Page 1
Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized
Cucurbit[n]urils and Exploration of their
Applications
by
Shuai Zhang
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry
Approved Dissertation Committee
Prof. Dr. Werner M. Nau, Jacobs University Bremen
Prof. Dr. Mathias Winterhalter, Jacobs University Bremen
Prof. Dr. Uwe Pischel, University of Huelva
Dr. Andreas Hennig, Jacobs University Bremen
Date of Defense: 26th June, 2019 9
Department of Life Sciences and Chemistry
Page 2
To my dear Grandma
Page 3
i
Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................... iii
Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... v
List of Publications ................................................................................................................. vii
Participation in Scientific Conferences ................................................................................. ix
Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Supramolecular Chemistry ............................................................................................... 3
1.2 Supramolecular Chemistry of Cucurbit[n]urils ................................................................ 4
1.2.1 Basic Properties of Cucurbit[n]urils .......................................................................... 5
1.2.2 Specific Host–Guest Binding of Cucurbit[n]urils ...................................................... 8
1.3 Functionalization of CBn and Their Applications .......................................................... 10
1.4 Cu (I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition .............................................................. 12
1.5 Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) .................................................................. 14
1.6 References ...................................................................................................................... 16
Chapter 2. Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7 ............................................ 25
2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 27
2.2 Synthesis and Separation of CBn ................................................................................... 28
2.3 Synthesis of CB6-OH and CB7-OH ............................................................................... 29
2.4 Synthesis of CB6-OPr and CB7-OPr .............................................................................. 31
2.5 Synthesis of CB6-Carboxyfluorescein (CB6-CF) .......................................................... 34
2.6 Designed FRET Pair Based on CB6-CF and R-S ........................................................... 35
2.6.1 Spectral Characterization of the Designed FRET pair ............................................. 37
2.6.2 Spectral Properties of the Designed FRET Pair ....................................................... 37
2.6.3 Quenching Mechanism ............................................................................................ 39
2.7 Further Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB7 ............................................................ 40
2.8 References ...................................................................................................................... 45
Chapter 3. Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair ............................... 47
3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 49
3.2 Synthesis of CB7-CF ...................................................................................................... 50
3.3 Optical Characterizations of FRET Pair ......................................................................... 51
3.4 DNA Sensing by FRET Pair ........................................................................................... 56
3.5 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 58
3.6 References ...................................................................................................................... 58
Chapter 4. Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer
Micro- and Nanoparticles ...................................................................................................... 63
Page 4
ii
4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 65
4.2 Particle Synthesis ............................................................................................................ 67
4.3 Quantification of Surface-Bound CB7 ........................................................................... 68
4.4 Supramolecular Surface Functionalization ..................................................................... 72
4.5 Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities ................................................ 76
4.6 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 80
4.7 References ...................................................................................................................... 80
Summary and Outlook ........................................................................................................... 87
Appendices .............................................................................................................................. 89
Supporting Information for Chapter 3 .................................................................................. 91
Supporting Information for Chapter 4 .................................................................................. 99
Curriculum Vitae ................................................................................................................. 121
Page 5
iii
Abstract
The present doctoral thesis describes the synthetic procedure of clickable mono-functionalized
cucurbit[n]urils (n = 6, 7) and mainly on the exploration of new applications based on the mono-
functionalized CBn. In principle, with the functionalized clickable group, various
functionalized CBn derivatives can be achieved. One explored application is based on the
functionalization of CB7 on the surface of nano-/macro-particles, thus can be applied to
quantify the surface coverage densities of particles. The other one is based on a chromophore
attached to CB7 which makes the host molecule fluorescent and enables it to form a host-guest
FRET pair with a corresponding fluorescent guest, which can be applied to DNA sensing.
Besides these, the binding constants between CBn and inorganic cations were systematically
studied.
The first part of the thesis focuses on the synthesis and characterizations of mono-
functionalized CB6 and CB7, including mono-hydroxylated CB6 or CB7, propargyl attached
CB6 or CB7, and fluorophore attached CB6 or CB7, and related compounds.
The second part of the thesis reports a host-guest FRET pair based on the macrocyclic
host CB7 labelled with carboxyfluorescein as acceptor and the nucleic stain DAPI as donor and
guest. This supramolecular FRET pair is to be used for quantitative sensing of DNA with an
excellent linear dependence of the ratiometric fluorescence intensities. Such approach can be
applied to quantify DNA accurately and potentially be used in real-time PCR.
The third part of the thesis demonstrates a strategic supramolecular application to
precisely control the coverage densities on the surface of nano-/macro-particles. The key is to
functionalize CB7 on the surface of particles. After that, incubation of CB7-functionalized
particles with two high-affinity guests, resulted in a simple linear relationship between surface
coverage densities of one fluorescent guest and the mole fraction of this guest in the incubation
mixture. This suggests a highly modular supramolecular strategy for the stable immobilization
of application-relevant molecules on particle surfaces and a precise control of their surface
coverage densities.
In the last part, I summarize the main projects during my PhD and give the outlook about
exploring more applications based on mono-functionalized CB7.
Page 7
v
Acknowledgements
First of all, I would like to express my great appreciation to my supervisors, Prof. Dr. Werner
Nau and Dr. Andreas Hennig, for their patient guidance, thoughtful discussions, and
enthusiastic encouragement. I am thankful to Prof. Dr. Werner Nau, who gave me a chance to
study in supramolecular chemistry, provided me with scientific insights throughout my doctoral
studies, and encouraged me not to give up when I felt very frustrated in my second year. His
positive attitude motivates me not only in research work but also in my life outside the lab. And
I am thankful to Dr. Andreas Hennig, who led me into my beloved research topic-material
science. Without his continuous support and supervision, I would not have been able to finish
the most interesting project during my PhD.
I would also like to thank my former and present colleagues I worked with during my
four-year study in the Nau group for providing a very harmonious and knowledgeable
environment. In particular, I am thankful to Ms. Yan-cen Liu for helpful discussions about
fundamental knowledge of supramolecular chemistry and all the fun during our many trips in
Germany. I thank Dr. Khaleel I. Assaf for answering my questions all the time with patience
and a smile, for his guidance on NMR analysis and his encouragement from time to time. I
thank Dr. Chusen Huang for his guidance with cell culture experiments and fruitful suggestions
in one of my research projects. I thank Dr. Maik Jacob for his help to calculate the Förster
distance. I thank Dr. Andrea Barba-Bon for the help in running the first column in my life and
the beautiful memory of our Berlin trip. I thank Dr. Suhang He, Mr. Mohammad Ata Alnajjar,
Mr. Nilam Mohamed, and Ms. Yao Chen for sharing with me a pleasant time in the lab. Also,
I thank Dipl.-Chem. Thomas Schwarzlose for his encouragement and help. I thank Dr. Frank
Biedermann, Dr. Haibo Zhang, and Dr. Xiaojuan Wang for the shared projects.
I thank Prof. Mathias Winterhalter and Prof. Dr. Uwe Pischel for being kind enough to
act as committee members of my doctoral defence.
I am thankful to the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for the financial support of my
4-year doctoral study. Also, I am thankful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for
the financial support for the attendance of the 5th ICCB conference in 2017 and the SupraChem
conference in 2019.
My special thanks are extended to my grandmother, my parents, and my brother. I thank
them for always being there for me, both financially and emotionally, which gives me courage
and confidence to live abroad for such a long time.
Page 8
vi
Last but not the least, I would like to thank my dearest husband, Xiaofei, for his
everlasting love, perpetual understanding, constant encouragement, and endless support.
Page 9
vii
List of Publications
1. Shuai Zhang, Khaleel I. Assaf, Chusen Huang, Andreas Hennig, and Werner M. Nau.
“Ratiometric DNA sensing with a host–guest FRET pair.” Chemical Communications, 2019,
55, 671-674.
2. Huang, Haihong, Baosheng Ge, Shuai Zhang, Jiqiang Li, Chenghao Sun, Tongtao Yue, and
Fang Huang. “Using Fluorescence Quenching Titration to Determine the Orientation of a
Model Transmembrane Protein in Mimic Membranes.” Materials, 2019, 12, 349.
3. Huang, Haihong, Baosheng Ge, Chenghao Sun, Shuai Zhang, and Fang Huang. “Membrane
Curvature affects the Stability and Folding Kinetics of Bacteriorhodopsin.” Process
Biochemistry, 2019, 76, 111-117.
4. Shuai Zhang, Zoe Domínguez, Khaleel I. Assaf, Mohamed Nilam, Thomas Thiele, Uwe
Pischel, Uwe Schedler, Werner M. Nau, and Andreas Hennig. “Precise supramolecular control
of surface coverage densities on polymer micro-and nanoparticles.” Chemical Science, 2018,
9, 8575-8581.
5. Wang, Wenjing, Xiaoqiang Wang, Jin Cao, Jun Liu, Bin Qi, Xiaohai Zhou, Shuai Zhang,
Detlef Gabel, Werner M. Nau, Khaleel I. Assaf, and Haibo Zhang. “The Chaotropic Effect as
an Orthogonal Assembly Motif for Multi-responsive Dodecaborate-cucurbituril
Supramolecular Networks.” Chemical Communications, 2018, 54, 2098-2101.
6. Qi, Bin, Chenchen Wu, Ling Xu, Wenjing Wang, Jin Cao, Jun Liu, Shuai Zhang, Detlef
Gabel, Haibo Zhang, and Xiaohai Zhou. “From Boron Clusters to Gold Clusters: New Label-
free Colorimetric Sensors.” Chemical Communications, 2017, 53, 11790-11793.
7. Wang, Xiaojuan, Yanan Wang, Hua He, Xiqi Ma, Qi Chen, Shuai Zhang, Baosheng Ge,
Shengjie Wang, Werner M. Nau, and Fang Huang. “Deep-red Fluorescent Gold Nanoclusters
for Nucleoli Staining: Real-time Monitoring of the Nucleolar Dynamics in Reverse
Transformation of Malignant cells.” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9, 17799-
17806.
8. Yue, Tongtao, Mingbin Sun, Shuai Zhang, Hao Ren, Baosheng Ge, and Fang Huang. “How
transmembrane peptides insert and orientate in biomembranes: a combined experimental and
simulation study.” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2016, 18, 17483-17494.
Page 10
viii
9. Norouzy, Amir, Khaleel I. Assaf, Shuai Zhang, Maik H. Jacob, and Werner M. Nau.
“Coulomb Repulsion in Short Polypeptides.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2014, 119,
33-43.
10. Ge, Baosheng, Yan Li, Haixiang Sun, Shuai Zhang, Peijie Hu, Song Qin, and Fang Huang.
“Combinational Biosynthesis of Phycocyanobilin using Genetically-engineered Escherichia
Coli.” Biotechnology Letters, 2013, 35, 689-693.
Manuscript in Preparation
Shuai Zhang, Laura Grimm, Frank Biedermann and Werner M. Nau. “Systematic Investigation
on Binding Affinities of Cucurbit[n]uril with Common Cations.” Manuscript in preparation.
Page 11
ix
Participation in Scientific Conferences
1. 02/2019 SupraChem 2019, Würzburg, Germany. Poster entitled: “Ratiometric DNA
sensing with a host–guest FRET pair”.
2. 06/2016 5th International Conference on Cucurbiturils (ICCB), Brno, Czech Republic.
Poster entitled “Cucurbit[7]uril-Functionalized Polymer Microparticles”.
Page 13
Chapter 1 Introduction
1
Chapter 1. Introduction
Page 14
Chapter 1 Introduction
2
Page 15
Chapter 1 Introduction
3
1.1 Supramolecular Chemistry
Supramolecular chemistry, which is one of the today’s most interested research fields in
chemistry, was introduced by Jean-Marie Lehn in 1978 for the definition, consolidation and
generalization of the domain of crown ether chemistry, the chemistry of molecular recognition,
and host-guest chemistry. In 1967, Charles Pederson had investigated the selective binding of
crown ethers to specific metals and cation transfer in biphasic solvent.1 This accidental
discovery paved the way for Donald J. Cram and Jean-Marie Lehn to express their creativity in
unique ways and wholly develop the field of supramolecular chemistry.2-4 They were jointly
awarded the 1987 Nobel Prize in chemistry for a recognition of crown ether, host-guest and
molecular recognition chemistries.
Supramolecular chemistry has been described as “chemistry beyond the molecule”.
Over the past 50 years, this field has grown into a major branch of chemistry and has promoted
innumerable developments: from fundamental knowledge to practical applications, from
noncovalent interactions to drug delivery, and from polymer materials to solid-state
engineering. As a result, it has led to the appearance and establishment of supramolecular
science and technology, as a wide range of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary field that
provides highly fertile soil for scientists’ creativity in all disciplines.
The importance of supramolecular chemistry was again established by the 2016 Nobel
Prize for Chemistry, which was awarded to Jean-Pierre Sauvage, Sir J. Fraser Stoddart, and
Bernard L. Feringa in recognition of their work in molecular machines, in which
supramolecular chemistry was basic in showing the noncovalent bond into visibility.
Particularly, they used supramolecular chemistry as a kit to create mechanical power, promoting
molecules that can operate as machines, including molecular knots,5, 6 molecular elevator,7, 8
molecular motor9, 10 and nanocar.11
Until now, numerous families of supramolecular host molecules (natural and synthetic)
have been reported and investigated. Cucurbit[n]urils (CBn) as one of most young macrocycles
is very much related to my research during my 4-year PhD study. Therefore, in Chapter 1 I will
focus on the CBn properties, functionalizations and applications, as well as the mechanisms of
Cu(I)–catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition related to CBn functionalizations and the principle
of förster resonance energy transfer associated with CBn applications.
Page 16
Chapter 1 Introduction
4
1.2 Supramolecular Chemistry of Cucurbit[n]urils
Cucurbit[n]urils (CBn, n = 5-8, 10, 13-15) are cyclic oligomers composed of different glycoluril
units connected by methylene groups (Figure 1.1), which represent as a remarkable water
soluble molecular hosts. CB6 was the first one to be synthesized in 1905 by Behrend,12 but its
structure was not shown until 1981.13 Shortly after 2000 CBn family was expanded to have
more species, such as CB5, CB7, CB8 and CB10, by Kim,14, 15 Day16, 17 and Isaacs.18-20
Recently, CB13, CB14 and CB15 which show twisted crystal structures (Figure 1.2) have been
discovered by Tao.21, 22 In the recent two decades, although applications of large CBn are very
limited, CBn (n = 5-8) have been well explored in fundamental and applied science, including
formation of supramolecular hydrogels,23-25 supramolecular tandem enzyme assays,26-29
catalysis,30-32 biological molecules recognition,33-36 and materials science.37-41
Figure 1.1 Chemical structures of CB5, CB6, CB7 and CB8.
Figure 1.2 X-ray crystal structure of twisted CB14, hydrogen atoms are hidden for clarity.22
Page 17
Chapter 1 Introduction
5
1.2.1 Basic Properties of Cucurbit[n]urils
CBn are barrel-shaped macrocycles with highly symmetric structure, negatively charged
carbonyl portal and hydrophobic cavity. Like the cyclodextrins, the CBn homologues have the
same depth (9.1 Å), but their portal diameter, inner cavity diameter and cavity volume vary
systematically with the number of united glycoluril units (Figure 1.3 and 1.4). The CBn
structures are rather rigid, so the suitable guests for CBn to form host-guest complex are size
selective. As shown in Table 1.1, the thermal stability of CBn is high enough for CBn to keep
complete structure under 370 °C. The solubility of CBn varies on sizes, CB5 and CB7 show
modest solubility in water, but CB6 and CB8 are slightly soluble in water. Therefore, the poor
solubility of CB6 and CB8 is one of the limitations of the CBn family to be explored for some
applications in aqueous solution.
Figure 1.3 Model of the strict CBn macrocycles.
Table 1.1 Physical properties of CBn (n = 5-8).
CBn p (Å) d (Å) h (Å) V(Å3) s (mM) Stability (°C)
CB5 2.4 4.4 9.1 68 20-30 420
CB6 3.9 5.8 9.1 142 0.01842 42543
CB7 5.4 7.3 9.1 242 20-30 370
CB8 6.9 8.8 9.1 367 0.01 420
p: portal diameter; d: inner cavity diameter; h: the height; V: cavity volume;
s: water solubility; Values are taken from ref.15, 42, 43.
Not only the size of portal decides what kind of guest fits with CBn, but also the packing
coefficient (PC). PC representing the ratio of the guest size and the host cavity volume, as one
of testing standards to estimate the fit goodness of host-guest complex, was introduced by
Rebek and Mecozzi in 1998.44 A value of ca. 0.55 was reported to get the best binding between
host and guest molecules, while larger or smaller PC value accompanied by lower affinities.
PC value has been proven useful for a couple of macrocyclic hosts, as well as CBn, which was
reported by Nau group to be applied for predicting the stability of CBn complex successfully.45
Page 18
Chapter 1 Introduction
6
Figure 1.4 (a) Top and side views of different cavity definitions. (b) Schematic illustration of
an ideal cavity filling of 55% by encapsulation of a spherical guest. Reprinted by permission
from ref.46.
The CBn host-guest chemistry is obviously and intuitively related with dimensions of
CBn structures, also with other driving forces, such as electrostatic effect and hydrophobic
effect. Electrostatic effect plays an important role in biochemical molecular recognitions47, as
well as in supramolecular chemistry.48 Figuer 1.5 shows the calculated electrostatic potential of
CBn (n = 5-8), which spotlights the preference of the positive charge associated and the
reluctance of the anions with the portals of CBn.19, 49
Indeed, the electrostatic potential has a significant influence for the recognition behavior
of CBn. The first reports of CBn complex was formed with metal cations being as a lid bound
to the portals of CBn.50 The common cations (inclusive of alkali and alkaline earth metal
cations,50-54 transition metal cations,55, 56 lanthanides and actinides,57-59 as well as ammonium
ions60) have been proven to bind with CBn with varying affinities and increase the CBn
solubility significantly.
Page 19
Chapter 1 Introduction
7
Figure 1.5 Calculated electrostatic potential (EP) at the B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory for (a)
CB5, (b) CB6, (c) CB7, and (d) CB8 in the h plane (left) and in the v plane (right). Reprinted
by permission from ref. 61.
Figure 1.6 Schematic illustration of the release of high-energy water molecules from the CB7 cavity
upon binding of a hydrophobic guest. Reprinted by permission from ref. 46.
The advantage of applying CBn into molecular recognition is that the formation of CBn
based complex can be conducted in aqueous solution with high binding affinity. Generally,
compared with organic solvents the presence of water decreases the host-guest binding affinity
Page 20
Chapter 1 Introduction
8
as water molecules compete strongly to form hydrogen bond. However, this is not the case for
CBn, which are able to solve this problem by encapsulating high-energy water (Figure 1.6) in
the cavity.62 And the release of high-energy water accounts for a large proportion of the overall
hydrophobic effect for the complex formation. The number of high-energy water molecules
accommodated in the cavity is depending on CBn cavity volume. The molecular dynamics
simulations conducted by Biedermann shows that high host-guest binding affinity can be gained
by the removal of all water molecules. CB7 was found to have the highest energy gain compared
with other homologues, as it encapsulates more high energy water molecules than CB5 and
CB6 (more than twice), and has more suitable cavity size to host higher energy water molecules
than CB8.63
1.2.2 Specific Host–Guest Binding of Cucurbit[n]urils
CB5 is considered to be the smallest macrocycle in CBn family until now. In respect to its small
cavity volume (68 Å3), CB5 has been limited to use in the formation of numerous guest
molecules compared to the larger family members. Even with such small cavity and portal sizes,
CB5 and its derivative have found to be available for the formation of host-guest complex with
alkali and alkaline earth cations64 and ammonium cations64, as well as divalent transition metal
cations.55 Instead of these small cations, CB5 and derivatives are reported to encapsulate small
gas molecules, such as O2, N2, Ar, CO, N2O, CO2, He, H2, Ne, Kr, Ar, Xe, Rn and CH4.65, 66 In
particular the very recent study by the Nau group on CB5 binding affinities with noble gases
by replacement of ethane or methane as NMR probes in water is attracting attention.66 In this
study, the contributions to host–guest binding was identified and a conclusion was drawn that
the binding process is driven by differential cavitation energies rather than dispersion
interactions. Their discovery show that the cavitation energy drives the noble gas into CB5
cavity, which supplies have an impact on the improvement of gas storage materials and the
understanding of biological receptors.
CB6 is the most abundant homologue from the synthesis of CBn, with a moderate
volume of 142 Å3, which is well known to complex with aliphatic amines. Alkylammonium
and alkyldiammonium ions were firstly studied to bind with CB6 by Mock in aqueous formic
acid, with the determination of their binding constants.67 It can be well explained by the strong
interactions between the negative carbonyl rim and the positively charged protonated amines.
With further investigations Mock and coworkers found that aliphatic amines bind with CB6 has
structure selectivity.68, 69 Consequently, CB6 shows a chain length dependent selectivity with
Page 21
Chapter 1 Introduction
9
strongest binding affinities towards pentano- and hexano-bridged diammonium ions. Moreover,
the binding affinity of CB6 with imidazolium-based ions have also been studied broadly,70-72
and applied to make monofunctionalized-CB673 as well as to separate the CBn homologues.74
In addition, the small cavity of CB6 limits to include fluorescent moiety into the cavity, while
CB6 is successfully used for fluorescence sensor designs with alkyldiammonium-dye as smartly
synthesized guest to explore applications for indicator displacement assays.75-77
Compared with CB6, CB7 with the advantages of relative large cavity volume and better
water solubility, has reported to be the most popular host in CBn family.49 Compared with other
host, CB7 can recognize and host with a wider scope of guests with high binding affinities. On
account of the special properties of CB7, a couple of fluorescent dyes such as acridine orange,78
berberine chloride79 and DNA stain dye DAPI,80 are shown to form stable complex with CB7
with moderate binding constants of ca. 106, which makes CB7 favoured in many indicator
displacement strategies. What is more, CB7 is reported to bind with diamantane diammonium
with a binding constant up to 1017 M1,81 which goes over the biotin-(strept)avidin pair as the
strongest non-covalent interaction found in nature. More three dimensional compounds like
other adamantane derivatives and ferrocene also form very stable complex with CB7 (1012 -
1015 M1). The ultra-high binding of CB7-guest pair implicates that this system can be used in
some applications where biotin-(strept)avidin pair plays a role, which makes the transition from
fundamental research into practical applications.82
CB8 has a cavity volume of 367 Å3 which is 1.5 times larger than that of CB7, while
CB8 has the similar binding properties with smaller CBn homologues. CB8 also shows
relatively strong binding with adamantane and ferrocene derivatives.83 With a large cavity
volume, CB8 can also bind with large guests, for example cyclen and cyclam, to form “a
macrocycle inside macrocycle” complex.84 As well as fullerene which can bind with CB8
portals, with each portal sitting one fullerene molecule.85 Very interestingly, alkylammonium
ions armed with long aliphatic chains are reported to form U-shape within CB8 cavity.86-88
Moreover, nitroxide derivatives have also been proven to form complex with CB8.89, 90 One of
the unique properties of CB8 is the ability to encapsulate two guests, and the two guests can be
the same91 or two different molecules.92-94 This unique trait makes CB8 applicable in many
fields such as sensing,95, 96 catalysis,40, 97, 98 and supramolecular polymeric materials.99-102
Page 22
Chapter 1 Introduction
10
1.3 Functionalization of CBn and Their Applications
Acting as cyclodextrin macrocycles, the functionalization expanded their applications in
numerous varying areas, the development and prosperity of CBs family also demand
functionalization. The initial motivation to modify CBs may be ascribed to the poor solubility
of CB6 and CB8 in common solvents, which limited this host family to explore more practical
applications. The first synthesized functionalized CBs was Me10CB5 derived from
dimethylglycouril by Stoddart and co-workers in 1992.103 Since then a wide range of fully or
partially alkyl-modified CBs derivatives are reported, and the derivatives are coming from
various sources, including dimethylglycoluril,104, 105 cyclohexanoglycoluril,106, 107
diphenylglycoluril,108 and cyclopentanoglycoluril.109, 110 In 2011, Isaacs and coworkers
reported the p-xylylenediammonium ion as a template to synthesize methylene-bridged
glycoluril hexamer.111 This hexamer is available to further react with substituted
phthalaldehydes to achieve monofunctionalized CB6 derivatives (Figure 1.7). In addition, they
specially designed a “clickable” group onto the skeleton of CB6 derivative which provides a
convenient way for introducing further functionality.112 Furthermore, modified CB6 with a
fluorophore (naphthalene group) were applied by Isaacs to detect cancer-associated
nitrosamines and basic amino acids as supramolecular sensors.113, 114 This principle can also be
used to obtain CB7 derivatives by reacting the hexamer with modified glycoluril. With the
advantage of the special properties of CB7, Isaacs and co-workers used functionalized CB7 for
targeting delivery drug molecule to cancer cells,115 forming vesicle-type assemblies,116
endowing biopharmaceuticals with PEGylation,117 releasing drug molecules,118 as well as
sensing and imaging the cells.119
Page 23
Chapter 1 Introduction
11
Figure 1.7 Functionalized CB6 and CB7 derivatives from Isaacs’s group.
Generally the alkyl-modified CBs derivatives can improve the solubility of host molecules in
common solvents, but they are synthesized indirectly and difficult to be functionalized further.
