Industry Partnerships Cascade Designs Inc. Day One Response, Inc. Sustainable Vision Workshop 3/22/2011
Jul 12, 2015
Industry PartnershipsCascade Designs Inc.
Day One Response, Inc.
Sustainable Vision Workshop3/22/2011
Agenda
Background: Cascade Designs Inc. (CDI)
Background: Day One Response
Case Study: SE200 Electrochlorinator
Partnering Strategies
Case Study: Day One Waterbag
Partner Selection Criteria and Pitfalls
Conclusions
Platypus Hydration SystemsDenali Snowshoes
MSR & SweetWaterPurifiers
Therm-A-Rest Sleep Pads
MSR Tents MSR Stoves
Under the brand names Mountain Safety Research (MSR), Platypus, and Therm-A-Rest
we are recognized as the technical and market leader in hydration systems, hand-held water
purifiers, lightweight camp stoves, cookware, sleep pads, and snowshoes.
Over 40 years of experience in developing innovative commercial and military products.
• Manufacturing expertise in a wide range of disciplines and
technologies – metal forming and fabrication, sewing, RF welding,
thermoforming, and final assembly. In-house microbiology lab.
• Cascade Designs has over 5,000 Outdoor retail accounts in the U.S.
and sales agents in over 40 countries around the world.
• Existing supplier of the Army and Marine Corps’ standard-issue sleep
pad, water purifier, camp stove, snowshoes, and dry bags.
Cascade Designs Inc. (CDI)Core Strengths
Background
• Cascade Designs’ core strength is bringing
innovative new technologies to market. [i.e. –
“Crossing the Valley of Death”].
• On the commercial side of our business,
market pressures require us to have something
new at the trade show every year.
• Government funded development efforts enable
us to “swing for the fences”, and partner with
universities and technology firms to research
cutting-edge technologies.
DoD Funding
$
Valley of Death
$
Product Revenue
“Providing clean drinking water is our #1 challenge in disaster zones.” -Steve Rieve, American Red Cross
Cal Poly State University & DayOne Response, Inc.
Day One ResponseBackground
All essential functions in one unit:
1. Easy Collection
Under difficult conditions
2. Transport
Backpack straps are comfortable
3. Treatment
Dirt, Cysts, viruses, bacteria removed
4. Storage and Dispensing
closure prevents re-contamination
The DayOne Waterbag™
Strategic Partnerships• Cal Poly State University R&D (2007-present)
• DayOne Response, Inc. founded April 2010 with guidance from Innovation Quest and NCIIA
• Partnership with Cascade Designs, Inc. and US Naval Facilities Engineering Command
• Working with P&G’s Children’s Safe Drinking Water program to expand the use of PUR in disasters and other development settings.
• Continued partnership with California Polytechnic University on R&D for current and future projects
Case Study: Electrochlorinators
Electro-
Chlorination
Halogenated
Resin
Solar
Radiation
Particle
Filtration
(Sieves)
Ceramic
Candle Filters
Hollow Fiber
Adsorption
Forward
Osmosis
Ion Exchange
Precipitant
Dosing
Oxidant
Dosing
Applied Energy Physical Separation Chemical Treatment
Apaclara
Capacitive
De-ionization
MIOX
MM Media
PATH
MSR
Halosource
TDA
Research
PATH
Access to cutting-edge technologies has given CDI the opportunity to evaluate the full spectrum of water purification technologies for use in the Base of the Pyramid markets.
Sweetwater
CDI Water Purification Technologies Map
Puralytics
Cal Poly
University
MIOX
MSR
Lemelson
Laird- Norton
Gates
Sefar
Light Year
Oasys
HTI
Resintech
Purolite
ORICA
Metal Ion
Treatment
Quartek
One Drop
Calgon
Biomin
Outdoor
• CDI has over a 35% share of the outdoor water purification
market.
Military
• CDI is the supplier of the Marine Corps’ standard-issue
Individual Water Purifier System.
• CDI has funded R&D efforts to develop next generation on-the-
move water purification systems for the Army, Marine Corps, and
Special Forces.
Developing World
• CDI is providing lab and technical support on PATH’s Safe
Water effort.
• Funded development projects include the SE200
Electrochlorinator (Africa) and Household Water Treatment
System (India).
BackgroundWater Purification Markets
BackgroundCDI History in Emerging Markets
2004 Tsunami: Lessons Learned
• Philanthropy wasn’t enough.
• Products need to be designed for the end
user.
• Logistics are critical.
• Decision to apply CDI’s resources
toward developing innovative technical
solutions to provide access to safe water.
BackgroundCDI Developing World Efforts
• Waterborne diseases are a major global
health problem.
• Seattle is a center for global health
initiatives (Gates Foundation, PATH,
World Vision, etc.).
