SUB: SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION … · Dear Sir, This has reference to the above mentioned subject matter. ... investment will be Rs. 150 – 300 Crores, considering this

1

Aug. 14, 2017

To,

The Director IA (Industry-II)

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

Government of India,

Indira Paryavarn Bhavan,

Aliganj, Jor Bagh Road,

New Delhi – 110 003

SUB: SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR ENVIRONMENT

CLEARANCE FOR PROPOSED EXPANSION OF SPECIALTY CHEMICALS,

PESTICIDE, FLUORO CHEMICALS & CAPTIVE POWER PLANT IN EXISTING

UNIT OF M/s. SRF LIMITED, PLOT NO. D-2/1, VILLAGE: SUVA, GIDC PHASE II,

DAHEJ, TALUKA: VAGRA, DISTRICT: BHARUCH (GUJARAT)

CATEGORY: A-5(f), 5(b), 4(d) & 1(d): UNIT LOCATED IN GIDC INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

(INDUSTRIAL SECTOR PROJECT)

REF: MINUTES OF MEETING OF 25th

EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE (INDUSTRY-

2) MEETING HELD DURING 5th

to 7th

July 2017

Dear Sir,

This has reference to the above mentioned subject matter. We are submitting herewith

Additional Information required by you to obtain Environment Clearance (EC) for our

proposed expansion of Specialty Chemicals, Pesticide, Fluoro Chemicals & Captive Power

Plant in existing unit. (Industrial Sector Project-Category: A-5(f), 5(b), 4(d) & 1(d)).

We hope you would find the same in order and oblige us by granting EC.

Thanking you.

2

i. Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC) plan for five years with 2.5 % of the project cost

Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC) / CSR at Dahej

SRF’s CSR Action at Dahej – Project Brief

SRF Dahej in Brief

SRF Ltd is a leading multi-business entity engaged in textiles, chemicals, packaging films, and

engineering plastics operational in six states in India. At Dahej in Gujarat, it has engaged

with Fluoro & Speciality Chemicals with eleven projects and 1250 Employees as on April

2017.

CSR Initiatives at Dahej

The Business initiated its CSR interventions in 2013-14 near its factory establishment at

Dahej under the Public-Private Partnership Model (PPP) with focus on primary education,

community infrastructure development and sanitation. Our Primary Education initiatives are

aimed at improving the quality of education in rural govt. schools, with focus on girl child

education. Activities that lead to such developments include improvement of school

infrastructure, appointment of para teachers and remedial classes for academically weak

children, provision of computer aided learning facilities, capacity building of teachers and

the community etc. The highlights of the CSR interventions at Dahej are as follows:

1. Education Initiatives

Model School Programme:

As a part of CSR mandate of SRF Ltd., SRF Foundation in collaboration with Dept. of

Education of Gujarat initiated Model School Project in 10 villages of Vagra block, Dahej, in

2016-17. The school is under 10 Km radius from SRF plant location and is aimed to impact

2624 students, 64 teachers and 134 SMC members. Under this project, the schools will

undergo physical transformation by establishing facilities like, proper sanitation, access to

clean drinking water, technology application, mobile science education, sports and games

promotion, libraries and science lab developments. Leadership skill development, health

and hygiene practices among the students, encouraging girl students to continue higher

education, increase in attendance and development of strong community involvement are

also some of the focus areas of the project. Till date following has been done under the

project:

• SMC Meeting and development of collaborative matrix

• Head master leadership meeting

• Swachh Vidyalaya Programme, where 200 children and 15 teachers were sensitized

towards the need and importance of personal hygiene and creating a clean

environment at school, home and community. A students’ committee was also

formed to monitor the same

• Library setup in eight schools

• Sports promotion at cluster level

• Installation of play equipment

3

Establishment and operation of 11 IBM Kid smart Centres:

SRF in partnership with IBM and District Administration Bharuch has established Kid smart

Early Learning centres under PPP model in the 11 Govt. primary schools with the objective

to offer children from low socio-economic status communities’ good quality teaching-

learning opportunities with the use of technology. These benefits over 2000 school children.

The centre is a model in itself in terms of child friendly environment and its unique learning

module.

The first 6 centres were established in 2014-15 while another 5 centres were established in

2015-16 as part of the Programme expansion under the PPP mode and the district

administration- Bharuch has also contributed a total of Rs. 16 Lakhs for the infrastructure

development required for the establishment of these centres, while the equipment and

running cost have been provided by SRF. SRF has appointed 11 Vidya Volunteers (computer

teachers) in these schools to facilitate teaching-learning besides an overall coordination

with partners for its successful operations and maintenance.

Currently the Kid-smart Centres are running in the following schools with presence in 4

blocks in Bharuch district:

1. Govt. Primary School, Suva, Block Vagra

2. Govt. Primary School, Jolva, Block Vagra

3. Govt. Primary School (Girls), Dahej, Block Vagra

4. Govt. Primary School (Girls),, Lakhigam, Dahej, Block Vagra

5. Govt. Primary School (Girls),, Luvara, Dahej, Block Vagra

6. Govt. Primary School, Bhadbhut, Block Bharuch

7. Govt. Primary School (Girls), Bharuch, Block Bharuch

8. Govt. Primary School, Sudi, Block Amod

9. Govt. Primary School, Samani, Block Amod

10. Govt. Primary School (Boys), Jagaria, Block Jagaria

11. Govt. Primary School, Dumala Boidra, Block Jagaria

4

School infrastructure Development:

Improvement of physical infrastructure development and beautification of school premise

are also one of the focus areas under our primary education program and this is done in

consultation with the school authorities, SMC and the Village Panchayats. In 2015-16, the

integrated school infrastructure development works were undertaken at 2 Govt. Primary

Schools i.e., Suva and Jolva. As part to develop these schools as model schools, renovation

and painting of the school building have been done along with the development of the

school grounds with garden, installation of swings and play equipment for children,

renovation of toilet and drinking water facility etc.

5

Appointment of para Teachers and training Govt. Teachers:

In addition to the 11 Computer Teachers, SRF has appointed 3 Para teachers also in the Govt.

school Suva and Jolva to support the regular teaching activity in the supported schools.

Academic teachers’ training for all (Govt. teachers, Vidya Volunteers and Para teachers) is

also organized periodically to improve the overall quality of education in the schools. During

2015-16, 3 teachers’ training programs were organized covering all the 11 supported

schools.

School bus for girls at Dahej:

Non-availability of the high schools in village Suva and Jolva leads to the drop-out of many

girl students after the primary education. To deal with this issue, since 2013-14, a bus facility

has been provided for school children, especially girls, to commute from Suva & Jolva village

to Dahej high school, 12 kms away. This has improved the regularity and retention of girls in

the high schools as compared to the previous years. This facility will continue, on need basis,

in the years to come.

6

2. Community Infrastructure Development and Sanitation Initiatives

Development of Community Infrastructure at Jolva Village:

As part of the community/ village infrastructure development plan, SRF Dahej has

developed a community park at Jolva village near the factory. The park has been facilitated

with the development of a garden, plantation of trees and play equipment for children. The

park was inaugurated by the District Development Officer (DDO) on 14th August during a big

gathering of the community people.

Contribution for Swachh Bharat Abhiyan:

SRF in partnership with District Rural Development Agency (DRDA- Bharuch) had planned for

the construction of household toilets for BPL families in village Suva and Jolva to make these

village open defection free. This need was identified in consultation with the DRDA under

PPP mode in the presence of Dist Collector Bharuch. In 2014-15, SRF had contributed Rs.5

Lakhs to “Mukhyamantri Shri Swachchhata Nidhi Bharuch District".

7

3. Mid-Day Meal Programme with Akshaya Patra

As a new venture under the ‘Mid – Day Meal Program’, in 2016-18, SRF Foundation joined

hands with Akshaya Patra to ensure fresh hot food for 50,000 students of class 1 to 8

studying in more than 200 Government schools spread across Bharuch and Vagra blocks of

Bharuch district. The partnership will go on for three years, that is, from 2016 to 2019 and

the total budget of the initiative is Rs. 12.5 Crores in which SRF Foundation will help in

setting up a Centralized Kitchen for preparing the meals and Akshaya Patra will implement

the Programme. The initiative aims to provide healthy balanced meals to the children, while

also ensuring decrease in school drop outs and an increase in the enrolment.

Additional Proposed CSR Activities at SRF Dahej Site

We will continue to work towards developing Model Schools in Dahej and will also ensure

successful and extended partnership with Akshaya Patra for the Mid-Day Meal Programme.

• At SRF Dahej Site Company will expand in phased manner on and average per year

investment will be Rs. 150 – 300 Crores, considering this cost SRF has started CSR

activities in the area of Dahej.

• In coming year’s expenditure on CSR activities will increase to Rs. 4.75 to Rs. 5.2

Crores per year. This includes Rs. 4.4 Crores towards mead-day meal program and

remaining Rs. 0.8 Crore shall be utilized in on-going activities of education, skill

development, school building infrastructure development, Swachh Vidyalaya, Bus

Facility for kids from villages to Dahej School etc.

• In 2016-17, SRF made an expenditure of Rs. 35 Lakhs on the above mentioned

interventions at Dahej. In addition allocated Rs. 4.40 Crores towards Mid-day meal

program.

• In 2017-18, SRF allocated Rs. 4.75 Crores towards Mid-day meal program and Model

school program.

• In 2018-19, SRF allocated Rs. 5.70 Crores towards Mid-day meal program and Model

school program.

8

Three years, that is, from 2016 to 2019 and the total budget of the initiative is Rs. 12.5

Crores

9

Earmarked Budget for CSR Activity, 2016 – 2026

CSR Funding

Year Description Amount

(INR in Crores)

Akshaya Patra being ready to start construction,

after obtaining land and all requirement

permissions.

4.40 2016-2017

Swachh Vidyalaya (Model Schools) 0.35

Akshaya Patra Mid-day meal program 4.10 2017-2018

Swachh Vidyalaya (Model Schools) 0.65

Akshaya Patra Mid-day meal program 4.00 2018-2019

Swachh Vidyalaya (Model Schools) & Skill

Development

1.70

2019-2020 Education and Infrastructure of Schools, Water

Supply

5.00

2020-2021 Intervention will continue as per the need 5.00






Total INR in Crores 50.20

Note: The above earmarked amount of year 2019 to 2026 will continue as per the need or it

may increase or decrease based on the business and investment. We shall also ensure

compliance of Corporate Social Responsibility Policy Rules.

