l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 42G04SW0ai1 2.12448 WALLS 010 GEOPHYSICAL REPORT OF THE WALLS TOWNSHIP PROPERTY ONTARIO, CANADA Val d'Gr, Quebec December, 1988 Super vi si on 6eo--X I ne , Jean-Claude Parish, B. St:, SUPERVISION GEO-X INC. (96, !9C Rut, VAL o'OK, QC. J9P 2X5 TEu.: (BI9) S2S-SD23 FAX (BI9) B3S-I1B1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
A m a g n e t. i c:, el e c: t r o ft) a g n e t i c: (V. L. F. ) a n d Ma x M i ri s LI r v e y s w e? r e
p e? r-f o r m e d on Mont, val Resources Ltd p) roper t y located i ri Walls
Townr.h i p , On tar i o.
Good correlation exist between each survey. 7'he magnetic: survey
was able to delineate the location o-f a mineralize horizon within
a sedimentary unit, (-felsic tu-f-f ?) , also it was able to pick up
the contact, between a sedimentary unit (-felsic tu-f-f ?) and the
basaltic flow located on the? south west part o-f the grid.
The V.L.F". survey delineates possible fractures within the
sedimentary unit (-felsic tu-f-f ?) and also it was able to
determine possible shear zones at the contact between the
sedimentary -formation and the basaltic unit located on the south
west part of the grid.
The Max Min anomalies correspond very well with the V.L.F.
anomaly B, which could be the indication of a possible mineralize
-fractured zone within the sedimentary -formation (-felsic tuff).
A drilling program is recommended in order to determine the
possible economic potenti el on the Montval Resources Ltd
propertyM A total of 6000 feet will be required to verify the
p oss i b l e g o l ci m i n er a l i z e st r uc t ur es.
SUPERVISION GED-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
CERT IF-" I GATE OF QUALIFICATION
I Jean-Claude Parish, of Val d'Or, in the province of Quebec, C a n a da, d o hi e r e b y c e r t i f y that:
l reside at 121 Place Vanier, apartment 6, Val d'Or, Quebec.
I am a qualified geologist having received my academic training at University of New-E-irunswick in Fredericton, New-Brunswick graduated in 1976, B.Bc. honors.
I have been continuously engaged in my profession for the past 13 years. I have examined the assessment work files covering the subject property and the immediate area.
This report is based on the author's experience in exploration on a comprehensive study of all the work records and on geological maps and reports published for the area.
I have not, direct, l y or indirectly received or expect to receive any interest, direct or indirect, in the property of Montval Resources Ltd. or beneficially own, directly or indirectly, any s e c u r i i. i G s o f t li a t c o m p a n y.
Jean-Claude Parish, B.Bc.
SUPERVISION GED-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
Supervision Geo- X was asked on behalf of Gestion Edward Ingham
I n c:: . t. o w i"- i t. e; a g e o p h y s i c a l r t? p a rt a ri M o n t. v a l R e s o u r c e s Ltd.
p r o p f r- 1 y l a c a t. e d i n Wall s T' o w n s h i p .
B . M . E x p l o r a i. i on c u t a d e tail grid t o t a 1 1 i n g 35.62 miles o -f cross
lines, 2.63 miles of tie lines and 4.93 miles of base lines. An
electromagnetic survey (V.L.F.) arid a magnetic survey were
performed on the grid. The V.L.F. survey was performed with a
Beanies EM 16 instrument while the magnetic survey was executed
with a Scintrex mp-2 apparatus. Readings were taken at 100 ft
intervals along lines spaced at 600 ft. A total of 1874 readings
of V.L.F. and mag were taken during the surveys.
A total of 8.39 miles of a Max M in survey was performed on the
property. Readings were taken at. 100 ft intervals with a cable
separation of 500 ft. A total of 443 readings were taken during
the B u r ve y.
The walls property is made f o 142 contiguous unpatented mining
claims for a total of approximately 2,300 hectares. It is
located in the central part, of walls township.
The walls claim group is accessible from a forest access road
going south from Hearst and -from another access road located a
few kilometers further west. A few logging roads off the main
access rout, cos; extend near and os' e r parts of the walls claim
group. Logging took place over large sections of the property.
