Local Governments Law 154 • SY 2011-2012 • Prof. Dante Gatmaytan Part I. Introduction: History and Basic Concepts Basic Laws Article X, 1987 Constitution Administrative Code of 1987, Title XII, as amended Republic Act No. 7160 (1992) Republic Act No. 6975 (1990), §§ 4-12 Republic Act No. 8551 (1998) Republic Act No. 9263 (2004) Preliminary Readings: Overview, history, assessment • Aquilino Q. Pimentel, Jr., The Local Government Code of 1991: Key to National Development 1-12 (1993) • The World Bank, Decentralization: Rethinking Government, in World Development Report 1999/2000: Entering the 21** Century 107-124 (1999) • Alecks P. Pabico, Parables and Paradoxes in Devolution, i-Report, January 2007 at http:/ / pcij.org/ stories/ parables-and-paradox-in-devolution/ Local government, decentralization, autonomy Pimentel, pp. 13-17 DE LEON v. ESGUERRA, 153 SCRA 602 (1987) SAN JUAN v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, 196 SCRA 69 (1991) GANZON v. CA, 200 SCRA 271 (1991) BASCO v. PAGCOR, 197 SCRA 52 (1991) MAGTAJAS v. PRYCE PROPERTIES CORPORATION, INC., 234 SCRA 255 (1994) Local governments, administrative regions, autonomous regions See Republic Act No. 7227 (1992), §§ 12 (i), 14 ABBAS v. COMELEC, 179 SCRA 287 (1989) CHIONGBIAN v. ORBOS, 245 SCRA 253 (1995) CORDILLERA BROAD COALITION v. COA, 181 SCRA 495 (1990) ORDILLO v. COMELEC, 192 SCRA 100 (1990) BAGABUYO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, 573 SCRA 290 (2008)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Local GovernmentsLaw 154 • SY 2011-2012 • Prof. Dante Gatmaytan
Part I. Introduction: History and Basic Concepts
Basic Laws
Article X, 1987 ConstitutionAdministrative Code of 1987, Title XII, as amended
DE LEON v. ESGUERRA, 153 SCRA 602 (1987)SAN JUAN v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, 196 SCRA 69 (1991)GANZON v. CA, 200 SCRA 271 (1991)BASCO v. PAGCOR, 197 SCRA 52 (1991)
MAGTAJAS v. PRYCE PROPERTIES CORPORATION, INC., 234 SCRA 255 (1994)
Local governments, administrative regions, autonomous regions
See Republic Act No. 7227 (1992), §§ 12 (i), 14
ABBAS v. COMELEC, 179 SCRA 287 (1989)CHIONGBIAN v. ORBOS, 245 SCRA 253 (1995)CORDILLERA BROAD COALITION v. COA, 181 SCRA 495 (1990)
ORDILLO v. COMELEC, 192 SCRA 100 (1990)BAGABUYO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, 573 SCRA 290 (2008)
THE PROVINCE OF NORTH COTABATO v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLICOF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON ANCESTRAL DOMAIN, 568 SCRA 402
(2008)
Effectivity of the Code, §§ 5(d), 536
EVARDONE v. COMELEC, 204 SCRA 464 (1991)SECRETARY OF HEALTH v. COURT OF APPEALS, 241 SCRA 688 (1995)
Part II. Book I: General ProvisionsTitle One: Basic Principles
A. Policy and Application
Rep. Act No. 7160, §§1-4
Rules of Interpretation, § 5
GREATER BALANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. BALANGA, 239 SCRA 436
PADILLA v. COMELEC, 214 SCRA 735 (1992)TORRALBA v. SIB AGAT, 147 SCRA 390 (1987)CAWALING v. COMELEC, 368 SCRA 453 (2001)PELAEZ v. AUDITOR GENERAL, 15 SCRA 569 (1965)SEMA v. COMELEC, 558 SCRA 700 (2008)LATASA v, COMELEC, 417 SCRA 601 (2003)MUNICIPALITY OF NUEVA ERA, ILOCOS NORTE v. vs. MUNICIPALITY OF
MARCOS, G.R. No. 169435, February 27,2008
De Facto Corporations
MALABANG v. BENITO, 27 SCRA 533 (1969)
MUNICIPALITY OF SAN NARCISO, QUEZON v. MENDEZ, 239 SCRA 11 (1994)
CANDIJAY v. CA, 251 SCRA 530 (1995)JIMENEZ v. BAZ, 265 SCRA 182 (1996)TOBIAS v. ABALOS, 239 SCRA 106 (1994)PASIG v. COMELEC, 314 SCRA 179 (1999)MARIANO v. COMELEC, 242 SCRA 211 (1995)MIRANDA v. AGUIRRE, 314 SCRA 603 (1999)SAMSON v. AGUIRRE, 315 SCRA 53 (1999)
Abolition
SULTAN USMAN SARANGANI v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, 334 SCRA-379
(2000)SALVA v. MAKALINTAL, 340 SCRA 506 (2000)
Income
