of the required testing and development activities. The tiviti2sto be erforned by the Contractor include, but are not limited to, tilefollowing:


- Provide management of repository activities including planning,scheduling, budgeting, controlling, and reporting.

- Using input from each of the three candidate repository sites, provideoverall repository planning and prepare a schedule for repositoryactivities for each site.

- Provide for interaction and coordination with other OCRW!1 prograrnparticipants on repository activities.

'4

- Provide technical expertise in geologic engine-ring necessary to p nand define the technical effort of participants in establishing tilescientific and engineering asis to demonstrate that the rpositoryconfiguration, including rock stability and seal performance, eets tneregulatory requirements.

- Provide study plans for the technical direction of participants toimplement necessary site characterization activities in the variousrepository disciplines.

2) Development and Testing

- Specify and provide technical direction for all repository testing anddevelopment activities including study of engineering properties of rockcharacteristics. Provide rock mechanics data requirements to te projectcontractors. Evaluate and apply rock mecnanics data in developing tnrepository design basis and in developing tha design.

- Evaluate equipment needs and develop equipment as required, incluingthe design, fabrication, and testing of prototypes. Tis licludesexcavation/transport equipment, waste handling equipment, anti ackfillequipment. Evaluate monitoring and instrumentation needs. Adaptexisting and develop new instruments as required.

- Establish sealing requirements, including requirements due to bothanticipated and unanticipated conditions, and develop saling conceptsfor the repository. Evaluate preclosure and postclosure concepts anddesigns for sealing shafts, underground excavations, and borenoles.Evaluate potential materials for sealing shafts, underground excavations,and boreholes. Test the performance of selected sealing materials anddesign. Provide input to repository design and performance assessmenttasks.

- Prepare the Advance Conceptual Design. and License Appl ication Design'for seals consistent with workscope for the repository faciliti2s dcsi-n.

3) Facilities

- For each site, review the repository SCP conceptual design, allrepository design studies performed subsequent to completion f he SC?conceptual design, and repository system requirements documents. 3ased onreviews, identify additional studies that should be performed prior to orduring Advanced Conceputal Design and recommend changes, if necessary tothe site-specific system requirements or subsystem design requirementsdocuments.

- laintain the repository subsystem design requirements documentsconsistent with the site-spetific system requirements documents and theMGDS Generic Requirenents Document. Evaluate proposals to change therepository subsystem design requirements documents and snitrecommendations to the DOE Change Control Board.

- Perfom rpository Advanced Conceptual Design. uarnit the rpositoryAdvan.:cd Conc2ptual Dsign to DOE-HQ for review and approval and to 2achsite for review and coment. Conduct design review Meetings, provideproposed resolution of conments to DOE-HQ, and incorporate corilments perDOE-HQ direction.

- Perform repository License Application Design and analyses for DOE'ssubmittal of the License Application to RC. Assist DOE-HQ in resolvingcomments on the repository portion of the License Application.

- Consistent with the License Application, provide the design, includingdrawings and specifications, for the repository.

- Provide Title III design inspection services.

- rovide economic analyses for rpository designs, and ti ipact ofthese designs on the total cost of the Nuclear aste tlanac~meit Systrn.

- Ensure integration of the exploratory shaft facility into tnerepository fa-ility design, construction, op2ration, and losur2 li.is.

4) Operations/tlaintenance

- Provide input to the design and safety analyses of the repositorythrough definition of (1) nodes of operation of all systens andequipment; (2) procedures for assembly, emplacement, monitoring, andretrieval of waste package; and (3) maintenance requirements of th2operational facility.

- Develop repository facility operating concepts and odes and conductnecessary trade-off and optimization studies in areas such aswaste receipt; lag storage; packaging and handling; seal and ackfillemplacement; hauling, storage, and disposal of mined material; wastepackage fabrication, preparation, repair, handling emplacement, andretrieval; safeguards and security; acceptance testing and radinessr2views; aintenance and logistics support; and personnel staffing.

5) Decommissioning

- Establish decommissioning concepts, requirements and design ncessaryto support the License Application Design.

6) Repository Performance Assessment

- Develop (as needed), verify, validate, benchmark, and documentcomputer codes for assessing the performance of the repository. Identifyand prioritize data required for performance assessment.

- Perform analyses that demonstrate with reasonable assurance that therepository engineered barrier system dsigns will meet the regulatoryrequirements. Assure that data and analytical models have een

qualified, documented, and controlled.

- Provide for peer review of analyses. Submit analyses to DOE for rviowand incorporation into te Licensa Application Design.

- Identify and analyze uncertainties in repository elements as theyrelate to site characterization data.

- Confirm and maintain the performance objectives of the repository andestablish the list of systems, structures, and components important tosafety and engineered-barriers important to waste isolation.

l.X.0500 Regulatory and Institutional

The Contractor shall'be-responsible for the management and conduct of theli-ensing process, and shall assist DOE in meeting environmental conpliancaresponsibilities, and in conducting institutional activities. The activitisto be performed by the Contractor include, but are not linited to, tiiefollowing:

1) M1anagesient and Inteoration

- Provide management of activities including planning, scheduling,budgeting, controlling, and reporting.

- Provide for interaction and coordination with other OCRWI1 progranparticipants related to regulatory and institutional activities.

- Provide'technical and regulatory expertise in the full ranS ofdisciplines necessary to provide guidance and review of all regulatory andinstitutional documents, both internal and external. Assist DOE byobtaining consultants and outside technical and regulatory expertise.forreview of specialized documents and licensing strategies.

2) Licensing

Tihe Contractor sall parform activities necessary to esure cooapliant inregulatory requirements'and support the license application for the firstrepository, including preparation of analyses and documents. Theactivities to be performed by the Contractor include, but are not limitedto, the following:

- Submit SCP progress reports to OE-HQ, the three projects, and otherprogram participants for review. Document comments received and prepareproposed resolutions for DOE approval. Incorporate consents per DOEdirection. Provide updated technical direction to each site consistentwith the SCP progress reports.

- AssistDOE in the identification of regulatory requirements. This effortwill include review and analysis of all regulatory requirements ertinentto repository activities. The Contractor will review impleanntation of

-

existing regulatory rquirai-ents including definitions nployed in plannin?and design documlents, and recommend to DOE changes necessary o nsur2compl ia;ncc with regulatory requirements and to enhance the likelihzd ofobtaining a timely authorization to construct tne repository. For purposesof this effort, regulatory requirements will include but not be limited toregulations such as 10 CFR 2,. 20, Si, 60, 71, 72 and 170; tIRC staffguida;ica such as Regulatory Guides, Standard Review Plans, GenericTechnical Positions and letters received from various RC staff functions;NRC positions taken in reports; Statements of Consideration; AdvisoryCommittee on Reactor Safeguards Letters; and pertinent ase lw.

- Operate and maintain te Program's Licensing Support System. (Reference

-?Prvide licensing review of analyses, studies, plans, secifications, anddrawings to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and 0Ecommitments. The Contractor Mcill also rview all responses to te NR! orto other parties to ensure consistency with regulatory reNuirrents, D0tcommitments and DOE licensing policy.

- Provide support to DOE for all meetings wit t SIXC and for ll ot)i%licensing issues meetings. This effort will include: a) pr2-cieeting revim,of all materials to be presented, used as source material, or to e used asbackup material to ensure the material is appropriate, consistent withregulatory requirements, DOE commitments, and DOE licensing policy; b)review of dry run presentations; c) preparation of graphics and writtenmaterial for approval by DOE for presentation and to be published atmeeting summaries; d) preparation of complete mne2ting refern:2 paz'acsfor all parties prior to the meeting; and e) distribution of n-s neetingreference packages to all parties in eeping with DOE comnitmnnts fortinely notice.

- Prepare for DOE-HQ approval a complete License Apolication as rquiredunder 10 CFR 60 for a geologic repository at each of the candidate sites.The Contractor will review the repository License Application annltatdoutline and recommend for DOE approval changes and enhancements necessaryto ensur2 compliance witi regulatory requirements and completaness. T:Mj;effort will include all support necessary for submittal of te LizensoApplication for the designated site for construction of the repository, t.esuccessful conduct of the licensing process, and the receipt of theconstruction authorization.

- Establish and operate a comprehensive commitment tracking system inconjunction with its responsibilities to operate the Licensing SupportSystem. This commitment tracking system will provide the means to ensurethat all DOE commitments to the RC, States, Indian Tribes, other Federalagencies and other designated parties are tracked frog inception tosuccessful closure. This system will maintain the historical record of theorigin of the commitment, the actions taken by all parties and teagreements that represent the successful closure of each connite2nt.

. .8

- Establish and aintain a comprehensive document eaview and controlsystem. rhe purpose-of this system will be to esure that all incominVreports, correspondence, etc. aro rviened by t:ia tognizant organizations-and that infornatoni that could impact n the progra.-a is identified and ;integrated into theprogram licensing and other dedisions.

- Develop and aintaln the OCRIM Licensing Procedures Manual (LP). The LPM will provide-comprehensive procedures for the DOE and ontractorinteraction with-thb parties involved in the licensing process and the >'conduct of the licensing program.

- Recommend for DOE-HQ approval, and implement upon that approval,regulatory actions that will assist in ensuring early closure of licensingissues and improve the likelihood of timely authorizations from the 1C.These regulatory'actions will include Topical Reports, Regulatory andTechnical Issues Papers addressing either site-specffic or generic issues,-<proposed rule makfing, and proposed changes to'1PC or oth!r agency staff ;positions.

3) Environnent3l Coipliance

The Contractor snall perfori activities to assist DOE in ensuringcompliance with applicable Federal, state, and local statutory andregulatory requirements related to siting and te environment. 'Tiaactivities to be performed by the Contractor include, but are not limited to, the following:

- Assist DOE in identifying applicable Federal, State and local rulatory'environmental requirements. This effort will include review and analysisof all environmental requirements pertinent to repository activities. TheoContractor will define the necessary requirements for site-specificenvironmental and siting studies. The Contractor will reviewexisting compliance-efforts-and recommend to DOE changes necessary toensure compliance with environmental regulatory requirements and enhancethe likelihood of obtaining necessary pemfits and approvals in a tinely fS

fashion. *- -

- Provide analytical review of nvironriental dat' and studies to Unsurecompliance with environmental regulatory requirements, DOE cotinitn-ants and-DOE environmental policy. Based on these reviews, provide advice and -recommendations to DOE as it prepares responses to Congress, the States aidIndian Tribes, and otner interested parties. The advice andrecommendations are intended to ensure adequacy and consistency with -environmental regulatory requirements.

- Prepare for DOE-HQ approval environmental siting documents required to -comply with the NWPA and prepare environmental reports. Theseenvironmental reports will contain the inforiation necessary fordevelopment and preparation of the environmental impact statement (EIS).The Contractor will:

a) Assist DOE-HQ in te EIS scoping process. This effort ill includ3:(1) preparation and distrijution of tie Totice of Intent and anya:-?ipanying documents to the public of OOZ's intent to repar2 anEIS; (2) logistics support in securing locations for tile conduct oftile scoping meetings and public hearings; () preparation ofdescriptive material to be disseminated at the eetings ad h-2aringsas general information on the ontent of the IS; () review ofmeeting and haring transcripts to ascertain new DOE connitments andadditional data relevant to tne preparation of tle EIS; and (5)preparation of responses to comments and questions received at thescoping meetings and hearings.

b) Assist DOE in the preparation of the draft EIS Implementation Plan toIncorporate the results of the public scoping process and guide tepreparation for the EIS. This effort will include careful rviewl andanalysis of existing program documents as well as te ES requiremntsset forth under the ational nvironnental ?olicy Act and gouncil onEnvironmental Quality regulations.

^) Assist DOE in the dvelopm2nt of a detailed EIS ana"2n.rnt Plan toensure tinely EIS preparation. T;iis ffort will in luse sl2-i - ) ftarget tine lirtifs for EIS preparation, the rlationshio Int-.w-en t:i2

timing of environmental analyses preparation and decision-makingschedule, and the identification of organizational rportingrelationships within OCRI41I and the coordination concurrence processesneeded to produce the EIS.

d) Assist DOE in EIS data collection. This effort swill include: (1)analysis of environmental data to assess the impacts associate2d witsiting, constructing' operating, closing and decommissioning of a lilevel waste repository; (2) coordinate te monitoring of fieldactivities for EIS data collection; (3) coordinate the development ofmodels and other analytical tools for the preparation of tne ES; and(4) preparation of topical reports to be used as a reference in thepreparation of the EIS.

- Assist DOE in the developnent of agreerients with appropriIte Federal,State and local agencies. This effort will include review of ,''PA todetermine the roles of each gency in implementing 1'.IPA, revi2.w of existin7agreements and recommendation to DOE-HQ of the best agreement approac toensure consistency with te roles defined for each agency uider MJ0?A.

- Establish and maintain for DOE-HQ a comprehensive document review andcontrol system. The purpose of this system will be to ensure tat allincoming reports, correspondence and other documents are reviewed y tUecognizant organizations and that information that could impact on theprogram is identified and integrated.

- Assist DOE in the site selection methodology analysis to *ae perfor ed inaccordance with the DOE siting guidelines (10 CFR 960).

4) Communication and Liaison

'0

- Perform activities necessary to assist DOE in ensuring that teconsultation ani cooperation rquirements of the MUPA are met. Upon award,tie Contractor will aecone thoroughly familiar with the history of pastinteractions with the affected States and Indian Tribes.

- Assist in developing outreach and public information materials related tothe repository program. Provide analytical support in review of FacilitySpecific Outreach and Participation Plans. (Reference 10)

- Assist DOE in the organization development, and conduct of publicinteraction meetings, meetings between DOE and States and Indian Tribes,public briefings nd hearings related to issuance of major programdocuments, and other meetings as identified by DOE.'

- Assist DOE in-the preparation and disseninatilon of informationregarding t Contractor's activities.

5) Financial and Technical Assistance

- Assist DOE in conducting technical revi 3ls of ork roposed by af.:tedStates and Indian Tribes under grant requests-to ensure that tf wor isintegrated with site characterization activities conducted by DOE.

1.X.0630 Exploratory Shaft

The Contractor shall provide technical direction for exploratory shaft testingand provide design requirements for any necessary facility odifications. Thaactivities to be performed by the Contractor include, but are not limited to,the following:

1) Review the existing in-situ test programs and define requirements forchanges or for further testing; conduct analyses of test data.

2) Establish detailed design requirements for facility odifications anddecommissioning.

1.X.0700 Test Facilities

The Contractor shall assess the need and develop requirements for additionalfield test facilities and related support facilities.- Existing facilitiesengaged in current testing shall be given consideration.

I.X.0800 and Acquisition

The Contractor shall be responsible for the evaluation of land requirerientsfor the repository and the supporting facilities, and shall support the landacquisition process. The activities to be performed by the Contractorinclude, but are not limited to, the following:

1) Analyze, evaluate, and recommend the boundaries of the controlled

area wit;iin the ontext of the accessible environnents and otnersite-specific vari3oles.

2) Analy:z, evaluatl, and rconnand te land rquirenents forrepository support facilities (.g. roads, railroads.)

3) Support the preparation of analyses and documents required for landacquisition, for land use onsistent with established constraints, or forultimate disposition.

I.X.0900 Project anagement

Contract workscope for this WS element is included in Section IV.

b. Second Repository

The Contractor is assigned responsibilities for the second r2pository in ariassuch as integrating second repository requirements ith the Nlucl2ar aste',anagernant Systen and assisting scond repository progr.3n. particiat!6 to: 1)ensure compliance with the INWPA; and 2) ensure that tecnniquos, str3t<i.,design concepts, and plans developed for te first repository ar2 utilizedwhere appropriate and that lessons larned on the first respository areincorporated into second repository planning and implementation. In doing so,the Contractor shall, as directed by DOE-HQ, develop conceptual dscriptionsand data requirements/analyss. of second repository facilities and engineer-ecomponents to support any planned siting studies and perform prelinin3rystudies and analysas. The Contractor shall also ensure transf2r o terepository technology development program infornation, in particular teinternational cooperative efforts, to the Program participants.

2. FEDERAL INTERIM STORAGE

SEDfl Contractor not responsible for this 'WaS element.

3. -lOITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE

Should DOE receive Congressional approval for the onstruction of a NlonitoredRetrievaole Storage (MRS) facility as part of the uclear aste lanagenentSystem, the Contractor will be required to provide design and licensingservices for the RS. The Contractor will provide the design and licensingservices unless and until DOE makes a decision to transfer detailad desion,construction, and operations of the MiRS to a separate requirement to becompeted. The Contractor would be required to assist in the transition of thatworkscope to the other contractor. The Contractor will continue to retain theoverall uclear Waste Management System integration function.

The foll-owing scope of work will apply only if the Congress approvesconstruction of an fIRS. The workscope is listed under an RS 3S tat isa proposed revision to the OCRM- WS.

.) aA..L

3.0.0100 Environmental Evaluations

Ilanage the preparation of environmental documentation.' Recommend to DOEmechanisms and strategies for mitigation of environmental and .socioeconomicimpacts.

3.0.0200 Design

1) Identify facilities, systems, and equipment important to safety.Prepare requirements'for development and implementation of a designverification program, including the conduct of design feature tests andprototype equipment tests.. Specify the site data requirements for thedesign and environmental documentation.

2) Establish a rigorous design and interface nanagenent syste incompliance with RC and DOE requirements, and' develop detailed flRS design,functional, performance, and interface requirements controlled by thissystem.

3) Develop the design sufficient to support the license application incompliance with the facility and system requirements, the 1IRC requir2nentsof 10 CFR 72, and appropriate regulatory guides, applicable DOE Orders, and'other applicable RC requirements.

3.0.0300 Regulatory Compliance

1) Assist DOE in interactions With'the A1RC, EPA, and other Federal and/orState agencies.

2) Assist DOE in-all aspects of the MRS licensing process, includingregulatory considerations and resolution of technical issues prior toLicense Apptication.

