WT rcf2-1 A Supplemental Figure 1. Isolation of the rcf2-1 Mutant and Map-based Cloning of RCF2. (A) Increased CBF2:LUC expression in rcf2-1 plants under cold stress (4C for 20 h). (B) Induction of endogenous CBF genes in the wild type and rcf2-1. (C) Freezing tolerance of wild type and rcf2-1. WT (CA), rcf2-1 (CA), cold- acclimated (4°C for 1 week) wild-type and rcf2-1 mutant plants, respectively. (D) Expression of PRR5 in the wild type and rcf2-1 under cold stress. (E) Expression of RING-H2 Finger A1A and Agamous-like 8 in the wild type and rcf2-1 under cold stress. (F) Positional cloning of RCF2. (a) Positional cloning of RCF2. (b) Structure of the RCF2 gene. Filled boxes are exons, and lines between filled boxes are introns. Positions (relative to the start codon) of the rcf2-1 and fry2-1 mutations in RCF2 are indicated. dsRBM, double-strand RNA-binding motif; NLS, nuclear localization signal. (c) RCF2 protein structure with functional domains indicated. Drawing is not to scale. WT, wild type. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 6 in [B], [D], and [E], 12 in [C]). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Values in Supplemental Figure 1, except (F), are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented. PRR5 4C (h) CBF1 CBF2 CBF3 4C (h) B C D 0 500 1000 1500 0 3 0 3 0 3 WT rcf2-1 Relative mRNA level 0 80 160 240 320 400 0 3 12 WT rcf2-1 Supplemental Figure 1 Electrolyte leakage (%) Relative mRNA level F9F13 F21C20 T13K14 F7J7 T6K22 F18E5 F17L22 T8O5 F1N20 T10I14 F7K2 chromosome 4 SM229_155,3 FIZ4 F9F13-40K (4/1632) F7J7-47K (4/1632) F18E5-79K (2/1632) F17L22-77K (1/1632) T8O5-3K (2/1632) F1N20-48K (5/1632) F7K2-28K (7/1632) RCF2 BACS (# of recombinants /total plants) (a) (b) ATG TAA rcf2-1 (G2156A) RCF2 fry2-1 (G3218A) 1 5412 Agamous-like 8 4C (h) RING-H2 Finger A1A 0 10 20 30 40 0 12 0 12 WT rcf2-1 Relative mRNA level ab d e aa b c E F ab aa aa c d e f e g a a 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 WT rcf2-1 WT (CA) rcf2-1 (CA) Temperature (ºC) d a a e e a c c bb g f i h n h g j j mm l k l oo m n e d c b 1 967 727 791 856 924 210 386 (c) RCF2 958 967 Phosphatase catalytic domain dsRBM dsRBM NLS Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
WT rcf2-1
A
Supplemental Figure 1. Isolation of the rcf2-1 Mutant and Map-based Cloning of RCF2. (A) Increased CBF2:LUC expression in rcf2-1 plants under cold stress (4C for 20 h). (B) Induction of endogenous CBF genes in the wild type and rcf2-1. (C) Freezing tolerance of wild type and rcf2-1. WT (CA), rcf2-1 (CA), cold-acclimated (4°C for 1 week) wild-type and rcf2-1 mutant plants, respectively. (D) Expression of PRR5 in the wild type and rcf2-1 under cold stress. (E) Expression of RING-H2 Finger A1A and Agamous-like 8 in the wild type and rcf2-1 under cold stress. (F) Positional cloning of RCF2. (a) Positional cloning of RCF2. (b) Structure of the RCF2 gene. Filled boxes are exons, and lines between filled boxes are introns. Positions (relative to the start codon) of the rcf2-1 and fry2-1 mutations in RCF2 are indicated. dsRBM, double-strand RNA-binding motif; NLS, nuclear localization signal. (c) RCF2 protein structure with functional domains indicated. Drawing is not to scale. WT, wild type. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 6 in [B], [D], and [E], 12 in [C]). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Values in Supplemental Figure 1, except (F), are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
