Subglacial deformation of trees within overridden foreland strata, Bering Glacier, Alaska P. Jay Fleisher a,e, * , Matthew S. Lachniet b,e , Ernest H. Muller c,e , Palmer K. Bailey d,e a Earth Sciences Department, SUNY-Oneonta, Oneonta, NY, 13820-4015, USA b Department of Geoscience University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010, USA c Earth Sciences Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13210-2936, USA d CRREL (retired), Anchor Point, AK, 99556-9702, USA e Prince William Sound Science Center, Cordova, AK, 99574, USA Received 20 September 2003; received in revised form 26 January 2005; accepted 26 January 2005 Available online 20 October 2005 Abstract The foreland stratigraphy overridden during recent Bering Glacier surges bears evidence of subglacial deformation. The pre- existing, fine textured substrate (till and diamicton) experienced diminished strength because of saturation, thus resulting in shallow mobilization and the formation of a new till of limited thickness. Glacial coupling with well drained sediment resulted in ploughing that generated a diamicton that retains vestiges of outwash sorting and stratification. The outwash sequence extending decimeters beneath the surface till contains four prominent sub-meter sand beds. Each sand bed holds multiple small, fossil trees still rooted in underlying layers of gravel. Virtually all trees in the upper two sand beds are deformed. Several are offset by centimeter to decimeter horizontal shears confined to thin, silt, and clay-rich zones at the base of each sand bed. Trees that escaped shearing are warped and kinked. Deformed trees are present at depths that range from 15.76 to 5.31 m. beneath potential ice/substrate interface surfaces. The most likely source of deforming stress in this foreland setting is related to glacial advance. The style and orientation of tree deformation are consistent with the direction of ice movement. Therefore, the occurrence of deformed trees is attributed to stress applied by overriding ice. D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Substrate deformation; Overriding glacial ice 1. Introduction Bering Glacier, Alaska is known to have surged re- peatedly in historic time (Post, 1972; Muller and Fle- isher, 1995; Fleisher et al., 1995; Molnia and Post, 1995). Each of the past two surges (1965–67 and 1993–95) were punctuated by jokulhlaups along the eastern sector ice front. Observations during the 1993–95 surge, coupled with stratigraphy exposed because of flood erosion of bluffs indicate that pre-existing sediment was deformed when overridden by ice. Although recognition of sub- strate deformation is not new (Alley, 1989; Alley, 1993; Benn, 1995; Boulton, 1979; Boulton and Hindmarsh, 1987; Clarke, 1987; Clarke et al., 1984, Hart et al., 1990), seldom can the cause and effect be so clearly and directly linked. 0169-555X/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.01.013 * Corresponding author. Earth Sciences Department, SUNY- Oneonta, Oneonta, NY, 13820-4015, USA. Tel.: +1 607 436 3375; fax: +1 607 436 3547. E-mail address: [email protected] (P.J. Fleisher). Geomorphology 75 (2006) 201 – 211 www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph
11
Embed
Subglacial deformation of trees within overridden foreland strata, Bering Glacier, Alaska
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph
Geomorphology 75 (
Subglacial deformation of trees within overridden foreland strata,
Bering Glacier, Alaska
P. Jay Fleisher a,e,*, Matthew S. Lachniet b,e, Ernest H. Muller c,e, Palmer K. Bailey d,e
a Earth Sciences Department, SUNY-Oneonta, Oneonta, NY, 13820-4015, USAb Department of Geoscience University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010, USAc Earth Sciences Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13210-2936, USA
d CRREL (retired), Anchor Point, AK, 99556-9702, USAe Prince William Sound Science Center, Cordova, AK, 99574, USA
Received 20 September 2003; received in revised form 26 January 2005; accepted 26 January 2005
Available online 20 October 2005
Abstract
The foreland stratigraphy overridden during recent Bering Glacier surges bears evidence of subglacial deformation. The pre-
existing, fine textured substrate (till and diamicton) experienced diminished strength because of saturation, thus resulting in shallow
mobilization and the formation of a new till of limited thickness. Glacial coupling with well drained sediment resulted in ploughing
that generated a diamicton that retains vestiges of outwash sorting and stratification.