3) Review, analyze, and provide assistance in identification of rgulatoryrequiroments. This includes defining licensing strategies, pr2paring pr2--licensing and'licensingidocunmnts, such as the Safety Analysis Report, '4License Application, and assisting in the licensing process.

4) Evaluate and establish the adequacy of data, reports, and analysesprepared for'inclusion in pre-licensing and licensing documents or used to .4support these documents.

5) Assist DOE and the MRS implementation contractor(s) as necessary toensure compliance with facility licensing requirements and in the,development of proper operating and maintenance procedures leading tocompliance with license requirements.

I C u

3.0.0400 Construction'

^33

SED11 Contractor not responsible for this WBS element.

3.0.0500 Quality Assurance

SEDM Contract workscope for this WBS element is included in Section IV.

3.0.0600 Operations

SEOM Contractor not responsible for this WBS element.

3.0.0700 Institutional Interactions

1) Assist in developing guidelines, tracking systems and providing otheranalytical support for the consultation and cooperation process.

2) Assist in developing outreach and public information materials.

3) Provide analytical support for assessing socioeconomic impact of NIRSdevelopment including identification of tile mechanisms and strategies formitigating such impacts.

4) Provide assistance to DOE in organization, development, and conduct ofpublic interaction meetings, meetings between DOE and State(s), publicbriefings and hearings related to issuance of major program docunents, andother meetings as identified by DOE.

5) Assist DOE in assessing the mechanisms and strategies for mitigation ofenvironmental and socioeconomic impacts of the MRS.

6) Assist DOE in the preparation and dissemination of information regardingthe Contractor's activities.

3.0.0800 Project Management

SEDD1 Contract workscope for this WBS element is included in Section IV.

4. TRANSPORTATION

The transportation system is comprised of: (1) the cask system, whichincludes the package, the vehicular conveyance, tie-downs, ancillaryequipment, and associated handling equipment designed for use within thetransportation system; (2) the transportation support system, which includesthe control center, maintenance and inspection facilities, and otherfacilities required to support waste transport; and (3) operational plans,which will be employed as implementing procedures to operate the cask systemand te support system. The operational plans shall consider the technical,

34

manage.ent, and institutional aspects of the transportation system. Theaotfvities to be performed by the Contractor include, but are not limited to,the following (listed under a proposed revision to te OCRWMI IBS):

4.0.0100 Cask Systens Development

SEDt1 Contractor not responsible for this WBS element.

4.0.0200 Support Systems Development

SEDM Contractor not responsible for this WBS element.

4.0.0300 Operations

SED1l Contractor not responsible for this WBS element.

4.0.0400 Institutional Planning and Analysis

SEDM Contractor not responsible for this UBS element.

4.0.0500 Systems Analysis

Perform needed transportation system studies in support of the technicalbaseline and the operational plans.

4.0.0600 Management and Integration

1) Develop and maintain a technical baseline containing the transportationcask and support system requirements and descriptions and the definition oftransportation system interfaces.

2) Determine the spent fuel and high-level waste cask and support systemrequirements (e.g. functional requirements and interface definitions).

3) Monitor and integrate transportation sub-program elements to ensureadherence to the technical baseline throughout the development of thetransportation system (cask system, the support system, and te operationalplans).

4) ncorporate the results of institutional issue resolution studies intothe technical baseline for the transportation system.

5) Provide technical liaison with transportation subprogram participantswhose activities include: cask system design, development, and fabrication;operational planning; and support system design and construction.

6) Establish management control and quality assurance activities for thetransportation element of the uclear Waste Management System (analogous tothose provided for the repository and MRS elements).

5. RESEARCH A OEVELOPMENT

35

This research and development work is funded under the Civilian Research andDevelopment Program appropriation, and is not a part of the ork to beassigned to the Contractor.

5.0.0100 Subseabed

SEDt1 Contractor not responsible for this WBS element.

5.0.0200 Dry Storage


5.0.0300 Rod Consolidation

SEDfl Contractor not responsible for this WBS element.

6. PROGRAM IUAIIAGEJEINT

5.3.3100 Progran Direction

According to the OCRWN WOS, the Program Direction element, BS 6.0.01,provides for Federal personnel to implement the UIWPA. Accordingly, this ;l3Selement is not applicable to any contractor activities.

6.0.0200 Systems Integration

The Contractor shall develop and control the configuration for the Hlulearwaste Management System to include specification and control of the functionaland performance requirements for the individual system elements and theinterfaces between those elements. Activities to be performed by theContractor include, but are not limited to, the following:

1) Evaluate, modify (as needed4 and control the Nluclear Waste IflanagenentSystem requirements baseline. This includes schedule, functionalrequirements, performance criteria, and interface controls. Evaluate,modify (as needed), and control the system description and maintain urrentdescriptions of each system element (repositories, IRS (if authorized), antransportation).

2) Select or, if necessary, develop an overall systems odel capable ofidentifying and evaluating system design, cost, and schedule impacts ofalternative system configurations.

3) Conduct analyses of alternative system configurations, includinginterfaces between the system elements.

4) Perform system studies as required to ensure total system integrationand optimization. Where appropriate, recommend changes to the systemsbaselines.

e3

5) Serve as Secretary to OCRlR! Program Change Control Board (CZB) andmaintain its records. Provide current system baseline information toProgram participants.

6) Monitor all system interfaces involving more than one Iuclear teaste'I'anagement System element to ensure that all physical and scheduleinterfaces are adequately characterized and baselined, that changes to theinterfaces are adequately controlled, and that lead responsibility fordesign of the interfaces is assigned. Perform analyses to ensure that allsuch interfaces have been identified and adequately characterized. Maintaincurrent interface descriptions.

7) Perform risk assessments and, where necessary, develop odels and codes,including required verification, validation and documentation to eetregulatory and licensing requirements for the uclear Waste ManagementSystem.

8) Develop estimates of the costs of each system lement of the fluclerWaste Management System. This includes costs for facilities and servicesprovided under the Nuclear Waste Fund (e.g., repository, transportation,waste acceptance, tc.). Such estimates ill be used as input dta toOOE-HQ for the Total System Life Cycle Cost analyses which ar2 to beperformed annually. Where necessary, develop additional capabilities toperform such estimates. In addition, estimates of costs borne by the wastegenerators that are directly related to waste-funded activities (e.g., coststo prepare, store, or package wastes at the waste generator sites) may alsoneed to be developed.

9) Ilanage, direct or monitor programs to evaluate and, if justified,develop various processes or technologies that will be used by or willstrongly affect more than one system element. Such processes ortechnologies nclude-dry rod consolidation techniques/equipment, robotics,packaging techniques ffabrication, sealing, decontaminating, testing, etc.),and secondary waste treatment processes, including volume reduction ofnon-fuel bearing components.

6.0.0300 Policy

SEOM Contractor not responsible for this WS element.

6.0.0400 Outreach

SEDU Contractor not responsible for this WS element, other than those coveredin Section III.C.1 and III.C.3.

6.0.0500 Administration

SEDI Contractor not responsible for this WBS element.

37

6.0.0500 Fund lanagement

SEOtN Contractor not responsible for this W3S element.

6.0.0700 Quality Assurance

Contract workscope for this WS element is included in Section IV.

6.0.0800 Technical Support


-3

IV. AIACEIENlT CONTROL SYSTEM

This Section describes functions and requirements of anagement controlsystems for the Contractor. These systems will specify how the contractworkscope is to be performed.

A. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENJT CONTROL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

The Contractors' management control system must meet OCRWM requirement aswell as relevant OE Orders, particularly 4700.1 and 2250.10. Upon award, theContractor shall begin preparation of a Project Management Plan (PtiP), aSystems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP), and a Quality Assurance Plan (QAPor QA Plan) all of which will be approved by DOE-HQ. rTose thre eydocuments will represent the basic agreement between DOE and the Contractor asto which OCRW1i and DOE requirements apply to SED contract work and when teyare applicable.

These three key documents will identify required plans and procedures to beprepared by the Contractor and program participants interacting with theContractor. A list of these plans and procedures as well as who prepares,concurs on, and approves them will be identified in the three key documents.

Requirements indicating when the management control system must bedemonstrated and approved are included in Section V.

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM

1. Project Management Functions

The Contractor shall provide technical, financial, schedular, andcontractual plans/strategies required to manage its work described in thisStatement of Work. The functions to be performed by the ontractorinclude, but are not limited to, the following:

a) Establish, maintain, and operate a project management syste toensure that all work under the contract is adequately defined,scheduled, budgeted, and performed in a manner that eets the schedule,cost, and technical requirements, and that the reporting requirements ofthe contract are satisfied.

b) Establish and implement procedures for a document control system tocontrol changes to baselined program management/technical documents.

c) Maintain and operate parts of the integrated Information ManagementSystem IMS) related to SEDN Contract work. Provide required hardwareand software to operate this part of the IS. Responsibilities includestorage and retrieval of existing and new information relevant to theContractor's work. The IS must be operated in a manner that satisfies

39

the data storage and retrieval requirements of the Licensing SupportSystem .

d) Perform internal contract management and control activitiesnecessary to direct technical and administrative efforts including shortand long-range planning, facilities management, financial analysis,contract reporting, staff training, procurement, and subcontractmanagement.

2. Project Management System Requirements

Basic requirements and guidance for development and implementation ofproject management control systems for OCRWM Program participants aredescribed in two documents, DOE Order 4700.1 (Reference 4) and the OCRWi1Program Management System Manual.

DOE Order 4700.1, Project Management System, establisies the DOE rojectmanagement system and provides implementing instructions for development,approval, and execution of DOE's outlay program acquisitions.Requirements in 4703.1 and its references to Major Systems Acquisitionsare apflicable to the Contractor's work on the first repository and theMRS. The first repository and the i;RS nave been designated as ajorSystems Acquisitions. As required by DOE Order 4700.1, the Contractorwill be required to establish a performance measurement system that can bevalidated to meet the Cost/Schedule Control System Criteria (C/SCSC) inDOE Order 2250.18.

The OCRWM Progran Management Systen Manual provides supplementaryrequirements and guidance for OCRW11 Program participants including theContractor. The Program Management System anual describes subordinateOCRWM documents that provide additional project management control systemdetail and are also applicable to this contract. As noted previously, itis anticipated that the OCRWfl documents will be revised as needed toreflect the new program organization as the Contractor begins ork.

3. Project Management Plan

The Contractor is required to prepare a Project ;lanagemnnt Plan (l?) forContractor activities. The P will be approved by DOE-f1Q. Input to theP1rP on DOE organizational responsibilities will be provided by DOE-HQ,including responsibilities of the DOE Project Offices, Operations Officesand their contractors. The Contractor is responsible forpreparing, distributing, controlling, and updating the document. Revisionsto te PMP will also be approved by DOE-HQ.

Guidance on preparation and organization of the PMP is provided inAttachment II-4 of DE Order 4700.1. Unless specifically agreed to byDOE-HQ, the PP will contain all information as recommended by DOE 4700.1.In addition, it will address the regulatory and institutional requirementsin the OCRI-Il Program Management System Manual. Technical control systemswill be addressed in the SEDHl SElI? and the PP needs only to reference the

0

SEII. Likewise, Quality Assurance (QA) systems will be addressed in theSEDrI QA Plan and ,e MP needs only to reference the QA Plan.

The SEDII PP will establish requirements for preparation of SED.*t projectmanagement, regulatory, and institutional plans and-procedures asspecified by DOE 4700.1 and its references, and the OCRUiI Progranllanagement SysteJ Manual. Other project anagement, regulatory, andInstitutional plans that the contractor considers necessary to controlcontract work should also be addressed n the P. The SED1 PP shallinclude a matrix that, as a minimum, lists the SEOM program management,regulatory, and institutional plans and procedures, who approves them, andwhether they are or are not required for authorization-to begin technicalwork.

C. TECHNICAL CONTROL $y$TEM

1. Systems Engineering "anagenent Plan

The OCRWM.SEMIP (Reference 11) specifies technical control recuirenents forthe entire OCRW!4 program. Consistent-with the OCRt1, SEIlP, te OGR SEf1P(Reference 12) specifies technical control rquirenents for wore oerforncunder WBS 1.0.0000, I'ined Geologi Disposal System. If the RS isapproved y Congress, it is anticipated that aSEHP for the fIRS will beprepared.

The Contractor is required to prepare a SETIP that implements therequirements of the OCRWM SEMP for all workscope and specificallyimplements the requirements of the OCR SEEP for workscope under 'JBSelement .0.0000 and IRS SEMP for work-scope under UBS element 3.0000 (ifand when the MRS SIP is prepared). The SEDM SEMP will definerequirements for control of technical work that is the responsibility ofthe Contractor, whether the work is actually performed by the Contractoror another contractor performing work under Contractor technicaldirection.

The SEDI1 SEMP shall nterface with the PMP and the A Plan.

Key items to be addressed in the SEMP are as follows:

a) Identf Catfon of iplementing technical procedures and plansrequired for performance of work, organizations responsible forpreparing the plans and procedures, the organizations responsible forconcurrence and approval, and whether or not the procedure isrequired for authorization to begin technical work.

b) Systems engineering approach to be used.

cl Configuration control, including control of technical documentssuch as systems and subsystems requirements documents, drawings, andspecifications.

4IL Design reviews and other technical reviews including peer

41

reviews; and, the requirements for documentation of design reviews.

e) Test management.

f) Software control/verification.

9) Technical interface control.

h) Methodology for performance assessment.

i) Docuientation of technical decisions including which and whendecisions must be documented and how they are to be documented;

In coverage of the above items, the SEMP shall specify requirements forperformance of technical work including preparation of implementing workplans and procedures. Implementing work plans will focus on whattechnical work is to be performed, the resources required, and theschedule. Implementing procedures will focus on ho technical work is tobe performed and will include step-by-step actions where necessary toensure control of work.

The Contractor is responsible for preparing, distributing, ontrolling,and updating the SEOM SEMP. The SEMP will be submitted for DOE-HQapproval. Following approval, the SEMP will be issued as a controlleddocument. It must be kept up to date at all tines. Revisions to te SEEPwill also be approved by DOE-HQ.

2. Work Plans

The purpose of work plans is to ensure integration of technical work whicniis performed under more than one major WBS element. Work plans shall beprepared for major contract activities such as:

a) Advanced Conceptual Design (ACD),b) License Application Design (LAD),c) Final Procurement and Construction (PC) Design, andd} License Application Safety Analysis.

As a minimum, ork plans will address the scope of work and deliverailesto be prepared, tie schedule and resources to accomplisi the w1ork, and ti2reference documents that establish requirements for performing work.

Work plans will be approved by DOE-HQ prior to initiation of work for tephase covered by the work plan. If significant replanning becomesnecessary, DOE-HQ may require revision of a work plan.

D. QUALITY ASSURANCE

1. Quality Assurance Functions

Quality assurance functions to e performed by the Contractor include;.butare not limited to, the following:

42 9

a) Develop and implement an internal Quality Assurance Program. Theinternal QA program will be described in a formal A Plan that will bereviewed and approved by DOE-HQ and te RC. The Contractor will beresponsible for all actions necessary to ensure the continued acceptanceof the QA Plan by the URC and will recommend for DOE approval any changesnecessary to assure continued RC approval.

b) Develop all necessary implementing procedures to put in to effect theContractor's approved internal QA Plan and ensure that all personnel aretrained as necessary in those procedures.

c) Perform audits, surveillances, management assessments and inspectionsto verify the continued adequate implementation of the SEDII Contractor'sinternal QA Plan. These activities will include both verification ofcompliance with QA requirements and adequacy of the technical andprogrammatic results being achieved by the various operating elaents ofthe Contractor's forces.

d) Support DOE in the full range of QA activities necessary for DOE tocarry out its QA responsibilities with regard to OCRIflt and its rspectiveProject Offices. These aivities will include participation inaudits, surveillances and inspections for both compliance and adequacy,preparation of reports on the above activities, performance of trendanalyses, review of root cause analyses, and review of corrective actionreports for adequacy.

e) Develop and conduct QA indoctrination and training for the.Contractor's activities and in support of OE for other progranparticipants.

f) Review technical reports, design documents and procurement documentsto ensure compliance with QA requirements for the Contractor's activitiesand in support of DOE for other program participants.

a) Analyze QA audits to identify deficiencies and reconmend correctiveaction for the Contractor's activities and in support of DOE for otherprogram participants.

h) Review QA plans and procedures for DOE projects and other contractorsand recommend action.

1) Assist DOE in continuing development of DOE QA plans and procedures.The Contractor will review all existing QA documents and propose for DOEapproval modifications necessary to ensure compatiability with theContractor's QA program and the QA programs of other programparticipants.

2) Quality Assurance Requirements

The Contractor Quality Assurance system shall meet the applicablerequirements of DOE Order 5700.6B, Quality Assurance (Reference 13),t;ae

43

OCRUfI Quality Asurance Management Policies and Requirenents (Reference14), the OGR Quality Assurance Plan For High-Level Radioactive WasteRepositories (Reference 15), 10 CR 60 (Reference 16), 10 CFR 5 AppendixB (Reference 17), 10 CFR 71 (eference 18), 10 C 72 Refarence 19),AIlSI/ASIlE NQA-1 (Reference 20) and any other applicable QA requirementsand/or program QA documents (such as subsequent issuance of OCRWIM RS orTransportation QA Plans) that are necessary to obtain requiredlicenses and to ensure quality activities, data & products. In additionto the above requirements, this QA program will be evaluated by DOEagainst the applicable criteria of the uclear Regulatory Commission(INRC) Review Plan: "Quality Assurance Programs for Site Cha-acterizationof High-Level Waste Repositories" (Reference 21).

3. Quality Assurance Plan

The Contractor shall prepare a Quality Assurance Plan that applies toall workscope performed under the contract. Insofar as QA require-mentsare different for the various system elements, the QA Plan snall indicatewhere documents or criteria apply. The QA Plan shall include criteriafor determining applicability of specific QA requirements; i.e.,establishment of a system for assignment of levels of QA t workscope.

The QA Plan shall identify and require development of implementing QAplans and procedures required for conduct of work in a atrix along withthe organization responsible for preparing the document, organizationsresponsible for concurring on the document, organization responsible forapproving the document, and whether or not the plan or procedure isrequired for the release to begin technical ork.

