Supplemental Data TMC-95-Based Inhibitor Design Provides Evidence for the Catalytic Versatility of the Proteasome Michael Groll, Marion Götz, Markus Kaiser, Elisabeth Weyher, and Luis Moroder Synthesis of the enantiomerically pure 3-fluoro-4-nitrophenylalanine NO 2 F NO 2 F Br NBS, AIBN CCl 4 O O O O HN O NO 2 F O O O O HN O NaH, DMF H 3 N OH O NO 2 F conc. HCl reflux N H OH O NO 2 F O Ac 2 O, NaHCO 3 ,dioxane/ H 2 0 Acylase I pH 7.5, KOH H 2 N OH O NO 2 F L-isomer Z-OSu, NaHCO 3 , dioxane/H 2 O N H OH O NO 2 F Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3-Fluoro-4-nitrobenzylbromide (2): was prepared from commercially available 3-fluoro- 4-nitrotoluene (4.24 g, 27.3 mmol), N-bromosuccinimide (4.86 g, 27.3 mmol) and AIBN (500 mg) in CCl 4 using refluxing conditions for 24 h. The succinimide precipitate was filtered off and the final product was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) to yield 3.79 g of a yellow oil in 59 % yield; ESI-MS: m/z 235 [M+H] + . Ethyl 2-(acetylamino)-2-(ethoxycarbonyl)-3-(3’-fluoro-4’-nitrophenyl)propanoate (3) was prepared according to Vergne et al. 1 . Sodium hydride (60 % in paraffin, 0.58 mg, 14.5 mmol) was washed with pentane and suspended in DMF (6 ml). A solution of diethyl acetamidomalonate (3.45 g, 16.0 mmol) in DMF (15 ml) and a solution of (2) (3.4 g, 14.5 mmol) in DMF (5 ml) were added successively and the reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h
10
Embed
Supplemental Data TMC95Based Inhibitor Design Provides Evidence for the Catalytic Versatility of the Proteasome
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Supplemental Data
TMC-95-Based Inhibitor Design Provides Evidence
for the Catalytic Versatility of the Proteasome
Michael Groll, Marion Götz, Markus Kaiser, Elisabeth Weyher, and Luis Moroder
Synthesis of the enantiomerically pure 3-fluoro-4-nitrophenylalanine
NO2
F
NO2
F
Br
NBS, AIBN
CCl4 O O
O O
HNO
NO2
F
O O
O O
HNO
NaH, DMF H3NOH
O
NO2
F
conc. HCl
reflux
NH
OH
O
NO2
F
O
Ac2O, NaHCO3,dioxane/H20
Acylase I
pH 7.5, KOHH2NOH
O
NO2
F
L-isomer
Z-OSu, NaHCO3,
dioxane/H2ONH
OH
O
NO2
F
Z
1 2 3
4
567
3-Fluoro-4-nitrobenzylbromide (2): was prepared from commercially available 3-fluoro-
The macrocycic peptide was deprotected with 50 % TFA in CH2Cl2 (5 ml) for 1 h at room
temperature. The solvent was evaporated and the product precipitated with ice-cold tert-
butyl methyl ether/hexane (2:1) to give 8 mg of a white powder in a 41 % yield. ESI-MS:
m/z 1059.8 [M+TFA+H]+.
Kinetic Assays
Kinetic assays were performed on a single cell fluorometer using with a total DMSO
concentration below 1 %. The chymotryptic activity was measured in 20 mM HEPES, 0.5
mM EDTA, 0.037 % SDS, pH 7.8 at 37 °C, with 4.92 µM Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as
fluorogenic substrateand 0.5 nM enzyme concentration at 380 nm excitation and 460 nm
emission. The tryptic activity was measured in 50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl,
8
pH 7.5 at 37 °C, with 19.42 µM Bz-Phe-Val-Arg-AMC as the fluorogenic substrate, and
2.0 nM enzyme concentration at 380 nm excitation and 460 nm emission. The PGPH
activity was measured in 50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5 at
37 °C, with 39 µM Z-Leu-Leu-Glu-βNa as the fluorogenic substrate, and 2.0 nM enzyme
concentration at 345 nm excitation and 425 nm emission. Inhibitors were dissolved in
DMSO and used at 1-300 mM concentration in the assays. The Ki values were derived as
described previously 2, 3.
X-ray crystallography
Co-crystallisation
Crystals of the 20S proteasome from S. cerevisiae were grown in hanging drops at 24°C as
has been described4 and incubated for 60 min with compound BIA20 and BIA32,
respectively. The protein concentration used for crystallization was 40mg/ml in Tris-HCl
(10 mM, pH 7.5) and EDTA (1 mM). The drops contained 3 µl of protein and 2 µl of the
reservoir solution, containing 30 mM of magnesium acetate, 100 mM of morpholino-
ethane-sulphonic acid (pH 7.2) and 10% of MPD.