PRR5
4C (h)
CBF1 CBF2 CBF34C (h)
B
C D
0
500
1000
1500
0 3 0 3 0 3
WTrcf2-1
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
0
80
160
240
320
400
0 3 12
WTrcf2-1
Supplemental Figure 1
Ele
ctro
lyte
leak
age
(%)
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
F9F13
F21C20
T13K14
F7J7
T6K22
F18E5
F17L22
T8O5
F1N20
T10I14
F7K2
chromosome 4 SM229_155,3 FIZ4
F9F13-40K(4/1632) F7J7-47K
(4/1632)
F18E5-79K(2/1632)
F17L22-77K(1/1632)
T8O5-3K(2/1632)
F1N20-48K(5/1632) F7K2-28K
(7/1632)RCF2BACS
(# of recombinants/total plants)
(a)
(b)ATG
TAA
rcf2-1(G2156A)
RCF2fry2-1
(G3218A)
1
5412
Agamous-like 8
4C (h)
RING-H2 Finger A1A
0
10
20
30
40
0 12 0 12
WTrcf2-1
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
a b
d
ea a
b
c
E F
a b aa aa
c
d
e
f
e
g
a a0
20
40
60
80
100
0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12
WTrcf2-1WT (CA)rcf2-1 (CA)
Temperature (ºC)
da a
e e
a
c c
bb
gf
ih
nh
g
jj mm
lk
l
oomn
e
d
cb
1 967
727 791 856 924210 386
(c) RCF2
958 967
Phosphatase catalytic domain
dsRBM dsRBM NLS
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
1
WT
rcf2
-1
Abnormal transcript #1 in rcf2-1 mutant plants contains one nucleotide deletion of G at nt 1232 in the full-length wild type RCF2 coding sequence corresponding to the last nucleotide G of the 5th exon (highlighted in red color in the wild type). The frame-shifted amino acids in rcf2-1 are underlined. * indicates a stop codon.
Wild type nt 1216 AGA GGT GGA TTT TTC AGG GAT TTT GAT GAT AGT CTG CTA CCA AGG 1260 Wild type aa 406 R G G F F R D F D D S L L P R 420 rcf2-1 nt 1216 AGA GGT GGA TTT TTC AGG ATT TTG ATG ATA GTC TGC TAC CAA GGA 1260 rcf2-1 aa 406 R G G F F R I L M I V C Y Q G 420 Wild type nt 1261 ATT GCT GAA ATT TCT TAT GAG AAT GAT GCT GAG GAT ATT CCT TCT 1305 Wild type aa 421 I A E I S Y E N D A E D I P S 435 rcf2-1 nt 1261 TTG CTG AAA TTT CTT ATG AGA ATG ATG CTG AGG ATA TTC CTT CTC 1305 rcf2-1 aa 421 L L K F L M R M M L R I F L L 435 Wild type nt 1306 CCG CCT GAT GTC AGC CAT TAT TTG GTG TCG GAG GAT GAT ACA TCG 1350 Wild type aa 436 P P D V S H Y L V S E D D T S 450 rcf2-1 nt 1306 CGC CTG ATG TCA GCC ATT ATT TGG TGT CGG AGG ATG ATA CAT CGG 1350 rcf2-1 aa 436 R L M S A I I W C R R M I H R 450 Wild type nt 1351 GGT TTA AAT GGG AAC AAA GAT CCA CTT TCC TTT GAC GGG ATG GCT 1395 Wild type aa 451 G L N G N K D P L S F D G M A 465 rcf2-1 nt 1351 GTT TAA 1381 rcf2-1 aa 451 V * 452
Abnormal transcript #2
Supplemental Figure 2A B
C
Phosphatase catalytic domainWild type
rcf2-1
1
1 451
TUB8
Abnormal transcript #1rcf2-1
(G2156A)
RCF2 RT F
RCF2 RT R
RCF21551
3217
Abnormal transcript #2 in rcf2-1 mutant plants carries the entire 5th intron (in lowercase). * indicates a stop codon.