Therefore, direct functionalization of CBs would be appealing. Kim and co-workers achieved
a breakthrough in this field to obtain fully-hydroxylated CBn (n = 5-8) by direct oxidation of
CBs in the presence of K2S2O8 in 2003.120 Through this method CB5 and CB6 derivatives can
be reacted very efficiently with yields of 42% and 45%, however, for CB7 and CB8, the yields
are lower than 5%. This functionalization creates a platform for further modifications and
countless potential applications, including CBs-based supramolecular polymers,121-123
fluorescent capsules,124, 125 drug delivery,126-128 enrichment of proteins,37, 129 and biocompatible
supramolecular hydrogels.130 In 2012, Scherman and co-workers separated monohydroxylated
CB6 through the oxidation of CB6 in the presence of bisimidazolium salts, and further
functionalization with reactive alkenyl and alkynyl was also reported. In 2013, Kim and co-
workers improved their previous method and separated monohydroxylated CB7 and they
successfully applied monohydroxylated CB7 to form supramolecular velcro for reversible
underwater adhesion. Two years later, Kim group conjugated a fluorophore Cy3 with CB7
(CB7-Cy3) from monohydroxylated CB7.131 The conjugation was proven to form fluorescence
resonance energy transfer (FRET) pair with adamantylamine-Cy5, and this high affinity host-
guest FRET pair was used for single vesicle content mixing assay. The ultra-high affinity
between CB7-Cy3 and adamantane or ferrocene derivatives makes this dye conjugated CB7
applicable for protein imaging in cell culture.132 Very recently, CB7 functionalized with
Page 24
Chapter 1 Introduction
12
alkenyl133 and alkynyl134 were reported by following Kim’s method, applying to form
supramolecular assembly and for drug encapsulation, respectively.
Figure 1.8 Synthesis of monohydroxylated-CBn (n = 5-8).
In 2015, Bardelang and Ouari described a photochemical method to functionalize CBn
(n = 5-8) with single alcohol in high conversions by using H2O2 and UV light (Figure 1.8).135
This method was considered to be the milestone of functionalized CBn with respect to easy
operation and excellent yields. Following this procedure, Nau and Hennig synthesized one CB7
derivative with propargyl conjugated which is clickable for further reactions. They
functionalized CB7 on the surface of macro- and nanoparticles to achieve precise control of
surface coverage densities on polymers.41 They also attached a fluorescent dye with CB7 (CB7-
CF) and a FRET pair was made between CB7-CF and DNA stain dye DAPI. The special
properties of host-guest interactions motivated them to apply this system into sensing DNA and
explore potential application in real time PCR.36
1.4 Cu (I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition
The Cu (I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3+2] cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction, often referred to as
click chemistry, was firstly reported by Tornøe and Meldal for the synthesis of solid state
peptide in 2001.136 Subsequently, the CuAAC effect was described by the groups of Meldal and
Sharpless with two independent publications in 2002.137, 138 Since then this reaction has received
considerable attention among researchers from different disciplines in the fact that the reaction
is insensitive to harsh conditions and quantitative to couple azido and ethynyl molecules
through the formation of chemical stable 1,2,3-triazole. Additionally, the triazole formed is
chemically inert to usual reactive conditions, including reduction, oxidation and hydrolysis.139
As a result, CuAAC reaction is proved to be one of the most straightforward ways to connect
Page 25
Chapter 1 Introduction
13
two molecules and has been applied in numerous research areas, including biochemistry,
materials science and medical science.140
Figure 1.9 Examples of efficient N-donor ligands for CuAAC reations. Donor atoms for copper
bonding are in red.
In principle, a CuAAC reaction only needs three components, a terminal azide, a
terminal alkyne and a Cu catalyst, and it is worth noting that any source of copper can be
accepted as a precatalyst for versatile CuAAC reaction. All other reagents (such as ligands,
solvents, and base) and reactions conditions (temperature, N2 atmosphere) are elective. Among
these, ligands (Figure 1.9) which can coordinated with Cu have been proven to accelerate the
reaction rate and protect the Cu catalyst from oxidation.140, 141 Polydentate N-donor chelators
are popular ligands used in CuAAC reactions, since the auxiliary nitrogen donors has strong
electron donating effect which make it easier for Cu to coordinate thus to be more reactive than
those with oxygen or sulfur donors.
Page 26
Chapter 1 Introduction
14
Figure 1.10 a) the mononuclear mechanism of CuAAC reaction. b) The dinuclear mechanism
of CuAAC, X is a bridging ligand.
Since CuAAC reaction is used currently in numerous fields, to understand the intrinsic
mechanism of this reaction becomes more and more urgent. Tedious work has been performed
to demonstrate the mechanism of CuAAC reaction, not only experimentally142-146 but also
theoretically.147-151 Sharpless and co-workers firstly proposed a mononuclear mechanism which
started with ethynyl copper followed by the subsequent formation of three intermediates (Figure
1.10 a). Following experiments found that the mononuclear mechanism questionable and more
than one copper ion involved in this reaction, which was further proved by density functional
theory (DFT) investigations. One remarkable experiment was conducted by Fokin and co-
workers applying isotopic labelling in CuAAC reaction, through this method bis-copper-
intermediates (binuclear) were observed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometric
technique.145 Plus the outstanding work from other groups, the dinuclear mechanism of CuAAC
reaction is increasingly accepted.143, 146, 152 In the dinuclear mechanism, the second copper was
involved to form the metallacycle structure which could alleviate the ring strain and lower the
activation barrier (Figure 1.10 b).
1.5 Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
Förster resonance energy transfer, also known as fluorescence resonance energy transfer or
resonance energy transfer, is a mechanism proposed by Theodor Förster in 1948 to describe the
energy transfer between two chromophores (referred to as a donor and an acceptor).153 FRET
is an electrodynamic happening that non-radiative energy can be transferred through long range
dipole-dipole interactions between the two chromophores in the absence of photon, therefore
this energy transfer is distance dependent. This process occurs between a donor chromophore
Page 27
Chapter 1 Introduction
15
in excited state and an acceptor in ground state. The prerequisite of FRET to occur is the
fluorescence spectrum of donor molecules overlaps with the absorbance spectrum of acceptor
molecules (Figure 1.11).
500 600
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0R-S
Flu
ore
sce
nceA
bsorb
an
ce
Wavelength (nm)
CB6-CF
Figure 1.11 Spectral overlap between the absorbance spectrum of CB6-carboxyfluorescein
(CB6-CF, donor) and the fluorescence spectrum of rhodamine-spermine (R-S, acceptor).
The theory of FRET is relatively complicated, while it is well explained by taking into account
one donor and one acceptor separated by a distance.154 With this assumption, the rate of FRET
is given by equation 1.1. QD represents the quantum yield of the donor in the absence of
acceptor. The term 2 represents the relative orientation of the donor and acceptor transition
dipoles, which is usually assumed to be 2/3. N represents Avogadro’s number. D is the donor
lifetime, n is the refractive index of the solution (typically assumed to be 1.4 for biomolecules
in aqueous solution), and r is the distance between donor and acceptor. In equation 1.1 the
transfer rate kT(r) is described as a function of r to highlight its distance dependence.
𝑘T(𝑟) = 𝑄𝐷2
D𝑟6 (9000(ln10)
1285𝑁𝑛4 ) ∫ 𝐹𝐷()𝐴()4d∞
0 (1.1)
Generally, the rate of FRET from a donor to an acceptor is given by equation 1.2. R0 is known
as Förster distance, a distance between the donor and acceptor at which the FRET efficiency is
50%. Typically, R0 is in the range of 20 to 90 Å, which are comparable to the size of biological
molecules. r is the distance between the donor and acceptor. It is obvious that the rate of FRET
is proportional to r6 with a significant dependence on the distance.
𝑘T(𝑟) =1
D(
𝑅0
𝑟)
6 (1.2)
Page 28
Chapter 1 Introduction
16
J() is the spectral overlap integral, which represents the degree of spectral overlap between
the emission spectrum of donor and the absorbance spectrum of acceptor. Where FD() is the
donor emission spectrum normalized to an area of 1, A() represents the molar extinction
coefficient of the acceptor which can be obtained from acceptor absorption spectrum. As the
name suggests, is the wavelength.
𝐽() = ∫ 𝐹𝐷()𝐴()4d∞
0 (1.3)
From equation 1.1 and 1.2, equation 1.4 can be deduced as followed. This equation expresses
that the Förster distance can be calculated from donor emission spectrum and acceptor
absorption spectrum plus the quantum yield of the donor.
𝑅06 =
9000(ln10)𝑄𝐷2
1285𝑁𝑛4 ∫ 𝐹𝐷()𝐴()4d∞
0 (1.4)
Once the value of Förster distance (R0) is known, equation 1.1 can be easily transferred to
equation 1.4. The FRET efficiency (E) is given by equation 1.5. With the substitution of
equation 1.2 into 1.5, equation 1.6 can be easily derived. From this equation, one can predict
the FRET efficiency with an estimated or calculated r value.
𝐸 =𝑘T(𝑟)
D−1+ 𝑘T(𝑟)
(1.5)
𝐸 =𝑅0
6
𝑅06+𝑟6 (1.6)
The FRET efficiency can be measured by both steady state fluorescence spectroscopy and time-
resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The calculation is given by equation 1.7, where FDA and
FD are the fluorescence intensity of the donor in the presence and absence of acceptor, DA and
D are the fluorescence lifetime of the donor in the presence and absence of acceptor.
𝐸 = 1 −𝐹DA
𝐹D= 1 −
DA
D (1.7)
With the experimental proof of FRET theory in 1967, this theory has been well explored
in countless applications, particularly in biochemistry, such as protein folding,155 medical
diagnostics, optical imaging, membrane fusion, DNA analysis and so on.
1.6 References
(1) C. J. Pedersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 7017-7036.
(2) J.-M. Lehn, Science, 1985, 227, 849-856.
Page 29
Chapter 1 Introduction
17
(3) R. C. Helgeson, J. M. Timko and D. J. Cram, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 3023-3025.
(4) E. P. Kyba, J. M. Timko, L. J. Kaplan, F. De Jong, G. W. Gokel and D. J. Cram, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 4555-4568.
(5) C. Dietrick-Buchecker, P. Marnot and J. Sauvage, Tetrahedron Lett., 1982, 23, 5291-5294.
(6) J. P. Sauvage and J. Weiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 6108-6110.
(7) J. D. Badjić, V. Balzani, A. Credi, S. Silvi and J. F. Stoddart, Science, 2004, 303, 1845-
1849.
(8) T. J. Huang, B. Brough, C.-M. Ho, Y. Liu, A. H. Flood, P. A. Bonvallet, H.-R. Tseng, J. F.
Stoddart, M. Baller and S. Magonov, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 85, 5391-5393.
(9) N. Koumura, R. W. Zijlstra, R. A. van Delden, N. Harada and B. L. Feringa, Nature, 1999,
401, 152-155.
(10) J. Vachon, G. T. Carroll, M. M. Pollard, E. M. Mes, A. M. Brouwer and B. L. Feringa,
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2014, 13, 241-246.
(11) R. Eelkema, M. M. Pollard, J. Vicario, N. Katsonis, B. S. Ramon, C. W. Bastiaansen, D.
J. Broer and B. L. Feringa, Nature, 2006, 440, 163.
(12) R. Behrend, E. Meyer and F. Rusche, Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1905, 339, 1-
37.
(13) W. Freeman, W. Mock and N. Shih, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 7367-7368.
(14) J. Kim, I.-S. Jung, S.-Y. Kim, E. Lee, J.-K. Kang, S. Sakamoto, K. Yamaguchi and K.
Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 540-541.
(15) J. W. Lee, S. Samal, N. Selvapalam, H.-J. Kim and K. Kim, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36,
621-630.
(16) A. Day, A. P. Arnold, R. J. Blanch and B. Snushall, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 8094-8100.
(17) A. I. Day, R. J. Blanch, A. P. Arnold, S. Lorenzo, G. R. Lewis and I. Dance, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed., 2002, 114, 285-287.
(18) S. Liu, P. Y. Zavalij and L. Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 16798-16799.
(19) J. Lagona, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakrabarti and L. Isaacs, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005,
44, 4844-4870.
(20) L. Isaacs, Isr. J. Chem., 2011, 51, 578-591.
(21) X. J. Cheng, L. L. Liang, K. Chen, N. N. Ji, X. Xiao, J. X. Zhang, Y. Q. Zhang, S. F. Xue,
Q. J. Zhu and X. L. Ni, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 125, 7393-7396.
(22) Q. Li, S.-C. Qiu, J. Zhang, K. Chen, Y. Huang, X. Xiao, Y. Zhang, F. Li, Y.-Q. Zhang and
S.-F. Xue, Org. Lett., 2016, 18, 4020-4023.
Page 30
Chapter 1 Introduction
18
(23) E. A. Appel, F. Biedermann, U. Rauwald, S. T. Jones, J. M. Zayed and O. A. Scherman,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14251-14260.
(24) J. Liu, C. S. Y. Tan, Z. Yu, N. Li, C. Abell and O. A. Scherman, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29,
1065325.
(25) J. Liu, C. S. Y. Tan, Z. Yu, Y. Lan, C. Abell and O. A. Scherman, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29,
1604951.
(26) A. Hennig, H. Bakirci and W. M. Nau, Nat. Methods, 2007, 4, 629.
(27) D. M. Bailey, A. Hennig, V. D. Uzunova and W. M. Nau, Chem. Eur. J., 2008, 14, 6069-
6077.
(28) G. Ghale, V. Ramalingam, A. R. Urbach and W. M. Nau, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133,
7528-7535.
(29) M. Nilam, P. Gribbon, J. Reinshagen, K. Cordts, E. Schwedhelm, W. M. Nau and A.
Hennig, SLAS Discov., 2017, 22, 906-914.
(30) C. Hang, Z. Fang-fang, Z. Jian-xin, Z. Xi, T. Zhu, X. Sai-feng and Z. Qian-jiang, Catal.
Commun., 2009, 11, 167-170.
(31) A. L. Koner, C. Márquez, M. H. Dickman and W. M. Nau, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011,
50, 545-548.
(32) G. Parvari, O. Reany and E. Keinan, Isr. J. Chem., 2011, 51, 646-663.
(33) A. R. Urbach and V. Ramalingam, Isr. J. Chem., 2011, 51, 664-678.
(34) K. Kim, N. Selvapalam, Y. H. Ko, K. M. Park, D. Kim and J. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007,
36, 267-279.
(35) A. I. Lazar, F. Biedermann, K. R. Mustafina, K. I. Assaf, A. Hennig and W. M. Nau, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 13022-13029.
(36) S. Zhang, K. I. Assaf, C. Huang, A. Hennig and W. M. Nau, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55,
671-674.
(37) D.-W. Lee, K. M. Park, M. Banerjee, S. H. Ha, T. Lee, K. Suh, S. Paul, H. Jung, J. Kim
and N. Selvapalam, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3, 154-159.
(38) A. Hennig, A. Hoffmann, H. Borcherding, T. Thiele, U. Schedler and U. Resch-Genger,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7842-7844.
(39) H. Chen, Z. Huang, H. Wu, J. F. Xu and X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 129,
16802-16805.
(40) X. Tang, Z. Huang, H. Chen, Y. Kang, J.-F. Xu and X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2018, 57, 8545-8549.
Page 31
Chapter 1 Introduction
19
(41) S. Zhang, Z. Domínguez, K. I. Assaf, M. Nilam, T. Thiele, U. Pischel, U. Schedler, W. M.
Nau and A. Hennig, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 8575-8581.
(42) H.-J. Buschmann, E. Cleve, K. Jansen, A. Wego and E. Schollmeyer, Mater. Sci. Eng. C,
2001, 14, 35-39.
(43) P. Germain, J. Letoffe, M. Merlin and H. Buschmann, Thermochim. Acta, 1998, 315, 87-
92.
(44) S. Mecozzi and J. Rebek, Julius, Chemistry–A European Journal, 1998, 4, 1016-1022.
(45) W. M. Nau, M. Florea and K. I. Assaf, Isr. J. Chem., 2011, 51, 559-577.
(46) K. I. Assaf and W. M. Nau, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 394-418.
(47) B. Honig and A. Nicholls, Science, 1995, 268, 1144-1149.
(48) J. D. Crowley, A. J. Goshe and B. Bosnich, Chem. Commun., 2003, 0, 392-393.
(49) S. J. Barrow, S. Kasera, M. J. Rowland, J. del Barrio and O. A. Scherman, Chem. Rev.,
2015, 115, 12320-12406.
(50) Y.-M. Jeon, J. Kim, D. Whang and K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 9790-9791.
(51) D. Whang, J. Heo, J. H. Park and K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 78-80.
(52) O. Gerasko, A. Virovets, D. Samsonenko, A. Tripol, V. Fedin and D. Fenske, Russ. Chem.
Bull., 2003, 52, 585-593.
(53) O. Danylyuk and V. P. Fedin, Cryst. Growth Des., 2011, 12, 550-555.
(54) J.-X. Liu, L.-S. Long, R.-B. Huang and L.-S. Zheng, Cryst. Growth Des., 2006, 6, 2611-
2614.
(55) H.-J. Buschmann, E. Cleve, K. Jansen and E. Schollmeyer, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2001, 437,
157-163.
(56) O. A. Gerasko, E. A. Mainicheva, M. I. Naumova, M. Neumaier, M. M. Kappes, S.
Lebedkin, D. Fenske and V. P. Fedin, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 8869-8880.
(57) P. Thuéry, Cryst. Growth Des., 2009, 9, 1208-1215.
(58) J.-X. Liu, L.-S. Long, R.-B. Huang and L.-S. Zheng, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 10168-10173.
(59) D. G. Samsonenko, J. Lipkowski, O. A. Gerasko, A. V. Virovets, M. N. Sokolov, V. P.
Fedin, J. G. Platas, R. Hernandez‐Molina and A. Mederos, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2002, 2002,
2380-2388.
(60) K. Jansen, H.-J. Buschmann, A. Wego, D. Döpp, C. Mayer, H.-J. Drexler, H.-J. Holdt and
E. Schollmeyer, J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem., 2001, 39, 357-363.
(61) F. Biedermann and O. A. Scherman, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2012, 116, 2842-2849.
(62) F. Biedermann, W. M. Nau and H. J. Schneider, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 11158-
11171.
Page 32
Chapter 1 Introduction
20
(63) F. Biedermann, V. D. Uzunova, O. A. Scherman, W. M. Nau and A. De Simone, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 15318-15323.
(64) H.-J. Buschmann, E. Cleve, K. Jansen, A. Wego and E. Schollmeyer, J. Incl. Phenom.
Macrocycl. Chem., 2001, 40, 117-120.
(65) K. A. Kellersberger, J. D. Anderson, S. M. Ward, K. E. Krakowiak and D. V. Dearden, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 11316-11317.
(66) S. He, F. Biedermann, N. Vankova, L. Zhechkov, T. Heine, R. E. Hoffman, A. De Simone,
T. T. Duignan and W. M. Nau, Nat. Chem., 2018, 10, 1252-1257.
(67) W. Mock and N. Shih, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 3618-3619.
(68) W. L. Mock and N. Y. Shih, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 4440-4446.
(69) W. L. Mock and N. Y. Shih, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 4706-4710.
(70) L. Liu, N. Zhao and O. A. Scherman, Chem. Commun., 2008, 0, 1070-1072.
(71) N. Zhao, L. Liu, F. Biedermann and O. A. Scherman, Chem. Asian J., 2010, 5, 530-537.
(72) V. Kolman, R. Marek, Z. Strelcova, P. Kulhanek, M. Necas, J. Svec and V. Sindelar, Chem.
Eur. J., 2009, 15, 6926-6931.
(73) N. Zhao, G. O. Lloyd and O. A. Scherman, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3070-3072.
(74) D. Jiao and O. A. Scherman, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 2445-2449.
(75) A. Praetorius, D. M. Bailey, T. Schwarzlose and W. M. Nau, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 4089-
4092.
(76) M. Florea and W. M. Nau, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 123, 9510-9514.
(77) C. P. Carvalho, R. Ferreira, J. P. Da Silva and U. Pischel, Supramol. Chem., 2013, 25, 92-
100.
(78) M. Shaikh, J. Mohanty, P. K. Singh, W. M. Nau and H. Pal, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.,
2008, 7, 408-414.
(79) M. Megyesi, L. Biczók and I. Jablonkai, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 3410-3416.
(80) Z. Miskolczy, L. Biczók, M. Megyesi and I. Jablonkai, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113, 1645-
1651.
(81) L. Cao, M. Šekutor, P. Y. Zavalij, K. Mlinarić‐Majerski, R. Glaser and L. Isaacs, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 126, 1006-1011.
(82) D. Shetty, J. K. Khedkar, K. M. Park and K. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 8747-8761.
(83) S. Liu, C. Ruspic, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakrabarti, P. Y. Zavalij and L. Isaacs, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 15959-15967.
(84) A. Ol'ga, D. G. Samsonenko and V. P. Fedin, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2002, 71, 741-760.
(85) G. Jiang and G. Li, J. Photochem. Photobiol., 2006, 85, 223-227.
Page 33
Chapter 1 Introduction
21
(86) Y. H. Ko, H. Kim, Y. Kim and K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 120, 4174-4177.
(87) Y. H. Ko, Y. Kim, H. Kim and K. Kim, Chem. Asian J., 2011, 6, 652-657.
(88) Y. Jiao, J.-F. Xu, Z. Wang and X. Zhang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 22635-
22640.
(89) E. Mileo, E. Mezzina, F. Grepioni, G. F. Pedulli and M. Lucarini, Chem. Eur. J., 2009, 15,
7859-7862.
(90) D. Bardelang, K. Banaszak, H. Karoui, A. Rockenbauer, M. Waite, K. Udachin, J. A.
Ripmeester, C. I. Ratcliffe, O. Ouari and P. Tordo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 5402-5404.
(91) Y. Kang, X. Tang, H. Yu, Z. Cai, Z. Huang, D. Wang, J.-F. Xu and X. Zhang, Chem. Sci.,
2017, 8, 8357-8361.
(92) H. J. Kim, J. Heo, W. S. Jeon, E. Lee, J. Kim, S. Sakamoto, K. Yamaguchi and K. Kim,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 1526-1529.
(93) M. E. Bush, N. D. Bouley and A. R. Urbach, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 14511-14517.
(94) Y. Ling, W. Wang and A. E. Kaifer, Chem. Commun., 2007, 0, 610-612.
(95) R. W. Taylor, R. J. Coulston, F. Biedermann, S. Mahajan, J. J. Baumberg and O. A.
Scherman, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 5985-5990.
(96) M. L. Roldán, S. Sanchez-Cortes, J. V. García-Ramos and C. Domingo, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 4935-4941.
(97) C. Yang, T. Mori, Y. Origane, Y. H. Ko, N. Selvapalam, K. Kim and Y. Inoue, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 8574-8575.
(98) S. P. Gromov, A. I. Vedernikov, L. G. Kuz'mina, D. V. Kondratuk, S. K. Sazonov, Y. A.
Strelenko, M. V. Alfimov and J. A. Howard, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 2010, 2587-2599.
(99) X. Yang, H. Yu, L. Wang, R. Tong, M. Akram, Y. Chen and X. Zhai, Soft Matter, 2015,
11, 1242-1252.
(100) S. Gürbüz, M. Idris and D. Tuncel, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2015, 13, 330-347.
(101) C. S. Y. Tan, J. Liu, A. S. Groombridge, S. J. Barrow, C. A. Dreiss and O. A. Scherman,
Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1702994.
(102) W. Xu, Q. Song, J.-F. Xu, M. J. Serpe and X. Zhang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017,
9, 11368-11372.
(103) A. Flinn, G. C. Hough, J. F. Stoddart and D. J. Williams, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1992,
31, 1475-1477.
(104) A. I. Day, A. P. Arnold and R. J. Blanch, Molecules, 2003, 8, 74-84.
(105) B. Vinciguerra, L. Cao, J. R. Cannon, P. Y. Zavalij, C. Fenselau and L. Isaacs, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 13133-13140.
Page 34
Chapter 1 Introduction
22
(106) J. Zhao, H. J. Kim, J. Oh, S. Y. Kim, J. W. Lee, S. Sakamoto, K. Yamaguchi and K. Kim,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 113, 4363-4365.
(107) Z.-F. Li, L.-L. Liang, F. Wu, F.-G. Zhou, X.-L. Ni, X. Feng, X. Xiao, Y.-Q. Zhang, S.-F.
Xue and Q.-J. Zhu, CrystEngComm, 2013, 15, 1994-2001.
(108) H. Isobe, S. Sato and E. Nakamura, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1287-1289.
(109) F. Wu, L.-H. Wu, X. Xiao, Y.-Q. Zhang, S.-F. Xue, Z. Tao and A. I. Day, J. Org. Chem.,
2011, 77, 606-611.
(110) L.-H. Wu, X.-L. Ni, F. Wu, Y.-Q. Zhang, Q.-J. Zhu, S.-F. Xue and Z. Tao, J. Mol. Struct.,
2009, 920, 183-188.
(111) D. Lucas, T. Minami, G. Iannuzzi, L. Cao, J. B. Wittenberg, P. Anzenbacher Jr and L.
Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 17966-17976.
(112) L. Cao and L. Isaacs, Organic letters, 2012, 14, 3072-3075.
(113) T. Minami, N. A. Esipenko, B. Zhang, M. E. Kozelkova, L. Isaacs, R. Nishiyabu, Y.