The outwash sequence extending decimeters beneath the surface till contains four prominent sub-meter sand beds. Each sand
bed holds multiple small, fossil trees still rooted in underlying layers of gravel. Virtually all trees in the upper two sand beds are
deformed. Several are offset by centimeter to decimeter horizontal shears confined to thin, silt, and clay-rich zones at the base of
each sand bed. Trees that escaped shearing are warped and kinked. Deformed trees are present at depths that range from 15.76 to
5.31 m. beneath potential ice/substrate interface surfaces.
The most likely source of deforming stress in this foreland setting is related to glacial advance. The style and orientation of tree
deformation are consistent with the direction of ice movement. Therefore, the occurrence of deformed trees is attributed to stress
and imbricate cobble gravel. Dispersed within the out-
wash are multiple, uniformly thick, coarse, tan sand
beds covering a thin peat horizon made conspicuous
by the occurrence of in situ, small rooted trees.
The most complete exposure of these units is in a
bluff referred to as the Waterworks site (Fig. 1). Here,
the upper 7.9 m of this 26 m high bluff consists of an
bolder tillQ that is assumed to have been deposited
during the 1965–67 surge. It is anomalously thick
compared to the sub-meter 1993–95 till and consists
of three sub-units, each of similar thickness (2.5–2.9
m). Each has uniform textural properties, yet slightly
different erosional resistance as expressed in breaks in
slope. Although thicker here than elsewhere, this till is
commonly very firm, light gray, and has a fine-to-
medium sandy matrix that holds rounded and striated
pebble clasts. Its lower contact is transitional to a 2.4 to
2.7 m thick diamicton, which is also very firm and
unsorted, yet contains decimeter zones of crudely strat-
ified gravel. A pebbly, sandy matrix holds 0.5 m thick
lenticular clusters of clast-supported, subangular and
subrounded gravel, and isolated sub-meter size
boulders. A distinct, wavy, and irregular lower contact
unconformably separates this diamicton from an under-
lying 35–40 m outwash unit that dominates most bluff
exposures on the eastern foreland (Fig. 4). The lower
contact is not exposed within the Waterworks bluff.
As is typical elsewhere as well, the outwash gravel
contains several sub-meter thick sand beds. Four sand
beds are prominent in the Waterworks bluff. At the base
of each are millimeter-scale, peat layers covered by 1 to
4 cm of silt and clay. Sand bed thickness ranges be-
tween 0.33 and 0.67 m and each bed grades upward
from fine-to-coarse sand. Although generally lacking
internal stratification, each sand bed contains faint
expressions of what appears to be deformed, remnant
trough cross bedding. Perched ground water commonly
saturates the base of the upper two sand layers causing
slow seeping drips of water from peat rootlets during
summer months, hence the name bWeeping Peat
IslandQ.
5. Nature and occurrence of deformed trees
Each of the four sand beds (A through D, from
oldest to youngest in Fig. 4) within the Waterworks
bluff is host to multiple alder (Alnus crispa, sinuata),
cottonwood (Populus balsamifera, trichocarpa), and
small spruce (Picea sitchensis) (23 growth rings or
less) that stand in situ, rooted in underlying gravel
(personal communication, Dorothy Peteet). Where not
lost to slope retreat, the trees extend upward through the
overlying blanket of sand and into the overlying gravel
bed above. Still standing upright in the living position,
the trees are held firmly within the host. A few that
extend completely through the overlying gravel are
truncated along the silt and clay zone at the base of
the next higher sand bed. All of six trees within the two
upper sand beds (C and D) show some form of defor-
mation. Most are sheared by lateral offset at the base of
the trunk, whereas others are kinked or bent within the
host sand bed. (Figs. 5–8). Shears are confined within a
2–3 cm thick layer of silt and clay that drapes the lower
trunks of all trees at the base of all sand beds.
