Top Banner
Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes in South African coastal habitats B Reimers, CL Griffiths and MT Hoffman African Journal of Marine Science 2014, 36(3): 387–398 http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2014.95 4618 Following paired images are arranged in sequence from west (Saldanha Bay) to east (de Hoop)
16

Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Harriet Smith
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Supplementary Appendix S1

Additional image pairs used in the following study:Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring

historical changes in South African coastal habitatsB Reimers, CL Griffiths and MT Hoffman

African Journal of Marine Science 2014, 36(3): 387–398http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2014.954618

Following paired images are arranged in sequence from west (Saldanha Bay) to east (de Hoop)

Page 2: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Langebaan Lagoon, Klein Oosterwal in 2002 (left) and in 2012 (right: both CL Griffiths).

Note disappearance of Zostera beds in recent image

Page 3: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Milnerton and Diep River Estuary – bridge to lighthouse and Woodbridge Island, in c. 1900 (Cape Archives) and in 2014 (CL Griffiths)

Page 4: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Waterfront area, Cape Town docks, in late 1800s and in 2014 (CL Griffiths)

Page 5: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Sea Point swimming pool in 1900 (Cape Town Municipality) and 2014 (CL Griffiths) – note train line!

Page 6: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Camps Bay in late 1800s (note Rotunda and power station to power trams).Same view in 2014 with Rotunda arrowed (CL Griffiths)

Page 7: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Hout Bay overview in 1950 (Hout Bay Museum) and in 2011 (CL Griffiths)

Page 8: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

The Boulders, Simon’s Town, in 1900 (Simon’s Town Museum) and in 2012 (CL Griffiths)

Page 9: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Fish Hoek from Elsie’s Peak in 1967 (V Moisey) and in 2014 (CL Griffiths).Note development of dune area behind beach

Page 10: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Kalk Bay, looking south in c. 1930s (?) prior to harbour construction and again in 2011 (CL Griffiths)

Page 11: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

‘Bishop’s Pool’ at the Brass Bell, Kalk Bay, early 1900s (postcard) and 2012 (CL Griffiths).

Note absence of kelp (arrowed) in early image

Page 12: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

St James in 1910 (M Walker) and same view in 2011 (CL Griffiths).No kelp is visible in older image but clear in 2011 (arrowed)

Page 13: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Pool area at St James in 1890s (top left: M Walker), 1950 (top right), early 1970s (below left: CL Griffiths) and in 2011 (below right: CL Griffiths)

Page 14: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Muizenberg corner c. 1910 (top left: M Walker), 1930s? (top right: M Walker),

and 2012 (left: CL Griffiths)

Page 15: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Hermanus Old Harbour c. 1900 (Old Harbour Museum) and in 2012 (B Reimers). Note lack of kelp in historic image

(cf. dense beds above and around red roofs in 2012 as arrowed)

Page 16: Supplementary Appendix S1 Additional image pairs used in the following study: Repeat photography as a tool for detecting and monitoring historical changes.

Gully at De Hoop in 1992 (left: CL Griffiths) and 2012 (right: B Reimers).Note arrival of kelps (arrow) during this interval