D
Supplemental Figure 2. The Nature of Two Abnormal RCF2 Transcripts in rcf2-1 Mutant Plants. (A) Positions of a pair of primers used to amplify RCF2 transcripts in wild-type and rcf2-1 plants. (B) Two abnormal RCF2 transcripts (indicated by the arrows) in rcf2-1 plants by RT-PCR analysis. TUB8 was used as a loading control. (C) The nature of abnormal transcript #1 in rcf2-1. Illustration below the sequence comparisons indicates wild-type RCF2 and truncated mutant protein in rcf2-1. (D) The nature of abnormal transcript #2 in rcf2-1. Illustration below the sequence comparisons indicates wild-type RCF2 and truncated mutant protein in rcf2-1. Translation from nucleotides (nt) to amino acids (aa) in (C) and (D) was performed with the BioEdit software (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html; Hall, 1999). dsRBM, double-strand RNA-binding motif; NLS, nuclear localization signal. Values in Supplemental Figure 2, except (A), are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
Wild type
rcf2-1 411
1
1
Phosphatase catalytic domain
Wild type nt 1216 AGA GGT GGA TTT TTC AG------------------------------------- 1232 Wild type aa 406 R G G F F R------------------------------------- 411 rcf2-1 nt 1216 AGA GGT GGA TTT TTC AGg taa gat gtc aga ttt gat aat agt agt 1260 rcf2-1 aa 406 R G G F F R * D V R F D N S S 420 Wild type nt ----------------------------------------------------------- wild type aa ----------------------------------------------------------- rcf2-1 nt 1261 ttg ttt tct tga cat ctc tac tga tca agg gtg ctt cct tag tac 1305 rcf2-1 aa 421 L F S * H L Y * S R V L P * Y 435 Wild type nt --------------------------------------------- G GAT TTT GAT 1242 Wild type aa ------------------------------------------------ D F D 404 rcf2-1 nt 1306 ata ctt acg gtg aaa tgg tat ttg aac ttg gtt aca gGG ATT TTG 1350 rcf2-1 aa 436 I L T V K W Y L N L V T G I L 450
dsRBM dsRBM
967NLS
967dsRBM dsRBM
NLS
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
Supplemental Figure 3. Gene Complementation of the rcf2-1 Mutant. (A) RCF2 expression in rcf2-1 plants expressing RCF2:RCF2-FLAG (rcf2-1 complementation plants). (B) CBF2:LUCexpression in wild-type, rcf2-1, and rcf2-1 complementation plants under cold stress (4C for 20 h). (C) Expression of CBF genes in wild-type, rcf2-1, and rcf2-1 complementation plants. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 6). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Values in Supplemental Figure 3 are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
A B
rcf2
-1
RCF2 :FLAG-FLAG+ rcf2-1 #2
RCF2:RCF2-FLAG+rcf2-1 #4
WT
CBF1 CBF2 CBF3
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
Ale
vel
4C (h)
RCF2
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
WT #2 #4RCF2:RCF2-FLAG+ rcf2-1 linesC
a
d d
b b
a
a
a
c
e
b
d g
f f f
a a a a a a a a a a a
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
3
E
WT rcf2-1
F
WT rcf2-1C24 fry2-1
Fer
tili
ty r
ate/
pla
nt
(%)
C24 fry2-1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 0.5 1
WT
rcf2-1
ABA (µM)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 50 75
WT
rcf2-1
ABA (µM)NaCl (mM)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 15 20
WT
rcf2-1
See
d g
erm
inat
ion
(%
)
See
d g
erm
inat
ion
(%
)
Roo
t el
onga
tion
(%
)T
otal
leaf
nu
mb
er
WT rcf2-10
20
40
60
80
100
120D
0
5
10
15
20
b
e
db
a a
d
b
ec
a a
c
d
c
e
a a
f
g
a
a
b
ac
b
A B C
Supplemental Figure 4. Sensitivity of rcf2-1 to NaCl and ABA, and Developmental Defects of rcf2-1 and fry2-1 Plants. (A) and (B) Seed germination rates of wild-type and rcf2-1 plants in response to various levels of NaCl (A) or ABA (B). Seeds in which the radical had emerged through the seed coat were considered germinated. There were 80–150 seeds per genotype per biological replicate. (C) Root elongation of wild-type and rcf2-1 seedlings in response to ABA. Four-d-old wild-type and rcf2-1seedlings grown on MS medium were transferred to MS medium supplemented with various levels of ABA and allowed to grow for an additional 7 d. (D) Reduced fertility of rcf2-1 and fry2-1 plants. Arrows indicate the sterile siliques. (E) Quantification of fertility of plants shown in (D). (F) Flowering time of rcf2-1 and fry2-1 plants as determined by total leaf number at flowering. Plants shown in (D)–(F) were grown under a long-day condition (16-h light/8-h darkness). Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 10 in [A] and [B], 25 in [C], and 60 in [E] and [F]). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Values in Supplemental Figure 4 are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
Supplemental Figure 4
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
Supplemental Figure 5. RCF2 Expression Profiles and Heat Stress-Responsive Gene Expression in rcf2-1 Complementation Lines. (A) Expression patterns of RCF2 in various tissues of wild-type plants. (B) Expression of RCF2 in wild-type plants under heat stress. (C) and (D) Expression of HSFA7b and HSP101 in rcf2-1 complementation lines. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 6). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Values in Supplemental Figure 5 are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