Six sheared trees within sand bed C range in diam-
eter from 7 to 10 cm, whereas the largest deformed tree
(19 cm) is 1.93 m higher in sand bed D. All trees are
sheared where they passed through the 2–3 cm silt and
clay layer and the base of sand beds C and D, yet they
remain rooted in underlying gravel. The amount of
offset ranges from 4 cm for the largest tree to 10–14
cm for trees in sand bed C. The bark of one offset tree is
flattened onto the shear plane, as if smeared during
deformation. The direction of offset favors an azimuth
of 1508 (S 308 E). This conforms to the orientation of
surface flutes on the surface of Weeping Peat Island
(Fleisher et al., 2004).
Bent trunks are the second most common style of
deformation. Trunk curvature is greatest within the
lower portion of sand bed C, with convex curvature
also to the southeast (Fig. 8). They regain vertical
orientation as they rise through the sand bed. Also
Fig. 5. Styles of tree deformation. Three different styles of fossil-tree deformation are observed. Each represents different expressions of a common
stress condition in which forces with a strong downglacier component were exerted (arrows). Trees in the living position are rooted in gravel and
buried initially by sand, then gravel prior to being deformed. All trees remained rooted during deformation. Stippling represents basal silt and clay
within the sand. Tree #1 is offset from its root by lateral displacement that is confined to the basal silt and clay. Above the kink in tree #2, the trunk
remains upright, whereas the lower trunk is inclined. This implies differential movement of the sand across the gravel while the tree remained
rooted. Tree #3 shows a distinct curvature and tension fractures in the lower trunk where deforming forces were greatest. All trees are truncated by
offset where entering the overlying sand bed.
Fig. 4. Waterworks stratigraphic section. Deformed trees remain buried in sand beds A and B.
P.J. Fleisher et al. / Geomorphology 75 (2006) 201–211 205
Fig. 6. Trees rooted in gravel are laterally offset from the roots along a
plane of failure confined within a thin (2–4 cm) silt and clay layer
capping peat at the base of sand bed C. Direction of offset (shown by
arrows) is parallel to the direction of overriding ice movement. (a) A
cottonwood tree (7 cm diameter) rooted in gravel is offset approxi-
mately 10 cm. The displaced, lower trunk (above the arrow) is shown
in the position it occupied when excavated. The top of the trunk was
cut to obtain a wood sample. (b) A spruce tree, offset 12–14 cm,
shows lower trunk curvature and prominent horizontal tension frac-
ture. Orientation of deformation is consistent with overriding ice
movement to the south-southeast.
ig. 7. Kinked spruce tree trunk rooted in gravel. Trunk leans to the
outh-southeast below kink midway through enclosing sand bed C.
pper tree segment remains vertical through overlying gravel, where
is truncated at the base of overlying sand bed D (90 cm ice axe for
cale).
P.J. Fleisher et al. / Geomorphology 75 (2006) 201–211206
noteworthy is that the northwest, upglacier side of all
tree trunks shows evidence of abrasion and all pre-
served limbs are bent toward the southeast.
The kinked style of deformation is best displayed by
a spruce tree (12 cm diameter) within sand bed C (Fig.
7) and rooted in underlying gravel. The lower 30 cm of
the tree trunk leans to the southeast, whereas the upper
portion maintains a vertical orientation through the sand
and overlying gravel. Abrupt truncation occurs as the
tree encounters the fine-grained silt and clay layer at the
base of the overlying sand bed D. The upper-most
segment of the tree is missing, presumably lost to
bluff retreat. Adjacent to the linked tree are small, 2–
3 cm diameter alder that are offset to the southeast
approximately 10 cm from their base and root ball.
The least conspicuous style of deformation is repre-
sented by a distinct curvature in the lower 20–30 cm
trunk segment of several trees. Centimeter-scale, hori-
zontal tension fractures are distributed across the zone
of greatest flexure. This style of deformation is con-
fined to the lower portion of sand bed C, directly above
the silt and clay that accommodates lateral displacement
of adjacent trees. As with offset trees, the directional
orientation of deformation is to the south-southeast
(Fig. 8). As with the kinked tree, trunk diameter is
slightly larger (12 cm) than trees that were offset,
thus suggesting resistance to failure.