Kubo and P. Anzenbacher Jr, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 20021-20024.
(114) T. Minami, N. A. Esipenko, B. Zhang, L. Isaacs and P. Anzenbacher, Chem. Commun.,
2013, 50, 61-63.
(115) L. Cao, G. Hettiarachchi, V. Briken and L. Isaacs, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52,
12033-12037.
(116) Y. Yu, J. Li, M. Zhang, L. Cao and L. Isaacs, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 3762-3765.
(117) M. J. Webber, E. A. Appel, B. Vinciguerra, A. B. Cortinas, L. S. Thapa, S. Jhunjhunwala,
L. Isaacs, R. Langer and D. G. Anderson, Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. , 2016, 113, 14189-14194.
(118) S. K. Samanta, J. Quigley, B. Vinciguerra, V. Briken and L. Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2017, 139, 9066-9074.
(119) A. T. Bockus, L. C. Smith, A. G. Grice, O. A. Ali, C. C. Young, W. Mobley, A. Leek, J.
L. Roberts, B. Vinciguerra and L. Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 16549-16552.
(120) S. Y. Jon, N. Selvapalam, D. H. Oh, J.-K. Kang, S.-Y. Kim, Y. J. Jeon, J. W. Lee and K.
Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 10186-10187.
(121) M. Munteanu, S. Choi and H. Ritter, Macromolecules, 2009, 42, 3887-3891.
(122) D. Kim, E. Kim, J. Lee, S. Hong, W. Sung, N. Lim, C. G. Park and K. Kim, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 9908-9919.
(123) K. Baek, G. Yun, Y. Kim, D. Kim, R. Hota, I. Hwang, D. Xu, Y. H. Ko, G. H. Gu and J.
H. Suh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 6523-6528.
(124) E. Kim, J. Lee, D. Kim, K. E. Lee, S. S. Han, N. Lim, J. Kang, C. G. Park and K. Kim,
Chem. Commun., 2009, 0, 1472-1474.
Page 35
Chapter 1 Introduction
23
(125) M. Li, M. B. Zaman, D. Bardelang, X. Wu, D. Wang, J. C. Margeson, D. M. Leek, J. A.
Ripmeester, C. I. Ratcliffe and Q. Lin, Chem. Commun., 2009, 0, 6807-6809.
(126) H.-K. Lee, K. M. Park, Y. J. Jeon, D. Kim, D. H. Oh, H. S. Kim, C. K. Park and K. Kim,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 5006-5007.
(127) K. M. Park, K. Suh, H. Jung, D.-W. Lee, Y. Ahn, J. Kim, K. Baek and K. Kim, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 0, 71-73.
(128) K. Lei, C. Wang, L. Liu, Y. Luo, C. Mu, F. Li and J. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018,
130, 4777-4781.
(129) J. Murray, J. Sim, K. Oh, G. Sung, A. Lee, A. Shrinidhi, A. Thirunarayanan, D. Shetty
and K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 129, 2435-2438.
(130) K. M. Park, J.-A. Yang, H. Jung, J. Yeom, J. S. Park, K.-H. Park, A. S. Hoffman, S. K.
Hahn and K. Kim, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 2960-2968.
(131) B. Gong, B.-K. Choi, J.-Y. Kim, D. Shetty, Y. H. Ko, N. Selvapalam, N. K. Lee and K.
Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 8908-8911.
(132) K. L. Kim, G. Sung, J. Sim, J. Murray, M. Li, A. Lee, A. Shrinidhi, K. M. Park and K.
Kim, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 1712.
(133) C. Sun, H. Zhang, S. Li, X. Zhang, Q. Cheng, Y. Ding, L.-H. Wang and R. Wang, ACS
Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 25090-25098.
(134) A. Koc, R. Khan and D. Tuncel, Chem. Eur. J., 2018, 24, 15550-15555.
(135) M. M. Ayhan, H. Karoui, M. Hardy, A. Rockenbauer, L. Charles, R. Rosas, K. Udachin,
P. Tordo, D. Bardelang and O. Ouari, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 10238-10245.
(136) C. Tornøe and M. Meldal, American Peptide Society and Kluwer Academic Publishers:
San Diego, CA, 2001, 263.
(137) C. W. Tornøe, C. Christensen and M. Meldal, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 3057-3064.
(138) V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2002, 114, 2708-2711.
(139) M. Meldal and C. W. Tornøe, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2952-3015.
(140) E. Haldon, M. C. Nicasio and P. J. Perez, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2015, 13, 9528-9550.
(141) V. Bevilacqua, M. King, M. Chaumontet, M. Nothisen, S. Gabillet, D. Buisson, C. Puente,
A. Wagner and F. Taran, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 126, 5982-5986.
(142) W. G. Lewis, F. G. Magallon, V. V. Fokin and M. Finn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
9152-9153.
(143) C. Nolte, P. Mayer and B. F. Straub, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 2101-2103.
(144) B. R. Buckley, S. E. Dann and H. Heaney, Chem. Eur. J., 2010, 16, 6278-6284.
Page 36
Chapter 1 Introduction
24
(145) B. Worrell, J. Malik and V. V. Fokin, Science, 2013, 340, 457-460.
(146) C. Iacobucci, S. Reale, J. F. Gal and F. De Angelis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54,
3065-3068.
(147) F. Himo, T. Lovell, R. Hilgraf, V. V. Rostovtsev, L. Noodleman, K. B. Sharpless and V.
V. Fokin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 210-216.
(148) M. Ahlquist and V. V. Fokin, Organometallics, 2007, 26, 4389-4391.
(149) D. Cantillo, M. Ávalos, R. Babiano, P. Cintas, J. L. Jiménez and J. C. Palacios, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 2952-2958.
(150) C. Wang, D. Ikhlef, S. Kahlal, J.-Y. Saillard and D. Astruc, Coordin. Chem. Rev., 2016,
316, 1-20.
(151) Y. Ozkılıc and N. S. Tuzun, Organometallics, 2016, 35, 2589-2599.
(152) L. Jin, D. R. Tolentino, M. Melaimi and G. Bertrand, Sci. Adv., 2015, 1, e1500304.
(153) T. Förster, Annalen der Physik, 1948, 437, 55-75.
(154) L. Stryer and R. P. Haugland, Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci., 1967, 58, 719-726.
(155) B. Schuler, A. Soranno, H. Hofmann and D. Nettels, Annu. Rev. Biophys., 2016, 45, 207-
231.
Page 37
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
25
Chapter 2. Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized
CB6 and CB7
Page 38
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
26
Page 39
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
27
In the past decade, the supramolecular chemistry of the CBn family of molecular containers has
rapidly developed due to the exceptionally high affinity and selectivity in aqueous solution.1-7
Accordingly, unfunctionalized CBn have been used to create functional supramolecular
systems including molecular machines, materials for capture and release of volatile compounds,
supramolecular polymers, solubilizing agents for insoluble drugs, supramolecular catalysts, and
chemical sensing ensembles. In order to further extend the supramolecular chemistry of CBn it
is necessary to develop efficient synthetic methods to prepare functionalized CBn derivatives.
2.1 Introduction
A big step in this direction is accomplished by Kim group who performed the direct
perhydroxylation of cucurbituril using K2S2O8 as an oxidant to yield a series of hydroxy-
substituted (OH)2nCBn,8 which has served as a trigger for the synthesis of many other
functionalized cucurbituril.9-14 These reactions represent the first direct covalent derivatizations
of CBn. These functionalized products show various potential applications, including the
synthesis of chromatographic materials,15 formation of ion channels, construction of sensors as
well as their utility in ion separation and capture applications.16 They also show promise in
molecular devices,17 as antibacterial agents that are stable against enzymatic degradation,18 as
functional CBn-based polymers,19-23 and for the formation of CBn-based supramolecular
polymers.24 Further areas include application in drug delivery,25, 26 as fluorescent capsules,27
and as supramolecular biocompatible hydrogels.28
Scherman and coworkers isolated monohydroxylated CB6 by harnessing the host-guest
chemistry of bisimidazolium salts with CB6 with a much high solubility.9 Afterwards, Kim
group improved their method and obtained monohydroxylated CB7 in one step with a weak
point of low quantitative reaction conversion.29 Recently, Bardelang and Ouari developed a
convenient photochemical method to synthesize monohydroxylated CBn directly with
relatively high yield by using hydrogen peroxide and UV light,30 and what we are following is
this direct synthesis method.
Page 40
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
28
2.2 Synthesis and Separation of CBn
Figure 2.1 The reaction between glycoluril and formaldehyde.
60 mL 9 M sulfuric acid is mixed with 20 mL formaldehyde (37% aqueous solution) at room
temperature and then cooled down the temperature to 2-5 C using an ice bath. Then glycoluril
is then added in small portions with vigorous stirring. The temperature is increased to 95 C in
an oil bath and the mixture is refluxed for 72 h.
200 mL distilled water and 800 mL acetone are added into the reaction solution with
vigorous stirring, in order to participate all CBn homologues. The suspension is settled down,
filtered and washed with 250 mL mixed solution of acetone and water (v/v: 4:1). The filtrate is
collected and decanted subsequently with small portion of acetone/water solution in order to
remove the concentrated acid. The precipitate is dissolved in 400 mL distilled water. CB5 and
CB7 would dissolve but not CB6 and CB8 whose solubilities in water are very low. By this
step, the mixture of CB6 and CB8 is the solid in the filter and mixture of CB5 and CB7 is in
the filtrate.
To get CB6, 10 g of the mixture of CB6 and CB8 (dry solid) is dissolved in 100 mL 3 M
HCl. Then the solution is filtrated, CB6 stays in the solution and little CB6 and CB8 are left in
the filter. The solution is evaporated to get the solid, 200 mL methanol is added to disperse the
solid again, and then the solution is filtrated following by 3 times water (3 50 mL) washing
and 3 times methanol (3 30 mL) washing.
To get CB7, a volume of 300 mL acetone is added to the filtrate, which would precipitate
mainly the CB7. Then the solid is washed a couple of times with acetone and dried under
vacuum, relatively pure CB7 can be obtained.
Page 41
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
29
2.3 Synthesis of CB6-OH and CB7-OH
Figure 2.2 Synthesis of CB6-OH and CB7-OH.
Take CB7 as an example, CB6 follows the same procedure. 1 g (0.86 mmol) CB7 was dissolved
in 125 mL of a mixture of Millipore water and 12 M HCl (3:2 v/v) and introduced in a 250 mL
quartz glass round bottom flask under nitrogen. 65 µL (0.62 mmol) 30% hydrogen peroxide in
H2O was added and the solution was vigorously stirred during irradiation of UV light (254 nm)
for 48 h. The reaction was monitored by 1H NMR by taking aliquots of the reaction mixture.
The solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure affording a white solid. The
crude product containing a mixture of CB7-(OH)n (with n = 0, 1, 2, 3)30 was separated by
column chromatography. Therefore, the mixture was dissolved in 950 µL H2O/HCOOH 1:1
and loaded onto silica gel 60 (0.04-0.063 mm) and the column was eluted with
H2O/AcOH/HCOOH 10:10:1.5. The eluent was collected in fractions of 2 mL (>250 fractions)
and the fractions containing pure CB7-OH were combined. Evaporation of the solvent gave 150
mg CB7-OH as a white solid. The 1H NMR was in accordance with the reported spectrum30 and
the identity and purity of the obtained material was additionally confirmed by mass
spectrometry (Figure 2.3 and 2.4). The ESI-MS spectra were obtained in the presence of
cystamine, as cystamine can dramatically increase the water solubility of CBn.
Page 42
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
30
Figure 2.3 Mass spectrum of CB7-OH with 1 mM cystamine in Millipore water. Traces of CB6
were presumably enriched during column chromatography.
Figure 2.4 Mass spectrum of CB6-OH with 1 mM cystamine in Millipore water.
Page 43
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
31
2.4 Synthesis of CB6-OPr and CB7-OPr
Figure 2.5 Synthesis of CB6-OPr and CB7-OPr.
Take CB7-OPr for example. 20 mg (17 µmol) CB7-OH was dissolved in 1.5 mL anhydrous
DMSO. 10 mg (0.4 mmol) NaH (95% purity as solid) was added, and the mixture was stirred
at room temperature for 3 h. Subsequently, the mixture was cooled to 0 °C, 0.5 mL (4.4 mmol)
propargyl bromide was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12
h. 50 mL diethyl ether was added, and the resulting precipitate was three times triturated with
25 mL MeOH. Drying under high vacuum afforded a pale yellow solid, which was subjected a
second time to the same reaction conditions. This gave the desired CB7-OPr quantitatively as
confirmed by mass spectrometry (Figure 2.7), 1H NMR (Figure 2.8), MS (ESI, +ve): 685.3,
[CB7-OPr+Cys+2H]2+.
Noteworthy, the functionalization of propargyl group with CB6 and CB7 need to be
reacted twice to achieve a high yield. This process can be well followed by MS spectra. As can
be seen from Figure 2.6 and 2.7, after one time reaction free mono-hydroxylated CB6 and CB7
is still left in a large amount. However, with one more time reaction under the same conditions,
nearly 100% yield is obtained finally. In addition, this functionalization lowers the solubility of
CB6-OH and CB7-OH. Consequently, for both CB6-OPr and CB7-OPr, NMR spectra can only
be shown in the presence of guest molecules, such as p-xylylenediamine with CB7-OPr.
Page 44
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
32
Figure 2.6 Mass spectra of product started with CB6-OH with 1 mM cystamine in Millipore
water.
Page 45
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
33
Figure 2.7 Mass spectrum of product started with CB6-OH with 1 mM cystamine in
Millipore water.
Page 46
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
34
Figure 2.8 1H NMR spectra of CB7-OPr in 1% DCl in D2O in absence (top) and presence of
substoichiometric amounts (middle) or excess (bottom) of the cavity binder p-xylylenediamine.
2.5 Synthesis of CB6-Carboxyfluorescein (CB6-CF)
Figure 2.9 Synthesis of CB6-CF.
Page 47
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
35
21 mg (20 μmol) CB6-OPr was dissolved in DMSO/H2O (3.4 mL/0.9 mL, 4.3 mL in total).
Subsequently, 6-Caboxyfluorescein-Azide (40 μmol), CuSO4 (40 μmol), sodium ascorbate
(40 μmol) and TBTA (20 μmol) were added. The solution is stirred at room temperature for
24 h. 50 mL diethyl ether was added, and the resulting precipitate was washed three times with
25 mL MeOH. Drying under high vacuum afforded a dark solid. The crude product containing
unreacted CB6-OPr, 6-FAM-Azide, and CB6-CF, was purified by column chromatography. In
detail, the mixture was dissolved in 600 μL H2O/HCOOH 1:1 and loaded onto silica gel 60
(0.04-0.063 mm) and the column was eluted with H2O/AcOH/HCOOH 10:10:1.5. The eluent
was collected in fractions of 2 mL (ca. 50 fractions) and the fractions containing pure CB6-CF
were combined. Evaporation of the solvent gave 8 mg (7.6 μmol, 38% yield) CB6-CF as a
brown solid. The product identity was confirmed by mass spectrometry (Figure 2.10), [CB6-
CF+Cys+2H+]2+ is calculated at 832 and found at 832.
Figure 2.10 The mass spectrum of CB6-CF.
2.6 Designed FRET Pair Based on CB6-CF and R-S
Our initial aim is to design a FRET pair based on host-guest interactions and try to explore its
potential applications. Therefore, after the successful synthesis of CB6-CF, we designed a guest
molecule rhodamine-spermine (R-S) which was afforded by Prof. Pischel (structures are shown
in Figure 2.11 a, b). Figure 2.11 c illustrates a FRET pair based on supramolecular host-guest
interaction between CB6-CF and R-S. In this FRET pair, CB6-CF and R-S are considered as
the donor and the acceptor respectively. As a result of the simulated calculation based on the
complex of CB6-CF and R-S (as shown in Figure 2.12), the maximum distance between
acceptor and donor depends on the molecules orientation, which is calculated to be 0.9 nm and
1.4 nm in two possible structures. This calculation demonstrates the designed FRET system
possible to occur theoretically.
Page 48
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
36
Figure 2.11 Illustration of host-guest FRET pair based on CB6-CF and R-S.
Figure 2.12 DFT calculation of the structure in different possible orientations for the CB6-
CF/R-S complex in gas phase.
Page 49
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
37
2.6.1 Spectral Characterization of the Designed FRET pair
300 400 500 600 700 800
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0R-S
Flu
ore
sce
nceA
bsorb
an
ce
Wavelength (nm)
CB6-CF
Figure 2.13 Normalized absorption (dashed) and emission (solid) spectra of CB6-CF (black)
and R-S (green) in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.5. exc,CB6-CF = 490 nm and exc,R-S = 560 nm.
Figure 2.13 shows the spectroscopic properties of CB6-CF and R-S. The spectral overlap
between the CB6-CF emission spectrum (black solid line in Figure 2.13) and the R-S absorption
spectrum (green dashed line) demonstrates this FRET pair works in principle. The results from
control experiments show that CB6-CF could be selectively excited around 450 nm, where the
absorbance of R-S is insignificant.
2.6.2 Spectral Properties of the Designed FRET Pair
Steady state fluorescence spectroscopy is used to characterize the spectral properties of this
FRET pair. Titrations of 50 nM CB6-CF with increasing amounts of R-S were carried out to
investigate the performance of the FRET system (Figure 2.14 a, b). Overall, the spectral changes
during the titrations can be grouped into three different concentration regions of R-S. At low
concentrations of R-S (0-0.12 µM), the fluorescence of CB6-CF steeply decreases by a factor
of two and R-S is not fluorescent at all (Figure 2.14 a). We presume that this is due to formation
of the host-guest complex leading to fluorescence quenching of the fluorescein dye due to the
close spatial proximity of the rhodamine dye. In fact, analysis of the fitting curve of this
concentration region suggested a nearly quantitative binding affording a lower limit of the
binding constant of Ka > 6 × 108 M1. This is accordance with the very strong binding reported
for spermine to CB6 (Ka ca. 1012 M1). With increasing concentrations of R-S (0.36-0.76 µM),
the fluorescence intensity of CB6-CF starts to slightly increase. We believe that this is due to a
residual fluorescence emission from excess R-S. The solution now contains ca. 10 times more
Page 50
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
38
R-S than CB6-CF. This is supported by Figure 2.14 d (only R-S), where a slight increase in
fluorescence around 521 nm becomes visible in this concentration range.
500 550 600 650 700
0
2
4
6
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
a) CB6-CF and R-S (0-0.12 µM)
CR-S
0
0,0049
0,0149
0,0348
0,0744
0,1234
500 550 600 650 700
0
2
4
6
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
b) CB6-CF and R-S (0.12-4.36 µM)
CR-S
0,1234
0,2200
0,3614
0,5437
0,7621
1,0112
1,2854
1,5789
1,8864
2,2027
2,5233
2,8443
3,2249
3,4747
3,7791
4,0740
4,3582
500 550 600 650 700
0
2
4
6
8
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
c)CR-S
0
0,0049
0,0149
0,0348
0,0744
0,1234
0,2200
0,3614
0,5437
0,7621
1,0112
1,2854
1,5789
1,8864
2,2027
2,5233
2,8443
3,2249
3,4747
3,7791
4,0740
4,3582
6-FAM-Azide and R-S (0-4.36 µM)
500 550 600 650 700
0.0
2.5
5.0F
luore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
d)CR-S
0
0,0049
0,0149
0,0348
0,0744
0,1234
0,2200
0,3614
0,5437
0,7621
1,0112
1,2854
1,5789
1,8864
2,2027
2,5233
2,8443
3,2249
3,4747
3,7791
4,0740
4,3582
only R-S (0-4.36 µM)
Figure 2.14 Fluorescence titrations (exc = 450 nm, slits: 10/10) and control experiments with
increasing amounts of R-S (0 to 4.36 µM) in presence of a) 50 nM CB6-CF and 0-0.12 µM R-
S, b) 50 nM CB6-CF and 0.12-4.36 µM R-S, c) 50 nM 6-FAM azide, and d) in absence of
fluorescein. Experiments were performed in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.5.
Addition of even larger amounts of R-S (>0.76 µM, >15fold excess) then leads to a
continuous decrease in the fluorescence intensity of fluorescein. At these high concentrations,
R-S shows significant absorbance in the spectral region of fluorescein emission ( =
110000 M1cm1, A > 0.08). This may lead to reabsorption of the emitted photons and thus a
decrease in fluorescence. This is supported by a similar decrease in fluorescence upon addition
of R-S to a solution containing 6-FAM-azide lacking the CB6 receptor (Figures 2.14 c).
In summary, it becomes apparent that a host-guest complex between CB6-CF and R-S
is formed. The spectral changes of the titration and the control experiments are in clear
accordance with this interpretation. However, a fluorescence increase in the R-S emission at
low concentrations of R-S (Figure 2.14 a) was not observed, which currently suggests that
FRET is not the quenching mechanism.
Page 51
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
39
2.6.3 Quenching Mechanism
As noted above, the absence of a fluorescence increase in the region of rhodamine emission
during the titration of CB6-CF with R-S suggests that FRET is not the (only) operative
fluorescence quenching mechanism. We thus considered that static quenching, either of
fluorescein by rhodamine or of rhodamine by fluorescein after FRET, may cause the lack of
fluorescence increase.
600 650 700
0
5000
10000
a)
Inte
nsity
Wavelength (nm)
0
0,0015
0,0047
0,0111
0,0426
0,0886
0,1333
0,2601
0,4137
0,5845
0,7637
0,9361
1,0856
1,2167
1,3324
CCB6-CF110 nM R-S
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2
8500
9000
9500
10000b)
Inte
nsity
[CB6-CF] (M)
Figure 2.15 a) Titration of R-S (110 nM) with CB6-CF (From 0 to 1.33 µM) in 10 mM
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.5 using direct excitation of R-S (λex= 550 nm). b) CB6-CF concentration
dependence of the fluorescence intensity of R-S at 580 nm.
600 650 700
0
1500
3000
4500
a)
Inte
nsity
Wavelength (nm)
0 10 20 30
4250
4500
4750
5000b)
Inte
nsity
[CB6] ()
Figure 2.16 a) Titration of 0.5 µM R-S with CB6 (0 to 30 µM) in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.5.
(λexc = 560 nm). b) CB6 concentration dependence of the fluorescence intensity of R-S at 580
nm.
To test whether there is static quenching of rhodamine by fluorescein (after FRET) in
this system or not, a control titration experiment was conducted. We used a constant
concentration of R-S and added increasing amounts of CB6-CF (Figure 2.15). The excitation
wavelength was 550 nm, such that rhodamine is directly excited without exciting CB6-CF.
Page 52
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
40
Under these conditions, any change in rhodamine fluorescence must occur because of the
formed complex. In fact, we observed a slight decrease of R-S fluorescence intensity, which
was, however, not strong enough to fully explain the absence of rhodamine emission upon
excitation of CB6-CF.
In another control experiment, parent unmodified CB6 was added to a solution
containing 0.5 µM R-S (shown in Figure 2.16). At a lower concentration of CB6, from 0 to 0.3
µM, the intensity somehow decreased. When the concentration was higher than 0.6 µM, the
intensity started to increase. Also here, the fluorescence changes are small and do not explain
the absence of the expected increase in rhodamine fluorescence after FRET.
Based on the proposed analysis of the spectral properties, the designed FRET pair based
on CB6-CF and R-S is not suitable for further study. We need to select another FRET pair with
proper spectral properties. A new FRET pair based on CB7 host-guest interaction is later
achieved and this content will be described in detail in Chapter 3.
2.7 Further Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB7
Figure 2.17 Examples of mono-functionalized CB7 derivatives.
Page 53
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
41
Figure 2.18 MALDI-TOF spectra of CB7-TAMRA and CB7-Cy3.
Page 54
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
42
Besides CB6-CF, we further synthesized four mono-functionalized CB7 derivatives, one will
be explained in the next Chapter and the other three includes two fluorescent dyes in different
emission range and one functional molecule with –COOH at the end (Figure 2.17 and 2.18).
CB7-TAMRA and CB7-Cy3 are reacted by CB7-OPr with commercial 5-TAMRA azide and
Cyanine 3 azide. CB7-O2O is reacted with synthesized azido molecule with functional groups
from Prof. Dr. Leif Schroeder. The synthesis procedures to get CB7-TAMRA and CB7-Cy3
are the same with CB6-CF procedure. The procedure to get CB7-O2O is quite different which
takes tedious work to optimize the reaction conditions.
Figure 2.19 The synthesis route of CB7-NIe and CB7-O2O.
From our collaborator Prof. Dr. Leif Schroeder, we received two chemicals (1 and 2,
Figure 2.19) designed to react with CB7-OPr. The first try was following the proved successful
procedure of CB6-CF, unfortunately no product was acquired by characterizations with TLC
and MS. However, click reaction is well known as efficient reaction and it should work in
principle between azide and alkyne. Therefore, twelve different reaction conditions were tried
for the reaction by varying the Cu source, ligand and solution composition (Table 2.1). The
stock solutions of chemicals used in table 2.1: CB7-OPr: 30 mM in DMSO; NaHCO3: 1 M in
H2O; NaAsc: 1 M in H2O; TBTA: 376 mM in DMSO; BPDS: 388 mM in H2O; CuSO4: 1M in
H2O; CuI: 0.5 M in DMSO; CuBr: 0.5 M in DMSO; DIPEA: 0.742 g/mL in H2O. For each of
the reaction it combines 3 steps. Firstly it was reacted for 24 h in room temperature. Without
new spot observed on TLC temperature was increased to 50 °C for another 24 h reaction time.
