SUGAR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF JAMAICA PRESENTATION TO THE WINT COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY JUNE/JULY 2010 The Sugar Industry in Jamaica 1
SUGAR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF JAMAICA
PRESENTATION TO THE WINT COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY
JUNE/JULY 2010
The Sugar Industry in Jamaica
1
The Jamaican Sugar Industry today
Continuing decline (25%) in production in the past decadePrices no longer EU-subsidisedGovernment unable to continue subsidising the State held
Estates and Farms Must divest holdings as agreed with EU to access budget support
funding through EU accompanying measures grantsOnly 6 sugar factories now operating; cane growing now
includes about 5,000 independent farmers delivering 505,910 tons in 2009 (around 38% of the total grown)
Sugar industry still the second largest employer with 38,000 direct employees* and 228,000 dependents
Industry’s bureaucracy structured for the realities of the past and requiring review to meet a private sector led future.
2
* 2005 Jamaica Country Strategy
The Stakeholders of the Sugar Industry
ManufacturersCane growersEmployees, and their dependentsUnionsContractorsConsumers
Overseas buyers Local buyers
Manufacturers (i.e., local industrial users) Individual consumers
Government
3
The importance of the Sugar Industry
Direct EmploymentIndirect EmploymentEconomic stability of much of rural JamaicaForeign Exchange earnings and/or
substitutionGovernment revenues/(costs)
Taxation/Duties
4
The requirements of the Sugar Industry
Government facilitation “Sensitive industry” status Importation of sugar – raw and refined Adequate national infrastructure Making land available for growing of more cane to optimize factory
capacity Equality of treatment of all industry players, both manufacturers and
growers. Other measures
Profitability / Cost Containment Price Stability Sustainability Efficiency Review of Accompanying Measures Review of taxation and duty regimes affecting Sugar Industry
5
Sugar production
Both cane growing and sugar manufacturing involve very high fixed costs.
The sugar industry in Jamaica needs to maximise efficiencies especially in view of its relatively small size; this involves modernization and capital expenditure to stimulate increased productivity.
The industry has no output GCT tax against which to offset GCT input tax; it therefore seeks relief from this and other duties on imported equipment for cane farming and milling, as well as other necessary inputs, reversing taxes imposed in 2004.
Relief from taxes and duties on fuel oil and lubricants consistent with relief given to other industries (bauxite, tourism)
6
Sugar Industry administration
Sugar produced owned by the factory.Current system of cane farmer registration to individual
factories should continue.The Regulations dealing with cane analysis should be
revised to take account of new technology.Current arrangements for pooling of sugar should
continue, provided that all 96° raw sugar, locally produced molasses and all imported sugar are marketed through the Marketing Committee.
Provision in Sugar Industry Control Act for payment of surpluses from sale of raw sugar into Consolidated Fund should be deleted in view of industry privatization.
7
The responsibilities of the industry’s associations
There are three essential functions that must be managed for the health and wealth of the industry overall:RegulationRegulationMarketingMarketingResearch and DevelopmentResearch and Development
The private sector manufacturers and growers are aware of their responsibilities.
8
The current structure of the Sugar IndustrySIA 24 staff
$126M cost
SIRI 70 staff$204M cost
CPC 0 staff0.5M cost
JCPS 13 staff$60M cost
SMCJ/ 6 staffSPF 23M cost
TOTALTOTAL 113 staff113 staff$414M $414M
costcost
9
Regulatory and Administrative overheads
SMCJ believes that the dual imperatives of greater efficiencies and reduced costs must be applied to the industry’s administration and regulation.
Indirect overheads should be reduced to approximately one third the present expenditure.
Direct overheads are not susceptible to such reductions but the possibility of any and all cost savings should to be addressed.