• DoD-funded efforts have given CDI
access to cutting-edge water purification
technologies.
• CDI is trying to determine if we can
contribute in developing world markets.
[Can we leverage the strengths that made
us a leader in Outdoor and Military water
purification?].
Electrochlorinator uses electricity to convert salt into a powerful disinfectant.
• Early development work funded by DARPA.
• MSR MIOX Purifier launched to the outdoor market in November 2003.
Became the #1 selling Purifier in its first year on the market.
• Support from PATH and the Lemelson Foundation enabled CDI to adapt
the electrochlorinator technology for developing world applications.
Technology
• Supply chain, storage, and
transportation benefits.
• The capital and operating costs are
much lower than other small
community water purification
options.
• Disinfectant is created fresh for
each use. [No shelf life issues].
• “Smart circuit” technology
minimizes the potential for
operator error.
SE200 Electrochlorinator
SE200 Target Specifications
Treated Water Volume per run 200 liters (55gal)
Power Source External 12V Battery
Run Time 5-7 minutes
Voltage/Amperage 12V / 4.5A
Capacity (80 Amp hour Battery) 200 runs
Wholesale Cost Target $100
Approximate operational cost
per 1000 liters$0.13
Advantages
ConnectionsCal Poly Electrochlorinator Project
• The team at the Naval Facilities
Engineering Service Center (NFESC)
has helped CDI establish relationships
with a wide range of government and
industry partners.
• Bill Varnava, the project officer on
several of CDI’s military funded R&D
efforts, is a Cal Poly alumni, and
recommended that CDI consider
working with the University on a
Senior Project.
The Seawater Desalination Test Facility (SDTF) provides research, development, test and evaluation, and training support for water purification equipment.
Naval Base Ventura County (Port Hueneme, CA)
ProjectCal Poly Electrochlorinator
Students Colin Gibbs, John Wilson and
David Dyk
Advising
ProfessorLee McFarland
CDI Project
Manager Whitney Goodwin
Deliverable A unique design that functioned
within the target product
specifications was developed.
New ideas for dispensing and
measuring the disinfectant were
explored. Potential manufacturing
options were investigated.
Senior Design ProjectCal Poly Electrochlorinator
BenefitsStudents
• Gained experience in designing an innovative
water purification product.
Cal Poly
• Developed relationships with industry and
government contacts.
Cascade Designs
• Interaction with students forced the CDI
design team to reflect on the use modes and
design parameters.
• Students explored alternative design concepts
and technical approaches.
• Student team investigated innovative
manufacturing processes.
• Success on the Waterbag and
Electrochlorinator projects have enabled CDI
to expand our involvement with Universities.
Success FactorsCal Poly Electrochlorinator Project
• Project was relevant within Cascade
Designs. [Our design effort with PATH
was done concurrently].
• Strong project manager at Cascade
Designs. [Design lead worked with the
student team]. Willingness to invest time
and resources to support the student effort.
• Cal Poly students were smart and
motivated to succeed.
• Professor McFarland provided solid
coaching. [Emphasis on functionality and
manufacturability].
Seed MoneyLemelson SE200 Grant
• Adapt the MIOX electrochlorinator technology for
humanitarian and disaster relief applications.
• Study the requirements for rural small-community
water purification systems. Gather field data.
• Evaluate sustainability (micro-finance water kiosk
entrepreneur economic model).
• Leverage existing government funding. [Evaluate
new materials, power supply options, etc.].
• Position the CDI/PATH/Day One team to
participate in new humanitarian and disaster relief
efforts. [Operation Crimson Viper].
• Help CDI explore partnership opportunities with
Universities. [Cal Poly, UC Berkeley, UW, etc.]
What did the Lemelson Foundation grant enable the PATH/CDI team to accomplish?
Partnering
5% Technology - 95% All the other stuff
Business models
Cultural factors
User experience
Financing
Ease-of-use
Distribution
Supply chain
Maintenance
Cost
Idea Create Design
Concepts
Product
Specs
Explore Materials
& Technologies
Alpha
Prototype
Beta Prototype Design
Mods.
Finalize
Design
Product
Upgrades
Sales Input
Evaluate
Partnering Oppty.
Identify Standards
& Regulations
Evaluate Mkt.
Opportunity
Idea Product
Specs
Identify
User Needs
Demand
Curve
Market
Testing
Marketing
Strategy Packaging &
Instructions
Product
Launch
P.R. &
Promotions
Preview with
Key Buyers
Increase
Mkt. Share
Product
Launch
Scenario
Planning
Design
Reviews
File
Patents
Contract
Negotiations
Improve
Profitability
Develop I.P.P.