Page 55
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
43
If still no new spot shown on TLC, the temperature then increased to 90°C. The first and second
step were characterized by TCL, as well as the third step, no new spot appeared by all of them.
Finally we chose MALDI-TOF to detect products after the third step reaction due to the very
low solubility of mono-functionalized CB7 derivatives.
Table 2.1 Different conditions for the reactions between CB7-OPr and 1 or 2.
No. Azide CB7-
OPr
Cu
source Ligand Azide NaAsc/Base Solvent Temperature
1 1
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
6 µL
12 µmol
120 mM
BPDS
8 µL
6 µmol
60 mM
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
6 µL = Cu2+
12 µmol
120 mM
50 µl
DMSO/H2
O
1:1
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
2 1
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
1.5 µL
3 µmol
30 mM
BPDS
8 µL
6 µmol
60 mM
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
1.5 µL = Cu2+
3 µmol
30 mM
50 µl
DMSO/
100 mM
NaHCO3
1:1
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
3 1
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
1.5 µL
3 µmol
30 mM
none
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
3 µL = 2 x Cu2+
6 µmol
60 mM
50 µl
DMSO/H2
O
1:1
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
4 1
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
2 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
TBTA
5 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
2 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
50 µl
DMSO/
100 mM
NaHCO3
1:1
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
5 1
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
1.5 µL
3 µmol
30 mM
none
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
3 µL = 2 x Cu2+
6 µmol
60 mM
50 µl
DMSO/H2
O/t-BuOH
45:45:10
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
6 2
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
6 µL
12 µmol
120 mM
BPDS
8 µL
6 µmol
60 mM
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
6 µL = Cu2+
12 µmol
120 mM
50 µl
DMSO/H2
O
1:1
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
7 2
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
1.5 µL
3 µmol
30 mM
BPDS
8 µL
6 µmol
60 mM
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
1.5 µL = Cu2+
3 µmol
30 mM
50 µl
DMSO/
100 mM
NaHCO3
1:1
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
8 2
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
1.5 µL
3 µmol
30 mM
none
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
3 µL = 2 x Cu2+
6 µmol
60 mM
50 µl
DMSO/H2
O
1:1
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
9 2
15 µL
1 µmol
10 mM
CuSO4
2 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
TBTA
5 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
NaAsc
2 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
50 µl
DMSO/
100 mM
NaHCO3
1:1
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
10 2
30 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
CuI
2 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
none
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
DIPEA
0.7 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
50 µL
DMSO
only
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
11 2
30 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
CuI
2 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
TBTA
5 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
10 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
DIPEA
0.7 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
50 µL
DMSO
only
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
12 2
30 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
CuBr
2 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
none
10 µL
2 µmol
20 mM
DIPEA
0.7 µL
4 µmol
40 mM
50 µL
DMSO
only
r.t./24 h
no product 50 °C/24 h
no product 90 °C/24 h
Page 56
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
44
Figure 2.20 MALDI-TOF spectra of reactants from condition 11 and 12.
As shown in Figure 2.20, MS of Samples from condition 11 and 12 show the peak 1574
m/z, which comes from the complex of CB7-O2O with Na+, demonstrating that CB7-O2O can
Page 57
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
45
be successfully synthesized by using condition 11 and 12. The peak is very tinny because of the
low solubility of the aimed product. The explanation of no new spot shown on TLC plate is still
missing. In conclusion, the difficulty of the click reactions based on CB7-OPr is depend on the
azido molecules. To successfully synthesize the target product, optimization of reaction
conditions plays a crucial role.
2.8 References
(1) W. L. Mock and N. Y. Shih, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 4440-4446.
(2) S. Liu, C. Ruspic, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakrabarti, P. Y. Zavalij and L. Isaacs, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 15959-15967.
(3) L. Cao, M. Sekutor, P. Y. Zavalij, K. Mlinaric-Majerski, R. Glaser and L. Isaacs, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 988-993.
(4) S. Moghaddam, C. Yang, M. Rekharsky, Y. H. Ko, K. Kim, Y. Inoue and M. K. Gilson, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 3570-3581.
(5) S. Kasera, F. Biedermann, J. J. Baumberg, O. A. Scherman and S. Mahajan, Nano Lett.,
2012, 12, 5924-5928.
(6) W. M. Nau, M. Florea and K. I. Assaf, Isr. J. Chem., 2011, 51, 559-577.
(7) K. I. Assaf and W. M. Nau, Chem Soc Rev., 2015, 44, 394-418.
(8) S. Y. Jon, N. Selvapalam, D. H. Oh, J. K. Kang, S. Y. Kim, Y. J. Jeon, J. W. Lee and K.
Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 10186-10187.
(9) N. Zhao, G. O. Lloyd and O. A. Scherman, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3070-3072.
(10) W. H. Huang, P. Y. Zavalij and L. Isaacs, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 2577-2580.
(11) D. Lucas, T. Minami, G. Iannuzzi, L. Cao, J. B. Wittenberg, P. Anzenbacher, Jr. and L.
Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 17966-17976.
(12) B. Vinciguerra, L. Cao, J. R. Cannon, P. Y. Zavalij, C. Fenselau and L. Isaacs, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 13133-13140.
(13) L. Cao and L. Isaacs, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 3072-3075.
(14) L. Gilberg, M. S. Khan, M. Enderesova and V. Sindelar, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 2446-2449.
(15) S. M. Liu, L. Xu, C. T. Wu and Y. Q. Feng, Talanta, 2004, 64, 929-934.
(16) S. Kushwaha and P. P. Sudhakar, Anal., 2012, 137, 3242-3245.
(17) Y. J. Jeon, H. Kim, S. Jon, N. Selvapalam, D. H. Oh, I. Seo, C. S. Park, S. R. Jung, D. S.
Koh and K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 15944-15945.
(18) J. Kim, Y. Ahn, K. M. Park, Y. Kim, Y. H. Ko, D. H. Oh and K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. , 2007, 46, 7393-7395.
Page 58
Chapter 2 Synthesis of Mono-Functionalized CB6 and CB7
46
(19) E. R. Nagarajan, D. H. Oh, N. Selvapalam, Y. H. Ko, K. M. Park and K. Kim, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2006, 47, 2073-2075.
(20) D. Kim, E. Kim, J. Kim, K. M. Park, K. Baek, M. Jung, Y. H. Ko, W. Sung, H. S. Kim, J.
H. Suh, C. G. Park, O. S. Na, D.-k. Lee, K. E. Lee, S. S. Han and K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2007, 119, 3541-3544.
(21) D. W. Lee, K. M. Park, M. Banerjee, S. H. Ha, T. Lee, K. Suh, S. Paul, H. Jung, J. Kim,
N. Selvapalam, S. H. Ryu and K. Kim, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3, 154-159.
(22) D. Kim, E. Kim, J. Lee, S. Hong, W. Sung, N. Lim, C. G. Park and K. Kim, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 9908-9919.
(23) K. Baek, G. Yun, Y. Kim, D. Kim, R. Hota, I. Hwang, D. Xu, Y. H. Ko, G. H. Gu, J. H.
Suh, C. G. Park, B. J. Sung and K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 6523-6528.
(24) M. Munteanu, S. Choi and H. Ritter, Macromolecules, 2009, 42, 3887-3891.
(25) H. K. Lee, K. M. Park, Y. J. Jeon, D. Kim, D. H. Oh, H. S. Kim, C. K. Park and K. Kim,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 5006-5007.
(26) K. M. Park, K. Suh, H. Jung, D. W. Lee, Y. Ahn, J. Kim, K. Baek and K. Kim, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 0, 71-73.
(27) E. Kim, J. Lee, D. Kim, K. E. Lee, S. S. Han, N. Lim, J. Kang, C. G. Park and K. Kim,
Chem. Commun., 2009, 0, 1472-1474.
(28) K. M. Park, J. A. Yang, H. Jung, J. Yeom, J. S. Park, K. H. Park, A. S. Hoffman, S. K.
Hahn and K. Kim, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 2960-2968.
(29) Y. Ahn, Y. Jang, N. Selvapalam, G. Yun and K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52,
3140-3144.
(30) M. M. Ayhan, H. Karoui, M. Hardy, A. Rockenbauer, L. Charles, R. Rosas, K. Udachin,
P. Tordo, D. Bardelang and O. Ouari, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 10238-10245.
Page 59
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
47
Chapter 3. Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a
Host-Guest FRET Pair
Page 60
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
48
Page 61
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
49
This chapter is derived from the content of the following publication:
Shuai Zhang, Khaleel I. Assaf, Chusen Huang, Andreas Hennig* and Werner M. Nau*,
Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair, Chem. Comm., 2019, 55, 671-674.
In this chapter, a supramolecular host-guest FRET pair based on a carboxyfluorescein-labelled
cucurbit[7]uril (CB7-CF, as acceptor) and the fluorescent dye 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI, as donor) is developed for sensing of DNA. In comparison to the commercial DNA
staining dye SYBR Green I, the new chemosensing ensemble offers dual-emission signals,
which allows a linear ratiometric response over a wide concentration range.
3.1 Introduction
Fluorescent chemosensors are receiving increasing attention, especially for biological
analytes.1-2 For example, numerous commercially available fluorescent dyes, such as SYBR-
Green I, bind to the minor groove of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), which can be exploited
for sensing in medical diagnostics, e.g., for real-time PCR.3-6 Most of these dye-intercalation
techniques are based on single-wavelength monitoring, whereas dual emitting probes, which
allow ratiometric sensing for more precise quantification, are mostly based on the recognization
of DNA hybridization. This has been achieved by using pyrene-functionalized molecular
beacons (with either oligonucleotide7 or peptide8 backbones), locked nucleic acids,9 and
perylene-based probes,10-12 but these probes only respond to complementary DNA sequences.
An alternative sensing strategy to direct binding, such as intercalation, is indicator
displacement. Macrocycles such as cyclodextrins,13-15 calixarenes,16-18 crown ethers,19-21 and
cucurbit[n]urils22-23 (CBn) have been abundantly used in combination with fluorescent dyes to
quantify analytes by the latter strategy, including the cited examples of the most desirable
ratiometric sensing. With the aim to monitor analyte formation or depletion and to measure the
kinetics of enzymatic reactions, macrocycle/dye reporter pairs have also been implemented in
supramolecular tandem assays,24-31 including the enzymatic conversion of nucleotides,22, 32-41
but they have not yet been employed for DNA sensing.
CBn macrocycles, and in particular the medium-sized homologue CB7, stand out as
recognition motifs due to their high analyte affinities and selectivities.42-44 The known assays
rely on a direct affinity between analyte and CBn, which results in a competitive displacement
of the fluorescent indicator dye. However, although indirect interactions between DNA or
nucleotides and CBn, mediated by other guests, have been described,45-52 applications to DNA
sensing are elusive. Herein, we establish a nonconventional approach to DNA sensing, which
relies neither on a simple intercalation of a fluorescent dye with the analyte (DNA) nor on a
direct binding of DNA to a recognition site, but rather on a competitive binding of a fluorescent
Page 62
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
50
dye to an acceptor-labelled CB7 and DNA; this allows a ratiometric DNA sensor based on
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between the two chromophores to be set up
according to Figure 3.1. The new application complements recent work on fluorescent dye-
conjugated CBn derivatives with cyanine-3 and tetramethylrhodamine for the detection of
vesicle fusion53-55 and cellular imaging.56
Figure 3.1 (a) Molecular structures of CB7-CF and DAPI. (b) Schematic illustration of a DNA
chemosensing ensemble based on FRET between DAPI (donor) and CB7-CF (acceptor).
3.2 Synthesis of CB7-CF
The synthesis of CB7-carboxyfluorescein (CB7-CF) involved labelling through click
reaction of the azide derivative of carboxyfluorescein (CF, using commercial 6-FAM-
azide), with monofunctionalised propargyl-CB7 (CB7-OPr)57-58 (see Figure 3.2). Since
the CF chromophore is equatorially attached to the outer wall of CB7, its hydrophobic
cavity remains accessible for guest binding. Intramolecular or intermolecular complexation of
CF in the cavity, which presents a common obstacle when using monofunctionalized CBn
derivatives,59 does not interfere, because of the anionic nature of CF, which is incompatible
with the cation-receptor propensity of CBn homologues.60
Page 63
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
51
Figure 3.2 Synthesis of CB7-CF.
3.3 Optical Characterizations of FRET Pair
300 400 500 600
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
Wavelength (nm)
DAPI
CB7-CF
(a)
400 500 600
0
250
500
Wavelength (nm)
(b)
Figure 3.3 (a) Normalized absorption (solid) and emission (dashed) spectra of DAPI
(blue) and CB7-CF (green). (b) Emission spectra (ex = 360 nm) of 2 µM DAPI (blue),
1 µM CB7-CF (green), and a mixture of 2 µM DAPI and 1 µM CB7-CF (orange).
The encapsulation of the fluorescent DNA stain 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, as
chloride salt), by CB7-CF allows efficient FRET to occur. The spectral characterization of the
FRET pair was performed by UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy (Figure 3.3).
The emission spectrum of DAPI has a significant overlap with the absorption spectrum of CB7-
CF, which fulfills the principal requirement of FRET. The distance between DAPI and CB7-
CF was modelled to be between 5.9 Å (minimum) and 10.8 Å (maximum), which falls
Page 64
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
52
sufficiently far below the calculated critical Förster radius of the system (R0 = 33.3 Å, Figure
3.4) to allow quantitative FRET (>99%).
Figure 3.4 DFT-optimized structures (B3LYP/3-21G*) of different possible co-conformations
for the CB7-CF/DAPI complex (in gas phase). The distance (d) between the center of mass of
the CF and DAPI is given in Å. The structure shown in (a) was found to be more stable than
that in (b) by 4.9 kcal/mol.
Optical titration experiments were limited by the reduced water solubility of CB7-CF
(ca. 5 M in pure water and ca. 30 M in the presence of 0.5% DMSO), but the fluorescence
intensities were sufficiently high to allow an analysis also in this solubility range. The
fluorescence titration of the donor (DAPI, ex = 360 nm) upon addition of acceptor (CB7-CF)
was performed first in the presence of 0.5% DMSO (Figure 3.5 a). As expected, there was a
strong rise in fluorescence of CB7-CF, which afforded, after correction for direct excitation of
CF at the excitation wavelength of DAPI, a binding constant of (1.4 0.1) × 106 M–1.
Noteworthy, the fluorescence of the donor did not decrease, as expected for quantitative FRET,
but showed a slight increase. This phenomenon is well known in FRET experiments with
commercial labelling agents (6-FAM-azide) and can be traced back to a nonquantitative
labelling with acceptor.61 The comparison of the fluorescence intensity of DAPI alone and that
extrapolated to high concentrations of CB7-CF, along with the expected fluorescence
enhancement factor in an unlabelled CB7 cavity (ca. 12, see Figure 3.6) allowed us to estimate
the labelling degree with CF as 90%.
Page 65
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
53
400 500 600 7000
100
200
300
400
I
I
(b)
[DAPI]
CB7-CF fluorescence
DAPI fluorescence
/nm
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80
200
400
[DAPI]/M
400 500 600 7000
150
300
450
I/I 0
I(a)
/nm
[CB7-CF]0 3 6 9 12 15
0
10
20
30
[CB7-CF]/M
Figure 3.5 (a) Fluorescence spectral changes (ex = 360 nm) with increasing amounts of
CB7-CF (0 to 15 µM) in the presence of 1 µM DAPI; the inset shows the fluorescence
titration (em = 520 nm) with increasing concentration of CB7-CF (R2 = 0.998).
Corrected for direct excitation of CF. (b) Fluorescence spectral changes (ex = 360 nm)
with increasing amounts of DAPI (0 to 7.4 µM) in the presence of 1 µM CB7-CF; the
inset shows the fluorescence titration (em = 450 nm) with increasing concentration of
DAPI in the presence of only DAPI (black curve, R2 = 0.998), 1 µM CB7-CF (red curve,
R2 = 0.999), and 1 µM CB7 (blue curve, R2 = 0.998). Fitting curves were obtained by a
1:1 host-guest binding isotherm.
400 450 500 550 600 650 700
0
100
200
300
400
I
I
/nm
0 2 4 6 8 100
150
300
450
[CB7]/M
Ka = (2.8 0.2)
Figure 3.6 Variation of the fluorescence spectrum (ex = 360 nm) of 1 μM DAPI in 10 mM
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2, upon addition of CB7. Inset: CB7 concentration dependence of the
fluorescence intensity at 470 nm, R2 = 0.998. The curve was fitted by 1:1 binding stoichiometry.
The reverse titration allowed us to demonstrate operation of the FRET system in neat
water (10 mM ammonium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, Figure 3.5 b), where the solubility of CB7-
Page 66
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
54
CF was limited to ca. 5 M. Upon addition of increasing amounts of donor (DAPI) to a CB7-
CF solution (1 µM) its fluorescence (ex = 360 nm, obs = 450 nm) increased. However, the
fluorescence increase (red line) fell far below the 12-fold increase observed upon addition to a
corresponding CB7 solution (1 µM, blue line). This is due to the fact that the DAPI fluorescence
in the CB7-CF cavity is effectively quenched by FRET (also reflected in an increased CF
fluorescence) and not enhanced as in unlabelled CB7, where a microenvironmental effect
enhances the fluorescence.62 Comparison of the fluorescence intensity of DAPI in the presence
of CB7-CF with that in the absence of any host further indicates a slight increase (compare red
and black lines), which can be attributed to the nonquantitative acceptor labelling already
exposed in the titration with acceptor (see above, Figure 3.5 a). Fitting of the fluorescence
titrations by taking into account these boundary conditions afforded a binding constant between
DAPI and CB7-CF of (5.2 0.5) × 106 M1, comparable to that between DAPI and CB7 in the
same ammonium phosphate buffer ((2.8 0.2) × 106 M–1), but below that in neat water (11
× 106 M–1),62 due to the competition of ammonium cation binding to CB7 in the buffer.63
400 500 600 700
0
150
300
450
I
(a)
1 M CB7-CF+20 M AMADA+[DAPI] [DAPI] 0 M
[DAPI] 0.04 M
[DAPI] 0.15 M
[DAPI] 0.38 M
[DAPI] 0.82 M
[DAPI] 1.55 M
[DAPI] 2.50 M
[DAPI] 3.76 M
[DAPI] 5.17 M
[DAPI] 6.36 M
[DAPI] 7.37 M
/nm
400 500 600 700
0
150
300
450
/nm
I
32 M AMADA
1 M CB7-CF 7.4 M [DAPI]
(b)
Figure 3.7 (a) Fluorescence titrations (ex = 360 nm) with increasing amounts of DAPI
(0 to 7.4 µM) in the presence of 1 µM CB7-CF as well as 20 µM AMADA. (b) Fluorescence
spectra (ex = 360 nm) of 1 μM CB7-CF and 7.4 μM DAPI without (black line) and with (red
line) 32 μM AMADA in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2. The addition of AMADA leads to a
strong fluorescence decrease of CB7-CF.
Note that the value in the aqueous buffer lies slightly above that determined in the
presence of 0.5% DMSO (1.4 × 106 M–1, see above), a co-solvent which is expected to slightly
reduce binding as a consequence of a reduced hydrophobic driving force.64 The reversibility of
the FRET process and the analyte responsiveness of the system was established through control
experiments with 1-aminomethyladamantane (AMADA), a known competitive binder of CB7
(see Figure 3.7).
Page 67
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
55
0 10 20 30 40 500
1
2
3
4
DAPI+CB7-CF
DAPI+CB7
DAPI
IRF
Lo
g (
Co
un
ts)
t /ns
Figure 3.8 Time-resolved fluorescence decay traces of 5 µM DAPI alone (blue) and in
the presence of 10 µM CB7-CF (black) and CB7 (red); instrument response function is
shown in magenta. exc = 373 nm, obs = 450 nm.
Table 3.1 Fitting results of lifetime decays of DAPI with and without CB7 or CB7-CF
in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 with 0.5% DMSO.
Sample τ/ns B Rel% χ2
DAPIa 1 = 0.29 0.056 81.1
2.24
2 = 2.77 0.001 18.9
DAPI 1 = 0.31 0.054 79.2
2.66
2 = 2.74 0.002 20.8
DAPI+CB7 1 = 1.59 0.026 100 2.40
DAPI+CB7-CF 1 = 0.65 0.021 30.2
1.94
2 = 3.05 0.010 69.8
a Without DMSO.
The FRET pair was also characterized by nanosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy
(Figure 3.8 and Table 3.1). DAPI has a long fluorescence lifetime component (2.75 ns).65 Upon
complexation by CB7, the lifetime is reduced to ca. 1.6 ns, which presents an unusual but
previously documented response;66 generally, an increase in fluorescence intensity upon CB7
complexation is accompanied by an increased fluorescence lifetime.60 This unusual behavior
points to an increase of the radiative lifetime () of DAPI upon CB7 complexation, which is
likely related to a conformational realignment of the chromophore. From the Förster radius of
the FRET pair, a quantitative (>99%) fluorescence quenching of DAPI was expected in the
DAPI-CB7-CF complex. Unfortunately, due to the interference of nonquantitative (90%)
acceptor labelling, a residual long-lived component attributable to DAPI remained even in the
Page 68
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
56
presence of an excess of CB7-CF. Noteworthy, the fluorescence lifetime of the CF
chromophore in CB7-CF (3.6 ns) remained virtually the same as that in free CF,67 which
demonstrates that the CF chromophore in CB7-CF and also in the DAPI-CB7-CF complex is
not quenched.
3.4 DNA Sensing by FRET Pair
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
150
300
450
20 °C to 90 °C Em = 450 nm
20 °C to 90 °C Em = 520 nm
90 °C to 20 °C Em = 450 nm
90 °C to 20 °C Em = 520 nm
I
T/°C
30 60 90
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
I 45
0/I
52
0
T/°C
(b)
400 500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
I
/nm
(a)
0 5 10 15 200.0
0.3
0.6
0.9y = 43x + 0.08
R2 = 0.995
I 45
0/I
52
0
[DNA]/(gmL1)
Figure 3.9 (a) Fluorescence spectra (ex = 360 nm) of 0.5 M DAPI and 1 M CB7-CF
with increasing concentration of salmon sperm DNA (0 to 20 g/mL). The inset shows
the linear relationship between the fluorescence intensity ratio (I450/I520) and the
concentration of salmon sperm DNA (0 to 20 g/mL). (b) Temperature-dependent
fluorescence intensity at 450 nm and 520 nm (ex = 360 nm) from 20 to 90 °C. The inset
shows the reversible changes in I450/I520 ratios between 20 and 90 °C.
DAPI is well known to intercalate strongly into the minor groove of DNA (binding affinity of
107 M–1 per nucleotide, or 1010 M–1 for a typical DNA with ca. 1000 base pairs),68-69 but binds
with micromolar affinity to CB7,62 which should allow for an efficient relocation of the dye
from CB7 upon addition or formation of DNA if the concentrations are favourably selected.70
Accordingly, we conducted a fluorescence titration of the pre-assembled FRET pair (0.5 µM
DAPI and 1 µM CB7-CF) with Type III salmon sperm DNA (Figure 3.9 a). With increasing
concentration of DNA, DAPI is relocated from CB7-CF, where it no longer serves as FRET
donor and, thereby, reduced the CF fluorescence at 520 nm, into DNA, where its own
fluorescence at 450 nm becomes enhanced. The ratio of the fluorescence intensity values
(I450/I520) increased linearly in the picomolar range (up to 20 µg/mL), which sets up an excellent
DNA chemosensing ensemble with an LOD value (limit of detection) of ca. 60 ng/mL (inset in
Figure 3.9 a). A plateau value was reached at DNA concentrations above 0.1 mg/mL (Figure
3.10 a), indicating that DAPI relocation from CB7 to DNA is quantitative.
Page 69
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
57
400 500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
I
/nm
I450
/I520
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
[DNA]/(mgmL1)
(a)
400 500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
I
/nm
(b)
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50
250
500I
[DNA]/(mgmL1
)
550 600 650 700
0
250
500
750
1000
I
/nm
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0
500
1000I
[DNA]/(mgmL1
)
(c)
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.5 M DAPI
0.5 M SYBR Green
0.5 M DAPI + 1 M CB7-CF
[DNA]/(mgmL1
)
I/I
(d)
Figure 3.10 (a) Fluorescence spectra (ex = 360 nm) of 0.5 M DAPI and 1 M CB7-CF with
increasing concentration of salmon sperm DNA (0 to 0.5 mg/mL). The inset shows the
corresponding change in the fluorescence intensity ratio at 450 nm and 520 nm. (b) (c) Variation
of the fluorescence spectrum of 0.5 μM DAPI (ex = 360 nm) and of 0.5 μM SYBR (ex =
497 nm) upon addition of salmon sperm DNA. The inset shows the dependence of the
fluorescence intensity at 450 nm on DNA concentration and at 520 nm on DNA concentration.
(d) Normalized fluorescence intensity of DAPI, SYBR-Green, and DAPI/CB7-CF with dame
concentration of fluorescence dye in dependence on DNA concentration. Note that for
DAPI/CB7-CF the ratiometric response is shown.