An analysis of the growth rings (Smith and Rennie,
1991; Shortle et al., 2003; Shroder, 1980; Blasing and
F
s
U
it
s
Fig. 8. Bent spruce tree trunk. Only the base of this 12 cm diameter
tree is deformed. Arching curvature and tension fractures indicate
deformation by directional stress from left-to-right, which coincides
with the direction of overriding ice (south-southeast). The tree is
rooted in gravel beneath sand bed C (90 cm ice axe for scale).
P.J. Fleisher et al. / Geomorphology 75 (2006) 201–211 207
Fritts, 1976) shows a repetitious pattern that is consis-
tent for trees from all four sand beds. The pattern
consists of thinner rings during the last 8 to 13 years
of growth, representing approximately half of the living
period. All trees, deformed and not deformed, contain
the same pattern. The thinner outer rings tend to be
thinnest on the south-southeasterly side of the trees, an
orientation that corresponds to the direction from which
the most severe weather approaches. Tree deformation
(offset, bent nor kinked) has no effect on the occurrence
or orientation of this pattern.
6. Discussion
6.1. Origin of 1993–95 deformation till
As illustrated in Fig. 2, basal ice that was thrust
forward during the surge was relatively free of debris,
thus indicating that very little new, subglacial material
was being transported. Yet, the overriding ice resulted
in the deposition of a new, sub-meter, fluted till and
push moraine. The only possible sediment source for
the new till was the overridden substrate. We suggest
that subglacial saturation by infiltrating, silt-laden melt-
water that effectively saturated the pre-existing, older
till and diamicton. Saturation led to loss of shear
strength, followed by mobilization as overburden pres-
sure exceeded substrate resistance.
Field evidence in support of this is represented by
the common occurrence of new till resting directly upon
overridden and flattened alder. Lateral continuity of this
till with the till of a push moraine indicates synchro-
nous formation. Indeed, substrate mobilization ob-
served at the ice front during the surge demonstrates
that a newly developed deformable bed was squeezed
and extruded from beneath the glacier. As the moraine
formed it was progressively overridden and in a con-
stant state of formation. Similarly, saturated, subglacial
deformation till was forced into basal ice grooves, thus,
forming flutes.
6.2. Origin of pre-1993–95 diamicton
Field evidence suggests several possible modes of
origin for the diamicton. Fine-grained texture, firmness,
and lack of sorting support deposition by ice, but zones
of crude stratification suggest substrate mobilization
that involved incorporation of till within underlying
units, including outwash. Although coarse, well-
drained outwash gravel typically maintains low pore-
water pressure and retains high sediment strength to
resist deformation by overburden pressure, fast basal
sliding (indicated in Fig. 2) is known to initiate plough-
ing (Boulton and Hindmarsh, 1987; Brown et al., 1987;
Benn and Evans, 1996; Benn and Evans, 1998), which
in turn would incorporate till within underlying out-
wash. This mechanism would account for remnants of
sorting, vestiges of stratification, and lenses of lag
boulders that are commonly found within the matrix
supported diamicton beneath the older till. Assuming
the till was deposited during the 1965–67 surge, this
mechanism would suggest that the diamicton might
have formed synchronous with the till by substrate
deformation during that surge.
An alternative to ploughing would involve the addi-
tion of a silt and clay matrix through infiltration of
highly turbid subglacial water, thus placing fines within
pore spaces of otherwise permeable outwash gravel.
The net effect would be to reduce drainage capacity
and impeding water escape, which in turn would give
rise to increased pore-water pressure, diminished
strength, and subsequent deformation through mobili-
P.J. Fleisher et al. / Geomorphology 75 (2006) 201–211208
zation. Considering the lenticular clusters of clast-sup-
ported gravel and isolated sub-meter size boulders
within the diamicton, and the unconformable lower
contact, another possibilities might include flood-relat-
ed, grain-supported, scouring debris flows known to
occur in conjunction with outburst floods (Russell et
al., 2002). The debris from such a flow would, in a
single event, be deposited on a surface locally scoured
into outwash.
