Top Banner
Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients
13

Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

Jan 05, 2016

Download

Documents

Diane Jennings
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients

Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients

Page 2: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients

Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients

Data PresentationData Presentation

Page 3: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

AI-073: Switching Suppressed Patients to EFV/FTC/TDF

DeJesus E, et al. 48th ICAAC/46th IDSA, Washington, DC, 2008. Abst. H-1234

Phase IV, multicenter (55 US sites), open-label study (N=300)

Primary Endpoint: Non-inferiority of STR vs. SBR for HIV-1 RNA <200 c/mL

through Week 48 by TLOVR analysis

Randomization2:1

Stratify byPI or NNRTI

Continue

Switch• VL<200 c/mL

• Stable ARV Regimen • On 1st regimen or

suppressed on previous PI regimen

• No H/O VF

STR=EFV/FTC/TDF QD (n=203)

SBR=Stay on Baseline Regimen (n=97)

Page 4: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

AI-073: Results at 48 Weeks

Virologic Failure STR 3 , SBR 1

AE’s all grades

STR: Higher incidence

-Sleep disturbance 14% vs 0

-Dizziness 11% vs 1%

-GI (nauseas, diarrhea) 6% vs 2%

DC due to AE’s STR 10 (5%), SBR 1 (1%)

GFR (CG, MDRD) No significant changes

Change TG (mg/dl) STR -20, SBR -3 (P=0.035)

Pt preference STR 91%, SBR 9% (P=0.001)

% w

ith H

IV R

NA

<50

c/m

L (T

LOVR

)

Treatment Difference (STR – SBR)95% CI:2.6% (5.9%, 11.1%)

DeJesus E, et al. 48th ICAAC/46th IDSA, Washington, DC, 2008. Abst. H-1234

Page 5: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

ANRS 138: Enfuvirtide to Raltegravir Switch in Highly Experienced Patients

• Patients with triple-class resistance and HIV RNA <400 c/mL

• Randomized to continue ENF (n=85) or switch to RAL (n=84)

• Median of 13.6 years prior ART and 2.3 years on ENF

• Week 24 Results:• 89% <50 c/mL in both arms• Virologic Failure: 1 in each arm (∆ = 0.01%, 95% CI -4.4, +4.5)• No significant CD4 changes in either arm• Grade 3/4 AE: 11% ENF arm, 19% RAL arm (P=0.12)

• Conclusion: Raltegravir maintains suppression when substituted for ENF in fully suppressive regimens

De Castro N, et al. 16th CROI; Montreal, Canada; February 8-11, 2009. Abst. 572.

Page 6: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

STARTMRK:RAL vs. EFV in ARV-Naïve Patients

Lennox J, et al. 48th ICAAC/46th IDSA, 2008. Abst. H-896a

RAL + TDF/FTC EFV + TDF/FTC

Me

an

Ch

an

ge

(m

g/d

L)

Weeks

Pe

rce

nt

<5

0 C

op

ies

/mL

0 2 4 8 12 16 24 32 40 48

0

20

40

60

80

100

82%

Non-inferiorityP-Value <0.001

86%

CD4 Count Increase:189 vs. 163 (p<0.05)

Page 7: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

STARTMRK: Predictors of Success

Subgroup analyses support consistent efficacy across multiple virologic and immunologic parameters

% of Patients with HIV RNALevels <50 copies/mL

Subgroup Raltegravir Efavirenz

Overall 92% 89%

Baseline Plasma HIV RNA (c/mL) ≤50,000 95% 87%

>50,000 90% 90%

≤100,000 93% 89%

>100,000 91% 89%

Baseline CD4 Cell Counts (cells/mm3) ≤50 84% 86%

>50 to ≤200 89% 86%

>200 94% 92%

Lennox J, et al. 16th CROI; Montreal, Canada; February 8-11, 2009. Abst. 573.

Page 8: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

D:A:D Study: PIs and Risk of MI

0.9 1 1.1 1.3 1.4

Primary model

Dyslipidemia

Elevated blood pressure

Diabetes mellitus

Lipodystrophy

Glucose

All above + lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medication

Lopinavir/r Indinavir

RR of MI (95% CI)

Effect of Adjustment for Latest Metabolic Factors

* Approximate test for heterogeneity: P=0.02

IDV NFV LPV/r SAQ #PYFU: 68,469 56,529 37,136 44,657#MI: 298 197 150 221

1.2

1.13

1

0.9

RR

/ye

ar

(95

% C

I)

Risk with Cumulative Exposure to PI

Lundgren JD, et al. 16th CROI; Montreal, Canada; February 8-11, 2009. Abst. 42LB.