a a a a
c
a a a a
b bb b
c
bb
b
c b
a a a dc
a
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
5
A B
Su
rviv
al (
%)
C24 fry2-1
37C (h)
HSFA1b HSFC1
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel (
x 10
3 )
HSFA2 HSFA7a HSFA7b
37C (h)
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
37C (h)
HSFA4a HSFA6b HSFA6a
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 1 0 1
C24
fry2-1
37C (h)
HSFA3 DREB2C
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
37C (h)
HSFB1 HSFB2a HSFB2b
37C (h)
DREB2A HSP18 HSP70B HSP18(flowers)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 0 1 0 1
C24
fry2-1
37C (h)
HSP26.5 HSP101 HSP101(flowers)
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel (
x 10
3 )
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel (
x 10
3 )
C
D E F
G H I
Supplemental Figure 6. Effect of fry2-1 Mutation on Thermotolerance and Expression of Heat Stress-Responsive Genes. (A) Thermotolerance of C24 and fry2-1 plants. Three-week-old soil-grown plants were transferred to incubators at 21C or 37C and allowed to grow for an additional 7 d. (B) Survival rates of C24 and fry2-1 plants as shown in (A) and flowers of separate batches of 1-month-old C24 and fry2-1 plants under heat stress (37C for 4 d). Flowers that failed to produce viable siliques were considered dead. Values are mean survival rates relative to the non-stressed conditions. (C)–(I) Expression profiles of heat stress-responsive genes in 14-d-old or 1-month-old (for HSPs in flowers) C24 and fry2-1 plants subjected to heat stress at 37C for 0 or 1 h. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 80 [individual pots where C24 and fry2-1 plants were grown side-by-side] in [B]; n = 6 in [C] –[I]). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Values in Supplemental Figure 6 are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
Supplemental Figure 6
21C 37C
012345678
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
C24
fry2-1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 1 0 1
C24
fry2-1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 1 0 1 0 1
C24
fry2-1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 1 0 1 0 1
C24
fry2-1
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 0 1 0 1
C24fry2-1
0
20
40
60
80
100
Whole plants Flower
C24fry2-1
C24 fry2-1a
b b
c
a a
ce
a a
d b
a a a a a a
b
c
e
f
d d
a a
b
c
a a
e
d
a
d
c
ae
f
g
a a
ed
b
ae
a a
b
a a
c
b
c
d
e
a a a a a a a a
b
cd
e
f
g
d
e
a a a a a a
b
c c
d
c
d
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
Supplemental Figure 7. NAC019 Expression Profiles and Heat Stress-Responsive Genes in nac019 Complementation Lines. (A) NAC019 expression in different tissues of wild-type plants. (B) NAC019expression in wild-type plants subjected to heat stress. Values presented in (A [b]) and (B [b]) are from publicly available gene expression profiles as described (Kilian et al. 2007). (C) NAC019 expression levels in 14-d-old wild-type and rcf2-1 plants subjected to 37C for 0 or 1 h. (D) NAC019 expression levels in wild-type and nac019 plants. (E) NAC019 expression in nac019 plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA (nac019 complementation lines). (F) and (G) Expression of HSFA6b and HSP18 in nac019 complementation lines. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 6 except in A [b] and B [b] where n = 2). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Values in Supplemental Figure 7, except A (b) and B (b), are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
FE
D
WT nac019
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
NAC019
0
3
6
9
12
15
18NAC019
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
0
2
4
6
8
10(a) (b)
37C (h)0
1
2
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
0 0.5 1 3 4 638C (h)
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
NAC019 NAC019(a) (b)
NAC019
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
WT #2 #4NAC019:NAC019-HA+ nac019 lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
2G
b
c
b
aaa
bc
b
a
e
d
e
0
0.5
1
1.5NAC019
a
b
aa
a
a a a a
a a a a
b b b b
cc
b
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 1
WTrcf2-1
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
37C (h)
a a
c
b
NAC019C
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
Supplemental Figure 8. NAC019 Recognition Sites (CATGT) and Core Binding Sites (CACG) in the Promoter Regions of HSFA1b, HSFA6b, and HSFA7a. NAC019 recognition sites and core binding sites in promoter regions of HSFA1b, HSFA6b, and HSFA7a are highlighted in pink. Upper case bases indicate exons and lowercase bases indicate introns or promoter regions. Lowercase bases in red indicate 5- UTR (untranslated region).
HSFA1b
HSFA6b
HSFA7a
Supplemental Figure 8
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
Supplemental Figure 9. NAC019 Recognition Sites (CATGT) and Core Binding Sites (CACG) in the Promoter Regions of HSFB1 and HSFC1. NAC019 recognition sites and core binding sites in promoter regions of HSFB1 and HSFC1 are highlighted in pink. Upper case bases indicate exons and lowercase bases indicate introns or promoter regions. Lowercase bases in red indicate 5- UTR (untranslated region).
