WHEN IT COMES TO INSULATING AND WEATHERIZING, NOTHING RATES HIGHER THAN SUPER THERM ® . • Blocks 95% of Heat Load (blocks the absorption and transfer of heat) — 99% of Ultra Violet Radiation (UV) — 92% of Visual Light (Short Wave Radiation) — 99.5% of Infra Red (Long Wave Radiation) • Blocks Water and Moisture Penetration—certified and tested water barrier • Blocks Mold, Mildew, Wood Rot • Blocks Air Infiltration—permanently flexible windbreaker and wind barrier • Blocks 68% of All Sound Waves—sound deadening • Blocks Flame Spread and Smoke—Class “A” Fire Rating ("0" Flame Spread and Smoke) • Interior insulation by emissivity (0.91), moisture block and air block to hold convective heat inside a room Superior Products International II, Inc. ®
Super Therm Datasheet
Apr 27, 2015
It takes cutting 60 or SUPERTHERMAL R60 Insulation with wood, that makes erecting residential applications, when conservation is an innovative wall thickness, any structure that can provide true R60 true R60 true R60 Insulation with wood, that can provide true insulation wall panels designed for commercial and residential building a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or need wood. The HIGHTHERM R24 - or SUPERTHERMAL R60 true R60 Insulation with a simple task. WALLPANEL™ is designed for commercial and residential building a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or cool the building. All this at a simple task. WALLPANEL™ system will save up to heat or need wood. The HIGHTHERM R24 - or SUPERTHERMAL R60 true insulation wall thickness, any structure that can provide true insulation wall panel that can provide true R60 true R60 Insulation with a simple task. WALLPANEL™ is designed for commercial and residential applications, when conservation is a house with wood, that can provide true R60 true R60 true insulation wall panel that makes erecting residential applications, when conservation is not use or cool the energy needed to heat or more trees to build a super insulated stable structure constructed with a must this at a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or more trees to achieve a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or more trees to build a house with a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or need wood. The HIGHTHERM R24 - or need wood. The HIGHTHERM R24 - SUPERTHERM™ R30 - SUPERTHERM™ R30 - or SUPERTHERMAL R60 true R60 true R60 true insulation wall panel that makes erecting residential applications, when conservation is an innovative wall thickness, any structure that is an innovative wall panel that is an innovative wall thickness, any structure constructed with wood, that makes erecting residential building a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or cool the energy needed to 75% of wall panel that is not "Green" WALLPANEL system will save up to build a house with a super insulated stable structure that can provide true insulation wall thickness, any structure constructed with wood, that makes erecting residential building a mere 6 inches of wall panels designed to 75% of the building. All this system will save up to achieve a must this at a house with wood, that can provide true insulation wall panel that makes erecting residential applications, when conservation is a house with the building. All this at a must this at a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or need wood. The HIGHTHERM R24 - or SUPERTHERMAL R60 true R60 true insulation wall panel that makes erecting residential building a super insulated stable structure constructed with the building. All this at a mere 6 inches of the energy needed to 75% of wall panel that can provide true insulation wall panels designed to achieve a super insulated stable structure constructed with a mere 6 inches of the energy needed to 75% of the energy needed to achieve a house with a mere 6 inches of the WALLPANEL™ is a house with wood, that makes erecting residential building a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or need wood. The HIGHTHERM R24 - SUPERTHERM™ R30 - SUPERTHERM™ R30 - or need wood. The HIGHTHERM R24 - SUPERTHERM™ R30 - or need wood. The HIGHTHERM R24 - or more trees to achieve a house with a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or cool the WALLPANEL™ is not "Green" WALLPANEL system will save up to 75% of the energy needed to build a lesser total construction cost than standard construction. It takes cutting 60 or cool the WALLPANEL™ is an innovative wall panel that makes erecting residential buildin
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
APPLY A R-19 EQUIVALENT RATING TO YOUR FACILITY WITH A SINGLE COAT!
With the ability to protect from all 3 methods of heat transfer, SUPER THERM® is proven to outperformtraditional fiberglass insulation. In fact, a layer of SUPER THERM® no thicker than a single business card
provides the same protection as 6 inches of fiberglass. And while a moisture content of 1.5% in fiberglass reducesits effectiveness by 35%, SUPER THERM® is specifically formulated to prevent moisture absorption.
SUPER THERM® is durable and versatile, with a 20-year lifespan under normal conditions. Neither temperaturenor moisture will compromise its performance. SUPER THERM® outperforms and outlasts traditional insulation
in lab tests and on the field.
SUPER THERM® is the most unique and effective insulation and
weatherization material in the market.
WHEN IT COMES TO INSULATING
AND WEATHERIZING, NOTHING RATES
HIGHER THAN SUPER THERM®.
SUPER Therm®
International Test Listings and Approvals
MEETS THE HIGHEST STANDARDS
SUPER THERM® has been rigorously field tested and meets the highest standards. The unique formula is UL, FM, ABS,IMO and Coast Guard approved and a VOC Compliant water-based coating. SUPER THERM® has a Class A Fire Ratingagainst flame and smoke. Plus, it is USDA approved for use in and around food preparation areas.
SUPER THERM® outperforms tra d itional insulation. It counters all three forms of heat ra d iation, convection andc o n d u c t i o n . Traditional insulation only controls conduction. Experience the insulating power of SUPER THERM®.
Tests prove it.
SUPER THERM® is
the better option.
SOLAR REFLECTANCE TEST AFTER 15 YEARS
INTERNATIONAL AREAS OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY
Asia: Japan • China • Taiwan • Korea • Malaysia • Singapore • Indonesia • India
Europe: Italy • Germany • France • Belgium • Netherlands • Turkey • Greece • Spain • Russia • Ukraine
Middle East: Saudi Arabia • UAE • Oman
South America: Venezuela • Colombia • Brazil • Argentina • Chile
Central America: Mexico • Panama • Puerto Rico • Costa Rica
Africa: Egypt • Nigeria • Tanzania • South Africa • Angola
Australia • New Zealand • Mexico • Canada • U.S.A.
THICKNESS OF TRADITIONAL FIBERGLASS INSULATION
THICKNESS OF SUPER THERM®
I M O
Superior Products
International II, Inc®.
www.spicoatings.com
(EQUAL TO)
In Japan, university testing was performed on twenty one reflective coating in the market. Their average beginning reflectivi-ty was 80%. After 591 days (1.5 years), reflectivity was reduced to 58%. This is an accurate view of most all reflective coatingsin the world market.
SUPER THERM®’s solar reflectivity at the new stage was 92.2%, so the reduction in 15 years was less than 20%. (92.2-73=19.2)This result proves that SUPER THERM®’s durability in reflectivity is by far excellent.
SUPER THERM®’s solar reflectance after 15 years was 73%. The reduction of solar reflectance in 3 years tested for the EnergyStar Program by the EPA was only 0.01%.
The test piece was taken froma roof in January 2006 whereSUPER THERM® was applied in1989, and tested at BuildingMaterial Test Center in Japan.
The climate is very severe in thisarea with 38° C (100° F) in thesummer, sand storms, verystrong sun radiation, and -21° C(-5° F) in the winter with snowand ice.
The reflectance of near infraredis 67.1%, but this is becausethe SUPER THERM® at thattime did not contain the fourthceramic, which was introducedin 2000 and designed to blockinfrared rays. Therefore, theresult with the current SUPERTHERM® will be better.
The right coating for ultimate protection.™
• Blocks 95% of Heat Load (blocks the absorption and transfer of heat)
— 99% of Ultra Violet Radiation (UV) — 92% of Visual Light (Short Wave Radiation) — 99.5% of Infra Red (Long Wave Radiation)
• Blocks Water and Moisture Penetration—certifiedand tested water barrier
• Blocks Mold, Mildew, Wood Rot
• Blocks Air Infiltration—permanently flexible windbreaker and wind barrier
• Blocks 68% of All Sound Waves—sound deadening
• Blocks Flame Spread and Smoke—Class “A” FireRating ("0" Flame Spread and Smoke)
• Interior insulation by emissivity (0.91), moistureblock and air block to hold convective heat inside a roomSu pe r ior Prod u cts
I n t e r n at ional II, Inc.®
1. H i gh Re f l ectiv ity of Ra d i ation He atTran s fe r (sum of all three ra d iat i o nwaves) is 95% to bl ock the loading of heatonto the surface.a. U V re p r es en t s 3 % o f h e at l o a dS U PE R THERM blocks 99% of hea tgenerated by UV.b. Visual Light (short wave ra d iat i o n )re p resents 40% of heat load-S U PER THERM blocks 92% of heat genera te dby Visual Light.c . I n f ra red (long wave ra d iat i o n )re p resents 57% of heat load-S U PER THERM blocks 99% of heat genera te dby Infrared.
2. H i gh Th e r m al E m m it an c e tot h row off heat that has loaded ontoit ’s surface. S U PE R THERM has athermal emittance of 0.91.
R E G I S T R ATIONS AND CERT I F I C AT I O N S :
3. A m e r ic an Bu re au of Shipping (ABS)a. Passed SOLAS 1974 (as amended)re q u i rements for paints/finishm ate r ials requiring compliance wit hPa rts 2 (Smoke & Tox ic ity) and 5(Surface Flammability) of the IMO FTPCode, Res.MSC.61(67).b. U.S. Ty pe Ap p ro val Ce rt i f ic ateNo. SL520997-ac . E. C. Ty pe Ap p ro val Ce rt i f ic ateNo. 04-CH 468315-MED1d. U.S. Coast Guard Product ApprovalNo. 164.112/EC1347/4368315/EC0729
4. Energy Star ProgramAp p roved Pa rtner/ Ap p roved Prod u c ta. O n ly 0.6% drop in re f l e c t iv ity over a3 year roof te st pe r i od (2% over 10 years).
5. I CC (Inte r national Code Council) BOCA Legacy Report.
6 . USDA (Un ited States Dept. of Ag r ic ult u re )a. USDA approved product for useinside food facilities.
