Top Banner
Surface Treatments & Cu Ultracleaning Enzo PALMIERI ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro UNIVERSITY OF PADUA Material Science and Engineering Dept.
114

Surface Treatments & Cu Ultracleaning

Jan 16, 2016

Download

Documents

xue

Surface Treatments & Cu Ultracleaning. Enzo PALMIERI ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro UNIVERSITY OF PADUA Material Science and Engineering Dept. The Goal: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Surface Treatments & Cu Ultracleaning

Surface Treatments & Cu Ultracleaning

Enzo PALMIERI

ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARELaboratori Nazionali di Legnaro

UNIVERSITY OF PADUA Material Science and Engineering Dept.

Page 2: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

The Goal: To lower under the detectable level the radiactive background due to the surface activity of ppb traces of U and Th on CUORE Cu frames

R&D: Search for the best sequence of Surface Treatments:

• Optimization of Chemical/Electrochemical polishing• Study of Plasma cleaning efficiency• Investigation of the Ion beam cleaning Effiiency (recontamination problem)

PRODUCTION:Surface treatments of all components (around of 5000 pieces)

Page 3: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Reiterated interactions of Milan Group with both European and Italian Industry did not achieve the desired results

Adopting commercial etching baths, the surface contamination (ppb) increased instead than decreasing

Therefore it was just the national Italian industry to propose to INFN Milan, as the only possible alternative, the surface treatments by INFN LNL for Superconducting accelerating cavities

Page 4: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 5: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 6: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 7: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 8: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 9: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 10: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 11: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 12: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 13: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 14: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 15: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 16: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 17: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 18: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 19: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 20: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 21: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 22: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 23: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 24: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

14. OUTGASSING

15. REACTIVE CLEANING: Anodic Oxidation and subsequent removal of the oxide16. OZONE CLEANING17. HYDROGEN CLEANING

1. ABRASIVE CLEANING, GRINDING and MECHANICAL POLISHING

2. SOLVENT CLEANING: Chlorofluorocarbons and Liquid CO2 3. SEMI-AQUEOUS CLEANERS: Terpenes; Alcohols; Ketones; Esters; Amines4. ULTRASONIC CLEANING5. MEGASONIC CLEANING6. SAPONIFIERS, SOAPS, AND DETERGENTS7. WIPE-CLEAN8. SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS

9. CHEMICAL ETCHING10. ELECTROCHEMICAL POLISHING11. ELECTROLESS ELECTROLYTIC CLEANING12. DEBURRING: laser vaporization, thermal pulse flash deburring13. STRIPPABLE COATINGS

18. REACTIVE PLASMA CLEANING AND ETCHING19. PLASMA CLEANING20. SPUTTER CLEANING21. ION BEAM CLEANING

THE POLISHING SYSTEM

Page 25: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

1. ABRASIVE CLEANING for removal of gross contamination

(e.g., sandpaper, emery paper, steel wool, Scotch-brite, scouring pads)

Abrasive powders wet or dry in a paste or fluid carrier entrained in a high velocity gas or liquid stream : e.g. SiC, Al2O3, diamond, CeO2, precipitated CaCO3, talc, kaolin, wheat starch. The cleanest mechanical polishing is Ice micro-droplets blasting in a high pressure liquid nitrogen stream.

Problems:• Abrasive embedding into the surface • Introduction of microcracks into the surface, • Compressive stresses introduced by a king of "shot peening"

Page 26: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

2. CHEMICAL ETCHINGChemical etching removes surface material along with strongly

adherent contaminants.

Before chemical etching, it is advisable: • Alkaline pre-clean in order to get uniform wetting and etching• Pickling i.e. the removal of the large amounts of oxides formed

during fabrication process. • Bright dip is nothing else than a Mild Pickling

Acid cleaning of metals can have the detrimental effect of introducing hydrogen into the surface. If hydrogen embrittlement is a concern, the part should be high-temperature vacuum baked after etching.

Sometimes chemical etching does not remove some constituents from a surface and leaves a smut that must be removed by further etching.

Page 27: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

4. ELECTROLESS ELECTROLYTIC CLEANING

Relies on the difference in electromotive potentials to remove material from one surface and deposit it on another. Such Displacement-type Electrolytic Cleaning process is commonly known for Silver.

When immersing Silver in an undiluted solution of pure household ammonia contained in an Al or Mg tray, the Silver surface is cleaned as the Al or Mg is oxidized.