The Contractor is responsible for preparing, distributing, controlling,and updating the QA Plan. DOE-HQ will approve the QA Plan, and anyrevisions.

E. I1ANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM PROCEDURES

The purpose of these procedures is to ensure control of orkscope andactivities such that Program requirements are met. Procedures will ipl-2:entrequirements in the PP, SEMP, and QA Plan.

The Contractor is responsible for preparing, distributing, controlling,and updating procedures applicable to work performed by the Contractor.Concurrence and approval of procedures will be completed in accordance withthe PMP, SE11P, and QA Plan. As individual procedures are prepared andrevised, they must be reviewed for consistency with the PP, SEMlP, and A Planand with other Contractor procedures. Procedures must be kept up to date anddistribution must be controlled. Adherence to procedures will be a keyelement in audits and surveillances conducted by others.

The Contractor is responsible for training staff on the requirements inprocedures and for establishing and maintaining records on training conpleted.

'4

Procedures will focus on how work is to be performed including step-by-stepdescription of activities. Procedures will also dentify organizationally hois responsible for performing work.

Ilinimun contents requirements for procedures are as follows:

1) Purpose of procedure-2) Applicability3) Requirements implemented/source of requirements4) Responsibilities5) Procedure/instructions6) Records to be established and maintained/life of records

I

-I

I

. . - ;. I .. , ,

-1

45

V. TRANSITIOII PERIOD

This section describes activities during the transition period wen theContractor is required to prepare for initiation of contract workscope. Italso outlines the requirements and process for receipt for DOE authiorizatioilto begin technical workscope, and phase-in of work from existing contractors.A requirement is also established for the Contractor to assist in thetransition of work to another contractor, if needed.

A. SUI11ARY OF TRAtNSITIOII PERIOD

Initiation of all workscope described herein is anticipated to occur over atransition period. During the transition period, the Contractor willorganize, staff, and equip the required offices; complete familiarization iththe program; prepare a management system for controlling work; train staff;conduct a thorough review on readiness to begin technical wrx leading to DOEauthorization to begin technical work; begin to assume responsibility forthe Contractor workscope; and omplete phase-in of wor fron existingcontractors.

Figure .1 illustrates the activities to be performed during te transitionperiod leading to authorization to begin full phase-in of quality-affectiaswork by October 1, 1989.

A later transition of work from the Contractor to an IlRS contractor nayalso occur.

B. TRAUISITIOI PLAJ

The Transition Plan in the Contractor's proposal shall be updated based n DOEcomments and approved by DOE-HQ prior to staffing beyond key personnel andequipping the offices. Organizing, staffing, and equipping the offices shallbe consistent with the Transition Plan, and with the Contract Schedulesections that specify locations of work to be performed, governnent-furnishedproperty/facilities, and key personnel requirements. The Transition Planshall cover the period of tine from contract award to completion of pase-iifrom existing contractors. It is anticipated that this transition period edilllast approximately two to three years.

Information to be included, as a inimum, in the transition plan is asfollows:

1) Organization

2) Staffing including types, numbers, and levels of personnel requiredand when personnel would be required

3) Office locations

4) Development/implementation of management control systems

6

FIGURE V. ITRANSITION

LTE (PER TRANSITION PLAN)STAFMIN

OFFICEPREPARATION

PROGRAM _ __ ___FAMUARIZATION

. . . =~~~up bPsn * DOE"''... I . i ao^P ^ ^~~PPROVAL CRFTIL PLNS&

MAAGEMENT A A ECONTROL

DEVELOPMENT . " I &

TRAININGOF STAFF

. ., - _ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ADDITONAL TR m

4 4 4 ~~~AUTHfORIZATION AUTHORZATMOSEEwCO JDO TO N TO BeG"

OF . ALT PHASE-n FULL PHASE-IN.EOM I TRANSIION AF .C L WOOf OF OUAITY.

COTRACTOR ONRACT RNS AFFECTINGWORIC AFFECTWNGW

AWARD Iy~~ _

-Fl 9 - FT-lO 9D- -FY ifO

10/.7 103' 10139

S-E TALE v Fr PLmwATmO OF w tro ExSI CONTRACTORS--RA~fflfSS MV~WIS 'CCESSpM.LVCOWLETD RWSi 30T.02

5) Approach to familiarization with completed and ongoing activities andexisting planning, including interactions with existing DOE andcontractor organizations.

5) Training

7) Readiness process to authorization to begin technical sork

8) Milestones and schedules for all activities during the transitionperiod.

C. AUTHORIZATION TO PERFORM TECHNICAL WORK

Establishment of the management control system shall also proceed inaccordance.with the transition plan. Before substantial work proceeds ondetailed plans and procedures, the tlP, the SEMP, and the QA Plan should beissued at least once in draft form For review by Contractor staff followed yDOE to ensure they are integrated and meet DOE requirements.

The Contractor is not authorized to perform technical work with the exceptionof familiarization with the program until the anagenent control systen is aplace and approved y DOE, the facilities and equipment are ready, and tilestaff is trained to the management system. On an exception basis by approvalfrom DOE, other technical ork may proceed provided it can be snown that theproposed work is not quality-affecting. Quality-affecting refers in generalto the quality of items important to safety or important to waste isolation.It is not anticipated that validation of the performance measurement systemwill be a prerequisite for authorization to begin technical work.

In parallel ith establishment of the management system, the contractor willassemble a Readiness Review Team that will assess readiness to begin technicalwork. The Contractor will also establish a training program to ensuretraining of staff on procedural requirements before authorization to begintechnical work. The readiness review and training program will be conductedin accordance with approved procedures. Records of readiness and trainingwill be prepared and maintained as specified by the procedures. When te SJTfReadiness Review Team has determined that the Contractor is ready to begintechnical work, a recommendation report shall e submitted to te DOContracting Officer or his designee. The report shall recommend which ;,or isready to proceed, document the basis for conclusions, and the process utilizedby the Readiness Review Team.

Interfacing between the contract-or and DOE on the readiness process will beidentified in DOE direction that will be prepared for the readiness reviewprocess. The DOE direction will identify the DOE readiness process andspecific prerequisites to be met by the contractor prior to the authorizationto perform technical work.

D. TRANSITION OF 4ORK TO THE SEWM CONTRACTOR

1. Status Of Existing Contracts

8

Table V.1 identifies major DOE contractors that are or :/ill be performingwork for the OCRU111 Program.

Information is categorized by the WBS as follows: ;

a) Repositories- DOE-HQ- Salt Repository Project (SRP)- Basalt Waste Isolation Project (IP)- Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations

b) Monitored Retrievable Storagec) Transportationd) Program Management

Project (tUiSI)

For these OCRWJI Program. areas, te table provides information on the nary.of the contractor, title/workscope, reference number to e OCRWII WDS, andcontract period (both base and options, if any).

2. Transition Of Work To The SEDJI Contractor.

The initial emphasis of the Contractor is to be on worc related to th3site charactelization work for the three first repository candidate sitesas described in the Site Characterization Plans, Site CharacterizationPlan Progress Reports, and the Study Plans. Following authorization tobegin limited technical work, the Contractor shall be ready to initiateeformal evaluation of the site characterization program by nid-FY 199.The Contractor shall conduct the evaluation in such a fashion that theresults can be factored into the program prior to initiation of in-situtesting in the exploratory shaft facility at any of the first repositorycandidate sites.

By the end of FY 1989, the Contractor shall be ready to begin fullphase-in of work from existing contractors, including engineering anddesign. In particular, the Contractor is responsible for the initiation-of Advanced Conceptual Design (ACD) for the three first repositorycandidate sites. Such design will be initiated y the Contractor at t,beginning of FY 1990. Prior to that, the Contra:tor will follow andmonitor the pre-ACD engineering studies being conducted by the existing ^;project design contractors. These pre-ACD engineering studies, which wif-1focus on system and subsystem trade-off studies leading to preferreddesign options, will be documented by the existing contractors by the endof FY 1989. These studies will provide a firm basis for the Contractor toprepare the ACD, including drawings, specifications, cost/scheduleestimates, and LAO design requirements.

Table V.2 identifies, for each existing major DOE contractor identifiedinTable V.1 above, which parts if any of the contractor's workscope is to bepotentially turned over to the Contractor and approximately when theContractor should be prepared to accept responsibility for the work. -TheTable also identifies deliverables from existing contractors expected tobe available for use by the Contractor. This information is based on

'i9

preliminary planning for the FY 1988 and FY 1989 budgets and will evolveas te Progran natures.

For each of the transitions of work indicated, it is anticipated teeexisting contractor will provide support to the Contractor during tnetransition. It is anticipated that tis supoort will begin before thescheduled phase-in period and will be available on an as-needed basis aslong as tne existing contract remains in effect.

E. TRANSITION OF SEDN CONTRACTOR WORK TO MS CONTRACTOR

As indicated in the Introduction, the lead responsibility for MRS design andlicensing may transfer to another contractor. If DOE selects this contractualapproach, the Contractor will be required to assist in the transition of workto the other contractor.

A 0

Page 1 of 7

TABLE V.1

- MAJOR PRIME CONTRACTORS PERFORMING RELATED WORXSCOPE FOR- THE OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

i ,_____________________~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ .__ ___

SCOPE OF WORC/CONTRACTNUMBER/CONTRACT TITLE

WORKSCOPEPERFORMED FOR

CONTRACT PERIOD(BASE PLUS OPTIONS)CONTRACTOR NAME WS

_ __ _ _ __ __ ___ b_ __ __ _ ___ ,,__ __ _ ___ __ ___ ___ _ _ __-------- _ ---_- -_ ----------

EQSIITRES:

Associated Universities.Inc.

Battelle MemorialInstitute PacificNorthwest ivision

Associated Universittes,Inc.

Battelle MnorialInstitute - PacificNorthwest ivision

University of CaliforniaLawrence BerkeleyLaboratory (LEL)

Waste Package ScientificSupportOE-AC02-76CH00016Operation of BrookhavenNational Lab.

Performance Assessment -OE-AC06-77RL01830*Pacific NorthwestLaboratory Operating& Management Contract"

Preclosure Risk AssessmentCE-AC2-76CH000 166Operatfon of BrookhavenNat'l Lab*

Materials CharacterizationCenterDE-ACO6-77RL01830*Pacific Northwest Labora-tory Operating & Manage-ment Contract

Geosciences SupportCE-AC03-76SFoo098Operation of BerkeleyNational Laboratorya

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

OOE-NQ

DOE-HQ

DOE-HQ

COE-HQ

COE-HO

12/31/87'

09/30/89*

12/31/87*

09/30/899

"9./30/87*

SRA Technologies. Inc. [IS OevelopmentDE-ACOl-8TRw0007"Technical Support Servicesto Assist in the Planningand Sping of an IS andImplementation Plan for thethe First igh-Level Radio-active Waste Repositorym

1.0 OOE-HQ 02/05/89 (withtwo 12-monthoptions)

'SubJect to S-year renewal periods in accordance with FAR Part 17.6.

51

Page 2 of 7

TABLE V.1

MAJOR PRIME CONTRACTORS PERFORMING RELATED WORKSCOPE FOR

THE OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

__-_ -- - -_ - ------ -_--------__ ____ ____ ____ ___- _ ________- - -… -- -- ---- - - - ---------

SCOPE OF WORK/CONTRACT WORK SCOPE CONTRACT PERIODCONTRACTOR NAME NUMBER/CONTRACT TITLE WaS PERFORMED FOR (BASE PLUS OPTIONS)

… ---- _ _ - - ____ ---- - -- - _ __ _ _ _ ____-------- - -- - - --- _ _

TBD Design and Implementationof a Licensing SupportSystem

1.0 DOE-HQ T80

Rockwell International

Corp.Integrating Contractor

DE-AC06-77RL1030

*Hanrord Site Operations

Contract"

1.1 (All) SWIP 06/28/87

Westinghouse Hanford

CompanyIntegrating Contractor &Development TestingDE-AC06-86FF02170'Hanford Operations andEngineering Contract"

1.1 BWIP 09/30/92*

MAC-Technical Services

CompanyTechnical Support Services

to OE-QL

DE-AC06-87RL10840

OSupport Services for SWIP"

1.l (All) awl? 03/31/90 (with

seven 1-year

options)

Battelle MemorialInstitute PacificNorthwest Division

Westinghouse HanfordCompany

Research/Testing

OE-ACO-77RL01830

*PNL Operating Manage-

ment Contract"

Development/Testing

DE-AC06-76FF02170

"Management Operation

of the Hanford

Engineering Development

Laboratory*

1.1

1.1.2

SWIP 09/30/89

BWIP 06/28/87

Kaiser Engtneers/

Parsons-Srinckerhoff.Joint Venture

Morrison-Knudsen

Company. Inc.

A/E Design ESF and Reposi-

tory DE-AC06-80RL10000

"A/E Services for 3WIP0

1.1.2.1.1.4.

1.1.6

BWIP

SWIP

09/30/87 (withESF Title III,ACD and FPC

OestgnOptions)

09/30/87(with optionsfor ESF andRepositoryConstruction)

Construction Manager for ESF

OE-AC06-80RL10343

"Construction Manager. BWIP"

*Subject to 5-year renewal periods in accordance with FAR Part 17.6.

52

Page 3 of 7

TABLE V.1

MAJOR PRIME CONTRACTORS PERFORMING RELATED WORKSCOPE FORTHE OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE ANAGEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK/CONTRACT WORKSCOPE CONTRACT PERIODCONTRACTOR NAME NUMBER/CONTRACT TITLE WBS PERFORMED FOR (BASE PLUS OPTIONS)

_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __________ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ ________ __ _ _ ___

Science ApplicationsSnt'l. Inc.

Technical & Managementsupport Services to DOE-NVOE-ACO8-87NV10576Technical L Management

Support Services for theODE OCRWM Program Concern-ing Yucca Mt., Nye County.

NV*

1.2 (All) NNWSI 03/03/90 (withoptions to03/97)

Reynolds Electrical &Engineering Co.. Inc.

Logistics, maintenance.construction. & drillingsupportOE-AC08-84NV10327Wfeapons Test Support

Services at evada TestSite and Other AssignedLocations

1.2 (All) NNWSI 09/30/88,

AT&T Technologies. Inc.

University of California

Performance assessment.systems, repository designOE-AC04-760P00789*Sandia National LaboratoryManagement & Operationn

Waste Package Design andDevelopmentW-7405-ENG-48*Operatin of Lawrence Liver-more Nat'l Lab

1 2 2.1.1.2.4

1.2.2

NNWSI 09/30/88'

09/30/87'KNWSI

Fqnix & Scisson, Inc.

Holmes Narver. Inc.I

Engineering Support fordrilling activities/subsur-face design ESF)OE-ACOS-84NVl0322*Engineering Support forOrilling Mining Activities*

Surface acility DesignSupport (ESF)DE-ACOS-86NV10471"Perform Management Engi-

neering, Technical SupportComiwnications, ConstructionsMaterial Testing. Operation &Maintenance Services

1.2.3.1.2.6

1.2.3.1.2.6

NNWSI 12/31/88

NNWSI 09/30/90

'Subject to 5-year renewal periods in accordance with FAR Part 17.6.

53

Page 4 of 7

TABLE V.1

MAJOR PRIME CONTRACTORS PERFORMING RELATED WORKSCOPE FOR

THE OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK/CONTRACT WORKSCOPE CONTRACT PERIODCONTRACTOR AME NUMBER/CONTRACT TITLE WBS PERFORMED FOR (BASE PLUS OPTIONS)_____ - - - ----------- - --_ -_-____________ ____________- _- _ - _______________-----…------------------

University of California

U.S. Department ofInterior GeologicSurvey

Geochemistry. radionuclidemigration, and in-situtestingW-7405-ENG-36tNos Alamos NationalScientific LaboratoryManagement Operation"

Geologic/hydrologicinvestigationsDE-AIOS-78EI44802*Conduct Geologic. Geo-graphical, Hydrologic.Seismological Investiga-tion in the Support ofDOE's Waste ManagementActivities"

1.2.3.1.2.6

1.2.3

NHWSI 09/30/87"

NNwSr 12/31/99

Battelle MemorialInstitute

Technical Integrator

DE-AC02-83CHl0140

*Management Activities

for the DOE's Nat'l Waste

Terminal Storage Program"

1.3(All) SRP 09/30/87

(Recompetition

now in prog-

ress. see next

entry)

TO Integration Support

Services (Request for

Proposals)

Technical Field Services

(Request for Proposals)

1.3 (All) SRP

1.3 (All) SRP

10/01/87 thru

09/30/90

(with options

up to seven

years)

10/01/87 thru

09/30/90

(with options

up to seven

years)

TO

Fluor Engineers &Constructors -Advanced TechnologyDivision

Repository A/E Design

DE-AC02-83WM46656

'ALE Conceptual Design of

Waste Repository*

1.3.4 SRP 09/30/85

(Thru Concept-

ual Design

with options

for Titl I

and Title II

designs)

'Subject to 5-year renewal periods in accordance with FAR Part 17.6

I54

Page of 7

TABLE V.1

MAJOR PRIME CONTRACTORS PERFORMING RELATED WRKSCOPE FORTHE OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RAOIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK/CONTRACT WORKSCOPE CONTRACT PERIODCONTRACTOR NAME - nUMBER/CONTRACT TITLE waS PERFORMEO FOR (BASE PLUS OPTIONS)

---- ------- -------

Parsons-Redpath

Parsons-Brinckerhoff/PB-KID

Roy F. Weston, Inc..

