Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration System Wide Information Management Segment 1B Final Investment Decision Members of the JRC Ahmad Usmani, SWIM Program Manager July 15, 2009
Presented to:
By:
Date:
Federal AviationAdministrationSystem Wide
Information ManagementSegment 1B
Final Investment Decision
Members of the JRC
Ahmad Usmani, SWIM Program Manager
July 15, 2009
2Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 2
Program Concept
SWIM will:• Implement a Service-Oriented Architecture
(SOA) in the NAS• Allow the FAA to create new system interfaces
more quickly and cheaper than is possible today
• Facilitate the data-sharing that is required for NextGen
SWIM is not:• A set of avionics equipment• A substitute for NAS modernization programs• An FTI replacement
SWIM is an IT infrastructure program that will operate in the background to provide data to authorized users
3Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 3
Business as Usual
HostWARP
IDS/ERIDS
ATOP
CIWS
TFMTMA
STARS/ARTS/TAMR
ERAM
ASDE
ETMS
Inter-Agency
Today
State of the System
- Existing point-to-point hardwired NAS- Unique interfaces, custom designs
- More point-to-pointunique interfaces- Costly development, test, maintenance, CM- New decisions linked to old data constructs- Cumbersome data access outside the NAS
Enterprise Management
LEGEND
SWIM Segment 1SWIM Future Segment
SWIM Adapter
FAA Systems
SWIM Compliant Non-Government
Systems
SWIM Compliant Government
SystemsFTI
TFMS
CIW
S
TDDS
ITWS
WMSCR
AIM
TBFM
DOTS
ERAM
CART
S/ST
ARS
4Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 4
Program Overview• IARD in September 2005, IID in July 2006• Nine Segment 1 capabilities were derived from
Communities of Interest, and a SWIM Business Case was presented to the JRC in June 2007
• SWIM received approval for FY09 and FY10 funding and associated activities at the June 2007 Final Investment Decision (FID)
• JRC direction to SWIM was to return in 2009 with refined cost estimates for review and approval by the JRC for the remaining years of SWIM Implementation. Based on development contractor estimates AJF recommends requesting funding for FY11 – FY15
5Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 5
SWIM Segment 1 COI Capabilities
AIM
SUA AutomatedData Exchange
Weather
CIWS Publication
ITWS Publication
PIREP Data Publication
Flight & Flow Management
Flight DataPublication
Terminal Data Distribution
Flow Information Publication
RVR Publication
RerouteData Exchange
6Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 6
SWIM Architecture with Core Services
SWIM FTI IP Network
TFMS TPC/ DRC
ARTCCs
Terminal Facilities(Selected TRACONs & ATCTs)
ATCSCC
To Non-NAS systems
WJHTC
TFMSSWIM
Registry Server
NAS Boundary Protection
Other LAN and WAN connectivity for these systems
Other LAN and WAN connectivity for these systems
SAMS CP
TDLS
EFSTS
ASDE-X
ERAM
WMSCR
SA
SA
SA
SA = Service Adapter
= LAN Cabling, Switches
CS = SWIM GFE software
SA
SA
SA
CS
CS
RVRSA
SWIM Test Facility and
Lab
CS
CS
CS
SA
VPN
7Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 7
SWIM High-Level Program ScheduleO N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S
SWIM PMORisk Adjusted
TDDSRisk Adjusted
TFMRisk Adjusted
ERAM Flight Data Publication
Risk Adjusted
AIMRisk Adjusted
ITWSRisk Adjusted