Page 28: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

5. DEBURRINGDeburring is the removal of the rough edges produced in cutting or shearing. Deburring is performed by: abrasion, chemical etching, laser vaporization, "flash debarring" which uses a thermal pulse from an exploding gas-Oxygen mixture to heat and vaporize the thin metal protrusions.

www.elechem.net/ngt.html

It removes burrs of steel, cast iron, brass, Zinc or aluminum created due to operations such as turning, milling, broaching, grinding or die-casting. In thermal deburring, the work pieces are placed in a pressure chamber. The chamber is closed and filled with a mixture of gases, which is later ignited. Due to the instantaneous high temperature the burrs are burnt since their surface is large relative to their volume. The work pieces are moderately heated

Page 29: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

6. SOLVENT CLEANINGSolvents dissolve the contaminant taking it into solution:

i) Polar solvents, such as water and water-alcohol mixtures used to dissolve ionic salts which are polar contaminates;

ii) Non-polar solvents such as Chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents used to remove non-polar contaminates such as oil.

A mixture of solvents can dissolve both polar and non-polar contaminates.

Solvents effectiveness is determined by the Solubility Parameter for specific contaminants, that is saturation maximum amount of a specific contaminant dissolvable in a specific amount of solvent.

Page 30: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Solvent cleaning leaves a residual surface layer which must be also removed.

This removal can involve: i) water rinsing; ii) an elevated temperature; iii) other solvents that displace the surface layer.

e.g., for Cristals and frames, a solvent wipe-clean cleaning sequence might be Trichloroethylene—Acetone—Methanol—Isopropanol.

Good polar solvents for a variety of polar contaminants such as ionic salts are Water and Water-Alcohol mixtures.The addition of alcohol lowers water surface energy allowing it to penetrate into "hideouts" to remove hidden contamination. Water and water-alcohol mixtures are not good solvents for non-polar contaminants such as oils.

Page 31: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

A possible alternative to TCA is MethyleneChloride (MEC – CH2Cl2). It has a rather low PEL, but it has a boiling point of 39.8°C. It must be kept into account that MEC is a very aggressive solvent; it can damage plastics and rubbers.

Perchloroethylene is particularly suited for Cu after coming from machining. It has a high boiling point (121.1°C), is useful for dissolving heavy greases, and it can contain a large amount of water without degrading its solvency power.

Solvents can be mixed to give synergistic cleaning actions: a typical blend used for metal vapor degreasing is the Azeotrope mixture of Freon™ TF with methylene chloride or with ethanol.

Some solvents can react with the surface being cleaned. For example, Chlorinated solvents can react with water to form HCl which can react with many metals, particularly Al, Mg, Be, Zn , but also Cu and Te to form inorganic salts.

Page 32: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

7. CHLORINATED AND CHLOROFLUOROCARBON SOLVENTS

Chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents (Trichloroethylene) are preferred to hydrocarbon solvents for their lower flammability but there is concern with their toxicity and carcinogenic properties.

Chlorofluorocarbons do not have carcinogenic problems and can used in large quantities also because they are less effective then chlorinates solvents in dissolving contaminants.

1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA-CHCCl3, or methyl chloroform) is a common chlorinated solvent widely used in vapor degreasers. TCA has high Permissive Exposure Level (PEL), is classed as non-volatile, has low toxicity, but it has a high Ozone Depleting Potential (ODP) rating.

Page 33: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

9. SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS

If a gas, such as CO2, is compressed to its "critical pressure", it liquefies to become a "critical fluid". If it is also heated above its "critical temperature", it becomes a supercritical fluid.

Critical fluids and supercritical fluids are good solvents for many medium-molecular-weight, non-polar or slightly polar organics. Solubility parameter for which CO2 can vary from 0 in the gas phase to 10 under high pressure supercritical conditions (SCF-C02- critical point 31°C, 74 bar pressure). Values of 6-8 are typical.

Supercritical C02 fluid are stable; have low toxicity; minimal cost

Page 34: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

10. SEMI-AQUEOUS CLEANERS

Semi-aqueous Clenears refer to solutions of natural or synthetic organic solvents, used in conjunction with water in some part of cleaning cycle. Water immiscible semi-aqueous cleaners include: terpenes; high-molecular-weight esters; petroleum hydrocarbons; glycol esters.

Terpenes are natural hydrocarbons such as: the d-limonene; the alpha- and beta-pinenes, derived from citrus and pine oils. They may be as effective as the CFCs in many instances, but have a greater tendency to leave residues and suffer from the fact that they are slow drying.

