Lean Production PDCA A3 Business Case Initial Condition Target Condition Implementation Indicators Approval System Kaizen Process
Dec 05, 2014
Lean Production PDCA A3
Business Case Initial Condition Target Condition Implementation Indicators Approval
System Kaizen Process
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
2
“Lean Production” stands for...
…the complete and through elimination of waste to reduce the timeline from receipt of customer order to delivery.
...increase of efficiency and standardization by continuous improvements.
... a philosophy, as well as production techniques, for “cutting the fat” from production processes.
...the highest quality, lowest cost, shortest lead time...
... customer orientation,
orientation for quality and cost
reduction.
...A business system for organizing and managing product development, operations, suppliers, and customer relations that require less human effort, less space, less capital, less material, and less time to make products with fewer defects to precise customer desires.
...quick and agile as it provides the flexibility and speed to design
and produce a wide variety of products customized to specific
orders and delivered with extremely short lead times.
…the right part, in the right quantity,
at the right moment, in the right quality,
at the right place.
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
3
Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA)
An improvement cycle based on the scientific method of proposing a change in a process, implementing the change, measuring the results, and taking appropriate action.
The PDCA cycle has four stages:
1. Plan: Determine goals for a process and needed changes to achieve them.
2. Do: Implement the changes.
3. Check: Evaluate the results in terms of performance.
4. Act: Standardize and stabilize the change or begin the cycle again, depending on the results.
Plan
Do
Check
ActGrasp the
SituationStandardize
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
4
A one page storyboard on 11”x17”
paper, commonly known as A3-size
paper. Logic flows from the top left to
the bottom right, and each box leads
to the next one.
An A3 includes both analysis (number-
crunching) and synthesis (storytelling).
It’s a practice of getting the problem,
the analysis, the corrective actions,
and the action plan on a single sheet
of paper.
The primary purpose of the A3 is to
gain a shared understanding of critical
issues in order to solve problems and
get results.
A3 Report
Initial Condition:
Target Condition:
Implementation:
Approval
Indicators
Background / Business Case:
Project Name:
A3 Report
It’s a way of thinking.It’s a way of thinking.
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
5
A3 Report
Initial Condition:
Target Condition:
Implementation:
Approval
Indicators
Background / Business Case:
Project Name:
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
6
Define the Business Case
Increasing Customer expectations require
improved quality, delivery, and cost
Need to improve cost competitiveness to survive in a global
economy
- Growth/New Markets- Inventory Turnover- ROI Capital- Cost Reductions / Increase Margins
$
Be sure to link your plan to business objectives.Be sure to link your plan to business objectives.
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
7
A3 – Document Business Case
Background / Business Case:
Project Name: Hose Line Productivity Improvement
1. Increasing customer expectations and pressure require improvements in quality, delivery, and cost. 2. Need to improve cost competitiveness.
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
8
The LEAN Journey
Initial Condition
IDEAL Condition
•100% Value Add•0 Defects (Internal)•One Piece Continuous Flow•Human Development•Value to Society
•Hidden Waste (Problems)•Poor Equipment Efficiency•Poor Labor Efficiency•High Defect Rates•Large Batches• Infrequent improvement
Unclear Journey
Before you can begin the journey you must “Grasp the Initial Condition”.
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
9
Grasp the Initial Condition
Walk / Observe the Value Stream(s) from shipping to receiving.
Map the Process- Value Stream Map- Flow Chart- Spaghetti Diagram- Bubble Diagram- Work Flow
CustomerSupplier
Final AssemblyFabrication #2Fabrication #1
MRP
Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
MRP
Component Control
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI)
Customer Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
ASN
Warehouse
RM IWIP
Warehouse
FG
Daily Schedule
Daily Ship Schedule
Shuttle
Shuttle
IWIP
FTT= 98%
OEE= 70%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 1%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 3 - 10 Days
FTT= 96%
OEE= 50%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 2%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 2- 5 Days
FTT= 94%
OEE= 65%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 4%
Uptime= 75%
EPEI = 1 – 2 Days
Expedited
20 min
1 Day 1 Day
30 min
2 Days
20 min
4 Days RM Production Lead Time = 8.3 Days
Processing Lead Time = 70 min. (0.6%)
Kanban Rack
Kan
ban
Rac
kK
anba
n R
ack
HFV6 Jumper
Tube Punch
Sort
Table
Washer DrainRack
WasherDrainRack
FC
Bench
Tool Chest
2.7L EF1042
Bead Checker E
F00
53
- H
it
EF0061 - Hit
WIP
Rack EF007
3 - Hit
EF008 EF009EF0012 - Hit
EF10412.7
EF0152 - Hit
Drop
Auto Loader
2.7L JR &
LHS
kive & P
unch
Lo
ad