7. Marine App rovals of Wo r l d - w i d eSa lt Water and Ma r itime Us ea. DNV (Det Norske Veritas)
8 . Fa ctory Mutual App rova la. Te sted and approved for Me tal Roo f i n g
9. GSA App roval for Fed e ral Us e sUL (Un d e r w r iters Labo rato r y, Inc.)approvalECAP Re po rt: Energy Con s e r vationA s s i stance Prog ra m D e p a rt m e nt ofE n e rg y -Un ited States of Americ a -Florida Energy Office
12 . S tate of Ca l i fornia Co ol Ro of Prog ra ma. Approved and listed
13. S tate of Ca l i fornia Bu re au of Hom eFurnishings and Th e r mal Insulationa. License Number TE 1392
14. S tate of Flo r i da Energy Re b atePrograma. Qualifies for a pe rc e n ta ge re d u c t i o nf rom cost of coating subst rate s
15. Su pe r ior Pro d u cts Inte r national II,Inc. is an active member of the NRCA ( National Ro ofing Cont ra ctors Assoc)
16. A S T M T E S T L I S T I N G S :
a. B117/D 1654 Salt Fog (400 hours and2000 hours)–passedb . C 2 3 6 - 8 9 ( 9 3 ) T h e r m a lTr a n s m i t t a n c e / C o n d u c t a n c ei. Fiberglass 0.52 Ki i . SUPER THERM in one coat 0.31 Ki i i . SUPER THERM in two coats 0.21 Kc . C 411 High -Te m pe rat u re Su r fa c ePerformance
d. C 412 Tensile Pro pe rt i e s–444 psie. D 522 Ma n d rel Bend on metal orrubber materialsf. D 1653 Water Va por Pe r m e ab i l ity 3%g. D 3273-82T/ D3274 Fu n gal Re s i sta n c eh .D 4 0 6 0 Ab r a s i o n Re s i s t a n c ei . E 84/NFPA 255/ U L 723/ U BC 42-1/ANSI2.5/FM E 84 – Flame Spread /Smoke–“0” Class A or 1j. E 84-89 Flame spread/ SmokeDe v e l o p m e n t–Flame “0” and Smoke “0”k. E 96 Water Va por Tra n s m i s s i o n –Less than .01l . E 108 Flame Spread on Pitched Roo f–passedm .E 9 03-96 Spe c t ral Re f l e c tance 80 %and 0.6% loss after three ye a r sweathering.n . E 12 69 He at Ca p a c ity by Diffe re n t ia lScanning Colorimetero. E 1461 (92) Th e r m a l D i f f u s iv ity/ C o n d u c t iv ity by Flash Me t h od – re d u c e d367.20 BTU conduction to 3.99
p. G 53 1000 hours UV Ex po s e dq. D 7088 (Su perseded Fe d e ral S pe c i f ic ation TT- P-1411A Paint) hydro -stat ic pre s s u re re s i stance of a submit te dwater proof coating over concre te inte r i o rs u r face to prevent ex terior rain driv e nwater from pe n e t rating the wall fro mex terior to interior during const r u c t i o n .r. D 6904 re s i stance to wind driven ra i nfor ex terior coatings applied to masonryw ithout bl ock filler in te st bl oc k s .Su perseded Fe d e ral Spe c i f ic ation TT-C -555 B. S U PER THERM is a ce r t ified wa ter barrier.s . D-3274 numerical basis for rating thed eg ree of fungal growth or mold and dirta c c u m u l ation on paint films. Re s i st thedevelopment of mold and mildew andnot allow the growth over it ’s surfa c e .Score 9 out of 10.t. E90 Sta n d a rd Me t h od for Labo rato r yMe a s u rement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Pa rt it i o n su . E 413 Sta n d a rd Classific ation forDe te r m i n ation of Sound Tra n s m i s s i o nC l a s s .
17. NASA (National Ae ronau tics and Space Ad m i n i st ration) Te sti n g :a. N ASA 8060 .1B/C Te st 1 Flammab i l it ytest, Class A , “0” Flame Spreadb. N ASA 8060 .1C Te st 7 Tox ic Of f-gassing Te st, K ra ted (no of f-ga s s i n g ) .
18 . ABS (Americ an Bu re au ofS h i pping), IMO (Inte r nationa lMa r i n e Organization), and US CoastGuard Approval:a. IMO A. 653 (16) Flame Spre a d– p a s s e db. MSC 41 Smoke Tox ic it y– p a s s e d
19. Jap anese Te sti n g ( Jap anese Instit u teof Technology):a. JIS A 5759 Re f l e c t iv ity Light andRadiationi. Vi s u a l L i g h t Ra t i o n – 9 2 . 2 %i i . Long Wave Ra d iation (Infra re d ) – 99.5 %
20 . C h i na Ce nter for Tech n ical Te sti n g :a. National Me a s u rement M0729b. GB/T 1771-91 Re s i stance to Sa lt Fo g(2000 hours)–passedc . GB/T 1866-88 Manual Ag i n g(2000 hours)–passedd. GB/T 10834 -88 Re s i stance to Sa ltWater (1000 hours)–passede. GB/T 5219-85 Adhesion (pulling apart method) – 4.07 MPaf. GB/T 1733.93 Boiling Wate rImmersion (8 hours)–passed
21. ECAP Re po rt– F lo r i da Energy Of f ic eDENVER COLORADO LOCAT I O N
a. Reduction of 202 BTU load over roo fand wall surfaces. b. Over the 24 hour te st pe r i od, to tal cloudcover and still produced a 26% savings inenergy usage for heat /cool.c . SUPER THERM sealed and re d u c e dm o i st u re load into the surfaces andtherefore into the building.d. 25% of heating and cooling cost isdehumidification.e. S ta n d a rd building const r u c ted and coate dw ith wh ite paint re q u i red 1, 037 BTU tomaintain comfort.f. SUPER THERM coated building re q u i re d766 BTU to maintain comfort – 26-30 %savings.g. SUPER THERM reduces the He at Is l a n dEffects.
22 . ECAP Re po rt– F lo r i da Energy Of f ic e– Miami Flo r i da Lo c ation–o n ly roof wa scoated for testa. SUPER THERM reduced solar heat loadby 20-30 % .b. Reduced interior ambient te m pe rat u reof rooms by 2.3° F (with the roof coate d ) .C o n Edison re po rts that a 6° reduction int h e r m o stat will produce a 39% saving inu t i l ity cost. Provided full roof coate d , t h i scould be a 5-6° drop in ambient inside thehome giving the 39% savings.c . Solar gain on roof: Without SU P E RTHERM is 206 BT U ’s. With SUPER THERM is 85 BTU’s.d. UV absorption : Without SUPER THERMis 98.0. With SUPER THERM is 03. 0
23. ECAP Report–Florida Energy Office –La Po rte, Texas Lo c ation – Metal Shipp i n gContainersa. C o ated containers re s u lted in 46 % -52 %reduction in conduction re l ated energ yloads.b. BTU per sq. f t. per hour loads dro p pe df rom 606 BTU to 295 BTU or 311 BT Ureduction.c . I n terior ambient reg i ste red 22° c oo l e rd. Thermal conductance to outsideenvironment was 50% lesse. Ex ternal surface te m pe rat u re was 47° coo l e r.f. I n ternal surface te m pe rat u re was 37° coo l e r.g. UV absorption rate was 92% less.h . I n ternal Mo i st u re levels was 28.5% drye r.i . Un c o ated container surface moist u rereading was 68%. Coated Container was 33 % .j. To cool the container coated with SU P E RTHERM would re q u i re 46 % -52% less energ y.
k. Ex ternal Su r face Energy Flow Analy s i sshown by Tons (12 , 000 BTU) being lostt h ro u gh the ex ternal surfaces from insidethe conta i n e r. Without SUPER THERM is7.78 and with SUPER THERM is only 3.39 for a savings in to n n a ge of 4.39 tons of A/C.l . “ SUPER THERM product concerningload and reductions produced by thermalconduction, convection and abs o r p t i o nW E RE SIGNIFICANT”—re po rted by theE n e rgy Spe c ia l i st Alexander E. OthmerCEA/CBA/NDE III. m . As ex p ressed by Mr. Othmer at theconclusion of this re po rt: “This is the thirdtime we have had the pleasure to te stSUPER THERM PRO D U C TS, it is ra ret hat a single products will show such Re pe atable Re s u lts in three to ta l lyd i f fe rent environments, South Florida, De n v e r, Colorado and La Po rte, Texas a truete st i m o n ial to your products’ ENERGY STAR rat i n g.”
24. Re po rted, shown and discussed asthe only insulation mate r ial used onc o n tainer homes being built in Florida bythe B ob Vi la building show aired in2006 from Ta m p a, Flo r i da. Found onBo b Vi l a. c o m .
25. SUPER THERM used to gl ue wall boa rd sto steel st u d s in steel fa c i l ity const r u c t i o nand offer fire resistance.a. Performed by William B. GleckmanA rch ite c t, NY, NY; te sting performed byVTEC Labs, Bro n x, NY.
26. J a p a n e s e Te s t i n g r e s u l t s :a. S o ny – K oda Fa c tory: Coated one of theirbuildings with SUPER THERM andm e a s u red aga i n st year be f o re. Previous year in month of May used 3767 KW andJune used 56 47 KW. Following year after c o ating with SUPER THERM, May used 519 KW and June used 1869 KW. A 75% s avings on KW or actual cost of energ yin real dollars.b. H ita chi Electric: Roo f – Un c o ated temp wa s82° C facing sun, after coated temp was 47° Cc . Sekisui : Actual room temp cha n ge s :Un c o ated: 43° C After coating: 31° C oninterior ambient.d. Yo ko hama Ti re– Ru bber: Ac t u a li n terior room temp cha n ges: Un c o ate d :47° C and after coated: 28° C.e. Kirin Brewery: Actual interior room te m pcha n ges: Un c o ated: 63° C and after coated: 48° C.f. Pa n a s o n ic– Mat s u s h ita Electric: Roo fs u r face temp cha n ges: Un c o ated: 70° C andcoated 46° C.