Supplemental Figure 9
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
9
Supplemental Figure 10
A
Supplemental Figure 10. Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) of Binding of NAC019 to cis Promoter Element in HSFA6b. (A) EMSA analysis showing MBP-NAC019 binding to the cis promoter elements in HSFA6b. (B) EMSA analysis showing MBP-NAC019, but not MBP-RCF2, binding to the cis promoter elements in HSFA6b. Competitor, non-biotin-labeled probe. Results in Supplemental Figure 10 are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
10
Supplemental Figure 11
HSFA1b HSFA7aHSFA6b
Fol
d ch
ange
A B
E
C
D
Supplemental Figure 11. RCF2 Is Enriched in Promoters of HSFA1b, HSFA6b, HSFA7a, and HSFC1. (A)–(E) ChIP-qPCR analyses were performed with pooled samples from 15-d-old of rcf2-1plants expressing RCF2:RCF2-FLAG (Supplemental Figure 3A); these plants were treated at 37°C for 1 h to determine whether RCF2 is enriched in the promoter regions of HSFs where NAC019 binds. Regions of amplifications in (A)–(E) are specified (positions are relative to translation start site). Amplified regions B in (A)–(E) served as negative controls. Primers used for amplifications in (A)–(E) are listed in Supplemental Table 2. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 6). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.05). Values in Supplemental Figure 11 are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
Supplemental Figure 12. Expression Levels of HSFA7b and HSP101 in rcf2-1 Plants Expressing RCF2:RCF2(D161A). (A) and (B) Expression levels of HSFA7b and HSP101 in rcf2-1 plants expressing RCF2:RCF2(D161A)-FLAG under heat stress. RCF2 (D161A), the phosphatase inactive form of RCF2. One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Results in Supplemental Figure 12 are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
Supplemental Figure 12
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
Supplemental Figure 13. Complementation of rcf2-1 with 35S:FLAG-RCF2 and Complementation of nac019 with 35S:HA-NAC019. (A) RCF2 expression level in wild-type plants expressing 35S:FLAG-RCF2. (B) NAC019 expression level in wild-type plants expressing 35S:HA-NAC019. (C) and (D) Expression of HSFA7b and HSP101 in rcf2-1 plants expressing 35S:FLAG-RCF2. (E) and (F) Expression of HSFA6b and HSP18 in nac019 plants expressing 35S:HA-NAC019. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 6). One-way ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer test) was performed and statistically significant differences are indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.01). Values in Supplemental Figure 13 are derived from experiments that were performed at least three times with similar results, and representative data from one repetition are presented.
a a a a
a a a a a a a a
a a a a
b
c
bb
b
c
bbb
c
bb b
c
bb
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
Supplemental Figure 14. Comparison of At-RCF2 and At-NAC019 with Their Close Homologs. (A) Comparison of amino acid sequences of AtNAC019 with its close homologs. The accession numbers for the aligned proteins are: AtNAC019 (Arabidopsis thaliana, NP_175697); RcNAC019 (Ricinus communis, XP_002533913); VvNAC019 (Vitis vinifera, XP_002284668 ); PtNAC019 (Populus trichocarpa, XP_002316917); PpNAC019 (Prunus persica, EMJ12761); GmNAC019 (Glycine max, NP_001238424); SlNAC019 (Solanum lycopersicum, XP_004244203); CsNAC019 (Cucumis sativus, XP_004147806); SbNAC019 (Sorghum bicolor, AFO85373); OsNAC019 (Oryza sativa Japonica Group, BAA89798); ZmNAC019 (Zea mays, ACL52720). (B) Phylogenetic tree of AtNAC019 and its close homologs. The protein identities are the same as defined in (A). (C)
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
17
Comparison of amino acid sequences of AtRCF2 with its close homologs. The accession numbers for the aligned proteins are: AtRCF2 (Arabidopsis thaliana, NP_193898); VvRCF2 (Vitis vinifera, CAN72816); PtRCF2 (Populus trichocarpa, XP_002305017); PpRCF2 (Prunus persica, EMJ15747); GmRCF2 (Glycine max, XP_003529311); SlRCF2 (Solanum lycopersicum, XP_004232844); CsRCF2 (Cucumis sativus, XP_004134718); SbRCF2 (Sorghum bicolor, XP_002452510); OsRCF2 (Oryza sativa Japonica Group, NP_001047536); RcRCF2 (Ricinus communis, XP_002519032). (D) Phylogenetic tree of AtRCF2 and its close homologs. The protein identities are the same as defined in (C). Sequence alignments in (A) and (C) were performed with ClastalW program as a part of the Bioedit package (version 7.09) with default settings (Hall, 1999) (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html). Identical or conserved amino acid residues are shaded in black or grey, respectively. Phylogenetic trees in (B) and (D) were generated with the Phylogeny.fr platform (http://www.phylogeny.fr/version2_cgi/advanced.cgi) as described (Dereeper et al., 2008). Scale bars in (B) and (D) indicate branch length.