Un
load
Ele
ctric 11
0V
EF0042 - Hit
EF0042 - Hit Load Unload
EF
Mach
ine
EF
01
0
Robot
Guarding
Gua
rdin
g
Gua
rdin
g
Robot Controller
3
5
6
3
6
7
5
4
SP
C T
able
45
2
2
1
1
1
5
1
5
1
4
5
1
1
1
2
2
5
Template: Quick Connect - Red LineJumper - Blue Line
Cutter
Racetrack 1
Racetrack 2
Racetrack 3
Hose Assy 1
Hose Assy 2
HoseAssy 3
Crimp 1
Crimp 2
Crimp 3
Butter-Fly 1
Butter-Fly 2
Butter-Fly 3
Clench1
Clench2
Test, Inspect,Tape, Gauge,
And Pack1
1 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 1 x 2 x 1
= 54 different possible paths through production
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Key Process IndicatorsIndicators: Current
Lead Time 8.3 days
WIP 12,168
Productivity (MH/100) 6.00
Bubble Diagram (# Paths) 54
OBC (% over ideal) 25%
Problems / Opportunities
CustomerSupplier
Final AssemblyFabrication #2Fabrication #1
MRP
Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
MRP
Component Control
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI)
Customer Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
ASN
Warehouse
RM IWIP
Warehouse
FG
Daily Schedule
Daily Ship Schedule
Shuttle
Shuttle
IWIP
1
2
FTT= 98%
OEE= 70%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 1%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 3 - 10 Days
FTT= 96%
OEE= 50%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 2%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 2- 5 Days
FTT= 94%
OEE= 65%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 4%
Uptime= 75%
EPEI = 1 – 2 Days
5
63
4
5
7
88
9
Expedited
10
8
20 min
1 Day 1 Day
30 min
2 Days
20 min
4 Days RM Production Lead Time = 8.3 Days
Processing Lead Time = 70 min. (0.6%)
Problems / Opportunities:1. Supplier incoming quality2. Excessive RM amounts3. Excessive rework4. Poor equipment availability (OEE)5. Excessive WIP amounts6. Excessive lead-times (Muda)7. Multiple scheduling points (Push)8. Group leader managing scheduling9. Excessive logistic touches10. Premium freight cost
Barriers
Barriers:• Supplier Quality System• Poor OEE (59%) at Fab. 2
Other Relevant Data
Operator Balance Chart
26
5260
54
2820
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Masco Washer Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
10
A3 – Document Initial Condition
Background / Business Case:
Project Name: Hose Line Productivity Improvement
1. Increasing customer expectations and pressure require improvements in quality, delivery, and cost.
2. Need to improve cost competitiveness.
Initial Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Final AssemblyFabrication #2Fabrication #1
MRP
Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
MRP
Component Control
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI)
Customer Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
ASN
Warehouse
RM IWIP
Warehouse
FG
Daily Schedule
Daily Ship Schedule
Shuttle
Shuttle
IWIP
1
2
FTT= 98%
OEE= 70%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 1%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 3 - 10 Days
FTT= 96%
OEE= 50%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 2%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 2- 5 Days
FTT= 94%
OEE= 65%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 4%
Uptime= 75%
EPEI = 1 – 2 Days
5
63
4
5
7
88
9
Expedited
10
8
20 min
1 Day 1 Day
30 min
2 Days
20 min
4 Days RM Production Lead Time = 8.3 Days
Processing Lead Time = 70 min. (0.6%)
Kanban Rack
Kanba
n R
ack
Kanba
n
Rack
HFV6 Jumper
Tube Punch
Sort
Ta
ble
Washer DrainRack
WasherDrainRack
FC
Bench
Tool Chest
2.7L EF1042
Bead Checker E
F0
05
3 -
Hit
EF0061 - Hit
WIP
Rack EF007
3 - Hit
EF008 EF009EF0012 - Hit
EF10412.7
EF0152 - Hit
DropAuto
Loader
2.7
L JR
& L
HS
kive &
Pun
ch
Loa
d
Unlo
ad
Ele
ctric 110
V
EF0042 - Hit
EF0042 - Hit Load Unload
EF
Mach
ine
EF
010
Robot
Guarding
Gu
ard
ing
Gu
ard
ing
Robot Controller
3
5
6
3
6
7
5
4
SP
C T
able
45
2
2
1
1
1
5
1
5
1
4
5
1
1
1
2
2
5
Template: Quick Connect - Red LineJumper - Blue Line
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Problems / Opportunities:1. Supplier incoming quality2. Excessive RM amounts3. Excessive rework4. Poor equipment availability (OEE)5. Excessive WIP amounts6. Excessive lead-times (Muda)7. Multiple scheduling points (Push)8. Group leader managing scheduling9. Excessive logistic touches10. Premium freight cost
Barriers:• Supplier Quality System• Poor OEE (59%) at Fab. 2
Operator Balance Chart
26
5260
54
2820
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Masco Washer Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
11
Prioritize Problems / Opportunities
Cost, Effort, Time
Impact1 2
3 4
StartHere
Work in this direction
Do not work here!
Work on High Impact, Low Effort ActivitiesWork on High Impact, Low Effort Activities
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
12
The LEAN Journey
Initial Condition
IDEAL Condition
•100% Value Add•0 Defects (Internal)•One Piece Continuous Flow•Human Development•Value to Society
•Hidden Waste (Problems)•Poor Equipment Efficiency•Poor Labor Efficiency•High Defect Rates•Large Batches• Infrequent improvement
Unclear Journey
Once the Initial Condition is thoroughly understood the next step is to define a Target Condition assuring a magnetic pull towards the Ideal Condition.
Target Condition
Unclear Journey
The Target Condition should be a short term vision that is attainable and measured in days/weeks not months/years.