Exploratory Shaft Facility(ESF)OE-AC02-83CHl0125"Construction Manager forExploratory Shaft in Salto

ESF A/E DesignOE-ACO7-86*M46664IA&E Contract for

Exploratory ShaftFacilitiesm

OCRW Technical SupportServicesDE-ACOl-83NE44301Technlcal Support forthe Coordination ofNat'l Waste TerminalStorage Program",

1.3.6

1.3.6

All

SRP 08/31/87(Thru SFpletion)

Com-

SRP

OOE-HQ

OS/01/88

07/31/87

MKNITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE:

Roy F. Weston. Inc. CCRWM Technical SupportServicesDE-ACOl-83NE44301Technical Support forthe Coordination of theNat'l Waste Terminal

Storage Program

3.0 COE-HQ 07/31/87

Battelle MemorialInstitute - PacificNorthwest Division

MRS Technical SupportOE-AC06- RLO1830wOperation of PacificNorthwest Nat'l Labs*

3.0 RL 09/30/88*

Ralph M. Parsons Co. Architect & EngineeringServicesOE-AC06-84RL10436"A&E Services for Concep-tual & Advanced ConceptualDesign of Project 360Monitored Retrieval StorageFacilities*

3.0 RL 09/30/87

'Subject to -year renewal periods in ccordance with FAR Part 17.6.

55

Page 6 of 7

TABLE V.1

MAJOR PRIME CONTRACTORS PERFORMING RELATED WORKSCOPE FORTHE OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RAOIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK/CONTRACT WORKSCOPE CONTRACT PERIODCONTRACTOR AME NUMBER/CONTRACT TITLE W8S PERFORMED FOR (BASE PLUS OPTIONS)

___ _- _ -__-_ - _ ______-_ -____ - _ -________________-_ -_____ - _ - _ _ -__-_ -_ _____ -_ -________________________

Roy F. Weston. Inc.

EG&G Idaho. Inc.

AT&T Technologies, Inc.

Martin MariettaEnergy Systems. Inc.


OCRhM Technical SupportServicesDE-ACo-83NE443010Technical Support forthe Coordination of theNat'l aste TerminalStorage Programw

Cask DevelopmentOE-AC07-76ID01570OPrime Operating Contractorfor the Idaho NationalEngineering Laboratory'(RFP OE-RP07-86I012625 inprogress)

Cask Development. TechnicalSupport ReviewOE-AC04-760P007S9*Sandia National LaboratoryManagement & Operation"

Transportation OperationsProgram OperationsPlanningDE-ACOS-84R21400Oak Ridge GaseousDiffusion Plant, OakRidge Nat'l Lab, Y-12Plant, Paducah GaseousDiffusion Plant.Management & Operatio0n

Institutional Planning &Analysis ManagementIntegrationDE-AC01-83CH1019'Crystalline Rock Project'

4.0

4.1

4.1

4.4

4.4

OOE-HQ 07/31/87

ID 09/30/91 '

IO 09/30/88'

DOE-Ho 09/30/89'

Cm 09/30/88

*Subject to S-year renewal periods in accordance with FAR Part 17.6

r56

Page 7 of 7

TABLE V.1

MAJOR PRIME CONTRACTORS PERFORMING RELATEO WORKSCOPE FORTHE OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK/CONTRACT WORKSCOPE CONTRACT PERIODCONTRACTOR NAME NUMBER/CONTRACT TITLE WBS PERFORMED FOR (BASE PLUSOPT2XONS-

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:

toy F..Westcn. Inc.

Martin MariettaEnergy Systems, Inc.

OCRWM Technical SupportServicesDE-AC0I-83NE44301"Techntcal Support for theCoordination of Nat'l WasteTerminal Storage Program

Waste Systems Data &

Development ProgramOE-ACOS-840R21400'Oak Ridge Nat'l Lab. Lt &J.Management & Operation

6.0 OOE-HQ 07/31/87' _-,

6.0.2 OR 09/30/89'

., . , , .snI


Waste System Integration 6 C.02SupportDE-AC06-77RL01830*Pacific Northwest Labora-tory Operating & ManagementContract"

09/30/89

.I

. .

*Subject to S-year renewal periods In accordance with FAR Part 17.6

. 4' - ,

' r4

Page of 8

TABLE V.2

POTENTIAL TRANSITION OF WORKSCOPE TO SEOM CONTRACTOR

SCOPE OF WORK/ ANTICIPATED PHASE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLECONTRACTOR NAME CONTRACT NUMBER IN START DATE DELIVERABLES

_ _ _ _ -_-_-_-__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Associated Universities.

Inc. EBrookhavenNat1onal Laboratory

(BNL)]

Battelle Memorial

Institute PaciticNorthwest Laboratory(PNL)I

Associated Universities,Inc. (NL]

Waste Package Scientific

Support

OE-AC02-76CH00017

Performance Assessment

DE-AC06-77RL018 30

Preclosure Risk Assessment

DE-AC02-76CH00016

FY 1989

FY 1990

FY 1989

Battelle Memorial

Institute PNL]Materials Characterization

Center (MCC)

DE-AC06-77RL01830

None - MCC Program Plan

University ofCalitornia [LawrenceBerkeley Laboratory(LBL)]

Geosciences Support3E-AC03-76SF00098

FY 1989

SRA Technologies. Inc. EIS Development None

DE-AC01-87RW00072

- ErS Scoping and

Contents

Requirements

- EIS Annotated Table of

Contents

TBO Design and Implementation

of a Licensing Support

System

None

Rockwell Int l Corp. BWIP Integrating Con-

tractor to 06/28/87

OE-ACO6-77RL01030

See Westinghouse

Hanford Company

See Westinghouse Hanford

Company

J 8

Page 2 of 8

TABLE V.2

POTENTIAL TRANSITION OF WORKSCOPE TO SEO CONTRACTOR

SCOPE OF WORK/ ANTICIPATED PHASE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLECONTRACTOR AME CONTRACT UMBER IN START ATE DELIVERABLES

r Westinghouse KanfordCopany

Integrating Contractor &Oevelopment/Testing*E-AC06-86FFO2170

FY 1989 -Phase-in only ofWeS elementsassigned to SE3HIn this SOW

GROUP: A- Systems EngineeringManagement Plan

- Site-specific SystemsRequirements Documents

- Systems escriptionDocuments

- Reference Oata Bases

- ConfigurationManagement Plan

- Pre-ACO Waste PackageEngineering studiesReport

- ACD SubsystemRequirements forRepository

- Site characterizationPlan & SemiannualupdatesFinal £9MP & SMMP

Outreach/ParticipationPlanProject PlanProject Management Plan

-CA Plan

GROUP :- Waste Package SCP-COQ- ACO SubsystemRequirements for wastePackageWaste PackagePost-Closure CompilanceStrategy DocumentWaste PackageEnvironment ScenarioDocument

GROUP C:Regional Hydrogic ModelStatus Report

-.Hydrochemical Ota Base- Spent Fuel Rod Consoli-

dation System Study

5.9

Page 3 o 8

TABLE V.2


SCOPE OF WORK/ ANTICIPATED PASE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE

CONTRACTOR NAME CONTRACT NUMBER IN START DATE DELIVERABLES~~~~~~~- __ - - -- -- - - - - - - - __ - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - --______ _____ _ ____________

MAC-Technical Services

Company

Battelle Memorial

Institute

Technical Support Ser-vices to OE-RLO£-AC06-S7RL10840

BWIP Research/TestingDE-AC06-77RL01830

None

None

Kaiser Engineers. Inc./Parsons-BrinckerhoftJoint Venture

8WIP A/t Design ESF and

Repository)DE-AC06-8ORLIoOoo

ESF - None

Repository - at

start of ACO (1990)

- SWIP ESF Title I Design

Report

3WIP SCP-CDR for

Repository

- Pre-ACD Repository

Engineering Studies

Report

Morrison-Knudsen

Company Inc.Construction Manager for

BWtP ESF

DE-AC01-8ORL10343

None

Science Applications

Int'l Inc.Technical & Management

Support Services to

DOE-NVOE-AC0S-83NlOS76

FY 1989Phase-in only of WSelements assigned toSEON in this SOW

- Site CharactertzationPlan and semiannual prog-ress reports.

- Final EMP and SMP

- Outreach/ParticipationPlan

- NNWS1 Project Plan

- NNWSI Project ManagementPlan

- NNWSI QA Plan

Reynolds Electric &Engineering Co.. Inc.

Logistics. maintenance.construction. & drillingsupport for NNWSIDI-ACO8-84V10327

None


(Sandia National Lab.]Performance assessment.systems. repositorydesignSE-AC04-76DP00789

FY 1989 - NNWSI Systems Engineer-

ing Management Plan

- Stte-specific SystemRequirements Document

- System DescriptionDocument

- Reference Data ases

- Configuration ManagementPlan

- Repository SCP-COR- Spent Fuel Rod

Consolidation System

Study Report

Page 4 of 8

TABLE V.2

POTENTIAL TRANSITION OF WORKSCOPE TO SEDM ONTRACTOR

SCOPE OF WORK/ ANTICIPATED PHASE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLECONTRACTOR AME CONTRACT NUMBER in START DATE DELIVERABLES

- Repository SealsMaterials SeleetionReport

- ACO Subsystem Design' Requirements for

Repository- Pre-ACO Repository

Engineering Studies* Report

University of CaliforniaLawrence LivermoreNational Laboratory(UNL)

Waste Package Design andDevelopmentW-740S-ENG-48

FY 190 - WastePackage Designat start of ACO

- Group deliverables aslisted for WestinghouseHanford Co.

- Ceramic LinerFeasibility Report

Fenix Sctsson. Inc.

Holmes & Narver. Inc.

Engineering Support forKNWSI drilling activi-ties/subsurface design(ESF)OE-ACO8-84V10322

Surface Facility DesignSupport for NNWSI (CSF)DE-ACO8-86NV10322

None

lone

University of CaliforniaLos Alamos RationalLaboratory (LANL)

Geochemistry, radionuclideMilration, and in-situtestingW-7405-ENG-36

FY 1989Phase-in only ofWaS elementsassigned to SEOMin this SW

U.S. Department ofInterior GeologicalSurvey

8attelle Memorial

Institute (andFollow-on Awardee)

geologic/hydrologicinvestigations for NNWSIOE-AI-08-78E844S02

Technical ntegratorDE-AC02-83CHlO140(Recompetition n progress)

FY 198IPhase-in only ofWIBS 'elementsassigned to SEOMin this SOW

FY 1989Phase-in only ofWUS elementsassigned to SEOMin this SOW

- Yucca MountainOaternary History

- Natural ResourcesEvaluation

GROUP A:- Systems Engineering

Management Plan- Site-specific Systems

Requireemnts Documents- Systems Description

Documents

S1

Page 5 of 8

TABLE V.2


_ -_ - --- -- - - --- -_ - - - -- -- - ----------- _____---------- ------

SCOPE OF WRX/ ANTICIPATED PHASE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLECONTRACTOR NAME CONTRACT NUMBER IN START DATE DELIVERABLES

____ - -- - - -- -_ - -_ - ----------------------…-…

-Reference Data Bases-Configuration

Management Plan

-Pre-ACO Waste Package

Engineering Studies

Report

-ACO Subsystem

Requireemnts for

Repository

-Site Characterization

Plan Semiannual

updates

-Final EMP & SMMP-Outreach/Participation

Plan-Project Plan-Project Management Plan-QA Plan

GROUP B:

-Waste Package SCP-CDR

-ACO Subsystem

Requirements for Waste

Package-Waste Package

Post-Closure compliance

Strategy Document

-Waste PackageEnvironment Scenario

Document

GROUP C:

-Waste Package ProgramPlan

-Core Sample ManagementPlan

-Geochemistry Test Plan

-Surficial Geologic

Mapping of Deaf SmithStte

-Seismic Survey Report

-Land Access Documentfor ESF

Page 6 of 8

TABLE V.

POTENTIAL TRANSITION OF WORKSCOPE TO SEOM CONTRACTOt

SCOPE OF WORK/ ANTICIPATED PHASE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLECONTRACTOR AME CONTRACT NUMBER IN START DATE DELIVERABLES

_……____________ _ ____________________________ … _ ---- D _ _ ______ --- -- _ -_----

TBD Integration Support

r, I I . I Services (RFP) (for SRP)FY 1989 Phase-in

only of W8S ele-ments assigned toSEOM n this SOW

TeD Field & Technical Ser-vices (RFP) (for SRP)

None

Fluor Engineers & Repository AE DesignConstructors - Advanced DE-AC02-83WM466S6Technology Division

FY 1990 (ACDStart)

- Repository SCP-CDR- Spent Fuel RodConsolidation StudyReport

- Pre-ACO RepositoryEngineering StudiesReport

Parsons-Redpath Exploratory Shaft Facility(ESF) Construction Managerand Operating ContractorDE-AC02-83CH10125

None

Parsons-trinckerhoff/PB-KBB

Roy F. Weston. Inc.

ESF AE DesignOE-AC07-86WH46664

OCRWM Technical SupportServicesDE-ACOI-83NE44301

None - SF Title I DesignReport

FY 1989Phase-in only

of WS elementsassigned to SEOMin this SOW

MONITORED RETRIEVALE STORAGE :

Roy F. Weston. Inc, - OCRWH Technical SupportServices

OE-ACO1-83NE44301*Technical Support forthe Coordination of theNat'l Waste Terminal

I Storage Program*

FY 1989Phase-in only ofWas elementsassigned to SEDMin this SOW

TED

Battelle Pacific NW Labs MRS Technical SupportDE-AC06-77RL01830POperation of PacificNorthwest Nat'l Labs"

None

63

Page 7 of 8

TABLE V.2

POTENTIAL TRANSITION OF WORKSCOPE TO SEOM CNTRACTOR

- … ________-_-________________------------- …------- -___-----… -- …------________-----

SCOPE OF WORK/ ANTICIPATED PHASE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLECONTRACTOR NAME CONTRACT NUMBER IN START DATE DELIVERA8LES

_ _ _- - - - -- ---------- --------- ---------- ----- _-_- --- ______ _____ __ -- - __ - --------------

Ralph . Parsors Architect EngineeringServices

DE-AC6-84RL10436"QAE Services for Con-ceptual and AdvancedConceptual Oesign forProject 360-MonitoredRetrievable StorageFacilityo

None

Roy F. Weston. Inc. OCRVM Techntcal SupportServicesOE-AC0l-S3NE44301OTechnical Support for,the Coordination of theNat'l Waste TerminalStorage Program"

FY 1989Phase-in onlyof WS elementsassigned to SEOMin this SOW

T80

EG&G Idaho. Inc.


Cask DevelopmentD-AC07-761001570Prime Operating Contractorfor the Idaho NationalEngineering Laboratoryu

Cask Development. TechnicalSupport ReviewDE-AC04-76DP00789OSandia National LaboratoryManagement & Operation"

None

None


Transportation OperationsProgram OperationsPlanningDE-ACOS-84R21400"Oak Ridge GaseousDiffusion Plant. OakRidge Nat'l Lab, Y-12Plant, Paducah GaseousDiffusion Plant.Management Operation"

FY 1989Phase-in only ofWBS elementsassigned to SEOM4in this SOW

Page 8 of 8

TABLE V.2

POTENTIAL TRANSITION OF WORKSCOPE TO SEDM CONTRACTOR

SCOPE OF WORK/ ANTICIPATED PHASE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLECONTRACTOR NAME. CONTRACT NUMBER IN START ATE OELIVERABLES

______~~~~~~~~~~~- - - - - - - - _ _-_- -___- -___________-_____-____-__________


institutional Planning Analysis ManagementIntegrationDE-AC01-83CH10139"Crystalline Rock Project"

FY 199Phase-in only ofWBS elementsassigned to SEDM nthis SOW

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:

Roy F. Weston. Inc.



OCRSW Technical SupportServicesOE-ACO-83HE44301"Technical Support for theCoordination of Nat'l WasteTerminal Storage Program"

Waste Systems Data &Development ProgramDE-ACOS-840R21400'Oak Ridge Nat'l Lab. it 1.Management & Operation'

Waste System IntegrationSupportDE-AC06-77RL01430'Pacific Northwest Labora-tory Operating & ManagementContract,

FY 1989Phase-in only ofVM3S elementsassigned to SEOMin this SOW

FY 1989Phase-in only ofWS elementsassigned to SEOMin this SOW

FY 1989Phase-in only ofW8S elementsassigned to SOMin this SOW

C 5

APPENDIX A

- ACROJYMS -

ACD Advanced Conceptual Design

BUL Brookhaven ational Laboratory

DWIP Basalt Waste Isolation Project

CC3 Change Control Board

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

OH DOE-Chicago Operations Office

C/SCSC Cost/Schedule Control Systen Criteria

DOE U.S. Department of Energy

EIS Environmental Impact Statenent

EtIMP Environmental onitoring and Mitigation Plan

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

'S. Exploratory Shaft Facility

FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation

FPC Final Procurement and Construction (Design)

HLW High-Level Waste

HQ Headquarters

ID DOE-Idaho Operations Office

IMS Information Management System

LA License Application

LAD License Application Design

LM Licensing Procedure Manual

LSS Licensing Support System

rIGDS Mined Geologic Disposal System

[IRS kiontored Retrievable Storage

III'.JSI tevada tiuclear Waste Storage Investigations

HIRC U.S. Iluclear Regulatory Commission

I-Y DOE-Nevada Operations Office

NWPA Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425)

OCRWMt DOE-Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management

OGR DOE-Office of Geologic Repositories (within OCRI)y.

