10/23/19 1 Quality Assurance Supporting Innovation and Collaboration Presentation to the Iowa Association of Colleges for Teacher Education October 25, 2019 Ames, Iowa Mark LaCelle-Peterson, President/CEO Association for Advancing Quality in Educator Preparation Always improving together 1 What’s the point of national accreditation? 1. Where did AAQEP come from and how has it developed? 2. Why bother? Who can benefit from national accreditation? 3. What are AAQEP’s Standards and evidence requirements? 4. Can accreditation processes support growth and innovation? 5. Questions and conversation Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org /IACTE-Oct19 2
30
Embed
Supporting Innovation and Collaboration · 2019-10-23 · 10/23/19 1 Quality Assurance Supporting Innovation and Collaboration Presentation to the Iowa Association of Colleges for
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
10/23/19
1
Quality Assurance Supporting Innovation and Collaboration
Presentation to the Iowa Association of Colleges for Teacher EducationOctober 25, 2019Ames, Iowa
Mark LaCelle-Peterson, President/CEOAssociation for Advancing Quality in Educator Preparation
Always improving together
1
What’s the point of national accreditation?
1. Where did AAQEP come from and how has it developed?
2. Why bother? Who can benefit from national accreditation?
3. What are AAQEP’s Standards and evidence requirements?
4. Can accreditation processes support growth and innovation?
5. Questions and conversation
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
Where did AAQEP come from?The Association for Advancing Quality in Educator Preparation was founded in 2017 by professionals in educator preparation, both campus-based and state-authority-based, to ensure quality educator preparation through collaboration and innovation.
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
3
43 individuals:
v34 faculty, deans, coordinators
v2 PK-12 educators
v4 reps from 3 SEAs (HI, MI, UT)v3 AAQEP initial staff
v39 institutions in 14 states
Working in three groups: Expectations, Process, Consistency
4
Renewing a conversation—2017
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
VISIONExcellent, effective, innovative educator preparation that is committed to evidence-based improvement, engages with the P-20 system, and holds high public confidence.
MISSIONTo promote and recognize quality educator preparation that strengthens the education system’s ability to serve all students, schools, and communities.
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
8
AAQEP’s Operating Principles
in Practice
• Promote provider collaboration through cohorts• Focus on improvement and innovation with standards• Partner with providers and state authorities (duh!)• Recognize significance of context and mission in
reporting expectations and site visit protocols• Serve all providers and all types of programs equitably• Seek efficiencies everywhere (that’s for you, deans!)• Share ideas and innovations broadly with permission
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
Program completers perform as professional educators with the capacity to support success for all learners.
26Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
26
Standard 1 — Candidate/Completer Performance
Program completers perform as professional educators with the capacity to support success for all learners
Candidates and completers exhibit the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions of competent, caring, and effective professional educators. Successful candidate performance requires knowledge of learners, context, and content. Candidates demonstrate the ability to plan for and enact and/or support instruction and assessment that is differentiated and culturally responsive.
27Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
Content/pedagogical/professional knowledge (relevant to license)
Learners / learning theory, including SEL
Cultural competence
Assessment and data literacy
Positive learning/work environment
Professional dispositions/behaviors
Each standard includes six aspects of performance or practice that must be part of the evidence set. Evidence for each standard is judged holistically.
28
Standard 1 — Candidate/Completer PerformanceEvidence for this standard will include:•multiple measures, •multiple perspectives, including
program faculty, p-12 partners, program completers, graduates’ employers,
• direct measures, and evidence of • performance in clinical setting appropriate to program
Note that the evidence includes in-program & post-program measures.29
29
10/23/19
12
Standard 2Completer Professional Competence and Growth: Aspects and Evidence
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
30
Standard 2: Completer Professional Competence and Growth
Program completers adapt to working in a variety of contexts and
grow as professionals.
31Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
Standard 2 — Completer ProfessionalCompetence and Growth
Program completers adapt to working in a variety of contextsand grow as professionals.
Program completers engage in professional practice in educational settings and show that they have the skills and abilities to do so in a variety of additional settings and community/cultural contexts.
For example, candidates must have broad and general knowledge of the impact of culture and language on learning, yet they cannot, within the context of any given program, experience working with the entire diversity of student identities, or in all types of school environments.
