31M12SW2004 2 .18296 LUNDY SUMMARY REPORT ON THE FEBRUARY - APRIL 1996 DIAMOND DRILL INVESTIGATION OF KIMBERLITE PIPE 95-1 MONTREAL RIVER "A" PROPERTY LUNDY TOWNSHIP LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION NORTHEASTERN ONTARIO ************************** PREPARED FOR SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD. BY W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD. 365 Bay Street, Suite 807 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2V1 010 NTS 31-M/12 SW MARCH 16,1998 PN: 216-9 File:216951dd.wpd RAYMOND J. KNOWLES, B.Sc.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
31M12SW2004 2 .18296 LUNDY
SUMMARY REPORT
ON THE
FEBRUARY - APRIL 1996
DIAMOND DRILL INVESTIGATION
OF
KIMBERLITE PIPE 95-1
MONTREAL RIVER "A" PROPERTY
LUNDY TOWNSHIP
LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION
NORTHEASTERN ONTARIO
**************************
PREPARED FOR
SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.
BY
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.365 Bay Street, Suite 807
Toronto, OntarioM5H 2V1
010
NTS 31-M/12 SW
MARCH 16,1998
PN: 216-9 File:216951dd.wpd
RAYMOND J. KNOWLES, B.Sc.
31M12SW2004 2.18296 LUNDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
010C
SUMMARY
LOCATION MAPS (1)(2)
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS
APPENDIX A: PLAN MAP A SECTIONS
(1) DRILL HOLE PLAN MAP
(2) SECTION RC #1 AND DDK #2
(3) SECTION DDK #3
(4) SECTION DDK #1
APPENDIX B:
APPENDIX C:
1:20,000 1:5,000
1:2,500
1:1,000
1:1,000
1:1,000
DDK LOGS; MS LOG: HOLES l - 3
LAKEFDELD RESEARCH ANALYSIS REPORT
W. A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
SUMMARY
Kimberlite Pipe 95-1 was discovered on Claim 1202721 in one of three holes drilled into a magnetic low target by a Reverse Circulation Drill in March of 1995. No macro or micro diamonds were recovered from 80.0 kg of material. Indicator results totaled 25 chromite, 38 picroilmenite, 2 clinopyroxene and 17 pyrope garnet grains. Based on these results, three angled holes were diamond drilled (NQ) into the pipe to delineate the dimensions and describe the geology of the pipe, and to gain a bulk sample for diamond and indicator analysis.
Diamond drilling was conducted between February 24 and March 6, 1996. Logging and sampling were conducted March 25 to April 5, 1996 on Holes MRB-96-1, 2 and 3.
Analysis of the DD core (sent April 5, 1996) was performed by Lakefield Research Limited, Lakefield, Ontario. A total of 313.6 kg on 7 samples representing a split half portion of kimberlite core was sent for caustic dissolution. No diamonds were recovered. A total of 64 kg in four samples representing 25 cm of every 1m of split half portion of kimberlite core was sent for attrition milling in order to recover indicator minerals. An extensive suite was selected.
Diamond drilling intersected kimberlite in all three holes even where vertical RC holes above the drill hole trace failed to intersect kimberlite. The drilling results to date indicate an initial heterolithic volcanoclastic kimberlitic diatreme breccia, subsequently cut by at least two if not three hypabyssal dikes comprising up to 30"^ of the kimberlite body. Indicator minerals recovered include 62 pyrope, 147 possibly eclogitic almandine-pyrope, 67 chrome diopside and 14 picrochromite/ picroilmenite. No probe work was conducted at this time.
Further testing of Pipe 95-1 will be assessed after all kimberlite targets have been drilled.
The coordination and implementation of the various technical tasks was conducted by W.A. Hubacheck Consultants Ltd, under the supervision of D. Christie and R. Knowles.
95-1 PIPE DRILL HOLE PLAN MAP SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.
Scale: 1:5000
-J, Dwg. By: RJK Date: 03/16/98
O
Certificate of Qualifications
I, Raymond J. Knowles, of the City of Etobicoke, in the Province of Ontario, Canada, do hereby certify that:
1) I am an Exploration Geologist, residing at 79 Thirteenth Street, Etobicoke, Ontario, M8V 3H5, under contract to W. A. Hubacheck Consultants Ltd., 365 Bay St., Suite 807, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2V1.
2) I am a graduate of the University of Toronto where I received my Bachelor of Science degree in Geology in 1985, and have been practising my profession as an Exploration Geologist continuously since graduation.
3) I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada, a member of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada.
4) This report is based on personal examination of the property in 1995 and 1996.
5) I have no direct interest hi the properties or securities of Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd..
Dated at Toronto, OntarioMarch 16, 1998 Raymond J. Knowles, B.Se.
W. A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
APPENDIX A:
PLAN MAP A SECTIONS
\V. A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
4^ /frifr"
r-~/ t ' '' s t\l 'it /V/ X Ph f rf /.^ U kc. .-" J } L//^.
(00 A/
—2005
N
LEGEND
3c Huronian Conglomerate ?.?~- out crop outline
glacial striation directionOut line of total field ground magnetic anomalystrike, dipalder
95-1 PIPE DRILL HOLE PLAN MAP SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.
Huronian Firstbrook Formation Breccia. Siltstone as previously described butmoderately to severely brecciated. Bedding demonstrated that me fragments are
orientated to core axis. No millir^has occured. Fragments are angular and range
from ^mm up to 350mm but average < 100mm.88.0-94.0 Breccia is clast supported more or less tight with limonite healing joins
and 5* void space. M.S. is 0.15 to 0.2. A yellow colouration exists throughout
Monolithic Oxidized Kimberlite Breccia. Breccia fragments ^5mm) are separated
by matrix comprised of siltstone fragments ^mm and minor calcite phis possiblekimberlite (fine grained now serpentine?). Rock is not very competent and has
up badly along matrix, however, matrix is estimated to be about 10-20* of rockthrough this section. M.S. values are variable with matrix rarely achieving ^4.
The siltstone breccia fragments however increase in magnetic susceptabuity from 0.3
through lo 2.7 by 98.5 and finally after 98.5 lo 101. The M.S. values range from
Monolithic Kimberlite Breccia. 70 X siltstone as described before as randomlyoriented blocks 100 to 550mm in length separated by 15 X randomly oriented siltstone
fragments ^mm to 30mm in size which inturn is separated by 5* white calcite, and
10* fine grained kimberlite of a medium grey green colouration except 105.2-106where the kimberlite becomes more cyrstaline with calcite intermixed and takes onan indian red colouration. Possible later hypabyssal/diatreme phase. Where matrix
obtains a thickness of <20mm ie. at 105.55 the kimberlite is a medium grey with
about 20* fine olivine crystals. At 106.0 ^-4mm calcite clear crystals. Overall
matrix supported with clast either separated by kimberlite or fracture thin calcite.