The lack of soil development along the diamicton/till
contact has multiple implications. Either, 1) the diamic-
ton is the product of bed deformation beneath overrid-
ing ice that also deposited the till, 2) the time between
events was too brief for soil formation to occur, 3) the
diamicton and till are of different ages, but any soil that
may have formed on the diamicton was subsequently
effaced by the advance that deposited the till. This is
unlikely because the contact between the diamicton and
till is gradational, not erosional. None of these alter-
natives offer definitive information related to the histo-
ry of events leading to diamicton formation.
7. Deformation by overriding ice
7.1. Stratigraphic factors
The thickness of the deforming layer beneath the ice/
substrate interface represents the depth of deformation,
which is determined by the depth at which shear strength
exceeds shear stress. Water escape properties governed
by grain size will influence pore-water pressure, which
in turn controls shear strength (Clarke, 1987; Benn and
Evans, 1998; Boulton and Hindmarsh, 1987; Alley,
1989; Hart et al., 1990). Therefore, the most effective
shear stress would be confined to strata-bound zones
where grain size favors saturation, high pore-water pres-
sure, and reduced shear strength. Under these condi-
tions, deformation will be most extensive in units of
finer grain size, whereas units consisting of coarser
clasts above and below will remain undeformed.
Other factors to consider include the amount of
infiltrating water, the depths of the deformable layers
below the ice/substrate interface, and the number of
buried fossil-trees. Because subglacial water infiltration
diminishes with depth below the ice/substrate interface,
the greatest potential for substrate deformation also
diminish with depth. Therefore, deformation of trees
within the upper sand beds (C and D) would be most
pronounced. Indeed, the most conspicuous tree defor-
mation is in these beds. This supports the notion that
stratigraphic variation may control the location of de-
formation in the substrate.
Such is the case at Waterworks where it appears that
subglacial water infiltrated several meters of coarse out-
wash to saturate the thin silt and clay veneer at the base of
the upper two sand beds. Saturation caused the develop-
ment of positive pore pressure, which in turn reduced
shear strength leading to strata-bound deformation. The
most common expression of this deformation is repre-
sented by the lateral offset of trees displaced as much as
14 cm along shear planes that are confined to the silt and
clay-rich layer at the base of the two shallowest sand
beds (C and D) (Fig. 6a and b). The directional compo-
nent of all styles of deformation is very consistent and
parallels the direction of overriding ice. Trees held sta-
tionary by a firm root system were offset along shear
planes within a layer of lower competent silt and clay.
Furthermore, the trunk deformation (sheared and bent) is
concentrated within the lower portion of all sand beds.
The undeformed, still vertical trees trunks indicate a lack
of deformation within the upper portion of sand beds C
and D. It appears that lateral displacement by shearing
along the silt and clay layer shifted sand beds C and D to
the southeast as cohesive units, thus causing various
forms of tree deformation. The displacement of trees,
stacked vertically throughout the section, represents
compound lateral movement, as each sand bed and over-
lying gravel was shoved to the southeast along incom-
petent basal silt and clay.
The style of deformation represented by the kinked
tree (Fig. 7) also formed in association with shearing at
the base of the sand bed. The slightly larger diameter
tree (12 cm at the trunk base), however, offered suffi-
cient resistance to avoid failure by shearing. Instead,
differential, lateral movement at the base of the sand
shifted the entire bed and overlying units several cen-
timeters in the downglacier direction. The location of
the kink high in the sand unit suggests that while the
root system held the tree base firmly in place, the trunk
was tilted as the lower portion of the host sand was
differentially displaced more than the upper portion.
The still-vertical, upper trunk, held within the upper
sand and overlying gravel, shows no sign of deforma-
tion. Bedding within the upper sand remains undis-
turbed, which indicates differential movement was
concentrated within the basal silt and clay. The offset
of trees elsewhere along sand bed C confirms differen-
tial movement at the base of the sand. We propose that
stresses were greatest along the base of the upper two
sand units, and that while smaller diameter trees were
offset, others with slightly large trunk diameters de-
formed differently.
