Survey History January 19, 2010, STE Meeting Discussed budget cutting, decided to meet again to discuss our credential program Feb 5, 2010, STE Meeting While discussing program change, we decided that we should determine what is and is not working. Two subcommittees charged. Student Survey (Chris Algier will present.) Faculty Survey Committee Randy Philipp, Chair Andre Branch Margie Gallego Lisa Lamb Val Pang My Luong Tran Cathy Zozakiewicz
Survey History
Dec 30, 2015
Survey History. January 19, 2010, STE Meeting Discussed budget cutting, decided to meet again to discuss our credential program Feb 5, 2010, STE Meeting While discussing program change, we decided that we should determine what is and is not working. Two subcommittees charged. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Survey HistoryJanuary 19, 2010, STE Meeting
Discussed budget cutting, decided to meet again to discuss our credential program
Feb 5, 2010, STE Meeting
While discussing program change, we decided that we should determine what is and is not working. Two subcommittees charged.
Student Survey (Chris Algier will present.)
Faculty Survey CommitteeRandy Philipp, Chair Andre Branch
Margie Gallego Lisa Lamb
Val Pang My Luong Tran
Cathy Zozakiewicz
Purpose of Faculty Survey
1) Do faculty think we should consider changing/revising/redesigning our credential programs?
Answer: Yes.
2) If we should consider changes, what should we consider?
Answer: This is not so clear.
Survey Questions 1, 21) (Response Required) Mark all that have applied to you during the past 3 years: ____ Tenure-track faculty ____ Full-time lecturer ____ Part-time lecturer ____ I supervise student teachers. ____ I teach credential courses. ____ I teach prerequisite credential courses. ____ I am a block leader. 2) (Response Required) Which best applies? While answering Questions 1–5 below, I am thinking primarily about ________ the multiple-subject credential program.
________ the single-subject credential program.
________ both the multiple- and single-subject credential programs.
Survey Questions #3-8
Who Responded?
# %F-T Lecturer 6 12%P-T Lecturer 13 27%Supervise ST 7 14%Unspecified 1 2%T/TT 22 45%Total 49 100%
All Respondents Yes maybe noss 58% 42% 0% 12ms 45% 55% 0% 22
both 40% 53% 7% 15Total 47% 51% 2% 49
Should we consider changing/revising/redesigning our credential programs?
All Respondents Yes maybe noss 7 5 0 12ms 10 12 0 22
both 6 8 1 15Total 23 25 1 49
Should we consider changing/revising/redesigning our credential programs?
Yes maybe noF-T Lecturer ss 0% 100% 0%
ms 50% 50% 0%both 0% 100% 0%
Total 17% 83% 0% 6
Yes maybe noF-T Lecturer ss 0 2 0 2
ms 1 1 0 2both 0 2 0 2
Total 1 5 0 6
Should we consider changing/revising/redesigning our credential programs?
Yes maybe noP-T Lecturer ss 75% 25% 0%
ms 17% 83% 0%both 0% 67% 33%
Total 31% 62% 8% 13
Yes maybe noP-T Lecturer ss 3 1 0 4
ms 1 5 0 6both 0 2 1 3
Total 4 8 1 13
Should we consider changing/revising/redesigning our credential programs?
Yes maybe noSupervise st ss 0% 100% 0%
ms 33% 67% 0%both 0% 0% 0%
Total 29% 71% 0% 7
Yes maybe noSupervise st ss 0 1 0 1
ms 2 4 0 6both 0 0 0 0
Total 2 5 0 7
Should we consider changing/revising/redesigning our credential programs?
Yes maybe noUnspecified ms 1 0 0 1
Should we consider changing/revising/redesigning our credential programs?
Yes maybe noTenure Track ss 80% 20% 0%
ms 71% 29% 0%both 60% 40% 0%
Total 68% 32% 0% 22
Yes maybe noTenure Track ss 4 1 0 5
ms 5 2 0 7both 6 4 0 10
Total 15 7 0 22
Multipl
e Subjec
t
Single Subjec
t
Both MS and SS
T/T FT-L PT-L Sup T/T FT-L PT-L Sup T/T FT-L PT-L SupStrengths 1 Faculty 1 1 Much Good Blocks Theory/Practice link 1 Cohort Model 1 Block Leaders 1 Coordination w/district 1 PLC 915 Methods 2 1 Management 1 Supervision 2 PACT Assess Course (TE903) 1 Ed 451 1 Weaknesses PACT 2 1 Contradictory info 1 Need more foundations 1 Doing Too Much/Too many units 3 1 Lack Faculty Communication Block-School connection 1 Need better mas.trs Students tested too much 1 1 Changes? Be more selective enrolling students 1 Step out of silos 1 Need live superv. 1 Reduce prereqs 1 1 Reduct # courses only 1 sem st tg 1 Redesign courses 1 Back to 2:1 Super 1 Attract more males 1 Supervision Use E-Supervision Don't reduce superv.x Need more research first 1 Need more teaching 1
1
Multipl
e Subjec
t
Single Subjec
t
Both MS and SS
T/T FT-L PT-L Sup T/T FT-L PT-L Sup T/T FT-L PT-L SupStrengths 1 Faculty 1 1 Much Good Blocks Theory/Practice link 1 Cohort Model 1 Block Leaders 1 Coordination w/district 1 PLC 915 Methods 2 1 Management 1 Supervision 2 PACT Assess Course (TE903) 1 Ed 451 1 Weaknesses PACT 2 1 Contradictory info 1 Need more foundations 1 Doing Too Much/Too many units 3 1 Lack Faculty Communication Block-School connection 1 Need better mas.trs Students tested too much 1 1 Changes? Be more selective enrolling students 1 Step out of silos 1 Need live superv. 1 Reduce prereqs 1 1 Reduct # courses only 1 sem st tg 1 Redesign courses 1 Back to 2:1 Super 1 Attract more males 1 Supervision Use E-Supervision Don't reduce superv.x Need more research first 1 Need more teaching 1
To Be Determined
Today
A set of responses from n individuals.
All responses to one of the last 5 questions.
To the future:
Why now?
If not now, when?
Does anyone want to think about this?
Related Documents