Many of the secondary roads are unused and vegetation infringes
9 2 3 3 B O - 9 2 3 3 8 3 i rt c l u s i v e l y 4 64
1 916728 - 916729 inclusively 2 32
9J.6723 -- inclusively l 16
923387 - 923390 inclusively 4 64
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l - BUPERVIBIDN GED-X INC.
82 claims 1312(Hec
ft—jsL-.\s\s
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
Total of 142 claimsApprox. 2,300 hectares ( 5680 acres)
Scale H*0,000
MONT VAL RESOURCES LTD.Walls PropertyCLAIM MAP
FIGURE 3
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
.....O,
A m a x Hi n e r a l s E. x p l o r a t. i o n I.. t d conducted an a e r o m a g n e t i c survey in
1980 over parts o -f Walls and Minnipuka Township (1-1961). This
survey was -followed in 1981 by diamond drilling, -four holes being
o n 1 1' \ e s u b .j e c: t W a 1 1 s p r o p e r t y .
l' h e l a t e s, t. w o r- k r e g i s t e r e d on t h e assessment -files was p e r -f o r m e d
in early 1978 -for Golden Trio Minerals Ltd. It consisted of an
airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey (V.L.F.) which
covered large area, including the subject property (T-3127) . The
survey was per -formed using a Cessna 172 equiped with a Proton
Precession Magnetometer and a Totem V.L.F. electromagnetic
system. The average line spacing was one third o-f a mile.
Several conductors were detected by the airborne geophysical
survey published in 1986 by the Ontario Geological Survey. A
wide anomalous zone of electromagnetic anomalies runs across the
W a 1 1 B p r o p e r t. y a t a p p r o x i m a t e l y l O 5 degrees.
The area is underlain by rocks o-f Precambrian age o-f the Superior
Province of the Canadian Shield. A large belt is composed mainly
o-f sedimentary rocks and with less abundant volcanics rocks and
their i n t r u s i. v e e equivalent. T h i s bel t i s p a rt t:) f t h e Q u e t i c o
S u b p r o v i n c e .
G n e i s s i c r c:) c: k s i n t r- u d e d b y d o m a l -f e l s i c pi u t a n s a r- e c l a s s i -f i e d as
p a r t. o f t. h B W a w a S u b ~ p r o v i ri c e . Finally, a n a r r o w belt o-f
volcanic rocks, also part o-f the Wawa Sub-province trends
t. h r o u g h t. W a 1 1 s a n d M i n n i p u k a t o w n s h i p s .
SUPERVISION GEO-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
R e g i a n a .1 m a t a m o r p h i s m i n t h e a r e a u s u ally r a n g e s f r o m m i d d l e t. o
L.I p p e r g r e e n c: h i s t -f a c i e s b u t. i t l c:) c: a l l y r c? a c h e s t. h e granulite--
a m p h i b o l i i. e i" a n g e o r- h i g h e i"- . A -f e w r e g i o n a l -fa u 1 1 s , m o st o -f them
striking north-east were mapped. Diabase dykes, most of them
B t. r i k i n g n o r t h - w e s t a n d n o r t. h - e a s t. , a r e r e l a t i v e l y v e r y n u m e r o u s .
There are very -few outcrops on the Walls claim group. Greywacke,
metamorphosed to schist, was encountered in the western part o-f
the Walls claim group. In the eastern part o-f the property, the
major rock units are, from north to south, tonalite, m a -f i c to
intermediate volcanic -flows, -felsic tuff and mafic. to
i n t fs r m e d i a t. e i" o c k s ( m o s 1. 1 y b r e c c: i a , t u f f and m i n o r g r e y w a c k e ) .
Sulphide mineralization was intersected i ri most o-f the holes
drilled in the general area. On the Walls property, -five of the
seven holes drilled in the past intersected graphite with pyrite
and\or pyrrhotite?. The other two contained pyrite and
p y r r hot i te.
Gold mineralization was discovered a few decades ago in Hawkins
and Walls townships, a few kilometers west of the walls property.
The gold occurs in quartz veins and is associated with sulphides.
T' h e h o s; t r o c k s a r s highly m e t a m o r p h o s e d volcanic roc k s .