10

ii. Action taken report on non complied points in the certified compliance report

Ref

No.

Compliance Condition MoEF Comments as per Letter No.

5-118/2008-(ENV)/027 dated

14.01.2016

Compliance Status as on 29.09.2016

EC No. J-11011/1261/2007-IA-II (I) dated May 07, 2008

A. Specific Conditions

3. The Company shall install the

continuous monitoring stations to

monitor all sources of air pollution

including Cl, HF & F. The Monitoring

Report shall be submitted to

Ministry’s Regional Office at Bhopal.

Not Complied

Although PA has claimed that

continuous monitoring being

carried out for HF, Cl, Br and NH3

on monthly basis but analytical

reports as submitted, show AAQ

was being monitored at 3

locations on monthly basis for

PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and SO2. No

efforts have been made to install

continuous monitoring stations as

per the condition.

Shall Comply

Capex Budget of Rs. 1.2 Crore is

under approval from Senior

Management. As of today we have

installed SPM, SO2, NOx, TOC, TSS,

pH. Photos of the same as attached.

Approximate investment done for

the same is Rs. 2.17 Crores, details

attached as Annexure – 1

5. The project authorities shall provide

the chilled brine solution in

secondary condenser for

condensation for the VOCs and

ensure that the solvent recovery shall

not be less than 95%.

Not Complied

Secondary condensers have been

provided with chilled brine

solution at appropriate locations

to enhance the recovery and

reduce loss of solvents. However

details of consumption and

recovery of solvents were not

provided.

Complied

Brine condenser installed and solvent

recovery improved up to 97%.

Solvent consumption and recovery

and losses are attached as Annexure

– 2

9. Fugitive emissions in the work zone

environment, product and raw

material storage area etc shall be

regularly monitored. The emissions

shall conform to the limits imposed

by GPCB.

Not Complied


condition is complied but

monitoring reports for fugitive

emissions were not submitted.

Complied

Fugitive emission in the work zone

environment is carried out regularly

and records maintained in Form-37.

Report is attached as Annexure – 3

13. The project authorities shall develop

greenbelt in 163 ha area of project as

per the guidelines of CPCB to

mitigate the effect of fugitive

emissions.

Not Complied

EC 2008 & 2012 (Condition No.

36): PA has claimed that about 50

acres area has been brought under

greenbelt. However it was

observed that few thousand plants

have been raised within the

premises (Photo 1-2). The

development of greenbelt was

found inadequate as per the

condition.

Complied

Out of 118.17 ha, 35.75 ha is

projected area and 11.80 ha is

developed by green belt which is 33%

of projected area.

Approx. 12000 nos. of trees has been

planted in south and west side of

plant premises. Photographs of

Greenbelt are attached as Annexure

– 4.

B. General Conditions

2 No further expansions or

modifications in the plant shall be

carried out without prior approval of

the Ministry of Environment And

Forests. In case of deviations or

EC 2008 & 2012 (Condition 47):

Not Complied. Expansion or

modification was carried out

without informing MoEF& CC.

Moreover, there was no

Noted and reviewed

11

alterations in the project proposals

from those submitted to this Ministry

for clearance, a fresh reference shall

be made to the Ministry to assess the

adequacy of conditions imposed and

to add additional environmental

protection measures required, if any.

mentioned of 23 by products at

the time granting of EC by MoEF&

CC.

The company shall take following

waste minimization measures:

• Metering of quantities of

active ingredients to

minimize waste.

• Reuse of by-products from

the process as raw materials

or as raw materials

substitutes in other

processes.

• Maximize recoveries

• Use of automated materials

transfer systems to minimize

spillages.

6

• Use of “Closed Feed” systems

into batch reactors.

Not Complied

PA has claimed that “Required

measures taken” but details were

not provided.

Complied

Photographs of Closed feed system /

powder processing system are


We have adopted vaccumised raw

material transfer system for powder

ingredients and closed feeding

system for solvent transferring.

10 The project authorities shall provide

rain water harvesting system and

ground water recharge.

Not Complied

EC 2008 & 2012 (Condition 8):

Rainwater Harvesting system was

not installed.

Complied

The roof-top rain water will transfer

through a network of pipes linked

through storm water drain. The

storm water connected to storm

water collection sump. Rain water

will be transferred from collection

tank to Utility collection tank for

reuse. Photographs attached

Annexure 6.

11 The implementation of the project

vis-a vis environmental action plan

shall be monitored by Ministry’s

Regional Office/SPCB/CPCB/. A six

monthly compliance status report

shall be submitted to monitoring

agencies.

Not Complied

EC 2008 & 2012 (Condition 50):

Project has been monitored by RO,

Bhopal and six monthly

compliance reports have been

submitted for the EC 2008. No

compliance reports were

submitted for EC 2012 till the time

of visit.

Complied

Both Existing EC Compliance statuses

submitted on 31st May 2016. Copy of

Covering Letter attached as

Annexure – 7

Compliance status for EC 2012

submitted on 30th

November, 2015

and 30th

May, 2016. The same shall

be maintained on regular basis.

12 The project proponent shall inform

the public that the project has been

accorded environmental clearance by

the ministry and copies of the

clearance letter are available with the

SPCB and may also be seen at

website of the Ministry at

http://envfor.nic.in

Not Complied

EC 2008 & 2012 (Condition 49): PA

has claimed that condition is

compiled but copies of the

advertisement were not

submitted.

Complied

The condition regarding information

the public about the EC of 2008 and

2012 had published in local

newspaper. Copy of advertise is

attached Annexure – 8

12

13 The project authorities shall inform

the regional office as well as the

Ministry, the date of financial closure

and final approval of the project by

the concerned authorities and the

date of the start of the project.

Not Complied

EC 2008 & 2012 (Condition 52):


condition is complied, but details

were not provided.

Complied

Financial Closure details were

submitted on 11/06/2015 to MoEF

RO, Bhopal. Copy attached as

Annexure – 9

Noted

17 The above conditions shall be

enforced, inter-alia under the

provisions of the Water (Prevention

and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974,

Air (Prevention & Control of

Pollution) Act, 1981, The

Environment(Protection) Act , 1986

,Hazardous Wastes (Management

and Handling ) Rules, 2003 and The

Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991

along with their Amendments and

Rules.

Not Complied. EC 2008 & 2012

(Condition 54): PA has obtained

consent from GPCB which is valid

up to 11.01.2017 for the

production of 14608.4 MTPM

chemicals. The production was

found within the limits. The

monitoring of air and water quality

was also carried out regularly as

per the report submitted and

reports do not show any anomaly.

However, fugitive emissions were

not monitored, the consumption

of coal (Indian + Imported) was

found little higher and details of

usage of coal as per the condition

were not submitted. Generation

and disposal of hazardous waste

was found within the limits as per

EA 2014. It was also noted that no

records were maintained for

generation and disposal of used oil

& discarded containers / barrels

etc. It was observed that

development of green belt was

not found satisfactory. It was

verified from website of the

company that compliance and

analytical reports were not

uploaded. Rainwater harvesting

system was not developed so far.

Copy of the valid PLI was also not

submitted.

Our actual coal consumption for the

year 2014 was 79026 MTA, which

had submitted in EA Report 2014.

Evidence attached as Annexure – 10

Generation and disposal of used oil &

discarded containers / barrels etc.

record is being maintained and same

is submitted in Form 4 to GPCB.

Out of 118.17 ha, 35.75 ha is



of projected area.

Approx. 12000 Nos. of trees has been

planted in South and West side of

plant premises. The same will be

maintained for proposed expansion.

The roof-top rain water will transfer

through a network of pipes linked

through storm water drain. The

storm water connected to storm

water collection sump. Rain water

will be transferred from collection

tank to Utility collection tank for

reuse. Photographs attached

Annexure 6

PLI attached as Annexure 11

EC No. SEIAA/GUJ/EC/8(a)/251/2012 dated 06.09.2012

A. Specific Conditions

A1 Water

1 The fresh water requirement for the

Captive Power Plant shall not exceed

3500 KL/day and it shall be met only

through water supply from the GIDC.

Metering of water shall be done and

its records shall be maintained. No

ground water shall be tapped in any

case for meeting the project

Not Complied

As per audit report average water

consumption was found 3012

KLPD and as per the details

provided by PA the water

withdrawal with GIDC was average

3388 KLPD. It was also noted from

the records, as provided by PA,

Complied

3388 KLD is average water

withdrawal from GIDC from Jul 2015

to Sep 2015.

3012 KLD is average water

consumption from GIDC for the year

2014.From which approx. 1450 KLD

consumed for Captive Power Plant

13

requirements. that 4251 KLPD water was being

consumed. Of this, about 3919

KLPD was used in cooling/

DM/Softener/boiler. This is higher

than the prescribed limit of 3500

KLPD. Moreover, with regard to

captive power plant, there was no

information submitted separately.

Instead wastewater generation

from the captive power plant was

submitted twice.

against prescribed condition 3500

KLD.

4 The wastewater after its primary

treatment shall be further treated in

Ultra-filtration and RO Units. RO

permeate water to the tune of 1112

KL/day shall be reused in process

plant, dust suppression and green

belt development within the

premises whereas RO reject effluent

to the tune of 278 KL/day shall be

discharged into the GIDC

underground drain for its ultimate

disposal in deep sea.

Not Complied


condition “Shall be complied” but

details were not provided. It was

observed during the visit that

power plant was in operation and

coal consumption was increased

from 6280 MTPM to 13606 MTPM.

Complied





8 Imported Coal [600 MT/day] OR

Indian Coal [180 MT/day] + Imported

Coal [420 MT/day] shall be used as

fuel in the AFBC Boilers [35 TPH x 2

no. & 60 TPH x 1 no.]. HSD to the

tune of 25 KL/day maximum may also

be used as a fuel intermittently.