27. SUPER THERM has been applied over 70 , 000 , 000 sq. f t. of roofing in Japan and allof the 70 million sq. f t. has been datalogged to ch eck pe r fo r mance (be fo reand af ter). No other insulation type material has been field te sted asex te n s ive ly as SU PER THERM.
2 8 . Japanese Government in an effort wit hS o ny Corpo ration did a joint effort with theNational Electric ity Saving Commit tee tostudy SUPER THERM and how it couldsave energy cost.a. 40 ,30 0 sq.m (434 , 636 sq. f t .) ofm a n u facturing space is chosen to coat.b. Cu rre n t ly roc k wook is used as insulat i o n .c . Fa c tory ta kes 30% of all electrical costfor A/C.d. Re s ults of Energy Saving Co st Savings was 736,704 kWh/year X 15 y e n / k Wh =11, 05 0 ,560 yen/year ($96, 092 US D ) .e. ROI (Payback pe r iod on the cost of theSU PER THERM sy stem) is 1. 06 years or 13 months.
29. Ni s s an Plant in Yokoh a ma, Jap an i s2 ,2 00 , 000 sq. f t. and coated with SU P E RTHERM.
30 . BTU te sti n g under te st method ASTM E1461-92, Thermal diffusiv ity and E12 69,differential scanning calorimeter.a. S ta n d a rd metal te st plate allowed 367. 2 0BTU to load and conduct thro u gh .b. S ta n d a rd metal te st plate with singl ec o at of SUPER THERM allowed 3.99BTU to load and conduct thro u gh .
31. Wa l - Ma rt Te sti n g performed at their own c o r po rate fa c i l ity on their own trailers. a. One trailer was the control with nothingover the roof to block heat.b. One trailer was coated with wh ite paint.c . One trailer was coated with SU P E RTHERM at 8 mils.d. One trailer was fit ted with 3 inches ofLow E (foil/bubble pack).e. One trailer was fit ted with 3 inches offiberglass.f. Me a s u rements were ta ken over thel a st full week of Au g u st in 2001.g. These were 53 foot trailers and the backd oors were left open during the te sting andplaced side by side.h . Data loggers were used to re c o rd theambient te m pe rat u res inside the tra i l e r seach day.i. Re s u lt: SUPER THERM outpe r f o r m e dc o n s i ste n t ly the other trailer ambienttemps by a minimum of 6° F and as muchas 11° F .
Challenge: No other insulation or weatherization material in the market has the facts, tests results and field studies to comparewith SUPER THERM®. There is no product in the world market with the proof of performance equal to SUPER THERM®. Forgetthe pretty brochures and advertising media and look at the facts to see the real value of SUPER THERM®.
20th Century Insulation Theory: “R”
value – load heat and then resist heat
transfer through the material.
21th Century Insulation Theory :
BLOCK HEAT LOAD. Prevent heat load
into the surface to reduce heat that is
available for transfer.
j. Wh ite paint could not throw offloading heat even though it had goodemissivity of .70.k. The Low E and fibe rglass, due to theircha ra c te r i st ics, load heat and then hold this heat wh ich develops and loadsi n to the ambient interior te m pe rat u reby the end of the day.l . As a measure of the impo rtance ofm a k i n g a 6° F drop in temp inside thet railers, a study and re po rt fro mC o n Edison on moving the thermostat6° F in a home would make a 39% sav i n g sin energy bill expense.
32. Con d e n s ation cont rola. Not only does SUPER THERM coverand control the loss and gain of heat andp ro tecting cold in ducting, due tothe ab i l ity to control the surfa c ete m pe rat u res, it controls the condensat i o nt hat would normally develop dueto the dew point oc c u rr i n g. SUPER THERM is a te sted and certified w a t e rb a rrier as well as an insulation mate r ia lt h e re f o re bl ocking the normal effect thatre l at ive hu m i d ity has with the ambientte m pe rat u re in developing the dewpoint and condensation.
33. As re po rted by the AS H RA E ( A m e r ic a nS ociety of He at i n g, Re f r i ge rating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc) in their90 .1 Co d e for wrapping metal ductingand other metal st r u c t u res. The R19- R21 Fibe rglass wra p, as shown on a cha rt in the cod e, is effe c t iv e ly only a R 7.4 dueto the inab i l ity of fibe rglass to seal the s u r face and cover effe c t iv e ly. If this wra pis compressed into po s ition as isn o r m a l ly the case when insta l l e d ,the compression will reduce theR value by 40% or more again and there -by having an effe c t ive R value of only4.4 for the 6 to 8 inches used. a. SUPER THERM covers 100% ofthe area including suppo rts andc o n f i g u rations. Not affe c ted byc o m p re s s i o n nor moist u re. Sincef i be rglass is designed to load the heat and absorb it, this is a major problem w ith h e at tra n s fer and loss as compared to SUPER THERM that is designedto prevent the “loading of heat” as the i n s u l ation method. If one bl ocks theloading of heat, then there is no heat to abs o r b, transfer and lose.
34. SU PER THERM covers all surfaces ofa wall, ro of or surfa c e, wh ich includes
the studs, braces and joi st. Tra n s fer ofh e at either being lost or gained is bl oc ked thro u gh these areas. Un l i keall the sta n d a rd insulation mate r ia l st hat are applied between studs, braces and joist and allows heat tra n s fer through these areas.
35. SU PER THERM app l i ed over air duct sand A/C boxes on the tops of roofs willm a i n tain the te m pe rat u re inside the boxto ambient instead of the 160° F it nowex pe r i e n c e s . Inside the box is wh e rethe coils are trying to unload heat.Ma kes the sy stem wo rk more effic i e n t.
36. SUPER THERM covered over theex terior concre te surfaces of walls ina nine story apartment in Mu n ich, Ge r m a ny d ropped the heating cost by 30 %. SUPER THERM seals the concre tef rom air flow and moist u re gain wh ich a re two of the pro blems with concre tesurfaces and insulation.
37. D u rab i l ity: SUPER THERM re ch e c ke dby an arch ite c t u ral firm in To kyo. Aro of ten years old was rech ec kedfor pe r fo r m ance and found tob e i d e ntical to the heat blo c k i n gability when new. The four ceramicsin SUPER THERM are designed to bl ock the loading of heat. This means that it is not just a reflector ofh e at but will not allow the loading ofh e at even when the surface becomes d i rty as ha p pened on the roof in anindustrial area.a. Later a section of roofing wh e re SUPER THERM had been applied 15 years earlier was re te sted by theJapanese Inst it u te of Te chnology andfound S olar re f l ectance ma i nta i n ed at8 4.1% af ter 15 years in a harshenvironment.b. ENERGY STAR te sting on SU PE RTHERM: Beginning was 80%. Afte rt h ree years, it was 79. 4 % . Mo st re f l e c t iv ec o atings and mate r ials listed on the te ste dp roduct listing had dro p ped by 10 %to 40% in the three year pe r i od .c . I n d e pendent te sting performed in Japan on 21 re f l ective coatings and the
ave ra ge beginning solar re f l ectance was 80 .8%. After on ly 571 days (1.5 years), the solar re f l ectance of theirs u r faces had d ropped to 54.8 % . This ist y p ical of re f l e c t ive coatings in theworld market.
38. W I N T E R: SU PER THERM hol d sh e at inside the ro om in the winte r by not loading the heat wh ich would beabs o r bed into the wall to be tra n s fe rre dand lost to the cold. The cera m ics will notload the heat and allow the normaltransfer.
39. S tops mold and mildew deve lop m e ntover its surface. Te sted and field uses over c o n c re te surfaces in car wash on bo t tom section of parking ga ra ge in the Munich Airport.
40 . S ound Pro of i n g : STC te sting conducte dby VTEC labs in NY found a rating of 50at 800 to 1300 Hz. SUPER THERMapplied at the sta n d a rd thickness of 10 mils.a. Ty p ical STC Ratings: 2x4 or 24 ”c e n ters, 3/ 8-5/8 inch wa l l bo a rd, rock wool or fibe rglass batting is 30- 42 .b. National Building Code re q u i res thatp a rt itions separating dwelling unit smeet an STC 50.
41. Ce rti f i ed as Env i ron m e nta l lySafe and He a lthy and Energy Ef f ic i e nt with Ec o- Ef fective Designa. C r a d l e t o C r a d l e D e s i g n Ce rt i f ic ation “ Gold” by MBDC LLC, wh ich is a product and process designfirm dedic ated to re volutionizing the design of products and servic e swo r l dwide that was founded by William M c Do n o u gh and Dr. Michael Brau n ga rtto pro m o te and sha pe the “Nex tI n d u st r ial Re volution" thro u gh thei n t roduction of a new design para d i g mcalled Cradle to Cradle Design and thei m p l e m e n tation of eco-effe c t ive designprinciples.b. Qualifies for LEEDS Points (Plat i n u mRating) under the The Leadership inE n e rgy and Enviro n m e n tal De s i g n(LEED) Green Building Rating Sy stem™ -the nat i o n a l ly accepted be n ch m a rk forthe design, construction, and ope ration of high performance green buildings.
No other insulation type material
has been field tested as extensively
as SUPER THERM.
10 .
11.
1. H i gh Re f l ectiv ity of Ra d i ation He atTran s fe r (sum of all three ra d iat i o nwaves) is 95% to bl ock the loading of heatonto the surface.a. U V re p r es en t s 3 % o f h e at l o a dS U PE R THERM blocks 99% of hea tgenerated by UV.b. Visual Light (short wave ra d iat i o n )re p resents 40% of heat load-S U PER THERM blocks 92% of heat genera te dby Visual Light.c . I n f ra red (long wave ra d iat i o n )re p resents 57% of heat load-S U PER THERM blocks 99% of heat genera te dby Infrared.
2. H i gh Th e r m al E m m it an c e tot h row off heat that has loaded ontoit ’s surface. S U PE R THERM has athermal emittance of 0.91.