SUPERVISION GEO-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
l. Magnet i cs
T o t a l F i e l ci I n t e ri s i t y
The Earth's, magnetic -field generally ressembles that, of a bar-
magnet. This -field is distorted by several factors but through
the use of sensitive magnetometers the variations attributable to
l o c a l e f -f e c:: i. s c: a n b e m e s u r e d . T h e B e l o c a l e f f e c t s; generally
reflect the changes in magnetic susceptibility of the lithology
i n t h e s u r- v e y a r e a. G e o l c:) g i c: u n i t s o f d i. f f e r e n t m a g ri e t i c field
a t. t h e f:) o in t w h K r e t h e t w o u n i t s m e e t. T his distortion o r
a n o m a l y w i 11 h a v e a c h a r a c t e r i s t i c: s h a p B and amp l i t u d e s dependent
on the variation in the magnetic susceptibility of the rock
types, depth to the contact and the orientation of the magnetic
field with respect to the geometry of the contact.
M a g n e? t. i c: a n o m a l i e s m a y t h e r- e f o r e , be at t r i b u t e d to f a LA 11 s and
s h e B. r z o n e s , c h an g e s i n g e c:) l c:) g i c facies within a unit and to
concent rat i oris f or mi neral i 7. at i on havi ng magnet i c: mi neral s in
t h e i r- a s s e m b l a g e.
The magnetic field is affected by several factors, most notably
diurnal variations within the field and magnetic storms which are
attributed to solar activity. The variations can be corrected
from the magnetic measurements using a base station magnetometer
o f b y r e p e a t i n g t h e m a g n e t i c m e a s u r e m e n t at s p e c i f i c i n t e r v a l s at
a s e 3. e c: t e d t) a s e e; t a t i o n .
In cases where magnetic: storm activity is severe, measurement of
the total magnetic field should not be conducted as corrections
become impractical due to the number of high frequency variations
of the? f i el d .
SUPERVISION GEO-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
- j j .
It is well known that, rocks types vary in conductivity arid that a
p r i di a r y e l e c: t. r- o m a g n e t i c f i e l d will gene r a t e se c o ri d a r y -f i e l d s
within the rocks. The more conductive geologic: units will have
h i g h e r a m p l i t u ci e a n o m a l i e s , t. hi u s an e x p r- e s s i. o n of t h e c o n d u c: t a n c. e
o f v a r- i o u s l i t h o l o g i e s o r c h E* n g e s within l i t h o l o g i e s can b e
acqui red .
P o we r -f u l military communication transmitters i ri the 15 to 2. 5
kilocycle range have been applied to geophysical exploration;
electromagnetic receivers tuned to a specific transmitter can
measure the tilt and field strength of the secondary magnetic
f i e l d g en er at eel w i t h i ri t h e Earth. A s i mp l e math emat i c
relationship ex i sits to convert the tilt and field strength
measurements into the in-phase axncl cut-phase of phase components
(i terms of percent) which are presented by many instruments.
T h e s e m e a s u r- e m e n t s c a n t. h e n b e plotted and inspected to d e? t e r m i n e
the presence and orientation of conductive features.
V . L . F' , E M s u r v e y s m u s t b e c o n d u t:: t e d u n d e r c e r tain c r i t. e r i a f o r
the information to tie valid. These? criteria at r e easily met and
are as f o l l o w.
a) The orientation of the survey l i ri e s must parallel the
t r a n s m i 1 1 e d e l e c: t r o m a g n e t i c fie l d , t h a t is, be at 9 O d g r t o t h e
primary field direction w hi i eh is the direction to the location of
t hi e s e J. e c:: t e d t K 1 - a n s m i 1 1 e r .
Measurements of the secondary field can then be made in the
presence of a uniform primary field arid the variations of the
s e c o n ci a r y f i e l d w i 3 l r e f l e c:: t c h a n g e E, in c o n d u c t i v i t y with m i n i m a l
f i el d di start:!, on .
SUPERVISION GEO-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
•f ''l i jf.
b) The measurements must. also be made with the instrument
facing in the same direction otherwise anomalies of opposite
p o l a r i t y w i 11 r e s u 11. a n d t h e d a t a c a n b e m i s i n t e r p r e t. e d.