Not Complied

Details were not provided as per

the condition. However, it was

noted from the records that and

coal consumption was increased

from 6280 MTPM to 13606 MTPM.

Complied





The fugitive emission in the work

zone environment shall be

monitored. The emission shall

conform to the standards prescribed

by the concerned authorities from

time to time (e.g. Directors of

Industrial Safety & Health). Following

indicative guidelines shall also be

followed to reduce the fugitive

emission.

Not Complied

Fugitive emissions were not

monitored. However, following

have been submitted

Complied

Fugitive emission in the work zone

environment is carried out regularly

and records maintained in Form-37.

Report is attached as Annexure – 3

� All handling & transport of

coal shall be exercised through

covered coal conveyors only.

Complied Complied

Closed Conveyor of coal transport is

provided

� Enclosure shall be provided

at coal loading and unloading

operations.

Complied Complied

Coal loading and unloading is done in

closed shed

14

� Water shall be sprinkled on

coal stock piles periodically to retain

some moisture in top layer and also

while compacting to reduce the

fugitive emission.

Complied Complied

Regular water sprinkling on coal

stock pile is done

14

� All transfer points shall be

fully enclosed.

Complied Complied

Closed Conveyor of coal transport is

provided

� Adequate dust

suppression/extraction system at

crusher house as well as for the coal

stock yard shall be provided to abate

dust nuisance

Complied Complied

Dust Collectors are installed to abate

the nuisance of dust in power plant

� Accumulated dust on the

ground and other surfaces shall be

removed / swept regularly and water

the area after sweeping.

Complied Complied

House keeping is maintained

regularly in power plant

� Internal roads shall be either

concreted or asphalted or paved

properly to reduce the fugitive

emission during vehicular

movement.

Complied Complied

� Air borne coal dust shall be

controlled with water sprinklers at

suitable locations in the plant.

Complied Complied

For controlling air borne dust, water

sprinkling on regular basis on coal

stock pile and fly ash is stored in silo

� Coal shall be transported

through covered trucks only whereas

fly ash shall be transported through

enclosed containers only.

Complied Complied

Both coal and fly ash are transported

in closed vehicle only

� A green belt shall be

developed all around the plant

boundary and also along the roads to

mitigate fugitive & transport dust

emission.

Not Complied Complied

Photographs of Green belt are


15 Third party performance evaluation

of the air pollution control systems

including ESP shall be carried out at

least once in a year to check its

performance and efficiency through a

reputed institute / organization like

NPC, L.D. College of Engineering -

Ahmedabad or such other institutes

of similar repute, and its records shall

be maintained.

Not Complied

Adequate certificate from

environmental auditors i.e. M/s.

Nirma University was submitted

which was included as part of

Environmental Audit 2014.

Performance evolution was not

carried out for APC including ESPs

as per the condition.

Complied

ESP performance evaluation work

done by GPCB approved Schedule – I

auditor Shree Tapi

Bhramcharyashram Sabha College of

Diploma Engineering, Report is


Shall be submitted before end of

October 2016.

18 The used oil shall be sold to only to

the registered recyclers / rerefiners.

Not Complied


condition is compiled but details

of generation and disposal were

not submitted.

Complied

Generation and disposal of used oil

record is marinated and submitted to

GPCB in Form 4 regularly. Copy of

Form-4 submitted is attached as

Annexure – 14

19 The discarded containers / barrels /

bags / liners shall be sold only to the

registered recycler after

decontamination.

Not Complied


condition is compiled but details

of generation and disposal were

not submitted.

Complied

Generation and disposal of discarded

containers / barrels / bags / liners

record is marinated and submitted to

GPCB in Form 4. Copy of Form-4

15

submitted is attached as Annexure –

14

31 The unit shall develop green belt in at

least 3,88,646.67 m2 [33% of the

total plot area] within the premises.

Green belt shall comprise of rows of

varying height tall native trees with

thick foliage in the periphery of the

factory premises.

Not Complied

Plantation was not undertaken by

the PA. No details were provided

on the activity.

Complied

Out of 118.17 ha, 35.75 ha is



of projected area.

Approx. 12000 Nos. of trees has been

planted in South and West side of

plant premises. The same will be

maintained for proposed expansion.

Photographs of Greenbelt are


36 The company shall carry out socio-

economic developmental /

community welfare activities in

consultation with the District

Development Officer / District

Collector.

Not Complied

No activity on socio economic

development was started yet.

Complied

CSR activities attached as Annexure –

15

16

Annexure – 1

17

18

19

20

21

Annexure – 2

22

Annexure – 3

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

Annexure – 4

31

32

33

Annexure – 5

34

35

Annexure – 6

Rain Water Harvesting System

The roof-top rain water will transfer through a network of pipes linked through storm water

drain. The storm water connected to storm water collection sump. Rain water will be

transferred from collection tank to Utility collection tank for reuse.

36

Annexure – 7

37

38

Annexure – 8

39

40

41

42

Annexure – 9

43

44

Annexure – 10

45

Annexure – 11

46

Annexure – 12

47

48

49

50

Annexure – 13

51

52

53

54

Inauguration of IBM Kidsmart Centre by the Disctrict Collector- Bharuch

(2014-15 & 2015-16) IBM Kidsmart Centres at Dahej

Annexure – 14

SRF Limited, Dahej Site CSR Activities

CSR at Dahej

Background

SRF is committed to sustainable development and inclusive growth of its various stakeholders

including the society within which it operates. In line with this philosophy, the Business is

undertaking various socio, economic and environmental development programs to improve the

quality of life of rural poor in the area where it operates.

Its CSR initiatives are mainly focused upon the cause of primary education, community health,

sustainable livelihood development and environment conservation. Near its Bhiwadi (Rajasthan)

operations, we support a watershed-based poverty alleviation program in 42 villages which has

positively impacted over 6700 poor families for their sustainable livelihood. This project is aimed at

enhancing livelihood options for the rural poor by harnessing underutilized land and water resources

adopting a watershed based approach. This project has been widely acclaimed and acknowledged as

a classical example of a successful Corporate- NGO- Community partnership both at national and

international forums

CSR at Dahej

The Business initiated its CSR interventions in 2013-14 near its factory establishment at Dahej under

the Public-Private Partnership Model (PPP) with focus on primary education, community

infrastructure development and sanitation. Our Primary Education initiatives are aimed at improving

the quality of education in rural govt. schools, with focus on girl child education. Activities that lead

to such developments include improvement of school infrastructure, appointment of para teachers

and remedial classes for academically weak children, provision of computer aided learning facilities,

capacity building of teachers and the community etc.

The highlights of the CSR interventions at Dahej are as follows:

Education Initiatives

Establishment and operation of 11 IBM Kid smart Centres:

SRF in partnership with IBM and District Administration Bharuch has established Kid smart Early

Learning centres under PPP model in the 11 Govt. primary schools with the objective to offer

children from low socio-economic status communities’ good quality teaching-learning opportunities

with the use of technology. These benefits over 2000 school children. The centre is a model in itself

in terms of child friendly environment and its unique learning module.

55

The first 6 centres were established in 2014-15 while another 5 centres were established in 2015-16

as part of the programme expansion under the PPP mode and the district administration- Bharuch

has also contributed a total of Rs.16 lac for the infrastructure development required for the

establishment of these centres, while the equipment and running cost have been provided by SRF.

SRF has appointed 11Vidya Volunteers (computer teachers) in these schools to facilitate teaching-

learning besides an overall coordination with partners for its successful operations and maintenance.

Currently the Kid-smart Centres are running in the following schools with presence in 4 blocks in

Bharuch district:

1. Govt. Primary School, Suva, Block Vagra

2. Govt. Primary School, Jolva, Block Vagra

3. Govt. Primary School (Girls),Dahej, Block Vagra

4. Govt. Primary School (Girls),, Lakhigam, Dahej, Block Vagra

5. Govt. Primary School (Girls),, Luvara, Dahej, Block Vagra

6. Govt. Primary School, Bhadbhut, Block Bharuch

7. Govt. Primary School (Girls), Bharuch, Block Bharuch

8. Govt. Primary School, Sudi, Block Amod

9. Govt. Primary School, Samani, Block Amod

10. Govt. Primary School (Boys), Jagaria, Block Jagaria

11. Govt. Primary School, Dumala Boidra, Block Jagaria

School infrastructure Development:

Improvement of physical infrastructure development and beautification of school premise are also

one of the focus area under our primary education program and this is done in consultation with the

school authorities, SMC and the Village Panchayats. In 2015-16, the integrated school infrastructure

development works were undertaken at 2 Govt. Primary Schools i.e., Suva and Jolva. As part to

develop these schools as model schools, renovation and painting of the school building have been

done along with the development of the school grounds with garden, installation of swings and play

equipment for children, renovation of toilet and drinking water facility etc.

56

Appointment of para Teachers and training Govt. Teachers:

In addition to the 11 Computer Teachers, SRF has

appointed 3 Para teachers also in the Govt. school Suva

and Jolva to support the regular teaching activity in the

supported schools. Academic teachers’ training for all

(Govt. teachers, Vidya Volunteers and Para teachers) is

also organized periodically to improve the overall quality

of education in the schools. During 2015-16, 3 teachers’

training programs were organized covering all the 11

supported schools.

School bus for girls at Dahej:

Non-availability of the high schools in village Suva and Jolva leads to the

drop-out of many girl students after the primary education. To deal with

this issue, since 2013-14, a bus facility has been provided for school

children, especially girls, to commute from Suva &Jolva village to Dahej

high school, 12 kms away. This has improved the regularity and retention

of girls in the high schools as compared to the previous years. This facility

will continue, on need basis, in the years to come.

Community Infrastructure Development and Sanitation Initiatives

Development of Community Garden at Jolva Village:

As part of the community/ village infrastructure development

plan, SRF Dahej has developed a community park at Jolva village

near the factory. The park has been facilitated with the

development of a garden, plantation of trees and play

equipment for children. The park was inaugurated by the

District Development Officer (DDO) on 14th

August during a big

gathering of the community people.