OR DOE-Oak Ridge Operations Office

?MP Project llanagement Plan

PtIL Pacific Northwest Laboratory

QA Quality Assurance

QAP Quality Assurance Plan -7

RL OOE-Richland Operations Office

SCP Site Characterization Plan

SCP-COR Sit3 Characterization Plan-Conceptual Design Rport

SE0r1 Systems Engineering, Development, and Management

SEMP Systems Engineering Managment Plan

S14P Socfoeconomic Monitoring and Mitigation Plan

Soil Statement of Work

SRP Salt Repository Project

TBD To Be Detenmined

W8S Work Breakdown Structure

'I7

APPENDIX

- REFERENCES -

1. U.S. DOE, OCRWI1 Program anagement System ManualJanuary 1986(DOE/RW-0043)

2. U.S. DOE, OCRWIl Draft Mission Plan AmendmentJanuary 1987(DOE/RW-0128)

3. U.S. DOE, ORCWt1 Monitored Retrievable StorageSubmission to Congresslarch 1987(DOE/RW-0035/1-Rev.1)

4. U.S. DOE Order 4700.1, March 6, 1987, "Project fanagenent Systei"

5. U.S. DOE, OCRWiOffice of Ceologic Repositories Work Breakdown Structureand Dictionary - Development and Evaluation Phase(OGR/B-4), November 1984

6. U.S. DOE, OCRWII Office of Geologic Repositories - Program BaselineProcedure otebook (OGR/B-1) June 1986(DOE/RW-00G3)

7. U.S. DOE, OCRWfI1Generic Requirements for a Mined Geologic Disposal System(OGR/B-2), June 1986(DOE/RW-0090)

8. U.S. DOEMeorandum, dated July 8, 1985Subject: Establishment of Waste Acceptance Process and asteAcceptance Committee

9. U.S. DOE Solicitation DE-RP01-87RW0084,"Design and Implementation of a Licensing Support Systen"

10. U.S. DOE, OCRIRI Mission Plan(Volume I, Part I, Chapter 4)June, 1985(DOE/R'W-0005)

11. U.S. DOE OCRWMSystems Engineering Management Plan, October 1985(DOE/RW-0051)

* a

12. U.S. DOE, OCRW1ISystems Engineering Ilanagement Plan for the Office of GeologicRepositories (OGR/0-7), October 1985

13. U.S. DOE Order DOE 5700.68, September 23, 19860 "Quality Assurance"

14. U.S. OE, OCRUMQuality Assurance Management Policies and Requirements,(DOE/RW-0032)

15. U.S. DOE, OCRWMOffice of Geologic Repositories, Quality Assurance PlanRadioactive Waste Repositories(OGR/B-3) August 1986(CDOE/RW-0095)

October 1985

for High-Level

16. U.S. NRC, Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 60, Code of FederalRegulations-Energy, "Disposal of High Level Radioactive Waste in G0logizRepositories"

17. U.S. RC, Title 10,Regulations-Energy,

18. U.S. RC, Title 10,Regulations-Energy,Material'

Chapter 1, Part 50, Appendix 0, Code of Federal"Quality Assurance Criteria for uclear Power Plants"

Chapter 1, Part 71, Code of Federal"Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive

19. U.S. NRC, Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 72, Code of FederalRegulation-Energy, "Licensing Requirements for the Storage of Snant Fuelin an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ISFSI)"

20. American National Standards Institute/American Society of echanicalEngineers, Nuclear Quality Assurance-1, "Quality Assurance ProgramRequirements for Nuclear Facilities"

21. U.S. NRC Review Plan: Quality Assurance Programs for SiteCharacterization of High Level Nuclear Waste Repositories, June 1984

,,

APPENJDIX C

- ttAJOR DELIVERA3-S -

DESCRIPTION WBS DUE DELIVERABLEOF NJUMBER DATE APPROVED BY

DELIVERABLE

Site-Specific System 1.X FY 1992 DOE-HQRequirements Documents - Update

Site-Specific System 1.X 1992 DOE-HQDescription Docunents - Update

ACD Performance Assessment 1.X 1991 T30Report

LAD Performance AssessmentReport 1.X 1994 T30

Performance Assessment System 1.X 1992 DOE-HIQModel Validation Report

Waste Package riaterials 1.X.02 1990 30c-HQRecommendation Report for ACD

Waste Package aterials 1.X.02 1992 DOE-HQRecommendation Report for LAD

Waste Package Container 1.X.02 1990 DOE-HQDesign/Construction Standard

Advanced Coniceptual Design 1.X.02 1992 DOE-IQReport - Waste Package

LAD Subsystems Design 1.X.02 1992 DOE-'-IQRequirenents for Waste Package

License Application esign 1.X.02 1994 DOE-HQReport for Waste Package

Unsaturated Zone odeling 1.2.02 1993 T30Evaluation Report - Tuff

Groundwater ttodeling Report 1.1.03 1992 T3Dfor Draft EIS - BWIP

0

Groundwater llodeling Report - 1.3.03 1993 TBDSalt

Groundwater flodeling Report 1.2.03 1993 T3Dfor raft EIS - Tuff

Seals Materials Selection 1.X.04 1990 TBDReports for ACD

Seals aterials Selection 1.X.04 1991 TBDReports for LAD

Advanced Conceptual Design 1.X.04 1992 DOE-HQReport - Repository

LAD Subsystem Requirements for i.X.04 1992 DOE-HQRepository

License Application Design 1.X.04 1994 DOE-IIQReport for Repository andSeals

Title III Inspection Reports 1.X.04 ---- -----

Semi-annual SCP Progress Reports 1.X.05 1989 + DOE-HQ

Evaluation Report of 1.X.O5 1989 DOE-HQsite-specific characterizationprograms

Safety Analysis Report 1.X.O5 1994 DOE-HQ

Site Selection Report 1.X.05 1995 DOE-HQ

In-situ (ESF) Testing Data and 1.X.05 1994 DOE-HQAnalysis Report for LA

Project Plan -- 1989 DOE-IQ

Project Management Plan -- 1989 DOE-HQ

Cost Plans -- Annual DOE-HQ

QA Plan -- 1989 DOE-HQ

Systems Engineering Management -- 1989 DOE-HQPlan

Business, Project, and -- 1989 DOE-HQTechnical tlanagenientProcedures

Repository Licensing Topical. 1.X.05 TD DOE-HQReport(s)

7 2 U.S.GOVERNMNT PRIMUNG CrfICE098?-i8l-l64sOO99

PRESOLICITATIONPRESENTATION PACKAGE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYOFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT CONTRACTORFOR THE NUCLEAR WASTE ANAGEMENT SYSTEM

JUNE 16, 1987

9 #'k Vall a

IC

THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYr v .

FCIRA 3(

MARThA 0 KISSE

5AANALYSISSCOT L AMPSILLI

SECRETARYJOnM S. HERITO

DEPUTY SECRETARYWILLIAM F. MARTIN

UNDER SECRETARYJOSUP P. SALGAOO

-_ '

OEfl Of_ MINORITY ECONOMIC IMPACT

RAYMOfD MASAL9 IRECTOR

OFCE OFSALU AND MSAOVANTACED

_ BUSINESS UIUZATION* IflU MAwn irlmAt.

=

_ _ OFF" OFIHEARINGS AND APPEALS

0(0301 StINAY

J. MI(3*ft FARRELL. 1 Ia

INSPECTOR

JO"l C. LAYTON

IAMGV1TAND AOIISTRATPON

LAWREmcE F DAVENOh

BOARD OFCONTRACT APPEALSBARMAV VAN D031W

ASSISTANT SC"TAF.CONGESSNL.

I PfEGOYERNENTAL APULIC AFFAIRS

5TIECoomJ ARS_ _____________ U u r n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ll q m

I I I I I IASSSTANT SECETARY. ASSISTANT SECRITAft. ASSISTANT MNtETARY.

NUCLAR ENEY [ FOSSIL o I CONSErNATIO a

A DAVID flOS JAMES A. WAMIER ONA P. FfT*PATRICW

ASSTANT SE TARY. IASSISTANT SECRETA". ASSISTANT SECRETARY.MENSU PROGRAMS I ENIROMWENT. 5IfflINAW AFFAIRS

SA.P!T A HEALTH E E ENCES

SYf STER i POLE. i. MANY . WALKER DAVID 1 WAL

a U - -U

UM M

ECONOWC NOIfNATOW ENERY ilFORMATIONADMIN"ISTRATIO ADUINISTRATIONI MA0"IA A TAUNTON W"ILIWT A. UIRMLII

Klmmlaz--ulwU

offf.llIENEMGY FRSIAROPIJAMES P. DOLER I

1ACIIG)

_______________ U �b

I* OmEIvLLE POWER

ADMISTRATION

* WESTERN AREA POWERADMINISTRATION

I

OPERATIONS OFFICES* AWtOUEIM S OAK RGE

* CHICAGO * RCHLANO* IDA"O * SAN FRANCISCO* N"VADA * SAVANNAN RIVER

may Its?

MA51734T.004

OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVEWASTE MANAGEMENT

o FBPC OF rI DECTORBE"C. ftUSe. Omclo

C"IAUS I. KAY.DPTY owiCTOI

One" Of POLICY.AND OUMTREACIO Al. CTOR

JEROME SALTZMANDEPUTY DIRCTOR

POLIC ANIftylINFORMATION

fLAiNDO SERVICES DIVsOJ. BENNETT EASTERILN GINGER KING DIRCTOR

DIRECTOR

OPPC F OFCE OF Of orr OFOOt.oGC RKOSITOWES STORAGE AND RESOURCE MANAGIMENT

SSOCATE DIRCTOR TRAWSPATION SYSTEMPS

Db. SCS. A~O SSOIAE O"cToo AS_ IT ^s^ CTOR

COORtoIArO DIVISION _ STOR ANO ANALYTICALet KLIN DIRE CTOR _IANmA DVANA N

JAMES 1M11 f. RWCTOONALD MIE AIRCTOR

nO"fCON AUO _ TRANSPORTATION AND MANAGEENS T SYSTEMS OET cHoy.O DIV. " ASTE SYSTEMS Dam. AND SUPMR DI.3

"ALP" g . CTOR

SITING. LICENSINGAND GUALITY

ASSIUA"C! NV.JAMES P PRIONT.

DIRECTOR

LAKE BA TT."DRCTOR lAMOD BRANDY. OftCTOR

WNORMATK RESOUS

DIVO2AROAPA Clip DCTOR

MA51734T.008

r

FY 1988 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGETNUCLEAR WASTE FUND

($ IN THOUSANDS)

FY 1987APPROP.

FY 1988REQUEST

NUCLEAR WASTE FUND

REPOSITORY DEVELOPMENT* FIRST REPOSITORY* SECOND REPOSITORY

MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE

TRANSPORTATION AND SYSTEMSINTEGRATION

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ANDTECHNICAL SUPPORT

TOTALLESS

$307,44619,800

20,000

26,000

46,75479,000

$499,000

$525,04424,000

58,000

63,043

54,913

$725,000225,000

$500,000MA51734T.089

FY 1988 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET REQUEST

a),

RFP SCHEDULE

* SOLICITATION ISSUED

* PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE

* RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

* CONTRACTOR SELECTION

AUGUST 1987

SEPTEMBER 1987

NOVEMBER 1987

MAY 1988

MA5 1 734T.092

'e

OCRWM RFP READING ROOMS

* DOE PUBLIC READING ROOMS WILL BE UTILIZEDTO PROVIDE POTENTIAL BIDDERS AND MEMBERS OFTHE PUBLIC WITH OCRWM PROGRAM INFORMATIONDEEMED RELEVANT TO THIS RFP

* READING ROOM MATERIAL WILL BE AVAILABLE ATDOE READING ROOM SITES IN MICROFICHE FORM.IN ADDITION, HARD COPY FORM WILL BE AVAILABLEFOR VIEWING AT THE SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC READINGROOM, THE SERI AREA OFFICE IN GOLDEN, COLORADOAND AT THE DOE HEADQUARTERS PUBLIC READING ROOM

* MICROFICHE COPIES OF THE OCRWM READING ROOMMATERIAL WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR SALE TOINTERESTED PARTIES

MA51734T.090

ii

2* READING ROOMS WILL REMAIN OPEN UNTIL THE RFP CLOSES

* READING ROOM CONTENTS WILL REMAIN FIXED WITHTHE EXCEPTION OF A ONE-TIME UPDATE APPROXIMATELYONE MONTH AFTER THE RFP IS RELEASED

* YOUR HANDOUT CONTAINS

- THE INVENTORY LISTING OF THE OCRWM READINGROOM MATERIAL

- A LIST OF READING ROOM LOCATIONS

- A POINT OF CONTACT FOR EACH READING ROOM

- INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PURCHASE OFMICROFICHE COPIES OF THE COMPLETE OCRWM READINGROOM MATERIAL

MA51734T.091

NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENTPROGRAM

J. ROGER HILLEY

ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR FORSTORAGE AND TRANSPORTATIONSYSTEMS


MA51734T.013

.

NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT OF 1982

* TO SITE, LICENSE, CONSTRUCT AND OPERATEREPOSITORIES FOR THE DISPOSAL OF HIGH-LEVELRADIOACTIVE WASTE

* TO ESTABLISH THE NUCLEAR WASTE FUND SO THATOWNERS AND GENERATORS OF WASTE WILL PAY THECOST OF PROGRAM

* TO DEFINE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FEDERALGOVERNMENT AND STATES AND INDIAN TRIBES

* TO PROVIDE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF FEDERAL INTERIMSTORAGE CAPABILITY

* TO STUDY THE NEED FOR AND FEASIBILITY OFMONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE

MA51734T.014

NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMPOLICY GOALS

* THE PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ANDENVIRONMENTAL ACCEPTABILITY ARE OF PARAMOUNTIMPORTANCE

* THE PROGRAM MUST BE CREDIBLE TO THE PUBLIC BYVIRTUE OF ITS INTEGRITY AND TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE

* THE PROGRAM MUST NEITHER SUBSIDIZE NOR PENALIZENUCLEAR POWER AS AN ENERGY SOURCE

* THE PROGRAM MUST BE CONDUCTED IN A COST-EFFECTIVEMANNER, WITH FULL COST RECOVERY

MA51734T.012

I .

.

b

U.S. TOTAL NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL DISCHARGES1960-2020

THOUSAND METRIC TONS OF INITIAL HEAVY METAL150

125

100 UPPER REFERENCE - -

75

50 NO NEW

ORDERS

25

01960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

MA51734T.024

I

THE WASTE-DISPOSAL SYSTEM CURRENTLYAUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMSPENT FUEL GEOLOGICREPOSITORIES

II

PI

FEDERAL INTERIMSTORAGE

(IF REQUIRED)

COMMERCIAL ANDDEFENSE HIGH-LEVEL

RADIOACTIVEWASTE

MAS 1 734T.025

THE IMPROVED-PERFORMANCE WASTE-MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH AN INTEGRAL

MRS FACILITY

FIRSTGEOLOGIC

REPOSITORY

SPENT FUEL

I

I

MONITOREDRETRIEVABLE

STORAGE(IF APPROVEDBY CONGRESS)

TRANSPORTATION

IJr

FEDERALINTERIM

STORAGE(IF REQUIRED)

DEFENSEHIGH-LEVEL

WASTE

IIIIL

SECONDGEOLOGIC

REPOSITORY- - (IF CONSTRUCTION

IS AUTHORIZEDBY CONGRESS)

MA5 1734T.026

o &

Distribution of Waste Management Functions in aSystem With an Integrated MRS Facility

Reactors* Storage Until Waste System

Begins Operation* Packaging for Transport

to MRS* Federal Acceptance

,' I!

Repository* Emplacemente Long-Term Containment

MRS Facility* Managing At-Reactor SF Acceptance* Scheduling and Controlling Transport to MRS* SF Receipt, Inspection and Accounting* Consolidation, Packaging and Conditioning for Disposal* Monitored, Retrievable Storage* Controlling Transport to Repository* Special Packaging, Repair and Testing

4

OFFICE OF STORAGE ANDTRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

* MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE

* TRANSPORTATION

* SYSTEMS INTEGRATION

MA51734T.015

A

_________ 4 A~iLiob s.,

71~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I p~~~~~~-

i.*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P

v wI&

-L

IR6a

* 1 pt *.

*.% -*

I ..| . .^ @

is 41 ...

* * S

* *x

. - A .

E.

*� 4.,

IIW U~~I. .. *

. _ ~ . .-..

A.

.4

4

PRINCIPLE APPLICABLE NRC REGULATIONSFOR MRS

* 10 CFR 72 LICENSING REQUIREMENTSINDEPENDENT SPENT FUELINSTALLATION

FOR THESTORAGE

* 10 CFR 50

* 10 CFR 20

* 10 CFR 73

FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE

FOR RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY

FOR SECURITY AND SAFEGUARDS

MA51734T.01 6

4

Principal Design Criteria

* Minimum receipt and shipment rates* In-building lag storage capacity* Sealed storage cask capacity* Capable of consolidating SF rods and

hardware into storage canisters* Provide space for adding repository

overpack* Handle PWR (60 wt%) and BWR

(40 wt%)* Receive shipments by rail (70 wt%) and

truck (30 wt%)* Burnup of SF - PWR (nominal)

- BWR (nominal)* Age of SF (nominal)* Minimum age of SF

2500 MTU/yr1 000 MTUI 5,000 MTU

33,000 MWd/MTU28,000 MWd/MTU1 0 years5 years

'I

MRS PROPOSALSUBMITTED ON MARCH 31, 1987DOE PROPOSES THAT CONGRESS

* APPROVE CONSTRUCTION AT THE CLINCH RIVER SITEAT OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE

* LIMIT STORAGE TO 15,000 MTU OF SPENTNUCLEAR FUEL

* PRECLUDE ACCEPTANCE OF SPENT FUEL UNTIL NRCAUTHORIZES CONSTRUCTION OF REPOSITORY

* DIRECT DOE TO IMPLEMENT MEASURES RESPONSIVETO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE AND LOCALGOVERNMENTS

* DIRECT DOE TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM PLAN INTHE PROPOSAL MA51734T.017

4

MRS Proposal (cont'd)

Financial Assistance

* Annual assistance- Mitigation of impacts after congressional approval- Payments equivalent to taxes after construction

* Encourage diversification of local industry

* Reimbursement of direct expenses

* Use of local suppliers

* Consider excess land for industrial development

fr

I.

MRS Proposal (cont'd)

Institutional Provisions

* Consultation and cooperation agreement

* Financial assistance

* State and local involvement

*

MRS DEPLOYMENT SCHEDULE

- CONGRESSIONALAPPROVAL

APPLICATION FORNRC LICENSE

EIS ISSUED/NRC LICENSE ISSUED

X OPERATION*

PROGRAM LENGTH

45 YEARS

OPERATIONENDS

p p

I 1 I I 1 I I III1 I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I IYR 1 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 3;

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION DECSHIPMENT OF SPENT FUEL TO MRS CONTINGENT UPONRECEIPT OF THE REPOSITORY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION.

