Top Banner
SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015
26

SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

Jan 19, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

SYNTAX 5NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35

Brain & Language

LING 4110-4890-5110-7960

NSCI 4110-4891-6110

Fall 2015

Page 2: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

2

Course organization• Schedule:

• http://www.tulane.edu/~howard/BrLg/t1-Intro.html#schedule-of-topics

• Today's chapter:• http://www.tulane.edu/~howard/BrLg/t19-aIFG.html

• Fun with https://www.facebook.com/BrLg15/• Quiz before Thanksgiving will be in class & on

Blackboard.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 3: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

3

GradesQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7

MIN 6 5 5 4 7 3 4

AVG 9.0 8.8 8.8 8.4 9.2 7.5 8.7

MAX 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 4: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

4

COMBINATORIAL NET 2

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 5: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

5

The lexical interface

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 6: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

6

Models of sentence processing

Traditional generative model

• A separate mental module parses sentences just like we just did.

• Lexical access happens first.• Then one syntactic

hypothesis is considered at a time.

• There is no influence of meaning.

More recent interactive model

• There is no separate module for parsing

• Lexical access, syntactic structure assignment, and meaning assignment happen at the same time (in parallel).

• Several syntactic hypotheses can be considered at a time.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

How to decide?On-line processing

Page 7: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

7

Two types of processing

on-line

• Happens in real time.• Instructions for an

experiment to test it:• You will read a sentence,

one word at a time. • Push a key after each word.

off-line

• Happens after the fact.• Instructions for an

experiment to test it:• You will read a sentence.• Point to the picture that

describes it best.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 8: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

8

Working memory & syntax

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

• Left-to-right solution of arithmetic• 1 + 1 + 1 = ?• (1 + 1) + 1 = ?• 2 + 1 = 3

• Left-to-right parsing of a sentence.• [S [NP a cat] [VP is [PP on [NP the couch]]]]

S

NPa cat

VP

Vis

PPon the couch

Page 9: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

9

Working memory span or capacity• The amount of material that you can keep on your ‘scratch

pad’ is known as your working memory span or capacity.• How much is it?• Miller’s number: 7 ± 2

• It varies a little from person to person and even from domain to domain in the same person.• That’s the meaning of the “± 2”• Working memory span can be impaired in brain injury.• It has recently been shown to be correlated with fluid intelligence.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 10: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

10

The working memory needed for parsing …

… is part of a general purpose working memory

• Individual differences in working memory are implicated in strategies for understanding complex spoken sentences.

… constitutes its own specialized store of working memory.

• Some patients who share severe deficits of general purpose working memory are still able to understand complex spoken sentences.

• Individual differences in working memory are usually not implicated in on-line language understanding.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 11: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

SYNTAX 4Sentence comprehension and syntactic parsing

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University 11

Page 12: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

12

Syntax vs. pragmatics: Ferreira & CliftonSelf-paced reading (on-line) task

SentenceRelative clause

Subject Latency at by

1. The evidence examined by the lawyer shocked the jury.

reduced inanimate same as 3

2. The evidence that was examined by the lawyer shocked the jury.

unreduced inanimate quicker than 1

3. The defendant examined by the lawyer shocked the jury.

reduced animate same as 1

4. The defendant that was examined by the lawyer shocked the jury.

unreduced animate quicker than 3

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

The fact that there is no garden path at by in (3) shows that syntax can perform the parse without access to pragmatics.

Page 13: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

13

Just & CarpenterLow reading span

Latency at by

unreducedrelative clause

reducedrelative clause

inanimatesubject

~450 ms ~500 ms

animatesubject

~450 ms ~500 ms

High reading spanLatency at by

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

unreducedrelative clause

reducedrelative clause

inanimatesubject

~350 ms ~400 ms

animatesubject

~425 ms ~475 ms

Same as before: no competition from pragmatics to confuse (and

slow down) syntactic parse

Different: latency is indeed longer in bottom cell than top cell of reduced

relative clause > pragmatics creates a garden path

Page 14: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

14

Why?• ‘Cognitive capacity’

• Low span readers only have enough capacity to process syntactic cues; nothing is left over to process pragmatics > modular processing (syntax first).