In complex structural regions it. is often good practice to
m e a i:; u i" e res p an B e s u s i n g a s e c o n d 1.1" a r i s m i 11 e r- with a p r i m a r- y field
d i r e c t i o n a t a p p r o x i m a t e l y 9 O d g r to the direction of the f i r- s t
t r a n s m i 11 e r . T h e d e t e c: t i o n o f t h o se? an o m a l i e s a 11 r i b u t a b l e t o
f e a t. u r e s f.:) e r p e n d i c u l ax r t o t he general geologic strike will t hi e n
be enhanced. In normal practice these measurements are made
along the same lines as the first measurement to maintain a cost
efficient. program. However, in complex regions of unknown
geology, a B en: on d set of lines, perpendicular to the first, may
have t o b e p r ep ar ed an d sur veyed w i t h this second t r an sm i 11 er.
Presentation of V-L.F. -- EM data is as profiles of the in-p h as e
a n d o u t - p h a s e c o m p o n e n t s - H o w e v e r , m a ri y anomalies are gen e r a t e d
b y t h e h i g h f r e q u e n c y of t h e V. L.. Fr . t r a n s m i 11 e r w fi i c h a r- e d u e t o
variations in overburden conductivity, swamps and t op o g rap) h y as
well as geologic: conductors. A data processing techniques,
called the "Fraser Filter" can be applied to the data which
allows it to be contoured. This filter converts crossovers and
inflections to positive peaks and minimises station to station
random noise allowing an easier understanding of the data.
T h e V, L.. F. p r o f i l e s a r e i n t e r p i"- e t e d a s f o 11 o w s: a c r o s s o v e r i s
taken at every 2 K difference?. This method is utilised to
cj e t e r m i n e w e a k a n o m a l y p r- o b ably c: a u s e d by e x c e s s i v e o v e r b u r- c J (? n .
11 d e t e r m i n e t. h e o r i e n t a t i o n o f f r- a c t u r e s and possible f a u 11.
Major anomaly will be picked up as well as their weak
continuation. Anomalies which demonstrate continuation are
probably caused by major faults while the non continuous
anomalies are probably due to a small fracture system in the
area.
SUPERVISION GEO-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
13-
t H. E. M.
The horizontal loop el ectromagneti c system is the most popular EM
system in use today. The transmitter and receiver are
i n t e r t:: o n n e c: t e d b y a r- e f e r e n c e c: a b le permitting the m e s u r e m e n t of
the EM -field at. the receiver. Frequenci e s which could be
utilized are 111, 222, 888 and 3555 hz . Interconnecting cables
are available several lengths, 25, 50, 100, 150 and 250 meters.
The components measured are; the in -phase and out phase in
p e r- c e n t a g e o -f t h e p r i m a r y -f i e l d .
Depth penetration is in most situations not more than 50-60
percent, o -f the coils separation. To ensure sufficient data for
proper interpretation, one must make measurements at stations not
more than half of the coil separation apart i ri non-anomalous
areas.
While the survey is executed, great care has to be taken to keep
the distance between the coil constant from station to station
a n d t. o h o l d t h e c o i l s i n o n c o m m o n plane?. A d e s c: r e p a n c y of l
percent. in the coil separation causes an in -phase error of 3
percent which can be important when looking for very weak
conductors in the 5 percent peak to peak amplitude range. A
k n o w l e d g e o f t hi e e s t i m a t e ci o v e r burden t hi i c k' n e s s is i m p o r t a n t when
c o n d u c: t i n g a n H E. M s u r v e y .
The two components measured, in phase and on t --phase are plotted
a n d s i m p 3. e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s s c:: h e m e s a r e u s e d t o c a l c u l a t e d i p and
depth. The width of the conductor is calculated by subtracting
the coil separation from the distance between the ;-:ero value
points of the i rv -phase and out--phase curves. The widths
c a l c u l a t e d u s i n g t h e i n - p h a s e o u r- o u t ~- p h a s e p r o f i l e s m i g h i. d i f f e r
somewhat. Only the val LIE? o b t a i net-:, from the cleanest cur VE? should
be considered correct. A week conductive halo around a very good
SUPERVISION GED-X INC.-
l -14-
I conductor often causes a wider out--p h a se than i ri-p h a se profile.