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
18
Supplemental Table 1. Genetic Analysis of the rcf2-1 Mutant (Wild Type [Female] X rcf2-1 [Male] Cross).
Generation Seedlings Tested Wild Type rcf2-1
F1 31 31 0
F2 520 395 125 0.256 0.50 < P < 0.70
2 P Value
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
RCF2 RT F TTGGGATGAGAAGGATCAGCCGAGGGTACRCF2 RT R TACCTCACCTTCCTCTCTAGCAGGAGAACTCrcf2-1 dCAPs F ACTTACGGTGAAATGGTATTTGAACTTGGTTCCArcf2-1 dCAPs R1 TACTCCCAATCGCTAACAAGTATCACG
RCF2 SpeI F AGTCACTAGTATGTATAGTAATAATAGAGTAGAAGTGRCF2 XhoI R AGTCCTCGAGAGAGTATCTTCCCGAAGATGGCANAC019 XbaI F AGTCTCTAGAATGGGTATCCAAGAAACTGACCCGTNAC019 SpeI R AGTCACTAGTCATAAACCCAAACCCACCAACSALK096295 LP ACCGGGTTTCCGATTTTACCCGACCGATGSALK096295 RP TCTTCAGGTAGCCACAGTTGTACTCGAG
NAC019 F TCAAGACCTAACCGGGTTGCCGGATC
NAC019 R TCTCTAGCATTCGCGATTCCATTATCG
Plasmid construction of RCF2:RCF2-FLAG for ChIP assay and rcf2-1 gene complementation
Plasmid construction of 35S:RCF2-FLAG
Plasmid construction of 35S:NAC019-HA
rcf2-1 mutation genotyping PCR primers followed by digeston with ScrFI (cut WT only)
RT-PCR analysis to detect mis-splicing of RCF2 transcript in rcf2-1, and for qRT-PCR
Plasmid construction of NAC019:NAC019-HA for ChIP assay and nac019 gene complementation
qRT-PCR analysis
Plasmid construction of RCF2-nLUC for Split-LUC assay
Plasmid construction of NAC019-cLUC for Split-LUC assay
Construction of pSPYNE-RCF2 for BiFC assay
Construction of pSPYCE-NAC019 for BiFC assay
Genotyping of nac019 mutant plants
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
20
Primer Name Primer Sequence (5' to 3') Purpose
HSFA1b F TGAGCAGGAGAATCGTGGTGACAATGTGHSFA1b R CTCTACTTGAAGGGTTCCCATTGTCTACHSFA2 F GAAGGGCTTAACGAAACAGGGCCACCACHSFA2 R GATCCTTGCTGATTCACATTCTGCAAACCHSFA3 F CTTGGGGACTGACCGGAGCTAGCTTCGTAGHSFA3 R GCTAGTGCTACTGCAGCAAGTTTGGTTGHSFA4a F ATGATTCTTCATCCGATTCTATCGTCTCTTGGHSFA4a R TCATCATTCGCAAATTCCCATTGCTCAGGHSFA6a F AGAGGGTCTCAAAGAAACGCCACCAACGHSFA6a R TGTTCTTAAGAAGATGCCTCTCTCCCTTCAGHSFA6b F TCCATGGCTGAAGCAGCCATAAATGATCCHSFA6b R TGCTTGAAGAATCTGGGAAGGAGAGTTACAGHSFA7a F AACCCGTTTCTCCCGGAAGGCTGCGATCHSFA7a R TGAGAAATTGCTGTGTTTGAAATGACGAGGHSFA7b F ATGGACCCGTCGTCAAGCTCCAGAGCACGHSFA7b R TGCTTGAAGTATAGAGGCAGAATAGTGGCCGAGHSFB1 F ATACGACGGCGTAAATCGGTGATTGCHSFB1 R ACTCACTCTCTTCGTCAGACTCCACCHSFB2a F GACGCATCAAACAGTTGTTGCTCCTTCGTCHSFB2a R TCAGTGGGCTGAGATCCGACGTAATTCGACHSFB2b F CTCTCAGCCTGCTATGGCCGCGGCTGHSFB2b R GTGCAGTGGTGCAGCTCGTTGTCCTCTGHSFC1 F CTTCTCGCAACGAATCTTACCTGCTTATTTCHSFC1 R CTTGACCGTACATCCCCCGCGCGTGTTTCDREB2A F ATGGCAGTTTATGATCAGAGTGGAGATAGAAACDREB2A R TCATACAACCCTTCTTCGACCCTTTCGCAGGTACDREB2C F CTTCTTCGACTGCTGCCACTGCCACTGTGTDREB2C R TCTTTTCCTTTCAGCTCCTCTTTAATACACHSP18 F AGCAACGAACAATGTCTCTCATTCCAAGCHSP18 R AACCTTGACTTCTTCCTTCTTCAGGCCTGHSP26.5 F ACTGTCTCCTAGTTTGATGGGTCAATCTTGTGHSP26.5 R TGAAGTAGCCATGATCGTCGGTGTTACGHSP70B F AGCTATTGGTATCGATCTCGGCACTACHSP70B R AAGCCTCAGCGACTTCCTTCATCTTCACHSP101 F ACGAGACAATTGCTACAGCTCATGAGCHSP101 R AGAAGACCCATAATCAACTGGTCAACAGCAt5g60910 qPCR F GCTTCTCAAAAAGATTAAGGAGAGGGAGAt5g60910 qPCR R AGCCGGAAGCAGAGAGTTTGGTTCCGT
