Top Banner
SWIFT J1644+57 서서서서서 서서서서서서 서서서서서 서서서서서서서서서 서서서
12

SWIFT J1644+57

Feb 24, 2016

Download

Documents

kipling

서울대학교 물리천문학부 천문학전공 초기우주천체연구단 윤용민. SWIFT J1644+57. Brief introduction. Swift J1644+57 was first detected by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) at 12:57:45 UT on 28 March 2011. The source was assumed to be a gamma-ray burst and was named GRB110328A. Redshift : 0.35. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SWIFT J1644+57

SWIFT J1644+57

서울대학교 물리천문학부 천문학전공 초기우주천체연구단윤용민

Page 2: SWIFT J1644+57

Brief introduction Swift J1644+57 was first detected by the

Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) at 12:57:45 UT on 28 March 2011.

The source was assumed to be a gamma-ray burst and was named GRB110328A.

Redshift : 0.35

A. J. Levan et al. (2011)

Page 3: SWIFT J1644+57

There are two models to explain this phenomenon.

1. Main sequence star was tidally disrupted by 106 – 107 M◉ BH and its debris accreted into the central BH.

2. White dwarf star was tidally disrupted by ~ 104 M◉ BH.

Page 4: SWIFT J1644+57

Time

Flux

Procedure Finding out the fraction of bulge component using HST

images.

CQUEAN(g, r, i, z, Y band) and UKIRT(J, H, K band) data → SED fitting → determining stellar mass of the bulge

fraction.

Finding out the mass of the central black hole.

Analyzing the light curve of 1.5 years period.

M. Limousin et al. (2008)

Flux decay

Page 5: SWIFT J1644+57

Current Progress 1. WFC3 UVIS F606W image observed in

2011.12.02

2. WFC3 IR F160W image observed in 2011.12.02

Page 6: SWIFT J1644+57

2D fitting by GALFIT to decompose the bulge com-ponent.

1. One component fitting : de Vaucouleurs(Bulge), Exponential(Disk)

2. Two component fitting : Bulge + Disk, Bulge + PSF, Disk + PSF

3. Three component fitting Bulge + Disk + PSF

The models which have small chi-square value and rea-sonable parameters are selected as good fitting models.

Page 7: SWIFT J1644+57

Good fitting models of the optical image.

1. Single bulge component model (de Vaucouleurs profile)de Vaucouleurs profile

(Bulge)Magnitude 22.66Effective radius

0.24(arcsec)

Axis ratio 0.97

Page 8: SWIFT J1644+57

2. Bulge + PSF Modelde Vaucouleurs profile (Bulge)Magnitude 22.66Effective radius

0.27(arcsec)

Axis ratio 0.98PSF componentMagnitude 26.59

Total magnitude : 22.63

Page 9: SWIFT J1644+57

Good fitting models of the IR im-age.

1. Bulge + PSF Modelde Vaucouleurs profile (Bulge)Magnitude 21.50Effective radius

0.15(arcsec)

Axis ratio 0.96PSF componentMagnitude 22.75

Total magnitude : 21.20

Page 10: SWIFT J1644+57

2. Bulge + Disk + PSF Modelde Vaucouleurs profile (Bulge)Magnitude 22.08Effective radius

0.11(arcsec)

Axis ratio 0.72Exponential profile (Disk)Magnitude 22.92Effective radius

0.41(arcsec)

Axis ratio 0.82PSF componentMagnitude 22.41

Total magnitude : 21.22

Page 11: SWIFT J1644+57

Future work CQUEAN(g, r, i, z, Y band) and UKIRT(J, H, K band)

data → SED fitting → determining stellar mass of the bulge

fraction.

Finding out the mass of the central black hole. → Determining the disrupted star’s identity

A. J. Levan et al. (2011)

Page 12: SWIFT J1644+57

Thank you