The flexing of tree trunks expressed in a broadly
arching curvature might be attributed to causes other
P.J. Fleisher et al. / Geomorphology 75 (2006) 201–211 209
than post-burial deformation if it were not for the
consistent orientation of the curved segments, the hor-
izontally oriented tension fractures that occupy the most
severely bent segment of the trunks, and the tree ring
pattern common to all trees. The shape and extent to
which the trunk is bent would be accommodated by the
same sense of sand bed displacement and stress distri-
bution proposed for the kinked tree. Within a sand bed
that is laterally displaced by movement along the basal
silt and clay layer, the directional stresses would be
most evident in the lower portion of a firmly rooted tree
where differential movement is the greatest. This
explains the observed orientation of bent trunks and
the distribution of associated tension fractures.
The pattern of growth rings recognized in trees from
all four sand beds, yields interesting implications re-
garding the history of deformation. All styles of tree
deformation indicate that stress was applied from the
north-northwest, thus, producing deformation to the
south-southeast. This is completely out of phase with
stresses responsible for anomalously stunted outer tree
rings. This suggests that the pattern of ring thickness
was controlled entirely by conditions that existing prior
to tree burial and before deforming forces were applied.
7.2. Depth of deformation
The common unidirectional aspect of stresses re-
quired to produce all styles of tree deformation are
attributed to overriding ice movement to the southeast.
The lack of a glacial till within the outwash sequence
above the sand beds implies that deformation at depth
may be linked to the emplacement of the overlying
diamicton and/or till units. The undulating, irregular
unconformity along the lower contact of the diamicton
represents an interval of erosion during which evidence
for an additional overriding event may have been re-
moved. This unconformity, however, is absent else-
where in the stratigraphy of Weeping Peat Island,
thus, suggesting local significance.
The directional orientation of tree deformation is
consistent with surface flutes thought to have been
produced by overriding ice during the 1966–67 surge,
as depicted on U. S. Geological Survey aerial photos
(663-28, 9-2-66, Bering and 663-23, 9-2-66, Bering).
Each style of deformation represents a response to a
common stress condition that penetrated deeply into the
substrate. The minimum depth to which deforming
stresses penetrated the Waterworks section may be esti-
mated from the distance between the overriding ice/
substrate interface and the deformed, tree-bearing strata.
The position of the ice/substrate interface depends upon
which interpretation for the origin of the diamicton and
overlying till is favored. The overlying till is anoma-
lously thick, consisting of three zones that are only
distinguished by the relative resistance to erosion. All
three may have been deposited during a single overrid-
ing event or by three separate events. Unfortunately,
field evidence leading to a confident interpretation of
which alternative is correct is lacking, thus, both are
possible. Similarly, several alternative processes may
account for the origin of the diamicton, all of which
are also related to the ice/substrate interface. Because
the depth of deformation is greatest when measured to
the base of sand beds C, it is used to calculate the
minimum depth to which deforming stress penetrated.
Several possible alternatives exist. If a single over-
riding event deposited all 7.9 m of till, as well as the
diamicton, then the minimum depth of deformation
would be measured from the top of the upper most
till to the base of sand bed C, a distance of 15.76 m (see
Fig. 4). If the anomalously thick till is the product of
multiple overriding events, however, as suggested by
differential resistance to erosion, then the depth of
penetrating stress would be less. From the top of till-
B, the depth is 12.76 m, and from till-A it is 10.26 m. If
overriding ice formed the diamicton, then the distance
is 7.86 m. If the unconformity at the base of the
diamicton is a surface of glacial erosion, the depth
would be 5.3 m. Although a definitive minimum
depth cannot be determined from existing field data,
the forces of overriding ice reached much more deeply
into the underlying strata than the thickens of a typical
deforming layer (Benn and Evans, 1998).
8. Conclusion
Clean basal ice overrode the foreland of Bering
Glacier during the 1993–95 surge, thus, very little
new, subglacial material was deposited, yet, a new
till formed at the ice/substrate interface. The overrid-
den foreland primarily consists of pre-existing till, a
till-like diamicton, and outwash. The new till devel-
oped as highly turbid, subglacial meltwater invaded
and saturated the substrate, thus, causing positive
pore-water pressure at shallow depths of less than
one meter. Fine textured sediment (till and diamicton)
experienced diminished shear strength leading to mo-
bilization and pervasive deformation, thus, generating
a newly formed deformation till. Coupling at the ice/