An estimate o-f the clip o-f the conductor is determined by using a
l dip monogram,, The highest positive peak of in--phase component
tells you the direction of the dip.
m In areas where conductive overburden or host rock is present or
w h e r e t. h e c: o n d u c:: t o r i s e l e c t r- i c a 11 y sat u r a t e d at. higher
l -frequencies these calculated values will often differ-
considerably. In such situations it is imperative to use a
l multi frequency approach to obtained using data collected with the
lowest frequency (that. is, the lowest frequency that produced
l data of suf f i c i ent ampl i t ud e t o be interpreted.
BEDPHYSICAL RESULTS
ll. El*- c t r o m a g n e t i c: s u r v e j/
An electromagnetic survey (V.L.Fr .) was conducted on Montval
l R e s o u r c e s L. t d prop e r t y in Wall s township.
The survey was performed with Geonics E'M 16 instrument. The data
:.i b t a i n e d f r o m t h e s u i"- v e y d e
and D see accompanying map.)
obtained from the survey delineate four major anomalies (A,EI,C,
lThe possible shear zones determined from the survey seem to trend
l in the north-west and south-east direction.
mjjnet i c survey
l The magnetic survey was able to delineate the contact bet we? en
different qeologi cal formation.
l
l
la — SUPERVISION GEO-X INC.————————-——
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
..., i 5...
High magnetic:: responses occur between l i ne '54 W and 12 E at 60 M
and 50 N, line IB E and line 48 E at 36 N and 22 N , line 54 W and
48 E at 24 M and 5 M, line 12 W and line O at 26 N and 22 N, line
72 E and line 78 E at 8 N and 5 N, line 96 E and line 156 E at
BLO and 12 N, line 90 E line 138 E at 9 N and 16 N.
3. Ma K Min sur ye y
A Max Min survey was executed on selected lines on Montval
p r o p e r t y. T h e p u r p o s e s o -f t h e s u r v e y w e r- e to confirm V. L. F.
a n o m a l i e s a ri d t o d e t e r m i n e b e 11 e r d r- i 11 i n g t a r g e t s.
A total of 8.39 miles o-f Max Min was per-f armed on the property.
Max Min anomalies are located along line 24 W and 18 W at 51 N
and 48 N, line 24 W and 18 W at 35 N and 33 N, line O and 6 E at
40 M, line o and 6 E at 24 M and 21 N, line 24 E and line 36 E at
20 N and 16 N, and finally line 126 at 6 B.
SUPERVISION GEO-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
CQNCLUBigN
"l" h e m a g n e t i c s u r- v e y w a s a h le t o d e? l i n e a t. e a h i g hi m a g n G t i c
response probably cause by a pyrrhotite horizon located in a
sedimentary -formation (felsic tuff ?) . Possible mineralise
horizon o cur r ing at the south west, of the grid was pick up by the
magnetic survey. This horizon seems to be present at the contact
b e? t ween a basaltic: and a sedimentary unit. A high magnetic
response occurs at the eastern part of the grid. This anomaly
could be the result, of a mafic plug.
The el ectromacjnet i c survey was able to locate four major possible
shear zones. Anomaly A correlate with the magnetic responses
which could be due to a pyrrhotite horizon within the sedimentary
u n i t.,,
Anomaly B corresponds very well with the Max Min anomalies. This
g e o l o g i c: a l f e a t. u r- e c o u l d b e t h e r e s u 11. s o f a m i n e r ali z e f r a c t u r e
l c:) c a t e d w i t h i n t h e s e d i m e n t a r- y (f e l s i c t u f f ) u n i t.
Anomaly C located at. the eastern part of the grid correlates with
a Max Min r e s p o n s e s, again this g e o l o g i c: a l s t r u c t u re c o u Id be
c a u s e b y a m :i. n e i"- a l i z e f r a c t LA r- e s p r e s e n t w i t. h i n t. h e s e d i m e n t. a r y
un i t *
A n o m a l y D c: o u l d i n d i c: a t e a m i n e r a l i z e f r a c:: t u r- e d h o r i z o n l o c: a t: e d
w i t h i n t IT e b a s a 11 i c f l o w.
