Agricultural producer support in India in 1995-2013 and the rules of the WTO Lars Brink IAMO Forum 2014: The rise of the ‘emerging economies’: Towards functioning agricultural markets and trade relations? Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO) Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA) International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC) 25-27 June 2014, Halle (Saale), Germany [email protected]
Estimates of AMSs (Aggregate Measurements of Support, a WTO indicator) for rice, wheat, cotton and sugarcane. Years 1995-2013. Four reference price scenarios, two eligible production scenarios. Discusses India's methods in relation to WTO Agreement on Agriculture and its limits on certain support. Highlights questions and answers in Committee on Agriculture. Relates to 2013 WTO Bali decision on exceeding limits through acquisition at administered prices. Provides complete data for AMS calculations (prices, production, procurement, etc.) for 1995-2013.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Agricultural producer support in India in 1995-2013 and
the rules of the WTO
Lars Brink
IAMO Forum 2014: The rise of the ‘emerging economies’: Towards functioning agricultural markets and trade relations?Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO)Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA)International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC)25-27 June 2014, Halle (Saale), Germany [email protected]
– Support from domestic measures only • General services, payments, subsidies, administered prices
• Not border measures: tariffs, export subsidies, etc.
– Two kinds of domestic support• Not limited: green box, blue box, Article 6.2
• Limited: everything else
– Measure support in particular ways• AMSs Aggregate Measurements of Support
– Price gap support
– Payments, subsidies
Domestic support in the WTO
Lars Brink
2
– 1986-88 submission AGST
• Establishes data and methods for later notifications
• Price gaps in 19 product-specific AMSs– Administered prices INR/tonne
– Reference prices INR/tonne
• Multiply by “eligible production”: total production
• Generates WTO market price support
• All product-specific AMSs negative in 1986-88
– Latest notification for 2003
• Need for up to date information on policies and support
India’s domestic support
Lars Brink
3
– Many questions in WTO CoAg• Major issue called “notified in USD”
• Even more major issue is:
• Which reference price?– Fixed 1986-88?
– Or continually raised in proportion to currency depreciation?
– Effect of India’s new method• Raises reference price in INR/tonne, not in USD/tonne
• Result: price gap remains negative
– All product-specific AMSs negative in 1995-2003
India’s 1995-2003 notifications questioned
Lars Brink
4
– 4 crops: rice, wheat, cotton, sugarcane
– 4 price gap scenariosI. Fixed external reference price FERP in INR/tonne
II. Deflate price gap by inflation
III. Increase reference price (no longer fixed) by inflation
IV. Increase reference price (no longer fixed) by currency depreciation
– 2 eligible production scenarios• Total production
• Government procurement
32* PS AMS calculations for 1995-2013
Lars Brink
5*Effectively less than 32 AMSs because no procurement of sugarcane and negative gaps in some scenarios.
Lars Brink
6-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Price gap: rice
I: using FERP
INR/tonne
Lars Brink
7-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Price gap: rice
I: using FERP
II: Deflated gap using FERP
INR/tonne
Lars Brink
8-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Price gap: rice
I: using FERP
II: Deflated gap using FERP
III: Using inflation adjusted ERP
INR/tonne
Lars Brink
9-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Price gap: rice
I: using FERP
II: Deflated gap using FERP
III: Using inflation adjusted ERP
IV: Using INR/USD adjusted ERP
INR/tonne
– I. Fixed external reference price
• Production – AMS above 10 % of VOP for rice, wheat, cotton (some years), sugarcane
» In recent years: hugely above
• Procurement: – AMS above 10 % of VOP in recent years for rice, wheat
– II. Deflated price gap
• Production– AMS above 10 % of VOP for rice, wheat, sugarcane
• Procurement– AMS never above 10 % of VOP
Results: Scenarios I and II
Lars Brink
10
– III. Inflation-adjusted ERP• Production
– Price gap negative for rice, wheat, cotton, so AMS = zero
– But sugarcane AMS above 10 % of VOP
• Procurement– Price gap negative for rice, wheat, cotton, so AMS = zero
• No procurement of sugarcane
– IV. Currency-depreciation-adjusted ERP • Production
– Price gap not negative for rice in later years
– Significantly: rice AMS above 10 % of VOP in 2009-13
• Procurement– Rice AMS below 10 % of VOP in later years
Brink, L. 2014. Support to agriculture in India in 1995-2013 and the rules of the WTO. Working paper 14-01, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC). http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/166343/2/WP%2014-01%20Brink.pdf
Brink, L. 2014 (forthcoming). Evolution of trade-distorting domestic support. In Tackling Agriculture in the Post-Bali Context. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), E-book.
Brink, L. 2011. The WTO Disciplines on domestic support. In WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support: Seeking a Fair Basis for Trade, ed. D. Orden, D. Blandford and T. Josling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brink, L. 2009. WTO constraints on domestic support in agriculture: past and future. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(1): 1-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2008.01135.x
With grateful acknowledgement of financial support from the Global Issues Initiative of the Institute for Society, Culture and Environment, Virginia Tech