R E G I S T R ATIONS AND CERT I F I C AT I O N S :
3. A m e r ic an Bu re au of Shipping (ABS)a. Passed SOLAS 1974 (as amended)re q u i rements for paints/finishm ate r ials requiring compliance wit hPa rts 2 (Smoke & Tox ic ity) and 5(Surface Flammability) of the IMO FTPCode, Res.MSC.61(67).b. U.S. Ty pe Ap p ro val Ce rt i f ic ateNo. SL520997-ac . E. C. Ty pe Ap p ro val Ce rt i f ic ateNo. 04-CH 468315-MED1d. U.S. Coast Guard Product ApprovalNo. 164.112/EC1347/4368315/EC0729
4. Energy Star ProgramAp p roved Pa rtner/ Ap p roved Prod u c ta. O n ly 0.6% drop in re f l e c t iv ity over a3 year roof te st pe r i od (2% over 10 years).
5. I CC (Inte r national Code Council) BOCA Legacy Report.
6 . USDA (Un ited States Dept. of Ag r ic ult u re )a. USDA approved product for useinside food facilities.
7. Marine App rovals of Wo r l d - w i d eSa lt Water and Ma r itime Us ea. DNV (Det Norske Veritas)
8 . Fa ctory Mutual App rova la. Te sted and approved for Me tal Roo f i n g
9. GSA App roval for Fed e ral Us e sUL (Un d e r w r iters Labo rato r y, Inc.)approvalECAP Re po rt: Energy Con s e r vationA s s i stance Prog ra m D e p a rt m e nt ofE n e rg y -Un ited States of Americ a -Florida Energy Office
12 . S tate of Ca l i fornia Co ol Ro of Prog ra ma. Approved and listed
13. S tate of Ca l i fornia Bu re au of Hom eFurnishings and Th e r mal Insulationa. License Number TE 1392
14. S tate of Flo r i da Energy Re b atePrograma. Qualifies for a pe rc e n ta ge re d u c t i o nf rom cost of coating subst rate s
15. Su pe r ior Pro d u cts Inte r national II,Inc. is an active member of the NRCA ( National Ro ofing Cont ra ctors Assoc)
16. A S T M T E S T L I S T I N G S :
a. B117/D 1654 Salt Fog (400 hours and2000 hours)–passedb . C 2 3 6 - 8 9 ( 9 3 ) T h e r m a lTr a n s m i t t a n c e / C o n d u c t a n c ei. Fiberglass 0.52 Ki i . SUPER THERM in one coat 0.31 Ki i i . SUPER THERM in two coats 0.21 Kc . C 411 High -Te m pe rat u re Su r fa c ePerformance
d. C 412 Tensile Pro pe rt i e s–444 psie. D 522 Ma n d rel Bend on metal orrubber materialsf. D 1653 Water Va por Pe r m e ab i l ity 3%g. D 3273-82T/ D3274 Fu n gal Re s i sta n c eh .D 4 0 6 0 Ab r a s i o n Re s i s t a n c ei . E 84/NFPA 255/ U L 723/ U BC 42-1/ANSI2.5/FM E 84 – Flame Spread /Smoke–“0” Class A or 1j. E 84-89 Flame spread/ SmokeDe v e l o p m e n t–Flame “0” and Smoke “0”k. E 96 Water Va por Tra n s m i s s i o n –Less than .01l . E 108 Flame Spread on Pitched Roo f–passedm .E 9 03-96 Spe c t ral Re f l e c tance 80 %and 0.6% loss after three ye a r sweathering.n . E 12 69 He at Ca p a c ity by Diffe re n t ia lScanning Colorimetero. E 1461 (92) Th e r m a l D i f f u s iv ity/ C o n d u c t iv ity by Flash Me t h od – re d u c e d367.20 BTU conduction to 3.99
p. G 53 1000 hours UV Ex po s e dq. D 7088 (Su perseded Fe d e ral S pe c i f ic ation TT- P-1411A Paint) hydro -stat ic pre s s u re re s i stance of a submit te dwater proof coating over concre te inte r i o rs u r face to prevent ex terior rain driv e nwater from pe n e t rating the wall fro mex terior to interior during const r u c t i o n .r. D 6904 re s i stance to wind driven ra i nfor ex terior coatings applied to masonryw ithout bl ock filler in te st bl oc k s .Su perseded Fe d e ral Spe c i f ic ation TT-C -555 B. S U PER THERM is a ce r t ified wa ter barrier.s . D-3274 numerical basis for rating thed eg ree of fungal growth or mold and dirta c c u m u l ation on paint films. Re s i st thedevelopment of mold and mildew andnot allow the growth over it ’s surfa c e .Score 9 out of 10.t. E90 Sta n d a rd Me t h od for Labo rato r yMe a s u rement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Pa rt it i o n su . E 413 Sta n d a rd Classific ation forDe te r m i n ation of Sound Tra n s m i s s i o nC l a s s .
17. NASA (National Ae ronau tics and Space Ad m i n i st ration) Te sti n g :a. N ASA 8060 .1B/C Te st 1 Flammab i l it ytest, Class A , “0” Flame Spreadb. N ASA 8060 .1C Te st 7 Tox ic Of f-gassing Te st, K ra ted (no of f-ga s s i n g ) .
18 . ABS (Americ an Bu re au ofS h i pping), IMO (Inte r nationa lMa r i n e Organization), and US CoastGuard Approval:a. IMO A. 653 (16) Flame Spre a d– p a s s e db. MSC 41 Smoke Tox ic it y– p a s s e d
19. Jap anese Te sti n g ( Jap anese Instit u teof Technology):a. JIS A 5759 Re f l e c t iv ity Light andRadiationi. Vi s u a l L i g h t Ra t i o n – 9 2 . 2 %i i . Long Wave Ra d iation (Infra re d ) – 99.5 %
20 . C h i na Ce nter for Tech n ical Te sti n g :a. National Me a s u rement M0729b. GB/T 1771-91 Re s i stance to Sa lt Fo g(2000 hours)–passedc . GB/T 1866-88 Manual Ag i n g(2000 hours)–passedd. GB/T 10834 -88 Re s i stance to Sa ltWater (1000 hours)–passede. GB/T 5219-85 Adhesion (pulling apart method) – 4.07 MPaf. GB/T 1733.93 Boiling Wate rImmersion (8 hours)–passed
21. ECAP Re po rt– F lo r i da Energy Of f ic eDENVER COLORADO LOCAT I O N
a. Reduction of 202 BTU load over roo fand wall surfaces. b. Over the 24 hour te st pe r i od, to tal cloudcover and still produced a 26% savings inenergy usage for heat /cool.c . SUPER THERM sealed and re d u c e dm o i st u re load into the surfaces andtherefore into the building.d. 25% of heating and cooling cost isdehumidification.e. S ta n d a rd building const r u c ted and coate dw ith wh ite paint re q u i red 1, 037 BTU tomaintain comfort.f. SUPER THERM coated building re q u i re d766 BTU to maintain comfort – 26-30 %savings.g. SUPER THERM reduces the He at Is l a n dEffects.
22 . ECAP Re po rt– F lo r i da Energy Of f ic e– Miami Flo r i da Lo c ation–o n ly roof wa scoated for testa. SUPER THERM reduced solar heat loadby 20-30 % .b. Reduced interior ambient te m pe rat u reof rooms by 2.3° F (with the roof coate d ) .C o n Edison re po rts that a 6° reduction int h e r m o stat will produce a 39% saving inu t i l ity cost. Provided full roof coate d , t h i scould be a 5-6° drop in ambient inside thehome giving the 39% savings.c . Solar gain on roof: Without SU P E RTHERM is 206 BT U ’s. With SUPER THERM is 85 BTU’s.d. UV absorption : Without SUPER THERMis 98.0. With SUPER THERM is 03. 0
23. ECAP Report–Florida Energy Office –La Po rte, Texas Lo c ation – Metal Shipp i n gContainersa. C o ated containers re s u lted in 46 % -52 %reduction in conduction re l ated energ yloads.b. BTU per sq. f t. per hour loads dro p pe df rom 606 BTU to 295 BTU or 311 BT Ureduction.c . I n terior ambient reg i ste red 22° c oo l e rd. Thermal conductance to outsideenvironment was 50% lesse. Ex ternal surface te m pe rat u re was 47° coo l e r.f. I n ternal surface te m pe rat u re was 37° coo l e r.g. UV absorption rate was 92% less.h . I n ternal Mo i st u re levels was 28.5% drye r.i . Un c o ated container surface moist u rereading was 68%. Coated Container was 33 % .j. To cool the container coated with SU P E RTHERM would re q u i re 46 % -52% less energ y.
k. Ex ternal Su r face Energy Flow Analy s i sshown by Tons (12 , 000 BTU) being lostt h ro u gh the ex ternal surfaces from insidethe conta i n e r. Without SUPER THERM is7.78 and with SUPER THERM is only 3.39 for a savings in to n n a ge of 4.39 tons of A/C.l . “ SUPER THERM product concerningload and reductions produced by thermalconduction, convection and abs o r p t i o nW E RE SIGNIFICANT”—re po rted by theE n e rgy Spe c ia l i st Alexander E. OthmerCEA/CBA/NDE III. m . As ex p ressed by Mr. Othmer at theconclusion of this re po rt: “This is the thirdtime we have had the pleasure to te stSUPER THERM PRO D U C TS, it is ra ret hat a single products will show such Re pe atable Re s u lts in three to ta l lyd i f fe rent environments, South Florida, De n v e r, Colorado and La Po rte, Texas a truete st i m o n ial to your products’ ENERGY STAR rat i n g.”
24. Re po rted, shown and discussed asthe only insulation mate r ial used onc o n tainer homes being built in Florida bythe B ob Vi la building show aired in2006 from Ta m p a, Flo r i da. Found onBo b Vi l a. c o m .
25. SUPER THERM used to gl ue wall boa rd sto steel st u d s in steel fa c i l ity const r u c t i o nand offer fire resistance.a. Performed by William B. GleckmanA rch ite c t, NY, NY; te sting performed byVTEC Labs, Bro n x, NY.