M.S. leadings of the matrix rich areas average 1.4 whereas the 5* 100mm siltstone
blocks range from 2.1 to 6.9. The siltstone blocks with more abundant brownlaminae have higher M.S. values possibly indicating a magnhration of the iron
rich bands??
Lower contact sharp at 20* to CA.Upper contact oxidization boundary by groundwater is sharp, over 20mm.
diatreme ohase of a t rev hue cross-cut bv later ereen hypabyssal dvkes (5*) andpossibly subsequently by rusty speckled diatreme dykes (5%). The massive diatreme
is matrix supported with up to 30 X clasts of country rock.
Clasts - overall 2056 limestone and 1056 Huronian siltstone. The limestone is angularto sub-angular, ^-240mm but average 30-40mm. The siltstone is both grey, dark
green and brown, b angular to sub-angular and ranges in size from O-60mm.Possible trace eccurance of gneiss. Also possible trace mantle fragments, however.
these are always badly weathered, serpentinized, so their true nature can not be
determined. Possible trace autolith*?
Matrix - generally fine grained, grey kimberlite at >40*> white speckled calciteafter olivine at 10-20* and ^mm country rock fragments at 10-20X.
No indicator minerals can be seen in either the main diatreme facies or Ibe subsequent
hypabyssal and diatreme dykes. There are no pelletab present throughout.Matrix is generally very reactive to acid in main diatreme as well as the dykes.
Dykes: Green hypabyssal - generally olive green hue, medium to fine grainedgranular, 5 % < 1mm size white specks of calcite. Has the texture of a medium tofine grained sandstone. Granuals could possibly be pelletab or olivine pseudo-
morphed to serpentine and the kimberlite matrix b also altered to serpentine and
calcite.Rust bdian Red Diatreme - generally ID-15% clasts of limestone and siltstone.
sub-angular <2mm up to 30mm set hi a medium (rained granular oxidized matrixcomprised of up to 2D% calcite pseudomorph! of olivine -CI .3mm matrix supported.
but up to 5 X fine pUogophHe (mica). Trace autolims can be seen. Some patchesof less to unaltered can be seen infrequently as grey and/or medium green.
M.S. - generally die main diatreme facies. Ranges 14.0-30 but averages 20.
The green hyabyssal dykes range from .06-1.07 and average 0.7.The red diatreme dykes range 0.7-3.9 and average 2.0 in the olivine rich (nowcalcite) sections and 4.8 in the more kimberlite rich. In both cases dwre is a halo
effect on both sides of die dykes anywhere from 10cm to 1m where rock is clayaltered and M.S. values are depressed.The larger limestone blocks have readings as high as 1.7 but average 0-0.2.Generally all diatreme kimberlite shows a strong magnetic attraction.
of 20* to CA and a lower contact of 32* to CA.
106.25-108.15 M.S. values 1.2-11.0, possibly due lo clay alteration, core a very
soft with up to 20% calcite crysfaline filled vuggy patches and zones and up to XX
clasts inhiiltv and men nadint bv 107.5 down to 20-30*.108.15-109.0 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact at 30* to CA, lower contactis (round. Very crumbky soft weathered serpentine and fine calcite.
109.0-109.6 Main diatreme facies.
109.6-110.25 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact at 20* to CA, tower contact
at 18* to CA. Early fine wormy fractures healed with olive green (serpentine)
(5-10*) later fractures and wormy patches oxidized ^H, 2-5mm rusty altered
contact rind at bom contacts.110.95 10mm green dyke at 45* to CA, and oxidized discolouration crosscutting at
20* to CA.
1 1 1 .05-1 1 1 .8 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact at 30* to CA, lower contact
at 32* to CA.
111.3-111.35 Oxidized section sharp contacts at 40* to CA.
117.25-118.75 Broken up section with M.S. readings around 10, possibly due toclay alteration.
120.3-121.0 Same as above.121.4-121.6 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact irregular but near 90* to CA.
DESCRIPTIONGEOLOGY: (colour, t nin tize, texture, minenu. iteration, etc)
166.7-166.8 Lineation of fine ^mm rankles at 45* to CA.167.75 5-20mm wide green hypabyssal dyke at 25* to CA.
168.55 Alignment contact at 50* to CA where M.S. values drop from 15 to 1.6.
168.55-168.9 Paler or bleach section (clay alteration?)
168.9-169.9 Breeciazone. SO-60% clasts of 90?4 brown laminated siltstone.
Clasts are rounded to sub-rounded demonstrating milling and are > 15 to 40mm in
size. Matrix is for the most part a fine grained green (serpentinized) with fine
calcite bhs unlike the main diatreme body. This probably is representative of the laterhypabyssal dyke which has come up along the contact of the main diatreme with
the siltstone and further brecciated and transported siltstone blocks and fragments.
Or, s simply more quickly chilled kimberlite. There are similarities with thekimberlite matrix of the upper contact breccia.
169.7-169.8 Rusty red calcite spotted dyke with upper ft lower contacts at 50* lo CA.
169.9 Lower contact at 60* to CA.
laminated grey siltstone. In this case, however, there fa DO extensive brecciation
(169.9-170.6) and fine grained wacke sets are very thin to non-existant and brown
DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY: (colour, f nun size, texture, minerals, alteration, etc)
Overburden.
Huronian Firstbrook Formation Siltstone. Red brown l-2mm laminae, 3-80mm fine
greywacke and 2-4mm grey buff siltstone all alternating (rythymites?).Bedding at 64 lo 74* lo CA, average 70* to CA for the most part, massive
competent M.S. average 0.2.34.75-36.5 Soft sediment deformation. Sharp .upper contact at 70* lo CA.
First 0.5m is quite disturbed. Remainder a well bedded but anywhere from 0-40*
W CA.37.45-38.05 Red stained alteration. Gradational upper and tower boundaries
over 5-10cm. A red brown hue discolours the siltstone. Fractures are filled withcalcite at 50* and at 20* to CA.37.8 100mm wide fault gouge or kimberlite buff grey carbonate rich.
38.5-42.0 Increased fracturing filled with limonitic calcite.42.0-42.6 Breccia zone with partings up lo 30mm. Matrix is up to 30* and
comprised of fine grained buff brownish to buff yellow stained calcite.at 42.05-42.08 and 42.25-42.3 probable kimberlite component Siltstone is stained
dark brown red as in the earlier discribed alteration zone.42.9-43.8 5* calcite filled fractures.44.9-45.5 Heterolithic volcaniclastic diatreme breccia dyke. Upper contact at44* to CA, lower contact at 50 to CA.