CIWSRisk Adjusted
WMSCRRisk Adjusted
Legend
FY14 FY15
Operations and Maintenance=Design= Key Site Test/Deployment=
FY08 FY09 FY10
DT&E=Code & Test= System Integration &Test=Requirements=
FY11 FY12 FY13
OT&E=
Design
HW Engineering and Deploy
Phase 1 HW Engr/Deployment
Operations and Maintenance
Operations and Maintenance
Operations and Maintenance
Operations and Maintenance
Ope
Engineering Support
Governance
WJHTC SIP Lab Support
SWIM Registry/Repository
TDDSTFM
ERAMAIM
ITWSCIWS
WMSCR
Technical GovernanceNAS Program Governance
Lab ManagementLab Operations
ImplementationOperations
Key Site TestRequirements DesignCode & TFM-Reroute Sys DT&E
Re Code & TestDesignTFM Flow Information Publication
RequDesign DT&E Key Site Test
Phase 1:Initial Flight Data Services
Requirements&DesignDesign Code & Test DT&E
RequirementsDesign Code and TestPhase 2:Initial Flight Data Services PUB/SUB
OT&EDT&E
Phase 3:HADDS/FDIO and AIM SUA
Requirements DesignCode and Test DT&E OT&E
RequirementsDesign Code & TestPhase 4:WMSCR,TDDS,TFMS Flow Clients
DT&E
IOC
IOC
IOC
Key Site Test
Key Site Test
Key Site Test
AIM Requirements Sys Int/train
ITWS Require Design Syst Int & Test
PrototypeCIWS Code & Test
WMSCR Syst Int & Test Key Site Test Requirements Key Site Test Design Code & Test
TFM RVR Publication
OT&E
Sys Int DT&E OT&ECode & Test Key Site Test
Code & TestSys OT&E
OT&E
OT&E
Code & Test OT&EDT&E
Code & Test DT&E OT&E
DT&E
DT&E OT&E
DeploymentProof of ConceptTDDSIOC
Operations and MaintenancRequirementsPrototype SystemDesign Code and TestSys Int Field IOT&DT&EOT&E Key
8Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 8
Decision Requested• Approve Segment 1B baseline for FY11 – FY15
– Proceed with development and deployment of remaining Segment 1 SWIM capabilities by TFM, ERAM, TDDS, WMSCR, CIWS and ITWS
– SWIM PMO to provide Governance to Segment 1 participants and oversight to SWIM Implementing Programs (SIPs) implementation of capabilities
• In-service decisions are delegated to SIPs• Request a single CIP line for both Segment 1A and
Segment 1B• Tech Refreshes needed after FY15 to be the
responsibility of the SIPs
9Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 9
Performance Gap / Justification• FAA Flight Plan: Organization Excellence
– Objective 2 – Improve Financial Management While Delivering Quality Customer Service
• Reduce costs to deliver data services via external gateway• Reduce application-to-application development costs• Provide shared situational awareness through Flight Data Publication• Improve collaborative decision making
• ATO Five-Year Strategy Goals– 4.1.3 Achieve adaptability and affordability through a common
automation platform• ATO SMP: Pathway 2 – Enhance Financial Discipline
– P2.4 Reduce unit cost and improve value of operations• Automation of manual processes for capturing weather reports and
updating SUA status• Cost avoidance by enabling early retirement of HADDS and FDIO
10Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 10
Metrics and Associated Milestones(Section I.C. Table 2 of Exhibit 300 Report)
N/AReduce cycle time by 10% over original baseline by FY11
Measure initial baseline in FY10
Frequency of SUA Management Status updates.
Cycle Time Processes and Activities
FY10 -FY14
Four products in FY09
10% increase over FY10 baseline
No products in FY08.