Water miscible semi-aqueous cleaners are low-molecular-weight alcohols; ketones; esters; and organic amines. Acetone (CH3COCH3) removes heavy oils quite effectively but tends to leave a residue, that should be remnoved by a methanol rinse.

Page 35: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

12. ULTRASONIC CLEANING

Jetting action of collapsing cavitation bubbles in contact with a surface to provide a high pressure jet of fluid against the surface.

Removes loosely adhering particles after a grinding or abrasive procedure and cam. be used with solvents to remove adsorbed contaminants.

Good for removal of large particles but less efficient as the particle size decreases into the submicron range. The cavitation bubbles are formed by the tension portion of an ultrasonic wave in a fluid media and grow with time. The size that can be attained depends inversely on the frequency and the surface tension of the fluid. High frequencies (>60 kHz) give smaller bubbles and a higher bubble density.

Page 36: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Typically 18-120 kHz transducers, at energy density ~ 20 W/lt fluid

The size of cavitation bubbles in the fluid depends on the vapor pressure, surface energy, and temperature of the fluid.

E.g. pure water at 60°C and 40 kHz has a maximum cavitation bubble size of about 100 m if a surfactant is present, the bubble size is smaller due to the lowered surface energy.

Ultrasonic cleaning must be used with care on TeO2 crystals, since the jetting action can produce high pressures that cause erosion and introduce fractures in the surface

Page 37: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

13. MEGASONIC CLEANING

High frequency (>400 kHz) ultrasonic cleaning does not cause cavitation. Instead, the action consists of a train of wave fronts that sweep across a smooth surface producing disruption of the viscous boundary layers on the substrate surface by viscous drag. The resulting pressure is lower and does not hurt fragile surfaces. High frequency transducers can be focused to restrict the area of impact and allow lateral fluid flow from the area of concentration.

Megasonic cleaning utilizes high frequency (850-900 kHz) transducers to produce non-cavitating pressure waves.

Megasonic agitation system is applicable to smooth surfaces, but does not work well on configured surfaces where surface is shadowed from the pressure wave

Page 38: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

16. RINSING

After any wet cleaning process the surface should be thoroughly rinsed in pure or ultrapure liquid, usually water, before allowing to dry. This avoids leaving residues on the surface.

A common rinsing technique is to use successive rinses (cascading rinsing) in pure or ultrapure water until the rinse water retains a high resistivity (e.g., >12 megohm).

After rinsing, the surface should be dried as quickly as possible since the residual water film on the surface will cause particles to stick to the surface and on drying the particles will adhere very tenaciously.

Page 39: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

19. OZONE CLEANING

The use of oxidation by Ozone created by ultraviolet radiation at atmospheric pressure and low temperature has greatly simplified the production, storage and maintenance of hydro-carbon-free surfaces.

Historically the UV/0, cleaning process was developed because of the need to clean very delicate quartz oscillators. Any attempt to clean the quartz using physical contact caused breakage.

The short wavelength radiation causes bond scission in the hydrocarbon contaminants and generates ozone which reacts with carbon to form volatile CO and CO2.

Page 40: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

21. REACTIVE PLASMA CLEANING AND ETCHING

Reactive plasma cleaning uses a reactive species in plasma to react with the surface to form a volatile species which evaporates at much lower T than those used for reactive gas cleaning.

Oxygen or hydrogen are often used for plasma cleaning while fluorine (from SF6, CF4, CHF3, C2F6 C3F8, or SF6) and chlorine (from HCl, CCl4, or BCl3) are used for plasma etching.

Oxygen (or air) plasmas are very effective in removing hydro-carbons and absorbed water vapor from surfaces.

When plasma is etching Cu, CuCl2 residue is left on the surface which can be volatilized by heating to above 200 °C.

Page 41: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Jacquet proposed a simple mechanism for EP:Jacquet, P.A., Trans. Electrochem Soc, 69, 629, (1936)

A viscous layer of anodic dissolution products is formed:

Respect to the bulk of the electrolyte, this layer has higher viscosity and greater electrical resistivity

• The thickness of the liquid insulating layer is greater in crevices than on projections.

• The current density on projections it is higher than in crevices.• For this reason, projections dissolve more rapidly than

crevices, and this produces a surface-leveling effect.

ELECTROPOLISHING

Page 42: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Search for the best polishing conditions:

Manipulation of film build-up conditions in micro-EPP. J. LeeApplied Superconducting Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison

P. J. Lee, Proc. Microscopy &Microanalysis ’96, Bayley et al, p.1028; UW-ASC publ. 357

EP can be broken down in 2 different processes: Macro-EP and Micro-EP

Great care must be paied for stable and controlled EP conditions. This is sometime impossible for multi-phase/elements materials.

