Top Banner
Physiology of Marbling Susan K. Duckett Clemson University
26

Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Dec 30, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Physiology of MarblingSusan K. Duckett

Clemson University

Page 2: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Marbling

Choice-Upper Choice,

CABSelect

Prime

Page 3: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

National Beef Quality Audits

2016 vs. 1993

+64% Prime

+75% Upper Choice (CAB)

-35% Select

-86% Standard

71% Choice 55%

Choice

Page 4: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Why?

DISCOUNTS and premiums

Marbling h2 = 0.48Carcass EPDs

Page 5: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Choice – Select Spread

Choice – Select Spread$2 - $25/cwt differential

Avg. HCW = 879 lb$18 - $220/carcass loss

Graph taken from CAB Insider, May 2 2018

Page 6: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Premiums and Incentives

CAB (Upper Choice):$4-14/cwt premium

PRIME:$9-26/cwt premium

Page 7: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Current Market

Base Price: Ch YG 3$202.60/cwt

Premiums:Prime 1-3 $13.80/cwtCAB 1-3 $5.28/cwtYG 1 $3.86/cwt

Discounts:Select $-13.65/cwtStandard $-29.77/cwtYG 4 $-11.21/cwt

Page 8: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Historical Model of Marbling Deposition

• Marbling:• Last to be deposited and First to be mobilized

Page 9: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

IMF

Hood and Allen, 1973, J. Lipid Res. 14:605-609

Marbling, intramuscular

Backfat, subcutaneous

Page 10: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Du et al. 2015. Meat Sci. 40-47

Recent Models of Marbling Deposition

Page 11: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

IMF Fractional Growth Rate

Bruns et al. 2004. JAS 82:1315-22

Hot carcass weight, lb450-550 550-650 650-748 748-849

Page 12: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Can we Accelerate Marbling Deposition?

Page 13: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Creep Feeding

Page 14: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Creep Feeding -

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Pasture Drylot, nocreep

Drylot,creep

Control Limitedcreep

(1kg/d)

Unlimitedcreep

Corn Soybeanhulls

Mar

blin

g sc

ore

, 50

0 =

Sm

all

Deutscher/Slyter Faulkner

a

c

b

* * *

Deutscher and Slyter, 1978, JAS 47:19-28. SD, 6 yrFaulkner et al. 1994. JAS 72:470-477. Illinois

Page 15: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Creep Feeding -

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

EW NW + creep NW

%

low Choice UpperChoice Prime

Myers et al. 1999. JAS 77:300-310. Illinois

93%a

>Modest

68%b

>Modest

68%b

>Modest

Page 16: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Time of Weaning

Page 17: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Early vs. Normal Weaning

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

NW EW

%

≥Choice- ≥Upper ChoiceWiseman et al. 2019. JAS 97:1198-1211

EW = 130 dNW = 226 d98 d dry lot period220 d grazing periodFeedlot finishing

Page 18: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Metabolic Imprinting – Early Weaned Steers

Scheffler et al. (2014)

Early weaned @ 105 d of age (MIP)Normal weaned @ 253 d of age (NW)

MIP fed CONC d 105 to 253NW and MIP were grouped and grazed for 156 dNW and MIP were fed corn-silage based feedlot diet to 0.4 – 0.5 in of backfat

645

518

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

MIP NW

Mar

blin

g sc

ore

, 50

0=

smal

l

Page 19: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Diet or Animal Age?

• Is it exposure to high concentrate diets OR early weaning?

Page 20: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Changes in IMF across Time-on-Feed (TOF)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 28 56 84 112 140 168 196

%

Time-on-feed, d

TG PhL

Duckett et al., 1993, JAS 71:2079

Page 21: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Timing of Exposure to Concentrates (CONC)

Koch et al. 2018. Meat & Muscle Biol. 2:1-14.

CONC (n = 20)

FOR (n = 20)

FOR

FOR

FOR

FOR

CONC

CONC

Phase 1: 0-111d Phase 2: 97 d Phase 3: to 1250 lb

NW and 30d background

CONC: FOR:25% corn silage Novel fescue75% corn/sbm Annual ryegrass

AlfalfaCowpea

CONC-CONC

CONC-FOR

FOR-CONC

FOR-FOR

Page 22: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Study 1: Percent Choice or CAB

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

FOR-FOR FOR-CONC CONC-FOR CONC-CONC

% ≥Choice-

>CAB

a

a

b

c

a

bb

Page 23: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Study 2: Early Exposure

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

CONC FOR

%

≥Choice

≥CAB

Koch et al. 2019. Meat & Muscle Biol. (in revision)

Angus steers (n = 20)NW30-d backgroundFed for 111 d

Page 24: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Study 3: Time on CONC

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 40 80 120

%

Choice CAB

Page 25: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Insulin Resistance

Type II Diabetes

The proposed hypothesis for limited adipose tissue expandability. When the body is in a positive energy balance, the adipose tissue will expand to handle the excess energy. If the adipose tissue is not capable of expanding sufficiently, there will be a spillover of FFA to non-adipose tissue leading to harmful effects in liver, muscle and pancreas.

European Journal of Endocrinology 176, 2; 10.1530/EJE-16-0488

Page 26: Susan K. Duckett Clemson University

Conclusions

• Rethink our approach for calves with high marbling potential

• Marbling does not have to be a ‘LATE’ developingdepot

• Feeding high concentrates early is important• Creep feeding may help• EW vs NW

• exposure to concentrates early

• Early deposition will persist during forage finishing

• More research needs to be done…………