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis of Agmous-like 8
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
21
Primer Name Primer Sequence (5' to 3') Purpose
At4g11370 qPCR F CGATCTGACCCGACACGCTCTCTCTAt4g11370 qPCR R GGACATTTCATCTTGTTGTAGTCAACGATCTUB8 F ATAACCGTTTCAAATTCTCTCTCTCTUB8 R TGCAAATCGTTCTCTCCTTG
HSFA1b ChIPA F GCATGGCTATTTATCCAACCTGGAG
HSFA1b ChIPA R GCATTCATTCTTTCCCTCACATACTTGTCTCT
HSFA6b ChIPA F AGCCGATAATGCTTGCACTAAGACAAC
HSFA6b ChIPA R GTTTGATACGTATAAACACAGTGGGTCC
HSFA7a ChIPA F CTGTCTCTGGTACTACAGACCAGATG
HSFA7a ChIPA R CTCTTCCTAGAAGCTGTAGACTTCGTAGCC
HSFB1 ChIPA F CAGTAAATGGTTCCGTTTAAGCTGTTAG
HSFB1 ChIPA R TCTCCACATAGAAAAGTCGGAATGAAC
HSFC1 ChIPA F GATTCTACGCAACGTGTCGAATCAGTACTTG
HSFC1 ChIPA R GATGGCAAGTTATTAGTCCGAGCCGTTG
HSFC1 ChIPB F ACGGCTCGGACTAATAACTTGCCATCTAAG
HSFC1 ChIPB R GTTGTCCATAGCGAAATAAAGGAGAACAAG
HSFA1b ChIPB F GTTCCCGAATCCGTACCATCGCCGA
HSFA1b ChIPB R TGCTCCACGAAACGACCTCATTGG
HSFA6b ChIPB F GGTTCATTAAAGAGGAGTTTCCTGC
HSFA6b ChIPB R CTAATGGTTGTGGATAGCTCAATG
HSFA7a ChIPB F TGCTCCACCTCCATTTCTGACCAAG
HSFA7a ChIPB R GAATGCAAATCCCAGACGACAAAACTTG
ChIP-qPCR of HSFC1 in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA , amplify region from -1917 to -1749 upstream of translation starting site ATG
ChIP-qPCR of HSFA1b in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA , amplify region from 8 to 142 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control ChIP-qPCR of HSFA6b in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA , amplify region from 14 to 185 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control ChIP-qPCR of HSFA7a in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA , amplify region from 72 to 185 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control
ChIP-qPCR of HSFA1b in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA or RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from -1717 to -1580 upstream of translation starting site ATG
ChIP-qPCR of HSFA6b in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA or RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from -1859 to -1719 upstream of translation starting site ATG
ChIP-qPCR of HSFA7a in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA or RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from -1323 to -1175 upstream of translation starting site ATG
ChIP-qPCR of HSFB1 in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA or RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from -1903 to -1722 upstream of translation starting site ATG
ChIP-qPCR of HSFC1 in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA or RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from -2045 to -1892 upstream of translation starting site ATG
Reference gene for qRT-PCR analysis
qRT-PCR analysis of RING-H2 figure A1A
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
22
Primer Name Primer Sequence (5' to 3') Purpose
HSFB1 ChIPB F GCTGTGACGGCGGCGCAAAGATCAG
HSFB1 ChIPB R CCTTCTTCGTTCCATGAAACGACGTCG
HSFC1 ChIPC F CACCTTTCATCGTGAAAACATATCAGATG
HSFC1 ChIPC R GTAAGATTCGTTGCGAGAAGTCGAG
HSFA1b ChIPB F NEW ACCGCCAGATTGTTAGATATCAGCCGTCG