The performance of the dual-wavelength monitoring system was directly contrasted
(Figure 3 b-d) to DAPI alone and also to commercial SYBR-Green I, a gold standard for the
detection of DNA in PCR technologies.71 Although the conventional intercalators excelled with
respect to the absolute fluorescence enhancement factor upon DNA addition, the DAPI/CB7-
CF system showed a much larger linear-response range, which is advantageous for absolute
quantification. With identical instrumental settings, SYBR-Green I showed an approximately
linear response up to 3 g/mL, while the range of the FRET system extends up to 20 g/mL
(Figure 3.9 a). Consequently, we propose that the DAPI/CB7-CF FRET pair can be used as a
Page 70
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
58
complementary and non-proprietary indicator dye for nucleotide sensing technologies,
including real-time PCR. As a proof of principle, we carried out fluorescence-based DNA
melting experiments, which demonstrated that the FRET system responds reversibly to the
melting of DNA in dependence on temperature (Figure 3.9 b); interestingly, the heating and
cooling curves displayed a large hysteresis, presumably as a consequence of the more complex
competitive equilibria involved when compared to a simple dye-intercalation approach.
3.5 Conclusions
In conclusion, we have introduced a host-guest FRET pair based on the macrocyclic host CB7
labelled with carboxyfluorescein as the acceptor and the nucleic stain DAPI as donor and guest.
We demonstrated that the resulting host-guest FRET ensemble can be used for quantitative
sensing of DNA with an excellent linear dependence of the ratiometric fluorescence intensities
(I450/I520). The approach opens a new avenue to highly accurate DNA quantification such as
real-time PCR, for which very few alternatives exist to the presently employed proprietary dyes.
Moreover, this approach provides potential strategy for new genetic method to convert single-
wavelength sensor into ratiometric probes.
3.6 References
(1) L. He, B. Dong, Y. Liu and W. Lin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 6449-6461.
(2) D. Wu, A. C. Sedgwick, T. Gunnlaugsson, E. U. Akkaya, J. Yoon and T. D. James, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 7105-7123.
(3) T. B. Morrison, J. J. Weis and C. T. Wittwer, Biotechniques, 1998, 24, 954-958, 960, 962.
(4) D. Muñoz-Espín and M. Serrano, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2014, 15, 482-496.
(5) J. Qiao, H. Tang and Y.-X. Fu, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 2017, 45, 16-20.
(6) M. R. de Galarreta and A. Lujambio, Nat. Cell Biol., 2017, 19, 1008-1009.
(7) C. Holzhauser and H. A. Wagenknecht, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 7268-7272.
(8) J. Wu, Y. Zou, C. Li, W. Sicking, I. Piantanida, T. Yi and C. Schmuck, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2012, 134, 1958-1961.
(9) M. E. Østergaard and P. J. Hrdlicka, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 5771-5788.
(10) L. Huang and S.-W. Tam-Chang, Chem. Comm., 2011, 47, 2291-2293.
(11) Y. Wang, J. Chen, Y. Chen, W. Li and C. Yu, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86, 4371-4378.
(12) G. H. Aryal, L. Huang and K. W. Hunter, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 76448-76452.
(13) M. A. Hossain, H. Mihara and A. Ueno, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11178-11179.
(14) N. Li, L. Qi, J. Qiao and Y. Chen, Anal. Chem., 2016, 88, 1821-1826.
Page 71
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
59
(15) N. Wang, X. Yu, K. Zhang, C. A. Mirkin and J. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 12354-
12357.
(16) X.-l. Ni, X. Zeng, C. Redshaw and T. Yamato, J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, 5696-5702.
(17) H. M. Chawla and T. Gupta, Tetrahedron Lett., 2015, 56, 793-796.
(18) V. S. Mummidivarapu, S. Bandaru, D. S. Yarramala, K. Samanta, D. S. Mhatre and C. P.
Rao, Anal. Chem., 2015, 87, 4988-4995.
(19) M. Baruah, W. Qin, R. A. Vallée, D. Beljonne, T. Rohand, W. Dehaen and N. Boens, Org.
Lett., 2005, 7, 4377-4380.
(20) J. Yin, C. Li, D. Wang and S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2010, 114, 12213-12220.
(21) H. Wang, L. Xue and H. Jiang, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 3844-3847.
(22) A. Praetorius, D. M. Bailey, T. Schwarzlose and W. M. Nau, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 4089-
4092.
(23) J. Vázquez, P. Remón, R. N. Dsouza, A. I. Lazar, J. F. Arteaga, W. M. Nau and U. Pischel,
Chem. Eur. J., 2014, 20, 9897-9901.
(24) D. M. Bailey, A. Hennig, V. D. Uzunova and W. M. Nau, Chem. Eur. J., 2008, 14, 6069-
6077.
(25) R. N. Dsouza, U. Pischel and W. M. Nau, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 7941-7980.
(26) G. Ghale and W. M. Nau, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 2150-2159.
(27) J. Wu, B. Kwon, W. Liu, E. V. Anslyn, P. Wang and J. S. Kim, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115,
7893-7943.
(28) L. You, D. Zha and E. V. Anslyn, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 7840-7892.
(29) H. Yin, F. Dumur, Y. Niu, M. M. Ayhan, O. Grauby, W. Liu, C. Wang, D. Siri, R. Rosas
and A. Tonetto, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 33220-33228.
(30) Z. Zheng, W.-C. Geng, J. Gao, Y.-Y. Wang, H. Sun and D.-S. Guo, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9,
2087-2091.
(31) J. Gao, Z. Zheng, L. Shi, S.-Q. Wu, H. Sun and D.-S. Guo, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2018,
14, 1840-1845.
(32) A. Hennig, H. Bakirci and W. M. Nau, Nat. Meth., 2007, 4, 629-632.
(33) W. M. Nau, G. Ghale, A. Hennig, H. Bakirci and D. M. Bailey, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
131, 11558-11570.
(34) M. Florea and W. M. Nau, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 1033-1039.
(35) G. Ghale, V. Ramalingam, A. R. Urbach and W. M. Nau, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133,
7528-7535.
(36) M. Florea and W. M. Nau, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 9338-9342.
Page 72
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
60
(37) M. Florea, S. Kudithipudi, A. Rei, M. J. González‐Álvarez, A. Jeltsch and W. M. Nau,
Chem. Eur. J., 2012, 18, 3521-3528.
(38) S. Joshi, I. Ghosh, S. Pokhrel, L. Madler and W. M. Nau, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 5668-5679.
(39) A. Norouzy, Z. Azizi and W. M. Nau, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 792-795.
(40) F. Biedermann, D. Hathazi and W. M. Nau, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 4977-4980.
(41) S. Sinn and F. Biedermann, Isr. J. Chem., 2018, 58, 357-412.
(42) K. I. Assaf and W. M. Nau, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 394-418.
(43) S. J. Barrow, S. Kasera, M. J. Rowland, J. del Barrio and O. A. Scherman, Chem. Rev,
2015, 115, 12320-12406.
(44) S. Li, H. Yin, I. W. Wyman, Q. Zhang, D. H. Macartney and R. Wang, J. Org. Chem.,
2016, 81, 1300-1303.
(45) H. Isobe, N. Tomita, J. W. Lee, H. J. Kim, K. Kim and E. Nakamura, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2000, 112, 4427-4430.
(46) C. Marquez, U. Pischel and W. M. Nau, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 3911-3914.
(47) C. P. Carvalho, A. Norouzy, V. Ribeiro, W. M. Nau and U. Pischel, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2015, 13, 2866-2869.
(48) D. V. Berdnikova, T. M. Aliyeu, T. Paululat, Y. V. Fedorov, O. A. Fedorova and H. Ihmels,
Chem. Comm., 2015, 51, 4906-4909.
(49) K. Gavvala and S. Satpathi, J. Lumin., 2016, 171, 234-237.
(50) X. J. Zhang, Y. M. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Chen and Y. Liu, ChemistrySelect, 2016, 1, 685-
690.
(51) X. Zhou, X. Su, P. Pathak, R. Vik, B. Vinciguerra, L. Isaacs and J. Jayawickramarajah, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 13916-13921.
(52) Y. Zhou, L. Gao, X. Tong, Q. Li, Y. Fei, Y. Yu, T. Ye, X.-S. Zhou and Y. Shao, Anal.
Chem., 2018, 90, 13183-13187.
(53) B. Gong, B.-K. Choi, J.-Y. Kim, D. Shetty, Y. H. Ko, N. Selvapalam, N. K. Lee and K.
Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 8908-8911.
(54) M. Li, A. Lee, K. L. Kim, J. Murray, A. Shrinidhi, G. Sung, K. M. Park and K. Kim,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 130, 2142-2147.
(55) M. Li, A. Lee, K. L. Kim, J. Murray, A. Shrinidhi, G. Sung, K. M. Park and K. Kim,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 130, 2142-2147.
(56) A. T. Bockus, L. C. Smith, A. G. Grice, O. A. Ali, C. C. Young, W. Mobley, A. Leek, J.
L. Roberts, B. Vinciguerra and L. Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 16549-16552.
Page 73
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
61
(57) M. M. Ayhan, H. Karoui, M. Hardy, A. Rockenbauer, L. Charles, R. Rosas, K. Udachin,
P. Tordo, D. Bardelang and O. Ouari, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 10238-10245.
(58) S. Zhang, Z. Domínguez, K. I. Assaf, M. Nilam, T. Thiele, U. Pischel, U. Schedler, W. M.
Nau and A. Hennig, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 8575-8581.
(59) Y. Yu, J. Li, M. Zhang, L. Cao and L. Isaacs, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 3762-3765.
(60) W. M. Nau and J. Mohanty, Int. J. Photoenergy, 2005, 7, 133-141.
(61) J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy,Third Edition, 2006, Springer
US.
(62) Z. Miskolczy, L. Biczók, M. Megyesi and I. Jablonkai, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113, 1645-
1651.
(63) C. Márquez, R. R. Hudgins and W. M. Nau, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 5806-5816.
(64) F. Biedermann, W. M. Nau and H. J. Schneider, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 11158-
11171.
(65) M. Barcellona, G. Cardiel and E. Gratton, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1990, 170,
270-280.
(66) L. Biczók, V. Wintgens, Z. Miskolczy and M. Megyesi, Isr. J. Chem., 2011, 51, 625-633.
(67) T. French, P. So, J. Weaver, DJ, T. Coelho‐Sampaio, E. Gratton, J. Voss, EW and J.
Carrero, J. Microsc., 1997, 185, 339-353.
(68) S. Y. Breusegem, R. M. Clegg and F. G. Loontiens, J. Mol. Biol., 2002, 315, 1049-1061.
(69) W. C. Tse and D. L. Boger, Acc. Chem. Res., 2004, 37, 61-69.
(70) R. N. Dsouza, A. Hennig and W. M. Nau, Chem. Eur. J., 2012, 18, 3444-3459.
(71) S. Giglio, P. T. Monis and C. P. Saint, Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31, 136.
Page 74
Chapter 3 Ratiometric DNA Sensing with a Host-Guest FRET Pair
62
Page 75
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
63
Chapter 4. Precise Supramolecular Control of
Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
Page 76
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
64
Page 77
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
65
This chapter is derived from the content of the following publication:
Shuai Zhang, Zoe Domínguez, Khaleel I. Assaf, Mohamed Nilam, Thomas Thiele, Uwe
Pischel, Uwe Schedler, Werner M. Nau, and Andreas Hennig, Precise Supramolecular Control
of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro- and Nanoparticles, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9,
8575-8581.
In this chapter we report the controlled surface functionalization of micro- and nanoparticles by
supramolecular host-guest interac-tions. Our idea is to exploit the competition of two high
affinity guests for binding to the surface-bound supramolecular host cucurbit[7]uril (CB7). To
establish our strategy, surface azide groups were introduced to hard-sphere
(poly)methylmethacrylate particles with a grafted layer of poly(acrylic acid), and a propargyl
derivative of CB7 was coupled to the surface by click chemistry. The amount of surface-bound
CB7 was quantified with the high-affinity guest aminomethyladamantane (AMADA), which
revealed CB7 surface coverage densities around 0.3 nmol/cm2 indicative of a 3D layer of CB7
binding sites on the surface. The potential for surface functionalization was demonstrated with
an aminoadamantane-labeled rhodamine (Ada-Rho) as a second high-affinity guest.
Simultaneous incubation of CB7-functionalized particles with both high-affinity guests,
AMADA and Ada-Rho, revealed a simple linear relationship between the resulting surface
coverage densities of the model fluorescent dye and the mole fraction of Ada-Rho in the
incubation mixture. This suggests a highly modular supramolecular strategy for the stable
immobilization of application-relevant molecules on particle surfaces and a precise control of
their surface coverage densities.
4.1 Introduction
The possibility to precisely control the attachment of application-relevant molecules to
the surfaces of micro- and nanoparticles creates a powerful platform technology with a
large number of conceivable applications. A vast number of different methods have
therefore been explored, but the performance of these materials is still limited by the
shortcomings of existing surface functionalization methods.1-3 For example, the highly
specific and strong (Ka 1015 M1) binding interaction between the small-molecule
ligand biotin with the proteins avidin or streptavidin is popular for surface attachment in
initial proof-of-principle studies with nanoparticles,1 but it has also been noted that the
tetrameric structure of the proteins and their large size (i) may induce crosslinking, (ii)
prevent a precise control of conjugate stoichiometry, and (iii) limit the maximum
Page 78
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
66
achievable surface coverage densities.4-6 Alternative and refined strategies to reliably
functionalize particle surfaces with molecular components are thus highly desired to
achieve the transition from proof-of-principle to real applications of nanobioconjugate
materials.1-3
Numerous supramolecular host-guest systems have been previously investigated
with the goal to equip nanoparticles with molecular recognition capabilities, and this has
enabled a large variety of potential applications.7-22 The typically µM to mM affinities
of most synthetic host-guest systems ensure reversible binding, which is highly
desirable, e.g., in nanoparticle polymer composites, to control nanoparticle assembly, or
for drug delivery. However, for surface functionalization aiming towards bioanalytical
applications, host-guest complexes are required, which are sufficiently stable at much
lower concentrations. To account for the low binding affinity, multivalent systems have
been explored, but this strategy sacrifices – similar to the (strept)avidin/biotin system –
control over the binding stoichiometry and induces particle crosslinking.11, 14, 23, 24
Cucurbit[n]urils (CBn, n = 5–8, 10, and 14) composed of n glycoluril units
comprise a class of biocompatible macrocycles, which stand out from all other
supramolecular host molecules by remarkably high binding affinities (Ka > 1017 M1)25-
30 towards certain guest molecules. This exceeds the affinity of biotin with (strept)avidin
and clearly suggests CBn hosts as a complementary tool in bioconjugation.4, 31
Moreover, CBs are highly biocompatible as shown in various applications, e.g., in
enzyme and membrane transport assays,32-36 for immobilization of proteins and cells on
planar surfaces,37-39 for enrichment and isolation of proteins by affinity-beads,40-42 for
supramolecular PEGylation of biopharmaceuticals,43 for multi-stimuli-responsive
release,44 and for protein imaging.45 CBn hosts were also adsorptively attached to metal
surfaces such as planar46, 47 and spherical48-50 gold surfaces, and to iron oxide
nanoparticles through multidentate binding of their carbonyl-fringed portals.51, 52
However, this adsorptive surface functionalization affects the host-guest recognition
properties of the cavity since one of the portals is involved in surface binding. Moreover,
the presence of two carbonyl-fringed portals may lead to particle aggregation.46, 51-53
Herein, we present for the first time the covalent surface modification of small, hard-
sphere core-shell particles with cucurbit[7]uril (CB7). To demonstrate this, we use polymer
microparticles, also known as beads or microspheres, as well as nanoparticles. These particles
play important roles, e.g., in optical tweezers,54 drug delivery,55 medical imaging,56, 57 and in
diagnostic, multiplexing bead-based assays,58-60 as well as lateral flow immunoassays.61, 62 Our
Page 79
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
67
approach affords, similar to the previously established planar surfaces37-39 and porous resins of
large (>40 µm) sepharose beads,40-42 a suitable supramolecular strategy to subsequently
immobilize application-relevant molecules. Moreover, we demonstrate herein, that host-guest
chemistry allows an unprecedented control of surface functionalization of particles in an easily
quantifiable manner.
4.2 Particle Synthesis
Figure 4.1 a) Synthesis of propargyl-CB7 (CB7-OPr). b) Synthesis of CB7-
functionalized PMMA microparticles. c) Optical microscopy image (at 40-fold
magnification) of 5 mg/ml CB7-functionalized PMMA particles in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4,
pH 7.2.
For the synthesis of CB7-functionalized particles, we decided to use copper-catalyzed
azide-alkyne click chemistry (Figure 4.1). To obtain the required propargyl-CB7 (CB7-
OPr), a different procedure than the recently reported method by Zhang and coworkers
was established.63 First, monohydroxylated-CB7 was synthesized according to the
Page 80
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
68
method of Bardelang and coworkers.64 Quantitative conversion into CB7-OPr was then
achieved by repeated cycles of crude product resubmission to propargyl bromide and
sodium hydride in DMSO, and the identity and purity of CB7-OPr was confirmed by
comparison with the reported data (see Electronic Supplementary Information, ESI†).63
As particles, we used microparticles (mean diameter of 2.55 µm) composed of a
compact, hard-sphere poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) core and a grafted layer (111
µmol/g) of poly(acrylic acid) (PAA). These particles were chosen for their ease of
handling, optical transparency, and the possibility for microscopic observation, and they
were previously characterized by us in detail.6, 65-69 In addition, commercially available
nanoparticles (mean diameter of 110 nm) with a hard-sphere polystyrene core and
surface carboxylic acids were also tested.
Azide groups were introduced by reaction of surface COOH groups with 11-azido-3,6,9-
trioxaundecan-1-amine (ATA) using standard amide coupling protocols,6, 65 and CB7
was finally covalently bound to the surface by Cu-catalyzed click chemistry (Figure 4.1
a, b). The resulting particles were washed into 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2, which was
also used for all subsequent experiments. Inspection by optical microscopy indicated no
increased tendency for aggregation compared to the PAA- and ATA-functionalized
particles, and by IR spectroscopy, which was in accordance with surface-immobilized
CB7.
4.3 Quantification of Surface-Bound CB7
The most compelling evidence for surface functionalization with CB7 was obtained by
successful extraction of aminomethyladamantane (AMADA) from 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4,
pH 7.2 using CB7-functionalized particles (Figure 4.2). The ultra-strong affinity of
AMADA to CB7 (Ka ca. 1015 M1)27 was previously exploited by us to evaluate various
surface quantification methods.6, 65-69 Therein, AMADA-putrescine was used as a
chemical labelling agent for surface COOH groups by amide formation and the number
of surface-bound AMADA was determined by extraction of CB7 and subsequent
quantification of remaining CB7 by the fluorescent dye acridine orange (AO).6, 64
Similarly, remaining AMADA is now quantified by addition of a known concentration
of CB7 and AO to the supernatant.
Page 81
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
69
Figure 4.2 Quantification of CB7 on particle surfaces. a) Incubation of CB7-
functionalized particles with AMADA and subsequent centrifugation gives a
supernatant, which can be analyzed to afford the concentration of remaining AMADA
by addition of the fluores-cent dye acridine orange (AO) and CB7. b) Dependence of
fluorescence spectral changes (exc = 450 nm, obs = 510 nm) of the supernatant on the
volume of added CB7-functionalized particles stock solution (10 mg/mL) during
incubation with 25 µM AMADA. And the bottom figure compares CB7-functionalized
(filled circles) and ATA-functionalized particles as control (open circles) in 10 mM
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
In accordance with our expectations, an increase of the fluorescence with
increasing volume of the particle stock solution immediately indicated the particle-
dependent extraction of AMADA and thus successful immobilization of CB7 on the
particle surface (Figure 4.2b). The clearly linear dependence with no indications of the
typical curvature of a reversible binding isotherm is consistent with quantitative binding
between surface-bound CB7 and AMADA, as well as with quantitative binding in the
supernatant analysis (Figure 4.3a). As a consequence, we can determine the average
(bulk) CB7 surface coverage densities from the intersection between the linear increase
and the plateau region in the inset of Figure 4.2, which indicates the amount of particles
required to extract all AMADA from solution.65, 66
Page 82
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
70
500 550 600 650 7000
50
100
150
200
250
0 1 20.2
0.6
1.0F
luo
rescen
ce
Wavelength (nm)
AMADA
a)
F/F
0
[AMADA] (µM)
500 600 700
0
100
200
300
0 30 60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Flu
ore
scen
ce
Wavelength (nm)
amount
of particles
during incubation
b)
F/F
0
Volume (µL)
Figure 4.3 a) Competitive fluorescence titration (λexc = 450 nm) of 2 µM AO and 1.1 µM CB7
in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2. The inset shows the corresponding fluorescence titration (λem
=510 nm) plot normalized to the initial fluorescence intensity and demonstrates quantitative 1:1
binding between AMADA and CB7 in solution. b) Dependence of fluorescence spectral
changes (exc = 450 nm, obs = 510 nm) of the supernatant on the volume of added CB7-
functionalized polymer particles stock solution (10 mg/mL) during incubation with
(dimethylaminomethyl)ferrocene (surface coverage density = 5.5 µmol/g). The inset compares
CB7-functionalized (filled circles) and ATA-functionalized particles as control (open circles).
This simple method to determine the resulting CB7 loading capacities and surface
coverage densities was highly reproducible (Table 4.1, coefficient of variation of ca. 2% for n
= 7) and enabled us to evaluate various reaction conditions and their reproducibility during
surface functionalization in a straightforward manner (Table 4.2). For example, we could show
that washing the particles after click reaction with buffer containing EDTA or not had no
influence on the resulting surface coverage, which suggests that no copper ions remained on
the particle surface (cf. entry #1 and #2 in Table 4.2). Furthermore, we could establish that the
click reaction is considerably reproducible. The resulting loading capacities of three different
reaction batches varied by less than 1% (Table 4.2, entry #1).
Page 83
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
71
Table 4.1 Reproducibility measurements for the quantification of surface-bound CB7.
Experiment loading capacity
(µmol/g)
coupling yield
(%)
CB7 surface density
(nmol/cm2)
1 5.66 5.10 0.286
2 5.81 5.23 0.294
3 5.52 4.97 0.279
4 5.88 5.30 0.297
5 5.63 5.07 0.285
6 5.74 5.17 0.290
7 5.80 5.23 0.293
average 5.72 5.15 0.289
standard deviation 0.11 0.10 0.006
coefficient of
variation ca. 2%
Table 4.2 Reaction results for CB7 surface functionalization.a
entry # reaction conditionsb
loading
capacity
(µmol/g)
coupling yield
(%)c
CB7 surface
density
(nmol/cm2)
1 1) 3 h at pH 5.0, 2) 24 h (with
EDTA)d 5.69 ± 0.04 5.13 ± 0.03 0.288 ± 0.002
2 1) 3 h at pH 5.0, 2) 24 h
(without EDTA) 5.67 5.11 0.287
3 1) 3 h at pH 5.0, 2) 48 h 6.2 5.6 0.32
4 1) 3 h at pH 7.2, 2) 24 h 4.4 4.0 0.22
5 1) 6 h at pH 7.2, 2) 24 h 4.8 4.3 0.24
a Values were determined with the AMADA assay (Section 5.1). b Functionalization of COOH
surface groups with 1) azide groups was performed in pH 5.0 or pH 7.2 buffer for 3 h or 6 h
and then with 2) CB7-OPr in a click reaction for 24 h or 48 h (see Section 4.1 and 4.2 for
details). c With respect to 111 µmol/g surface COOH. d From three replicates.
Page 84
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
72
The resulting CB7 surface coverage densities (ca. 0.3 nmol/cm2, i.e. 1.8 CB7
molecules/nm2 or a loading capacity of ca. 5.7 µmol/g) were significantly higher than
the value for a CB7 monolayer on planar gold surfaces (ca. 0.08 nmol/cm2),38 which is
in accordance with a grafted 3D layer of PAA on the particle surface and thus a 3D layer
of surface-bound CB7. Interestingly, the overall coupling yields in our two-step
functionalization protocol were in very good agreement with typical coupling yields for
amide formation only (ca. 5% with respect to COOH groups of surface PAA),6, 66 which
suggests that the second step, the click reaction to attach CB7 onto the surface, is nearly
quantitative. As controls, azide-functionalized particles lacking CB7 gave no change in
fluorescence intensity (inset of Figure 4.2b), which excluded unspecific binding of
AMADA to the particle surface. As additional controls, identical values for the CB7
surface coverage density were determined by extraction of
(dimethylaminomethyl)ferrocene (Figure 4.3b), which further excludes any unspecific
binding. Moreover, poly(styrene) nanoparticles with surface carboxylic acid groups
could be similarly surface-functionalized and analyzed, which afforded CB7 surface
coverage densities of ca. 0.1 nmol/cm2 (Figure 4.4).
500 600 700
0
200
400
600
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
a)
increasing amount
of nanoparticles
0 50 100 150
150
300
450
600
Flu
ore
scen
ce
Volume (µL)
b)
Figure 4.4 a) Dependence of fluorescence spectral changes (exc = 450 nm, obs = 510 nm) of
the supernatant on the volume of added CB7-functionalized (poly)styrene nanoparticles stock
solution (10 mg/mL) during incubation with 4.56 µM AMADA. b) Respective titration plot.