Initial Condition
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
13
Define the Target Condition
Map the Future StateCustomer
Supplier
Pacemaker
Customer SpecificScheduling PointComplexity Split
Fabrication #2Fabrication #1
FIFO
Cross Dock or Supplier
Warehouse
MRP
AdP Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
Overseas Suppliers
MRP
AdP Component
Control
A
Source Global Feel Local
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI) Customer
Orders (Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
e-Kanban
3x Day
Green Loop (A Component Suppliers)
Line side “A” component Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
ASN
O X O X O X
RM located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
Warehouse (RM)
NAFTA Suppliers
RM delivered to POU locations established by value stream
(A Items) EPE Day or Shipment Window then
strive to shorten over time
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum
level inventoryCycle + Buffer + Safety Stocks
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum level
inventory
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
20 Min. Loops
1 Day on hand RM
Daily Deliveries
Key Process Indicators
Indicators: Current Target Delta
Lead Time 8.3 days 4.0 days -52%
WIP 12,168 7614 -37%
Productivity (MH/100)
6.00 4.78 -20%
Bubble Diagram (# Paths)
54 2 -96%
OBC (% over ideal)
25% 8% -68%
Verbal Description
• Reduce from 3 Operators to 2 in Upper Machining
• Elimination of 106 seconds of labor in Upper Machining
• OEE > 88% (with FWD)• OEE >70% (w/o FWD)
Other Graphical Analysis
Operator Balance Chart
6760
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Machining Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
14
A3 – Document Target Condition
Background / Business Case:
Project Name: Hose Line Productivity Improvement
1. Increasing customer expectations and pressure require improvements in quality, delivery, and cost.
2. Need to improve cost competitiveness.
Initial Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Final AssemblyFabrication #2Fabrication #1
MRP
Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
MRP
Component Control
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI)
Customer Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
ASN
Warehouse
RM IWIP
Warehouse
FG
Daily Schedule
Daily Ship Schedule
Shuttle
Shuttle
IWIP
1
2
FTT= 98%
OEE= 70%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 1%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 3 - 10 Days
FTT= 96%
OEE= 50%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 2%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 2- 5 Days
FTT= 94%
OEE= 65%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 4%
Uptime= 75%
EPEI = 1 – 2 Days
5
63
4
5
7
88
9
Expedited
10
8
20 min
1 Day 1 Day
30 min
2 Days
20 min
4 Days RM Production Lead Time = 8.3 Days
Processing Lead Time = 70 min. (0.6%)
Kanban Rack
Kanba
n R
ack
Kanba
n
Rack
HFV6 Jumper
Tube Punch
Sort
Ta
ble
Washer DrainRack
WasherDrainRack
FC
Bench
Tool Chest
2.7L EF1042
Bead Checker E
F0
05
3 -
Hit
EF0061 - Hit
WIP
Rack EF007
3 - Hit
EF008 EF009EF0012 - Hit
EF10412.7
EF0152 - Hit
DropAuto
Loader
2.7
L JR
& L
HS
kive &
Pun
ch
Loa
d
Unlo
ad
Ele
ctric 110
V
EF0042 - Hit
EF0042 - Hit Load Unload
EF
Mach
ine
EF
010
Robot
Guarding
Gu
ard
ing
Gu
ard
ing
Robot Controller
3
5
6
3
6
7
5
4
SP
C T
able
45
2
2
1
1
1
5
1
5
1
4
5
1
1
1
2
2
5
Template: Quick Connect - Red LineJumper - Blue Line
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Problems / Opportunities:1. Supplier incoming quality2. Excessive RM amounts3. Excessive rework4. Poor equipment availability (OEE)5. Excessive WIP amounts6. Excessive lead-times (Muda)7. Multiple scheduling points (Push)8. Group leader managing scheduling9. Excessive logistic touches10. Premium freight cost
Barriers:• Supplier Quality System• Poor OEE (59%) at Fab. 2
Operator Balance Chart
26
5260
54
2820
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Masco Washer Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
Target Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Pacemaker
Customer SpecificScheduling PointComplexity Split
Fabrication #2Fabrication #1
FIFO
Cross Dock or Supplier
Warehouse
MRP
AdP Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
Overseas Suppliers
MRP
AdP Component
Control
A
Source Global Feel Local
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI) Customer
Orders (Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
e-Kanban
3x Day
Green Loop (A Component Suppliers)
Line side “A” component Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
ASN
O X O X O X
RM located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
Warehouse (RM)
NAFTA Suppliers
RM delivered to POU locations established by value stream
(A Items) EPE Day or Shipment Window then
strive to shorten over time
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum
level inventoryCycle + Buffer + Safety Stocks
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum level
inventory
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
20 Min. Loops
1 Day on hand RM
Daily Deliveries
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Operator Balance Chart
6760
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Machining Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
• Reduce from 3 Operators to 2 in Upper Machining
• Elimination of 106 seconds of labor in Upper Machining
• OEE > 88% (with FWD)• OEE >70% (w/o FWD)
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
15
Create an Implementation Plan
Implementation:
# Task Resp.Person
Target Date
Feb 05
Mar 05
Apr 05
May 05
Jun 05
Jul 05
Aug 05
Sep 05
Oct 05
Nov 05
Review Review
1 Fix Clamping to eliminate operator checking clamp force
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
2 Reprogram Masco to separate operator from machine (PCT=88)
Grant Glasscock
5/1/05
3 Standardize Blow-off (PCT=77)
Brian Zolman
3/1/05
4 Improve clamp/ unclamp speed (PCT=75)
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
5 Improve fixture rotation rate (PCT=74)
Grant Glasscock
4/1/05
6 ROI Analysis: Re-balance Gantry (13 sec reduction)
Grant Glasscock
5/1/05
7 ROI Analysis: Re-balance Masco (PCT=70)
Matt Jacoby 5/1/05
8 ROI Analysis: Blow-off machine (PCT=63)
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
9 Reduce from 3 to 2 operators per shift on Lower Machining cell
Roger Marshall
7/1/05
10 Reduce from 3 to 2 operators per shift on Finishing cell
Roger Marshall
9/1/05
Task description with specific, quantifiable
expected resultsResponsible Person
3 Standardize Blow-off (PCT=77)
Planned Start / Completion
- Plan Start
- Act Start
- Plan Compl.