30-40* clasts, matrix supported. Matrix medium to light grey with 20* ^mmcountry rock chips and 40* fine grained massive kimberlite (clay altered?).
Clasts are primartty limestone and siltstone at equal proportions ranging in size from
O-50mm. Siltstone is half grey half brown laminae. Kimberlite is filling anopened irregular fracture with minor calcite filled fracture extending outwards at
30* to CA for 5cm beyond contacts into the wall rock. No indicators observed.
M.S. ranges 3-5.4, averaging 4.4.45 .5-45.8 Rapid decrease in brown lamininae bedding still at 70* to CA.
Brecciated Huronian Ftrstfarook Formation Grey Siltstone. ̂ —^———^—-Massive finely laminated grey siltstone, 70-80* brecciated of which 60* is severely
brecciated and 5-10* kimberlite diatreme dykes.Bedding lamenae is for the most pan oriented or intact through me brecciation
at 60-64* to C A except in the major brecccia sections where random attitudes to
CA indicate maior movement of breccia fragments.M.S. ranges 0.02-0.2.
45.8-47.1 Minor brecciation. Mostly fracture separation and infilling with whitecalcite ^2-3 mm).
47.1-47.4 Strong brecciation with ID-15% infilling of white and grey calcite, minor
Kimberlite.47 .4-47 .55 Moderate to minor brecciation.47.55-47.6 Cilcite/ktmberlhe dyke white to buff grey like die kimberlite matrix
to the previously described diatreme dyke.
47.6-48.60 Moderate to strong brecciation with up to 20* white calcite and 10*buff grey kimberlite.48.6-49.1 Minor brecciation, calcite filled fracture partings.49.1-54.9 Moderate to severe brecciation whh possible kimberlite monolithic
volcaniclastic breccia dyking from 49.9-54.9. Note no significant M.S. change
0.1-0.17.49.1-49.5 20* matrix and void space where matrix is 5* white calcite and 15X
buff grey kimberlite?49.9-54.9 Possible monolithic volcaniclastic kimberlite breccia dyke with up to 50X
calcite rich kimberlite matrix fine grained buff crev with a oale treen mottled timeand an overall yellowing. Clasts Omm-200mm 10X of which are red brownsiltstone and 40*4 are grey siltstone. Clasts are randomly oriented with respectto CA. No limestone or indicators were observed. Late calcite infilling voids and
partially coating clasts and late fractures.53.0-53.8J Low angle 10-20* to CA. late brecciation and infilling with 20-30*
yellowed calcite (limonhic) no kimberlite.
54.9-56.23 More or less massive grey siltstone with oriented lamination at 55*
to CA. Trace fracturing zones. M.S. values range 0.04-0.13.56.23-56.9 Heterolithic volcaniclastic kimberlite breccia dyke. Medium to dark
grey purple matrix (60S), fine to medium grained with 20X <2mm country rock.Clasts at 30-40*4 are ^-30mm grey to brown siltstone and fine limestone.First 10cm and last 10cm appear to be monolithic and clasH are rounded in a
hypabyssal type kimberlite matrix, possibly indicating a 2 phase dyking. Abo a30-40mm band at 56.6 is possibly indicative of a third and last dyking of hypabyssalmaterial with no clasn like the narrow dyke seen at 59.940.0, and 59.65-59.7.Overran M.S. average 2.2.56.9-63.0 More or less massive grey finely laminated siltstone with lamenae at
Medium to dark grey matrix supported.Clasts: 4*50* angular to sub-angular. 20* limestone, ^-ItQaua. Many smallerare clay altered. 30* siltstone (15 red brown, 5 grey). ^-350mm. Trace lutolhfas.
Some limestone clasts have a thin kimberlite rim or rind.
70.0-70.13 Lane buff ereen crev autolith.Matrix - fine grained granular, calcite rich, with 10-15* ^mm country rockfragments. Medhim buff grey colouration consistant throughout Minor to moderate
clay alteration seen also with depressed M.S. readings.
Indicators were not observed. Non-pelletals.
Unit appears to be a single phase with no observed internal structure.M.S. value average 16.5 (with a range of 13-18.5) with clay alteration sections
ranging from 8.4-11.5, averaging 9 J.81.2-83.3 clay altered section with depressed M.S. and reduced clast content and
size. Possible secondary, phase although contact not obvious.
Tizhtrv Brecciated Huronian Firstbrook Siltstone.Grey, purple to red brown. Laminated at 60-70* to CA.50-60* brecciated. 30* of which is a tight, clast supported, where clam are <2m^^-
30mm bound by a thin (Omm) matrix composed of 60* kimberlite and 40*calcite.
The other 30* breccia is a matrix supported for the most part monolithicvolcaniclastic kimberlite diatreme to hypabyssal breccia. Matrix is commonly
Brecciated Huronian Firstbrook Formation SiltstoneRed brown finely laminated at 73-75* to CA. Tight breccia zone. Matrix at 15-20*fine grained kimberlite clay altered. M.S. 0.85-1.16.
Note: Suspect 95.5-93.2, 96.0-100. 100.8-102.0 and 102.6-103.6 could be of the
same breccia and the clay altered kimberlite matrix has washed out and causedblocking and grinding of core. Pieces of clay kimberlite are seen along the ground
section.
Huronian Firstbrook Formation SiltstoneBeige grey, finely laminated siltstone to medium lo dark grey, finely laminate*!
siltstone. Laminations at 70-75* to CA. Massive.
155.3-155.5 Kimberlite hypabyssal dyke, fine grained massive with l-2cm rim of20* <2mm country rock medium to dark grey black. 3cm wan rock alteration.
red staining. Contact angle at 50* to CA. M.S. 4.5-4.7.
End of Hole.Note: Second surface geophysical magnetic target was not intersected.
SAMPLE
SMiruNO. FROM TO LENGTH %
SUL
ASSAYS
Aln*
: DOWNHOLE SURVEYING
HOLE NUMBER:l
Le premier test commence a du casing acres dix metres: Spcrry-Gun-
Metres i Test Azimuth Dip
\375m lAcid test100m !Sperry-Sun150m IT) i Sperry-Sun175m LAcid test 56200m ;Sperry-Sun250m Zf\ j iSperry-Sun275m i Acid test300m iSperry-Sun350m ! Sperry-Sun375m -Acid test400m ISperry-Sun450m !Sperry-Sun475m jAcid test500m i Sperry-Sun550m Sperry-Sun575m : Acid test600m i Sperry-Sun650m 'Sperry-Sun675m 'Acid test700m l Sperry-Sun750m i Sperry-Sun775m 'Acid test800m ;Sperry-Sun850m Sperry-Sun875rn. 900'm
'Acid test'Sperry-Sun
950m __jSperry-Sun 975m i Acid test1000m 'Sperry-Sun
Massive finely laminated with red brown fine grained laminae (l-2mm), brown grey
fine grained laminae (2-5mm) and grey black medium to fine grained greywacke bedsCA.(2-5mm). Overall bedding 70-76* to CA.M.S. values range 0.2-0.27 average 0.24.