4.4 Supramolecular Surface Functionalization
The possibility to reliably immobilize application-relevant molecules on the surface of
CB7-functionalized particles was demonstrated with an aminoadamantyl-labeled
rhodamine (Ada-Rho, from Prof. Uwe Pischel) as a model fluorescent dye (Figure 4.5).
Immobilization was simply achieved by addition of CB7-functionalized particles to a
Page 85
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
73
buffered aqueous solution containing Ada-Rho and washing, which gave a bright red
fluorescence from surface-bound Ada-Rho in fluorescence microscopy, whereas the size
of the particles remained same as judged by comparison of the bright-field images of
particles with and without Ada-Rho. The absorbance as well as the fluorescence of the
supernatant decreased linearly with increasing amounts of CB7-functionalized particles
indicating quantitative binding (Figure 4.5). As controls, when the CB7 cavity was
blocked by pre-incubation with the stronger binder AMADA,70 the particles were unable
to extract Ada-Rho. Similarly, no Ada-Rho extraction was observed with ATA-
functionalized particles (Figure 4.6).
Figure 4.5 a) Surface functionalization of CB7 particles with Ada-Rho. b) Fluorescence
microscopy images (exc = 546 nm) of CB7-functionalized particles (5 mg/mL) with surface-
bound Ada-Rho.
Page 86
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
74
550 600 650 700 7500
400
800
0 20 40 60
300
400
500F
luo
resce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
a)
Particles
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Volume (µL)
400 450 500 550 600
0.00
0.04
0.08
0 20 40 60
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Abso
rban
ce
Wavelength (nm)
b)Particles
Abso
rban
ce
Volume (µL)
Figure 4.6 Variation of a) fluorescence intensity (λexc = 520 nm, λobs = 580 nm) and b)
absorbance (λobs = 570 nm) of the supernatant (150 µL) of a mixture of 10 µM Ada-Rho and
varying amounts of CB7 particles (10 mg/mL) after centrifugation and dilution to 2000 µL in
10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
550 600 650 700 7500
200
400
0 20 40 60
0.8
1.0
1.2
a)
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
F0/F
Volume (µL)
400 500 600
0.00
0.01
0.02
0 20 40 60
0.8
1.0
1.2
b)
Abso
rban
ce
Wavelength (nm)
A0/A
Volume (µL)
Figure 4.7 Variation of a) fluorescence intensity (λexc = 520 nm, λobs = 580 nm) and b)
absorbance (λobs = 570 nm) of the supernatant (220 µL) of a mixture containing 1.7 µM Ada-
Rho and varying amounts of ATA-functionalized particles (10 mg/mL) after centrifugation and
dilution to 2000 µL in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
As in the case of AMADA (see above), the loading capacity of Ada-Rho could
be determined from the intersection between the linear decrease and the plateau region
of the titration plots, which revealed that the amount of Ada-Rho on the surface was
significantly lower (3.0 µmol/g) than the amount of CB7 (5.7 µmol/g). Such a
dependence of the surface coverage density on the size of the immobilized molecule is
common, and may be due to steric repulsion between molecules at adjacent binding sites,
a size-dependent diffusion through the grafted 3D PAA network, or a conformational
Page 87
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
75
rearrangement of the PAA chains in response to the presence of the hydrophobic dye,
which may block otherwise available binding sites.
500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
amount of
particles
during incubation
Flu
ore
scen
ce
Wavelength (nm)
a)
0 20 40 60 80
250
300
350
400
450
V = 52.9 µL
loading capacity = 2.84 µmol/g
Flu
ore
scen
ce
Volume (µL)
b)
Figure 4.8 Quantification of remaining CB7 binding sites on Ada-Rho-functionalized particle
surfaces. a) Fluorescence spectra of different samples. b) Dependence of fluorescence spectral
changes (exc = 450 nm, obs = 510 nm) of the supernatant on the volume of added functionalized
polymer particles stock solution (10 mg/mL) during incubation with 25 µM AMADA in 10 mM
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
0 20 40 60
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0 Ada-Rho only
Ada-Rho + 0.5 eq AMADA
A0/A
Volume (µL)
Figure 4.9 Extraction with CB7-functionalized beads using solutions of 0.44 µM Ada-Rho
(solid circles) or a mixture of 0.44 µM Ada-Rho and 0.22 µM AMADA (open circles). The
intersections refer to final Ada-Rho surface loadings of 3.0 µmol/g and 1.8 µmol/g,
respectively.
The latter explanation can be ruled out, because particles, in which all binding
sites were saturated with Ada-Rho could still extract additional 2.8 µmol/g AMADA
from solution (Figure 4.8) and the sum of Ada-Rho (3.0 µmol/g) and AMADA (2.8
µmol/g) was in excellent agreement with the CB7 surface coverage density determined
with AMADA only (5.7 µmol/g). In other words, approximately 50% of all available
Page 88
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
76
CB7 binding sites were occupied when the particles were incubated with Ada-Rho first,
and then, the remaining binding sites could be occupied in a second incubation step with
AMADA.70 A different result was, however, obtained, when the CB7-functionalized
particles were incubated with a mixture of both, Ada-Rho and AMADA. This reduced
the amount of Ada-Rho that can be extracted with a specific amount of particles (Figure
4.9), which is consistent with a competitive occupation of the CB7 binding sites by
AMADA, and suggests an elegant method to control the surface coverage density of
CB7-functionalized particles.
4.5 Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage
Densities
400 500 600
0.00
0.03
0.06
0 50 100
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Ab
so
rba
nce
Wavelength (nm)
Ada-Rho/AMADA
100 : 0
a)
Ab
so
rba
nce
Volume (µL)
2.95 µmol/g
Ada-Rho
400 500 600
0.00
0.03
0.06
0 50 100
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
Ada-Rho/AMADA
7.5 µM : 2.5 µM
Abso
rban
ce
Wavelength (nm)
b)
Abso
rban
ce
Volume (µL)
2.34 µmol/g
Ada-Rho
400 500 600
0.00
0.03
0.06
0 50 100
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
Abso
rban
ce
Wavelength (nm)
c)1.41 µmol/g
Ada-Rho
Ada-Rho/AMADA
5 µM : 5 µM
Abso
rban
ce
Volume (µL)
400 500 600
0.00
0.03
0.06
0 50 100
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
Ab
so
rba
nce
Wavelength (nm)
d)0.74 µmol/g
Ada-Rho
Ada-Rho/AMADA
25 : 75
Ab
so
rba
nce
Volume (µL)
Figure 4.10 Variation of absorbance (λobs = 570 nm) of the supernatant (370 µL) containing a
mixture of 2 nmol AMADA and Ada-Rho (molar fraction of Ada-Rho: a) 1.0, b) 0.75, c) 0.5,
and d) 0.25) incubated varying amounts of CB7 functionalized particles after centrifugation and
dilution to 2000 µL in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2. The insets show the dependence of
absorbance at λobs = 570 nm on the volume of added particle stock solution (7 mg/mL).
Page 89
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
77
In order to investigate in detail how the presence of AMADA during incubation with
Ada-Rho influences the resulting surface coverage densities, varying amounts of CB7
particles were incubated with mixtures containing different mole fractions of AMADA
and Ada-Rho. This indicated that the amount of particles, which are required to extract
Ada-Rho from solution, remained approximately the same despite varying total Ada-
Rho concentrations in the incubation solution (Figure 4.10). Consequently, the surface
coverage densities of Ada-Rho as determined by our extraction-based surface
quantification method de-pended linearly on the molar fraction of AMADA and Ada-
Rho over its entire range (Figure 4.11).
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00
0
1
2
3
Surf
ace
Ada
-Rho
(µ
mo
l/g
)
[AMADA]/([AMADA]+[Ada-Rho])
Figure 4.11 Dependence of resulting Ada-Rho surface coverage densities on the mole
fraction of the competitor AMADA in mixtures of AMADA and Ada-Rho (6 µM total
concentration).
It is noteworthy that such a simple linear relationship came as a surprise, because
first, the number of available binding sites is different for AMADA and Ada-Rho (see
above), and second, the resulting surface concentrations of two competitors should, in a
thermodynamically equilibrated mixture, also depend on their binding affinities.30, 70 We
conclude that the occupation of the CB7 binding cavities is diffusion-limited, which
leads to a kinetically controlled competitive occupation of the CB7 binding sites with
AMADA and Ada-Rho. In addition to the mechanistic insights, our results clearly
demonstrate that the surface coverage densities of application-relevant functional
molecules on CB7-functionalized particles can be precisely adjusted by using two
competitive cavity binders. This allowed us to prepare a series of particles with exactly
known Ada-Rho surface coverage densities in a straightforward manner, which could
then be analyzed by fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy (Figure 4.12 and 4.13).
Page 90
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
78
Therein, a linear increase in the fluorescence intensity was observed at low surface
coverage densities (up to ca. 1 µmol/g), whereas higher surface fluorophore coverage
densities did not lead to a further increase in fluorescence intensity.
550 600 650 700 7500
50
100
0 1 2 3
0.0
0.5
1.0
Flu
ore
scen
ce
Wavelength (nm)
surface
Ada-Rho
(II 0
)/(I
ma
xI 0
)
Surface Ada-Rho (µmol/g)
a)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
40
60
80
100
Mea
n F
luore
sce
nce
Surface Ada-Rho µmol/g
b)
Figure 4.12 a) Steady-state fluorescence spectra (exc = 520 nm) of Ada-Rho-labeled
particles (0.2 mg/mL) in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 with increasing surface coverage
densities of Ada-Rho (adjusted by using mixtures of Ada-Rho and AMADA, see Figure
4.10). The inset shows the dependence of the normalized fluorescence intensity (em =
585 nm) on the surface coverage densities. b) Dependence of the mean fluorescence
intensity within the regions of interest (ROIs) in fluorescence microscopy images (see
Figure 4.12). Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3).
This result is consistent with our previous observations with covalently bound
surface fluorophores and originates most likely from self-quenching due to an increased
probability of non-fluorescent aggregate formation at high surface coverage densities.6,
69 It is important to note that uncertainties arising from the covalent surface modification
protocol needed to be previously eliminated by control measurements with absolute
fluorometry involving an integrating sphere set-up,6 whereas in this report, we exploit
supramolecular host-guest chemistry to unambiguously determine and control the
fluorophore surface coverage densities. Another interesting consideration is that our
competition-based surface functionalization protocol applies an excess of two
competitors for a limited number of accessible binding cavities, which could lead to a
more homogeneous distribution of surface coverage densities within a particle
population than methods relying on substoichiometric amounts of reagent. The latter
require a very efficient mixing to prevent a local depletion during reagent addition to a
reaction mixture.
Page 91
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
79
Figure 4.13 Fluorescence microscopy images (546 nm bandpass filter) of Ada-Rho-labeled
particles (5 mg/mL) with increasing surface coverage densities of Ada-Rho (expressed as
loading capacities, LC). The white circles represent the automatically assigned ROIs by the
software ImageJ.
0 1 2
0
150
300100 mM AMADA
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Time (h)
no AMADA
50 mM AMADA
Figure 4.14 Time-dependent dissociation of Ada-Rho from CB7-functionalized particles in
presence of the competitor AMADA. Ada-Rho functionalized particles (2 mg/mL) were
incubated with 50 mM (open circles) or 100 mM (filled circles) AMADA in 10 mM
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 and the fluorescence of the supernatant (lexc = 520 nm, lobs = 585 nm) was
measured after certain time intervals. As control, the fluorescence of the supernatant did not
show any release of surface-bound Ada-Rho in absence of the competitor AMADA (filled
squares).
In contrast, when the particles were first surface-functionalized with Ada-Rho
and subsequently incubated with high concentrations of AMADA for a longer period, a
Page 92
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
80
slow dissociation of Ada-Rho from the surface was observed (Figure 4.14). This clearly
demonstrates the principal reversibility of the host-guest interaction despite the strong
affinity. Furthermore, it enables the determination of exchange kinetics on particles
surfaces and presents a complementary conceptual framework for kinetic studies of host-
guest systems.71, 72
4.6 Conclusions
In conclusion, we have introduced polymer particles surface-functionalized with the
supramolecular host molecule CB7. Therefore, we synthesized monofunctionalized CB7
bearing a propargyl group, which can be covalently bound to azide-functionalized
surfaces of polymer particles by click chemistry. The successful reaction and the
resulting number of CB7 molecules on the particle surface was reliably quantified and
the ease of subsequently introducing other molecular components was demonstrated
with the fluorescent dye Ada-Rho. Compared with covalent conjugation strategies,
simple mixing of the two components in water suffices and other additives such as
coupling reagents are not required. Overall, this provides a reliable host-guest-based
surface functionalization method in water with wide-ranging perspectives. We have
shown that it allows to precisely control surface coverage densities, which unfolds
numerous perspectives in varying areas. For example, it allows the investigation of
fluorescence quenching mechanisms on surfaces and validation of absolute
fluorometry,6, 69 the systematic testing of hitherto unverified, theoretical quantification
models for spherical substrates in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS),68 as well as
straightforward construction of multimodal probes for medical imaging,73 potentially for
clinical applications, which require regulatory clearance and thus metrological
traceability.67 Varying surface coverage densities can have a significant impact on the
efficiency of nanoparticle-based diagnostics and therapy.1-3, 74-77 We also demonstrated
the controllable release of surface-bound Ada-Rho by a stronger cavity binder. This
suggests the use of CB7-functionalized particles for the construction of stimuli-
responsive release systems.
4.7 References
(1) K. E. Sapsford, W. R. Algar, L. Berti, K. B. Gemmill, B. J. Casey, E. Oh, M. H. Stewart
and I. L. Medintz, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 1904-2074.
Page 93
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
81
(2) W. R. Algar, D. E. Prasuhn, M. H. Stewart, T. L. Jennings, J. B. Blanco-Canosa, P. E.
Dawson and I. L. Medintz, Bioconjugate Chem., 2011, 22, 825-858.
(3) I. Medintz, Nat. Mater., 2006, 5, 842-842.
(4) W. Liu, S. K. Samanta, B. D. Smith and L. Isaacs, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 2391-2403.
(5) C. M. Dundas, D. Demonte and S. Park, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2013, 97, 9343-
9353.
(6) A. Hennig, H. Borcherding, C. Jaeger, S. Hatami, C. Wurth, A. Hoffmann, K. Hoffmann,
T. Thiele, U. Schedler and U. Resch-Genger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 8268-8276.
(7) T. Skorjanc, F. Benyettou, J.-C. Olsen and A. Trabolsi, Chem. Eur. J., 2017, 23, 8333-8347.
(8) K. I. Assaf, A. Hennig, S. Peng, D.-S. Guo, D. Gabel and W. M. Nau, Chem. Commun.,
2017, 53, 4616-4619.
(9) V. Montes-García, J. Pérez-Juste, I. Pastoriza-Santos and L. M. Liz-Marzán, Chem. Eur.
J., 2014, 20, 10874-10883.
(10) H. Li, D.-X. Chen, Y.-L. Sun, Y. B. Zheng, L.-L. Tan, P. S. Weiss and Y.-W. Yang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 1570-1576.
(11) S. S. Agasti, M. Liong, C. Tassa, H. J. Chung, S. Y. Shaw, H. Lee and R. Weissleder,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 450-454.
(12) H. J. Kim, M. H. Lee, L. Mutihac, J. Vicens and J. S. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41,
1173-1190.
(13) Y. Yao, M. Xue, X. Chi, Y. Ma, J. He, Z. Abliz and F. Huang, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48,
6505-6507.
(14) R. de laRica, R. M. Fratila, A. Szarpak, J. Huskens and A. H. Velders, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2011, 50, 5704-5707.
(15) R. Freeman, T. Finder, L. Bahshi and I. Willner, Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 2073-2076.
(16) R. Klajn, M. A. Olson, P. J. Wesson, L. Fang, A. Coskun, A. Trabolsi, S. Soh, J. F. Stoddart
and B. A. Grzybowski, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 733-738.
(17) T. Jin, F. Fujii, E. Yamada, Y. Nodasaka and M. Kinjo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128,
9288-9289.
(18) A. Wei, Chem. Commun., 2006, 0, 1581-1591.
(19) A. Arduini, D. Demuru, A. Pochini and A. Secchi, Chem. Commun., 2005, 0, 645-647.
(20) T. Jin, F. Fujii, H. Sakata, M. Tamura and M. Kinjo, Chem. Commun., 2005, 0, 2829-2831.
(21) B. Kim, S. L. Tripp and A. Wei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 7955-7956.
(22) J. Liu, S. Mendoza, E. Román, M. J. Lynn, R. Xu and A. E. Kaifer, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1999, 121, 4304-4305.
Page 94
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
82
(23) M. J. Ludden, D. N. Reinhoudt and J. Huskens, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 1122-1134.
(24) J. Voskuhl and B. J. Ravoo, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 495-505.
(25) D. Sigwalt, M. Šekutor, L. Cao, P. Y. Zavalij, J. Hostaš, H. Ajani, P. Hobza, K. Mlinarić-
Majerski, R. Glaser and L. Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 3249-3258.
(26) L. Cao, M. Šekutor, P. Y. Zavalij, K. Mlinarić-Majerski, R. Glaser and L. Isaacs, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 988-993.
(27) S. Moghaddam, C. Yang, M. Rekharsky, Y. H. Ko, K. Kim, Y. Inoue and M. K. Gilson,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 3570-3581.
(28) M. V. Rekharsky, T. Mori, C. Yang, Y. H. Ko, N. Selvapalam, H. Kim, D. Sobransingh,
A. E. Kaifer, S. Liu, L. Isaacs, W. Chen, S. Moghaddam, M. K. Gilson, K. Kim and Y. Inoue,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 2007, 104, 20737-20742.
(29) W. S. Jeon, K. Moon, S. H. Park, H. Chun, Y. H. Ko, J. Y. Lee, E. S. Lee, S. Samal, N.
Selvapalam, M. V. Rekharsky, V. Sindelar, D. Sobransingh, Y. Inoue, A. E. Kaifer and K. Kim,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 12984-12989.
(30) S. Liu, C. Ruspic, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakrabarti, P. Y. Zavalij and L. Isaacs, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 15959-15967.
(31) D. Shetty, J. K. Khedkar, K. M. Park and K. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 8747-8761.
(32) M. Nilam, P. Gribbon, J. Reinshagen, K. Cordts, E. Schwedhelm, W. M. Nau and A.
Hennig, SLAS Discov., 2017, 22, 906-914.
(33) M. Schnurr, J. Sloniec-Myszk, J. Döpfert, L. Schröder and A. Hennig, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2015, 54, 13444-13447.
(34) G. Ghale, A. G. Lanctôt, H. T. Kreissl, M. H. Jacob, H. Weingart, M. Winterhalter and W.
M. Nau, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 2762-2765.
(35) R. N. Dsouza, A. Hennig and W. M. Nau, Chem. Eur. J., 2012, 18, 3444-3459.
(36) A. Hennig, H. Bakirci and W. M. Nau, Nat. Meth., 2007, 4, 629-632.
(37) P. Neirynck, J. Brinkmann, Q. An, D. W. J. van der Schaft, L.-G. Milroy, P. Jonkheijm
and L. Brunsveld, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 3679-3681.
(38) J. F. Young , H. D. Nguyen , L. Yang, J. Huskens, P. Jonkheijm and L. Brunsveld
ChemBioChem, 2010, 11, 180-183.
(39) I. Hwang, K. Baek, M. Jung, Y. Kim, K. M. Park, D.-W. Lee, N. Selvapalam and K. Kim,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 4170-4171.
(40) J. Murray, J. Sim, K. Oh, G. Sung, A. Lee, A. Shrinidhi, A. Thirunarayanan, D. Shetty and
K. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 2395-2398.
Page 95
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
83
(41) W. Li, A. T. Bockus, B. Vinciguerra, L. Isaacs and A. R. Urbach, Chem. Commun., 2016,
52, 8537-8540.
(42) D.-W. Lee, K. M. Park, M. Banerjee, S. H. Ha, T. Lee, K. Suh, S. Paul, H. Jung, J. Kim,
N. Selvapalam, S. H. Ryu and K. Kim, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3, 154-159.
(43) M. J. Webber, E. A. Appel, B. Vinciguerra, A. B. Cortinas, L. S. Thapa, S. Jhunjhunwala,
L. Isaacs, R. Langer and D. G. Anderson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 2016, 113, 14189-
14194.
(44) S. K. Samanta, J. Quigley, B. Vinciguerra, V. Briken and L. Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2017, 139, 9066-9074.
(45) K. L. Kim, G. Sung, J. Sim, J. Murray, M. Li, A. Lee, A. Shrinidhi, K. M. Park and K.
Kim, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 1712.
(46) J. F. Young, H. D. Nguyen, L. Yang, J. Huskens, P. Jonkheijm and L. Brunsveld,
ChemBioChem, 2010, 11, 180-183.
(47) P. Neirynck, J. Brinkmann, Q. An, D. W. van der Schaft, L.-G. Milroy, P. Jonkheijm and
L. Brunsveld, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 3679-3681.
(48) R. W. Taylor, T.-C. Lee, O. A. Scherman, R. Esteban, J. Aizpurua, F. M. Huang, J. J.
Baumberg and S. Mahajan, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 3878-3887.
(49) C.-A. Tao, Q. An, W. Zhu, H. Yang, W. Li, C. Lin, D. Xu and G. Li, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 9867-9869.
(50) T.-C. Lee and O. A. Scherman, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2438-2440.
(51) F. Benyettou, I. Milosevic, Y. Lalatonne, F. Warmont, R. Assah, J.-C. Olsen, M. Jouaid,
L. Motte, C. Platas-Iglesias and A. Trabolsi, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2013, 1, 5076-5082.
(52) F. Benyettou, K. Nchimi‐Nono, M. Jouiad, Y. Lalatonne, I. Milosevic, L. Motte, J. C.
Olsen, N. i. Saleh and A. Trabolsi, Chem. Eur. J., 2015, 21, 4607-4613.
(53) R. De La Rica and A. H. Velders, Small, 2011, 7, 66-69.
(54) I. Brouwer, G. Sitters, A. Candelli, S. J. Heerema, I. Heller, H. Zhang, D. Normanno, M.
Modesti, E. J. Peterman and G. J. Wuite, Nature, 2016, 535, 566-569.
(55) E. Mathiowitz, J. S. Jacob, Y. S. Jong and G. P. Carino, Nature, 1997, 386, 410.
(56) D. Zhang, G. Chen, D. Manwani, A. Mortha, C. Xu, J. J. Faith, R. D. Burk, Y. Kunisaki,
J.-E. Jang and C. Scheiermann, Nature, 2015, 525, 528-532.
(57) J. M. Baumes, J. J. Gassensmith, J. Giblin, J.-J. Lee, A. G. White, W. J. Culligan, W. M.
Leevy, M. Kuno and B. D. Smith, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 1025-1030.
(58) M. Pierobon, J. Wulfkuhle, L. Liotta and E. Petricoin, Oncogene, 2015, 34, 805-814.
Page 96
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
84
(59) Y. Lu, J. Lu, J. Zhao, J. Cusido, F. M. Raymo, J. Yuan, S. Yang, R. C. Leif, Y. Huo, J. A.
Piper, J. Paul Robinson, E. M. Goldys and D. Jin, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 3741.
(60) M. Liong, A. N. Hoang, J. Chung, N. Gural, C. B. Ford, C. Min, R. R. Shah, R. Ahmad,
M. Fernandez-Suarez, S. M. Fortune, M. Toner, H. Lee and R. Weissleder, Nat. Commun.,
2013, 4, 1752.
(61) D. Quesada-Gonzalez and A. Merkoci, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2015, 73, 47-63.
(62) Q. Y. Xie, Y. H. Wu, Q. R. Xiong, H. Y. Xu, Y. H. Xiong, K. Liu, Y. Jin and W. H. Lai,
Biosens. Bioelectron., 2014, 54, 262-5.
(63) H. Chen, Z. Huang, H. Wu, J. F. Xu and X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 129,
16802-16805.
(64) M. M. Ayhan, H. Karoui, M. Hardy, A. Rockenbauer, L. Charles, R. Rosas, K. Udachin,
P. Tordo, D. Bardelang and O. Ouari, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 10238-10245.
(65) A. Hennig, A. Hoffmann, H. Borcherding, T. Thiele, U. Schedler and U. Resch-Genger,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7842-7844.
(66) A. Hennig, A. Hoffmann, H. Borcherding, T. Thiele, U. Schedler and U. Resch-Genger,
Anal. Chem., 2011, 83, 4970-4974.
(67) A. Hennig, P. M. Dietrich, F. Hemmann, T. Thiele, H. Borcherding, A. Hoffmann, U.
Schedler, C. Jager, U. Resch-Genger and W. E. S. Unger, Analyst, 2015, 140, 1804-1808.
(68) P. M. Dietrich, A. Hennig, M. Holzweber, T. Thiele, H. Borcherding, A. Lippitz, U.
Schedler, U. Resch-Genger and W. E. S. Unger, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 20393-20404.
(69) A. Hennig, S. Hatami, M. Spieles and U. Resch-Genger, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2013,
12, 729-737.
(70) The reported binding constants for the cationic ammonium forms of 1-aminoadamantane
and 1-aminomethyladamantane are 1.7 1014 M-1 and 7.7 1014 M-1, respectively (ref. 27). As
a consequence of this strong affinity, the resulting host-guest complex with CB7 has also an
appreciable kinetic stability. Assuming a maximally diffusion-controlled association reaction
(kass = 7.4 109 M-1 s-1), the dissociation half-life times are >4.4 h and >20 h for 1-
aminoadamantane and 1-aminomethyladamantane.