2 36 40 45COMMISSIONING

MA51734T.023

.11 ~4

ESTIMATED LIFE CYCLE COSTS OF MRS

COST ELEMENTCONSTANT 1986 DOLLARS

(MILLIONS)

ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIONSDESIGNREGULATORY COMPLIANCE'CONSTRUCTIONTRAINING AND TESTINGOPERATIONDECOMMISSIONINGINSTITUTIONAL INTERACTIONSPROGRAM MANAGEMENTTOTAL MRS FACILITY

5.598.828.4

655.062.8

2218.183.0

2.270.8

3224.5

MA51734T.018

TRANSPORTATION ASPECTS OF NWPA

* DOE RESPONSIBLE

* DOE TAKES TITLE TO FUEL

* MAXIMUM USE OF INDUSTRY

* NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

CERTIFIES CASKS

* WASTE FUND PAYS FOR TRANSPORT

MA5 1 734T.009

4:

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

U ttexlfteOStt -

\~~~~~ t"Otoelf-

L't I

Dr oct

MAS 173 4 T.0 0 6

DUAL ELEMENTS OF OCRWMTRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

* TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE SYSTEM

* DEVELOPMENT OF SUPPORTIVE INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT

- FOCUS ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL, INDUSTRY AND THE

UTILITIES, AND THE PUBLIC

- INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK

- ISSUE IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION

MAS 1 734T.007

.

A

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AQUISON

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I I _ _ _ _I PHASE I -

CASKDEVELOPMENT I PHASE 11

TRANSPORTOPERATIONS I

- V

INmATIVE IFROM-REACTOR

CASKS

INMATIVE 2FROM-MRS-TO

REPOSITORY CASKS(SUBJECT TO

CONGRESSIONALAPPROVAL)

SERVICE -

CONTRACTORS

INDEPENDENTOVERVIEW,

INSPECTION,AND QUALITYASSURANCE

CONTRACTORS

INITIATIVE 3.NONSTANDARD SPENT

FUEL ANDCOMPONENTS CASKS

INmATIVE 4DEFENSE HIGH-

EVEL WASTE CASKS MA51734T.022

9, 1

NWPA SHIPMENT ESTIMATES

* '-5 SHIPMENTS PER DAY

* 500 TO 2000 PER YEAR

* VARIABLE BECAUSE OF- CASK DESIGN

* m RAIL AND TRUCK USAGE?- TYPE OF RAIL SERVICE- ACCEPTANCE RATES

MA5 1734T.010

l

TRANSPORTATION ISSUES-* HIGHWAY ROUTING* RAIL ROUTING* PRENOTIFICATION* PHYSICAL PROTECTION PROCEDURES* INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT/HIGHWAY AND RAIL* EMERGENCY RESPONSE* LIABILITY COVERAGE FOR TRANSPORTATION TO NWPA FACILITIESA CASK DESIGN AND TESTING* OVERWEIGHT TRUCK SHIPMENTS* RAIL SERVICE ANALYSIS* MIXTURE OF TRANSPORTATION MODES* INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS* OCRWM TRAINING STANDARDS* TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES* STATE, TRIBAL, AND LOCAL REGULATION OF TRANSPORTATION* TRANSPORTATION OF DEFENSE WASTE MA51734T.OO1

I

I

SYSTEMS INTEGRATION

MA51734T.019

I.,

0 p.

.

WASTECHARACTERISTICSAND INVENTORIES

SYSTEMDEFINON

OPERATIONSSCENARIOS ANDASSUMPTIONS

ECONOMIC ANDINSTITUTIONAL

FACTORS-

/SYSTEM ANALYSIS

w U Y

WASTESTREAM

ANALYSIS

OPERATIONS/LOGISTICSANALYSIS

COSTANALYSIS

RELIABILITYAVAILABILITY

MAINTAINABILITY

RISKANALYSIS

p

I SYSTEM INTEGRATION REPORTS I.__ ._ _

MA51734T.020

4

MAJOR TECHNICAL BASELINE DUCOMENTS OF THE PROGRAM

NMI

a. 0"0 va. ODM"*= W~SS6M POWNCV MASt734T.021

S.

I

GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY PROGRAM

STEPHEN H. KALEASSOCIATE DIRECTOROFFICE OF GEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES

JUNE 16, 1987

MA51734T.027

BRIEFING OUTLINE

1. PROGRAM OBJECTIVE AND MAJOR ACTIVITIESMANDATED BY THE NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT

2. PROGRAM PHASES AND SCHEDULE

3. ORGANIZATION

4. INSTITUTIONAL PROGRAM

5. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

6. QUALITY ASSURANCE

7. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS

8. MAJOR TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

9. SECOND REPOSITORYMA5 1 734T.028

4-

1. OBJECTIVE

TO PROVIDE FACILITIES FOR THE PERMANENT DISPOSALOF SPENT FUEL AND HIGH-LEVEL WASTE IN A MANNER

THAT PROTECTS THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND

THAT IS ENVIRONMENTALLY ACCEPTABLE

MA51734T.029

I.,

MAJOR ACTIVITIES MANDATED BY THENUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT OF 1982

* IDENTIFY POTENTIALLY ACCEPTABLE SITES FOR THEFIRST REPOSITORY

* ESTABLISH SITING GUIDELINES

* PREPARE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS ANDNOMINATE AT LEAST FIVE SITES FOR CHARACTERIZATION

* RECOMMENDED THREE SITES FOR CHARACTERIZATION

* PERFORM. SITE CHARACTERIZATION

* SELECT FIRST REPOSITORY SITE

* CONSTRUCT FIRST REPOSITORY

* SELECT SECOND REPOSITORY SITE

* CONSULT AND COOPERATE WITH AFFECTED STATES ANDINDIAN TRIBES

* PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO AFFECTED STATESAND INDIAN TRIBES MA51734T.030

Wf,

AND SCHEDULE

MA5 1734T.03 1

MAJOR PHASES OF GEOLOGICREPOSITORY PROGRAM

RECOMMEND3 SITES

v

SELECT REPOSITORYSITEV

II

PHASE I IPHASE 2 I PHASE 3

1SITESCREENING NOMINATION/

SITE

I PHASE 4 1

l lI 1

LIUCENSE EVIWa

PHASE 5

NATIONAL SCREENINGREGIONAL SCREENING

SITESELECTION

IDENTIFY POTENTIALLYACCEPTABLE SITES

ESTABLISHED SITINGGUIDELINES

III

rAL,

I

IIIII

IIII

CONSTRUCTON

OPERATIONS

r COSUE

U ~~LICENSEI TERMINATION /

IISSUE ENVIRONMENI

ASSESSMENTS

n_-

MA51734T.067

STATUS OF FIRST REPOSITORY SITES

* NOMINATED AND RECOMMENDED* NOMINATED ONLY

A NOT NOMINATEDMA51734T.0 1I

t

aP

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

* PROJECT TITLES AND LOCATIONS1. BASALT WASTE ISOLATION PROJECT - BWIP2. NEVADA NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE

INVESTIGATIONS PROJECT - NNWSI3. SALT REPOSITORY PROJECT - SRP

- RICHLAND, WASHINGTON

- LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

- COLUMBUS, OHIO ANDDEAF SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

- BASALT

- TUFF

- SALT

MA51734T.032

FIRST REPOSITORY PROGRAM SCHEDULE

ISSUE SITECHARACTERIZATION PLAN

START EXPLORATORY SHAFTCONSTRUCTION

START IN-SITU TESTING

NNWSITUFF

THIRD QUARTER 1987

FOURTH QUARTER 1988

SECOND QUARTER 1990

BWIPBASALT

FOURTH QUARTER 1987

SECOND QUARTER 1989

FOURTH QUARTER 1991

SRPSALT

FIRST QUARTER 1988

FOURTH QUARTER 1989

FOURTH QUARTER 1991

MA51734T.033

I

FIRST REPOSITORY PROGRAM SCHEDULE(CONT'D)

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT STATEMENT

FINAL ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT STATEMENT

SUBMITTAL OF SITE-SELECTION REPORTTO THE PRESIDENT

SUBMITTAL OF LICENSE APPLICATIONTO THE NRC

RECEIPT OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONFROM THE NRC

START OF CONSTRUCTION

START OF PHASE I OPERATIONS

START OF PHASE II OPERATIONS

FOURTH QUARTER 1993

FOURTH QUARTER 1994

FOURTH QUARTER 1994

FIRST QUARTER 1995

FIRST QUARTER 1998

FIRST QUARTER 1998

FIRST QUARTER 2003

SECOND QUARTER 2006

MA5 1 734T.034

. I

3. ORGANIZATION~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 I

MA5 1 734T.035

.


MA51734T.07 1

PROGRAMMATIC RELATIONSHIPS

OFFICE OF GEOLOGICREPOSITORIES

r -- --- - o - - _-a a

NEVADAOPERATIONS

OFFICE

II

RICHLANDOPERATIONS

OFFICE

I. I

s

CHICAGOOPERATIONS

OFFICE

II

-

NEVADA NULCEARWASTE STORAGEINVESTIGATIONS

.PROJECT(NNWSI)

BASALT WASTEISOLATIONPROJECT

(BWIP)

SALT REPOSITORYPROJECT

(SRP)

MAS1734T.072

II

FIELD PROJECT OFFICES ANDPROJECT CONTRACTORS

BWIP (BASALT) I I7 NNWSI (TIIFF) I I SRP (SALT)I

J ROCKWELL/WESTINGHOUSE I

* INTEGRATION* TECH & MGT SUPPORT* GEOLOGY* WASTE PACKAGE

IKAISER/PARSONSBRINKERHOFF/QUADE & DOUGLAS

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS* INTEGRATION* TECH & MGT SUPPORTU.S. GEOLOGICAL SURV

* GEOLOGY

t SANDIA*REPOSITORY DEVELOPMENT

* EXPLORATORY SHAFT DESIGN* REPOSITORY-DEVELOPMENT

4 MORRISON-KNUDSEN |

* EXPLORATORY SHAFTCONSTRUCTION

M MACTEC

* PROJECT MANAGEMENTSERVICES

* QUALITY ASSURANCE

* IN TRANSITION

i LAWRENCE LIVERMORE I

BATTELLE

* INTEGRATION

(TO BE DETERMINED)

* TECH & FIELD SERVICES* GEOLOGY* WASTE PACKAGE

PARSONSBRINKERHOFF/PBKBB* EXPLORATORY SHAFT DESIGNFLUOR

* REPOSITORY DEVELOPMENT

PARSONS REDPATH |*EXPLORATORY SHAFT

CONSTRUCTION

*WASTE PACKAGE

4 LOS ALAMOS |*EXPLORATORY SHAFT

TESTINGNEVADA ON-SITE

ICONTRACTORSI* EXPLORATORY SHAFT

DESIGN*EXPLORATORY SHAFT

CONSTRUCTION

MA51734T.073

1 4

4. INSTITUTIONAL PROGRAM

* NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT ESTABLISHES REQUIREMENTSFOR INSTITUTIONAL INTERACTIONS

* STATE, INDIAN TRIBE, AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INTHE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF REPOSITORIES ISESSENTIAL TO PROMOTE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THESAFETY AND DISPOSAL OF HIGH-LEVEL WASTE ANDSPENT FUEL

MA51734T.036

9. .4

INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITIES

* STATE/INDIAN TRIBE INTERACTIONS

- DESK OFFICER SYSTEM

- COORDINATING GROUP MEETINGS

- SENIOR POLICY MEETINGS WITH STATES AND INDIAN TRIBES

- FULL PARTICIPATION AT NRC MEETINGS

* SECTION 117 (C) CONSULTATION AND COOPERATION

NEGOTIATIONS UNDERWAY

* EXTENSIVE INTERACTIONS OCCURRING WITHOUT FORMAL

AGREEMENTS

* FACILITY SPECIFIC OUTREACH AND PARTICIPATION PLANS

MA51734T.037

di

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

* PROVIDE FOR OVERSIGHT IF PROGRAM ACTIVITIES BYSTATES AND INDIAN TRIBES THROUGH A COMPREHENSIVEPROGRAM OF GRANTS

* $58 MILLION GRANTED TO DATE

* PROVIDE REVENUES TO STATES AND UNITS OF GENERALLOCAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH PAYMENTS EQUIVALENTTO TAXES

MA5 1 734T.038

.nI

S 4

5. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DISPOSALOF HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE

* ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT ANDDISPOSAL OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL ANDAND TRANSURANIC WASTES (EPA STANDARD, 40 CFR PART 191)

* DISPOSAL OF HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES INGEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES (NRC RULE, 10 CFR PART 60)

* GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE RECOMMENDATION OF SITESFOR THE NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORIES: FINAL SITINGGUIDELINES (DOE GUIDELINES, 10 CFR PART 960)

MA1734T.039

4 4.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE STANDARDEPA GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL

STANDARD - 40 CFR 191

DURING OPERATION

* 25 MREM/YR TO MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL

POST CLOSURE

* LIMITS ON TOTAL QUANTITY OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALRELEASED TO ACCESSIBLE ENVIRONMENT FOR 10,000 YEARS

* 25 MREM/YR TO MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL FOR 1,000 YEARS

* LIMITS RADIONUCLIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATERFOR 1 ,000 YEARS

MA51734T.040

.*

I

SUMMARY OF NRC PERFORMANCE CRITERIAFOR CONTAINMENT/ISOLATION -

10 CFR 60

* RELEASE TO THE ACCESSIBLE ENVIRONMENT SHALL BELESS THAN THE LIMITS SPECIFIED BY EPA

* WASTE PACKAGE TO PROVIDE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETECONTAINMENT OF RADIONUCLIDE FOR 300-1000 YEARS

* ENGINEERED SYSTEM TO MEET ANNUAL RELEASE RATELIMIT OF 10 PPM OF RADIONUCLIDE INVENTORY AT1000 YEARS

* 1000 YR. GROUNDWATER TRAVEL TIME TO ACCESSIBLEENVIRONMENT

MA51734T.041

q

GENERAL SITING GUIDELINES - 10 CFR 960* GUIDELINES TO CONSIDER FACTORS PERTAINING TO:

- NATURAL RESOURCES- HYDROLOGY- GEOPHYSICS- SEISMIC ACTIVITY- DEFENSE ACTIVITIES- WATER SUPPLIES- POPULATIONS.- WATER USER RIGHTS- PROXIMITY TO NATIONAL PARKS, ETC.

* GUIDELINES TO CONSIDER PROXIMITY TO SITES FOR STORAGEOR GENERATION OF SPENT FUEL WASTES

* GUIDELINES TO CONSIDER TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETYFACTORS IN MOVING WASTE TO REPOSITORY

* GUIDELINES TO SPECIFY POPULATION FACTORS TO DISQUALIFY SITE

* GUIDELINES TO REQUIRE SECRETARY TO CONSIDER- COST IMPACT OF TRANSPORTING WASTE- ADVANTAGE OF REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION IN SITING- VARIOUS GEOLOGIC MEDIA MA51734T.042

MAJOR REGULATORY ACTIVITIES

* CONDUCT INTENSIFIED INTERACTIONS WITH THENUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

* CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIOECONOMICDURING SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND MITIGATESIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS

MONITORING

* CONDUCT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS THATMEET LICENSING REQUIREMENTS

* MANAGE INFORMATION NEEDED FOR LICENSING

* SCOPE AND PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

* PREPARE LICENSE APPLICATION

MA51734T.043

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY

* ACHIEVE AND ASSURE MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICALEXCELLENCE IN ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROGRAM

* PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND THEENVIRONMENT

* COMPLY WITH LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORYREQUIREMENTS

* DEMONSTRATE ADEQUATE QUALITY IN PERSONNEL,ACTIVITIES, AND DATA

MA51734T.044

OGR QA PROGRAMGOVERNING DOCUMENTS

NRC

* 10 CFR 60, SUBPART G

* 1CFR 50, APPENDIX B

* NRC REVIEW PLAN - QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMSCHARACTERIZATION OF HIGH LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE

FOR SITEREPOSITORIES

NATIONAL CONSENSUS STANDARD

* ANSI/ASME NQA-1, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTSFOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES

MA51734T.045

4.

10 CFR 60, "DISPOSAL OF HIGH LEVEL RADIOACTIVEWASTES IN GEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES"

REQUIRES DOE TO IMPLEMENT A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM BASEDON THE CRITERIA OF APPENDIX B OF 10 CFR PART 50, "QUALITYASSURANCE CRITERIA FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" - AS APPLICABLE

APPENDIX B TO 10 CFR PART 50

ESTABLISHES QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) REQUIREMENTSFOR THE DISIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION OFTHOSE STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS OFNUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND FUEL REPROCESSINGPLANTS ESSENTIAL TO THE PREVENTION OR MITIGATION OFTHE CONSEQUENCES OF POSTULATED ACCIDENTS THATCOULD CAUSE UNDUE RISK TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETYOF THE PUBLIC

NRC REVIEW PLANDEFINES CRITERIA & METHODS NRC USES TO REVIEW DOEQA PROGRAM FOR SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTIVITIESDURING PRE-LICENSING PHASE

MA51734T.046

10 CFR 60, PARAGRAPH 60.151

ACTIVITIES COVERED BY THE QA PROGRAM INCLUDE:

* SITE CHARACTERIZATION

* FACILITY AND EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION

* FACILITY OPERATION

* PERFORMANCE CONFIRMATION

* PERMANENT CLOSURE

* DECONTAMINATION AND DISMANTLING OF SURFACEFACILITIES

MA51734T.047

, .

PROGRAM MANAGEMENTDOCUMENTS

MA51734T.048

4~

#/ E %m~ O L I m X fT -p

KA51734T.068

I ,

A

4.

do dip ab - -

c= NONBASELINE DOCUMENT

aJ BASELINE DOCUMENTWA51734T.070

v 4,

//////j//// r///

W//,5EM.I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

. ~~~~~I

I

I I MRS SEMP

I I

TRANSPORTATIONSEMP

U

a

PROJECT OFFICESEMP

PROJECT OFFICESEMP

.