Contribution for Swachh Bharat Abhiyan:

SRF in partnership with District Rural Development Agency (DRDA-

Bharuch) had planned for the construction of household toilets for

BPL families in village Suva and Jolva to make these village open

defection free. This need was identified in consultation with the DRDA

under PPP mode in the presence of Dist Collector Bharuch. In 2014-15,

SRF had contributed Rs.5 lac to “Mukhyamantri Shri Swachchhata

Nidhi Bharuch District".

57

CSR Budget and Future Plans

During 2015-16, SRF made an expenditure of Rs 25 lac on the above mentioned interventions at

Dahej. This includes Rs.19 lac for education project and Rs.6 lac for community infrastructure

development.

As SRF stands committed to continue its CSR interventions at Dahej, for the year 2015-16, Rs 35 lac

have been budgeted for the various social interventions at Dahej with focus on education,

community infrastructure and vocational training for the inclusive growth of the local communities.

In addition, SRF has also decided to set-up a centralized kitchen at Bharuch in partnership with

Akshya Patra Foundation (NGO) and the District Administration to support the mid-day meal

program in the Govt. primary schools at Bharuch and Vagra block with a total capital expenditure of

Rs 8 Crore, out of which the budgetary provision of Rs 4 Crore has been kept for 2016-17.

58

iii. Details of baseline data collected and GLC

DETAILS OF MONITORING LOCATIONS

SR.

NO.

NAME OF VILLAGE BEARING

W.R.T.

PROJECT

SITE

APPROXIMATE RADIAL

DISTANCE FROM PROJECT

SITE (KM)

1 Project-site --- ---

2 Jolva E 1.7

3 Suva SE 2.6

4 Vav NE 3.9

5 Dahej W 5.1

6 Vadadla N 1.7

7 Ambetha SW 4.9

8 Luvara SW 9.2

9 Galenda NE 4.8

10 Jageshwar Jetty SW 7.4

11 Vav Pond NE 3.9

12 Vadadla Pond N 1.7

59

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STATUS (DECEMBER, 2014 to FEBRUARY, 2015) Unit: µg/m3

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING

PM10 PM2.5 Station

No.

Sampling

Location Max. Min. 98% Max Min 98%

1 Project Site 96.74 83.7 96.32 37.3 31.8 37.05

2 Vadadla 78.26 69.2 78.26 29.04 24.41 29.01

3 Jolva 93.98 82.61 93.91 36.10 31.39 35.82

4 Suva 69.75 77.72 77.75 31.09 24.41 30.86

5 Ambhetha 98.87 87.32 98.64 37.59 31.43 37.56

6. Dahej 78.62 68.48 77.95 29.3 24.09 28.87

SO2 NOx CO Station

No.

Sampling

Location Max Min 98% Max. Min 98% Max. Min 98%

1 Project Site 17.09 11.13 17.01 27.16 15.86 27.12 0.22 0.17 0.21

2 Vadadla 15.36 8.61 15.30 24.55 11.11 24.49 0.20 0.15 0.19

3 Jolva 16.07 10.4 16.00 25.82 12.18 24.81 0.20 0.16 0.19

4 Suva 15.28 8.72 15.12 24.27 10.83 24.21 0.20 0.15 0.19

5 Ambhetha 16.09 10.16 16.00 26.77 15.46 26.71 0.19 0.14 0.18

6. Dahej 15.78 9.34 15.73 26.72 15.22 26.71 0.23 0.16 0.21

60

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STATUS (FEBRUARY, 2016 to MARCH, 2016) Unit: µg/m3

Location- (Project Site)

Location : AAQM-1

(Project Site)

Period :

February - 2016 to March - 2016 Instrument - RDS APM 460 BL & FPS APM 550 MINI

Parameter with Results Date Of

Monitoring PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx HCl Cl2 Br2 HC

ppm NH3 HF

VOC

ppm

CO

mg/m3

2/15/2016 94 34 15.4 23.2 BDL BDL BDL 0.08 BDL BDL 0.05 0.25








Max. 96 38 17.6 28.3 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0.08 0.25

Min. 85 26 11.6 20.8 0 0 0 0.02 0 0 0.02 0.10

NOTE:

1. Ambient Air Monitoring carried out during dry day.

2. BDL : Below Minimum Detectable Limits

61


Location- (Vadadla Village)

Location : AAQM-2

(Vadadla Village)

Period :



Monitoring PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 HCl Cl2 Br2 HC

ppm NH3 HF

VOC

ppm

CO

mg/m3

2/15/2016 80 21 11.3 16.8 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL








Max. 86 27 13.4 22.3 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00

Min. 63 17 9.5 15.5 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00

NOTE:



62


Location- (Jolva Village)

Location : AAQM-3

(Jolva Village)

Period :




ppm NH3 HF

VOC

ppm

CO

mg/m3


2/18/2016 86 20 11.6 16.1 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.05







Max. 93 32 14.8 21.6 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.06

Min. 77 20 10.3 15.3 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.04

NOTE: 1. Ambient Air Monitoring carried out during dry day. 2. BDL : Below Minimum Detectable Limits

63


Location- (Suva Village)

Location : AAQM-4

(Suva Village)

Period :




ppm NH3 HF

VOC

ppm

CO

mg/m3









Max. 81 24 13.5 22.5 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00

Min. 59 15 9.7 15.8 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00

NOTE:



64


Location- (Ambhetha Village)

Location : AAQM-5

(Ambhetha Village)

Period :




ppm NH3 HF

VOC

ppm

CO

mg/m3









Max. 82 27 13.1 22.6 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00

Min. 68 19 9.5 16.3 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00

NOTE:



65


Location- (Dahej Village)

Location : AAQM-6

(Dahej Village)

Period :




ppm NH3 HF

VOC

ppm

CO

mg/m3

2/16/2016 90 34 14.5 21.5 BDL BDL BDL 0.05 BDL BDL BDL 0.06


2/23/2016 93 35 13.9 21.5 BDL BDL BDL 0.05 BDL BDL BDL BDL



3/4/2016 81 28 13.4 20.8 BDL BDL BDL 0.08 BDL BDL BDL BDL



Max. 95 36 15.1 24.5 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0.00 0.06

Min. 81 28 12.7 18.6 0 0 0 0.05 0 0 0.00 0.02

NOTE:



66

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STATUS (February, 2017) Unit: µg/m3

SPM PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx O3 SR.

NO.

SAMPLING

LOCATION AVERAGE

1 Project-site (A1) 124.1 83.16 46.04 16.72 18.42 10.68

2 Jolva (A2) 114.9 75.12 44.62 14.93 16.86 10.65

3 Suva (A3) 118.0 76.05 42.99 16.24 18.24 10.08

4 Vav (A4) 116.0 77.05 41.99 16.06 17.69 10.15

5 Dahej (A5) 113.8 73.42 41.62 17.29 18.36 10.18

6 Vadadla (A6) 112.9 72.67 45.99 11.97 14.06 10.25

7 Ambetha (A7) 116.7 75.32 44.66 12.41 14.08 10.02

8 Luvara (A8) 114.6 73.65 43.16 13.48 15.39 10.08

9 Galenda (A9) 115.9 72.53 42.32 13.27 15.06 10.09

Limit 500 100 60 80 80 100


Pb NH3 CO

(mg/m3)

C6H6 BaP

(ng/m3)

As

(ng/m3)

Ni

(ng/m3)

SR.

NO.

SAMPLING

LOCATION

AVERAGE

1 Project-site (A1) 0.65 6.08 1.28 BDL BDL BDL 10.15

2 Jolva (A2) BDL 1.58 1.16 BDL BDL BDL 10.08

3 Suva (A3) BDL BDL 1.15 BDL BDL BDL 10.05

4 Vav (A4) BDL BDL 1.15 BDL BDL BDL 10.12

5 Dahej (A5) BDL 1.75 1.18 BDL BDL BDL 10.08

6 Vadadla (A6) BDL 1.71 1.16 BDL BDL BDL 10.06

7 Ambetha (A7) BDL BDL 1.15 BDL BDL BDL 10.05

8 Luvara (A8) BDL 1.37 1.15 BDL BDL BDL 10.06

9 Galenda (A9) BDL BDL 1.16 BDL BDL BDL 10.08

Limit 1 400 4 5 1 6 20

Note: BDL – Below Detectable Limit

67


HCl Cl2 Br2 HF HC

(ppm)

VOCs (Isobutylene Equivalent)

(ppm)

SR.

NO.

SAMPLING

LOCATION

AVERAGE

1 Project-site (A1) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.8

2 Jolva (A2) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.2

3 Suva (A3) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.3

4 Vav (A4) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.7

5 Dahej (A5) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.6

6 Vadadla (A6) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.2

7 Ambetha (A7) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.3

8 Luvara (A8) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.4

9 Galenda (A9) <1.0 <5.0 BDL <1.25 BDL 0.3

Note: BDL – Below Detectable Limit

Note:

PARAMETER TEST METHOD

Particulate Matter (PM10) IS 5182 (PART 23):2006 (Cyclonic Flow Technique) Gravimetric

Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Gravimetric

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) IS 5182 (PART-2):2001

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) IS 5182 (PART-6):2006

Ozone (O3) IS 5182 (PART-9) :1974 **

Lead (Pb) AAS APHA 3030 E

Ammonia (NH3) Indophenol Blue Method *Carbon Monoxide (CO) Digital CO Analyzer

**Benzene (C6H6) Adsorption extraction followed by GC/GCMS

**Benzo (α) Pyrene (BaP) Solvent extraction followed by GC/GCMS

**Arsenic (As) AAS APHA 3114 B- C

**Nickel (Ni) AAS APHA 3030 E

**Hydro Carbon (HC) Digital Gas Analyzer

Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S)

IS 5182 (PART-7):1973 *Hydrochloric Acid(HCl) Titrametric Method

Chlorine (CL2) IS:5182:(PART-19):1982 *Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) IS:5182:(PART-13):1991

Carbon Disulphide (CS2) IS:5182:(PART-20):1982

VOC – Aeroqual Series 300 (Sensor 0 – 25 ppm)

Minimum Detectable Limit – 0.1 ppm

Minimum Detection Limit: **

Lead (as Pb) : 0.5 µg/m3

**Benzo (α) Pyrene (BaP) : 0.5 ng/m

3 **Hydrocarbon

(HC)

: 1 ppm

Ammonia (NH3) : 1 µg/m3

**Arsenic (as As) : 2 ng/m

3 *Carbon

Monoxide (as CO)

: 1.14 mg/m3

Benzene (as C6H6) : 2 µg/m3

**Nickel (as Ni) : 10 ng/m

3

*Not in our NABL Scope,

**Analysed by Sub Contractor (Not in our NABL Scope)

68

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STATUS - MINIMUM, MAXIMUM, 98TH

PERCENTILE VALUE &

AVERAGE (24 HRS.)