ALVAREZ v. GUINGONA, 252 SCRA 695 (1996)LEAGUE OF CITIES OF THE PHILIPPINES v. COMELEC, G.R. 176951, February 15,2011
Population
AQUINO m v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 18973, April 7,2010ALDABA v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 188078, January 25,2010
Sub-Provinces
Constitution, Art. XVIII, § 9
Rep. Act No. 7160, §462
GRINO v. COMELEC, 213 SCRA 672 (1992)
Selection and Transfer of Local Government Site, § 11
SAMSON v. AGUIRRE, 315 SCRA 53 (1999)
Political and Corporate Nature of Local Government Units, §§ 5 (d) & 15
LIDASAN v. COMELEC, 21 SCRA 496 (1964)TORIO v. FONTANILLA, 85 SCRA 599 (1978)OTY OF MANILA v. IAC, 179 SCRA 428 (1989)MACASIANO v. DIOKNO, 212 SCRA 464 (1992)
U.S. v. SALAVERIA, 39 Phil. 103 (1918)VIRAY v. CALOOCAN, 20 SCRA 791 (1967)BALACUIT v. CFI, 163 SCRA 182 (1988)BINAY v. DOMINGO 201 SCRA 508 (1991)CITY GOVERNMENT OF QUEZON CITY v. ERICTA, 122 SCRA 759 (1983)PATALINGHUG v. CA, 229 SCRA 554 (1994)REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. THE CITY OF DAVAO, 388 SCRA 691 (2002)RURAL BANK OF MAKATI, INC. v. MUNICIPALITY OF MAKATI, 433 SCRA 362
(2004)TAYABAN v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, 517 SCRA 488 (2007)BAYAN v. ERMITA, 488 SCRA 226 (2006)
abatement of nuisance
LGC,§§447&458
Republic Act No. 9165 (2002), §§ 52-53
TATEL v. VIRAC, 207 SCRA 157 (1991)ESTATE OF FRANCISCO v. CA, 199 SCRA 595 (1991)TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPERS, INC. v. CA, 193 SCRA 147 (1991)TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPERS, INC. v. CA, 201 SCRA xi (1991)
SAN FERNANDO v. FIRME, 195 SCRA 692 (1991)FERNANDO v. CA, 208 SCRA 714 (1992)GUILLERGAN v. GANZON, 17 SCRA 257 (1966)PILAR v. SANGGUNINANG BAYAN NG DASOL, PANGASINAN, 128 SCRA 173
(1984)TUZON v. COURT OF APPEALS, 212 SCRA 739 (1992)BALUYOT v. COURT OF APPEALS, 311 SCRA 29 (1999)
QUEZON CITY v. DACARA, 460 SCRA 243 (2005)THE MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, METRO MANILA V. COURT OF APPEALS, 466SCRA 78 (2005)OSMENA v. COA, G.R. No. 188818, May 31,2011
Chapter 3: Intergovernmental Relations—National Government and Local GovernmentUnits
SALCEDOII v. COMELEC, 312 SCRA 447 (1999)CIPRIANO v. COMELEC, 436 SCRA 45 (2004)BAUTISTA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, 414 SCRA 299 (2003)MATUGAS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTION, 420 SCRA 365 (2004)
JAPZON v. COMELEC, 576 SCRA 331 (2009)CORODORA v. COMELEC, G.R. No.176947, February 19, 2008MARUHOM v. COMELEC, 594 SCRA 108 (2009)
LABO v. COMELEC AND ORTEGA, 211 SCRA 297 (1992)FRIVALDO v. COMELEC, 257 SCRA 727 (1996)
ALTAREJOS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, 441 SCRA 655 (2004)IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF TESS DUMPIT-
MICHELENA, G.R. Nos. 163619-20. November 17,2005TORAYNO v. COMELEC, 337 SCRA 574 (2000)PAPANDAYAN v. COMELEC, 381 SCRA 133 (2002)
BASCO v. PAGCOR, 197 SCRA 52 (1991)ESTANISLAO v. COSTALES, 196 SCRA 853 (1991)FLORO CEMENT v. GOROSPE, 200 SCRA 480 (1991)FIGUERRES v. COURT OF APPEALS, 305 SCRA 206 (1999)THE CITY OF OLONGAPO v. THE STALLHOLDERS OF THE EAST BAJAC-BAJACPUBLIC MARKET OF OLONGAPO CITY, 343 SCRA 705 (2000)BERDIN v. MASCARINAS, 526 SCRA 592 (2007)OLIVARES v. MARQUEZ, 438 SCRA 679 (2004)
Common Limitations on the Taxing Powers of Local Government Units
BULACAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, 299 SCRA 442 (1998)FIRST PHILIPPINE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, 300 SCRA661 (1998)PALMA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. MUNICIPALITY OF MALANGAS, 413SCRA 572 (2003)BATANGAS POWER CORPORATION v. BATANGAS CITY and NATIONAL POWER
CORPORATION, 428 SCRA 250 (2004)LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY v. AMBANLOC, G.R. No.