Strategy
Design
Reviews
Identify Potential
Suppliers
Sourcing &
Costing
Manufacturing
Strategy
Design
Tooling
Risk
Assessment
Quality
Strategy
Create
Inspection Plans
Design
Validation
First
Article
Continuous
Quality
Build
Tooling
Production Continuous
Quality
Product
Support Commercialization Concept Development
Engineering
Marketing
Sales
Admin.
Operations
Quality
Technology Transition
Technology Scale-UpCascade Designs Inc.
Phase Description Objective
Proof-of-Concept
Conduct design studies. Buildmock-ups and alpha prototypes. {1 off}
Ideate the most effective product concepts. Identify key performanceindicators.
Beta Prototype & Test
Build functional prototypes and conduct lab and field testing. {5-10}
Demonstrate that the concept has the potential to meet the target product requirements.
Low-Rate Product
Build product samples with “soft tooling” and real materials. {50-500}
Conduct a comprehensive field test to evaluate product performance and training requirements.
Market TestingConduct a market study with early adopters in key target markets. {1000 – 10,000}
Track performance closely. Verify the product meets the needs of the key usergroups. [Price, durability, etc.]
Product LaunchFull-scale production and market introduction. {Pipeline filled. Re-orders.}
Product meets or exceeds customer requirements and sales projections
Market Expansion
Secondary markets and spin-off or accessory products are considered. {TBD}
Leverage the product’s success to build market share and access new markets.
Case Study: DayOne Waterbag, Scaling and Partnerships
Concept
(2007)
Iterations
(2007-2010)
Product
(2011)
Phase Description Objective
Beta Prototype& Test
Build functional prototypes and conduct lab and field testing. {5-10}
Demonstrate that the concept has the potential to meet the target product requirements.
Waterbag 2007-2009
Nicaragua 2009
Phase Description Objective
Low-Rate Product
Build product samples with “soft tooling” and real materials. {50-500}
Conduct a comprehensive field test to evaluate product performance and training requirements.
Waterbag 2010-2011
Crimson Viper, Thailand, July 2010
Waterbag 2010-2011
Haiti, March 2011
Phase Description Objective
Low-Rate Product
Build product samples with “soft tooling” and real materials. {50-500}
Conduct a comprehensive field test to evaluate product performance and training requirements.
Waterbag Next Steps…Phase Description Objective
Market Testing Conduct a market study with early adopters in key target markets. {1000 – 10,000}
Track performance closely. Verify the product meets the needs of the key user groups. [Price, durability, etc.]
Product Launch Full-scale production and market introduction. {Pipeline filled. Re-orders.}
Product meets or exceeds customer requirements and sales projections.
Market Expansion Secondary markets and spin-off or accessory products are considered. {TBD}
Leverage the product’s success to build market share and access new markets.
What factors does Cascade Designs consider when evaluating potential industry or University partners?
PartneringSelection Criteria
Technical Advantage – Does the product concept have a
competitive advantage over the existing COTS products.
Passion – Does this team have the vision, talent and
commitment to get the job done?
Business Compatibility – Are the business interests
aligned?
Synergy – Does this opportunity fit in with other existing
development projects or strategic objectives?
Distribution Fit – Can we sell the products resulting from
this effort into one of our existing markets?
Manufacturing Fit – Can we produce the future products
with our existing manufacturing capabilities?
I.P. Protection – Is defensible I.P. protection available?
Risk – What are the potential risks vs. rewards?
Operation Crimson Viper Field Testing
What are some of the factors that often cause inventors and start-up companies to struggle?
PitfallsInventors & Start-ups
• Fail to partner with other organizations.
[Try to do it all themselves].
• Lack a clear understanding of the target
markets and competitive landscape.
• Unrealistic expectations regarding the
value of their idea. [Std. royalty Outdoor
market: 2-5% net profits].
• Unable to identify a “Champion” within
their key distribution channels. [Believe
that a better mousetrap just sells.].
• Funding. [Dilution of ownership, cash
flow].
Thanks
Next Steps
• Need to gain a better understanding of the
HADR user needs and product
requirements.
• Need to identify which DoD/government
agencies are relevant to our cause. [“Map
the foodchain”].
• Set up meetings with contacts in key
HADR agencies. Brief them on our active
and planned development projects.
[“Connect the dots”].
• Find the best ways to channel our strong
corporate and political support.
• Find new ways to get our “80% solution”
product concepts out in the field for market
testing.
• What all the Lemeslon Funding
allowed us to do
?Background
Economics of the SE200
• Resupply items: • 30 kg salt per 40,000 liters of water
($4)
• charge 12V car battery each 40,000
liters ($1.30 at a charging station1)
• Raw water
• Capital costs: • SE200 ($100 wholesale cost target)
• 12V 80 Amp-hour battery ($100)
• Total Capital Costs: $200
• Operational cost per 1000 liters:
$0.13
1 Electricity battery charging cost is based on charging station price. It would be less if the operator has
access to electricity and does not need to go to a charging station.