26. J a p a n e s e Te s t i n g r e s u l t s :a. S o ny – K oda Fa c tory: Coated one of theirbuildings with SUPER THERM andm e a s u red aga i n st year be f o re. Previous year in month of May used 3767 KW andJune used 56 47 KW. Following year after c o ating with SUPER THERM, May used 519 KW and June used 1869 KW. A 75% s avings on KW or actual cost of energ yin real dollars.b. H ita chi Electric: Roo f – Un c o ated temp wa s82° C facing sun, after coated temp was 47° Cc . Sekisui : Actual room temp cha n ge s :Un c o ated: 43° C After coating: 31° C oninterior ambient.d. Yo ko hama Ti re– Ru bber: Ac t u a li n terior room temp cha n ges: Un c o ate d :47° C and after coated: 28° C.e. Kirin Brewery: Actual interior room te m pcha n ges: Un c o ated: 63° C and after coated: 48° C.f. Pa n a s o n ic– Mat s u s h ita Electric: Roo fs u r face temp cha n ges: Un c o ated: 70° C andcoated 46° C.
27. SUPER THERM has been applied over 70 , 000 , 000 sq. f t. of roofing in Japan and allof the 70 million sq. f t. has been datalogged to ch eck pe r fo r mance (be fo reand af ter). No other insulation type material has been field te sted asex te n s ive ly as SU PER THERM.
2 8 . Japanese Government in an effort wit hS o ny Corpo ration did a joint effort with theNational Electric ity Saving Commit tee tostudy SUPER THERM and how it couldsave energy cost.a. 40 ,30 0 sq.m (434 , 636 sq. f t .) ofm a n u facturing space is chosen to coat.b. Cu rre n t ly roc k wook is used as insulat i o n .c . Fa c tory ta kes 30% of all electrical costfor A/C.d. Re s ults of Energy Saving Co st Savings was 736,704 kWh/year X 15 y e n / k Wh =11, 05 0 ,560 yen/year ($96, 092 US D ) .e. ROI (Payback pe r iod on the cost of theSU PER THERM sy stem) is 1. 06 years or 13 months.
29. Ni s s an Plant in Yokoh a ma, Jap an i s2 ,2 00 , 000 sq. f t. and coated with SU P E RTHERM.
30 . BTU te sti n g under te st method ASTM E1461-92, Thermal diffusiv ity and E12 69,differential scanning calorimeter.a. S ta n d a rd metal te st plate allowed 367. 2 0BTU to load and conduct thro u gh .b. S ta n d a rd metal te st plate with singl ec o at of SUPER THERM allowed 3.99BTU to load and conduct thro u gh .
31. Wa l - Ma rt Te sti n g performed at their own c o r po rate fa c i l ity on their own trailers. a. One trailer was the control with nothingover the roof to block heat.b. One trailer was coated with wh ite paint.c . One trailer was coated with SU P E RTHERM at 8 mils.d. One trailer was fit ted with 3 inches ofLow E (foil/bubble pack).e. One trailer was fit ted with 3 inches offiberglass.f. Me a s u rements were ta ken over thel a st full week of Au g u st in 2001.g. These were 53 foot trailers and the backd oors were left open during the te sting andplaced side by side.h . Data loggers were used to re c o rd theambient te m pe rat u res inside the tra i l e r seach day.i. Re s u lt: SUPER THERM outpe r f o r m e dc o n s i ste n t ly the other trailer ambienttemps by a minimum of 6° F and as muchas 11° F .
Challenge: No other insulation or weatherization material in the market has the facts, tests results and field studies to comparewith SUPER THERM®. There is no product in the world market with the proof of performance equal to SUPER THERM®. Forgetthe pretty brochures and advertising media and look at the facts to see the real value of SUPER THERM®.
20th Century Insulation Theory: “R”
value – load heat and then resist heat
transfer through the material.
21th Century Insulation Theory :
BLOCK HEAT LOAD. Prevent heat load
into the surface to reduce heat that is
available for transfer.
j. Wh ite paint could not throw offloading heat even though it had goodemissivity of .70.k. The Low E and fibe rglass, due to theircha ra c te r i st ics, load heat and then hold this heat wh ich develops and loadsi n to the ambient interior te m pe rat u reby the end of the day.l . As a measure of the impo rtance ofm a k i n g a 6° F drop in temp inside thet railers, a study and re po rt fro mC o n Edison on moving the thermostat6° F in a home would make a 39% sav i n g sin energy bill expense.
32. Con d e n s ation cont rola. Not only does SUPER THERM coverand control the loss and gain of heat andp ro tecting cold in ducting, due tothe ab i l ity to control the surfa c ete m pe rat u res, it controls the condensat i o nt hat would normally develop dueto the dew point oc c u rr i n g. SUPER THERM is a te sted and certified w a t e rb a rrier as well as an insulation mate r ia lt h e re f o re bl ocking the normal effect thatre l at ive hu m i d ity has with the ambientte m pe rat u re in developing the dewpoint and condensation.
33. As re po rted by the AS H RA E ( A m e r ic a nS ociety of He at i n g, Re f r i ge rating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc) in their90 .1 Co d e for wrapping metal ductingand other metal st r u c t u res. The R19- R21 Fibe rglass wra p, as shown on a cha rt in the cod e, is effe c t iv e ly only a R 7.4 dueto the inab i l ity of fibe rglass to seal the s u r face and cover effe c t iv e ly. If this wra pis compressed into po s ition as isn o r m a l ly the case when insta l l e d ,the compression will reduce theR value by 40% or more again and there -by having an effe c t ive R value of only4.4 for the 6 to 8 inches used. a. SUPER THERM covers 100% ofthe area including suppo rts andc o n f i g u rations. Not affe c ted byc o m p re s s i o n nor moist u re. Sincef i be rglass is designed to load the heat and absorb it, this is a major problem w ith h e at tra n s fer and loss as compared to SUPER THERM that is designedto prevent the “loading of heat” as the i n s u l ation method. If one bl ocks theloading of heat, then there is no heat to abs o r b, transfer and lose.
34. SU PER THERM covers all surfaces ofa wall, ro of or surfa c e, wh ich includes
the studs, braces and joi st. Tra n s fer ofh e at either being lost or gained is bl oc ked thro u gh these areas. Un l i keall the sta n d a rd insulation mate r ia l st hat are applied between studs, braces and joist and allows heat tra n s fer through these areas.
35. SU PER THERM app l i ed over air duct sand A/C boxes on the tops of roofs willm a i n tain the te m pe rat u re inside the boxto ambient instead of the 160° F it nowex pe r i e n c e s . Inside the box is wh e rethe coils are trying to unload heat.Ma kes the sy stem wo rk more effic i e n t.
36. SUPER THERM covered over theex terior concre te surfaces of walls ina nine story apartment in Mu n ich, Ge r m a ny d ropped the heating cost by 30 %. SUPER THERM seals the concre tef rom air flow and moist u re gain wh ich a re two of the pro blems with concre tesurfaces and insulation.
37. D u rab i l ity: SUPER THERM re ch e c ke dby an arch ite c t u ral firm in To kyo. Aro of ten years old was rech ec kedfor pe r fo r m ance and found tob e i d e ntical to the heat blo c k i n gability when new. The four ceramicsin SUPER THERM are designed to bl ock the loading of heat. This means that it is not just a reflector ofh e at but will not allow the loading ofh e at even when the surface becomes d i rty as ha p pened on the roof in anindustrial area.a. Later a section of roofing wh e re SUPER THERM had been applied 15 years earlier was re te sted by theJapanese Inst it u te of Te chnology andfound S olar re f l ectance ma i nta i n ed at8 4.1% af ter 15 years in a harshenvironment.b. ENERGY STAR te sting on SU PE RTHERM: Beginning was 80%. Afte rt h ree years, it was 79. 4 % . Mo st re f l e c t iv ec o atings and mate r ials listed on the te ste dp roduct listing had dro p ped by 10 %to 40% in the three year pe r i od .c . I n d e pendent te sting performed in Japan on 21 re f l ective coatings and the
ave ra ge beginning solar re f l ectance was 80 .8%. After on ly 571 days (1.5 years), the solar re f l ectance of theirs u r faces had d ropped to 54.8 % . This ist y p ical of re f l e c t ive coatings in theworld market.
38. W I N T E R: SU PER THERM hol d sh e at inside the ro om in the winte r by not loading the heat wh ich would beabs o r bed into the wall to be tra n s fe rre dand lost to the cold. The cera m ics will notload the heat and allow the normaltransfer.
39. S tops mold and mildew deve lop m e ntover its surface. Te sted and field uses over c o n c re te surfaces in car wash on bo t tom section of parking ga ra ge in the Munich Airport.
40 . S ound Pro of i n g : STC te sting conducte dby VTEC labs in NY found a rating of 50at 800 to 1300 Hz. SUPER THERMapplied at the sta n d a rd thickness of 10 mils.a. Ty p ical STC Ratings: 2x4 or 24 ”c e n ters, 3/ 8-5/8 inch wa l l bo a rd, rock wool or fibe rglass batting is 30- 42 .b. National Building Code re q u i res thatp a rt itions separating dwelling unit smeet an STC 50.
41. Ce rti f i ed as Env i ron m e nta l lySafe and He a lthy and Energy Ef f ic i e nt with Ec o- Ef fective Designa. C r a d l e t o C r a d l e D e s i g n Ce rt i f ic ation “ Gold” by MBDC LLC, wh ich is a product and process designfirm dedic ated to re volutionizing the design of products and servic e swo r l dwide that was founded by William M c Do n o u gh and Dr. Michael Brau n ga rtto pro m o te and sha pe the “Nex tI n d u st r ial Re volution" thro u gh thei n t roduction of a new design para d i g mcalled Cradle to Cradle Design and thei m p l e m e n tation of eco-effe c t ive designprinciples.b. Qualifies for LEEDS Points (Plat i n u mRating) under the The Leadership inE n e rgy and Enviro n m e n tal De s i g n(LEED) Green Building Rating Sy stem™ -the nat i o n a l ly accepted be n ch m a rk forthe design, construction, and ope ration of high performance green buildings.