180639, June 29,2010
Franchise Taxes, §§ 137,193,534
MERALCO v. PROVINCE OF LAGUNA, 306 SCRA 750 (1999)
882"*82 §§ 'juauponv anuaAa^ iBvuaiur
61S-9XS §§ 'saDireuipjo xb} jo suopBioiy\
8002 '91 Jaquia^das 'X6*SSI•ON WD 'STVSddV dO IHflOD a snOfldNIHVPM dO HOSS3SSV IVIDNIAOHd
8002 '9X Jaquiaidas T6*SSX *ON WD 'OVAVd dO AJJD 'AIHVPMS(Z002) X*S VHDS 9XS 'NVNISVDNVd dO SDNIAOHd *A TSlIDId
(Z002) 98X VHDS 9XS 'SVDNVIV3 dO 3DNIAOHd -A ADH3N3 ST3d(9002)
69X VHDS 16* 'VT33VSI dO SDNIAOHd A NOIIVHOdHOD H3MOd TVNOIIVN(£002)
6S2 VHDS X0* 'NVfllVNVaVD dO AIID A NOIIVHOdHOD H3MOd TVNOIIVN(X002) 22S VHDS £9£ 'OVAVd dO AJJD A IdTd
ALVAREZ v. GUINGONA, 252 SCRA 695 (1996)PIMENTEL v. AGUIRRE, 336 SCRA201 (2000)THE PROVINCE OF BATANGAS v. ROMULO, 429 SCRA 736 (2004)ACORD v. ZAMORA, 459 SCRA 578 (2005)
Share of Local Government Units in National Wealth, §§ 289-294
Republic Act No. 7076, § 19.
Credit Financing, §§ 295-303
See CHAVEZ V. PUBLIC ESTATES AUTHORITY, 384 SCRA 152 (2002)
Local Fiscal Administration, §§ 304-354
MALONZO v. ZAMORA, 311 SCRA 224 (1999)ATIENZA v. VILLAROSA, 458 SCRA 385 (2005)
QUISUMBING v. Garcia, G.R. No. 175527, December 8,2008SISON v. PEOPLE, G.R. Nos. 170339,170398-403, March 9,2010CALINGIN v. DESIERTO, G.R. Nos. 145743-89, August 10,2007MONTUERTO v. TY, G.R. No. 177736, October 6,2008
Republic Act No. 8185 (1996)
Property and Supply Management in the Local Government Units, §§ 355-383
GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. THE PROVINCE OF TARLAC, 417SCRA 60 (2003)GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. CITY TREASURER, G.R. No.186242, December 23,2009
MENDOVA v. AFABLE, 393 SCRA 390 (2002)UY v. CONTRERAS, 237 SCRA 167 (1994)ZAMORA v. HEIRS OF IZQUIERDO, 443 SCRA 24 (2004)BOLEYLEY v. VILLANUEVA, 314 SCRA 364 (1999)VERCIDE v. JUDGE PRISCILLA T. HERNANDEZ, 330 SCRA 49 (2000)HEIRS OF VINZONS v. COURT OF APPEALS, 315 SCRA 541 (1999)IDOLOR v. COURT OF APPEALS, 351 SCRA 399 (2001)
AQUINO v. AURE, 546 SCRA 71 (2008)PANG-ET v. MANACNES-DAO-AS, G.R. No. 167261. March 2,2007
ALUNAN III v. MIRASOL, 276 SCRA 501 (1997)ASSOCIATED LABOR UNIONS v. LETRONDO, 237 SCRA 621 (1994)MIGUEL v. COURT OF APPEALS, 230 SCRA 339 (1994)
MARQUEZ v. COMELEC, 313 SCRA 103 (1999)GARVIDA v. SALES, 271 SCRA 767 (1997)ZARATE v. COMELEC, 318 SCRA 608 (1999)BAYTAN v. COMELEC, 396 SCRA 703 (2003) (third issue)MONTESCLAROS v. COMELEC, 384 SCRA 269 (2002)SAMBARANI v. COMELEC, 438 SCRA 319 (2004)
See Commission on Elections Resolution No. 00-0046, January 19,2000
The Municipality, §§ 440-447, § 444 (b)(3)
OLIVAREZ v. SANDIGANBAYAN, 248 SCRA 700 (1995)
UNITED BF HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION v. CITY MAYOR, 515 SCRA 1 (2007)
§§443,481