95.95-96.05 Kimberlite dyke hypabyssal medium to light grey banded (flow).Contacts and banding it 60* to CA.
M.S. 7.7-8.8. No acid reaction.97.55 3mm kimberlite dyke as above.Contact at 50* lo CA.
98.0-99.0 2-5** increased fracturing ruled with calcite.99.0-101.3 Monolithic to heterolithic volcaniclastic kimberlite breccia and multiple
narrow hypabyssal dyking.
Much of the 2.3m (60*) is broken up badly, however, the kimberlite component isabout 50* of the total.
M S values for the kimberlite matrix of the diatreme and hvoabvssal ranee from.59 - 10.4. Contact angles are mostly broken but some are 60-76* to CA.Some of the clasts within me diatreme portion are beat altered lo deep red brown andpurple and have M.S. values of .35 up to 4.32.
The kimberlite a very similar to the above hypabyssal dykes. Hypabyssal componenthas no acid reaction as well. There is 5* calcite infilling associated fractures within
the siltstone and surrounding some clasts within the breccia. Calcite is post kimberlite.101.65-101.95 Further brecciation with 10* kimberlite and 3* calcite and a 20mm
dyke at 54* to CA.102.5-103.5 Badly fractured, 1* fine pyrite crystals, 5-10X kimberlite hypabyssal
dyking as above but much has been disohrcd and washed during drilling.M J. 0.18 - .26 average 0.2.
Huronian firstbrook Formation Siltstone
Medium grey green finely laminated and 20X dark grey black greywacke l-5mm
beds.M.S. 0.22 - 0.27. average 0.24.
JO-40% fractured lo badly fractured whh kimberlite dyking which is clay alteredand generally poor recovered and not enough present for an M.S. reading.
Heterolithic Volcaniclastic Kimberlite Diatreme Breccia. Contact at 60* lo CA.
Medium grey fine grained granular matrix with generally A0% but up to 605S clastsof red brown laminated and grey siltstone and limestone. Clast content variation isgradational in nature and probably not indicative of separate diatreme phases.Only minor hypabyssal kimberlite dyking is observed as green fine grained granular
material. Several narrow oxidized red dykes and/or fracture related alteration is
seen occasionally throughout Also narrow medium to dark grey hypabyssalkimberlite dykes are seen in two instances trending at low angle to core axis.
Flow fabrics or orientation of clasts is rarely seen.No indicators minerals were observed, trace possible autolith! and mantle clast maybe present. Some clasts appear to be clay altered after serpentine and could be relic
mantle clasts.Matrix is comprised of 10-15* fine ^2mm) country rock fragments and 5-10* veryfine calcite dots, probably after olivine, all bound in fine grained medium greykimberlite.
Clasts is stated virv in zones from 40-6096 ire dominantlv siltstone 70% ind 3096limestone and angular to sub-angular ranging from <2mm up to 250 mm for
limestone and 200mm for siltstone. Trace clasts mostly limestone <40mm show
presence of a 2mm nm of different coloured matrix and could represent different
matrix coatings and rebrecciation of an cartier phase or rather a preservation halo.The diatreme is clay altered lo varying degrees reflected by easily crumbled core.
packed or pitted core and weathered limestone (mantle) clasts to clay and also
reduced M.S. values.
Features of interest?
111.0-111.25 Reddish tinge medium grained granular. 40-5051 clasts all OOmm,
trace liiiiciiloue.
M.S. 4.3-2.3.
111.25-117.35 Medium grey matrix. 30-4096 clists.
M.S. 14.2-22.7, average 17.5.
115.6 Oxidized calcite healed fracture at 20* to CA with up to 20mm reddish halo.
116.65 Oriented clasts at 35* to CA.117.35-119.85 60-7056 clasts in a reddish brown lo medium grey grainular matrix.
Upper contact broken, lower contact 70* to CA. 0.5* 1 -2mm calcite crystals.
M S values 4 55 - 9 2 fdue to abundance of clasts?)119.85-130.5 40-50* clasts in a medium grey matrix.
M.S. values range from 12 lo 23 but average 17 - 19 in less altered matrix.
120.7 Oxidized reddish with washout green clast (possible mantle).123.5, 123.8 and 124.15 1mm calcite filled fractured with 10-20mm reddish brown
alteration halo. The 124.15 fracture has a 100cm halo with reduced M.S. lo 8.1.
Angles are 50* to CA.124.7 30mm 3.6 M.S. dyke? at 50' and 60* to CA.
125.0-125.1 Large autolith. M.S. 20.9.
127 J Qilche filled fracture with reddish halo it 50' to CA.128.1-128.5 Alignment at 23* lo CA.
129.2 20* calcite fracture. 10mm halo.130.5-131.0 70* clasts, partially oxidized matrix. No preserved contacts.M.S. 11.3, one suspect mantle clast, clay altered pale greenish hue.131.0-146.7 30-40* clasts in a medium grey fine grained matrix.
M.S. average 19.131.25-131.75 Green hypabyssal dyke. Upper contact 18* lo CA. Lower at 42*to CA. Fine grained granular, strong acid reaction fine calcite after otvine?
M.S. 1.5.132.9-133.25 18* 10-20mm hypabyssal dyke, medhun to dark grey, M.S. 20.
133.75-133.8 Granular dark grey dyke? at 56* to CA. M.S. 24.6.134.4-134.6, 134.95-135.05 Coarse lo medium granular diatreme matrix (calcite
after olivine?).
M.S. 19.9 - 30.1. lower contact 0 36* to CA.
139.2 Red brown staining, 30mm.
141.0 40* red brown oxidation? zone (15mm).141.55 50*, 10mm red brown zone with .5mm calcite centre.
141.57, 141.8 2 possible mantle clasts.146.7-152.05 60-70* clasts in a medium grey fine grained kimberlite as before. Norcil slurp contacts just sudden increase in clist content.M.S. average 12-13.
150.15 45mm possible altered mantle clast with oxidized rind.152.05-162.75 30-40* clasts in a fine grained medium grey matrix as before.153.9-154.0 Large possible altered mande or autolith.157.4-158 Low angle 15*. 10-15mm wavey hypabyssal dyke.