32
32
Aspects of Standard 2 (dimensions of the whole)
33
Evidence of Completer Professional Competence and Growth
Engage local school and cultural community, caregivers and familiesCulturally responsive practice with diverse learnersCan develop productive learning environments in diverse contextsSupport their P12 students’ increasing global perspectivesGrow professionally throughout their careersCollaborate for professional learning with colleagues
Each standard includes six aspects of performance or practice that must be part of the evidence set. Evidence for each standard is judged holistically.
33
10/23/19
14
Standard 2 — Completer ProfessionalCompetence and Growth
Evidence for this standard will show that program completers:
• have engaged successfully in relevant professional practice,
• are equipped with strategies and reflective habits that enable them to serve effectively in a variety of educational settings appropriate to the credential or degree sought,
• have, in fact, done so—using whatever evidence can be gathered.34
34
Thinking About EvidencePotentially Overlapping Evidence: Expectations for Standards 1 and 2
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
Evidence Requirements and PrioritiesMultiple measures with reasonable continuity
Quality of evidence must be investigated and shared
Priority is given to direct performance measures
Down-stream data valued for improvement purposes
Differentiation of evidence by initial, advanced, etc.
Assessments appropriate to program (not necessarily across all)
36
Evidence for Standards 1 and 2
37
Completer Performance
Fundamental Expectations:Comprehensive Evidence to Assess Quality Holistically
Standard 1: Candidate/Completer PerformanceContent/pedagogical knowledge Learners / learning theory, including SELCultural competence/ Culturally responsiveAssessment and data literacyPositive learning/work environmentProfessional dispositions/behaviors
Contextual Challenges:Compelling Evidence to
Guide and Inform
Standard 2: Completer Professional Competence & GrowthEngage local community, caregivers and familiesCulturally responsive practice w diverse learnersDevelop productive environments in diverse contextsSupport P12 students’ global perspectivesGrow professionally throughout their careersCollaborate for professional learning
37
10/23/19
16
Evidence on Candidate/Completer Performance
Evidence expectations are appropriate to measure & sample
Multiple measures and perspectives, including:• Faculty (grades, assignments, dispositions clinical
ratings/evals) • P-12 partners (clinical ratings/evaluations, dispositions) • Program completers (efficacy surveys, focus groups for
information, not evaluation)• Graduates’ employers (surveys, focus groups for
information, not evaluation)
Direct measures • Evidence of performance in clinical settings
38
38
What would we like to know about our
graduates?
Did they get jobs?Were they prepared to do the work, and to grow in it?
Did they have the content and pedagogical knowledge they needed to teach effectively?
Could they create good assessments and use data from all sources to differentiate and improve their instruction?
Could they teach the diverse learners they met, and interact well with the many types of families, in many types of communities?
Did they stick with it? Are they still employed, still growing?
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
Follow-up with program completers and their employers is critically important to program improvement efforts.
Survey approaches have been found to have widely variable yield and impact. New strategies may offer greater benefits.
• Panel studies of select program completers may allow for ongoing contact and insight.
• Focus groups with local, long-term collaborators may yield better feedback and strengthen partnerships.
• Technology may afford new options in maintaining contact, getting feedback, and providing support to completers (e.g. apps, pulse surveys, online communities, LinkedIn, etc.)
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
43
Program practices: Standards 3 &4Confidence that quality will be sustained, enhanced, improved
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
Standard 3 — Quality Program PracticesThe program has the capacity to ensure
that its completers meet standards 1 and 2.
Preparation programs ensure that candidates, upon completion, are ready to engage in professional practice, to adapt to a variety of professional settings, and to grow throughout their careers. Effective program practices include: consistent offering of coherent curricula; high quality, diverse clinical experiences; dynamic, mutually-beneficial partnerships with stakeholders; and comprehensive and transparent quality assurance processes informed by trustworthy evidence. Each aspect of the program is appropriate to its context and to the credential or degree sought.
50
50
Aspects of Standard 3 (dimensions of the whole)
51
Evidence of Quality Program Practices will include
Coherent curriculum (in Appendix C)
Quality clinical experiences
Stakeholder engagement
Admission/monitoring process linked to success (Appendix A)
Capacity for quality and institutional commitment (Appendix C)
Each standard includes six aspects of performance or practice that must be part of the evidence set. Evidence for each standard is judged holistically.
