Top Banner
Team Surgency Supporting time-critical combat care during mass casualty response Week 0: Problem: Developing the capability for forward deployment of robotic telesurgery in order to reduce the ‘Golden Hour’ critical time window with early surgical intervention Solution: Solve signal latency for robotic telesurgery Week 10: Problem: Addressing triage and treatment bottlenecks during mass casualty situations at a Role 1 Battalion Aid Station Solution: improve situational awareness and intra-BAS communication 90+ Interviews
43

Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Jan 21, 2018

Download

Education

Steve Blank
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Team SurgencySupporting time-critical combat care during mass casualty response

Week 0:Problem: Developing the capability

for forward deployment of robotic

telesurgery in order to reduce the

‘Golden Hour’ critical time window

with early surgical intervention

Solution: Solve signal latency for

robotic telesurgery

Week 10:Problem: Addressing triage and

treatment bottlenecks during mass

casualty situations at a Role 1

Battalion Aid Station

Solution: improve situational

awareness and intra-BAS

communication

90+ Interviews

Page 2: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Chris SebastianSoftware Engineering &

Product

Andrew DeClerckMachine Learning &

Software Engineering

Negin BehzadianAnalog Circuit Design &

Signals

Abbey CutchinTissue Engineering & Orthopedic Surgery

Mentors and Sponsors

Rafi HoltzmanDr. Steve HongAmanda Love, USAMMA

The Team

Page 3: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Who We Interviewed

58+Experts

20Users

12Buyers

Page 4: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Em

otio

nal S

tate

10

Robotic Telesurgery

?

What is the Problem?

It’s a Management

Problem!

Who is this for?

Beneficiary Buy-In

Development

Next Steps

Our Journey

Page 5: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Develop capability for robotic telesurgery that would allow

physicians to provide time-critical treatments for injured patients from

remote geographic distances.

The Original Challenge

Page 6: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

“People are scared to move a daVinci down a hallway, let alone

use it on the battlefield”- Anonymous Stanford Hospital Trauma Surgeon

Page 7: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Em

otio

nal S

tate

10

Robotic Telesurgery

?

What is the Problem?

It’s a Management

Problem!

Who is this for?

Beneficiary Buy-In

Development

Next Steps

Our Journey

Page 8: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Where can we add value?

Evacuation

Forward CarePOINT OF INJURY

Role 2

Role 3

Page 9: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Visit to 129th Rescue Wing at Moffett Airfield

Page 10: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

90%

before arrival to medical treatment facility

Page 11: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

25%

of those fatalities were deemed survivable

Page 12: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Where can we add value?

Evacuation

Forward CarePOINT OF INJURY

Role 2

Role 3

Page 13: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

“[Mass casualty triage] is not a patient care problem, it’s a management problem.”

- 129th Rescue Wing Pararescuer

Page 14: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Em

otio

nal S

tate

10

Robotic Telesurgery

?

What is the Problem?

It’s a Management

Problem!

Who is this for?

Beneficiary Buy-In

Development

Next Steps

Our Journey

Page 15: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Civilian Mass Casualty Training Simulation

Page 16: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

“It’s a waste of time to try and diagnose — it’s all about

prioritization.”- Timothy Browder, MD; Stanford Trauma Surgery

Page 17: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Justin

Roberto

Davis

Clute

Nicolas

Lozano

MVP 1.0

A Potential Solution for Automating Pre-Evacuation Mass Casualty Prioritization

Page 18: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

UWB

Network

Zephyr Vitals Sensors

Leveraging FDA-approved physiological monitoring system, already deployed in several high-stress

operational environments

Page 19: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

“The first time extensive triage takes place is at the Battalion Aid

Station.”- LtCol Hasseltine, former Commanding Officer, 2d

Battalion, 7th Marines,1st Marine Divison

Page 20: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Em

otio

nal S

tate

10

Robotic Telesurgery

?

What is the Problem?

It’s a Management

Problem!

Who is this for?

Beneficiary Buy-In

Development

Next Steps

Our Journey

Page 21: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Battalion Aid Station?

EXPECTANT

STAGING

AREA

BLACK

MEDEVAC:

Medical Officer

TRIAGE TREATMENT

INCOMING

CASUALTIES

MEDEVAC

To Role II/III

Page 22: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Current Prioritization at Battalion Aid Stations

White Board TrackingTriage Card

Page 23: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

“There is a continuous stream of communication at a BAS supporting triage, treatment, and EVAC of casualties across medical and tactical personnel. This chain could easily break down in the chaos of a

mass cal.”- MAJ Michael Holloway, former BAS Physician Assistant

Page 24: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Em

otio

nal S

tate

10

Robotic Telesurgery

?

What is the Problem?

It’s a Management

Problem!

Who is this for?