-

MAA51734T.069

4.

MAJOR TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

* SITE CHARACTERIZATION PLANS

* EXPLORATORY SHAFT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

* SITE DATA COLLECTION

* REPOSITORY DESIGN

* WASTE PACKAGE DEVELOPMENT

MA51734T.049

PURPOSE OF THE SITECHARACTERIZATION PLAN

* TO IDENTIFY ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED DURING LICENSING

* TO IDENTIFY INFORMATION NEEDED TO RESOLVE ISSUES

* TO PRESENT PLANS FOR ACQUIRING AND ANALYZINGINFORMATION

MA5 1734T.050

I8

SIGNIFICANCE OF SCP SITECHARACTERIZATION PLAN (SCP)

* SCP WILL GUIDE THE DEPARTMENT'S SITE CHARACTERIZATIONPROGRAM UNTIL LICENSE APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED

* SCP ANDCRUCIAL

PERIODIC PROGRESS REPORTS WILL HAVEROLE OVER NEXT 6-7 YEARS

- IN NRC INTERACTIONS

- AS VEHICLES FOR PRESENTING INFORMATION ON SITECHARACTERIZATION PROGRAM TO STATES, PUBLIC,CONGRESS, UTILITIES

MA5 1734T.051

STRUCTURE OF SITE CHARACTERIZATIONPLAN

* PART A: DESCRIPTION OF SITE, WASTE PACKAGE, AND REPOSITORYDESIGN

7 INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTIVE CHAPTERS

- PRESENT INFORMATION ALREADY COLLECTED

- PROVIDE BASIS FOR IDENTIFYING ISSUES REMAINING TOBE RESOLVED AND TESTS TO BE PERFORMED

* PART B: SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROGRAM

CHAPTER 8

- PRESENTS RATIONALE FOR CONDUCTING SITE CHARACTERIZATION

- IDENTIFIES ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED DURING SITECHARACTERIZATION

- IDENTIFIES INFORMATION NEEDED TO RESOLVE ISSUES

- PRESENTS PLANS FOR ACQUIRING AND ANALYZING INFORMATION

MA51734T.052

SHAFTMETRICF ACILI

I\

'l1

.1r 1

: '1A..]

.'1t -I

1

0''$.M.N'7

; 1

',^4:.'.1an',

''^'1t' in

'.l:G q

J:,

.i,

Skye

..,

, ..

Ad

IN

.4 '

:

pO hOE^Ee«^S APEAt"S SUBSuef ACE EXCV ATOIA

A745ADI %-v '-- -

I .

EXPLORATORY SHAFT

FEATURE BASALT SALT TUFF

* FIRST SHAFT* SECOND SHAFT

* SHAFT CONSTRUCTIONMETHOD

* SHAFT DEPTH

* TEST HORIZONDEPTH

* UNDERGROUNDDRIFTS

6' FINISHED10' FINISHEDBLIND HOLE

BORING3400'3160'

(COHASSETT)

3400'

12' FINISHED12' FINISHED

CONVENTIONAL

2755'2555'

(LOWER SAN ANDREAS)5400'

12' FINISHED

12' FINISHED

CONVENTIONAL

1480'1200'

(TOPAPAH SPRINGS)9600'

MA51734T.053

S~~~~~~J t

EXPLORATORY SHAFT FACILITY

STATUS* PRELIMINARY DESIGN COMPLETED FOR BASALT, TUFF,

AND SALT

* FINAL DESIGN PLANNING UNDERWAY FOR TUFF ANDBASALT; SALT AT 30% FINAL DESIGN LEVEL

* SITE SELECTED AND MAJOR EQUIPMENT ON-SITE ATTUFF AND BASALT

* SITE PREPARATION COMPLETED AT BASALT

- ROAD AND UTILITIES COMPLETED TO NTS BOUNDARYAT TUFF

MA51734T.054

REQUIRED ACTIVITIES PRIOR TOSHAFT SINKING

* PRESIDENTIAL RECOMMENDATION

* ISSUE SITE CHARACTERIZATION PLAN

* HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS

* RECEIVE COMMENTS OF AREA RESIDENTS, STATESAND INDIAN TRIBES

MA51734T.055

SITE DATA COLLECTIONSITE BORINGS, LABORATORY TESTING, ANALYSIS, AND MODELLINGTO CHARACTERIZE:

GEOLOGYSTRATIGRAPHY - THICKNESS VARIABILITY EXTENT OF ROCKLAYERS TECTONICS AND SEISMOLOGY - FOLDING, FAULTING,EARTHQUAKE POTENTIAL

GEOENGINEERINGROCK PROPERTIES - STRENGTH, IN-SITU STRESS

HYDROLOGYWATER QUALITY, QUANTITY, LEVELS, FLOW DIRECTION, TRAVELTIME, CLIMATIC AND FLOODING CONDITIONS AND IMPACT

GEOCHEMISTRYWATER-WASTE-ROCK INTERACTIONSRADIONUCLIDE TRANSPORT IN THE' WATER-ROCK SYSTEM

ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIOECONOMICENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORINGSOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PROFILESENVIRONMENTAL DATA COLLECTION MA51734T.057

SITE INFORMATION ACQUISITION METHODS

* SURFACE BASED TESTING- BOREHOLES- TRENCHING- ENVIRONMENTAL

* UNDERGROUND TESTING (EXPLORATORY SHAFT)- CONSTRUCTION TESTING

* SHAFT MAPPING* GROUND-WATER INFLOW* GEOLOGIC MAPPING* GROUT/SEAL INTEGRITY* ROOM DEFORMATION

- IN-SITU TESTING* THERMOMECHANICAL TESTS* GEOPHYSCIAL TESTS* SEAL-PERFORMANCE TETS

MAS1734T.056

REPOSITORYKEY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

* TOTAL DESIGN CAPACITY - 70,000 MTU

* SPENT FUEL RECEIPTS - 62,000 MTU: HLW RECEIPTS - 8,000 MTU

* PHASE I RECEIPT RATE: SPENT FUEL - 400 MTU/YEAR

* PHASE 11 RECEIPT RATE: SPENT FUEL - 3,000 MTU/YEARHLW - 400 MTU/YEAR

* ALL FUEL WILL BE PACKED INTACT

* PHASE II: 10% WILL BE PACKAGED INTACT90% WILL BE HANDLED AS CONSOLIDATED FUEL

* SPENT FUEL RECEIPTS WILL BE 60% PWR AND 40% BWR

* CAPABILITY TO BEGIN WASTE RETRIEVAL WILL BE MAINTAINED FORUP TO 50 YEARS FORM THE START OF WASTE EMPLACEMENT

MA51734T.058

. .. . .......... ...:- ._ _ _ ;

DrahviogeIt Eihous Cokvkmto

1 . Ilabut Pond

Wet I iWasm 1,l\ \47

CoskSarge

Ed UpA oad Ami ROd

OWOLW. mo\il cd

Waste olotion Faclity Concept

It

REPOSITORYSTATUS* TWO-PHASE REPOSITORY FACILITY;DESIGN STUDIES COMPLETED

FOR MISSION PLAN

* MRS/REPOSITORY DESIGN INTEGRATION STUDY COMPLETED

* SCP CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS COMPLETED; FINAL REPORTS,NOW IN PREPARATION, WILL REPRESENT CURRENT STATEOF DESIGN INFORMATION

* RETRIEVABILITY POSITION BASELINED

* SITE-SPECIFIC DATA ON ROCK MASS PROPERTIES BEINGINVESTIGATED

* PRELIMINARY SEALING AND ROCK MECHANICS TESTPLANS DEVELOPED

* BUREAU OF MINE TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROTOCOL IN PLACE;MOU WITH MSHA FOR TECHNICAL SUPPORT IN PLACE

MA51734T.059

.

WASTE PACKAGEKEY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

* PROVIDE FOR SAFE HANDLING OF THE WASTE

* PRESERVE ABILITY TO SAFELY RETRIEVE THEWASTE UNTIL REPOSITORY CLOSURE

* PROVIDE ESSENTIALLY COMPLETE CONTAINMENTOF RADIONUCLIDES FOR 300 - 1000 YEARS

* CONTRIBUTE TO LIMITING RELEASE OFRADIONUCLIDES FORM THE ENGINEERED BARRIERSYSTEM TO THE HOST ROCK OVER THE LONGTERM

MA51734T.060

WASTE PACKAGESTATUS* WASTE PACKAGE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS COMPLETED FOR SCP;

FINAL REPORTS, NOW IN PREPARATION, WILL REPRESENTCURRENT STATE OF DESIGN INFORMATION

* WASTE PACKAGE ADVANCED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLANNING UNDERWAY

* WASTE ACCEPTANCE PRELIMINARY SPECIFICATIONS (WAPS)FOR DEFENSE WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY AND WEST VALLEYDEMONSTRATION PROJECT ISSUED

* REFERENCE AND ALTERNATIVE BARRIER MATERIALS SELECTEDFOR TESTING

* FEASIBILITY EVALUATION OF COPPER-BASE MATERIALS COMPLETED

* TESTING OF WASTE FORMS AND BARRIER MATERIALS UNDERREPOSITORY CONDITIONS UNDERWAY

* INITIAL WASTE PACKAGE CORROSION AND RADIONUCLIDE RELEASEMODELS DEVELOPMENT UNDERWAY

MA51734T.061

f'I

WASTE PACKAGECURRENT DESIGNS

BASALT* EMPLACEMENT MODE - HORIZONTAL* REFERENCE CONTAINER MATERIAL - CARBON STEEL (CHROME-

MOLY STEEL, CUPRONICKEL)** PACKING MATERIAL - 75% BASALT, 25% BENTONITE CLAY

SALT* EMPLACEMENT MODE - VERTICAL (HORIZONTAL)

* REFERENCE CONTAINER MATERIAL - CARBON STEEL

* PACKING MATERIAL - CRUSHED SALT

TUFF* EMPLACEMENT MODE - VERTICAL (HORIZONTAL)* REFERENCE CONTAINER MATERIAL - STAINLESS STEEL

(INCOLOY, COPPER-BASE)* PACKING MATERIAL NONE (CRUSHED TUFF FOR SPENT FUEL)

() DESIGNATES ALTERNATIVES MA51734T.062

'I

9. SECOND REPOSITORY

* IF CONGRESS TAKES ACTION TO AFFIRM THE PROGRAM INTHE MISSION PLAN AMENDMENT, A REPOSITORY TECHNOLOGYDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM WILL CONTINUE LEADING TOINITIATION OF SITE-SPECIFIC WORK IN THE MID-TO-LATE 1990's

* IF CONGRESS DOES NOT TAKE ACTION TO AFFIRM THEPROGRAM IN THE MISSION PLAN AMENDMENT, SITE-SPECIFICWORK WOULD BEGIN FOLLOWING ISSUANCE OF THE FINALAREA RECOMMENDATION REPORT

MA51734T.063

-

PURPOSE OF

SECOND REPOSITORY TECHNOLOGYDEVELOPMENT

DEVELOP AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO EVALUATECONCEPTUAL GEOLOGIC SETTINGS ON PERFORMANCEPARAMETERS WHICH WILL RESULT IN A HIGH LEVELOF CONFIDENCE SO THAT FEWER AREAS OF SMALLERSIZE CAN BE SELECTED EARLY IN THESITING PROCESS

MA5 1734T.064

as\

SECOND REPOSITORYTECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

DESCRIPTION

* MAJOR EMPHASIS ON GEOSCIENCE CHARACTERIZATIONAND PERFORMANCE

* SUPPORTED BY CONSIDERATION OF ENGINEERING PARAMETERSTO EXTENT NECESSARY TO IDENTIFY CONCEPTUAL GEOLOGICALSETTINGS

* BUILT UPON EXPERIENCE GAINED FROM THE FIRST REPOSITORYPROGRAM AND THROUGH INTERNATIONAL EFFORTS

* REGULATORY BASED (I.E. OCFR960, OCFR60, 40CFRI91)

* INTEGRATES GEOSCIENCE PERFORMANCE, ENGINEERINGCOMPATIBILITY, WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS TO SELECTPREFERRED CONCEPTUAL GEOLOGIC SETTINGS

MA5 1 734T.065

A

SECOND REPOSITORY PROGRAM SCHEDULE

PROPOSEDPROGRAM

ALTERNATIVEPROGRAM

BEGIN NATIONAL SURVEY

COMPLETE NATIONAL SURVEY

ISSUE DRAFT AREA RECOMMENDATION REPORT

ISSUE FINAL AREA RECOMMENDATION REPORT

NOMINATE AND RECOMMEND SITES FOR CHARACTERIZATION

PRESIDENT RECOMMENDS SITE TO CONGRESS

NRC ISSUES CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION

BEGIN OPERATION

1995

1997

2000

2002

2007

2015

2018

2023

COMPLETED

COMPLETED

COMPLETED

1989

1994

2002

2005

2010

MA51734T.066

I

DRAFTSTATEMENT OF WORK

DOE - OCRWMSYSTEMS ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT& MANAGEMENT (SEDM) CONTRACTOR

MARK W. FREI

CHIEF, ENGINEERING BRANCH

OFFICE OF GEOLOGICREPOSITORIES

JUNE 16, 1987MA51734T.093

4 *i

DRAFT STATEMENT OF WORKCONTENTS OVERVIEW

1. INTRODUCTION

II. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATION, AND SCHEDULE

Ill. DESCRIPTION OF WORK

IV. MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM


APPENDICES

MA5 1 734T.094

f4*

1. INTRODUCTION

A. PROGRAM SUMMARY

B. WORKSCOPE SUMMARY

C. STATEMENT OF WORK ORGANIZATION

MA5 1 734T.095

L.

A

WORKSCOPE SUMMARY

SEDM CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE

* OVERALL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF THE NUCLEAR WASTEMANAGEMENT SYSTEM

- REPOSITORIES

- TRANSPORTATION

- MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE (MRS) FACILITY,IF AUTHORIZED

* ENSURING CHARACTERIZATION OF THE FIRST REPOSITORYCANDIDATE SITES

* ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTED FIRSTREPOSITORY SITE THROUGH RECEIPT OF NRCCONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION

* FIRST REPOSITORY TITLE III DESIGN/INSPECTION ANDOPERATIONS SUPPORT TO DOE AND THE SELECTEDREPOSITORY OPERATOR

MA5 1 734T.096

A .4

WORKSCOPE SUMMARYCONTINUED

* INTEGRATION WITH AND ASSISTANCE TO SECONDREPOSITORY PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

* DESIGN AND LICENSING SERVICES FOR THE MRS.IF AUTHORIZED*

* INTEGRATION OF THE WORK PERFORMED BY VARIOUSPROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

- NATIONAL LABORATORIES

- OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES

- PRIME CONTRACTORS

* ASSISTANCE IN AFFECTED STATE AND INDIAN TRIBECONSULTATION AND COOPERATION ACTIVITIES

*PENDING A DOE CONTRACT DECISION REGARDINGDETAILED DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION MA51734T.097

it

11. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, ORGANIZATION,AND SCHEDULE

A. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION

1. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLANS AND PROCEDURES

2. PROGRAM ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES

A. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - HEADQUARTERSB. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, DEVELOPMENT, AND MANAGEMENT

CONTRACTORC. FIRST REPOSITORY PROJECT OFFICESD. MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE PROJECT OFFICEE. OTHER DOE OPERATIONS OFFICESF. CONTRACTORS PERFORMING OTHER OCRWM WORKSCOPE

B. PROGRAM SCHEDULE

MA51734T.098

;'0

al

ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES-DOE-HQ-

* ENSURE NWPA REQUIREMENTS ARE MET

* MANAGE SEDM CONTRACT AND OTHER HQ PRIMECONTRACTORS

* ESTABLISH OVERALL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS;APPROVE IMPLEMENTING PLANS

* APPROVE AND CONTROL COST, SCHEDULE, AND TECHNICALBASELINES

* ASSIGN WORKSCOPE, AND PROVIDE BUDGET GUIDANCE ANDDIRECTION

* SUBMIT LICENSE APPLICATIONS TO NRC

* SERVE AS POINT OF CONTACT WITH CONGRESS, NRC,OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES, AND AFFECTED STATESAND INDIAN TRIBES

MA5 1 734T.099

ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES- SEDM CONTRACTOR -

* MINIMUM OFFICE LOCATIONS

- WASHINGTON D.C. METROPOLITAN AREA- THE 3 FIRST REPOSITORY CANDIDATE SITES- THE MRS SITE (IF AUTHORIZED)

IN ADDITION TO ANY CENTRAL WORK OFFICE NOTLOCATED ABOVE

* CONTRACTUALLY AND TECHNICALLY REPORT TO DOE-HQ

* IMPLEMENT NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESIGNAND INTEGRATION DIRECTION FROM DOE-HQ

* PROVIDE TECHNICAL, SCHEDULE, AND BUDGET DIRECTIONTO FIRST REPOSITORY PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

* IMPLEMENT DIRECTION FROM MRS PROJECT OFFICE

* IMPLEMENT TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM DIRECTION FROM DOE-HQ

* EXCHANGE INFORMATION WITH SECOND REPOSITORY ANDOTHER PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

MA51734T. 100

FIGURE 11.1CURRENT PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

- FIRST REPOSITORY -.

DOEHo

oCf

HOTECHNcLSUPORTSERVCES

CONACOroS

II -

-

OPERATIONSOFFIS

PROJECTOFFICES

_4 _ _ _

PROJECTTECHNICAL

SUPPORTSERINCES

CONTRTR

I

I I�I

11PLEMENTINGCONTRACTORS

FIELD TESTNOPERW. ASSESS

LICENSING

�1� a

Im

EXPLORATORYSHAFT

CON STRUCTI noNCONTRACTORS

UntoAM OWRMtODORAM

iWASTEPACKAGE

CONTRACTORS

EXPLORATORYSHAFTDESIGN

CONTRACTORS

REPOSYTORYDESGN

CONTRACTORS_

-Jm.,.