Number of data products provided via SWIM
AccessibilityTechnologyFY09 -FY14
Cost to develop interface is $1.63M - $22.2M depending on complexity of interface and number of sites needing adaptation
Reduce by5% in FY10, 10% in FY11, 15% in FY12
Initial baseline in FY07, refined baseline in FY08, FY09
Cost of developing an application-to-application I/F
Customer Impact or Burden
Customer Results
FY07 -FY14
Currently one userIncrease FY10 baseline by 25% in FY14
Establish baseline in FY09; refine in FY10
Number of users connected to secure gateway
Information Security
Mission and Business Results
FY09 –FY14
Actual ResultsPlanned
Improvements to the Baseline
BaselineMeasurement Indicator
Measurement Category
Measurement Area
Fiscal Year
11Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 11
SWIM Program Management Overview
• SWIM PO is responsible for:– Overall Program Cost and Schedule– SWIM System Engineering and Requirements Management– Definition and Maintenance of Program Level Agreements (PLAs)
with implementing programs– Governance of Segment 1 participants
• SIPs are responsible for:– Managing the development and deployment of allocated SWIM
requirements per the SWIM Final Program Requirements Document and in accordance with the SWIM Program Schedule
– Reporting progress against schedule, providing monthly EVM information to SWIM PO per PLAs
12Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 12
•Source: NAS Architecture 6 Website
NAS Enterprise Services Roadmap
13Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 13
System Interdependencies
• SWIM Segment 1 has interdependencies with the following systems:– CIWS– ERAM– ITWS– AIM (NASR,SAMS)– TDDS (FDIO, TDLS/PDC, NGRVR, EFSTS, ASDE-X)– TFMS– WMSCR– FTI
14Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 14
Risk Management
IRDs are under development; SWIM Implementation team is coordinating and overseeing review
Design for threads across domains will be coordinated early withSIPS by SWIM PMO
MediumDesign coordination needed across SIPs for interface standards
Cost estimate reflects these factorsPerform risk adjustment and coordinate with a risk adjusted schedule; establish reasonable risk ranges for all WBS elements
MediumCost estimate may understate true costs
Schedule risk adjustment reflects these risk factorsConduct schedule analysis; establish a risk adjusted schedule program implementation; consolidate contractor and government activities and plans
MediumSchedule estimate may be incorrect
SWIM Implementation team is overseeing design and specifications as they are developed
Increase the modularity of the software; decouple the information management software from the application software; use open systems software whenever possible
MediumSoftware maintenance (more software fixes than planned may be required)
SWIM CM is in place; requirements documents have change control mechanism in place
Ensure that the baseline requirements document is complete; follow change management guidelines to ensure that scope changes are minimized
MediumScope/Requirements creep of program
An implementation plan has been developed with strategies to mitigate this risk. SWIM has attended Design Reviews for AIM, CIWS, ITWS, and WMSCR.
Internal and external reviews will be held with SIPs to ensure compliance with functional requirements and production and deployment schedule
MediumComplexity of implementation
A SWIM implementation plan has been developed with strategies to mitigate this risk
Internal and external reviews are being held with the SIP contractors to ensure compliance with functional requirements and production and deployment schedule
MediumContract management
Security concept being developed by ATO-P; current security requirements are flowed to SIPs
Working with security to identify security requirements, and specifically, which ones are allocated to SWIM
HighSecurity implementation
Engineering prototype at WJHTC was used in requirements validation process; use cases completed
Develop use cases for every anticipated application Medium Unspecified / Changing Segment 1 requirements
Coordination and communication with DOT, OMB and industry is on-going
Frequent coordination and communication with DOT, OMB and industry helps manage expectations and achieves early buy-in
MediumExternal Pressure
SWIM is working with SIPs to identify interface scheduling issues and the SWIM Implementation Team is supporting early development of IRDs by SIPs
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is very flexible, allows adding of interfaces without affecting other interfaces. Interface Requirement Documents (IRDs) will define interfaces
MediumInterface integration: staggered interface implementation
Current StatusStrategy for MitigationRisk RatingDescription of Risk
15Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 15
Issues
• Commitment by SIP PMOs to make SWIM a priority when there are competing demands for resources– Cultural changes associated with Portfolio
Management
16Federal AviationAdministration
SWIM Segment 1B Final Investment DecisionJuly 15, 2009 16
Decision Requested• Approve Segment 1B baseline for FY11 – FY15
– Proceed with development and deployment of remaining Segment 1 SWIM capabilities by TFM, ERAM, TDDS, WMSCR, CIWS, and ITWS
– SWIM PMO to provide Governance to Segment 1 participants and oversight to SIP implementation of capabilities
• In-service decisions are delegated to SIPs• Request a single CIP line for both Segment 1A and
Segment 1B• Tech Refreshes needed after FY15 to be the
responsibility of the SIPs