HSFA1b ChIPB R NEW GTTACTCCAGAAACTCTACTTGAAGGGT
HSFA6b ChIPB F NEW GTTTGCAAACGAAGGGTTTCTTAGAGGGCA
HSFA6b ChIPB R NEW AGCTCCATCATCAACACTTGCTTGTCTCG
HSFA7a ChIPB F NEW ACGAGCTTCGCAGAGAGAAGCAAGTGC
HSFA7a ChIPB R NEW CGAAGGACTCTGCATTGCTCTAGCCAG
HSFB1 ChIPB F NEW CTAGTGACGTTCTTGACGGGTCATCTG
HSFB1 ChIPB R NEW CACTCACCACATAATTCTTTTCATCCCGGTCC
HSFC1 ChIPB F NEW CAACACCGTCGCCGTCATCAACGGAGAATC
HSFC1 ChIPB R NEW CTCCGTTAACACTCTCCGGCAAAGAAAACG
RCF2 NotI F AGTCGCGGCCGCATGTATAGTAATAATAGAGTAGAAGTG
RCF2 EcoRI R AGTCGAATTCTTAAGAGTATCTTCCCGAAGATGGCANAC019 NdeI F AGTCCATATGATGGGTATCCAAGAAACTGACCCGTNAC019 SalI R AGTCGTCGACCATAAACCCAAACCCACCAACNAC019 XbaI F AGTCTCTAGAATGGGTATCCAAGAAACTGACCCGTNAC019 SalI R AGTCGTCGACTCACATAAACCCAAACCCACCAAC
RCF2 FLAG SpeI FAGTCACTAGTATGGACTACAAAGACGATGACGACAAAATGTATAGTAATAATAGAG
RCF2 XhoI R AGTCCTCGAGTTAAGAGTATCTTCCCGAAGATGGCAHSFA6b XhoI F AGTCCTCGAGAGTCATGTACGTCAAGTCGTGAAGGHSFA6b SpeI R AGTCACTAGTGTGGAGTTTTGGGTGTGAAGATGAAG
ChIP-qPCR of HSFC1 in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA , amplify region from 44 to 169 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control
ChIP-qPCR of HSFA1b in plants expressing RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from 1358 to 1547 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control
ChIP-qPCR of HSFA6b in plants expressing RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from 1084 to 1293 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control
ChIP-qPCR of HSFA7a in plants expressing RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from 908 to 1077 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control
ChIP-qPCR of HSFB1 in plants expressing RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from 742 to 973 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control
ChIP-qPCR of HSFC1 in plants expressing RCF2:RCF2-FLAG , amplify region from 749 to 943 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control
Plasmid construction of MBP-NAC019
Plasmid construction of pGreenII 62SK-NAC019 for dual luciferase reporter assay
Plasmid construction of HSFA6b:LUC fordual luciferase reporter assay
Plasmid construction of pGreenII 62SK-FLAG-RCF2 for dual luciferase reporter assay
Plasmid construction of MBP-RCF2
ChIP-qPCR of HSFB1 in plants expressing NAC019:NAC019-HA , amplify region from 4 to 110 downstream of translation starting site ATG, as negative control
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927
Biotin-labeled (5'-end) or unlabled antisense probe for EMSAs
Site-directed mutagenesis of pDONR221-RCF2 which serves as an entry clone for construction of pEarleyGate202-RCF2(D161A), or a template for construction of pGreenII 62SK-FlAG-RCF2(D161A) with the primer pair RCF2 FLAG SpeI F and RCF2 XhoI R; site-directed mutagenesis of pDONRzeo-RCF2 (genomic fragment used for the construction of pearleyGate302-RCF2) which serves as an entry clone for plasmid construction of pEarleyGate302-RCF2(D161A).
Supplemental Data. Guan et al. (2013). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.113.118927