A new method: periodic cycles of macro-EP and micro-EP by a right balancement of film dissolution and film creation.

Rapid oscillations from low current regimes (where there is a film build-up) to high current regimes (where there is film removal)

Page 43: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Automatic control of plateau by locking on the minimum of differential conductivity

V. Palmieri, S. Stark, F. Stivanello, INFN-LNL

(proceedings of Tsukuba SRF 2001)

The I-V Polarization curve and its derivative are computer monitored

The working point is chosen as the minimum of the differential conductance of the bath, that corresponds to the point of maximum resistance of the viscous layer

Page 44: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

The I-V characteristic evolves with time

10

15

20

25

30

35

2 3 4 5 6 7

1 min

3 min

6 min

10 min

20 min

36 min

80 min

I [

A]

V [V]

6

8

10

12

14

16

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

time [min]

V

[V]

I [A]

The voltage value corresponding to the minimum of differential conductance and the relative current value

Page 45: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

dI/dVI

I [

A]

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

V [V]

I/V

I-V characteristic for a Copper cavity (circles); Plot of the dI/dV

(continuous line) and of I/V (shaded line) versus voltage

Page 46: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

: Typical table displayed on the computer screen controlling the electropolishing processes. The curve on the top left is the I-V characteristics; the curve on the bottom left is the derivative of current versus voltage. The numbers on the top-right are the process parameters; the knobs at the bottom-right are needed for settling the starting point

Page 47: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Copper Frames

Surface Cleaning of CUORE Components

TeO2 Crystals

• Tumbling

• US degreasing

• Electropolishing

• US Rinsing

• Chemical Polishing

• Passivation

• US Rinsing

• Plasma Cleaning

• Ion Gun Cleaning

• Plasma Cleaning

• Ion Gun Cleaning

Total Amount of people working at the moment:

• V. Palmieri• F. Stivanello • G. Keppel• V. Rampazzo• P. Menegatti • R. Baracco

Page 48: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

22. PLASMA CLEANING

Page 49: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 50: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

PLASMA Cleaning

Page 51: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 52: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

ION BEAM Cleaning

Page 53: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 2,0 2,2

6,0 x 10-4 mbar

1,35 x 10-3 mbar

3,5 x 10-4 mbar

7,5 x 10-4 mbar

I ( mA )

1,2 x 10-4 mbar

V ( kV )

I = Vn

Page 54: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Arc Plasma Cleaning

Page 55: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Magnetron Etching

Page 56: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Etching (ECR)

Page 57: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Nevertheless the ion source has shown to be reliably working, we suspect the extraction of iron ions with the beam and a consequent contamination of the eventual irradiated sample.

Page 58: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

T – Mechanical barrel polishing by TumblingE – Removal of ~100 micron by Electropolishing

C – Removal of ~ tenths of microns by Chemical EtchingM – Removal of few microns by Magnetron Sputtering in UHVI – Removal on nanometric scale by Ion Beam Cleaning in UHV

COPPER SURFACE ULTRACLEANING:

Type of processes proposed by INFN-LNL

CUORICINO Recipe CUORE Proposal

T+C T+E+C+M (+I ? at LNGS)

Page 59: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 60: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 61: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 62: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Magnetron Etching

Page 63: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

ICPMS• Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

• The detectable threshold is of the order of ppb, and in some cases of even the ppt

It is the most sensible technique one can find

Page 64: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 65: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 66: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 67: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 68: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 69: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

LA-ICPMSLA: Laser Ablation:

• Absence of dissolving media (e.g. nitric acid)

• Spatial Resolution up to 10m

• Matrix effect and problems due to the Laser-Matter interaction: hence it is not trivial to convert from “counting” to the “atomic fraction”.