SUPERVISION GED-X INC.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
RECOMMANDATlON
The magnet, i c: responses; correlate very well with the
e l e c:: t r o m a g n e t i c: a n o m a l i e s.
F LI r t lie r w o r k s h o u l d b e e x e c u t e d t o d e t. e r m i n e t h e e c o n o m i c:
importance which could occur along a pyrrhotite horizon within a
s e dim e n t a r y u n i t (f e l s i c: t. u -f -f '?) t h e p o s s; i b l e mineralize h o r i z o ri
a l o n g t. h e c o n t a c: t ta e t w e e n a s e d i m e n t a r y -f o r m a t i o n a rt d a basaltic
unit located at the south west. part of the grid, and finally
a 11 e n t i o n s h o u l d b e given t o t h e p o s s i b le mineralize -f r a c t u r e
occurring within the sedimentary unit (determine from the V.L.F.
and Max lvlin anomaly B).
A drilling program is recommended to be executed i ri order to
determine the economic importance of those geological structures
mention above. A total of 6000 ft will be required to verify the
p o s s i b l e g o l d m j. n e i"' a l i. z e s t. r u c t u res.
R e s p e? c t f u 1 1 y s u b m i 1 1 e d ,
, s . -C J4fL**^t-\ 4 si i**
J e a n -- C l a u d e P a r i B
Chi e f Geo l oqi s
SUPERVISION GED-X INC.
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
DOCUMEN' U ;890S
Mining ,...2.12448 WALLS 900
uu nut use snaoeo areas Deiow,
Type of Survey(s)
Max Min, ElectromagneticClaim Holder(s)
Golden Trio Minerals Ltd.
Townihip or
T-720Address
Suite 402-27 Queen Street East, Toronto. OntarioSurvey Company
B.M. Exploration Inc.Date of Survey (from ft to)
05 V 12 .88 l 22 12 88bay j Mo. J Yr. j Day | Mo. [ Yr.
Total Miles of tine Cut
43.18Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
Jean-Claude Parise, 121 Place Vanier, Apt. #16, Val d'Or, Quebec J9P 2R1
• .r-MS
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
•Other (MaX
Mi n)Geological l ""/
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Typ* of Work Performed
Days per Claim
Atfldflf{
S^-\Jjf
]r\ i O
Day* per Claim
Da y t per Claim
—————— p-Clv I
Performed on Ciaim(s) ;\
MiiiiMCaic uianon of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
S •s- 15
Total Davs Credits
s
Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holders c^O'ce. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Date , Recordcd Holder or Agent (Signaiure)
CV.1
L
L
Certification Verifying Report of Work ty~ vCl— O.-^LtA ,
Mining ClaimPrefix
"- :.. - . V' ,\
fi--
t
EtV^ IS
^NDS 'i
Number
SEE
-ATTACHED-
SHEET
flfiXIMUM 2.
fiGfypMSlC.
^r^TJ^KI "i
THIS S6C
EDi——....89 j ivy
ECTIONf l-jit
Expend. Days C'.
QJZQA i.
i^flfijvr)ZZ"/o*^
P
L,. /.' v \~
S
'
t
i t•' i
4
For Office UwOnlyTotal Days Cr. Dale Recorded . Recorded 1 1 V/ L/ /P Q
rtL/ Date Approvecfas Recorded
Mining ClaimPrefix
m1909
Number
SECORD
MAY 6 4 i!
•i it --
Expend. Days Cr.
—— ...—
P"" '
89
— j ''c;, tlotfll number o* mining claims covered by this 60 report of work.
Mnnl^UdffiBranch Director
( } Z^f i^vJ-thereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work
or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and t'lc annexed report is true.
Narrte end Postal Address of
Jean-Claude PPers
ajiOn Certi
i se,Tying
121. Place Van i L^ApJL.J fi Val rj'Or Quebec J9P 2R1Date Certified ' Certified by (Signature) /J?
K iffj&a-n^ c^Of*--**-*- r**A*"'*
CLAIMS
923356
923357
92335B
923359
923360
923361
'923330
923331
923332
923333
923334
923335
923336
923337
923338
923339
923340
923341
923342
923343
923344
923345
923346
923347
LIST OF MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED ON MONTVAL RESOURCES LTD
PROPERTY IN WALLS TOWNSHIP.