. A

I if

FIGURE 11.2PLANNED PROGRAM ORGANIZATION

- FIRST REPOSITORY --

DOE"a

OCW

Ho

sEInicESCOTACTl

mi a~~-

I m mmmcor

SCRYCESCO9ThACS

-

mmmm-

OnEAlmosOFF=ES

PMOOFFICES

-

-mmm

ISW,

CO1RLACT

ASSESSMENT

REPOSifORYDESIGNIv'Tr.

WASTE PACKA

EV

II

W "

BASELWINE

OuDEBASELUNR

III

F- I ifi- OTR

FEDERg5

CONTRACTORS

FIEWTESTin

EXPWRATORYS"AFTDESIO

COWIRACTORS

PLRATQRYS"AFt

coNSrTRtCeOCONtTRACtORS

* CYIWCAUCIMMY. AND WJDW I

Ill. DESCRIPTION OF WORK

A. INTRODUCTION

B. OFFICE OF CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENTPROGRAM WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

C. WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION BY WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE ELEMENT

1. MINED GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL SYSTEM

a. FIRST REPOSITORYb. SECOND REPOSITORY

2. FEDERAL INTERIM STORAGE

3. MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE

4. TRANSPORTATION

5. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

6. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

MA51734T.101

PROGRAM WBSNUCLEAR WASTE

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPROGRAM

(0.0)I

I

MINED GEOLOGICDISPOSAL SYSTEM

11.0.0)

FEDERALINTERIM

STORAGE(2.0.0)

I

MRS13.0.0)

_I

TRANS-PORTATION

(4.0.01

I

R&D(6.0.0)

,IPROGRAM

MANAGEMENT(6.0.0)

,

- BASALT (1.1.0)

XTUFF (1.2.0)|

_ iSAL .3.0)CRYSTALLINE (1.4.0)

"NOW CALLED "REPOSITORY TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT"

MA51734T.1 19

WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION- FIRST REPOSITORY -

* SEDM CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ALL DELIVERABLES WILL MEETNRC LICENSING REQUIREMENTS DURING- SITE CHARACTERIZATION- DESIGN THROUGH TITLE III- LICENSING PROCESS

* SEDM CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SUPPORT TO DOE AND REPOSITORYOPERATING CONTRACTOR FOR OPERATING LICENSE PREPARATION.

* FOR FIELD-RELATED SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORK, SEDMCONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE EXISTING CONTRACTORS- BOREHOLE DRILL/TEST - GEOPHYSICAL TESTING- INSITU TESTING - ETC.

* FOR OTHER WORK, SEDM CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CARRYOUT SUCH WORK, UTILIZING EXISTING PARTICIPANTS TO EXTENT FEASIBLE- WASTE PACKAGE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT - MATERIALS TESTING- REPOSITORY & SEALS DESIGN - ETC.

MA51734T.102

a

WORKSCOPE DEFINITION- FIRST REPOSITORY -

(CONTINUED)

* SYSTEMS

* WASTE PACKAGE

* SITE

* REPOSITORY

* REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL

* EXPLORATORY SHAFT

* TEST FACILITIES

* LAND ACQUISITION

* PROJECT MANAGEMENT MA51734T.103

I

WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION- SECOND REPOSITORY -

* SEDM CONTRACTOR TO INTEGRATE SECOND REPOSITORY REQUIRE-MENTS WITH THE NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

* SEDM CONTRACTOR TO ASSIST SECOND REPOSITORYPROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

- ENSURE NWPA COMPLIANCE

- ENSURE TRANSFER OF FIRST REPOSITORY PROGRAMINFORMATION

- DEVELOP CONCEPTUAL DESCRIPTIONS AND DATAREQUIREMENTS/ANALYSES OF FACILITIES AND ENGINEEREDCOMPONENTS, AS DIRECTED BY DOE-HQ

* SEDM CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE TRANSFER OFINTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE EFFORTS INFORMATIONTO PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

MAS 1734T. 104

I,,

a

WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION- FEDERAL INTERIM STORAGE -

* SEDM CONTRACTOR NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THISWBS ELEMENT

MA51734T.105

x, .

r

WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION- MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE -

* SHOULD DOE RECEIVE CONGRESSIONAL APPROVALFOR MRS CONSTRUCTION, SEDM CONTRACTOR WILL BEREQUIRED TO PROVIDE MRS DESIGN AND LICENSINGSERVICES

* SEDM CONTRACTOR WOULD CONTINUE SUCH SERVICESUNLESS & UNTIL DOE HAS MADE A PROCUREMENTDECISION TO TRANSFER MRS DETAILED DESIGN,CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION TO A SEPARATEREQUIREMENT (TO BE COMPETED)

* SEDM CONTRACTOR WILL CONTINUE OVERALL NUCLEARWASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INTEGRATION IN THE EVENTOF SUCH A TRANSFER

MA51734T.106

WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION- MONITORED RETRIEVABLE STORAGE -

(CONTINUED)

* ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIONS

* DESIGN

* REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

* CONSTRUCTION*

* QUALITY ASSURANCE

* OPERATIONS*

* INSTITUTIONAL INTERACTIONS

* PROJECT MANAGEMENT*SEDM CONTRACTOR NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS WBS ELEMENT

MA51734T.107

IF

WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION- TRANSPORTATION -

* CASK SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT*

* SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT*

* OPERATIONS*

* INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING AND ANALYSIS*

* SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

* MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION

SEDM CONTRACTOR NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS WBS ELEMENT

MA51734T.108

.I

WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT -

* R&D WORK IS FUNDED UNDER THE CIVILIAN R&DPROGRAM APPROPRIATION- SUBSEABED- DRY STORAGE- ROD CONSOLIDATION

* SEDM CONTRACTOR NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS WORK

MA51734T. 109

.1

WORKSCOPE DESCRIPTION- PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-

* PROGRAM DIRECTION*

* SYSTEMS INTEGRATION

* POLICY**

* OUTREACH*** ADMINISTRATION*** FUND MANAGEMENT**

* QUALITY ASSURANCE

* TECHNICAL SUPPORT**

* NOT APPLICABLESEDM CONTRACTOR NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS WBS ELEMENT

MA51734T.1 10

.t

IV. MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM

A. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

B. PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS

2. PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

C. TECHNICAL CONTROL SYSTEM1. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN2. WORK PLANS

D. QUALITY ASSURANCE1. QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONS2. QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS3. QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

E. MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM PROCEDURESMA51734T.1 11

j1

MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM- OVERVIEW -

* SEDM CONTRACTOR'S MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM MUST MEET.OCRWM REQUIREMENTS, AND RELEVANT DOE ORDERS, SUCH AS- OCRWM PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PMS) MANUAL- DOE 4700.1, PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM- DOE 2250.IB, COST AND SCHEDULE CONTROL

SYSTEM CRITERIA FOR CONTRACTPERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS

* UPON AWARD, SEDM CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE- PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP)- SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEMP)- QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN (QAP)

* THESE 3 PLANS WILL IDENTIFY REQUIRED PLANS ANDPROCEDURES TO BE PREPARED BY THE SEDM CONTRACTORTO ENSURE CONTROL OF WORKSCOPE AND ACTIVITIES

MA1734T.1 12

PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM

* SEDM CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE MINIMUM FUNCTIONS:- ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND OPERATE A PROJECT MANAGEMENT

SYSTEM AND A DOCUMENT CONTROL SYSTEM.- PERFORM INTERNAL CONTRACT MANAGEMENT & CONTROL ACTIVITIES- MAINTAIN AND OPERATE CONTRACT-RELATED PARTS OF THE

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (IMS)

* THE PMP, TO BE APPROVED BY DOE-HQ, SHALL CONTAIN DOE 4700.1RECOMMENDED INFORMATION AND OCRWM PMS MANUAL INFORMATION

* MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS IN DOE 4700.1APPLY TO SEDM CONTRACTOR WORK ON THE FIRST REPOSITORYAND MRS (IF AUTHORIZED)

* SEDM CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH A PERFORMANCEMEASUREMENT SYSTEM THAT CAN BE VALIDATED PER THE COST/SCHEDULE CONTROL SYSTEM CRITERIA (C/SCSC) IN DOE 2250.1B

MA5I734T.1 13

A

'I-

I

TECHNICAL CONTROL SYSTEM

* SEDM CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A SEMP, TO BE APPROVED BY DOEMHQ, THAT IMPLEMENTS THE OCRWM PROGRAM TECHNICALCONTROL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE OCRWM SEMP

* SEDM CONTRACTOR'S SEMP SHALL INCLUDE OR ADDRESS:- IDENTIFICATION OF IMPLEMENTING - SOFTWARE CONTROL

TECHNICAL PROCEDURES & PLANS- SYSTEM ENGINEERING APPROACH - TECHNICAL INTERFACE CONTROL- CONFIGURATION CONTROL - PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT- DESIGN REVIEWS METHODOLOGY.,TEST MANAGEMENT - TECHNICAL DECISION DOCUMENTATION

* SEDM CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE TECHNICAL WORK PLANS,TO BE APPROVED BY DOE-HQ, FOR MAJOR CONTRACT ACTIVITIESTO ENSURE ADEQUACY AND APPROPRIATE PROGRAM INTEGRATION

MA51734T.114

; . .

QUALITY ASSURANCE

* SEDM CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE MINIMUM FUNCTIONS:- DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT AN INTERNAL QA PROGRAM PLAN,

TO BE APPROVED BY DOE-HQ AND NRC- DEVELOP ALL NECESSARY IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES- PERFORM AND ANALYZE AUDITS, SURVEILLANCES, ETC.

TO VERIFY QA PLAN IMPLEMENTATION- ASSIST DOE IN ITS QA ACTIVITIES AND DOCUMENT

PREPARATION- DEVELOP AND CONDUCT QA INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING- REVIEW REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS FOR QA REQUIREMENTS

COMPLIANCE- REVIEW OTHER PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS' QA PLANS

AND PROCEDURES

* SEDM CONTRACTOR QA PROGRAM SHALL MEET APPLICABLEREQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/ASME NQA-1, ETC

MA51734T.1 16


A. SUMMARY OF TRANSITION PERIOD

B. TRANSITION PLAN

C. AUTHORIZATION TO PERFORM TECHNICAL WORK

D. TRANSITION OF WORK TO THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING,DEVELOPMENT, AND MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR1. STATUS OF EXISTING CONTRACTS 42. TRANSITION OF WORK TO THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING,

DEVELOPMENT, AND MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR

E. TRANSITION OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, DEVELOPMENT,AND MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR WORK TO MRSCONTRACTOR

MA51734T.1 15

.

A

TRANSITIONLIMITED (PER TRANSITION PLAN)

STAFFINGOFFICE

PREPARATION

PROGRAMFAMIUARIZATION

MANAGEMENTCONTROLSYSTEMS

DEVELOPMENT

TRAININGOF STAFF

4'-'-T

4 u~~~~I - m1w

lMP.6MP * DOE

PPROVAL z'CRITICAL PLANS&K QVP I T PROCEDURES

T * ~~APPROVEDz. A

NN."CRITCLc~ PROCEDURES-

I 9

LI. U

w

Ap

ADDITIONAL TRAIMNG

A AA A4 4 i + AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION

SELECTION DOE TO BEGIN TO BEGINOF APPROVAL LIMITED PASE.IN FULL PHASE-tN

SEom Of OF OUALITY. Of OUAUTY.CONTRACTOR CONTRAC TRANSITION AFFECTING WORE AFFECTING WORK"

CONTRACOR CONTACT PLANAWARD aa

* FT 1963.Ilolls

. FT lst. I

blts

FY 1990-

101

-WI! TABLE V.* FOR WLEM ATIO O WORIMMU F MNOM InG COWYRACTORSAOE WSI REVIE W01 SVtCCelipU COMPLEtED MA5 1734T.002

0 .

TRANSITION PLAN- CONTENTS -

* ORGANIZATION

* STAFFING

* OFFICE LOCATIONS

* DEVELOPMENT/IMPLEMENTATION OF MANAGEMENTCONTROL SYSTEMS

* FAMILIARIZATION APPROACH

* TRAINING

* READINESS PROCESS

* MILESTONES AND SCHEDULESMA51734T.1 17

POTENTIAL TRANSITION OF WORKSCOPETO SEDM CONTRACTOR

* SOW, TABLE V.1, "MAJOR PRIME CONTRACTORS PERFORMINGRELATED WORKSCOPE FOR OCRWM"- CONTRACTOR NAME- SCOPE OF WORK/CONTRACT #/CONTRACT TITLE- WBS - WORKSCOPE PERFORMED FOR- CONTRACT PERIOD

* SOW, TABLE V.2, "POTENTIAL TRANSITION OF WORKSCOPETO SEDM CONTRACTOR"- CONTRACTOR NAME- SCOPE OF WORK/CONTRACT #

- ANTICIPATED PHASE-IN DATE- POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE DELIVERABLES

MA51734T.1 18

PROCUREMENT PRESENTATIONOVERVIEW

* COMPETITION CONSIDERATIONS

* ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

* CONTRACT TYPE

MA51734T.075

I1

4F

COMPETITION CONSIDERATIONS

* STEPS TO ENSURE FULL AND OPENCOMPETITION

* COMPETITION PROCESS

MA5 1 734T.076

I'S

STEPS TO ENSURE FULL AND OPENCOMPETITION

* OCI GUIDELINES

* PUBLIC READING ROOMS

* CONFERENCES

MA51734T.077

4 -,

COMPETITION PROCESS

* UNRESTRICTED RFP

* SEB PROCEDURES

MA51734T.078

ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OFINTEREST OCI)

* DEFINITION--DEAR PART 909.5

* GUIDELINES

MA5 1734T.079

OCI DEFINITION -- DEAR 909.570-3

"ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST" MEANS THAT A RELATIONSHIPOR SITUATION EXISTS WHEREBY AN OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR (INCLUDINGCHIEF EXECUTIVES AND DIRECTORS, TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY WILL ORDO BECOME INVOLVED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT, ANDPROPOSED CONSULTANTS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WHERE THEY MAY BEPERFORMING SERVICES SIMILAR TO THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THEPRIME) HAS PAST, PRESENT, OR CURRENTLY PLANNED INTERESTS THATEITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THROUGH A CLIENT RELATIONSHIPRELATE TO THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNDER A DEPARTMENT CONTRACTAND WHICH (1) MAY DIMINISH ITS CAPACITY TO GIVE IMPARTIAL,TECHNICALLY SOUND, OBJECTIVE ASSISTANCE, AND ADVICE, OR (2) MAYRESULT IN IT BEING GIVEN AN UNFAIR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE. ITDOES NOT INCLUDE THE NORMAL FLOW OF BENEFITS FROM THEPERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT.

MA51734T.080

OCI GUIDELINES PURPOSE

* ADDRESS AREAS OF POTENTIAL OCI FOROCRWM INCUMBENTS

* FURTHER PROMOTE FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

MAS1734T.081

OCI GUIDELINES CONTENTS

* FAIR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

* UNFAIR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

* BIAS

* PROPOSAL PREPARATION CONFLICTS

* REPRESENTATION OR DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATION

* QUESTIONNAIRE

* SSO DETERMINATION

MA51734T.082

CONTRACT TYPE

* MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING (M&O) CONTRACT

* COST-PLUS-AWARD-FEE

MA51734T.083

;

t

MANAGEMENT & OPERATING (M&O)CONTRACT

* BACKGROUND AND UNIQUE ASPECTS

* SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

MA51734T.084

i

M&O CONTRACT BACKGROUNDAND UNIQUE ASPECTS

* BACKGROUND

-DATES BACK TO WWII MANHATTAN ENGINEERDISTRICT PROJECT

* UNIQUE ASPECTS ,

- LONG-TERM CLOSE WORKING RELATIONSHIP INPURSUIT OF AGENCY MISSION.

- CONTRACTOR HIRED TO MANAGE; GOVERNMENT RETAINSOVERALL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICALDIRECTION RESPONSIBILITIES

-GOVERNMENT ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURITY,HEALTH, AND SAFETY

UA51734T.085

f , t .' &

-

M&O SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

* COST REIMBURSEMENTDETERMINED PER DEARCONTRACT TERMS

TYPE WITH COST ALLOWABILITYCOST PRINCIPLES AND

* COMPETE/EXTEND REVIEW CYCLE

* ANNUAL NEGOTIATIONS OF WORK PROGRAM ANDCORRESPONDING BUDGET AND FEE

* LETTER OF CREDIT FINANCING

* INTEGRATED ACCOUNTING SYSTEM

* SUBCONTRACTING APPROVALS

MA51734T.086

1 1 I I

CPAF DEFINITION - FAR 16.404-2

"A COST-PLUS-AWARD-FEE CONTRACT IS A COST-REIMBURSEMENTCONTRACT THAT PROVIDES FOR A FEE CONSISTING OF (1) ABASE AMOUNT FIXED AT INCEPTION OF THE CONTRACT AND (2)AN AWARD AMOUNT THAT THE CONTRACTOR MAY EARN IN WHOLEOR IN PART DURING PERFORMANCE AND THAT IS SUFFICIENT TOPROVIDE MOTIVATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN SUCH AREAS ASQUALITY, TIMELINESS, TECHNICAL INGENUITY, AND COST-EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT. THE AMOUNT OF THE AWARD FEE TO BEPAID IS DETERMINED BY THE GOVERNMENT'S JUDGMENTALEVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IN TERMS OFTHE CRITERIA STATED IN THE CONTRACT. THIS DETERMINATIONIS MADE UNILATERALLY BY THE GOVERNMENT AND IS NOT SUBJECTTO THE DISPUTES CLAUSE."

MA51734T.087

\

PRESOLICITATION CONFERENCECONCLUSION

* POINT OF CONTACTALETA EGELANDCONTRACTING OFFICERU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SWWASHINGTON, D.C. 20585

N.

N

(202) 586-1360

* WRAP-UP

MA51734T.088

I

t f,