RAMOS v. CA, 108 SCRA 728 (1981)PILILIA v. CA, 233 SCRA 484 (1994)RAMOS v. CA, 269 SCRA 34 (1997)ALINSUG v. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, 225 SCRA 553 (1993)MANCENIDO v. COURT OF APPEALS, 380 SCRA 419 (2000)NATIVIDAD v. FELIX, 229 SCRA 680 (1994)REPUBLIC v. RAMBUYONG, G.R. No. 167810. October 4,2010
The City, §§448-458
Republic Act No. 9009 (2001)
CANET v. DECENA, 420 SCRA 388 (2004)AGUIRRE v, DE CASTRO, 321 SCRA 95 (1999)GORDON v. VERDIANOII, 167 SCRA 51 (1988)ACEBEDO OPTICAL COMPANY v. COURT OF APPEALS, 329 SCRA 314 (2000)LIM v. COURT OF APPEALS, 387 SCRA 149 (2002)
MATHAY, JR. v. FELT FOODS, INC., 311 SCRA 658 (1999)NEGROS ORIENTAL II ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. v. SANGGUNIANGPANGLUNGSOD NG DUMAGUETE155 SCRA 421 (1987)DADOLE v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, 393 SCRA 262 (2002)CITY OF CALOOCAN v. COURT OF APPEALS, 489 SCRA 45 (2006)SOCIAL JUSTICE SOCIETY v. ATIENZA, 517 SCRA 657 (2007)
The Province, §§ 459-468
CARAM v. COMELEC, 225 SCRA 731 (1993)THE PROVINCE OF NEGROS OCCIDENTAL v. ZAYCO, G.R. No. 182574, September28,2010
Appointive Local Officials Common to All Municipalities, Cities, and Provinces, §§ 469-490
RAPISORA v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, 228 SCRA 622 (1993)DBM v. LEONES, G.R. No. 169762, March 18,2010
Leagues of Local Government Units and Elective Officials, §§ 491-510
GALAROSA v. VALENCIA, 227 SCRA 728 (1993)MIGUEL v. COURT OF APPEALS, 230 SCRA 339 (1994)VIOLA v. ALUNAN ID, 277 SCRA 409 (1997)BITO-ONON v. FERNANDEZ, 350 SCRA 732 (2001)THE LIGA NG MGA BARANGAY NATIONAL v. THE CITY MAYOR OF MANILA,420 SCRA 562 (2004)THE NATIONAL LIGA NG MGA BARANGAY v. PAREDES, 439 SCRA 130 (2004)
Part IV. Miscellaneous and Final Provisions
Provisions for Implementation, §§ 511-525
Transitory Provisions, §§ 526-533
Application of the Code to Local Government Units in the Autonomous Regions, § 526
ABBAS v. COMELEC, 179 SCRA 287 (1989)LIMBONA v. MANGELIN, 170 SCRA 786 (1989)PANDI v. COURT OF APPEALS, 380 SCRA 436 (2002)DISOMANGCOP v. THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLICWORKS AND HIGHWAYS, 444 SCRA 203 (2004)
Cordillera Administrative RegionExecutive Order No. 220See Republic Act Nos. 6766 and 8438
ORDILLO v. COMELEC, 192 SCRA 100 (1990)CORDILLERA BROAD COALITION v. COA, 181 SCRA 495 (1990)BADUA v. CORDILLERA BODONG ASSOCIATION, 194 SCRA 101 (1991)ATTTIW v. ZAMORA, G.R. No. 143374, September 30,2005
The Metropolitan Manila Development Authority
Constitution, Art. X, § 11, Art XVIII, § 8
Republic Act No. 7924 (1995)
MMDA v. GARIN, 456 SCRA 176 (2005)MMDA v. BEL-AIR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, 328 SCRA 836 (2000)MMDA v. TRACKWORKS RAIL TRANSIT ADVERTISING, VENDING, ANDPROMOTIONS INC. 474 SCRA 331 (2005)FRANCISCO V. FERNANDO, 507 SCRA 173 (2006)MMDA v. VIRON TRANSPORTATION CO., 530 SCRA 341 (2007)MMDA v. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY, 574 SCRA 661 (2008)