(FEBRUARY’2017) Unit: µg/m3

SR.

NO.

SAMPLING

LOCATION

PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOx O3

1 Project-site (A1)

Arithmetic Mean 84 48 17 19 10.5

Min – Max 79-86 36-49 10-19 11-22 9-14

98th

Percentile 86 49 18.54 22 13.54

2 Jolva (A2)

Arithmetic Mean 75 44.5 14.5 17 11

Min – Max 70-78 41-49 12-19 12-19 8-13

98th

Percentile 78 49 19 19 13

3 Suva (A3)

Arithmetic Mean 76 42.5 17 19 9.5

Min – Max 73-80 41-46 10-19 12-22 7-14

98th

Percentile 80 45.54 19 22 14

4 Vav (A4)

Arithmetic Mean 77 43 17 18 10

Min – Max 72-83 30-46 9-19 12-22 8-14

98th

Percentile 82.54 46 19 21.54 13.54

5 Dahej (A5)


Min – Max 70-78 30-46 12-19 11-22 7-14

98th

Percentile 78 46 19 22 13.54

6 Vadadla (A6)

Arithmetic Mean 72 46.5 12 14 10

Min – Max 71-81 42-49 9-15 9-16 8-14

98th

Percentile 78.24 49 15 16 13.54

7 Ambetha (A7)

Arithmetic Mean 75.5 44.5 12 14 10

Min – Max 70-78 41-49 9-15 9-16 7-13

98th

Percentile 78 49 15 16 13

8 Luvara (A8)

Arithmetic Mean 73.5 43.5 12 15.5 11

Min – Max 70-78 41-46 11-19 12-19 7-15

98th

Percentile 78 45.54 18.54 18.54 14.08

9 Galenda (A9)


Min – Max 71-81 41-46 11-19 12-19 8-14

98th

Percentile 77.78 45.54 18.54 18.54 13.54

Limit 100 60 80 80 100

69

BACKGROUND NOISE LEVELS (DECEMBER, 2014 to FEBRUARY, 2015)

NOISE LEVEL dB Leq (A)

Sr. No. Sampling Locations Day Time

(6:00 am to 10:00 pm)

Night Time

(10:00 pm to 6:00 am)

1 Project Site 58.5 48.5

2 Vadadla 53.6 42.2

3 Jolva 58.2 48.4

4 Suva 53.2 43.2

5 Ambetha 53.9 43.6

6 Dahej 52.4 42.0

BACKGROUND NOISE LEVELS (FEBRUARY, 2017)

SR.

NO.

LOCATION NOISE LEVEL IN

dB(A)

TIME

1 Project-site (N1) 50-52

41-45

Day

Night

2 Jolva (N2) 52–55

44–45

Day

Night

3 Suva (N3) 49-51

42-43

Day

Night

4 Vav (N4) 48-49

41-43

Day

Night

5 Dahej (N5) 51-54

43-45

Day

Night

6 Vadadla (N6) 50-53

42-44

Day

Night

7 Ambetha (N7) 51-54

42-44

Day

Night

8 Luvara (N8) 49-53

42-45

Day

Night

9 Galenda (N9) 50-53

42-44

Day

Night

70

NOISE LEVELS DUE TO TRANSPORTATION

SR.

NO.

SAMPLING LOCATION

NOISE LEVEL IN dB(A) TIME

1. N1(T): Near Jolva By Pass Road 57-63

51-54

Day

Night

2. N2 (T): Near Dahej SEZ 61-65

52-54

Day

Night

3. N3 (T): Near Kadodara By Pass

Road

56-63

50-54

Day

Night

INDUSTRIAL NOISE LEVELS

SR.

NO.

SAMPLING LOCATION

NOISE LEVEL IN dB(A) TIME

1. Nr. Hemani Intermediates Pvt. Ltd. 66-71

64-68

Day

Night

2. Nr. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemical Ltd. 68-74

64-68

Day

Night

3. Nr. NOCIL Ltd. 68-74

63-69

Day

Night

4. Nr. Luna Chemical Industries (P) Ltd. 69-73

65-68

Day

Night

5. Nr. Meghmani Finechem Ltd. 68-73

62-66

Day

Night

71

WATER QUALITY (DECEMBER, 2014 to FEBRUARY, 2015)

SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS

Sr. No. Parameters Unit Jolva Ambhetha Suva Vadadla Project Site

1. pH (at 25°C) -- 8.63 8.05 8.1 8.12 8.53

2. Colour Hazen Unit BDL (DL 5.0 Hazen) BDL (DL 5.0 Hazen) BDL (DL 5.0 Hazen) BDL (DL 5.0Hazen) BDL (DL 5.0Hazen)

3. Turbidity NTU 4.3 8.0 9.2 6.8 4

4. Odour -- Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

5. Taste -- Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

6. Conductivity µS/cm 632 247 921 572 1249

7. Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/l 168 164 148 148 156

8. Calcium as Ca mg/l 35.2 40 33.6 25.6 24

9. Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/l 184 156 196 112 340

10. Chloride as Cl mg/l 173.61 110.92 274.37 169.79 245.95

11. Residual free chlorine mg/l BDL (DL 0.20mg/l) BDL (DL 0.20mg/l) BDL (DL 0.20mg/l) BDL (DL 0.20mg/l) BDL (DL 0.20mg/l)

12. Cyanide as CN mg/l BDL (DL 0.02mg/l) BDL (DL 0.02mg/l) BDL (DL 0.02mg/l) BDL (DL 0.02mg/l) BDL (DL 0.02mg/l)

13. Magnesium as Mg mg/l 19.45 15.56 15.56 20.42 23.34

14. Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 424 374 630 384 764

15. Total Suspended Solids mg/L 32 40 64 44 46

16. Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 53.33 60.54 41.61 56.24 126.88

17. Fluoride as F mg/l 0.93 0.45 0.51 0.79 1.23

18. Nitrate as NO3-N mg/l 9.64 10.2 6.37 4.12 10.92

19. Iron as Fe mg/l 0.25 0.18 0.11 0.22 0.15

20. Aluminium as Al mg/l BDL (DL 0.03mg/l) BDL (DL 0.03mg/l) BDL (DL 0.03mg/l) BDL (DL 0.03mg/l) BDL (DL 0.03mg/l)

21. Boron mg/l 0.92 0.29 0.83 1.86 0.99

22. Phenolic Compounds mg/l BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l)

23. Zinc as Zn mg/l BDL 0.03 BDL 0.02 BDL

24. Phosphate mg/l 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.21 0.23

25. Copper as Cu mg/l BDL (DL 0.02mg/l) BDL (DL 0.02mg/l) BDL (DL 0.02mg/l) BDL (DL 0.02mg/l) BDL (DL 0.02mg/l)

26. Hexa Chromium mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

27. Manganese as Mn mg/l BDL (DL 0.10mg/l) BDL (DL 0.10mg/l) BDL (DL 0.10mg/l) BDL (DL 0.10mg/l) 0.20

28. Cadmium as Cd mg/l BDL (DL 0.003mg/l) BDL (DL 0.003mg/l) BDL (DL 0.003mg/l) BDL (DL 0.003mg/l) BDL (DL 0.003mg/l)

29. Lead as Pb mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

72

30. Selenium as Se mg/l BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l)

31. Arsenic as As mg/l BDL (DL 0.01mg/l) BDL (DL 0.01mg/l) BDL (DL 0.01mg/l) BDL (DL 0.01mg/l) BDL (DL 0.01mg/l)

32. Mercury as Hg mg/l BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l) BDL (DL 0.001mg/l)

33. Sodium as Na mg/l 31 62 46 41 38

34. Potassium as K mg/l 4 15 12 8 7

35. Nickel mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

36. Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/l 130 90 70 70 70

37. Biochemical Oxygen Demand mg/l 43.8 29.2 21.9 22.7 23.6

73

GROUND WATER ANALYSIS

Limits of IS : 10500-2012

Sr.

No. Parameters Unit Jolva Ambhetha Suva Vadadla Dahej Desirable

Limit (Max)

Permissible Limits in

the Absence of

Alternate Source (Max)

1. pH (at 25°C) -- 7.85 7.95 8.15 8.25 8.42 6.5 to 8.5 No Relaxation

2. Colour Hazen

Unit

BDL (DL 5.0

Hazen)

BDL (DL 5.0

Hazen)

BDL (DL 5.0

Hazen)

BDL (DL

5.0Hazen)

BDL (DL

5.0Hazen) 5 15

3. Turbidity NTU 3.5 0 4 3.8 0 1 5

4. Odour -- Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

5. Taste -- Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

6. Total Hardness as

CaCO3 mg/l 464 180 484 520 588 200 600

7. Conductivity mS/cm 1.8 1.2 1.7 2.2 3.1

8. Calcium Hardness

as CaCO3 mg/l 208 128 204 288 408 187.5 200

9. Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/l 244 144 224 316 512 200 600

10. Chloride as Cl mg/l 516.01 130.21 506.37 622.11 795.72 250 1000

11. Residual free

chlorine mg/l

BDL (DL

0.20mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.20mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.20mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.20mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.20mg/l) 0.2 1.0

12. Phosphate mg/l 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.2 0.14

13. Cyanide as CN mg/l BDL (DL

0.02mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.02mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.02mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.02mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.02mg/l) 0.05 No Relaxation

14. Magnesium

Hardness as CaCO3 mg/l 256 52 280 232 180 123.41 100

15. Total Dissolved

Solids mg/l 1294 682 1172 1434 1752 500 2000

16. Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 104.3 54.62 83.12 136.56 293.55 200 400

17. Fluoride as F mg/l 0.98 0.84 0.82 0.79 0.82 1.0 1.5

18. Nitrate as NO3-N mg/l 5.36 8.13 2.79 4.68 9.66 45 No Relaxation

74

Limits of IS : 10500-2012

Sr.