CLAIMS
923348
923349
923350
.923351
^ 923322
723323
923324
.923325*
-923373
923374
923375
x-923376
-9232O4
923205
923206
7232O7j
92320C !
v 721209 .'
- 923236
923237
923238
9"2:323'-7
923240
723241 y
CLAIMS*
923242
916724 l
916725
916726
.916727
.916730
916731
916732
916733
916734
916735
916736
o T A L. - O
MAY 4 ]P3,0
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ontario
Geophysical-Geologlcal-Geochemical Technical Data Statement
File..
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
I
Type of Survey(s) Magnometer, Max-MJn, Electromagnetic (U.L.F.)
Township or Area Walls Township-^—————ClaimHolder(s) Golden Trio Minerals Ltd.
c/o 27 Queen Street East, Suite #402 Toronto, Ontario MbC 'dm———————Survey Company B.M. Explorations Inc.________________Author of Report Jean-Claude Parise______^^____
Address of Author 121 Place Vanier, Apt. #6. Val d'Or. Que Covering Dates of Survey 5/12/88 - 22/12/88____________
(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line Cut 43.18_______________________
SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
-Electromagnetic— Mapnefnmeter...,, .
— Rn^i^nr'f'c-Othpr( Max-Mi n)Gpnlngiral
Hcnrhpmiral.
DAYS per claim
4020
20
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer Electromagnetic Radiometric(enter days per claim)
Values measuredEnergy windows (levels)———————.—^-————^—.—————.—-—..—.^—^^—.—.
Height of instrument___________________________Background Count. Size of detector-———————————.-——^^———-^^———.—————.——..^Overburden -————————.—————-——^^——.—.—-^——...^——————.^—————
(type, depth - include outcrop map)
OTHERS {SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey____————————————————————Instrument ——————————————^—^—^——Accuracy_______________^____________
Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s)———
Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy——————^—————————.(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used——————^————-——.——^^—-..-—————————
Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.
i •"•s
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, Ontario 'P4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
Re: Notice of Intent dated July 7, 1989 Geophysical (Electromagnetic, Magnetometer and HEM) Survey submitted on Mining Claims P 923357 et al in Walls Township.
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Assessment day* credit per claim Mining CUImt Assessed
Geophysical
Electromagnetic.
Magnetometer.
Radiometric
Induced polarization.
HEM 13
.dayi
.days
.days
.days
-days
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
Geological ———————————————————days
Geochemical _________________days
P '923357 to 359 Incl. 923332 to 336 1ncl. 923339 to 343 1ncl. 923348 to 350 1ncl. 923323 to 325 incl. 923207-208 923236 923238-239
Mondays Q
Special provision Gfl
Airborne D
Ground
D Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
f~l Credits have been reduced because of corrections l lo work dales and figures of applicant.
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credit! have been allowed for the following mining dalms
rio l sufficiently covered tay the turvey Q Insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce (he above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical -60; Geologoe*! - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) -60.
Ministry o)Northern Developmentend Mines
Technical Assessment Work Credits
Ontario Oil*
July 7, 1989
File
2.12448wJTrl00 "**0"'*'11 Report ot
foS9b'6-244
Recorded Holder
Township or AreaGOLDEN TRIO MINERALS LIMITED
WALLS TOWNSHIP.Type of survey and number of
Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims AsMtxd
Geophysical
Electromagnetic.
Magnetometer.
Radiometric ._
Induced polarization .
Other———--———
-dayj
.days
.days
-days
.days
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
P 923356 to 923330 to 923322 to 923373 to 923204 to 923236 to 916724 to
Q Credits have been reduced because of partialcoverage of claims,
i _j Q) Credits have been reduced because of corrections j to work dates and figures of applicant.
Special credits under section 77 (16) (or the following mining claims
No crediti have been allowed for the following mining claims
not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical dal* filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necesury in order that ih* total number ot approved assessment tfoyt recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical -80; Geologocal. 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19}-GO.