(71) E. Masson, M. Raeisi and K. Kotturi, Isr. J. Chem., 2018, 58, 3-4.
(72) C. Bohne, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 4037-4050.
(73) S. Kim, G. Yun, S. Khan, J. Kim, J. Murray, Y. M. Lee, W. J. Kim, G. Lee, S. Kim, D.
Shetty, J. H. Kang, J. Y. Kim, K. M. Park and K. Kim, Mater. Horizons, 2017, 4, 450-455.
Page 97
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
85
(74) M. Colombo, L. Fiandra, G. Alessio, S. Mazzucchelli, M. Nebuloni, C. De Palma, K.
Kantner, B. Pelaz, R. Rotem, F. Corsi, W. J. Parak and D. Prosperi, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7,
13818.
(75) H. S. Choi, W. Liu, F. Liu, K. Nasr, P. Misra, M. G. Bawendi and J. V. Frangioni, Nat.
Nanotechnol., 2010, 5, 42-47.
(76) M. Howarth, W. Liu, S. Puthenveetil, Y. Zheng, L. F. Marshall, M. M. Schmidt, K. D.
Wittrup, M. G. Bawendi and A. Y. Ting, Nat. Meth., 2008, 5, 397-399.
(77) M. Howarth and A. Y. Ting, Nat. Protoc., 2008, 3, 534-545.
Page 98
Chapter 4 Precise Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities on Polymer Micro-
and Nanoparticles
86
Page 99
Summary and Outlook
87
Summary and Outlook
The thesis describes the synthetic procedure of clickable mono-functionalized cucurbit[n]urils
(n = 6, 7) and mainly on the exploration of new applications based on the mono-functionalized
CBn. we explore two applications based on mono-functionalized CB7.
One is to attach fluorescein on the outer rim of CB7, thus a host-guest FRET pair based
on the macrocyclic host CB7 labelled with carboxyfluorescein as acceptor and the nucleic stain
DAPI as donor and guest was designed. This supramolecular FRET pair is used for quantitative
sensing of DNA with an excellent linear dependence of the ratiometric fluorescence intensities.
Compared with commercial DNA staining dyes, the FRET pair with dual-wavelength can offer
more precise results. Such approach can be applied to quantify DNA accurately and potentially
be used in real-time PCR.
For the second application, mono-functionalized CB7 is introduced on the surface of
nano-/macro-particles. After that, incubation of CB7-functionalized particles with two high-
affinity guests, resulted in a simple linear relationship between surface coverage densities of
one fluorescent guest and the mole fraction of this guest in the incubation mixture. This suggests
a highly modular supramolecular strategy for the stable immobilization of application-relevant
molecules on particle surfaces and a precise control of their surface coverage densities.
For the future plan based on mono-functionalized CB7, I would like to suggest new
members in our group to synthesize CB7 derivatives attathed with organelle recognition
functional groups and apply this into cell culture. The other promising project is to connect two
CB7 toghther to dimerize guests and biomolecules, for example to form proteins dimer through
host-guest interactions.
Page 100
Summary and Outlook
88
Page 103
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
91
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
Materials and Methods
CB7 and CB7-OPr were synthesized according to literature procedures.1 DAPI (4′,6-diamidine-
2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride) and Type III salmon sperm DNA (ca. 2000 base pair)2 were
commercial samples (Sigma Aldrich) and used as received without further purification. 6-
FAM-azide was purchased from Baseclick and used as received. Reagents for synthesis were
from Fluka, Carl Roth, and Sigma-Aldrich. TLC was performed on SIL G/UV254 (Macherey-
Nagel). Buffers and salts were of the highest purity available from Fluka and Sigma-Aldrich
and used as received.
UV-Vis absorption measurements were performed with a Varian Cary 4000
spectrophotometer and the fluorescence spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary Eclipse
spectrofluorometer. All measurements were performed at ambient temperature, except for the
fluorescence-based DNA melting experiment, which was recorded in a temperature range from
20 to 90 °C with rectangular quartz cuvettes with 1-cm optical path length. The fluorescence
lifetimes were measured by time-correlated single-photon counting (FLS920, Edinburgh
Instruments Ltd.). For the lifetime measurements, DAPI and CB7-CF were excited at 373 nm
by using a diode laser (PicoQuant, LDH-P-C 375, fwhm ca. 50 ps) and the fluorescence was
followed at 470 nm. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Jeol ECS400 MHz and chemical shifts
(δ) are reported in ppm relative to TMS (δ = 0 ppm). Mass spectra were recorded on a Bruker
MALDI TOF spectrometer; HCCA (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) was used as a matrix.
Synthesis and Characterization of CB7-CF
8.7 mg (7.2 μmol) CB7-OPr was dissolved in 0.7 mL anhydrous DMSO and 6 mg (13 μmol)
6-FAM-azide was added. Then, 10 mg (50 μmol) sodium L-ascorbate was added into 2.8 mL
55% DMSO aqueous solution containing 4.47 mg (28 μmol) CuSO4 and 14.86 mg (28 μmol)
tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine (TBTA). These two solutions were mixed and stirred at room
temperature for 24 h. 50 mL diethyl ether was added, and the resulting precipitate was washed
three times with 25 mL MeOH. Drying under high vacuum afforded a dark solid. The crude
product containing unreacted CB7-OPr, 6-FAM-Azide, and CB7-CF, was purified by column
chromatography. In detail, the mixture was dissolved in 600 μL H2O/HCOOH 1:1 and loaded
onto silica gel 60 (0.04-0.063 mm) and the column was eluted with H2O/AcOH/HCOOH
10:10:1.5. The eluent was collected in fractions of 2 mL (50 fractions) and the fractions
containing pure CB7-CF were combined. Evaporation of the solvent gave 4 mg (2.4 μmol, 33%
Page 104
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
92
yield) CB7-CF as a brown solid. The product identity was confirmed by mass spectrometry
(Figure S2) and NMR (Figure S3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O with excess p-xylene diamine3),
(ppm) = 8.55 (H1), 8.44 (H2), 7.96 (H7), 7.75 (H6), 7.48 (H4), 7.46 (H3), 7.37 (H5, H10,
Hbfree), 6.58 (Hbbound), 5.73 (Hd), 5.52 (He), 4.79 (H11, HOD), 4.24 (H14, Hc), 4.00 (H13),
3.92 (Hafree), 3.49 (Habound), 1.90 (H12). MALDI-TOF MS calculated for [CB7-CF] 1675.43,
found 1675.67; calculated for [CB7-CFH++Na+] 1697.41, found 1697.63.
Fig. S1 Synthesis of CB7-CF.
Fig. S2 MALDI-TOF mass spectra of CB7-CF (HCCA matrix, positive mode).
Page 105
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
93
Fig. S3 1H NMR spectra of CB7-CF in D2O with excess p-xylene diamine (see ref. 2) to aid in
solubilization (magenta peak assignments).
Fig. S4 DFT-optimized structures (B3LYP/3-21G*) of different possible co-conformations for
the CB7-CF/DAPI complex (in gas phase). The distance (d) between the center of mass of the
CF and DAPI is given in Å. The structure shown in (a) was found to be more stable than that
in (b) by 4.9 kcal/mol.
Page 106
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
94
400 500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
I
(a)
[DAPI] 0 M
[DAPI] 0.04 M
[DAPI] 0.15 M
[DAPI] 0.38 M
[DAPI] 0.82 M
[DAPI] 1.55 M
[DAPI] 2.50 M
[DAPI] 3.76 M
[DAPI] 5.17 M
[DAPI] 6.36 M
[DAPI] 7.37 M
1 M CB7+ [DAPI]
/nm
400 450 500 550 600 650 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
I
(b)
1 M CB7-CF+20 M AMADA+[DAPI] [DAPI] 0 M
[DAPI] 0.04 M
[DAPI] 0.15 M
[DAPI] 0.38 M
[DAPI] 0.82 M
[DAPI] 1.55 M
[DAPI] 2.50 M
[DAPI] 3.76 M
[DAPI] 5.17 M
[DAPI] 6.36 M
[DAPI] 7.37 M
/nm
400 500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
I
[DAPI] 0 M
[DAPI] 0.04 M
[DAPI] 0.15 M
[DAPI] 0.38 M
[DAPI] 0.82 M
[DAPI] 1.55 M
[DAPI] 2.50 M
[DAPI] 3.76 M
[DAPI] 5.17 M
[DAPI] 6.36 M
[DAPI] 7.37 M
/nm
Only DAPI(c)
Fig. S5 Fluorescence titrations (ex = 360 nm) with increasing amounts of DAPI (0 to 7.4 µM)
in the presence of (a) 1 µM CB7, (b) 1 µM CB7-CF as well as 20 µM AMADA, and (c) only
DAPI. All experiments were performed in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
300 350 400 450 500 550 600
0
100
200
300
400
500
I
(a)
/nm
450 500 550 600 650
0
20
40
60
80
100
I
(b)
/nm
ex
/nm
340
345
352
355
360
365
370
380
Fig. S6 (a) Excitation spectrum (em = 520 nm) of 1 M CB7-CF in
10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2. (b) Emission spectra of 1 M CB7-CF at varying excitation
wavelengths.
Data Analysis
Binding constants were calculated from the fluorescence titrations (Fig. 3b, inset) by assuming
a 1:1 complex stoichiometry and performing a nonlinear fitting according to eq. S5. [G] and
[HG] are the concentrations of the uncomplexed guest and the host-guest complex, and [G]0
Page 107
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
95
and [H]0 are the total concentrations of guest and host. Ka is the association constant of the guest
with the host. a and b are constants depending on instrumental settings of the fluorometer.
At a suitable low concentration, the fluorescence intensity of a fluorophore has a linear
relationship with fluorophore concentration (eq. S1).
𝐼 = 𝑎[G] + 𝑏[HG] (S1)
Conservation of mass requires that:
[G]0 = [G] + [HG] (S2)
From eq. 1 and eq. S2 one obtains:
𝐼 = (𝑎 − 𝑏) ∙ [G] + 𝑏 ∙ [G]0 (S3)
According to the law of mass action, the concentration of host-guest complex under equilibrium
conditions is:
[G] =[G]0−[H]0−
1
𝐾𝑎
2+ √([H]0+[G]0+
1
𝐾𝑎)
2
4− [H]0[G]0 (S4)
Substitution of eq. S4 into eq. S3 affords eq. S5, which can be implemented into fitting
programs and which was used in the fitting in Figure 3b, inset, in the main text.
𝐼 = (a − b) ∙[G]0−[H]0−
1
𝐾𝑎
2+ √([H]0+[G]0+
1
𝐾𝑎)
2
4− [H]0[G]0 + b ∙ [G]0 (S5)
400 450 500 550 600 650 700
0
100
200
300
400
I
I
/nm
0 2 4 6 8 100
150
300
450
[CB7]/M
Ka = (2.8 0.2)
Fig. S7 Variation of the fluorescence spectrum (ex = 360 nm) of 1 μM DAPI in 10 mM
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2, upon addition of CB7. Inset: CB7 concentration dependence of the
fluorescence intensity at 470 nm, R2 = 0.998. The curve was fitted by 1:1 binding stoichiometry.
Page 108
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
96
400 500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
I
/nm
Fig. S8 Fluorescence spectra (ex = 360 nm) of 1 μM CB7-CF and 7.4 μM DAPI without (black
line) and with (red line) 32 μM AMADA in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2. The addition of
AMADA leads to a strong fluorescence decrease of CB7-CF.
0 10 20 30 40 500
1
2
3
4
DAPI+CB7-CF
DAPI+CB7
DAPI
IRF
Lo
g (
Co
un
ts)
t /ns
Fig. S9 Time-resolved fluorescence decay traces of 5 µM DAPI alone (blue) and in the
presence of 10 µM CB7-CF (black) and CB7 (red); instrument response function is
shown in magenta. exc = 373 nm, obs = 450 nm.
Table S1. Fitting results of lifetime decays of DAPI with and without CB7 or CB7-CF
in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 with 0.5% DMSO.
Sample τ/ns B Rel% χ2
DAPIa 1 = 0.29 0.056 81.1
2.24
2 = 2.77 0.001 18.9
DAPI 1 = 0.31 0.054 79.2
2.66
2 = 2.74 0.002 20.8
DAPI+CB7 1 = 1.59 0.026 100 2.40
DAPI+CB7-CF 1 = 0.65 0.021 30.2
1.94
2 = 3.05 0.010 69.8
a Without DMSO.
Page 109
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
97
400 500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
I
/nm
I450
/I520
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
[DNA]/(mgmL1)
Fig. S10 Fluorescence spectra (ex = 360 nm) of 0.5 M DAPI and 1 M CB7-CF with
increasing concentration of salmon sperm DNA (0 to 0.5 mg/mL). The inset shows the
corresponding change in the fluorescence intensity ratio at 450 nm and 520 nm.
400 500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
I
/nm
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50
250
500I
[DNA]/(mgmL1
)
Fig. S11 Variation of the fluorescence spectrum (ex = 360 nm) of 0.5 μM DAPI in 10 mM
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 upon addition of salmon sperm DNA. Inset: Dependence of the
fluorescence intensity at 450 nm on DNA concentration.
550 600 650 700
0
250
500
750
1000
I
/nm
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0
500
1000I
[DNA]/(mgmL1
)
Fig. S12 Variation of the fluorescence spectrum (ex = 497 nm) of 0.5 μM SYBR Green in
10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 upon addition of salmon sperm DNA. Inset: Dependence of the
fluorescence intensity at 520 nm on DNA concentration.
Page 110
Supporting Information for Chapter 3
98
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.5 M DAPI
0.5 M SYBR Green
0.5 M DAPI + 1 M CB7-CF
[DNA]/(mgmL1
)
I/I
Fig. S13 Normalized fluorescence intensity of DAPI, SYBR-Green, and DAPI/CB7-CF in
dependence on DNA concentration. Note that for DAPI/CB7-CF the ratiometric response is
shown (compare Figures S10-S12).
CF Labelling Degree Calculation
As the FRET efficiency is 99%, the DAPI fluorescence in Fig. 3a should not increase
upon addition of CB7-CF. However, there is a slight fluorescence increase by ca. 30%
at 460 nm of DAPI, attributed to complexation by unlabelled CB7. For comparison,
complexation of DAPI by unlabelled (parent) CB7 affords a fluorescence increase by a
factor of 12 (Fig. S8, at 460 nm). The ratio of these two factors (1.3 divided by 12) is
11%, which represents the degree of unlabelled CB7 corresponding to ca. 90% labelling
efficiency.
Limit of Detection
The limit of detection4 (LOD) of the FRET probe was determined according to eq. S6 from the
slope of the calibration curve, b, and the standard deviation of the y-intercept (inset in Fig. 4a)
of the calibration curve, Sa (with n 7). The molecular weight of salmon sperm DNA was taken
from the literature as 1.3 106 g/mol.2
LOD = 3𝑆a/𝑏 (S6)
References
(1) S. Zhang, Z. Domínguez, K. I. Assaf, M. Nilam, T. Thiele, U. Pischel, U. Schedler, W. M.
Nau and A. Hennig, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 8575-8581.
(2) K. Tanaka and Y. Okahata, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 10679-10683.
(3) Y. Yang, P. He, Y. Wang, H. Bai, S. Wang, J. F. Xu and X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2017, 129, 16457-16460.
(4) A. Shrivastava and V. B. Gupta, Chron. Young Sci., 2011, 2, 21.
Page 111
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
99
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
Materials and Methods
Reagents for synthesis were from Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich, or Acros Organics NV, Belgium.
Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) was from Molekula GmbH, Germany. Analytical thin layer
chromatography (TLC) was performed on SIL G/UV254 (Macherey-Nagel). Buffers and salts
were of the highest purity available from Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Methyl
methacrylate was destabilized with aluminum oxide (neutral for chromatography 50-200 µm,
60A) prior to use. Poly(styrene) nanoparticles (average diameter 110 nm) with surface
carboxylic acid groups were from Kisker Biotech GmbH & Co. KG (Steinfurt, Germany).
Cucurbit[7]uril (CB7) was synthesized according to established literature methods.1
Functionalization of microspheres was carried out in standard Eppendorf plastic tubes.
Concentrations of fluorescent dye stock solutions were determined using an extinction
coefficient of 90800 M1cm1 in acetonitrile/phosphate buffer for Ada-Rho.2
The photoreactions were carried out in a Luzchem LZC-4V photoreactor with 14 G8T5
lamps from SANKYO DENKI (six lamps from top and four lamps from each side) in a 250-
mL quartz glass round bottom flask. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Equinox 55 equipped
with an IRScope and ATR unit and are reported as wavenumbers in cm1 with band intensities
indicated as s (strong), m (medium), w (weak), and br (broad). 1H spectra were recorded on a
Jeol ECS400 MHz and chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm relative to TMS (δ = 0 ppm).
ESI-MS was performed on a Bruker HCT ultra and mass spectra are reported as mass-per-
charge ratio m/z (intensity in %, [assignment]). Absorbance measurements were performed
with a Varian Cary 4000 spectrophotometer. Fluorescence was measured with a Varian Cary
Eclipse spectrofluorometer equipped with a temperature controller. All spectroscopic
measurements were performed in 3.5 mL polymethacrylate fluorimeter cuvettes (Sigma-
Aldrich) or 3.5-mL quartz glass cuvettes (Hellma Analytics, Müllheim, Germany).
Fluorescence microscopy images were captured by an Axiovert 200 (Zeiss) with a filter (BP
546/12, LP 590) through an Evolution QEi Media Cybernetics camera by using a 40× objective,
and processed with the software ImageJ 1.48 V (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html).
Page 112
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
100
Abbreviations
AIBN: azobisisobutyronitrile; AMADA: 1-aminomethyladamantane; ATA: 11-azido-3,6,9-
trioxaundecan-1-amine; CB7: cucurbit[7]uril; EDC: 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)
carbodiimide hydrochloride salt; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide; EDTA:
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; ESI-MS: electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; FT-IR:
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; HR-MS: high resolution mass spectrometry; MES: 2-
(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid; m.p.: melting point; NMR: nuclear magnetic resonance
spectroscopy; IR: infrared; PAA: poly(acrylic acid); PMMA: poly(methyl methacrylate); rcf:
relative centrifugal force; r.t.: room temperature; SDS: sodium dodecyl sulfate; TBTA:
tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine; TLC: thin layer chromatography.
Page 113
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
101
Synthesis
Synthesis of CB-OH
1 g (0.86 mmol) CB7, synthesized as previously reported,1 was dissolved in 125 mL of a
mixture of Millipore water and 12 M HCl (3:2 v/v) and introduced in a 250-mL quartz glass
round bottom flask under nitrogen. 65 µL (0.62 mmol) 30% hydrogen peroxide in H2O was
added and the solution was vigorously stirred during irradiation of UV light (254 nm) for 48 h.
The reaction was monitored by 1H NMR by taking aliquots of the reaction mixture. The solvent
was then evaporated under reduced pressure affording a white solid. The crude product
containing a mixture of CB7-(OH)n (with n = 0, 1, 2, 3),3 was purified by column
chromatography. Therefore, the mixture was dissolved in 950 µL H2O/HCOOH 1:1 and loaded
onto silica gel 60 (0.04-0.063 mm) and the column was eluted with H2O/AcOH/HCOOH
10:10:1.5. The eluent was collected in fractions of 2 mL (>250 fractions) and the fractions
containing pure CB7-OH (as confirmed by TLC, see Fig. S2) were combined. Evaporation of
the solvent gave 150 mg CB7-OH as a white solid. The 1H NMR was in accordance with the
reported spectrum,4 and the identity and purity of the obtained material was additionally
confirmed by mass spectrometry (Fig. S1) and TLC (Fig. S2).
Page 114
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
102
Fig. S1 Mass spectrum of CB7-OH with 1 mM cystamine in Millipore water. Traces of CB6 were presumably
enriched during column chromatography (cf. Fig. S2).
Fig. S2 TLC of CBn mixture and CB7 derivatives.
Page 115
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
103
Synthesis of CB7-OPr
20 mg (17 µmol) CB7-OH was dissolved in 1.5 mL anhydrous DMSO. 10 mg (0.4 mmol) NaH
(95% purity as solid) was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h.
Subsequently, the mixture was cooled to 0 °C, 0.5 mL (4.4 mmol) propargyl bromide was
added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. 50 mL diethyl ether
was added, and the resulting precipitate was three times triturated with 25 mL MeOH. Drying
under high vacuum afforded a pale yellow solid, which was subjected a second time to the same
reaction conditions. This gave the desired CB7-OPr quantitatively as confirmed by mass
spectrometry (Fig. S3), 1H NMR (Fig. S4), and IR spectroscopy: MS (ESI, +ve): 685.3 (100,
[CB7-OPr+Cys+2H]2+ ). IR (KBr) cm1 806 (s), 968 (s), 1234 (s), 1322 (s), 1376 (s), 1473 (s),
1733 (s), 2120 (w), 2933 (m), 2998 (w), 3432 (s).5
Fig. S3 Mass spectrum of CB7-OPr with 1 mM cystamine in Millipore water.
Page 116
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
104
Fig. S4 1H NMR spectra of CB7-OPr in 1% DCl in D2O in absence (top) and presence of substoichiometric
amounts (middle) or excess (bottom) of the cavity binder p-xylene diamine (pXD).
Page 117
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
105
Synthesis of Ada-Rho
A mixture of 1-bromoadamantane (0.5 g, 2.32 mmol) and 1,4-diaminobutane (1.89 g, 11.62
mmol) was heated in a sealed tube at 190 °C for 20 h. Then, 2 M HCl (60 mL) and diethylether
(60 mL) were added, and the aqueous layer was separated and made alkaline with 50% aq.
NaOH (60 mL). The product was extracted with diethylether, the organic layer was dried over
anhydrous MgSO4, and after removal of the solvent, a pale yellow semi-solid was obtained
(0.26 g, 1.17 mmol, 50% yield). The product was used without further purification in the next
step. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) (ppm): 2.70 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.58 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H),
2.06 (s, 3H), 1.71-1.53 (m, 12H), 1.51-1.44 (m, 4H).
N-Adamantanyl-1,4-diaminobutane (15 mg, 0.067 mmol) and triethylamine (15 mg,
0.14 mmol) were dissolved in 1 mL dry tetrahydrofuran and the solution was stirred for
5 minutes. Afterwards, lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl chloride (38.9 mg, 0.067 mmol),
dissolved in 5 mL dry tetrahydrofuran, was added and the mixture was heated at 70 ºC in a
sealed tube for 72 hours. After that time, the solvent was removed and the crude was subjected
to purification by silica gel column chromatography, using dichloromethane/methanol (9/1) as
eluent. This procedure yielded the final product Ada-Rho as purple solid (18 mg, 0.024 mmol,
35% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO) δ (ppm): 8.52 (m, 1H, NH-adamantyl), 8.43 (d, J
= 1.9 Hz, 1H, CH-phenylsulfonate), 8.05 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, SO2NH), 7.96 (dd, J = 8.0 and 1.9
Hz, 1H, CH-phenylsulfonate), 7.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, CH-phenylsulfonate), 7.11-6.92 (m, 6H,
6 × CH-xanthylium), 3.64 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 8H, 4 × CH3CH2N), 2.92 (dt, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H,
SO2NHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH), 2.88-2.78 (m, 2H, SO2NHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH), 2.09 (s, 3H, 3
Page 118
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
106
× CH-adamantyl), 1.84 (s, 6H, 3 × CH2-adamantyl), 1.71-1.48 (m, 10H, 3 × CH2-adamantyl,
SO2NHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH), 1.21 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 12H, 4 × CH3CH2N) ppm; 13C NMR (101
MHz, (CD3)2SO) δ 157.3a, 157.1a, 155.0a, 147.9a, 141.6a, 133.0a, 132.6b, 130.7c, 126.6c, 125.7c,
113.7a, 113.4b, 95.4b, 56.1 (quart. C-adamantyl), 45.3 (4 × CH3CH2N), 42.0
(SO2NHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH), 38.5 (SO2NHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH), 37.5 (3 × CH2-adamantyl),
35.2 (3 × CH2-adamantyl), 28.4 (3 × CH-adamantyl), 26.3 (SO2NHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH), 23.5
(SO2NHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH), 12.5 (4 × CH3CH2N) ppm.
a quaternary C corresponding to xanthylium or phenylsulfonate skeleton; b CH corresponding
to xanthylium skeleton; c CH corresponding to phenylsulfonate skeleton
Position
1H NMR
(400 MHz,
DMSO-d6) δ
13C NMR
(101 MHz, DMSO-d6)
δ
Multiplicity,
integration
39 8.52 - (m, 1H)
17 8.43 126.6 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H)
34 8.05 - (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H)
19 7.96 125.7 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.9 Hz,
1H)
20 7.49 130.7 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H)
1, 3, 6, 11, 13, 14 7.11-6.92 95.4, 113.4, 132.6 (m, 6H) xanthylium
22, 23, 28, 29 3.64 45.3 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 8H)
35 2.92 42.0 (dt, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H)
38 2.88-2.78 38.5 (m, 2H)
42, 44, 48 2.09 28.4 (s, 3H)
41, 45, 49 1.84 37.5 (s, 6H)
36, 37 1.71-1.48 26.3, 23.5 (m, 4H)
43, 46, 47 1.71-1.48 35.2 (m, 6H)
24, 25, 30, 31 1.21 12.5 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 12H)
Page 119
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
107
2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12,
15, 16, 18 -
113.7, 133.0, 141.6,
147.9, 155.0, 157.1,
157.3
quart. carbons
xanthylium
and phenylsulfonate
40 - 56.1 quart. C adamantyl
Fig. S5 1H NMR spectrum of Ada-Rho in (CD3)2SO.
