Supplementary Information Dynamic local unfolding in the serpin alpha‐1 antitrypsin provides a mechanism for loop insertion and polymerization Beena Krishnan 1 and Lila M. Gierasch 1,2 * 1 Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and 2 Department of Chemistry University of Massachusetts‐Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003 * Correspondence should be addressed to L.M.G ([email protected]) Supplementary Figures 1‐6 Supplementary Tables 1‐3 Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi:10.1038/nsmb.1976
10
Embed
Supplementary Information Dynamic local unfolding in the ... · Supplementary Information Dynamic local unfolding in the serpin alpha‐1 antitrypsin provides a mechanism
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Supplementary Figure 1. Residue packing around the positions substituted by cysteine.Neighboring residues within 1 Å of the introduced cysteine residue position (in yellowspheres) are shown (in blue spheres) on a cartoon diagram of native alpha‐1 antitrypsin(α1AT)(PDBID1QLP).
SupplementaryFigure2.Activityscreenforthecysteinevariantspresentinthecelllysate.TenµLofthesolublecelllysateobtainedfromasmallscaleproteinexpression(in20mlLB),wasdiluted3‐foldinto50mMHEPES,pH8.0containing0.1Msodiumchlorideandincubatedat37°Cfor5mbeforeadding3.5µgofporcinepancreaticelastase(Sigma)or4.0µgofbovinepancreatic trypsin (Sigma). The reaction was allowed to proceed at 37 °C for 15 m withshakingat350rpmusingtheEppendorfThermomixer,thenquenchedusingtheSDS‐PAGEgelloadingbufferandimmediatelyboiledfor5m.Thesampleswereanalyzedona10%TricineSDS‐PAGE and the covalent complex (if any) was detected by Western blot analysis. ASyngeneG:Box gel documentation systemwas used for the chemiluminescence imaging oftheWesternblot.ThelabelsP,PE,E,PT,andTindicatethebandpositionofactiveinhibitorprotein, inhibitor‐elastase complex, elastase, inhibitor‐trypsin complex, and trypsin,respectively.Thesigns'‐'and'+'belowthelanesindicatewhetherthereactionswererunintheabsenceorpresenceofprotease.Cysteinesubstitutionsatpositions288 (onstrand2C)and 366 (on strand 1C), labeled in blue, resulted in inactive protein, as indicated by theabsenceofcovalentprotease‐proteincomplexinthecelllysate.
Supplementary Figure 3. PEGylation of single cysteine α1AT mutants. RepresentativeCoomassie‐stained SDS‐PAGE results for PEGylation of the individual cysteine variants as afunctionofGdmCl.BandscorrespondingtotheproteinwithfreethiolandthePEG‐modifiedthiolare indicatedby '–SH'and '–SPEG' respectively.Positionsofmolecularweightmarkers(inkDa)areindicatedontheleftsideofthegel.
SupplementaryFigure4.PEGylationofsinglecysteine(s)inthediseasecausingZ‐variantandA‐sheetstabilizingF51Lα1AT.(a)SDS‐PAGEanalysisofPEGylationofproteinequilibrated invarying[GdmCl].TheintermediatestateofthesinglecysteineZ‐proteinwasformedfromthedenatured state, i.e., upon dilution from high (5M GdmCl) denaturant. SDS‐PAGE ofPEGylationof332Cvariantsasa functionofGdmCl (b) and the fractional thiol accessibilityobtainedfrombandintensityanalysisofdata(c)clearlyshowthestabilizingeffectoftheF51Lmutationon theA‐sheet. The lines in (c) represent the fit to a two‐stateproteinunfoldingmodel.