The space group belongs to P21 with cell dimensions of a=136 Å, b=300 Å, c=144 Å and
β �=113°. Data to 3.1 Å for the CP:BIA20 and to 2.8 Å for the CP:BIA32-complex were
collected using synchrotron radiation with λ �= 1.05 Å on the BW6-beamline at DESY/
Hamburg/Germany. Crystals were soaked in a cryoprotecting buffer (30% MPD, 20 mM of
magnesium acetate, 100 mM of morpholino-ethane-sulfonic acid pH 6.9) and frozen in a
stream of liquid nitrogen gas at 90 K (Oxford Cryo Systems). X-ray intensities were
evaluated by using the MOSFILM program package (version 6.1) and data reduction was
performed with CCP4 5. The anisotropy of diffraction was corrected by an overall
anisotropic temperature factor by comparing observed and calculated structure amplitudes
using the program CNS 6. Electron density was improved by averaging and back
transforming the reflections 10 times over the twofold noncrystallographic symmetry axis
using the program package MAIN 7. Conventional crystallographic rigid body, positional
and temperature factor refinements were carried out with CNS 6 using the yeast 20S
proteasome structure as starting model 8. For model building the program MAIN was used.
Modelling experiments were performed using the coordinates of yeast 20S proteasome
with the program MAIN 7.
9
Table. Data collection and refinement statistics
CP:BIA-1a CP:BIA-2a Crystal parameters Space group P21 P21 Cell constants (one molecule / AUa)
a=135.5Å; b=301 Å, c=144.3 Å β=113.0°
a=136.4Å; b=301 Å, c=144.8 Å β=113.2°
Data collection Beamline BW6, DESY BW6, DESY Wavelength (Å) 1.05 1.05 Resolution range (Å)b 99-2.81 (2.85-2.81) 99-3.1 (3.12-3.07) No. observations 3680171 2920847 No. unique reflectionsc 252489 192705 Completeness (%)b 97.6 (85.8) 97.4 (98.7) Rmerge (%)b, d 6.2 (33.1) 8.1 (39.4) I/σ (I)b 26.3 (1.9) 18.2 (1.2) Refinement (CNS) Resolution range (Å) 15-2.81 15-3.1 No. reflections working set 238485 176430 No. reflections test set 12489 9291 No. non hydrogen 49644 2598 Solvent water 1070 Inhibitor (non hydrogen) 96 116 Rwork/Rfree (%)f 21.7 / 24.1 20.1 / 23.6 rmsd bond lengths (Å) / (°)g 0.007 / 1.3 0.007 / 1.3
a Asymmetric unit. b The values in parentheses of resolution range, completeness, Rmerge and I/σ (I) correspond to the last resolution
shell. c Friedel pairs were treated as different reflections. d Rmerge(I) = ΣhklΣj | I(hkl)j - I(hkl)] |/[Σhkl Ihkl , where I(hkl)j is the jth measurement of the intensity of reflection
hkl and <I(hkl)> is the average intensity. e Figure of merit = <ΣαP(α)eix/ΣαP(α), after density modification, where α is the phase and P(α) is the phase
probability distribution. f R = Σhkl | |Fobs| - |Fcalc| |/Σhkl |Fobs|, where Rfree
9 is calculated without a sigma cutoff for a randomly chosen 5% of reflections, which were not used for structure. refinement, and Rwork is calculated for the remaining reflections.
g Deviations from ideal bond lengths/angles 10. Supplemental References
1. Vergne, C., Bois-Choussy, M., Ouazzani, J., Beugelmans, R. & Zhu, J.
Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Enantiomerically pure 4-Fluoro-3-Nitro and 3-Fluoro-4-nitro phenylalanine. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 8, 391-398 (1997).
2. Kaiser, M. et al. Binding mode of TMC-95A analogues to eukaryotic 20S proteasome. ChemBioChem 5, 1256-66 (2004).
3. Kaiser, M. et al. TMC-95A analogues with endocyclic biphenyl ether group as proteasome inhibitors. Chem. Biodiv. 1, 161-173 (2004).
10
4. Groll, M. & Huber, R. Purification, crystallization and X-ray analysis of the yeast 20S proteasomes. Methods Enzymol. 398, 329-336 (2005).
5. Lesslie, A. G. Mosfilm user guide, mosfilm version 5.2. MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambrige, UK. (1994).
6. Brünger, A. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1, 905-921 (1998).
7. Turk, D. Improvement of a programm for molecular graphics and manipulation of electron densities and its application for protein structure determination. Thesis, Technische Universitaet Muenchen (1992).
8. Groll, M. et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386, 463-71 (1997).
9. Brünger, A. T. Assessment of phase accuracy by cross validation: the free R value. Methods and applications. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 49, 24-36 (1993).
10. Engh, R. & Huber, R. Accurate bond and angles parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Cryst. A47, 392-400 (1991).