Beneficiary Buy-In

Development

Next Steps

Our Journey

Page 25: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

MVP 2.1: Triage Manager Interface

Page 26: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

MVP 2.2: Physician Assistant Interface

Page 27: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Final MVP: Evaluating Product-Mission Fit at the BAS

TRIAGE TREATMENT

CAS. INFO

INPUT:Secondary Triage

Officer

OUTPUT:Physician

Assistant

EXPECTANT

STAGING AREA

BLACK

SENSOR

INPUT:Field Medics

MEDEVAC:

Medical Officer

Page 28: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Surgency: Mission Model Canvas

- UI/UX Design MVP- Software Engineering- Interface/integrate w/ Zephyr sensors

- Purchase/support Zephyr supply

- Gain buy-in from JTS and incorporate in standard practice

- Continued sponsorship by military beneficiary

- Industry (wearable sensors, H2Care, Zephyr Technologies)

- Course faculty and staff, military liaisons, DIUx, SOFWERX, In-Q-Tel

- Problem Sponsors: USAMMA

- DoD organization with interest in medical device research (USAMRMC, TATRC, DARPA)

- Joint Trauma Registry

-Primary: Physician Assistants at Role 1 BAS

- Secondary: other BAS medical officers (i.e., triage medics), and potentially tactical officers

- Tertiary: Care providers at higher echelons of care

- Increase situational awareness: Constant vital monitoring provides PA with greater awareness of patient status.

- Improve efficiency of communication among BAS roles: Augmenting PA access to communication flow from medical officer -> PA -> Platoon Sgt for quicker, more informed decisions

- Improve efficiency of MEDEVACs from BAS: More accurate prioritization during MEDEVAC requests prevents unnecessary allocation of MEDEVACs and crew

-Medical force multiplier: With more efficient allocation of MEDEVACs, allow for increased access to shared resources between different teams.

- Improved medic-supported triage of combat injuries at POI in mass casualty situations- Widespread adoption & trust from DoD medical team and DoD command- Lives saved / Improved Quality of Care / Time to MEDEVAC / MEDEVACS sent vs patients transported

- Test case in mass casualty situation with advanced medical first responders (18D trained)

- Test case in mass casualty situation with standard combat medics

Fixed:- Software design & engineering- Robotics/Surgery Suite Costs

Variable:- Customer acquisition/sales

- USAMMA procurement /sustainment resources

- Medical Advisors

- Testing facilities

- AI/ML advisors

- Need demand signal from BAS medical officers responsible for triage, treatment, and EVAC decisions- Need execution and active use by medics and first responders at BAS-Need implementation direction from DoD leadership

Beneficiaries

Mission AchievementMission Budget/Costs

Buy-In/Support

Deployment

Value PropositionKey Activities

Key Resources

Key Partners

Page 29: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Value Propositions and Beneficiaries

Automated Continuous Monitoring

Improved Intra-BAS Communication

Increased Situational Awareness @BAS

Medical personnel at

a BAS

Care providers at higher

echelons of care

Increased Situational Awareness/Preparation at

higher Roles of Care

Tactical personnel at

a BAS

Page 30: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

“I have dozens of anecdotes of patients that have died or had poor outcomes, because the number of

casualties overwhelmed capability to monitor or treat...”

- LtCol DeLellis, Deputy Surgeon at the United States Army Special Operations Command

Page 31: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

“...active monitoring would likely have changed the outcome, for

the better, for many of those patients.”

- LtCol DeLellis, Deputy Surgeon at the United States Army Special Operations Command

Page 32: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Mission Achievement:

Save lives deemed survivable, where they are often lost

Page 33: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Em

otio

nal S

tate

10

Robotic Telesurgery

?

What is the Problem?

It’s a Management

Problem!

Who is this for?

Beneficiary Buy-In

Development

Next Steps

Our Journey

Page 34: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Development - Data Entry Application

Page 35: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Development - PA Interface

Page 36: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Development - PA Interface

Page 37: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Testing our Final MVP: 23rd Marine Regiment

Page 38: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

“[The MVP] would effectively eliminate the standard 15 minute interval

between vital re-measurements by enabling continuous vitals monitoring.”

- 23rd Marine Regiment Corpsman

Page 39: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Em

otio

nal S

tate

10

Robotic Telesurgery

?

What is the Problem?

It’s a Management

Problem!

Who is this for?

Beneficiary Buy-In

Development

Next Steps

Our Journey

Page 40: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Internal Readiness Level

Prototype of low-fidelity Minimum Viable Product

Page 41: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Immediate Next Steps

Hacking for Defense

Spring 2017

Open Source GitHub

Page 42: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Where do we go from here?- Secure funding sources for further development i.e. the

AAMTI Award

- Interface with Zephyr biopatch sensors

- Work with USAMMA to develop formal requirement upon MVP screening

- Explore field testing with a unit in a frequent deployment cycle i.e. the 101st Airborne

Page 43: Surgency Hacking for Defense 2017

Acknowledgements:- USAMMA: Amanda Love, Jay Wang, Nita Grimsley- TATRC: Daniel Kral, James Beach, Nathan Fisher

- Mentors: Steven Hong, David Zinn, George Hasseltine, Seth Krummrich, Rafi Holtzman, Tammer Barkouki

- MVP Feedback: Stephen DeLellis, Jeffrey Oliver, Michael Holloway, Erwin Villeros