Page 70: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 71: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 72: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 73: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 74: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 75: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 76: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 77: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 78: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 79: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 80: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 81: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 82: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 83: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 84: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 85: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 86: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

LASER ablation rangeTime :40 seconds

Frequenzcy :2 spot/sec

Energy: 9 j/cm2

Scanning rate: 200 m/s

Page 87: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Different surface finishing

Different LASER absorbtion

Different Cu evaporation rate

We need to detect the spot morphology

Page 88: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Topography AFM (Scan area 60x60 m)

60 m

AFM 3D

Optical Microphotography

AFM Cu after Electropolishing

Condizioni di processoElettropolishing 50’Eroded thickness: 50 m

Page 89: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

60 m

AFM 3D

AFM Cu after tumbling Al2O3

Condizioni di processoMateriale: coni di alluminaTempo di Buratto: 72hSpessore eroso: 10 m

Topografia AFM (Scan area 60x60 m)

Microfotografia ottica

Page 90: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

60 m

Condizioni di processo:Elettropulitura : 50 min. Etching chimico: 5 min.Spessore eroso: 50 m + 7.5 m

AFM 3D Topografia AFM

(Scan area 60x60 m)

Microfotografia ottica

AFM Cu after E+C

Page 91: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

LASER ablation spot on Cu T

80 m

Condizioni di processoTumbling media: Al lensesTumbling time: 85hEroded thickness: 9,5 m

Computing the eroded volume:Average depth of the crater is higher than the zero the AFM tip does not enter into the hole We suppose that the quantity of Cu over the zero is equal to the one eroded Hence the Estimated Deep: 441 nm

Page 92: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

LASER ablation spot on Cu TEC

80 m

Condizioni di processoTumbling media: Al lensesT: 85h + E: 50’ + C: 5’Eroded: 10,2 m + 12,2 m + 31,5 m

Computing the eroded volume:Average depth of the crater is higher than the zero the AFM tip does not enter into the hole We suppose that the quantity of Cu over the zero is equal to the one eroded

Hence the Estimated Deep: 15 nm

Page 93: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

LASER ablation spot su Cu TECM

80 m

Process conditionsTumbling media: Al lensesT: 85h + E: 50’ + C: 5’ + M: 120’Eroded: 16 + 12,8 + 32 + 14,4 m

Computing the eroded volume:Average depth of the crater is higher than the zero the AFM tip does not enter into the hole We suppose that the quantity of Cu over the zero is equal to the one eroded Hence the Estimated Deep: : 97nm

Page 94: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Analisi dati LA-ICPMSAcquisizione dei dati.In questa fase è di critica importanza non contaminare il campione (ppt)

Integrazione delle curve (Origin, Kaleidagraph)

Normalizzazione dei conteggi totali per i vari campioni a partire dal volume di rame eroso, che varia a seconda della finitura superficiale (misurato grazie a AFM)

Conversione da conteggi a frazione atomica (parti per miliardo). Questa operazione non è stata ancora effettuata

Page 95: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

A

B

C

A

B

B

B

B AAA CCCC

T+C T+E+C T+E+C+M T+C’

T = TumblerC = Chemical etchingE = ElectropolishingM = Plasma cleaning

Page 96: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

BA C

B

A

C

BA C

B

A

C

B

A

C

T+C T+E+C T+E+C+M T+C’

T = TumblerC = Chemical etchingE = ElectropolishingM = Plasma cleaning

Page 97: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

AFM Imaging of a crater obtained by a single laser shot

Page 98: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

0.1

1

112111.8111.6111.4111.2111 without solution

nT /(

Hz)

1/2

Hz

WARNING: this graph has nothing to do with CUORE and with the LA-ICPMS. It only helps in explaining that obviously a trend gives More infos than a single point

Page 99: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 100: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

64 spot; 8,8J/cm2; ≈ 3,3μm

Page 101: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

128 spot; 9J/cm2; ≈ 4 μm

Page 102: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

256 spot; 9J/cm2; 16.4 μm

Page 103: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

512 spot; 9J/cm2; 63.1 μm

Page 104: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

1000 spot; 9J/cm2; 115 μm

Page 105: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

1000 spot; 8,5 J/cm2; 95,9 μm

Page 106: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 107: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 108: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

VSpot = 120 n ± 3 m3

Page 109: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

(T+C) (T+E+C) (T+C+E+M)

Sample (T+C): There are the 5 lines of 10 craters of increasing depth (white spots) respectively made by 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256 e 512 laser spots. The crater sizes are proportional to the number of laser spots. Sample (T+C+E): It is dysplayed the area scanned by the laser meanwhile acquiring. Sample (T+C+E+P): The red frame shows the crater lines, while the green frame shows the area scanned for a 2D map.

Page 110: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Cou

ntin

gs

Time

LA-ICP-MS signal for a single line of craters of higher and higher depth

T+E+C+M

Page 111: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 112: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning
Page 113: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning

Line Number

Cou

ntin

gs

CUORICINO

CUORET+E+C+M

Page 114: Surface Treatments &  Cu Ultracleaning