Development Business Model (Aquaya)
Ratio of consumable costs to sales 0.02
WATER SALES INCOME US$
Monthly sales from water at 4 Ksh/20L $ 139
Yearly Sales from water at 4Ksh/20L $ 1,669
5 Year Sales of water at 4Ksh/20L $ 8,343
OPERATIONAL COSTS US$
Amount spent on battery recharges over 5 years $ 130.36
Amount spent on salt over 5 years $ 31.30
Total consumable costs over 5 years $ 161.66
Comparison of oxidants (operational costs)
ProductAquatabs PUR Packets WaterGuard SE200
MedentechProctor and Gamble ($)
WaterGuard, Kenya ($)
Cascade Designs, Inc. ($)
Use modeTablets
Sachets of powder
Dilute liquidchlorine
Chlorine production
Cost per 1000 liters1.40 10.00 0.22 0.13
Shelf life5 years 3 years 6 months -1 year 5 years+
Special storage conditions
controlled temperature
controlled temperature
controlled temperature
no
Air transportable without permits
yes yes no no
Indication of safetyno no no Lights, auto-stop
Field Trials
•December, 2008: Kenya – Kenya, installation of a 20 L electrochlorinator.
– Collect initial operator/training feedback
•June, 2009:Kenya– Kenya, revisit 20L installation
– Hold focus groups on 200L alpha prototype
– Collect qualitative feedback
•Spring/Summer, 2010: Ghana, Kenya, Zimbabwe– Set up first SE200 water kiosks
– Carry out quantitative microbial studies in households
– Collect operator and customer feedback
– Develop preliminary financial model
•July, 2010: Disaster Response Exercise in Thailand– Simulated disaster scenario
– Train Thai Marines to operate the SE200
– Compare to 5 other disaster relief water technologies
• Strategic alliances are favored by DoD
R&D funding patrons (ONR, DARPA,
etc.). [CDI hunts most effectively in
packs].
• CDI and PARC have complimentary
core strengths.
• CDI’s in-house manufacturing
engineering, prototyping and LRIP
production capability can compliment
PARC technology transition efforts.
• CDI can serve as a Prime contractor
on collaborative development efforts
(SBIRs, etc.).
• CDI has the brand recognition,
marketing expertise, and distribution
network to bring PARC technologies to
the Outdoor and military markets.
Partnership Opportunities
Economics of the SE200
• Resupply items: • 30 kg salt per 40,000 liters of water
($4)
• charge 12V car battery each 40,000
liters ($1.30 at a charging station1)
• Raw water
• Capital costs: • SE200 ($100 wholesale cost target)
• 12V 80 Amp-hour battery ($100)
• Total Capital Costs: $200
• Operational cost per 1000 liters:
$0.13
1 Electricity battery charging cost is based on charging station price. It would be less if the operator has
access to electricity and does not need to go to a charging station.
Development Business Model (Aquaya)
Ratio of consumable costs to sales 0.02
WATER SALES INCOME US$
Monthly sales from water at 4 Ksh/20L $ 139
Yearly Sales from water at 4Ksh/20L $ 1,669
5 Year Sales of water at 4Ksh/20L $ 8,343
OPERATIONAL COSTS US$
Amount spent on battery recharges over 5 years $ 130.36
Amount spent on salt over 5 years $ 31.30
Total consumable costs over 5 years $ 161.66
Comparison of oxidants (operational costs)
ProductAquatabs PUR Packets WaterGuard SE200
MedentechProctor and Gamble ($)
WaterGuard, Kenya ($)
Cascade Designs, Inc. ($)
Use modeTablets
Sachets of powder
Dilute liquidchlorine
Chlorine production
Cost per 1000 liters1.40 10.00 0.22 0.13
Shelf life5 years 3 years 6 months -1 year 5 years+
Special storage conditions
controlled temperature
controlled temperature
controlled temperature
no
Air transportable without permits
yes yes no no
Indication of safetyno no no Lights, auto-stop
Field Trials
•December, 2008: Kenya – Kenya, installation of a 20 L electrochlorinator.
– Collect initial operator/training feedback
•June, 2009:Kenya– Kenya, revisit 20L installation
– Hold focus groups on 200L alpha prototype
– Collect qualitative feedback
•Spring/Summer, 2010: Ghana, Kenya, Zimbabwe– Set up first SE200 water kiosks
– Carry out quantitative microbial studies in households
– Collect operator and customer feedback
– Develop preliminary financial model
•July, 2010: Disaster Response Exercise in Thailand– Simulated disaster scenario
– Train Thai Marines to operate the SE200
– Compare to 5 other disaster relief water technologies