162.75 Lower contact sharo M 50* to CA.162.75-162.95 Red diatreme buff brown medium to coarse (rained, 20-30?t clasts.
M.S. 7.3. Lower contact at 40* to CA.
162.95-167.2 40-60* clasts in a fine grained medium grey matrix.
M.S. values average 12. Last 30cm averages 2.4.
huronian FnyfrwK formation SiltstoneRed brown laminated like at the beginning of the hole.M.S. average 0.27.167.2-168.5 Core fractured and ground.170.0-181.0 Massive competent.
No diamonds were recovered from either the caustic dissolution residues or the nonmagnetic fractions of the attrition milling residues. A suite of potential indicator minerals was selected from the attrition mill residues; pyrope garnet, chrome diopside, and orange garnet (possibly eclogitic almandine-pyrope) were identified. Few grains of chromite and ilmenite were selected from the 0.4Amp nonmagnetic fractions; this fraction typically contains the magnesian varieties of the oxide minerals (picrochromite, picroilmenite).
Twenty-five synthetic diamonds were recovered from both the attrition milling and caustic dissolution residues.
The summary data sheets are attached. ;
LAKEFIELD RESEARCH CHILE SA., Los Ebanistas 8585, Parque Industrial La Reina, Santiago, ChileFbno 56-2-273-0487 Facsimil 56-2-273-0250
Hubachedt 8900-9S1 LakefieU Research Mineralogy - Diamonds
Procedures
Attrition Milling
The four samples were crushed to pass a nominal 5mm and were submitted for gentle attrition milling using the polyurethane cement mixers. The mixers were charged with a package of ceramic balls (3/4", l", and l 1/2" diameter in equal proportions). A high solids percentage was maintained to minimize impact of the ceramic charge. The attrition milling was allowed to continue for a period of four to eight hours after which the mill was emptied onto the 20 mesh Kason 24 inch diameter vibratory screens. The milling and screening operation was carried out in short stages to optimize fines removal and to minimize overall milling residence time. Milling durations of fourteen to forty-two hours were required.
The milling typically is continued until the development of a fines fraction was at a minimum (oversize fraction typically 5-10wt34 of original sample weight). The attrition milling residue was screened at 20 and 100 mesh, dried and weighed. The -20+100 mesh fraction was submitted for heavy liquid separation at SG 3.1 using a medium of acetone tuned methylene iodide.
The -20+100 mesh heavy liquid concentrate and the +20 mesh oversize fractions are submitted for microscopy to identify the presence of indicator minerals (pyrope, almandine-pyrope, chrome diopside, picroilmenite, picrochromite, olivine) and to select a representative suite of the indicator minerals. Microscopy is carried out on several magnetic, paramagnetic and nonmagnetic fractions of the HLS concentrate.
Diamonds may be observed in the nonmagnetic portion of the HLS concentrate; however, the diamonds may exhibit evidence of breakage during the milling procedure. In-house tests have indicated a shift in the frequency and size distribution of the contained diamonds as compared to parallel caustic dissolution tests.
Caustic Dissolution
The caustic dissolution treatment, directly uses diamond's property of high resistance to chemical attack. The procedure was developed, and refined to improve and streamline the process for routine diamond exploration samples, in response to the microdiamond losses attributed to standard attrition milling and also to reduce the weight of final concentrate.
The major advantage of the caustic dissolution process is the ability to recover, without breakage, all of the diamonds contained within the sample regardless of their particle size (+100 mesh), liberation size, quality or origin. The latter may account for actual diamond xenocrysts from the Tamberlitic' material, and l or quality control stones added by Lakefield Research or by the client, and l or diamonds attributed to the exploratory core drilling equipment.
Diamond losses and modifications to the size distribution profile due to stone breakage are eliminated. A comparison of the efficiency of the caustic dissolution treatment and attrition milling flowsheets was undertaken using 'seeded1 kimberlite samples. The results clearly indicated breakage and losses of microdiamonds from the milled samples; the normalized stone frequency (SPFK) and octacarat weights (OCPFK) typically were reduced by a factor of two to ten times.
Hubadtedf g900-981 Lakefldd Research Mineralogy - Diamonds
Anomalously high stone frequency data indicating breakage was reported; corresponding stone weights and microdiamond grades were invariably low.
Routine quality control tests are utilized to evaluate the efficiency of the caustic dissolution technique. As such, the samples are blind spiked, prior to the fusion step, with green diamonds typically measuring from 10 to 80 mesh; these stones have been neutron irradiated to produce the distinctive coloration.
Lakefield Research is not responsible for determination of the origin, quality or valuation of any diamonds recovered.
Flowsheet l outlines the typical program for microdiamond recovery from exploration samples. The caustic dissolution followed by water and acid leaching, and magnetic separations will produce several fractions commonly containing relict indicator minerals and a non-magnetic fraction possibly containing microdiamonds.
The Lakefield Research facility has sixteen pottery kilns which can treat up to 8 kg each (using uncrushed drill core) and are mn in a 24 hour cycle. The use of smaller sample charges may be dictated by the abundance of carbonate minerals. Prior to the dissolution stage, a cursory mineralogical examination, by XRD and l or acid leach test (note effervescence), is carried out to identify any potentially deleterious phases. The carbonates, in particular, may exhibit a vigorous reaction to the hot caustic soda. Therefore, 1) the sample charge must be reduced to accommodate the relative volume increase or 2) the sample may be subjected to an acid digestion step. The former is recommended as the latter requires a similar time frame and additional material handling (leaching, filtering, rinsing, drying, weighing, etc.) which could contribute to potential losses of microdiamonds.
At the appropriate sodium hydroxide to sample ratio and optimum temperatures, the reaction is allowed to continue overnight As depicted in the flowsheet, the process consists of dissolving the entire sample in a molten sodium hydroxide bath and typically recovering the H-100 mesh residue.
An important feature of the recovery system is the pouring of the melt through a large diameter, stainless steel screen to collect the residue. The screening procedure significantly reduces the material handling and simplifies the subsequent leaching process. The screen and pot are leached sequentially with water and then acid to dissolve the residual sodium hydroxide. Collection of the final dissolution residue from the leaching tub is also made on a stainless steel screen. Of note, all screens are dedicated to only the diamond programs; each of the screens is examined thoroughly before and after usage. Any flaws require immediate replacement of the screen.
The spent caustic is allowed to cool for 24 hours, is removed from the recovery vessel and drummed for recycling for outside industrial applications.