SupplementaryFigure5.ComparisonofPEGylationofcysteinevariantsinthe1.5MGdmCl‐inducedintermediatestateunderequilibriumandkineticallystableconditions.(a)Thesecondtransition of unfoldingα1AT is reversible, and the formation of the intermediate in 1.5MGdmClfromunfoldingnativeproteinorrefolding5.0MGdmCl‐denaturedproteiniscompletewithin5m,asindicatedbythedataforWTα1AT.(b)ThepatternofextentofPEGylationofcysteines in various positions of α1AT in the intermediate formed under equilibriumconditions is in good agreement with the intermediate generated under a kineticallycontrolled reaction. The intermediate formed in 1.5M GdmCl in the short time of 5m isaggregate‐free,ifanyaggregationweretoevenoccuratallunderthesereactionconditions.ThesedatasuggestthatthesolventaccessibilityoftheresiduesprobedbyPEGylationoftheproteinunderequilibriumconditionsreportsonthestructureofthemonomericintermediatespecies.
SupplementaryFigure6.Theα1ATintermediateispredominantlymonomericatlowproteinconcentrations. Theextentofoligomerization in2µMequilibratedsamplesofWTα1AT (a)andasinglecysteinevariant(237Cα1AT)(b)atpH7.0inthenative(N),intermediate(I,1.5MGdmCl) and unfolded (U, 4.0 or 5.0 M GdmCl) states was evaluated using glutaraldehydecross‐linking.Thecross‐linkingreactionwascarriedout foraminuteusinga500‐foldmolarexcessofglutaradehyde(Aldrich,GradeI)at25°C,followedbyquenchingwith0.2MTris,pH8.0for5m.Thereactionmixture(0.1ml)wasdilutedtoonemlwith50mMTris,pH8.0priortoTCAprecipitation.TCAprecipitated,cross‐linkedsampleswereanalyzedona10%tricineSDS‐PAGE (leftpanels),and theband intensitiescorresponding to themonomer (M),dimer(D), and higher molecular weight species (combined and referred to as A) were used toestimatetherelativefractionofeachofthespecies(bargraphs).Ascanbenotedfromthefigure, the relative fraction of dimeric protein remains constant in different [GdmCl]conditions, and likely arises from an experimental artifact introduced during TCAprecipitation, since thenativeprotein thathasnotbeensubjected to theTCAprecipitationstep is >95%monomeric (data not shown). The requirement that no reductant be addedduring the cross‐linking reaction because of interferencewith glutaraldehyde cross‐linking,mayleadtosomenon‐specificdisulfide‐mediateddimerformation.Alowerendestimateofthemonomericproteinisabout80%.Thepresenceofaggregatesasaminorspeciescannotaccountfortheobservedtrendsofsidechainaccessibilityforthevariouscysteinepositionsobservedusing thePEGylationassay.A control experiment (c) indicates that aggregation isstronglyenhancedat10‐foldhigherproteinconcentration(20µM).
a.Mutationswereintroducedintocysteine‐free(C232S)α1AT.b. The location of the residue with respect to the main secondary structural elements ofα1AT:helices(h),strands(s)insheetsA,B,orC.c.Residuesthatarewithin1Åofthevariantpositionandthestructuralelementtowhichthecontactingresiduebelongs.d.Themeanvalueofstoichiometryofinhibition(SI)determinedagainsttrypsinasdescribed[Liu,L.,etal.,Biochemistry45,10865‐10872(2006)].ThereportederrorinSIistheobservedstandarderrorfromthreeindependentmeasurements.
S381C 4.5 0.5 4.1 0.1 a.ObtainedbyfittingtheGdmClunfoldingofcysteinemutantsmonitoredbyCD(Fig.2b).Thereportedvalues for thecysteinemutantsderive from fitswith fixedmIN (‐5.67kcal/mol/M)andmUI(‐1.52kcal/mol/M).b. Estimated from the freeenergydifference (ΔΔG°)between the cysteinemutantand thewild type protein for the native to intermediate (IN) and intermediate to unfolded (UI)transitions.
a.GdmClunfoldingofcysteinemutantsmonitoredbyCD(datainFig.2b).b.Midpoints for transitions in fits of extent of cysteinemodification by PEGylation for thevariousmutants(Fig.2b).ThevaluesreportedherewereobtainedfromfittingthePEGylationdata with fixed m‐values of mIN and mUI of ‐5.67 kcal/mol/M and ‐1.52 kcal/mol/M,respectively,obtainedfromtheCDunfoldingmeasurements.