• High span readers have enough capacity to process syntactic cues and pragmatics > interactive processing (all cues considered simultaneously).

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 15: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

15

Syntactic complexity• How about these sentences?

• 8a) The dog chased the cat.• 8b) The cat hunted the rat.• 8c) The rat nibbled the cheese.• 9) The rat the cat hunted nibbled the cheese.• 10) The rat the cat the dog chased hunted nibbled the cheese.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 16: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

16

Center embedding

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

9) The rat the cat hunted nibbled the cheese.

The rat which the cat hunted nibbled the cheese.

10) The rat the cat the dog chased hunted nibbled the cheese.

The rat which the cat which the dog chased hunted nibbled the cheese.

Page 17: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

17

How might this be processed?

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

thematic role for ‘the rat’

thematic role for ‘the cat’

thematic role for ‘the dog’

The parser encounters …

the rat > look for a predicate to supply a thematic role …

the cat > wait, put the previous search on hold & look for another predicate to supply a thematic role …

the dog > wait, put the previous search on hold & look for yet another predicate to supply a thematic role …

Ok, now I am lost.

push-down stack

Page 18: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

18

Interim conclusion• The limit on center embedded is 2.• Given that Miller’s number is much larger, it would appear

that there is a working memory specialized for parsing.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 19: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

19

‘Edge’ embedding does not create this problem

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

i) The dog chased the cat that hunted the rat that nibbled the cheese.

ii) The dog that chased the cat that hunted the rat that nibbled the cheese was a dachshund.

Page 20: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

20

Thinking about sentences, and science

1. Mary bought a book for John.• The direct object THEME follows the verb in English.

2. Which book did Mary buy for John?• The direct object THEME follows the verb in English or precede its

clause when it is introduced by which.

3. John asked Mary about a student.• TOPIC is the object of the preposition about.

4. Which student did John ask Mary about?• TOPIC is the object of the preposition about, or it precedes its

clause when it is introduced by which.

• Is adding "it precedes its clause when it is introduced by which" a good idea?

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 21: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

21

Generalization• You should have gotten the idea that every statement that

is made about NPs in English must be duplicated to take into account questions with which.• But clefting requires a tripling of statements about NPs:

• This book is what Mary bought for John.• Leprechauns is what John asked Mary about.

• And there are even more constructions that require even more duplication.

• Is this a good way to describe the grammar of English?• NO! because we lose track of perfectly good generalizations like

• the direct object follows the verb or • THEME is usually the direct object.

• Is there a principle of science that can help us out here?

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 22: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

22

Leprechauns!

• Think of an explanation for something:1. The Earth spinning on its axis

makes day and night.

2. The Earth spinning on its axis or leprechauns pushing it, makes day and night.

3. Rain falls when water condenses in the atmosphere.

4. Rain falls when water condenses in the atmosphere or leprechauns piss from clouds.

• Does adding leprechauns to all our explanations make them better?

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 23: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

23

Ockham’s razor, simplicity, economylex parsimoniae

• Ockham’s razor is a principle that generally recommends selecting from among competing hypotheses the one that makes the fewest new assumptions.

• Einstein-ish: “Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler.”

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 24: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

24

Back to our sentences• The sentences and their leprechauns

a. Mary bought a book for John.

b. Which book did Mary buy for John?

c. John asked Mary about a student.

d. Which student did John ask Mary about?

• How to get rid of the leprechaunsa. Mary bought a book for John.

b. Which booki did Mary buy ____i for John?

c. John asked Mary about a student.

d. Which studenti did John ask Mary about ____i ?

• (b, d) are called filler-gap constructions, though the gap is also called a trace.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 25: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

25

Final project• Improve a Wikipedia article about any of the topics

mentioned in class or any other topic broadly related to neurolinguistics.

• Write a short essay explaining what you did and why you did it.

• Print the article before you improve it, highlighting any subtractions.

• Print the article after you improve it, highlighting your additions.

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University

Page 26: SYNTAX 5 NOV 18, 2015 – DAY 35 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Fall 2015.

NEXT TIMEMore syntax

11/18/15 Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University 26