Summary of 2006 MAP Results for the Joplin R-VIII School District Dr. Jim Simpson, Superintendent Press Conference September 1, 2006 Joplin High School.

Summary of 2006 MAP Results for the

Joplin R-VIII School District

Dr. Jim Simpson, Superintendent

Press Conference

September 1, 2006

Joplin High School

2

Our Theme for 2005-06

3

As a Result of MAP Performance Last Year

• Joplin Schools were Accredited with Distinction for the second year in a row.– The highest level of

accreditation awarded by DESE

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

4

Our Goal for 2006-07 Is. . .

5

Overview of MAP Results• Missouri made significant changes in the 2006 Missouri Assessment Program

(MAP) to meet the standards of the National Assessment of Educational Process.

• Missouri gives the MAP in two content areas at specific grades.– Math--grade 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 10– Communication Arts--grade 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 11

• Student Results are reported in one of four levels– Level 1--Below Basic– Level 2--Basic– Level 3--Proficiency– Level 4--Advanced

• State and District goal is to move students out of Levels 1 & 2 and to move students into Levels 3 & 4.

6

Joplin High School MAP 2006

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

10th Math 11th Grade Com Arts

Grade

Percent in Levels 3 & 4

DistrictState

7

ACT Score Comparison

20

20.5

21

21.5

22

22.5

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Score

JHSStateNational

8

Elementary MAPMathematics 2006

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

3rd 4th 5th

Grade

Percent in Levels 3 & 4

DistrictState

9

Elementary MAPCommunication Arts 2006

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

3rd 4th 5th

Grade

Percent in Levels 3 & 4

DistrictState

10

Middle School MAPMathematics 2006

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

6th 7th 8th

Grade

Percent in Levels 3 & 4

DistrictState

11

Middle School MAPCommunication Arts 2006

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

6th 7th 8th

Grade

Percent in Levels 3 & 4

DistrictState

12

Top Performing SchoolsMathematics

• 30% of Students Scoring in Advanced Level 4– Eastmorland--3rd

• 20% of Students Scoring in Advanced Level 4– Duenweg-- 5th

• 0% of Students Scoring in Below Basic Level 1– Duenweg--3rd, 5th– Duquesne--3rd, 5th– Irving--5th– Kelsey Norman--3rd, 5th– Royal Heights--4th– West Central--5th

13

Top Performing SchoolsCommunication Arts

• 40% of Students Scoring in Advanced Level 4– Duquesne--3rd

• 20% of Students Scoring in Advanced Level 4– Cecil Floyd--3rd, 5th– Columbia--5th– Duquesne--5th– Eastmorland--3rd, 4th– Kelsey Norman--3rd, 5th– Royal Heights--4th, 5th– Stapleton--3rd, 4th, 5th

• 0% of Students Scoring in Below Basic Level 1– Duenweg--3rd, 4th, 5th

– Duquesne--3rd, 4th

– Kelsey Norman--3rd, 5th

14

Schools Exceeding State Average By 10 Percentage Points

• Mathematics– Cecil Floyd--4th

– Duquesne--4th

– Jefferson--3rd

– Kelsey Norman--4th, 5th

– Stapleton--3rd, 4th

• Communication Arts– Cecil Floyd--4th

– Columbia--5th

– Duenweg--3rd

– Kelsey Norman--3rd

– Stapleton--3rd, 5th

– Royal Heights--5th

– South Middle School--7th

15

Schools Exceeding StateAverage By 20 Percentage Points

• Mathematics– Duenweg--4th– Duquesne--3rd, 5th– Eastmorland--3rd– Irving--4th, 5th– Columbia--5th– Royal Heights--5th

• Communication Arts– Duenweg--4th– Duquesne--3rd– Eastmorland--3rd– Irving--4th– Kelsey Norman--4th– Stapleton--4th– Royal Heights--5th

16

Schools Exceeding State AverageBy 30 Percentage Points or More• Royal Heights--4th Grade Math -- 30.1

percentage points above state average

• Duenweg--5th Grade Math-- 41.7 percentage points above state average

17

No Child Left Behind Requirements

• In 2005-06 all elementary schools meet the AYP requirement.

• No school within the Joplin School District requires intervention for 2005-06 under the AYP guidelines.

• In 2006-07 all elementary schools meet the AYP requirement.

• No school within the Joplin School District requires intervention for 2006-07 under the AYP guidelines.

18

EAGLES SOAR HIGH ! ! !