After drying, the dissolution residue is split into three magnetic and non-magnetic fractions using the permanent magnet followed by the Frantz Isodynamic Separator. Extreme care is required as the non-magnetic, diamondiferous, portion of the residue commonly amounts to no more than a few milligrams. The concentrate products are then submitted for microscopy.
Hubaduck 8900-981 Lakefield Research Mineralogy - Diamonds
Very few minerals survive the harsh attack; therefore weight reductions commonly exceed 999*6 of the initial sample weight The high weight loss with optimum stone recovery is another major advantage of the caustic dissolution technique.
Only highly resistant minerals such as diamond, graphite, moissanite, zircon, chromite, kyanite, etc. survive the caustic attack. Of note, partially dissolved indicator minerals including colorless to opaque spinel, garnet, and ilmenite, as rounded relicts of original coarse grains, may occur in the dissolution residue.
The selected diamonds are measured using the petrographic microscope and the data are transferred to octacarat weights using an in-house software package. Diamonds may be weighed individually or in groups using the Sartorius balance to O.xxx mg. Graphic representation of the diamond size and frequence distribution may be provided upon request.
HubachfckS900-9Sl Lakefidd Research Mineralogy - Diamonds
Resnhs
Attrition Moling
The sample weights for the attrition milling testwork are summarized as follows:* 35060 106-138m 13.1kg* 35061 138-169.9m 15.3kg* 35062 63.4-8S.2m 9.2kg* 35063 lll-167.2m 26.4kg
The attrition milling and heavy liquid product weights are summarized below:* 35060 ' 1 06-138m +20 Mesh 480g
A suite of potential indicator minerals was selected from the attrition mill residues; pyrope garnet, chrome diopside, and orange garnet (possibly eclogitic almandine-pyrope) were identified. Few grains of chromite and ilmenite were selected from the 0.4Amp nonmagnetic fractions; this fraction typically contains the magnesian varieties of the oxide minerals (picrochromite, picroilmenite).
The indicator minerals recovered from the attrition milling residues are tabulated below.
The concentrates contained abundant pyrite, exotic rock fragments (typically metasedimentary lithologies) and ferromagnetic to strongly paramagnetic oxide minerals.
The indicator minerals are in storage and may be mounted for electron microprobe analysis at your convenience.
Hubaduck 8900-981 Lakefteld Research Mineralogy - Diamonds
Synthetic diamonds were recovered from two of the attrition mill concentrates as follows:* 35062 6 synthetic diamonds* 35063 IS synthetic diamonds
Caustic Dissolution
The sample weights for the caustic dissolution testwork are summarized as follows:* 35120* 35121* 35122* 35123* 35124* 35125. and 35126
No natural diamonds were recovered from either the caustic dissolution residues or the nonmagnetic fractions of the attrition milling residues.
Four synthetic diamonds were recovered.
The caustic dissolution data sheets are attached.
The invoice was forwarded under separate cover.
The selected indicator minerals, attrition mill products and caustic dissolution residues will be stored at Lakefield Research. Please advise when shipment is required
If there are any questions regarding the results, please do not hesitate to call me.
Notes: 1 carat s 10 octacarats.Lakefield Research is not responsible for the determination of the origin, quality or valuation of any diamonds recovered.
Page 1 Thursday, June 06,1996
LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.P.O. Bag 4300,185 Concession Street, LakefieU, Ontario, KOL 2HO Phone: 705-652-2000 FAX: 705-652-6365
Silicates (clear, white, brown), with minor oxides.
Total Weight (octacarats):
Number of Diamonds:
CPHT (Total sample Grade):
SPFK(* 100 mesh):
OCPFK(* 100 mesh):
O
O
O
O
O
Number of Syndttes:
Authorizing Signature
s Notes: 1 carat s 10 octacarats.
Lakefield Research is not responsible for the determination of the origin, quality or valuation of any diamonds recovered.
Page 1 Thursday, June 06,1996
SS&****** Declaration of Assessment Work and Mines Performed on Mining Land
Mining Act, Subsection 68(2) ami 66(3), R.S.O. 1000
Transaction Number (office use)
41Imaging
Ity of subsections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Ad. Under aectlon 8 of the l to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Ing Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor,
31M12SW2004 2.18296 LUNDY 900Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240.
- Please type or print in ink.
1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)2. l 8296
Name *SudLbu.*-v)
Client Numbericy O /
Telephone Numbercc -u-4-. Ma..
Name Client Number
Address Telephone Number
Fax Number
2. Type of work performed: Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.
D Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs)
Physical: drilling, stripping, trenching and associated assays Rehabilitation
Work Type
rvA
Office Use
Commodity
Total S Value of Work Claimed
Oates Work PfjrtorffttQ
. From T0 NTS ReferenceGlobal Positioning System Data (If available) TownahiptttsK
Mining DivisionM or Q-Plan umber Resident Geologist
District
Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.
3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Telephone Number
10. A MdLAddress Fax
*Name Telephone Number
Address Fax Number
Name
Addrasa
Telephone Number
Fax Number
4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent
MAR 2^ 1998GEOSCIENCASSESSMENT
OK ^^ , do hereby certify that l have personal of'(Print Nanw)
forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report Is true.
Slgneturs of Recorded Holder or Agent S^C/ /~"X i ^ M ~ " T Date
AgenrsAddress [^./\, ^ 4o \LS -RAXI SJL'TE
UW-JiTi I^SH
Telephone Number Fax Number
~6. Work to be recorded and distributed. Wthe mining land where work was pdrtormetf.WmiMtt GGomnanv thla form. - '' i.-'
U/HlraO' C/Oflr ^Mining Claim Number. Or If work was done on other eligible mining land, show In this column the location number Indicated on the claim map.
*9
eg
g
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TB 7827
1234567
1234568
lizos^^i
Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.
16 ha
12
2
llo ""Vfd
Column Totals
I.. '-'1 i j,"*? f**" *Value of work ywi i vMia^nf vii uitBf
dalm or,othef mining land.
126,826
0
S 8, 892
••sff^^q
13 7^9
Value of work applied to this claim.
2 .N/A
S24,000
S 4,000
0
n
Value of work assigned to other mining claims.
1 8 2 'S24.000
0
0
D
-
. . .
^9
Bank. Value of work to be distributed at ajuture date.
) frS2.825
0
14,892
" 39 7^*?y '
397/^7l, t do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under
(Print FuN Name)subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to
the claim where the work was done.Signature Holdacw Agent Authorized in Writing Date
6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.
Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check (** ) in the boxes below to show how
you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:
53 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated.