Page 120
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
108
Fig. S6 13C NMR spectrum of Ada-Rho in (CD3)2SO.
Preparation and Characterization of CB7-Functionalized
Particles
Synthesis of PMMA/PAA Microparticles
PMMA microparticles: Poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) polymer microbeads were
prepared by dispersion polymerization.6,7 In order to obtain a narrow size distribution, a custom-
made modified reaction chamber was employed to control the polymerization temperature and
the stirring speed of the sealed polymerization flasks. The bead size can be controlled by
parameters like monomer, stabilizer, and radical initiator concentration as well as reaction
temperature. A typical procedure for bead preparation is given in the following: 7 g
poly(vinylpyrrolidine) K90 (average molecular weight 1.300.000) and 600 mg (1.35 mmol)
sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (aerosol-OT) were dissolved in 170 ml methanol. The
mixture was transferred to the reaction flask containing 15 ml (14.1 g, 141 mmol), destabilized
methyl methacrylate, and 200 mg (1.2 mmol) azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN). The sealed flask
was placed in the reaction chamber, where the polymerization was performed at a stirring speed
of 20 rpm at a temperature of 55 °C for 21 hours. After cooling down to room temperature, the
resulting bead suspension was poured into 600 ml water to precipitate the PMMA beads. After
decantation of the water, the beads were washed several times with water and removed from
Page 121
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
109
the solution by centrifugation in 50 ml Falcon tubes. These washing-centrifugation cycles were
repeated until no more methyl methacrylate could be detected in the supernatant.
Bead functionalization:8 300 ml of a 0.17 % (w/v) suspension of 2.55 µm PMMA particles
were mixed with 9 g (125 mmol) acrylic acid, 150 mg (0.52 mmol) sodium dodecylsulfate
(SDS), and 1.50 ml of 0.15 M benzophenone as photoinitiator in methanol. After 5 min
equilibration time, the suspension was exposed for 8 min to UV light with 20 mW/cm2 intensity,
while the suspension was vigorously stirred. After irradiation, the suspension was centrifuged
and washed several times with distilled water to remove unreacted compounds, additives, and
homopolymer. Absence of PAA in solution was confirmed by conductometry (conductance <10
μS/cm).
Azide-Functionalized Particles
ATA-functionalized PMMA microparticles: 10 mg PMMA microparticles (111 µmol/g
COOH) were washed into 660 μL reaction buffer (0.1 M MES, pH 5.0 or 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4,
pH 7.2) by repeated centrifugation, supernatant removal and resuspension cycles.
Subsequently, 60 μL of 40 mM 11-azido-3,6,9-trioxaundecan-1-amine (ATA) in reaction buffer
were added. The reaction was started by adding 80 μL of 100 mg/mL (0.52 M) EDC
hydrochloride freshly dissolved in 4 °C cold water. Total reaction volume was 800 μL, final
conditions were 12.5 mg/mL microparticles (corresponding to 1.11 μmol COOH groups), 2.4
μmol ATA, and 42 μmol EDC. After 3 h or 6 h reaction time, the particles were washed into 1
mL 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 to afford a 10 mg/mL stock solution of ATA-functionalized
particles.
ATA-functionalized PS nanoparticles: 10 mg commercially available PS nanoparticles were
washed into 660 μL reaction buffer (0.1 M MES, pH 5.0) and 18 μL of 400 mM 11-azido-3,6,9-
trioxaundecan-1-amine (ATA) in reaction buffer were added. The reaction was started by
adding 74 μL of 1 g/mL (5.2 M) EDC hydrochloride freshly dissolved in 4 °C cold water. Total
reaction volume was 800 μL, final conditions were 12.5 mg/mL nanoparticles, 7.2 μmol ATA,
and 389 μmol EDC. After 3 h reaction time, the particles were washed into 1
mL 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 (by 10x centrifugation at 28600 rcf for 40 min) to afford a
10 mg/mL stock solution of ATA-functionalized particles.
Page 122
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
110
Fig. S7 Optical microscopy images (at 40fold magnification) of a) PMMA-PAA and b) ATA-functionalized
microparticles.
Page 123
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
111
CB7-Functionalized Particles
32 µL of a 3 mM CB7-OPr stock solution in DMSO was added to 400 µL ATA-functionalized
particles (10 mg/mL) in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 buffer, and 10 µL of a freshly prepared
20 mM sodium ascorbate solution in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 was mixed with 20 µL of a
10 mM Cu2+/tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine (TBTA) in 55% DMSO stock solution. Both
solutions were combined and the resulting reaction mixture was shaken for 24 h. The solution
was then centrifuged (3.5 min, 16000 rcf) and the supernatant was discarded after
centrifugation. The particles were thoroughly washed (20 times) with 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH
7.2 or 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.2 (which gave identical results), and the total
buffer volume was finally adjusted to afford a particle concentration of 10 mg/mL.
Nanoparticles were prepared in the same way except for centrifugation at 28600 rcf for 40 min.
4000 3000 2000 1000
0
20
40
60
80
C C
Tra
nsm
itta
nce (
%)
Wavenumbers (cm1
)
azide particles
CB7 particles
azide particles + CB7-OPr
(a)
2200 2100 2000
83.2
83.4
85.0
85.2
85.4(b)
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
(%
)
Wavenumbers (cm1
)
azide particles
CB7 particles
azide
Fig. S8 (a) IR spectra (KBr pellet) of ATA-functionalized particles before (black) and after (red) click reaction
with CB7-OPr, and a mixture of ATA-functionalized particles and CB7-OPr (blue). (b) IR spectra of ATA-
functionalized particles before (black) and after (red) click reaction with CB7-OPr in a narrow range.
Page 124
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
112
Surface Quantification Methods
Quantification of Surface-Bound CB7 with AMADA
For quantification of surface-bound CB7, aliquots from the as prepared CB7-functionalized
particle stock solution (10 mg/mL) were diluted with 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 to afford a
final volume of 475 µL, to which 25 µL 60 µM AMADA was added (final AMADA
concentration 3 µM). The mixture was briefly vortexed, sonicated, and then shaken for 5 min.
After centrifugation for 10 min at 16000 rcf, 400 μL of the supernatant was transferred to a new
Eppendorf tube and centrifugation was repeated. 350 µL of the final supernatant were
transferred into a 3-mL poly(methylmethacrylate) cuvette containing 1290 µL
10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2, and 160 μL 10 μM CB7 and 200 μL 10 μM acridine orange were
added. The final volume was 2000 µL and final concentrations were 0.8 µM CB7, 1 µM AO,
and 0-0.525 µM AMADA (depending on the amount of AMADA extracted).
Then, a fluorescence spectrum was recorded (λexc = 450 nm) and the fluorescence intensities
at λem = 520 nm were plotted against the volume of particle stock solution and normalized to
the fluorescence intensity in absence of particles (V = 0 µL). Linear fitting of the initial linear
increase of the titration plot gave the slope of the fitted line, a, and the y-intercept, b (see, for
example, inset of Fig. 2b in the main manuscript).
Assuming quantitative binding between AMADA and CB7 on the particle surface, the
loading capacity of the particles, i.e. the amount of CB7 per particle mass, can be obtained from
the intersection of the fitted line and the final plateau value in the titration plot, y∞, indicating
that all extraction of the molecule by the CB7-functionalized particles is complete. The volume
of particle stock solution needed to completely extract the molecule, x, is thus:
𝑥 =𝑦∞−𝑏
𝑎 [EQ1]
The mass of particles needed to completely extract the molecule, m, is then obtained by the
mass concentration of particle stock solution, ρParticle:
𝑚 =𝜌Particle (𝑦∞−𝑏)
𝑎 [EQ2]
This gives the loading capacity of the particles as the mass of particles needed to extract a
specific amount of molecules, n = c·V, as
Loading capacity (in μmol
gof particles) =
𝑎∙𝑐∙𝑉
𝜌Particle∙(𝑦∞−𝑏) [EQ3]
where a is slope and b the y-intercept of the fitted line, y∞ is the final plateau value in the
titration plot, c·V is the amount of the molecule to be extracted (e.g., 25 µL of 60 µM AMADA
stock solution or 500 µL of 3 µM during incubation), and ρParticle is the mass concentration of
Page 125
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
113
particle stock solution (here: 10 mg/mL). The reproducibility of the method was evaluated by
repeated measurements with a randomly selected batch of CB7-functionalized particles (Table
S1).
Quantification of Surface-Bound Ada-Rho
Varying volumes of the CB7-functionalized particles (10 mg/mL) were transferred into 1.5 mL
Eppendorf tubes and 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 was added to achieve a total volume of 80
µL. Then, 100 µL of 20 µM Ada-Rho was added and the mixture was incubated for 17 min.
After addition of 20 µL Triton X-100 to prevent unspecific absorption of Ada-Rho (sodium
dodecylsulfate performed equally well), the mixture was briefly vortexed and then centrifuged
for 27 min at 16000 rcf. Afterwards, 150 µL of the supernatant was diluted into 1850 µL 10
mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 and absorption and fluorescence spectra were recorded.
The fluorescence intensities at λem = 580 nm and the absorbance values at λ = 570 nm were
plotted against the volume of particle stock solution (Fig. S10), and linear fitting of the initial
linear decrease of the titration plot gave the slope of the fitted line, a, and the y-intercept, b.
The loading capacity of the particles, i.e. the mass of particles needed to extract a specific
amount of Ada-Rho, was calculated similarly as above (see EQ3) by additionally considering
the amount of unspecifically absorbed Ada-Rho, nunspecific:
Loading capacity (in μmol
gof particles) =
𝑎∙(𝑐∙𝑉−𝑛unspecific)
𝜌Particle∙(𝑦∞−𝑏) [EQ4]
As controls, AMADA-blocked CB7-functionalized particles were prepared by incubation of
100 µL 10 mg/mL CB7-functionalized particles and 1 mL 10 µM AMADA in 10 mM
(NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 for 17 min and subsequent centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in
10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 and then subjected to the procedure above to test whether Ada-
Rho could still bind to the particles (Fig. S12).
Unoccupied binding sites on the Ada-Rho and CB7-functionalized were quantified by the
AMADA-based method (Fig. S13, see Section 5.1 for experimental procedure).
Page 126
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
114
Supramolecular Control of Surface Coverage Densities
In order to prepare particles with different surface coverage densities of Ada-Rho, varying
volumes of CB7 functionalized particles (7 mg/mL) were transferred into 1.5 mL Eppendorf
tubes and 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 was added to achieve a total volume of 140 µL. Then,
200 µL of a solution containing Ada-Rho and AMADA (10 µM total concentration) was added
and the mixture was incubated for 17 min. After addition of 100 µL 1% SDS, the mixture was
briefly vortexed and then centrifuged for 27 min at 16000 rcf. Afterwards, 370 µL of the
supernatant was diluted into 1630 µL 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 and absorption spectra were
recorded.
The absorbance values at λ = 570 nm were plotted against the volume of particle stock
solution (Fig. S15), and linear fitting of the initial linear decrease of the titration plot gave the
slope of the fitted line, a, and the y-intercept, b. The surface coverage density with Ada-Rho
was then calculated using EQ4, in which c is the concentration of Ada-Rho only. The
dependence of the resulting surface coverage density on the molar fraction of AMADA is
shown in Fig. 4 in the main text.
Particles for fluorescence microscopy were then prepared by incubating 40 µL of 10 mg/mL
CB7 functionalized particles with 200 µL of a solution containing Ada-Rho and AMADA (10
µM total concentration) for 17 min, addition of 100 µL 1% SDS and centrifugation for 27 min.
The particles were finally washed with 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 and the particle
concentration was adjusted to 5 mg/mL. The fluorescence of the particle suspensions was
determined by fluorescence spectroscopy (Fig. 5a in the main text) and by fluorescence
microscopy (Fig. 5b and Fig. S16). For the latter, 5 µL of the particle suspension were deposited
in the center of a Thermo SCIENTIFIC 76 26 mm clear-white glass slide and a 22 22 mm
ROTH #1 cover glass was placed on the particle suspension to ensure that particles distribute
homogeneously between glass slide and cover glass. The images were captured with a Zeiss
Axiovert 200 and an Evolution QEi Media Cybernetics imaging camera through a 40× objective
using a BP 546/12, LP 590 filter set. The dependence of the fluorescence intensities within the
field of view on the surface coverage densities with Ada-Rho (Fig. 5b) was obtained by
automatic assignment of the regions of interest (ROIs) and averaging the intensity within all
ROIs with the software ImageJ 1.48 V (Fig. S16). The brightness and contrast of the image in
the main manuscript (Fig. 3b) was enhanced. The images in the SI (Fig. S16) are unedited.
Page 127
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
115
Supporting Figures and Tables
Supporting Tables S1 and S2
Table S1. Reproducibility measurements for the quantification of surface-bound CB7.
Experiment loading capacity
(µmol/g)
coupling yield
(%)
CB7 surface density
(nmol/cm2)
1 5.66 5.10 0.286
2 5.81 5.23 0.294
3 5.52 4.97 0.279
4 5.88 5.30 0.297
5 5.63 5.07 0.285
6 5.74 5.17 0.290
7 5.80 5.23 0.293
average 5.72 5.15 0.289
standard deviation 0.11 0.10 0.006
coefficient of variation ca. 2%
Table S2. Reaction results for CB7 surface functionalization.a
entry # reaction conditionsb loading capacity
(µmol/g)
coupling yield
(%)c
CB7 surface density
(nmol/cm2)
1 1) 3 h at pH 5.0, 2) 24 h (with EDTA)d 5.69 ± 0.04 5.13 ± 0.03 0.288 ± 0.002
2 1) 3 h at pH 5.0, 2) 24 h (without EDTA) 5.67 5.11 0.287
3 1) 3 h at pH 5.0, 2) 48 h 6.2 5.6 0.32
4 1) 3 h at pH 7.2, 2) 24 h 4.4 4.0 0.22
5 1) 6 h at pH 7.2, 2) 24 h 4.8 4.3 0.24
a Values were determined with the AMADA assay (Section 5.1). b Functionalization of COOH surface groups with
1) azide groups was performed in pH 5.0 or pH 7.2 buffer for 3 h or 6 h and then with 2) CB7-OPr in a click
reaction for 24 h or 48 h (see Section 4.1 and 4.2 for details). c With respect to 111 µmol/g surface COOH. d From
three replicates.
Page 128
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
116
Supporting Figures S9 to S19
500 550 600 650 7000
50
100
150
200
250
0 1 20.2
0.6
1.0
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
AMADA
F/F
0
[AMADA] (µM)
Fig. S9 Competitive fluorescence titration (λexc = 450 nm) of 2 µM AO and 1.1 µM CB7 in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4,
pH 7.2. The inset shows the corresponding fluorescence titration (λem =510 nm) plot normalized to the initial
fluorescence intensity and demonstrates quantitative 1:1 binding between AMADA and CB7 in solution.
500 600 700
0
100
200
300
0 30 60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
amount
of particles
during incubation
F/F
0
Volume (µL)
Fig. S10 Dependence of fluorescence spectral changes (exc = 450 nm, obs = 510 nm) of the supernatant on the
volume of added CB7-functionalized polymer particles stock solution (10 mg/mL) during incubation with
(dimethylaminomethyl)ferrocene (surface coverage density = 5.5 µmol/g). The inset compares CB7-functionalized
(filled circles) and ATA-functionalized particles as control (open circles).
Page 129
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
117
500 600 700
0
200
400
600F
luore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
a)
increasing amount
of nanoparticles
0 50 100 150
150
300
450
600
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Volume (µL)
b)
Fig. S11 a) Dependence of fluorescence spectral changes (exc = 450 nm, obs = 510 nm) of the supernatant on the
volume of added CB7-functionalized (poly)styrene nanoparticles stock solution (10 mg/mL) during incubation
with 4.56 µM AMADA. b) Respective titration plot.
550 600 650 700 7500
400
800
0 20 40 60
300
400
500
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
a)
Particles
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Volume (µL)
400 450 500 550 600
0.00
0.04
0.08
0 20 40 60
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Absorb
an
ce
Wavelength (nm)
b)
Particles
Ab
so
rba
nce
Volume (µL)
Fig. S12 Variation of a) fluorescence intensity (λexc = 520 nm, λobs = 580 nm) and b) absorbance (λobs = 570 nm)
of the supernatant (150 µL) of a mixture of 10 µM Ada-Rho and varying amounts of CB7 particles (10 mg/mL)
after centrifugation and dilution to 2000 µL in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
550 600 650 700 7500
200
400
0 20 40 60
0.8
1.0
1.2
a)
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
F0/F
Volume (µL)
400 500 6000.00
0.01
0.02
0 20 40 60
0.8
1.0
1.2
b)
Absorb
an
ce
Wavelength (nm)
A0/A
Volume (µL)
Fig. S13 Variation of a) fluorescence intensity (λexc = 520 nm, λobs = 580 nm) and b) absorbance (λobs = 570 nm)
of the supernatant (220 µL) of a mixture containing 1.7 µM Ada-Rho and varying amounts of ATA-functionalized
particles (10 mg/mL) after centrifugation and dilution to 2000 µL in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
Page 130
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
118
550 600 650 700 750
0
40
80
120
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
a)
0 10 20 30 40 500.0
0.5
1.0
b)
F/F
0
Volume (µL)
Fig. S14 Incubation of Ada-Rho with AMADA-blocked CB7-functionalized particles. a) Fluorescence spectra of
different samples. b) Dependence of fluorescence spectral changes (exc = 520 nm, obs = 570 nm) of the
supernatant on the volume of added AMADA-blocked CB7 functionalized polymer particles stock solution (10
mg/mL) during incubation with 2.5 µM Ada-Rho in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
500 600 700
0
100
200
300
400
500
amount of
particles
during incubation
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Wavelength (nm)
a)
0 20 40 60 80
250
300
350
400
450
V = 52.9 µL
loading capacity = 2.84 µmol/g
F
luo
resce
nce
Volume (µL)
b)
Fig. S15 Quantification of remaining CB7 binding sites on Ada-Rho-functionalized particle surfaces. a)
Fluorescence spectra of different samples. b) Dependence of fluorescence spectral changes (exc = 450 nm, obs =
510 nm) of the supernatant on the volume of added functionalized polymer particles stock solution (10 mg/mL)
during incubation with 25 µM AMADA in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2.
0 20 40 60
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Ada-Rho only
Ada-Rho + 0.5 eq AMADA
A0/A
Volume (µL)
Fig. S16 Extraction with CB7-functionalized beads using solutions of 0.44 µM Ada-Rho (solid circles) or a
mixture of 0.44 µM Ada-Rho and 0.22 µM AMADA (open circles). The intersections refer to final Ada-Rho
surface loadings of 3.0 µmol/g and 1.8 µmol/g, respectively.
Page 131
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
119
400 500 600
0.00
0.03
0.06
0 50 100
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06A
bsorb
an
ce
Wavelength (nm)
a)
Ada-Rho/AMADA
100 : 0
Ab
so
rba
nce
Volume (µL)
2.95 µmol/g
Ada-Rho
400 500 600
0.00
0.03
0.06
0 50 100
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
Ada-Rho/AMADA
75 : 25
Absorb
an
ce
Wavelength (nm)
b)
Ab
so
rba
nce
Volume (µL)
2.34 µmol/g
Ada-Rho
400 500 600
0.00
0.03
0.06
0 50 100
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
Absorb
an
ce
Wavelength (nm)
c)
1.41 µmol/g
Ada-Rho
Ada-Rho/AMADA
50 : 50
Ab
so
rba
nce
Volume (µL)
400 500 600
0.00
0.03
0.06
0 50 100
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
Absorb
an
ce
Wavelength (nm)
d)
0.74 µmol/g
Ada-Rho
Ada-Rho/AMADA
25 : 75
Ab
so
rba
nce
Volume (µL)
Fig. S17 Variation of absorbance (λobs = 570 nm) of the supernatant (370 µL) containing a mixture of 2 nmol
AMADA and Ada-Rho (molar fraction of Ada-Rho: a) 1.0, b) 0.75, c) 0.5, and d) 0.25) incubated varying amounts
of CB7 functionalized particles after centrifugation and dilution to 2000 µL in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2. The
insets show the dependence of absorbance at λobs = 570 nm on the volume of added particle stock solution (7
mg/mL).
Page 132
Supporting Information for Chapter 4
120
Fig. S18 Fluorescence microscopy images (546 nm bandpass filter) of Ada-Rho-labeled particles (5 mg/mL) with
increasing surface coverage densities of Ada-Rho (expressed as loading capacities, LC). The white circles
represent the automatically assigned ROIs by the software ImageJ.
0 1 2
0
150
300100 mM AMADA
Flu
ore
sce
nce
Time (h)
no AMADA
50 mM AMADA
Fig. S19 Time-dependent dissociation of Ada-Rho from CB7-functionalized particles in presence of the competitor
AMADA. Ada-Rho functionalized particles (2 mg/mL) were incubated with 50 mM (open circles) or 100 mM
(filled circles) AMADA in 10 mM (NH4)2HPO4, pH 7.2 and the fluorescence of the supernatant (exc = 520 nm,
obs = 585 nm) was measured after certain time intervals. As control, the fluorescence of the supernatant did not
show any release of surface-bound Ada-Rho in absence of the competitor AMADA (filled squares).
References
(1) Márquez, C.; Fang, H.; Nau, W. M. IEEE Trans. NanoBiosci. 2004, 3, 39-45.
(2) Wang, T.; Riegger, A.; Lamla, M.; Wiese, S.; Oeckl, P.; Otto, M.; Wu, Y.; Fischer, S.;
Barth, H.; Kuan, S. L.; Weil, T. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3234-3239.
(3) Ayhan, M. M.; Karoui, H.; Hardy, M.; Rockenbauer, A.; Charles, L.; Rosas, R.; Udachin,
K.; Tordo, P.; Bardelang, D.; Ouari, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2060-2060.
(4) Ayhan, M. M.; Karoui, H.; Hardy, M.; Rockenbauer, A.; Charles, L.; Rosas, R.; Udachin,
K.; Tordo, P.; Bardelang, D.; Ouari, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10238-10245.
(5) Chen, H.; Huang, Z.; Wu, H.; Xu, J. F.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem, Int. Ed. 2017, 129,
16802-16805.
(6) Shen, S.; Sudol, E. D.; El-Aasser, M. S. J. Polym. Sci. A 1994, 32, 1087-1100.
(7) Kim, J.-W.; Cho, S.-A.; Kang, H.-H.; Han, S.-H.; Chang, I.-S.; Lee, O.-S.; Suh, K.-D.
Langmuir 2001, 17, 5435-5439.
(8) Hennig, A.; Borcherding, H.; Jaeger, C.; Hatami, S.; Würth, C.; Hoffmann, A.; Hoffmann,
K.; Thiele, T.; Schedler, U.; Resch-Genger, U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8268-8276.
Page 133
CV
121
Curriculum Vitae
Page 135
CV
123
CURRICULUM VITAE
Shuai Zhang
Birthdate: 02/01/1990 (date/month/year)
Nationality: Chinese
Address: Campus Ring 1
28759, Bremen, Germany
Tel: (+49) 15905389536
E-mail: [email protected]
Education
Sept 2015-Jul. 2019 Doctoral study at Jacobs University Bremen (Germany)
Oct 2014-Jan. 2015 Visiting Master of Jacobs University Bremen (Germany)
Sept 2012-Jun. 2015 Master of Science at China University of Petroleum (East China)
Sept 2008-Jun. 2012 Bachelor of Science at China University of Petroleum (East China)
Visits and Conferences
Feb 2019 2019SupraChem, Würzburg, Germany
Jun 2016 5th ICCB, Brno, Czech Republic
Oct 2014 Visiting master (DAAD scholarship) in Jacobs University Bremen, Germany
July 2013 Presentation, CB&B Summer Workshop, Qingdao, China
Nov 2011 17th International Biophysics Congress, Beijing, China
Internship
July 2010 Internship in Sinopec Qilu Petrochemical Company Ltd
Aug 2008 Internship in Guangda Property Company in Dongguan
Scholarships and Honors
2015-2019 CSC (China Scholarship Council) Scholarship
Oct 2014 DAAD Short-Term Scholarship
2013-2015 The Second Prize Scholarship
Oct 2011 The Third Prize in the national competition 12th National College
Challenge Cup Contest (Group Leader)
2009-2012 Scholarship for Excellent Students
Page 136
CV
124
Articles
Chem. Comm., 2019, 55, 671-674 First-author
Materials, 2019, 12, 349 Co-author
Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 8575-8581 First-author
Process Biochem., 2018, 76, 111-117 Co-author
Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 2098 -2101 Co-author
Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 11790 -11793 Co-author
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 17799-17806 Co-author
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 17483 -17494 Co-author
J. Phys.Chem. B, 2015, 119: 33-43 Co-author
Biotechnol. Lett., 2013, 35: 689-693 Co-author
Languages
Chinese: Mother language; English: fluent; German: A2 level
Hobbies
Photography, Mountaineering, Traveling, Badminton, Jogging