No other insulation type material
has been field tested as extensively
as SUPER THERM.
10 .
11.
1. H i gh Re f l ectiv ity of Ra d i ation He atTran s fe r (sum of all three ra d iat i o nwaves) is 95% to bl ock the loading of heatonto the surface.a. U V re p r es en t s 3 % o f h e at l o a dS U PE R THERM blocks 99% of hea tgenerated by UV.b. Visual Light (short wave ra d iat i o n )re p resents 40% of heat load-S U PER THERM blocks 92% of heat genera te dby Visual Light.c . I n f ra red (long wave ra d iat i o n )re p resents 57% of heat load-S U PER THERM blocks 99% of heat genera te dby Infrared.
2. H i gh Th e r m al E m m it an c e tot h row off heat that has loaded ontoit ’s surface. S U PE R THERM has athermal emittance of 0.91.
R E G I S T R ATIONS AND CERT I F I C AT I O N S :
3. A m e r ic an Bu re au of Shipping (ABS)a. Passed SOLAS 1974 (as amended)re q u i rements for paints/finishm ate r ials requiring compliance wit hPa rts 2 (Smoke & Tox ic ity) and 5(Surface Flammability) of the IMO FTPCode, Res.MSC.61(67).b. U.S. Ty pe Ap p ro val Ce rt i f ic ateNo. SL520997-ac . E. C. Ty pe Ap p ro val Ce rt i f ic ateNo. 04-CH 468315-MED1d. U.S. Coast Guard Product ApprovalNo. 164.112/EC1347/4368315/EC0729
4. Energy Star ProgramAp p roved Pa rtner/ Ap p roved Prod u c ta. O n ly 0.6% drop in re f l e c t iv ity over a3 year roof te st pe r i od (2% over 10 years).
5. I CC (Inte r national Code Council) BOCA Legacy Report.
6 . USDA (Un ited States Dept. of Ag r ic ult u re )a. USDA approved product for useinside food facilities.
7. Marine App rovals of Wo r l d - w i d eSa lt Water and Ma r itime Us ea. DNV (Det Norske Veritas)
8 . Fa ctory Mutual App rova la. Te sted and approved for Me tal Roo f i n g
9. GSA App roval for Fed e ral Us e sUL (Un d e r w r iters Labo rato r y, Inc.)approvalECAP Re po rt: Energy Con s e r vationA s s i stance Prog ra m D e p a rt m e nt ofE n e rg y -Un ited States of Americ a -Florida Energy Office
12 . S tate of Ca l i fornia Co ol Ro of Prog ra ma. Approved and listed
13. S tate of Ca l i fornia Bu re au of Hom eFurnishings and Th e r mal Insulationa. License Number TE 1392
14. S tate of Flo r i da Energy Re b atePrograma. Qualifies for a pe rc e n ta ge re d u c t i o nf rom cost of coating subst rate s
15. Su pe r ior Pro d u cts Inte r national II,Inc. is an active member of the NRCA ( National Ro ofing Cont ra ctors Assoc)
16. A S T M T E S T L I S T I N G S :
a. B117/D 1654 Salt Fog (400 hours and2000 hours)–passedb . C 2 3 6 - 8 9 ( 9 3 ) T h e r m a lTr a n s m i t t a n c e / C o n d u c t a n c ei. Fiberglass 0.52 Ki i . SUPER THERM in one coat 0.31 Ki i i . SUPER THERM in two coats 0.21 Kc . C 411 High -Te m pe rat u re Su r fa c ePerformance
d. C 412 Tensile Pro pe rt i e s–444 psie. D 522 Ma n d rel Bend on metal orrubber materialsf. D 1653 Water Va por Pe r m e ab i l ity 3%g. D 3273-82T/ D3274 Fu n gal Re s i sta n c eh .D 4 0 6 0 Ab r a s i o n Re s i s t a n c ei . E 84/NFPA 255/ U L 723/ U BC 42-1/ANSI2.5/FM E 84 – Flame Spread /Smoke–“0” Class A or 1j. E 84-89 Flame spread/ SmokeDe v e l o p m e n t–Flame “0” and Smoke “0”k. E 96 Water Va por Tra n s m i s s i o n –Less than .01l . E 108 Flame Spread on Pitched Roo f–passedm .E 9 03-96 Spe c t ral Re f l e c tance 80 %and 0.6% loss after three ye a r sweathering.n . E 12 69 He at Ca p a c ity by Diffe re n t ia lScanning Colorimetero. E 1461 (92) Th e r m a l D i f f u s iv ity/ C o n d u c t iv ity by Flash Me t h od – re d u c e d367.20 BTU conduction to 3.99
p. G 53 1000 hours UV Ex po s e dq. D 7088 (Su perseded Fe d e ral S pe c i f ic ation TT- P-1411A Paint) hydro -stat ic pre s s u re re s i stance of a submit te dwater proof coating over concre te inte r i o rs u r face to prevent ex terior rain driv e nwater from pe n e t rating the wall fro mex terior to interior during const r u c t i o n .r. D 6904 re s i stance to wind driven ra i nfor ex terior coatings applied to masonryw ithout bl ock filler in te st bl oc k s .Su perseded Fe d e ral Spe c i f ic ation TT-C -555 B. S U PER THERM is a ce r t ified wa ter barrier.s . D-3274 numerical basis for rating thed eg ree of fungal growth or mold and dirta c c u m u l ation on paint films. Re s i st thedevelopment of mold and mildew andnot allow the growth over it ’s surfa c e .Score 9 out of 10.t. E90 Sta n d a rd Me t h od for Labo rato r yMe a s u rement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Pa rt it i o n su . E 413 Sta n d a rd Classific ation forDe te r m i n ation of Sound Tra n s m i s s i o nC l a s s .
17. NASA (National Ae ronau tics and Space Ad m i n i st ration) Te sti n g :a. N ASA 8060 .1B/C Te st 1 Flammab i l it ytest, Class A , “0” Flame Spreadb. N ASA 8060 .1C Te st 7 Tox ic Of f-gassing Te st, K ra ted (no of f-ga s s i n g ) .
18 . ABS (Americ an Bu re au ofS h i pping), IMO (Inte r nationa lMa r i n e Organization), and US CoastGuard Approval:a. IMO A. 653 (16) Flame Spre a d– p a s s e db. MSC 41 Smoke Tox ic it y– p a s s e d
19. Jap anese Te sti n g ( Jap anese Instit u teof Technology):a. JIS A 5759 Re f l e c t iv ity Light andRadiationi. Vi s u a l L i g h t Ra t i o n – 9 2 . 2 %i i . Long Wave Ra d iation (Infra re d ) – 99.5 %
20 . C h i na Ce nter for Tech n ical Te sti n g :a. National Me a s u rement M0729b. GB/T 1771-91 Re s i stance to Sa lt Fo g(2000 hours)–passedc . GB/T 1866-88 Manual Ag i n g(2000 hours)–passedd. GB/T 10834 -88 Re s i stance to Sa ltWater (1000 hours)–passede. GB/T 5219-85 Adhesion (pulling apart method) – 4.07 MPaf. GB/T 1733.93 Boiling Wate rImmersion (8 hours)–passed
21. ECAP Re po rt– F lo r i da Energy Of f ic eDENVER COLORADO LOCAT I O N
a. Reduction of 202 BTU load over roo fand wall surfaces. b. Over the 24 hour te st pe r i od, to tal cloudcover and still produced a 26% savings inenergy usage for heat /cool.c . SUPER THERM sealed and re d u c e dm o i st u re load into the surfaces andtherefore into the building.d. 25% of heating and cooling cost isdehumidification.e. S ta n d a rd building const r u c ted and coate dw ith wh ite paint re q u i red 1, 037 BTU tomaintain comfort.f. SUPER THERM coated building re q u i re d766 BTU to maintain comfort – 26-30 %savings.g. SUPER THERM reduces the He at Is l a n dEffects.
22 . ECAP Re po rt– F lo r i da Energy Of f ic e– Miami Flo r i da Lo c ation–o n ly roof wa scoated for testa. SUPER THERM reduced solar heat loadby 20-30 % .b. Reduced interior ambient te m pe rat u reof rooms by 2.3° F (with the roof coate d ) .C o n Edison re po rts that a 6° reduction int h e r m o stat will produce a 39% saving inu t i l ity cost. Provided full roof coate d , t h i scould be a 5-6° drop in ambient inside thehome giving the 39% savings.c . Solar gain on roof: Without SU P E RTHERM is 206 BT U ’s. With SUPER THERM is 85 BTU’s.d. UV absorption : Without SUPER THERMis 98.0. With SUPER THERM is 03. 0
23. ECAP Report–Florida Energy Office –La Po rte, Texas Lo c ation – Metal Shipp i n gContainersa. C o ated containers re s u lted in 46 % -52 %reduction in conduction re l ated energ yloads.b. BTU per sq. f t. per hour loads dro p pe df rom 606 BTU to 295 BTU or 311 BT Ureduction.c . I n terior ambient reg i ste red 22° c oo l e rd. Thermal conductance to outsideenvironment was 50% lesse. Ex ternal surface te m pe rat u re was 47° coo l e r.f. I n ternal surface te m pe rat u re was 37° coo l e r.g. UV absorption rate was 92% less.h . I n ternal Mo i st u re levels was 28.5% drye r.i . Un c o ated container surface moist u rereading was 68%. Coated Container was 33 % .j. To cool the container coated with SU P E RTHERM would re q u i re 46 % -52% less energ y.
k. Ex ternal Su r face Energy Flow Analy s i sshown by Tons (12 , 000 BTU) being lostt h ro u gh the ex ternal surfaces from insidethe conta i n e r. Without SUPER THERM is7.78 and with SUPER THERM is only 3.39 for a savings in to n n a ge of 4.39 tons of A/C.l . “ SUPER THERM product concerningload and reductions produced by thermalconduction, convection and abs o r p t i o nW E RE SIGNIFICANT”—re po rted by theE n e rgy Spe c ia l i st Alexander E. OthmerCEA/CBA/NDE III. m . As ex p ressed by Mr. Othmer at theconclusion of this re po rt: “This is the thirdtime we have had the pleasure to te stSUPER THERM PRO D U C TS, it is ra ret hat a single products will show such Re pe atable Re s u lts in three to ta l lyd i f fe rent environments, South Florida, De n v e r, Colorado and La Po rte, Texas a truete st i m o n ial to your products’ ENERGY STAR rat i n g.”