D 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or
D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or
D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):
Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary. ;
For Office Use OnlyReceived Stamp
0241 (02/MI
RECEIVED
MAR 2 4 1993 ftTW
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT
Deemed Approved Date
Date Approved
Approved for Recording by
Date Notification Sent
Total Value el Credit Approved
Mining Recorder (Signature)
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Development nd Mine*
Mlnlstere du Developpement du Nord t dee mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit
Irtat des coOts sux fins du credit devaluation
Mining Act/Lol sur les mines
Transaction NO./N* de transaction
. 00/31
2. l 8296Personal information collected on this form la obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining dalm(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 1S9 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7204.
Las renseignements personnels contenus dans la presents formule sont recueilHs en vertu de la U) sur les mines et sen/front a tenlr a Jour un registre des concessions minleres. Adresser touts question sur la collece de cos renseignements au chef provincial des terrains mlnlers, ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159. rue Cedar, 4* stage, Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 8A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain
Type
Type
Amount Montant
Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs
Totals Total global
2. Indirect Costs/CoQts Indlrects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable aa assessmeni work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, lea coOta Indlrects ne sont pas admissible* en tanl que iravaux devaluation.
Type
Transportation Transport
Food and Lodging Nourriture et h4bergementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation etDemobilisation
Description
Type
^Trv^k
i^AOtOJ'VA^bi It
T^u^l
Amount Montan!
1 1 te.ar
TC& -90
3tfD.3tl
4&.20
Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partial des coOts Indlrects
Amount AHowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'exc4dant pae 20 H dee coOta directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur totale du credit (Total of Direct and Allowable devaluationIndirect eactal flottl dM eaOtt dined
Totals Total global
3W**-Jty
4&.JO
^
:2fe//.^
\Mo4.y\ttf&.tZ
*t Indirect* (dmlulbla*
Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : Le titulaire enregistr* sera tenu de verifier les defenses demandees dans le present etat des coOts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a cet effet. SI la verification n'esl pas effectuee, le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux devaluation pr6sent6s.
Filing Discounts Remises pour dtfpdt
1. Work filed within two years of completion Is claimed at 10OTfe of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
1. Les travaux d6po*6s dans les deux ana suivant leur achievement sont . rembourses a 100 M de la valeur totale susmentlonn*e du credit devaluation.
2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 504* of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:
Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed
ft*- - S 8
2. Les travaux deposes trols, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achievement sont rembourses a 50 W de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentlonne. Volr les calculs d-dessous.
Valeur totale du credit devaluationx 0,50 -
Evaluation totale demand**
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs
l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were Incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.
that as(Racord*4Jloldar. Agent, Position In Company)
to make this certlficatlc i P3 FO E l V (E D!
Attestation de I'ttat des coOts
J'atteste par la presents :quo les montants Indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces defenses ont M engagers pour effectuer les travaux devaluation Sur les terrains Indiquls dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.
l am authorized Et qu'a litre de je suis autorlse(Mulalre enraglstrt. repr4tantanl. pout occup* din* la compagnla)
a falre cette attestation.
P
0212 (04*1)
MAR 2 4 19S8
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT t, lorsJju'Dans cane formula, loraJju'll designs des personnas, la masculln ast utlllsa au sans neuira
W*** m ' M inistry of'OntariO Northern Oevetopmentxxi i*.w*i INX and M|n9g
Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMining Act, Subeectlon M(2} and 66(9)', R.8.0.1MO
Numbtr (offlot UM)
^flftO .001^2.amem FUes ResearchAssesamem Imaging
Personal information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of subsections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section a of the Mining Act. the information is a public record. This Information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6BS.
Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240. - Please type or print in ink.
1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name
2. l 8296Client Number
BvM
Telephone Number
Fax Number
l C 'i-^n. HName
Address
Client Number
Telephone Number
Fax Number
2. Type of work performed: Check ( s ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.
D Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, r r Physical: drilling, stripping, f i Rehabilitation assays and work under section 18 (regs) LO trenching and associated assays L-1
Work Type t* r ill Core. *3*cxv
X^rtU C^cnre. .^Q.*wp\C. r
Dates Work e , . Performed From 0^- , O*f , \*ft
Day l Month | YMTGlobal Positioning System Data (if available)
wS^
fc To ps"i OH i n^g?Day 1 Monm | Ytw
Township/Area
^U.K\f?vC\M or G-Plan Nujpber
Office Use
Commodity
Total S Value of Work Claimed 2,1 , ^jCf*
NTS Reference
Mining Division J[ i P 1
Resident Geologist A
Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.
3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)
N^^lCI^rJ^(^^^V-^ MJ.Address __ l /*\ i ' ^^D^ ~ 3L3& t^L-sJ o\ . 1 erCCnr^-C fVuvray) o rv^H 3-VlName 7 ' ' '
Address
Name
Address U\
4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Age
HECETVtL^ MAR 2 ^ 1998
Telephone Number iJjl ^io*-/ * SS^^-N"
Fax Number ^^.
Telephone Number
Fax Number
Te ephone Number
Fax Number
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICF
ill
*T") . j ~~r~ \ * i1, KccVJ kW/wvx ~^' ICwriiX^^.S ,, , do he^by certify that 1 have personal knowledge of the facts Set
(Print Name)
forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.
Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent
fc Work to be recorded and distributed. Work canonlv b. assigned to dalm* that are cpntifluou. (adjoining) the mining land where work was performed, at tfie'time worf! was performed. A map ahcwfoglne ooottguou* link must accompany this form. . .,-f--. i-t-t-* ';.-.* !-v . ,- . .^ . r- "-^ *" \
t .
Mining Claim Number. Or If work waa done on other eligible mining land, *how In thle column the location number Indicated on the claim map.
eg
eg
eg
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g10
11
12
13
14
15
TB7827
1234567
1234568
l ^O 23-ZL l
Number of Claim Unit*. For other mining land, IM hectare*.
16 ha
12
2
/fo unrrS
Column Totals
WHftftft 00Value of wont performed on thte claim or. other mining land. ,.., ,
S26, 825
- , ;-r^ o-^i.
S 8, 892
^.k925.
1 "^ - i.- le
.i 'V""1 ' 4
: .' ': i '0.n -' -.
t - .'
31. 3^7-VC^olOl^S . do hereb
^ ) (Print Fun Nairn) ' .
Value of work applied to tMadalm.
2 .N/A
*24,000 '
S 4,000
O
ftt
0
Value of work aaalgned to other mlnlngclalrju. . ~**
1 Q S, :9- V l.' ' '.'.. 'HI-
124,000
i-.*i-.-..*;: Q" :
0
' •--•fi ' *" '
. .. .-
..v, m^~
v in'V-a?r-n' . :!.'""'"'." x
-1
(9
Hfj \Bank. Value of w\ to be dlatrlbuted V M future date. \
o \S2,825 ^
0
S4.892
lo'cP/ i5?P9-'
t
fi* V i - , . - ' -
i*;': r. - /r-, r
^2Z. SP?.J— — —
y certify that the above work credits are eligible under
tf^' s
subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous clalrrts or for application to
the claim where the work was done.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Authorized In Oat*
6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.
Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check (** ) In the boxes below to show how
you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:
0 1. Credits are to be cut back from th'e Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 o'rTas Indicated.
D 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or
D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or
D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):
Note: If you have not indicated followed by option number
ASSESSMENT! - -leted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first,
For Office Use OnlyRictlvtd Stamp
MlfOtM)
Dearmd Approved Daw
Dan Approved
Data Notification sent
Total Value of Credit Approvea
Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Slg iatajreT
rtario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit
iMl
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under action 8 of the Mining Act, the information is a public record. This Information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 686.
Work Type
1VM\ G-eoUms4-v^ * * O
1 @ r- y\ *\ l C. \ OjT\
^ai^pi^T^CC^^e.two* ( L~~~-s
Units of WorkDepending on the type of work, list the number of hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metre* of grid line, number of samples, etc.
a\Cj?kr\(k l^t^eCMrcO*r
Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).
Transportation Costs
Food and Lodging Costs
^FCEIVED
AV * l tr-7*-
Cost Per Unit of work
Tola Value of Assessment WorkMAR 2 i\ 1998 If ^[bO-^
Calculations of Filing Discount ^SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
T tr* Vrf
Total Cost
c? if. CO
3?A.cm
^21,33(1. ro
* ^/,3^7 C O
1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 100*^ of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at SO0/*) of the Total
Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:
TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 Total S value of worked claimed.
Note:- Work older than S years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a request fer verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Certification verifying costs:
____ , do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may (pi**** prim full mm*)
reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on
the accompanying Declaration of Work form as
to make this certification.(recorded hold*r,a9em, or *tcMJomp*ny position with slgtdng authority)
l am authorized
Ministry ofNorthern Development nd Mines
Minister* du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario
June 12,1998
Raymond J. KnowlesSUDBURY CONTACT MINES LIMITEDc/o W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.807-365 BAY STREETTORONTO. ONTARIOM5H-2V1
We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.
If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.
Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steve Beneteau by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.
Yours sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section
Correspondence ID: 12411
Copy for: Assessment Library
Work Report Assessment Results
Submission Number: 2 .18296
Date Correspondence Sent: June 12,1998 AssessonSteve Beneteau
Transaction Number
W9880.00191
Section:16 Drilling PDRILL
First Claim Number
1202721
Township(s) l Area(s)
LUNDY
Status
Approval
Approval Date
June 11,1998
Transaction Number
W9880.00192
Section:17 Assays ASSAY
First Claim Number
1202721
Township(s) l Area(s)
LUNDY
Status
Approval
Approval Date
June 11,1998
Correspondence to:Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, ON
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON
Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Raymond J. KnowlesSUDBURY CONTACT MINES LIMITEDTORONTO, ONTARIO
SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LIMITED TORONTO, ONTARIO
Page: 1Correspondence ID: 12411
l j
;l
I2bl6946i s -'
i i
1212048- i
l- --, -. "''
120594^' . . . ,' ; li.- V- l * - u-\
7*700r-x i 767004' vko -^ y) /"! ] - - '' feo
F/'/f-^fifn /^
o! I4atui3l Ree t irces
ofNorthern ao^*
Ontariogeology rcfcrence-CQBALT
RESIDENT GEO.
LAK0 DISPOSITI
PUN
3-3439TOWNSHIP
TEMAGAMI
LUNDYLARDER LAKE LAM Ttrus/*. BOTHY m WM
TIMISr
Sc*to1:20MM
1000
1000 MTJ 300) MCt If*"
Contour Interval 10 Mvtrwft
SYMBOLSBoundary
Towr'hip, Meridian, F acline ....
Poad allowance; surveyed........
shore 1 ,)*.
Lot/Concession; surveyed. . .
unsurveyftd
Parcel; surveyed . . . . . . . . . , .
Right- of- WF y; rattfrailway
utility.
Reservation . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cliff, Pi', Pile . . . . . . . .
Contour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interpc lated . . . . .
/^proximate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
Depression. . .
Contn point (he izontai^
Food j land . . . .
Mine iaad fram * . . . . . . . .
Pipe rie (above grrund) .
Ra way; dingle trac*.
double track
i-,' antic.. -w. . .
Road; 'lighway, county, township
access . . . . . . . . . .
trail, bush
Shoreline (orienal). . . . . . . .
Transmission lint, . . . . . . . . . .
Wooded area . . . . . . . . . . .
WSPf SIYiGN OF CROWN LANDSPatent
bui race S Mining Rights
Surface Right;; Only
Mining Right? Only
Lease
Suridce '* Mining Rights , . .
Surfara Rights Only . . , . . . . .
Min'rtg Rights Only ..... .
Lie' neb of Occupation
Jrder-in Council.
Canci '!ad . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.r e
..V
..B
.Vf.
.0-
sand
NOTICE OF FORESTRY ACTIVITYTHIS TOWNSHIP l AREA FALLS WITHIN THE .m
AND MAY BETHE MNR UNIT FORESTER FOR THIS AREA CAN BECONTACTED AT : P.O. BOX 38
LAKESHORE DRIVETEMAGAMI, ONT.POH 2HO705-569-3622
Map ba^o and land disposition draf ing Dy Surveys ind Mapping Branch, Ministry of Nature, hot 'jrr,es.
AHFAS W THDfl/'VN FRO ft 5 DISPx^ SITION
Mf, C - Mining Right* Only
SHO Surtac* Rights Only
M * S - MJntr-j PTX! Si 1 -r^w Right
n*(S|) S IC. 36/80 W.2/83 25/ZA
SEC. 36/80 W.II/85
OhD-R NO.O-L-I8/9G NER OPENS W-l 1/85 NER
THIS TOWNSHIP FALLS WITHIN THE TEMAGAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLANING AREA. SPECIAL WORKING CONDITIONS MAY APPLY TO EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES. FOR MORE DETAILS PLEASE CONTACT:
DISTRICT MANAGER. NORTH BAY DISTRICT MINISTRY, NATURAL RESOURCES
THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AH- DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.
CIRCULATED APRIL 19/88 ARCHIVED APRIL 3, 1993
ARCHIVED APRIL 18, 1997
The disposition of land, location of !o', fab-' -,id parcel bounds i,*,, this index was compi't * .; administrative p, irposea only