Top Banner
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings Tennessee Department of Education Elementary School Mathematics Grade 4
33

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Feb 23, 2016

Download

Documents

Ciro Pascarella

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings. Tennessee Department of Education Elementary School Mathematics Grade 4. Rationale. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings

Tennessee Department of EducationElementary School MathematicsGrade 4

Page 2: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Rationale

There is wide agreement regarding the value of teachers attending to and basing their instructional decisions on the mathematical thinking of their students (Warfield, 2001).

By engaging in an analysis of a lesson planning process, teachers will have the opportunity to consider the ways in which the process can be used to help them plan and reflect, both individually and collectively, on instructional activities that are based on student thinking and understanding.

Page 3: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

3© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Session Goals

Participants will:

• learn to set clear goals for a lesson;

• learn to write essential understandings and consider the relationship to the CCSS; and

• learn the importance of essential understandings (EUs) in writing focused advancing questions.

Page 4: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

4© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Overview of Activities

Participants will:

• engage in a lesson and identify the mathematical goals of the lesson;

• write essential understandings (EUs) to further articulate a standard;

• analyze student work to determine where there is evidence of student understanding; and

• write advancing questions to further student understanding of EUs.

Page 5: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

TASKS

as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials

TASKS

as set up by the teachers

TASKS

as implemented by students

Student Learning

The Mathematical Tasks Framework

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000

Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project

Page 6: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

TASKS

as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials

TASKS

as set up by the teachers

TASKS

as implemented by students

Student Learning

The Mathematical Tasks Framework

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000

Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project

Setting Goals Selecting TasksAnticipating Student Responses

Orchestrating Productive Discussion• Monitoring students as they work• Asking assessing and advancing questions• Selecting solution paths• Sequencing student responses• Connecting student responses via Accountable

Talk® discussionsAccountable Talk® is a registered trademark of the University of Pittsburgh

Page 7: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

7© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Solving and Discussing Solutions to the Thirds and Sixths Task

Page 8: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

8© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

The Structure and Routines of a Lesson

The Explore Phase/Private Work TimeGenerate Solutions

The Explore Phase/Small Group Problem Solving

1. Generate and Compare Solutions2. Assess and Advance Student Learning

Share, Discuss, and Analyze Phase of the Lesson1. Share and Model2. Compare Solutions3. Focus the Discussion on Key

Mathematical Ideas 4. Engage in a Quick Write

MONITOR: Teacher selects examples for the Share, Discuss,and Analyze phase based on:• Different solution paths to the same task• Different representations• Errors • Misconceptions

SHARE: Students explain their methods, repeat others’ ideas, put ideas into their own words, add on to ideas, and ask for clarification.REPEAT THE CYCLE FOR EACH

SOLUTION PATHCOMPARE: Students discuss similarities and difference between solution paths.FOCUS: Discuss the meaning of mathematical ideas in each representationREFLECT: Engage students in a Quick Write or a discussion of the process.

Set Up the TaskSet Up of the Task

Page 9: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

9© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Thirds and Sixths: Task Analysis

• Solve the task. Write sentences to describe the mathematical relationships that you notice.

• Anticipate possible student responses to the task.

Page 10: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

10© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Thirds and Sixths

Joel looks at the picture below and says, “I see of the picture is shaded.”

Sammy says, “No, of the picture is shaded.”

Who is correct? Write addition and multiplication equations to prove your answer.

Page 11: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

11© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Thirds and Sixths: Task Analysis

• Study the Grade 4 CCSS for Mathematical Content within the Number and Operations – Fractions domain.

Which standards are students expected to demonstrate when solving the fraction task?

• Identify the CCSS for Mathematical Practice required by the written task.

Page 12: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

The CCSS for Mathematical Content − Grade 4

Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 30, NGA Center/CCSSO

Number and Operations – Fractions 4.NFExtend understanding of fraction equivalence and ordering.

4.NF.A.1 Explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n x a)/(n x b) by using visual fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate equivalent fractions.

4.NF.A.2 Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.

Build fractions from unit fractions by applying and extending previous understandings of operations on whole numbers.

4.NF.B.3 Understand a fraction a/b with a > 1 as a sum of fractions 1/b.

4.NF.B.3a Understand addition and subtraction of fractions as joining and separating parts referring to the same whole.

Page 13: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

The CCSS for Mathematical Content − Grade 4

Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 30, NGA Center/CCSSO

Number and Operations – Fractions 4.NFBuild fractions from unit fractions by applying and extending previous understandings of operations on whole numbers.

4.NF.B.4 Apply and extend previous understandings of multiplication to multiply a fraction by a whole number.

4.NF.B.4a Understand a fraction a/b as a multiple of 1/b. For example, use a visual fraction model to represent 5/4 as the product 5 × (1/4), recording the conclusion by the equation 5/4 = 5 × (1/4).

4.NF.B.4b Understand a multiple of a/b as a multiple of 1/b, and use this understanding to multiply a fraction by a whole number. For example, use a visual fraction model to express 3 × (2/5) as 6 × (1/5), recognizing this product as 6/5. (In general, n × (a/b) = (n × a)/b.)

4.NF.B.4c Solve word problems involving multiplication of a fraction by a whole number, e.g., by using visual fraction models and equations to represent the problem. For example, if each person at a party will eat 3/8 of a pound of roast beef, and there will be 5 people at the party, how many pounds of roast beef will be needed? Between what two whole numbers does your answer lie?

Page 14: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

The CCSS for Mathematical Practice

1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.

2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.