- Act. Compl.
- ReviewPlanning:
Periodic evaluation of progress against planned timing and
results
Evaluation:
X- On Target
- Behind Target
- In Trouble
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
16
A3 – Document Implementation Plan
Background / Business Case:
Project Name: Hose Line Productivity Improvement
1. Increasing customer expectations and pressure require improvements in quality, delivery, and cost.
2. Need to improve cost competitiveness.
Initial Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Final AssemblyFabrication #2Fabrication #1
MRP
Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
MRP
Component Control
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI)
Customer Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
ASN
Warehouse
RM IWIP
Warehouse
FG
Daily Schedule
Daily Ship Schedule
Shuttle
Shuttle
IWIP
1
2
FTT= 98%
OEE= 70%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 1%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 3 - 10 Days
FTT= 96%
OEE= 50%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 2%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 2- 5 Days
FTT= 94%
OEE= 65%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 4%
Uptime= 75%
EPEI = 1 – 2 Days
5
63
4
5
7
88
9
Expedited
10
8
20 min
1 Day 1 Day
30 min
2 Days
20 min
4 Days RM Production Lead Time = 8.3 Days
Processing Lead Time = 70 min. (0.6%)
Kanban Rack
Kanba
n R
ack
Kanba
n
Rack
HFV6 Jumper
Tube Punch
Sort
Ta
ble
Washer DrainRack
WasherDrainRack
FC
Bench
Tool Chest
2.7L EF1042
Bead Checker E
F0
05
3 -
Hit
EF0061 - Hit
WIP
Rack EF007
3 - Hit
EF008 EF009EF0012 - Hit
EF10412.7
EF0152 - Hit
Drop
Auto Loader
2.7
L JR
& L
HS
kive &
Pun
ch
Loa
d
Unlo
ad
Ele
ctric 110
V
EF0042 - Hit
EF0042 - Hit Load Unload
EF
Mach
ine
EF
010
Robot
Guarding
Gu
ard
ing
Gu
ard
ing
Robot Controller
3
5
6
3
6
7
5
4
SP
C T
able
45
2
2
1
1
1
5
1
5
1
4
5
1
1
1
2
2
5
Template: Quick Connect - Red LineJumper - Blue Line
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Problems / Opportunities:1. Supplier incoming quality2. Excessive RM amounts3. Excessive rework4. Poor equipment availability (OEE)5. Excessive WIP amounts6. Excessive lead-times (Muda)7. Multiple scheduling points (Push)8. Group leader managing scheduling9. Excessive logistic touches10. Premium freight cost
Barriers:• Supplier Quality System• Poor OEE (59%) at Fab. 2
Operator Balance Chart
26
5260
54
2820
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Masco Washer Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
Target Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Pacemaker
Customer SpecificScheduling PointComplexity Split
Fabrication #2Fabrication #1
FIFO
Cross Dock or Supplier
Warehouse
MRP
AdP Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
Overseas Suppliers
MRP
AdP Component
Control
A
Source Global Feel Local
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI) Customer
Orders (Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
e-Kanban
3x Day
Green Loop (A Component Suppliers)
Line side “A” component Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
ASN
O X O X O X
RM located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
Warehouse (RM)
NAFTA Suppliers
RM delivered to POU locations established by value stream
(A Items) EPE Day or Shipment Window then
strive to shorten over time
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum
level inventoryCycle + Buffer + Safety Stocks
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum level
inventory
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
20 Min. Loops
1 Day on hand RM
Daily Deliveries
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Operator Balance Chart
6760
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Machining Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
• Reduce from 3 Operators to 2 in Upper Machining
• Elimination of 106 seconds of labor in Upper Machining
• OEE > 88% (with FWD)• OEE >70% (w/o FWD)
Implementation:
Implementation:
# Task Resp.Person
Target Date
Feb 05
Mar 05
Apr 05
May 05
Jun 05
Jul 05
Aug 05
Sep 05
Oct 05
Nov 05
Review Review
1 Fix Clamping to eliminate operator checking clamp force
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
2 Reprogram Masco to separate operator from machine (PCT=88)
Grant Glasscock
5/1/05
3 Standardize Blow-off (PCT=77)
Brian Zolman
3/1/05
4 Improve clamp/ unclamp speed (PCT=75)
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
5 Improve fixture rotation rate (PCT=74)
Grant Glasscock
4/1/05
6 ROI Analysis: Re-balance Gantry (13 sec reduction)
Grant Glasscock
5/1/05
7 ROI Analysis: Re-balance Masco (PCT=70)
Matt Jacoby 5/1/05
8 ROI Analysis: Blow-off machine (PCT=63)
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
9 Reduce from 3 to 2 operators per shift on Lower Machining cell
Roger Marshall
7/1/05
10 Reduce from 3 to 2 operators per shift on Finishing cell
Roger Marshall
9/1/05
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
17
Identify Expected Results
Tangible Metric Improvements
Indicators: Current Target Delta Intangibles:
Lead Time 1.52 days .95 days -37% Less variation in the assembly process
Lower C/O time by 66%Similar results can be achieved on the
APOX1 and ASOX assembly linesLabor productivity stability at a wide
range of demandReduced material handling and
conveyance of WIP
WIP 12,168 7614 -37%
Productivity (MH/100) 6.00 4.78 -20%
Bubble Diagram (Paths) 54 2 -96%
OBC (% over ideal) 25% 8% -68%
WIP Value $13,624 $8,525 -$5,099
Labor Cost ($/year) $352,000 $253,500 -$98,500
Tangible Cost Improvements
Intangibles
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
18
A3 – Document the KPI’s and Expected Results
Background / Business Case:
Project Name: Hose Line Productivity Improvement
1. Increasing customer expectations and pressure require improvements in quality, delivery, and cost.
2. Need to improve cost competitiveness.
Initial Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Final AssemblyFabrication #2Fabrication #1
MRP
Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
MRP
Component Control
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI)
Customer Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
ASN
Warehouse
RM IWIP
Warehouse
FG
Daily Schedule
Daily Ship Schedule
Shuttle
Shuttle
IWIP
1
2
FTT= 98%
OEE= 70%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 1%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 3 - 10 Days
FTT= 96%
OEE= 50%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 2%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 2- 5 Days
FTT= 94%
OEE= 65%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 4%
Uptime= 75%
EPEI = 1 – 2 Days
5
63
4
5
7
88
9
Expedited
10
8
20 min
1 Day 1 Day
30 min
2 Days
20 min
4 Days RM Production Lead Time = 8.3 Days
Processing Lead Time = 70 min. (0.6%)
Kanban Rack
Kanba
n R
ack
Kanba
n
Rack
HFV6 Jumper
Tube Punch
Sort
Ta
ble
Washer DrainRack
WasherDrainRack
FC
Bench
Tool Chest
2.7L EF1042
Bead Checker E
F0
05
3 -
Hit
EF0061 - Hit
WIP
Rack EF007
3 - Hit
EF008 EF009EF0012 - Hit
EF10412.7
EF0152 - Hit
Drop
Auto Loader
2.7
L JR
& L
HS
kive &
Pun
ch
Loa
d
Unlo
ad
Ele
ctric 110
V
EF0042 - Hit
EF0042 - Hit Load Unload
EF
Mach
ine
EF
010
Robot
Guarding
Gu
ard
ing
Gu
ard
ing
Robot Controller
3
5
6
3
6
7
5
4
SP
C T
able
45
2
2
1
1
1
5
1
5
1
4
5
1
1
1
2
2
5
Template: Quick Connect - Red LineJumper - Blue Line
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Problems / Opportunities:1. Supplier incoming quality2. Excessive RM amounts3. Excessive rework4. Poor equipment availability (OEE)5. Excessive WIP amounts6. Excessive lead-times (Muda)7. Multiple scheduling points (Push)8. Group leader managing scheduling9. Excessive logistic touches10. Premium freight cost
Barriers:• Supplier Quality System• Poor OEE (59%) at Fab. 2
Operator Balance Chart
26
5260
54
2820
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Masco Washer Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
Target Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Pacemaker
Customer SpecificScheduling PointComplexity Split
Fabrication #2Fabrication #1
FIFO
Cross Dock or Supplier
Warehouse
MRP
AdP Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
Overseas Suppliers
MRP
AdP Component
Control
A
Source Global Feel Local
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI) Customer
Orders (Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
e-Kanban
3x Day
Green Loop (A Component Suppliers)
Line side “A” component Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
ASN
O X O X O X
RM located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
Warehouse (RM)
NAFTA Suppliers
RM delivered to POU locations established by value stream
(A Items) EPE Day or Shipment Window then
strive to shorten over time
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum
level inventoryCycle + Buffer + Safety Stocks
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum level
inventory
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
20 Min. Loops
1 Day on hand RM
Daily Deliveries
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Operator Balance Chart
6760
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Machining Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
• Reduce from 3 Operators to 2 in Upper Machining
• Elimination of 106 seconds of labor in Upper Machining
• OEE > 88% (with FWD)• OEE >70% (w/o FWD)
Implementation:
Implementation:
# Task Resp.Person
Target Date
Feb 05
Mar 05
Apr 05
May 05
Jun 05
Jul 05
Aug 05
Sep 05
Oct 05
Nov 05
Review Review
1 Fix Clamping to eliminate operator checking clamp force
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
2 Reprogram Masco to separate operator from machine (PCT=88)
Grant Glasscock
5/1/05
3 Standardize Blow-off (PCT=77)
Brian Zolman
3/1/05
4 Improve clamp/ unclamp speed (PCT=75)
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
5 Improve fixture rotation rate (PCT=74)
Grant Glasscock
4/1/05
6 ROI Analysis: Re-balance Gantry (13 sec reduction)
Grant Glasscock
5/1/05
7 ROI Analysis: Re-balance Masco (PCT=70)
Matt Jacoby 5/1/05
8 ROI Analysis: Blow-off machine (PCT=63)
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
9 Reduce from 3 to 2 operators per shift on Lower Machining cell
Roger Marshall
7/1/05
10 Reduce from 3 to 2 operators per shift on Finishing cell
Roger Marshall
9/1/05
Indicators
Indicators: Current Target Delta Intangibles:
Lead Time 1.52 days .95 days -37% Less variation in the assembly process Lower C/O time by 66% Similar results can be achieved on the
APOX1 and ASOX assembly lines Labor productivity stability at a wide
range of demand Reduced material handling and
conveyance of WIP
WIP 12,168 7614 -37%
Productivity (MH/100) 6.00 4.78 -20%
Bubble Diagram (Paths) 54 2 -96%
OBC (% over ideal) 25% 8% -68%
WIP Value $13,624 $8,525 -$5,099
Labor Cost ($/year) $352,000 $253,500 -$98,500
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
19
Seek Project Approval
Project Team Leader
Project Team Leader:Roger Smith
Team Members:Jim Fisher, Mark JohnsonSara LewisJohn Davis
Management:Tom Burdette
Team MembersManagement
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
20
A3 – Document Project Approval
Background / Business Case:
Project Name: Hose Line Productivity Improvement
1. Increasing customer expectations and pressure require improvements in quality, delivery, and cost.
2. Need to improve cost competitiveness.
Initial Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Final AssemblyFabrication #2Fabrication #1
MRP
Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
MRP
Component Control
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI)
Customer Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
ASN
Warehouse
RM IWIP
Warehouse
FG
Daily Schedule
Daily Ship Schedule
Shuttle
Shuttle
IWIP
1
2
FTT= 98%
OEE= 70%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 1%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 3 - 10 Days
FTT= 96%
OEE= 50%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 2%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 2- 5 Days
FTT= 94%
OEE= 65%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 4%
Uptime= 75%
EPEI = 1 – 2 Days
5
63
4
5
7
88
9
Expedited
10
8
20 min
1 Day 1 Day
30 min
2 Days
20 min
4 Days RM Production Lead Time = 8.3 Days
Processing Lead Time = 70 min. (0.6%)
Kanban Rack
Kanba
n R
ack
Kanba
n
Rack
HFV6 Jumper
Tube Punch
Sort
Ta
ble
Washer DrainRack
WasherDrainRack
FC
Bench
Tool Chest
2.7L EF1042
Bead Checker E
F0
05
3 -
Hit
EF0061 - Hit
WIP
Rack EF007
3 - Hit
EF008 EF009EF0012 - Hit
EF10412.7
EF0152 - Hit
Drop
Auto Loader
2.7
L JR
& L
HS
kive &
Pun
ch
Loa
d
Unlo
ad
Ele
ctric 110
V
EF0042 - Hit
EF0042 - Hit Load Unload
EF
Mach
ine
EF
010
Robot
Guarding
Gu
ard
ing
Gu
ard
ing
Robot Controller
3
5
6
3
6
7
5
4
SP
C T
able
45
2
2
1
1
1
5
1
5
1
4
5
1
1
1
2
2
5
Template: Quick Connect - Red LineJumper - Blue Line
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Problems / Opportunities:1. Supplier incoming quality2. Excessive RM amounts3. Excessive rework4. Poor equipment availability (OEE)5. Excessive WIP amounts6. Excessive lead-times (Muda)7. Multiple scheduling points (Push)8. Group leader managing scheduling9. Excessive logistic touches10. Premium freight cost
Barriers:• Supplier Quality System• Poor OEE (59%) at Fab. 2
Operator Balance Chart
26
5260
54
2820
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Masco Washer Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
Target Condition:
CustomerSupplier
Pacemaker
Customer SpecificScheduling PointComplexity Split
Fabrication #2Fabrication #1
FIFO
Cross Dock or Supplier
Warehouse
MRP
AdP Finished Goods Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
Overseas Suppliers
MRP
AdP Component
Control
A
Source Global Feel Local
Supplier Orders (Weekly EDI) Customer
Orders (Weekly EDI)
Daily Orders
e-Kanban
3x Day
Green Loop (A Component Suppliers)
Line side “A” component Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG Supermarket MIN/MAX
FG located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
ASN
O X O X O X
RM located/visualized in
manufacturing building warehouse
Warehouse (RM)
NAFTA Suppliers
RM delivered to POU locations established by value stream
(A Items) EPE Day or Shipment Window then
strive to shorten over time
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum
level inventoryCycle + Buffer + Safety Stocks
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
Ridged MIN/MAX Rules – Minimum level
inventory
EPEI Goal to match the pacemaker
20 Min. Loops
1 Day on hand RM
Daily Deliveries
Masco
RawWIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-hofff
C
BushingPress
GantryLoad
Operator Balance Chart
6760
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Machining Inspect/Pack
Value-Added Waiting Takt
• Reduce from 3 Operators to 2 in Upper Machining
• Elimination of 106 seconds of labor in Upper Machining
• OEE > 88% (with FWD)• OEE >70% (w/o FWD)
Implementation:
Implementation:
# Task Resp.Person
Target Date