10
The Sugar Industry’s overheads
US$M/% of Gross Revenue
1991 2000 2009
Direct costs(JCPS)
7,8768.0%
18,98115.7%
42,39635.8%
Indirect costs(JCPS/SIA/SIRI/Core)
1,6001.7%
6,0405.0%
4,4208.0%
11
The Sugar Industry’s overheads (amended)
US$k/% of Gross Revenue
1991 2000 2009
Direct costs(JCPS)
7,8768.0%
18,98115.7%
15,08212.62%
Indirect costs(JCPS/SIA/SIRI/Core)
1,6001.7%
6,0405.0%
4,4208.0%
11
In the original.
•US$M should be US$k.
• Direct costs incorrectly included the cost of imported sugar amounting to US$k 27,314
Regulation
Where appropriate, there should be self regulation at the individual enterprise and association level.
However, the overall and formal regulation (establishment and preservation of equity) of the total industry should remain with government.
The regulatory body should include representatives of the industry’s producers; its functions should be legislative and judicial in nature; it should have NO executive function.
At this time, sugar manufacturers agree the already established Cane Price Formula should continue.
12
Cane Grower v. Miller incentive
Increase in GROWER revenue from 10% increase in sucrose content
Increase in MILLER revenue from 10% increase in sucrose content
Australia 15% 29%
Brazil 15% 20%
India 0% 46%
Mexico 10% 24%
U.S. (Florida) 10% 20%
Jamaica 16% 16%
13
Sugar Industry Authority
The Minister will appoint the Board of the Authority, in accordance with the Act, comprising seven members who by training or experience appear to him to be suitable for appointment, with ability in law, finance, economics and matters related to the sugar industry, as follows: Chairman (Independent) 2 SMCJ Manufacturer Representatives 1 Jamaica Estate Cane Growers’ Association
Representative 1 AIJCFA Representative 2 of Lawyer, accountant, economist
14
Marketing
The SIA should appoint a Sugar Marketing Committee with balanced representation from the Growers and Manufacturers, as well as Independents, as follows: Chairman (Independent) 2 SMCJ Manufacturer Representatives 1 Jamaica Estate Cane Growers’ Association
Representative 1 AIJCFA Representative 2 Independents
This committee should be responsible for the marketing, sale and distribution of the product to the buyers.
Costs of the Committee should be taken from sugar sale proceeds.
15
Local Marketing
Appropriate taxation and imported sugar duty regimes should be put in place to enable local market requirements to be satisfied and administered by the Jamaican sugar industry.
The Sugar Marketing Committee (as agent of the SIA) should be the sole importer of raw and refined sugar into Jamaica.
It should market ONLY sugar, not other commodities such as fertilizer or chemicals.
It should not make loansRevise existing White Sugar Import Regime to
encourage and accommodate locally produced white and brown sugar.
16
Cane Prices Committee
The SIA should appoint a Cane Prices Committee, funded by way of SIA cess and with Terms of Reference as set out in the Mills Commission, with balanced representation from the Growers and Manufacturers, as well as Independents (1 each) and a Chairperson, as follows: Chairman (Independent) 1 SMCJ Manufacturer Representatives 1 AIJCFA Representative 1 Independent
17
Research and Development Committee
The SIA should appoint an R&D Committee with balanced representation from the Growers and Manufacturers, as well as Independents (two each) and a Chairperson, as follows: Chairman (Independent) 2 SMCJ Manufacturer Representatives 1 Jamaica Estate Cane Growers’ Association Representative 1 AIJCFA Representative 2 Independents
Research costs should be shared between the producers, i.e. the growers of cane and the manufacturers of sugar and levied by way of SIA cess.
18
Research & Development Committee
Factory Division Continue
Core sampling
Discontinue All other services
Agricultural Division Continue
Variety development Plant pathology and
entomology Lab analysis for sugar
and molasses Leaf and soil sampling
Discontinue Extension services Economics Engineering All other services
19
The proposed structure of the Sugar IndustrySIA 4 staff
$40M cost
Marketing 6 staff Committee $20M cost
Cane Prices 0 staffCommittee $0.5M cost
R&D 15 staffCommittee $108M cost
SMCJ/SPF 6 staff
$20M cost
TOTALTOTAL 31 staff31 staff$188M cost$188M cost
20
Executive operations
Regulatory authority