3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

4. Model with mathematics.

5. Use appropriate tools strategically.

6. Attend to precision.

7. Look for and make use of structure.

8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 6-8, NGA Center/CCSSO

Page 15: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

15© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Common Core Content Standards and Mathematical

Practice StandardsEssential Understandings

The Common Core State Standards

Page 16: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Mathematical Essential Understanding(Fractional Equivalence)

4.NF.A.1 Explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n x a)/(n x b) by using visual fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate equivalent fractions.

Objective Essential UnderstandingStudents will explain with words and diagrams why two fractions are equivalent.

When you multiply a fraction by a fraction equivalent to one, the denominator is partitioned into a new designated number of pieces that are smaller in size, but larger in the number of pieces than the original and as a result of the partitioning, all of the pieces referenced by the numerator end up being partitioned, too.

Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 30, NGA Center/CCSSO

Page 17: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Mathematical Essential Understanding(Adding Iterations of a Unit Fraction)

4.NF.B.3 Understand a fraction a/b with a > 1 as a sum of fractions 1/b.

Objective Essential UnderstandingStudents will recognize that adding unit fractions gives you a non-unit fraction.

Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 30, NGA Center/CCSSO

Page 18: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Mathematical Essential Understanding(Multiplying Iterations of a Unit Fraction)

4.NF.B.4a Understand a fraction a/b as a multiple of 1/b. For example, use a visual fraction model to represent 5/4 as the product 5 × (1/4), recording the conclusion by the equation 5/4 = 5 × (1/4).

Objective Essential Understanding

Students use multiplication of a unit fraction to derive a non-unit fraction.

Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 30, NGA Center/CCSSO

Page 19: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Mathematical Essential Understanding(Equivalent Unit Fraction Expressions)

4.NF.B.4b Understand a multiple of a/b as a multiple of 1/b, and use this understanding to multiply a fraction by a whole number. For example, use a visual fraction model to express 3 × (2/5) as 6 × (1/5), recognizing this product as 6/5. (In general, n × (a/b) = (n × a)/b.)

Objective Essential Understanding

Students will write equivalent multiplication expressions to represent the same value.

Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 30, NGA Center/CCSSO

Page 20: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Essential UnderstandingsEssential Understanding CCSS

When creating equivalent fractions, all of the pieces in a whole are subdivided or partitioned, thus the amount of pieces named in the numerator are automatically partitioned in the same way. What is created is an equivalent fraction.

4.NF.A.1

When you multiply a fraction by a fraction equivalent to one, the denominator is partitioned into a new designated number of pieces that are smaller in size, but larger in the number of pieces than the original and as a result of the partitioning of the denominator, all of the pieces referenced by the numerator end up being partitioned, too.

4.NF.A.2

Iterating a unit fraction is an interpretation of a fraction that illustrates the equal parts that the fraction is composed of ( = + + or 3 x , = 5 x ).

4.NF.B.3

When decomposing a fraction into iterations of the unit fraction, the number of iterations is the same as the value of the numerator.

4.NF.B.4

When “a” identical things are divided into “b” equal parts, each of “a” things contributes 1/b. So, a x 1/b = a/b. (NCTM Essential Understandings, 2011)

4.NF.B.4b

Page 21: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

21© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Asking Advancing Questions that Target the Essential

Understanding

Page 22: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh 22

TargetMathematical

Goal

Students’ Mathematical Understandings

Assess

Page 23: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh 23

TargetMathematical

Goal

A Student’s Current Understanding

Advance

MathematicalTrajectory

Page 24: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh 24

Target Mathematical Understanding

Illuminating Students’ Mathematical Understandings

Page 25: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh 25

Characteristics of Questions that Support Students’ Exploration

Assessing Questions• Based closely on the

work the student has produced.

• Clarify what the student has done and what the student understands about what s/he has done.

• Provide information to the teacher about what the student understands.

Advancing Questions• Use what students have

produced as a basis for making progress toward the target goal.

• Move students beyond their current thinking by pressing students to extend what they know to a new situation.

• Press students to think about something they are not currently thinking about.

Page 26: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

26© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Supporting Students’ Exploration(Analyzing Student Work)

Analyze the students’ group work to determine where there is evidence of student understanding.

What advancing questions would you ask the students to further their understanding of an EU?

Page 27: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Essential UnderstandingsEssential Understanding CCSS

When creating equivalent fractions, all of the pieces in a whole are subdivided or partitioned, thus the amount of pieces named in the numerator are automatically partitioned in the same way. What is created is an equivalent fraction.

4.NF.A.1

When you multiply a fraction by a fraction equivalent to one, the denominator is partitioned into a new designated number of pieces that are smaller in size, but larger in the number of pieces than the original and as a result of the partitioning of the denominator, all of the pieces referenced by the numerator end up being partitioned, too.

4.NF.A.2

Iterating a unit fraction is an interpretation of a fraction that illustrates the equal parts that the fraction is composed of ( = + + or 3 x , = 5 x ).

4.NF.B.3

When decomposing a fraction into iterations of the unit fraction, the number of iterations is the same as the value of the numerator.

4.NF.B.4

When “a” identical things are divided into “b” equal parts, each of “a” things contributes 1/b. So, a x 1/b = a/b. (NCTM Essential Understandings, 2011)

4.NF.B.4b

Page 28: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

28© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Group A

Page 29: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

29© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Group B

Page 30: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

30© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Group C

Page 31: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

31© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Group D

Page 32: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

32© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Group E

Page 33: Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning

33© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh

Reflecting on the Use of Essential Understandings

How does knowing the essential understandings help you in writing advancing questions?