Feb 05
Mar 05
Apr 05
May 05
Jun 05
Jul 05
Aug 05
Sep 05
Oct 05
Nov 05
Review Review
1 Fix Clamping to eliminate operator checking clamp force
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
2 Reprogram Masco to separate operator from machine (PCT=88)
Grant Glasscock
5/1/05
3 Standardize Blow-off (PCT=77)
Brian Zolman
3/1/05
4 Improve clamp/ unclamp speed (PCT=75)
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
5 Improve fixture rotation rate (PCT=74)
Grant Glasscock
4/1/05
6 ROI Analysis: Re-balance Gantry (13 sec reduction)
Grant Glasscock
5/1/05
7 ROI Analysis: Re-balance Masco (PCT=70)
Matt Jacoby 5/1/05
8 ROI Analysis: Blow-off machine (PCT=63)
Roger Marshall
4/1/05
9 Reduce from 3 to 2 operators per shift on Lower Machining cell
Roger Marshall
7/1/05
10 Reduce from 3 to 2 operators per shift on Finishing cell
Roger Marshall
9/1/05
Indicators
Indicators: Current Target Delta Intangibles:
Lead Time 1.52 days .95 days -37% Less variation in the assembly process Lower C/O time by 66% Similar results can be achieved on the
APOX1 and ASOX assembly lines Labor productivity stability at a wide
range of demand Reduced material handling and
conveyance of WIP
WIP 12,168 7614 -37%
Productivity (MH/100) 6.00 4.78 -20%
Bubble Diagram (Paths) 54 2 -96%
OBC (% over ideal) 25% 8% -68%
WIP Value $13,624 $8,525 -$5,099
Labor Cost ($/year) $352,000 $253,500 -$98,500
Approval Project Team Leader:Roger Smith
Team Members:Jim Fisher, Mark JohnsonSara LewisJohn Davis
Management:Tom Burdette
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
21
The LEAN Journey
Now its time to work the plan. As you move forward on this journey additional barriers will be encountered.
Initial Condition
IDEAL Condition
•Hidden Waste (Problems)•Poor Equipment Efficiency•Poor Labor Efficiency•High Defect Rates•Large Batches• Infrequent improvement
Target Condition
Unclear Journey
•100% Value Add•0 Defects (Internal)•One Piece Continuous Flow•Human Development•Value to Society
Dodging barriers leads you away from the Ideal Condition. Barriers must be met head-on and eliminated!
Solutions to problems cannot involve diverting off the path to the Ideal Condition!
There can be no shortcuts!
Clear Plan
Barriers
Plan
Do
Check
ActGrasp
the Situation
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
22
The LEAN Journey
To achieve sustainability it is important to stabilize and standardize the system improvements; otherwise, improvements will regress over time.
Initial Condition
IDEAL Condition
•Hidden Waste (Problems)•Poor Equipment Efficiency•Poor Labor Efficiency•High Defect Rates•Large Batches• Infrequent improvement
Unclear Journey
•100% Value Add•0 Defects (Internal)•One Piece Continuous Flow•Human Development•Value to Society
The sustainability of system improvements will be achieved by the standardization and is the basis for the next improvement steps.
The standardization allows:• To measure and evaluate improvements.• The exchange of best practices with similar and equal tasks.
Standards
Target ConditionCurrent
State
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
23
Approach
Quick wins using Lean methodologies.
Always tie projects to dollars. Establish
measurable benefits expected from each
project.
Quick pace of implementation
requires removal of organizational and
bureaucratic barriers.
04/09/2023
“You
r V
alu
e S
trea
m I
mpr
ovem
ent C
oach
”
24
Process
Go to the Gemba for data.
“Grasp the Situation”
Start where the business need is
greatest. Select projects that yield the greatest
impact.
A3 is a “working document”.
“Nemawashi”.
Prepare the ground for planting.
A consistent process is used repeatedly.
Background / Business Case:
1. Increasing customer expectations and pressure require
improvements in quality, delivery, and cost.