No. Parameters Unit Jolva Ambhetha Suva Vadadla Dahej Desirable

Limit (Max)

Permissible Limits in

the Absence of

Alternate Source (Max)

19. Iron as Fe mg/l 0.23 0.17 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.3 No Relaxation

20. Aluminium as Al mg/l BDL (DL

0.03mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.03mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.03mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.03mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.03mg/l) 0.03 0.2

21. Boron mg/l 0.95 0.34 0.95 0.57 0.91 0.50 1.0

22. Phenolic

Compounds mg/l

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l) 0.001 0.002

23. Zinc as Zn mg/l BDL 0.04 0.02 BDL 0.05 5 15

24. Copper as Cu mg/l BDL (DL

0.02mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.02mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.02mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.02mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.02mg/l) 0.05 1.5

25. Manganese as Mn mg/l BDL (DL

0.10mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.10mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.10mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.10mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.10mg/l) 0.1 0.3

26. Cadmium as Cd mg/l BDL (DL

0.003mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.003mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.003mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.003mg/l)

BDL (DL


27. Lead as Pb mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.01 No Relaxation

28. Selenium as Se mg/l BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL


29. Arsenic as As mg/l BDL (DL

0.01mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.01mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.01mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.01mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.01mg/l) 0.01 0.05

30. Mercury as Hg mg/l BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL

0.001mg/l)

BDL (DL


31. Nickel as Ni mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

32. Sodium as Na mg/l 42 49 16 17 63 -- --

33. Potassium as K mg/l 1 3 2 2 21 -- --

75

WATER QUALITY- PHYSICAL PARAMETERS (FEBRUARY, 2017)

SR.

NO.

SAMPLING

LOCATION

pH TEMPERATURE

(0C)

TURBIDITY

(NTU)

T.D.S.

(mg/L)

T.S.S.

(mg/L)

1 Project-site (GIDC Water) 7.49 24.9 0.3 384 18

2 Jolva (GW1) 7.68 25.1 0.2 424 8

3 Suva (GW2) 7.52 24.9 0.2 416 14

4 Vav (GW3) 8.27 25 0.3 384 14

5 Dahej (GW4) 8.09 25.1 0.1 436 16

6 Vadadla (GW5) 7.88 25 0.2 406 12

7 Ambetha (GW6) 7.09 25.1 0.3 398 14

8 Luvara (GW7) 7.88 25.2 0.5 342 46

9 Galenda (GW8) 7.31 25.1 0.2 372 6

10 Jageshwar Jetty (SW1) 8.06 25.2 64.4 24995 278

11 Vav Pond (SW2) 7.92 24.9 0.2 599 48

12 Vadadla Pond (SW3) 7.47 25 0.4 430 14

GW= Ground water, SW= Surface water

WATER QUALITY - NUTRIENTS, OXYGEN DEMAND AND ORGANIC PARAMETERS

AMMONICAL

NITROGEN

DO COD BOD327

OIL &

GREASE

SR.

NO.

SAMPLING LOCATION

(mg/L)

1 Project-site (GIDC Water) <0.2 7.52 7.38 <1.0 <0.4

2 Jolva (GW1) <0.2 6.38 9.28 <1.0 <0.4

3 Suva (GW2) <0.2 7.36 <0.6 <1.0 <0.4

4 Vav (GW3) <0.2 7 5.76 <1.0 <0.4

5 Dahej (GW4) <0.2 6.44 8.54 <1.0 <0.4

6 Vadadla (GW5) <0.2 6.44 8.52 <1.0 <0.4

7 Ambetha (GW6) <0.2 6.06 8.26 <1.0 <0.4

8 Luvara (GW7) <0.2 6.44 9.76 <1.0 <0.4

9 Galenda (GW8) <0.2 6.28 2.06 <1.0 <0.4

10 Jageshwar Jetty (SW1) <0.2 6.92 46.9 4.8 <0.4

11 Vav Pond (SW2) <0.2 6.06 14.16 <1.0 <0.4

12 Vadadla Pond (SW3) <0.2 5.64 39.04 2.42 <0.4


76

WATER QUALITY - INORGANIC PARAMETERS


T.H. =Total Hardness, C.H. =Calcium Hardness, BDL= Below Detectable Limit

WATER QUALITY - HEAVY METALS

Na T-Cr+3

Cu Pb Fe Zn K Cd F-

SR.

NO.

SAMPLING LOCATION

(mg / L)

1 Project-site (GIDC

Water)

26.45 <0.005 BDL 0.01 2.88 0.090 1.5 <0.001 BDL

2 Jolva (GW1) 12.88 <0.005 BDL 0.009 1.17 <0.022 1.4 <0.001 BDL

3 Suva (GW2) 15.76 <0.005 BDL 0.009 1.14 <0.022 1.2 <0.001 BDL

4 Vav (GW3) 22.51 <0.005 BDL <0.005 1.46 <0.022 1.9 <0.001 BDL

5 Dahej (GW4) 17.91 <0.005 BDL 0.015 2.49 0.086 1.8 <0.001 BDL

6 Vadadla (GW5) 14.52 <0.005 BDL <0.005 0.13 <0.022 1.7 <0.001 BDL

7 Ambetha (GW6) 12.24 <0.005 BDL 0.008 0.18 <0.022 7.8 <0.001 BDL

8 Luvara (GW7) 11.8 <0.005 BDL 0.009 0.23 0.082 1.9 <0.001 BDL

9 Galenda (GW8) 38.3 <0.005 BDL 0.006 0.44 <0.022 17.2 <0.001 BDL

10 Jageshwar Jetty (SW1) 26.50 <0.005 BDL <0.005 1.61 0.044 152 <0.001 BDL

11 Vav Pond (SW2) 28.80 <0.005 BDL <0.005 BDL <0.022 1.3 <0.001 BDL

12 Vadadla Pond (SW3) 57.60 <0.005 BDL <0.005 3.47 <0.022 6.3 <0.001 BDL

Minimum Detection Limit: **

Total Chromium (as Cr+3

) : 0.005 mg/L Total Iron (as Fe) : 0.01 mg/L

Copper (as Cu) : 0.05 mg/L **

Zinc (as Zn) : 0.022 mg/L **

Lead (as Pb) : 0.005 mg/L *Not in our NABL Scope,

**Analyzed by Sub Contractor (Not in our NABL Scope)

TOTAL

ALKALINITY

(AS CACO3)

T.H.

(AS

CACO3)

C.H.

(AS

CACO3)

Cl-

SO4—2

Mg SR.

NO.

SAMPLING LOCATION

(mg/L)

1 Project-site (GIDC Water) 162.4 149.6 67.42 72.18 39.62 19.96

2 Jolva (GW1) 118.8 153.2 100.5 126.99 12.16 12.81

3 Suva (GW2) 130.2 118 50 104.98 23.49 16.52

4 Vav (GW3) 123.8 165.3 92.73 68.57 21.49 17.63

5 Dahej (GW4) 199.4 135.1 80.64 110.84 25.56 13.22

6 Vadadla (GW5) 113.9 133.1 76.64 99.95 47.1 13.72

7 Ambetha (GW6) 84.16 171.4 86.68 66.32 9.75 20.57

8 Luvara (GW7) 89.46 133 88.70 144.6 9.62 10.77

9 Galenda (GW8) 98.18 167.3 94.75 73.91 16.84 17.63

10 Jageshwar Jetty (SW1) 225.4 5327.4 1068.3 16356.7 1823.1 1034.96

11 Vav Pond (SW2) 225 106.4 30.12 287.8 21.39 18.54

12 Vadadla Pond (SW3) 138.6 116.9 76.62 38.43 15.64 9.79

77

PHYSICO-CHEMICALS CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL (DECEMBER, 2014 - FEBRUARY, 2015)

Sr.

No. Parameters Unit Jolva Ambetha Suva Vadadla Dahej

Project

site

1 pH (at 25°c) -- 9.04 8.85 9.02 8.72 9.18 9.32

2 Conductivity mS/cm 0.7 0.4 1.2 1.1 0.6 1.4

3 Soil texture -- Silty clay Silty clay Silty clay Silty clay Silty clay Silty clay

4 Colour -- Blackish

brown

Blackish

brown

Blackish

brown

Blackish

brown

Blackish

brown

Blackish

brown

5 Water holding capacity % 72.49 92.67 63.76 71.27 66.21 74.93

6 Bulk density gm/cc 1.29 1.27 1.31 1.28 1.24 1.3

7 Chloride mg/kg 104.14 90.64 147.53 134.99 94.50 227.56

8 Exchangeable calcium as Ca mg/kg 2244.48 1775.544 1731.456 1334.664 2148.288 1703.4

9 Exchangeable sodium as Na mg/kg 2900 1600 1200 3600 2200 2700

10 Available potassium as K mg/kg 1700 480 370 410 720 490

11 Organic Matter % 0.41 0.55 0.81 0.70 0.37 0.30

12 Organic Carbon % 0.24 0.32 0.47 0.41 0.21 0.17

13 Exchangeable magnesium as Mg mg/kg 228.608 12.16 145.92 396.416 196.992 172.672

14 Nitrogen as N kg./hec 190.96 215.22 206.89 194.27 208.98 203.26

15 Available phosphorus kg./hec 0.075 0.20 0.15 0.13 0.08 0.12

16 Total zinc as Zn mg/kg 70.84 72.82 74.51 79.41 69.35 71.56

17 Manganese as Mn mg/kg 345.45 412.96 372.69 417.41 359.61 387.17

18 Chromium as Cr mg/kg 34.71 31.95 36.52 40.86 37.80 36.80

19 Total lead as Pb mg/kg 2.40 2.45 2.56 2.68 2.32 2.62

20 Total cadmium as Cd mg/kg 1.36 1.10 1.41 1.00 1.26 1.32

21 Total copper as Cu mg/kg 57.07 51.13 53.39 61.08 55.87 58.07

78

PHYSICO-CHEMICALS CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL (FEBRUARY, 2017)

Sr.

No.

