SUTRA: Sustainable Urban Transportation Final Review Gdansk, June 23/24 2003. DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria [email protected] http://www.ess.co.at Environmental Software & Services A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen. Presentation Overview. Agenda and Schedule SUTRA: an overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
• Agenda and Schedule• SUTRA: an overview• Project Administration• Progress and Results• Outlook and Exploitation
3 Final Review
Agenda and ScheduleAgenda and ScheduleMorning session, 09:00-12:30
Introduction and framework
1 Introduction, overview ESS
2 Framework: indicators and scenarios FEEM
3 Framework: techno-economic modeling UGE
The tools 4 Transportation modeling PTV
5 AQ modeling: emission and models UAV
4 Final Review
Agenda and ScheduleAgenda and ScheduleAfternoon Session 14:00 - 17:00
Case Study Applications7 Case study overview UAV8 Success stories CoGAnalysis9 Assessment and economics TUG,FEEM10 Analysis and benchmarking MEI, ARPALUser Feedback11 User perspective: GenoaCity of Genoa12 User perspective: Gdansk City of Gdansk13 General discussion
5 Final Review
SUTRA ObjectivesSUTRA Objectivesto develop a consistent and comprehensive
approach and planning methodology for the analysis of urban transportation problems to design strategies for sustainable cities.
This includes the integration of:– socio-economic – environmental and – technological concepts – multi-criteria assessment – policy level decision support.
– Techno-economic model– Transportation model– Emission model– Air quality models (street canyon, city level,
regional)4. Multi-criteria assessment:
– Economics, environment, public health
7 Final Review
SUTRA methodology:SUTRA methodology:In other words:
SUTRA builds a MODEL SYSTEM that processes a SCENARIO of urban transportation into a set of POLICY LEVEL INDICATORS – but with all the underlying technical detail in a consistent and quantitative manner.
8 Final Review
SUTRA: project factsSUTRA: project facts• Duration: July 2000 – June 2003,
36 months after contract amendment• Partners: 11 (originally 12) from 10
countries incl. Argentina (UBG)• Project web server:
http://www.ess.co.at/SUTRA/
9 Final Review
SUTRA: project factsSUTRA: project facts
• 13 major meetings of more than 2 partners incl. 7 full Board meetings
• 33 (of 35) Deliverables with a total of more than 1,500 pages or 15 kg)
• eMail list: > 3,000 mail messages• 127 data sets (of multiple files) in the
document tracking system• > 400 MB of data and documents on-
line at the project web server.
10
Final Review
SUTRA: project statusSUTRA: project status
WE ARE DONE …….–Final Report, final version–Final Cost Statements–Deliverable updates–Exploitation (continuing)
11
Final Review
SUTRA: achievementsSUTRA: achievements• Methodology development• Tool integration, model cascade
(7 incl. fuzzy logic expert system)
• Case studies (6 out of 7)• Assessment economics, air quality, public health
• Analysis, benchmarking• Reporting• Exploitation: on-line results, data
bases and analysis tools
12
Final Review
SUTRA: achievementsSUTRA: achievementsExploitation: • on-line results and reports• City data base with 70+ European
cities 40+ indicators, on-line benchmarking tool
• SUTRA cities: all indicators and scenario results
• SUTRA cities: on-line city level air quality modeling, population exposure
13
Final Review
SUTRA: ResultsSUTRA: ResultsStep 1:• A framework of (79) indicators
that define a common language, interface between the models, and the basic results for policy-level DSS