24. Re po rted, shown and discussed asthe only insulation mate r ial used onc o n tainer homes being built in Florida bythe B ob Vi la building show aired in2006 from Ta m p a, Flo r i da. Found onBo b Vi l a. c o m .
25. SUPER THERM used to gl ue wall boa rd sto steel st u d s in steel fa c i l ity const r u c t i o nand offer fire resistance.a. Performed by William B. GleckmanA rch ite c t, NY, NY; te sting performed byVTEC Labs, Bro n x, NY.
26. J a p a n e s e Te s t i n g r e s u l t s :a. S o ny – K oda Fa c tory: Coated one of theirbuildings with SUPER THERM andm e a s u red aga i n st year be f o re. Previous year in month of May used 3767 KW andJune used 56 47 KW. Following year after c o ating with SUPER THERM, May used 519 KW and June used 1869 KW. A 75% s avings on KW or actual cost of energ yin real dollars.b. H ita chi Electric: Roo f – Un c o ated temp wa s82° C facing sun, after coated temp was 47° Cc . Sekisui : Actual room temp cha n ge s :Un c o ated: 43° C After coating: 31° C oninterior ambient.d. Yo ko hama Ti re– Ru bber: Ac t u a li n terior room temp cha n ges: Un c o ate d :47° C and after coated: 28° C.e. Kirin Brewery: Actual interior room te m pcha n ges: Un c o ated: 63° C and after coated: 48° C.f. Pa n a s o n ic– Mat s u s h ita Electric: Roo fs u r face temp cha n ges: Un c o ated: 70° C andcoated 46° C.
27. SUPER THERM has been applied over 70 , 000 , 000 sq. f t. of roofing in Japan and allof the 70 million sq. f t. has been datalogged to ch eck pe r fo r mance (be fo reand af ter). No other insulation type material has been field te sted asex te n s ive ly as SU PER THERM.
2 8 . Japanese Government in an effort wit hS o ny Corpo ration did a joint effort with theNational Electric ity Saving Commit tee tostudy SUPER THERM and how it couldsave energy cost.a. 40 ,30 0 sq.m (434 , 636 sq. f t .) ofm a n u facturing space is chosen to coat.b. Cu rre n t ly roc k wook is used as insulat i o n .c . Fa c tory ta kes 30% of all electrical costfor A/C.d. Re s ults of Energy Saving Co st Savings was 736,704 kWh/year X 15 y e n / k Wh =11, 05 0 ,560 yen/year ($96, 092 US D ) .e. ROI (Payback pe r iod on the cost of theSU PER THERM sy stem) is 1. 06 years or 13 months.
29. Ni s s an Plant in Yokoh a ma, Jap an i s2 ,2 00 , 000 sq. f t. and coated with SU P E RTHERM.
30 . BTU te sti n g under te st method ASTM E1461-92, Thermal diffusiv ity and E12 69,differential scanning calorimeter.a. S ta n d a rd metal te st plate allowed 367. 2 0BTU to load and conduct thro u gh .b. S ta n d a rd metal te st plate with singl ec o at of SUPER THERM allowed 3.99BTU to load and conduct thro u gh .
31. Wa l - Ma rt Te sti n g performed at their own c o r po rate fa c i l ity on their own trailers. a. One trailer was the control with nothingover the roof to block heat.b. One trailer was coated with wh ite paint.c . One trailer was coated with SU P E RTHERM at 8 mils.d. One trailer was fit ted with 3 inches ofLow E (foil/bubble pack).e. One trailer was fit ted with 3 inches offiberglass.f. Me a s u rements were ta ken over thel a st full week of Au g u st in 2001.g. These were 53 foot trailers and the backd oors were left open during the te sting andplaced side by side.h . Data loggers were used to re c o rd theambient te m pe rat u res inside the tra i l e r seach day.i. Re s u lt: SUPER THERM outpe r f o r m e dc o n s i ste n t ly the other trailer ambienttemps by a minimum of 6° F and as muchas 11° F .
Challenge: No other insulation or weatherization material in the market has the facts, tests results and field studies to comparewith SUPER THERM®. There is no product in the world market with the proof of performance equal to SUPER THERM®. Forgetthe pretty brochures and advertising media and look at the facts to see the real value of SUPER THERM®.
20th Century Insulation Theory: “R”
value – load heat and then resist heat
transfer through the material.
21th Century Insulation Theory :
BLOCK HEAT LOAD. Prevent heat load
into the surface to reduce heat that is
available for transfer.
j. Wh ite paint could not throw offloading heat even though it had goodemissivity of .70.k. The Low E and fibe rglass, due to theircha ra c te r i st ics, load heat and then hold this heat wh ich develops and loadsi n to the ambient interior te m pe rat u reby the end of the day.l . As a measure of the impo rtance ofm a k i n g a 6° F drop in temp inside thet railers, a study and re po rt fro mC o n Edison on moving the thermostat6° F in a home would make a 39% sav i n g sin energy bill expense.
32. Con d e n s ation cont rola. Not only does SUPER THERM coverand control the loss and gain of heat andp ro tecting cold in ducting, due tothe ab i l ity to control the surfa c ete m pe rat u res, it controls the condensat i o nt hat would normally develop dueto the dew point oc c u rr i n g. SUPER THERM is a te sted and certified w a t e rb a rrier as well as an insulation mate r ia lt h e re f o re bl ocking the normal effect thatre l at ive hu m i d ity has with the ambientte m pe rat u re in developing the dewpoint and condensation.
33. As re po rted by the AS H RA E ( A m e r ic a nS ociety of He at i n g, Re f r i ge rating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc) in their90 .1 Co d e for wrapping metal ductingand other metal st r u c t u res. The R19- R21 Fibe rglass wra p, as shown on a cha rt in the cod e, is effe c t iv e ly only a R 7.4 dueto the inab i l ity of fibe rglass to seal the s u r face and cover effe c t iv e ly. If this wra pis compressed into po s ition as isn o r m a l ly the case when insta l l e d ,the compression will reduce theR value by 40% or more again and there -by having an effe c t ive R value of only4.4 for the 6 to 8 inches used. a. SUPER THERM covers 100% ofthe area including suppo rts andc o n f i g u rations. Not affe c ted byc o m p re s s i o n nor moist u re. Sincef i be rglass is designed to load the heat and absorb it, this is a major problem w ith h e at tra n s fer and loss as compared to SUPER THERM that is designedto prevent the “loading of heat” as the i n s u l ation method. If one bl ocks theloading of heat, then there is no heat to abs o r b, transfer and lose.
34. SU PER THERM covers all surfaces ofa wall, ro of or surfa c e, wh ich includes
the studs, braces and joi st. Tra n s fer ofh e at either being lost or gained is bl oc ked thro u gh these areas. Un l i keall the sta n d a rd insulation mate r ia l st hat are applied between studs, braces and joist and allows heat tra n s fer through these areas.
35. SU PER THERM app l i ed over air duct sand A/C boxes on the tops of roofs willm a i n tain the te m pe rat u re inside the boxto ambient instead of the 160° F it nowex pe r i e n c e s . Inside the box is wh e rethe coils are trying to unload heat.Ma kes the sy stem wo rk more effic i e n t.
36. SUPER THERM covered over theex terior concre te surfaces of walls ina nine story apartment in Mu n ich, Ge r m a ny d ropped the heating cost by 30 %. SUPER THERM seals the concre tef rom air flow and moist u re gain wh ich a re two of the pro blems with concre tesurfaces and insulation.
37. D u rab i l ity: SUPER THERM re ch e c ke dby an arch ite c t u ral firm in To kyo. Aro of ten years old was rech ec kedfor pe r fo r m ance and found tob e i d e ntical to the heat blo c k i n gability when new. The four ceramicsin SUPER THERM are designed to bl ock the loading of heat. This means that it is not just a reflector ofh e at but will not allow the loading ofh e at even when the surface becomes d i rty as ha p pened on the roof in anindustrial area.a. Later a section of roofing wh e re SUPER THERM had been applied 15 years earlier was re te sted by theJapanese Inst it u te of Te chnology andfound S olar re f l ectance ma i nta i n ed at8 4.1% af ter 15 years in a harshenvironment.b. ENERGY STAR te sting on SU PE RTHERM: Beginning was 80%. Afte rt h ree years, it was 79. 4 % . Mo st re f l e c t iv ec o atings and mate r ials listed on the te ste dp roduct listing had dro p ped by 10 %to 40% in the three year pe r i od .c . I n d e pendent te sting performed in Japan on 21 re f l ective coatings and the
ave ra ge beginning solar re f l ectance was 80 .8%. After on ly 571 days (1.5 years), the solar re f l ectance of theirs u r faces had d ropped to 54.8 % . This ist y p ical of re f l e c t ive coatings in theworld market.
38. W I N T E R: SU PER THERM hol d sh e at inside the ro om in the winte r by not loading the heat wh ich would beabs o r bed into the wall to be tra n s fe rre dand lost to the cold. The cera m ics will notload the heat and allow the normaltransfer.
39. S tops mold and mildew deve lop m e ntover its surface. Te sted and field uses over c o n c re te surfaces in car wash on bo t tom section of parking ga ra ge in the Munich Airport.
40 . S ound Pro of i n g : STC te sting conducte dby VTEC labs in NY found a rating of 50at 800 to 1300 Hz. SUPER THERMapplied at the sta n d a rd thickness of 10 mils.a. Ty p ical STC Ratings: 2x4 or 24 ”c e n ters, 3/ 8-5/8 inch wa l l bo a rd, rock wool or fibe rglass batting is 30- 42 .b. National Building Code re q u i res thatp a rt itions separating dwelling unit smeet an STC 50.