Parameter Project

Site (S1)

Jolva

(S2)

Suva

(S3)

Vav

(S4)

Dahej

(S5)

Vadadla

(S6)

Ambetha

(S7)

Luvara

(S8)

Galenda

(S9)

1. pH 7.79 7.51 7.61 8.87 7.02 7.32 7.39 7.28 7.37

2. Temperature (0C) 24.9 25.2 25.2 25.1 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2

3. Moisture (%) 6.82 5.77 6.39 6.05 2.31 0.91 2.48 1.82 0.12

4. SO4—2

(mg/kg) 129.6 592.2 129.9 161.8 1426.4 2.67 668.4 232.6 252.7

5. Chlorides (mg/kg) 208.8 1453 249.9 520.7 3178 172.4 1330 54.2 81.3

6. Total hardness (mg/kg) 745.9 624.9 786.2 441.7 1048.3 766 241.9 96.7 78.62

7. Organic Matter (%) 5.33 8.5 5.25 2.46 4.83 7.43 6.1 6.22 5.71

8. Bulk density (g/cm3) 1.37 1.34 1.26 1.25 1.26 1.18 1.25 1.26 1.18

9. Calcium (mg/kg) 153.5 210 161.6 100.6 298.9 266 48.4 23.43 16.96

10. WHC (%) 54.7 54.3 53.5 78.61 78.92 73.47 84.94 78.92 77.93

11. Porosity (%) 48.3 49.43 52.45 52.84 37.26 37.29 37.26 37.26 37.29

12. Grain Size (%)

Gravel 02 02 02 02 00 00 00 10 12

Coarse sand 03 02 03 01 03 06 04 04 12

Medium sand 06 12 13 02 05 11 06 11 34

Fine sand 07 12 12 48 10 06 03 18 09

Silt + Clay 82 72 70 47 82 77 87 57 33

PHYSICO-CHEMICALS CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL (HEAVY METALS)

Sr.

No.

Parameter

(mg/kg)

Project

Site (S1)

Jolva

(S2)

Suva

(S3)

Vav

(S4)

Dahej

(S5)

Vadadla

(S6)

Ambetha

(S7)

Luvara

(S8)

Galenda

(S9)

1. Na 2580 584 517 819 694 956 623 768 573

2. Cu+2

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

3. Fe+3

12.14 9.1 17.80 214 8.7 33 429.5 40.9 48.5

4. Cd 0.061 BDL 0.022 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.027

5. K 402 451 985 1053 332 822 556 925 1069

6. Ni+2

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

7. Pb+2

5.92 BDL 0.98 BDL 2.17 BDL 2.02 2.24 0.91

Note:

Minimum Detectable Limit:

Nickel – 0.1 mg/kg

Copper – 0.5 mg/kg

79

IN EARLIER EIA STUDY REPORT OF SEIAA/SEAC, GANDHINAGAR, FOLLOWING DETAILS

FOR GAS DISPPERSION MODELLING WERE GIVEN:

Presentation & comments on the predicted Results

In the present case, model simulations have been carried out for the winter season.

Modelling studies reveal that the maximum incremental short term ground level

concentrations for Particulate Matter (PM10), SO2, & NOx likely to be encountered as

follows:

STUDY PERIOD – (DECEMBER’ 2014 – FEBRUARY’ 2015)

24 hourly peak incremental concentrations computed

Peak Incremental

Concentration in µg/m3 Scenario

PM10 NO2 SO2

Proposed Specialty Chemicals & Fluoro

Chemicals manufacturing Plant

3.32 14.32 10.03

80

81

82

83

STUDY PERIOD – (FEBRUARY’ 2016 – MARCH’ 2016)

The incremental concentrations are estimated for the monitoring period. For each time

scale, i.e. for 24 hr. the model computes the highest concentrations observed during the

period over all the measurement points. Existing value has been covered in the

Background Ambient Air Quality Monitoring. Predicted max. GLC at various locations for

different parameters are given below:

Peak Incremental Concentration of Different Parameters at Project Site is incorporated in

Isopleths

S.

No. Parameter

Baseline AAQ

Monitored (Max.

Conc.)

(µg/m3)

Predicted Max.

GLC due to

Proposed Project

(µg/m3)

Resultant

Concentration

(µg/m3)

NAAQS

Standard

(µg/m3)

1. PM10 96.0 1.3 97.3 100

2. SO2 17.6 4.06 21.66 80

3. NO2 28.3 1.07 29.37 80

4. Cl2 BDL 0.00047 0.00047 -

5. HCl BDL 0.00104 0.00104 -

6. HF BDL 0.00004 0.00004 -

7. NH3 BDL 0.0093 0.0093 400

Peak Incremental Concentration of Different Parameters at Jolva Village is incorporated

in Isopleths

S.

No. Parameter

Baseline AAQ

Monitored (Max.

Conc.)

(µg/m3)

Predicted Max.

GLC due to

Proposed Project

(µg/m3)

Resultant

Concentration

(µg/m3)

NAAQS

Standard

(µg/m3)

1. PM10 93.0 0.3 93.3 100

2. SO2 14.8 1.0 15.8 80

3. NO2 21.6 0.3 21.9 80

4. Cl2 BDL 0.0001 0.0001 -

5. HCl BDL 0.0001 0.0001 -

6. HF BDL 0.00002 0.00002 -

7. NH3 BDL 0.002 0.002 400

84

Peak Incremental Concentration of Different Parameters at Vadadla Village is

incorporated in Isopleths

S.

No. Parameter

Baseline AAQ

Monitored (Max.

Conc.)

(µg/m3)

Predicted Max.

GLC due to

Proposed Project

(µg/m3)

Resultant

Concentration

(µg/m3)

NAAQS

Standard

(µg/m3)

1. PM10 86.0 0.3 86.3 100

2. SO2 13.4 1.0 14.4 80

3. NO2 22.3 0.3 22.6 80

4. Cl2 BDL 0.00005 0.0001 -

5. HCl BDL 0.0001 0.0001 -

6. HF BDL 0.00001 0.00002 -

7. NH3 BDL 0.0009 0.002 400

Peak Incremental Concentration of Different Parameters at Dahej Village is incorporated

in Isopleths

S.

No. Parameter

Baseline AAQ

Monitored (Max.

Conc.)

(µg/m3)

Predicted Max.

GLC due to

Proposed Project

(µg/m3)

Resultant

Concentration

(µg/m3)

NAAQS

Standard

(µg/m3)

1. PM10 95.0 0.3 95.3 100

2. SO2 15.1 1.0 16.1 80

3. NO2 24.5 0.2 24.7 80

4. Cl2 BDL 0.00008 0.00008 -

5. HCl BDL 0.0001 0.0001 -

6. HF BDL - - -

7. NH3 BDL 0.0009 0.0009 400

Peak Incremental Concentration of Different Parameters at Suva Village is incorporated

in Isopleths

S.

No. Parameter

Baseline AAQ

Monitored (Max.

Conc.)

(µg/m3)

Predicted Max.

GLC due to

Proposed Project

(µg/m3)

Resultant

Concentration

(µg/m3)

NAAQS

Standard

(µg/m3)

1. PM10 81.0 0.3 81.3 100

2. SO2 13.5 1.0 14.5 80

3. NO2 22.5 0.2 22.7 80

4. Cl2 BDL 0.0001 0.0001 -

5. HCl BDL 0.0001 0.0001 -

6. HF BDL 0.00001 0.00001 -

7. NH3 BDL 0.001 0.001 400

85

Peak Incremental Concentration of Different Parameters at Ambhetha Village is

incorporated in Isopleths

S.

No. Parameter

Baseline AAQ

Monitored (Max.

Conc.)

(µg/m3)

Predicted Max.

GLC due to

Proposed Project

(µg/m3)

Resultant

Concentration

(µg/m3)

NAAQS

Standard

(µg/m3)

1. PM10 82.0 0.3 82.3 100

2. SO2 13.1 1.0 14.1 80

3. NO2 22.6 0.3 22.9 80

4. Cl2 BDL 0.00007 0.00007 -

5. HCl BDL 0.0003 0.0003 -

6. HF BDL 0.00001 0.00001 -

7. NH3 BDL 0.002 0.002 400

Conclusion

The maximum incremental GLCs due to the proposed expansion project for different

parameters are superimposed on the respective maximum baseline concentrations

recorded at the monitoring locations (as shown above) during the field monitoring period.

The maximum GLCs after implementation of the proposed expansion project are very

much likely to be within the prescribed NAAQ standards. It can also be concluded from the

AQIP study (i.e. predicted concentrations superimposed on the 10 km radius study area

map) that there will be no negative impact on the various attributes like human settlement,

water bodies, educational institutes, religious places in different villages etc. falling within

10 km radius study area of the plant site due to proposed expansion project; as the

predicted concentration of different parameters is well within the prescribed limits.

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

STUDY PERIOD – (FEBRUARY, 2017)

DETAILS OF EMISSION FROM STACK & VENTS (EXISTING)

(* Permissible Limits)

STACK & VENTS ATTACHED TO:

1. Boiler (15 TPH)

2. Boiler (35 TPH + 35 TPH + 60 TPH – Common Stack)

3. DG Set (500 KVA)

4. DG Set (500 KVA)

5. DG Set (840 KVA)

6. DG Set (840 KVA)

SOURCE OF EMISSION SR.

NO.

OPERATING

PARAMETER

UNIT

1 2 3 4 5 6

1. Stack Height Meter 40 94 11 11 11 11

2. Diameter Meter 1 2.4 0.2 0.2 0.35 0.35

3. Flue Gas

Temperature

0K 448 448 398 398 398 398

4. Air Pollution

Control

Equipment

- Multi

Cyclone

Separator

Electrostatic

Precipitator

Adequate

Stack

Height

Adequate

Stack

Height

Adequate

Stack

Height

Adequate

Stack

Height

5. Flue Gas Velocity m/s 11 16 8 8 8 8

6. Emission

Concentration

SPM

SO2

NOx

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

94




7. TCE/PCE Plant Heater

8. HFC 134a Plant Heater

9. AHF Plant Heater

10. AHF Plant Drying System

11. HF Plant Central Absorption System

12. TCE/PCE Plant (Central Absorption System)

SOURCE OF EMISSION SR.