51
10/23/19
22
Standard 4Program Engagement: Setting Agendas and Engaging Partners
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
52
Standard 4: Program Engagement in System Improvement
Program practices strengthen the P-20 education system in light of local
needs and in keeping with the program’s mission.
53Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
Standard 4 — Program Engagement inSystem Improvement
Program practices strengthen the P20 education system in light of local needs and in keeping with the program’s mission.
The program is committed to and invests in strengthening and improving the education profession and the P20 education system. Each program’s context (or multiple contexts) provides particular opportunities to engage the field’s shared challenges and to foster and support innovation. Engagement with critical issues facing the field is essential and must be contextualized. Sharing results of contextualized engagement and innovation support the field’s collective effort to address education’s most pressing challenges through improvement and innovation.
54
54
Aspects of Standard 4 (dimensions of the whole)
55
Evidence of Program Engagement in System Improvement
Engages stakeholders to support schools and reduce disparitiesSupports diverse educator workforce and address state and local needsSupports completer career entry and growth (Appendix B)Uses available evidence on completers for program improvementMeets relevant regulatory requirements (general, and Appendix E)Investigates effectiveness vis-à-vis institutional mission (Appendix F)
Each standard includes six aspects of performance or practice that must be part of the evidence set. Evidence for each standard is judged holistically.
55
10/23/19
24
Process elementsClear communication through cohorts, timely formative support through proposals
Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
56
Familiar Accreditation Fundamentals
57
ProcessSelf-study is the heart of quality
assurance and improvement
Peer review provided in off- and on-site reviews
DecisionsAccreditation decisions rely on
professional judgment
Full accreditation term of 7 years, but decisions may include identification of
• AAQEP liaisons provide continuity in communication and support
• Proposal process provides feedback and clarifies expectations
Support quality
assurance review process
59
59
Process Distinctives: Cohorts and Liaisons
60
• provide a supportive learning community
• foster a shared, collaborative space
Cohort calls serve to:
• facilitate monthly calls• provide AAQEP updates and
continuous support
Liaisonsserve to:
60
10/23/19
26
Brief overview of the provider and its context
Measures to be used for Standards 1
& 2
Studies of measures’
validity, reliability, fairness
Description of context
and of any innovations
The Proposal: 4 Key Components
AAQEP’s proposal process allows providers to examine processes and data, develop strategies to address challenges, receive feedback, and contribute to their case
record.
61
Process Distinctive: the Proposal
How is the proposal reviewed and what role does it play?• Peer reviewers provide 1 or 2 rounds of feedback
• Written feedback is provided using a common review framework• Follow-up conversations may be arranged for
discussion or to respond to feedback• AAQEP reviews final proposal for completeness• Proposal and summary of feedback becomes part of case
record
62
62
10/23/19
27
Abbreviated Process Timeline
63
Upon joining 24-36 months prior to site visit
6 monthsprior to site visit
2 monthsprior to site visit
Assigned to cohort and
liaison
OPTIONAL proposal provided, feedback
exchanged
Quality Assurance
Report turned in
Off-site virtual review
site visit
63
Getting Started with AAQEPAAQEP members have valued:• Support offered through workshops, consultation, cohorts• Local workshops that allow team participation/collaboration• Cohort participation which provides monthly, responsive support• Current members willingness to share experiences and advice• Capacity for training site visitors and scheduling that is in place• Staff experience in educator prep, accreditation, and state policy
68Slides and more good stuff available at: www.aaqep.org/IACTE-Oct19
AAQEP benefits to providers•Challenging, context-sensitive standards•Participation in a collaborative national conversation• Engagement with peer institutions through cohorts• Early feedback through the proposal process•Access to qualified and responsive staff•Consistency across reviews and reviewers•No-cost partnership with state (free state access)
69
76Registration Now Open76
10/23/19
29
Follow AAQEP on Social Media
77
twitter.com/aaqep1
linkedin.com/company/aaqep
77
What more would you like to know? Questions and discussion: Quality assurance and collaboration
78
10/23/19
30
Questions?
79
• Visit www.aaqep.org for updates and events• Questions or ideas?