Superframe Scheduling with Beacon Enable Mode in Wireless Industrial Networks Oka Danil Saputra, Soo Young Shin Wireless & Emerging Networking System (WENS) Laboratory, School of Electronic Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, South Korea. 1 International Workshop on Wireless, Mobile and Sensor Network-2014 Istanbul, Turkey - August 22-23, 2014
Superframe Scheduling with Beacon Enable Mode in Wireless Industrial Networks
Jul 15, 2015
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Superframe Scheduling with Beacon Enable Mode in
Wireless Industrial Networks
Oka Danil Saputra, Soo Young Shin
Wireless & Emerging Networking System (WENS) Laboratory,
School of Electronic Engineering,
Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, South Korea.
1
International Workshop on Wireless, Mobile and Sensor Network-2014 Istanbul, Turkey - August 22-23, 2014
Keywords
• Superframe
• Scheduling
• Beacon
• ISA100.11a
2
Wireless Industrial Networks (WINs)
3
Figure source: • The ISA100 Standards Overview & Status• http://www.yokogawa.com/pr/news/2012/img/20120207-1en.jpg
Control Room
WHY WINs
4
• Offer low cost • Routing is never an issue.• Flexibility • Easy to Installation
Figure source: https://www.nics.uma.es/images/research/WSN-sensors-industrial-c1.jpg
Focus Area
5
Wireless Industrial Networks Technology
Wireless HART
MAC Layer:Complies with the IEEE 802.15.4-2006 MAC
MAC Layer:Modified IEEE 802.15.4-2006 MAC
ISA100.11a
CSMA/CASent Aperiodic Message
TDMA Sent Periodic Message
Focus Area• CSMA/CA: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance• TDMA: Time Division Multiple Access
Related Work
6
Paper Limitation
[4] The knowledge about industrial data have characteristic“periodically” didn’t address by paper.
[6] That proposed method requires more beacon (overhead) .
• [4] F.P. Rezha and Soo Young Shin. Performance evaluation of isa100.11a industrial wireless network. InInformation and Communications Technologies (IETICT 2013), IET International Conference on, April 2013.
• [6] F. Dewanta, F.P. Rezha, and Dong-Sung Kim. Message scheduling approach on dedicated time slot ofisa100.11a. In ICT Convergence (ICTC), 2012 International Conference on, pages 466–471, Oct 2012.
Contribution
• Paper discuss clearness about superframescheduling inspired by deadline monotonicscheduling.
• Our proposed method reduce the overheadwithout degrading the network performance.
7
Network Model
8
𝑀2
𝑀1
𝑀3
𝑀4
𝑀𝑛
𝑛 : the maximum number of node in covered by gateway.
Message Characteristic
9
Where:𝑟𝑀: start release time.𝑐𝑀: computation time.𝑑𝑀: deadline time.𝑡𝑀: period of message.𝐼𝑗: Iteration with index-𝑗.
Proposed Scheme
10
Beacon:• Synchronization.• More scalability.• Self-organization.
[3] Wireless systems for industrial automation: Process control and related applications. ISA100.11a Working Group, pages 1–817, 2009.
10 ms [3]
Length of superframe 25 [3]
Superframe: 𝑆 = 𝐵 + 𝑁=1𝑁=𝜂
𝑀𝑁
Deadline Monotonic Scheduling
11
Figure source: http://groups.inf.ed.ac.uk/teaching/slipc10-11/maciej.php?page=docs/design
Scheduling Analysis
Theorem IV.1: Superframe is schedulable if and only if sufficient
Proof: Suppose that the condition is insufficient thereby 𝑐𝑀𝑛 > 𝑑𝑀𝑛, then
message 𝑀𝑁 cannot finish computation time before deadline 𝑑𝑀𝑛. Therefore
node misses to deliver data and unschedulable. The condition schedulable ispassed while message have enough time to finish the execution.
12
∀𝑴𝑵: 𝒄𝑴𝒏≤ 𝒅𝑴𝒏
Note: Beacon, Message 1, Message 2, Message 3.
𝑀1
𝑀2𝑀3
Miss Deadline
Flowchart and Pseudocode
13
Simulation Parameter
14
• Simulation Tool: Matlab
Where:𝑟𝑀: start release time.𝑐𝑀: computation time.𝑑𝑀: deadline time.𝑡𝑀: period of message.
Simulation Result
15
Figure Message scheduling [6] is applied by deadline monotonic scheduling
[6] F. Dewanta, F.P. Rezha, and Dong-Sung Kim. Message scheduling approach on dedicated time slot of isa100.11a. In ICT Convergence (ICTC), 2012 International Conference on, pages 466–471, Oct 2012.
More beacon needed.
Simulation Result
16
Figure The proposed scheme, superframe scheduling, is applied by deadline monotonic scheduling
Less beacon needed.
Simulation Result
17
Figure Comparison beacon required between message Scheduling scheme with proposed method
4
8
11
15
18
22
25
29
33
36
Conclusion
• Check the schedulability of superframe in network usingdeadline monotonic.
• Our method guarantee that exchange of data in networksuccessfully without overlap each other with conditionsuperframe passed the schedulability.
• By reducing overhead, more data (message) can be sent innetwork.
18
Questions & Answers
19
THANK YOU
20
Related Documents