NO.

OPERATING

PARAMETER

UNIT

7 8 9 10 11 12

1. Stack Height Meter 50 50 46 35 30 20

2. Diameter Meter 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.08 0.08

3. Flue Gas

Temperature

0K 413 413 413 413 308 308

4. Air Pollution

Control

Equipment

- Adequate

Stack

Height &

Efficient

Burner

Adequate

Stack

Height &

Efficient

Burner

Adequate

Stack

Height &

Efficient

Burner

Cyclone

Separator/

Bag Filter

Continuou

s Water

Circulation

Continuou

s Hypo

Circulation

5. Flue Gas Velocity m/s 11 11 11 11 6 6

6. Emission

Concentration

SPM

SO2

NOx

HF

Cl2

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

150

262

94

-

-

150

262

94

-

-

150

262

94

-

-

150

262

94

-

-

-

-

-

6

-

-

-

-

-

9

95




13. TCE/PCE Plant (Central Absorption System)

14. R 134 and R 125 Plant (Central Absorption System)

15. Reactor/ Vessel (10 Nos.)- Central Absorption System




19. Cl2 Plant after Scrubber

20. Cl2 Plant after Scrubber

SOURCE OF EMISSION SR

NO

OPERATING

PARAMETER

UNIT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

1. Stack height Meter 30 30 30 30 20 20 20 20

2. Diameter Meter 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08

3. Flue Gas

Temperature

0K 308 308 308 308 308 308 308 308

4. Air Pollution

Control

Equipment

- Continu

ous

Water

Circulati

on

Continu

ous

Water

Circulati

on

Continu

ous

Water

Circulati

on

Continu

ous

Water

Circulati

on

Continu

ous

Hypo

Circulati

on

Continu

ous

Sodium

Thiosulp

hate

solution

scrubbin

g

Continu

ous

Hypo

Circulati

on

Continu

ous

Water

Circulati

on

5. Flue Gas

Velocity

m/s 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

6. Emission

concentration

HCl

Cl2

HF

Br2

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

20

-

-

-

20

-

-

-

20

-

6

-

20

-

-

-

-

9

-

-

-

-

-

2

-

9

-

-

20

-

-

-

96

DETAILS OF EMISSION FROM STACK & VENTS (PROPOSED)



21. Boiler (75 TPH + 75 TPH – Common Stack)

22. Boiler (100 TPH + 100 TPH – Common Stack)

23. DG Set (4200 KVA)

24. DG Set (4200 KVA)

25. DG Set (4200 KVA)

26. Thermic Fluid Heater (20 Nos. – Common Stack)

27. Dust Collectors (10 Nos. – Common Stack)


NO

OPERATING

PARAMETER

UNIT

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

1. Stack height Meter 120 135 30 30 30 30 30

2. Diameter Meter 3 3.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

3. Flue Gas

Temperature

0K 448 448 398 398 398 413 413

4. Air Pollution

Control

Equipment

- Electrost

atic

Precipita

tor

Electrost

atic

Precipita

tor

Adequat

e Stack

Height

Adequat

e Stack

Height

Adequat

e Stack

Height

Adequat

e Stack

Height &

Efficient

Burner

Bag Filter

5. Flue Gas Velocity m/s 21 25 11 11 11 11 11

6. Emission

concentration

SPM

SO2

NOx

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

150

262

94

97

DETAILS OF EMISSION FROM STACK & VENTS (PROPOSED)



28. Bromine + HCl (1 No. Central Absorption System)

29. Bromine + HCl + HF (1 No. Central Absorption System)

30. HCl + Chlorine Scrubber (8 Nos. Absorption System)

31. HCl + Chlorine + HF Scrubber (2 Nos. Absorption System)

32. HCl + Cl2 + NH3 Scrubber (2 Nos. Absorption System)

33. HF (7 Nos. Absorption System)

34. NH3 (1 Nos. Absorption System)

35. Laboratory (4 Nos. Absorption System)

36. Tank Farm (12 Nos. absorption system)


NO

OPERATING

PARAMETER

UNIT

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

1. Stack height Meter 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

2. Diameter Meter 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08

3. Flue Gas

Temperature

0K 308 308 308 308 308 308 308 308 308

4. Air Pollution

Control Equipment

- Dilute

HCl +

Water

+

Caustic

Scrubb

er

Dilute

HCl +

Water

+

Causti

c

Scrubb

er

Dilute

HCl +

Causti

c

Scrubb

er

Dilute

HCl +

HF +

Causti

c

Scrubb

er

HCl +

Water

+

Causti

c

Scrubb

er

Dilute

HF +

Caustic

Scrubb

er

Water

+

Causti

c

Scrubb

er

Water

+

Causti

c

Scrubb

er

Water

+

Caustic

Scrubb

er

5. Flue Gas Velocity m/s 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

6. Emission

concentration

HCl

Cl2

HF

Br2

NH3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

mg/Nm3

20

-

-

2

-

20

-

6

2

-

20

9

-

-

-

20

9

6

-

-

20

9

-

-

175

-

-

6

-

-

-

-

-

-

175

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

98

ISOPLETH FOR PM (EXISTING)

99

ISOPLETHS FOR SO2 (EXISTING)

100

ISOPLETHS FOR NOx (EXISTING)

101

ISOPLETHS FOR HCl (EXISTING)

102

ISOPLETHS FOR Cl2 (EXISTING)

103

ISOPLETHS FOR HF (EXISTING)

104

ISOPLETHS FOR Br2 (EXISTING)

105

ISOPLETHS FOR PM (PROPOSED)

106

ISOPLETHS FOR SO2 (PROPOSED)

107

ISOPLETHS FOR NOx (PROPOSED)

108

ISOPLETHS FOR HCl (PROPOSED)

109

ISOPLETHS FOR Cl2 (PROPOSED)

110

ISOPLETHS FOR HF (PROPOSED)

111

ISOPLETHS FOR Br2 (PROPOSED)

112

ISOPLETHS FOR NH3 (PROPOSED)

113

SUMMARY OF ISCST3 MODEL OUTPUT (EXISTING)

CONCENTRATION (µg/m3) SR

NO

LOCATIONS CO-ORDINATES

(X, Y) PM SO2 NOx HCl Cl2 HF Br2

1. Project-site (A1) (0,0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2. Jolva (A2) (1591, 568) 0.16 0.27 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3. Suva (A3) (1932, -1932) 0.34 0.59 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Vav (A4) (1023, 3750) 0.07 0.12 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Dahej (A5) (-5114, 455) 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6. Vadadla (A6) (-227, 1705) 0.12 0.21 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7. Ambetha (A7) (-4545, -2045) 0.12 0.21 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

8. Luvara (A8) (-8523, -3409) 0.06 0.10 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9. Galenda (A9) (4205, 2045) 0.06 0.11 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION (µg/m3) SR.

NO.

X, Y

CO-ORDINATES PM SO2 NOx HCl Cl2 HF Br2

1. (-1000, -1000) 3.66 - - - - - -

2. (-1000, -1000) - 6.40 - - - - -

3. (-1000, -1000) - - 2.30 - - - -

4. (-1000, -1000) - - - 1.9E-02 - - -

5. (-1000, -1000) - - - - 5.5E-03 - -

6. (-1000, -1000) - - - - - 1.2E-03 -

7. (-1000, -1000) - - - - - - 4.8E-04

114

SUMMARY OF ISCST3 MODEL OUTPUT (PROPOSED)

As manufacturing activities have not yet started, the predictions were made using CPCB

permissible limit as these concentrations will in no case be exceeded. Ground level

concentrations calculated for proposed activities are superimposed on existing ambient

air quality monitoring results and combined values are found within permissible

National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

CONCENTRATION (µg/m3) SR

NO

LOCATIONS CO-ORDINATES

(X, Y) PM SO2 NOx HCl Cl2 HF Br2 NH3

1. Project-site (A1) (0,0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2. Jolva (A2) (1591, 568) 0.17 0.29 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3. Suva (A3) (1932, -1932) 0.42 0.74 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Vav (A4) (1023, 3750) 0.10 0.18 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Dahej (A5) (-5114, 455) 0.07 0.12 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6. Vadadla (A6) (-227, 1705) 0.15 0.26 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7. Ambetha (A7) (-4545, -2045) 0.20 0.35 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

8. Luvara (A8) (-8523, -3409) 0.11 0.18 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9. Galenda (A9) (4205, 2045) 0.12 0.20 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION (µg/m3) SR.

NO.

X, Y

CO-ORDINATES PM SO2 NOx HCl Cl2 HF Br2 NH3

1. (-1000, -1000) 4.11 - - - - - - -

2. (-1000, -1000) - 7.19 - - - - - -

3. (-1000, -1000) - - 2.58 - - - - -

4. (-1000, -1000) - - - 1.3E-02 - - - -

5. (-1000, -1000) - - - - 3.4E-03 - - -

6. (-1000, -1000) - - - - - 2.3E-03 - -

7. (-1000, -1000) - - - - - - 5.1E-04 -

8. (-1000, -1000) - - - - - - - 4.4E-02

115

PREDICTED AMBIENT AIR QUALITY Unit: µg/m3

PM SO2 NOx HCl Cl2 HF Br2 NH3 SR.

NO.

SAMPLING

LOCATION AVERAGE

1. Project-site (A1) 124.10 16.72 18.42 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 6.08

2. Jolva (A2) 115.07 15.22 16.97 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 1.58

3. Suva (A3) 118.42 16.98 18.50 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 1.84

4. Vav (A4) 116.10 16.24 17.76 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 1.74

5. Dahej (A5) 113.15 17.41 18.40 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 1.75

6. Vadadla (A6) 112.24 12.23 14.15 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 1.71

7. Ambetha (A7) 116.27 12.76 14.21 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 1.61

8. Luvara (A8) 114.17 13.66 15.46 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 1.37

9. Galenda (A9) 115.21 13.47 15.13 <1.0 <5.0 BDL BDL 1.69

SUB: SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION … · Dear Sir, This has reference to the above mentioned subject matter. ... investment will be Rs. 150 – 300 Crores, considering this

Documents