41. Ce rti f i ed as Env i ron m e nta l lySafe and He a lthy and Energy Ef f ic i e nt with Ec o- Ef fective Designa. C r a d l e t o C r a d l e D e s i g n Ce rt i f ic ation “ Gold” by MBDC LLC, wh ich is a product and process designfirm dedic ated to re volutionizing the design of products and servic e swo r l dwide that was founded by William M c Do n o u gh and Dr. Michael Brau n ga rtto pro m o te and sha pe the “Nex tI n d u st r ial Re volution" thro u gh thei n t roduction of a new design para d i g mcalled Cradle to Cradle Design and thei m p l e m e n tation of eco-effe c t ive designprinciples.b. Qualifies for LEEDS Points (Plat i n u mRating) under the The Leadership inE n e rgy and Enviro n m e n tal De s i g n(LEED) Green Building Rating Sy stem™ -the nat i o n a l ly accepted be n ch m a rk forthe design, construction, and ope ration of high performance green buildings.
No other insulation type material
has been field tested as extensively
as SUPER THERM.
10 .
11.
APPLY A R-19 EQUIVALENT RATING TO YOUR FACILITY WITH A SINGLE COAT!
With the ability to protect from all 3 methods of heat transfer, SUPER THERM® is proven to outperformtraditional fiberglass insulation. In fact, a layer of SUPER THERM® no thicker than a single business card
provides the same protection as 6 inches of fiberglass. And while a moisture content of 1.5% in fiberglass reducesits effectiveness by 35%, SUPER THERM® is specifically formulated to prevent moisture absorption.
SUPER THERM® is durable and versatile, with a 20-year lifespan under normal conditions. Neither temperaturenor moisture will compromise its performance. SUPER THERM® outperforms and outlasts traditional insulation
in lab tests and on the field.
SUPER THERM® is the most unique and effective insulation and
weatherization material in the market.
WHEN IT COMES TO INSULATING
AND WEATHERIZING, NOTHING RATES
HIGHER THAN SUPER THERM®.
SUPER Therm®
International Test Listings and Approvals
MEETS THE HIGHEST STANDARDS
SUPER THERM® has been rigorously field tested and meets the highest standards. The unique formula is UL, FM, ABS,IMO and Coast Guard approved and a VOC Compliant water-based coating. SUPER THERM® has a Class A Fire Ratingagainst flame and smoke. Plus, it is USDA approved for use in and around food preparation areas.
SUPER THERM® outperforms tra d itional insulation. It counters all three forms of heat ra d iation, convection andc o n d u c t i o n . Traditional insulation only controls conduction. Experience the insulating power of SUPER THERM®.
Tests prove it.
SUPER THERM® is
the better option.
SOLAR REFLECTANCE TEST AFTER 15 YEARS
INTERNATIONAL AREAS OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY
Asia: Japan • China • Taiwan • Korea • Malaysia • Singapore • Indonesia • India
Europe: Italy • Germany • France • Belgium • Netherlands • Turkey • Greece • Spain • Russia • Ukraine
Middle East: Saudi Arabia • UAE • Oman
South America: Venezuela • Colombia • Brazil • Argentina • Chile
Central America: Mexico • Panama • Puerto Rico • Costa Rica
Africa: Egypt • Nigeria • Tanzania • South Africa • Angola
Australia • New Zealand • Mexico • Canada • U.S.A.
THICKNESS OF TRADITIONAL FIBERGLASS INSULATION
THICKNESS OF SUPER THERM®
I M O
Superior Products
International II, Inc®.
www.spicoatings.com
(EQUAL TO)
In Japan, university testing was performed on twenty one reflective coating in the market. Their average beginning reflectivi-ty was 80%. After 591 days (1.5 years), reflectivity was reduced to 58%. This is an accurate view of most all reflective coatingsin the world market.
SUPER THERM®’s solar reflectivity at the new stage was 92.2%, so the reduction in 15 years was less than 20%. (92.2-73=19.2)This result proves that SUPER THERM®’s durability in reflectivity is by far excellent.
SUPER THERM®’s solar reflectance after 15 years was 73%. The reduction of solar reflectance in 3 years tested for the EnergyStar Program by the EPA was only 0.01%.
The test piece was taken froma roof in January 2006 whereSUPER THERM® was applied in1989, and tested at BuildingMaterial Test Center in Japan.
The climate is very severe in thisarea with 38° C (100° F) in thesummer, sand storms, verystrong sun radiation, and -21° C(-5° F) in the winter with snowand ice.
The reflectance of near infraredis 67.1%, but this is becausethe SUPER THERM® at thattime did not contain the fourthceramic, which was introducedin 2000 and designed to blockinfrared rays. Therefore, theresult with the current SUPERTHERM® will be better.
The right coating for ultimate protection.™
• Blocks 95% of Heat Load (blocks the absorption and transfer of heat)
— 99% of Ultra Violet Radiation (UV) — 92% of Visual Light (Short Wave Radiation) — 99.5% of Infra Red (Long Wave Radiation)
• Blocks Water and Moisture Penetration—certifiedand tested water barrier
• Blocks Mold, Mildew, Wood Rot
• Blocks Air Infiltration—permanently flexible windbreaker and wind barrier
• Blocks 68% of All Sound Waves—sound deadening
• Blocks Flame Spread and Smoke—Class “A” FireRating ("0" Flame Spread and Smoke)
• Interior insulation by emissivity (0.91), moistureblock and air block to hold convective heat inside a roomSu pe r ior Prod u cts
I n t e r n at ional II, Inc.®
APPLY A R-19 EQUIVALENT RATING TO YOUR FACILITY WITH A SINGLE COAT!
With the ability to protect from all 3 methods of heat transfer, SUPER THERM® is proven to outperformtraditional fiberglass insulation. In fact, a layer of SUPER THERM® no thicker than a single business card
provides the same protection as 6 inches of fiberglass. And while a moisture content of 1.5% in fiberglass reducesits effectiveness by 35%, SUPER THERM® is specifically formulated to prevent moisture absorption.
SUPER THERM® is durable and versatile, with a 20-year lifespan under normal conditions. Neither temperaturenor moisture will compromise its performance. SUPER THERM® outperforms and outlasts traditional insulation
in lab tests and on the field.
SUPER THERM® is the most unique and effective insulation and
weatherization material in the market.
WHEN IT COMES TO INSULATING
AND WEATHERIZING, NOTHING RATES
HIGHER THAN SUPER THERM®.
SUPER Therm®
International Test Listings and Approvals
MEETS THE HIGHEST STANDARDS
SUPER THERM® has been rigorously field tested and meets the highest standards. The unique formula is UL, FM, ABS,IMO and Coast Guard approved and a VOC Compliant water-based coating. SUPER THERM® has a Class A Fire Ratingagainst flame and smoke. Plus, it is USDA approved for use in and around food preparation areas.
SUPER THERM® outperforms tra d itional insulation. It counters all three forms of heat ra d iation, convection andc o n d u c t i o n . Traditional insulation only controls conduction. Experience the insulating power of SUPER THERM®.
Tests prove it.
SUPER THERM® is
the better option.
SOLAR REFLECTANCE TEST AFTER 15 YEARS
INTERNATIONAL AREAS OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY
Asia: Japan • China • Taiwan • Korea • Malaysia • Singapore • Indonesia • India
Europe: Italy • Germany • France • Belgium • Netherlands • Turkey • Greece • Spain • Russia • Ukraine
Middle East: Saudi Arabia • UAE • Oman
South America: Venezuela • Colombia • Brazil • Argentina • Chile
Central America: Mexico • Panama • Puerto Rico • Costa Rica
Africa: Egypt • Nigeria • Tanzania • South Africa • Angola
Australia • New Zealand • Mexico • Canada • U.S.A.
THICKNESS OF TRADITIONAL FIBERGLASS INSULATION
THICKNESS OF SUPER THERM®
I M O
Superior Products
International II, Inc®.
www.spicoatings.com
(EQUAL TO)
In Japan, university testing was performed on twenty one reflective coating in the market. Their average beginning reflectivi-ty was 80%. After 591 days (1.5 years), reflectivity was reduced to 58%. This is an accurate view of most all reflective coatingsin the world market.
SUPER THERM®’s solar reflectivity at the new stage was 92.2%, so the reduction in 15 years was less than 20%. (92.2-73=19.2)This result proves that SUPER THERM®’s durability in reflectivity is by far excellent.
SUPER THERM®’s solar reflectance after 15 years was 73%. The reduction of solar reflectance in 3 years tested for the EnergyStar Program by the EPA was only 0.01%.
The test piece was taken froma roof in January 2006 whereSUPER THERM® was applied in1989, and tested at BuildingMaterial Test Center in Japan.
The climate is very severe in thisarea with 38° C (100° F) in thesummer, sand storms, verystrong sun radiation, and -21° C(-5° F) in the winter with snowand ice.
The reflectance of near infraredis 67.1%, but this is becausethe SUPER THERM® at thattime did not contain the fourthceramic, which was introducedin 2000 and designed to blockinfrared rays. Therefore, theresult with the current SUPERTHERM® will be better.
The right coating for ultimate protection.™
• Blocks 95% of Heat Load (blocks the absorption and transfer of heat)
— 99% of Ultra Violet Radiation (UV) — 92% of Visual Light (Short Wave Radiation) — 99.5% of Infra Red (Long Wave Radiation)
• Blocks Water and Moisture Penetration—certifiedand tested water barrier
• Blocks Mold, Mildew, Wood Rot
• Blocks Air Infiltration—permanently flexible windbreaker and wind barrier
• Blocks 68% of All Sound Waves—sound deadening
• Blocks Flame Spread and Smoke—Class “A” FireRating ("0" Flame Spread and Smoke)
• Interior insulation by emissivity (0.91), moistureblock and air block to hold convective heat inside a roomSu pe r ior Prod u cts
I n t e r n at ional II, Inc.®
Related Documents