Page 9: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

SWITCHMRK 1 & 2:Study Design

• Identical, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled studies

• Enrolled pts with HIV RNA <50 c/mL on LPV/r BID regimen in combination with at least 2 NRTIs

• No limit on number of prior ART regimens

• Prior virologic failure not an exclusion

• No lipid lowering therapy for at least 12 weeks

• Randomized (1:1) to continue LPV/r or switch to RAL

Eron J, et al. 16th CROI, Montreal, Canada, 2009. Abst. 70aLB.

SWITCHMRK 1 SWITCHMRK 2

RAL

(N=174)

LPV/r

(N=174)

RAL

(N=176)

LPV/r

(N=178)

HIV RNA

≤ 50 c/mL94.3% 92.5% 96.0% 95.5%

Mean CD4 (cells/mm3)

478 508 471 482

LPV/r ≤ 1 yr 16.7% 17.8% 17.6% 18.5%

Median yrs prior ART(min, max)

3.3

(0.3, 22.3)3.6

(0.5, 20.2) 3.7

(0.5,19.2)4.6

(0.6,16.3)

Median # prior ART(min, max)

5.0

(4.0, 16.0)5.0

(2.0, 5.0)5.5

(3.0,13.0)6.0

(4.0,14.0)

Page 10: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

*Median Percent Change **Not prespecified for test

SWITCHMRK 1 and 2:Mean Change in Lipids at Week 12

Eron J, et al. 16th CROI; Montreal, Canada; February 8-11, 2009. Abst. 70aLB.

FastingCholesterol

NonHDL-C

FastingTriglycerides*

Fasting LDL-C

FastingHDL-C

2%1% 2%

-15%

-2%4%

-41%

1%-1%

-13%

P<0.001P<0.001

P<0.001

P=0.704 nps**

RAL + ARTsLPV/r + ARTs

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

1%1% 3%

-15%

4%8%

-43%

-3%-1%

-12%

P<0.001P<0.001

P<0.001

P=0.269 nps**

FastingCholesterol

NonHDL-C

FastingTriglycerides*

Fasting LDL-C

FastingHDL-C

Cha

nge

from

bas

elin

e at

wee

k 12

, m

ean%

SWITCHMRK 1 SWITCHMRK 2

Page 11: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

• RAL not non-inferior to maintaining LPV/r

• Further Analysis underway to assess affect of Tx experience on results• 84% with confirmed HIV RNA >50 c/mL) in the RAL group were not on

1st ART regimen; 66% with history of VF on prior regimen(s)

SWITCHMRK 1 and 2:Virologic Outcomes (NC = F)

Eron J, et al. 16th CROI, Montreal, Canada, 2009. Abst. 70aLB.

Per

cent

H

IV R

NA

<50

Cop

ies/

mL

50

60

70

80

90

100SWITCHMRK 1

0 4 8 12 24Weeks

81%

87%

(95% CI) : -6.6 (-14.4, 1.2)

0 4 8 12 24Weeks

94%

88%

(95% CI) : -5.8 (-12.2, 0.2)

Page 12: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

SWITCHMRK 1 & 2: Resistance Summary at Time of Failure

Study DrugVirologic Failures

(>400 c/mL) Study drug mutations RTI mutations

RAL12

N155H K103N

None V118I, M184V; V179D

None V179E

G140G/S, Q148R, Q148Q/H, N155N/H D67D/G, M184V, T215T/I; Y181C

N155H M184M/V; K103R

N155H, Q148Q/R, Y143Y/C D67D/N, K70K/R, M184V, K219Q

Q148H, G140S M184V; K103N, P225H

G140G/S, Q148R, Q148Q/H, N155N/H, Q148Q/R None

N155H None

Y143Y/S, Q148Q/R None

None None

Not done Not done

LPV/r4

L10I/V, G16G/E, L63S, A71A/T, V77I None

Not done Not done

L10I, K20R, M36I, M46L, I54V, L63P, A71V, V82A, L90M K65R, D67N, K219E; K103R, Y181C

V11V/I, L63P, V77I None

Eron J, et al. 16th CROI; Montreal, Canada; February 8-11, 2009. Abst. 70aLB.

Page 13: Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients

Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients

Debate/DiscussionDebate/Discussion