2. Need to improve cost competitiveness.
Project Name: Hose Line Productivity Improvement
A3 – Document Project Approval
Initial Conditio
n:
Customer
Supplier Final Assembly
Fabrication #2
Fabrication #1
MRP
Finished
Goods
Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
MRP
Component
Control
Supplier Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Customer
Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily
Orders
ASN
Warehouse
RM
IWIP
Warehouse
FG
Daily Schedule
Daily Ship
Schedule
Shuttle
Shuttle
IWIP
1
2
FTT= 98%
OEE= 70%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 1%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 3 - 1
0 Days
FTT= 96%
OEE= 50%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 2%
Uptime= 70%
EPEI = 2- 5
Days
FTT= 94%
OEE= 65%
Scrap= 2%
Rework= 4%
Uptime= 75%
EPEI = 1 – 2 Days
5
6
3
4
5
7
8
8
9
Expedited
10
8
20 min
1 Day
1 Day
30 min
2 Days
20 min
4 Days RM
Production Lead Time =
8.3 Days
Processing Lead Time
= 70 min. (0.6%)
Kanban Rack
Kan
ban
Rack
Kan
ban
Rack
HFV6
Jumper
Tube
Punch
Sort
Table
Washer
Drain
Rack
Washer
Drain
Rack
FCB
ench
Tool Chest
2.7L
EF1042
Value
Stream Map
Description "Dana Current Future State Map"
Endform Spaghetti Diagram
SIZE
File Name
Drawn By:
REV
B
SHEET
1 OF 1
Bead
Checker
EF0
05
3 -
Hit
EF006
1 - Hit
WIP
Rack
EF007
3 - Hit
EF008
EF009
EF001
2 - Hit
EF1041
2.7
EF015
2 - Hit
Cylinder
Drop
Auto
Loader
2.7L JR &
LH
Skive &
Punch
Load
Unload
Electri c
110V
EF004
2 - HitEF004
2 - Hit
Load Unload
EF Machi ne
EF010
Robot
Guarding
Gua
rdin
g
Guard ing
Robot
Controller
3
5
6
3
6
7
5
4
SP
C T
able
4
5
2
21
1
1
5
1
5
1
4
511
1
2
2
5
Seperate
Workshop
Template:
Quick Connect - Red Line
Jumper - Blue Line
Masco
Raw
WIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-
hofffC
Bushing
Press
Gantry
Load
Problems / Opportu
nities:
1. Supplier in
coming quality
2. Excessive RM amounts
3. Excessive rework
4. Poor equipment availability
(OEE)
5. Excessive WIP amounts
6. Excessive lead-tim
es (Muda)
7. Multip
le scheduling points (Push)
8. Group leader m
anaging scheduling
9. Excessive logistic touches
10. Premium fre
ight cost
Barriers:
•Supplier Quality
System
•Poor O
EE (59%) at Fab. 2
Operator Balance Chart
26
52
60
54
28
20
Value-AddedWaiting
Takt
Target Condition:
Customer
SupplierPacemaker
Customer Specific
Scheduling Point
Complexity Split
Fabrication #2
Fabrication #1
FIFOCross Dock or
Supplier
Warehouse
MRP
AdP
Finished
Goods
Control
Daily
Customer Schedule
Overseas
Suppliers
MRP
AdP
Component
Control
A
Source Global Feel Local
Supplier Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Customer
Orders
(Weekly EDI)
Daily
Orders
e-Kanban
3x Day
Green Loop (A Component Suppliers)
Line side “A” c
omponent
Supermarket M
IN/MAX
FG Supermarket
MIN/MAX
FG located/
visualized in
manufacturing
building warehouse
ASN
O X O X O X
RM located/
visualized in
manufacturing
building warehouse
Warehouse (RM)
NAFTA
Suppliers
RM delivered to POU locations
established by value stream(A Ite
ms) EPE Day or
Shipment Window then
strive to shorten over tim
e
Ridged MIN/MAX
Rules – Minimum
level inventory
Cycle + Buffer +
Safety Stocks
EPEI Goal to
match the
pacemaker
Ridged MIN/MAX
Rules – Minimum level
inventory
EPEI Goal to
match
the pacemaker
20 Min. Loops
1 Day on hand RM
Daily Deliveries
MascoRaw
WIP
Raw
A
B
Ranso-
hofffC
Bushing
Press
Gantry
Load
Operator Balance Chart
67
60
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
MachiningInspect/Pack
Value-AddedWaiting
Takt
•Reduce from 3 Operators to 2 in Upper
Machining
•Elimination of 106 seconds of labor in Upper
Machining
•OEE > 88% (with FWD)
•OEE >70% (w/o FWD)
Implementation:
Implementation:
#
Task
Resp.
Person
Target
Date
Feb
05
Mar
05
Apr
05
May
05
Jun
05
Jul
05
Aug
05
Sep
05
Oct
05
Nov
05
ReviewReview
1Fix Clamping to
eliminate operator
checking clamp force
Roger
Marshall
4/1/05
2Reprogram Masco to
separate operator from
machine (PCT=88)
Grant
Glasscock
5/1/05
3Standardize Blow-off
(PCT=77)
Brian
Zolman
3/1/05
4Improve clamp/
unclamp speed
(PCT=75)
Roger
Marshall
4/1/05
5Improve fixture rotation
rate (PCT=74)
Grant
Glasscock
4/1/05
6ROI Analysis: R
e-
balance Gantry (13 sec
reduction)
Grant
Glasscock
5/1/05
7ROI Analysis: R
e-
balance Masco
(PCT=70)
Matt Jacoby 5/1/05
8ROI Analysis: Blow-off
machine (PCT=63)
Roger
Marshall
4/1/05
9Reduce fro
m 3 to 2
operators per shift on
Lower Machining cell
Roger
Marshall
7/1/05
10Reduce fro
m 3 to 2
operators per shift on
Finishing cell
Roger
Marshall
9/1/05
Indicators
Indicators:
CurrentTarget
Delta
Intangibles:
Lead Time
1.52 days.95 days
-37%
Less variation in the assembly process
Lower C/O time by 66%
Similar results can be achieved on the
APOX1 and ASOX assembly lines
Labor productivity stability at a wide
range of demand
Reduced material handling and
conveyance of WIP
WIP
12,168
7614
-37%
Productivity (MH/100)
6.00
4.78
-20%
Bubble Diagram (Paths)
54
2
-96%
OBC (% over ideal)
25%
8%
-68%
WIP Value
$13,624
$8,525
-$5,099
Labor Cost ($/year)
$352,000
$253,500
-$98,500
ApprovalProject Team Leader:
Roger Smith
Team Members:
J im Fisher,
J ohn Davis
Mark J ohnson Scott E
ric
Sara Lewis
Management:
Tom Burdette
Plan
Do
Check
ActGrasp the
SituationStandardize
04/09/2023