Digital economy and structural change Authors Stefan Heng +49 69 910-31774 [email protected]Bernd Klusmann +49 30 27576-457 [email protected]Florian König +49 30 27576-456 [email protected]Editor Antje Stobbe Technical Assistant Sabine Kaiser Deutsche Bank Research Frankfurt am Main Germany Internet: www.dbresearch.com E-mail: [email protected]Fax: +49 69 910-31877 Managing Director Thomas Mayer 81 IT harbours huge “green” potential. This applies on the one hand to the saving of resources in IT itself (―green in IT‖). But on the other hand it also applies to the resources that can be saved by implementing intelligent IT systems in the economy as a whole (―green by IT‖). 54% of the companies we surveyed for this study know the difference between the two concepts. So while the difference is starting to sink in, there is still scope for raising awareness. Best-practice examples should be given greater prominence. As our survey makes clear, only 26% of companies feel compelled to implement green IT projects for operational reasons. Instead, at many companies the key factor is the strength of the convictions held by the executive on the idea of green IT. At 45% of the companies, it is top management that initiates such projects. Best-practice examples can help in efforts to make the complexity of prospective projects transparent. Gearing project planning to positive examples makes it easier for companies to estimate the measures necessary for their own IT system. To be able to leverage untapped potential, structures will need to change. To fulfil the environmental and resource targets, though, the companies will have to revamp their structures and rigorously integrate their environmental and energy management activities into their IT design. That is still a long way off, however. Some 38% of the companies in our sample have appointed an environmental officer. At the same time, some green IT projects have to proceed even though only 32% of the companies have installed overarching budget responsibility for energy and IT. “Green by IT” opens sizeable scope for economic and ecological action. Companies from different sectors hope on the one hand that by means of intelligent IT systems and innovative resource-saving processes they can counter cost pressures. On the other, they say they want to be able to offer customers new goods and services and offer their staff more flexible job models in the competition for top talent. Companies are more likely to implement ecologically relevant innovations if these pay off in the short run. Our survey finds that investment risk is the major hurdle thwarting the implementation of green IT (43% of respondents agree strongly or very strongly). On this score, 60% of the companies see the amortisation period of green IT projects falling in a depreciation framework of up to four years. January 13, 2011 Green IT More than a passing fad! A joint study by:
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
―Green IT‖ can easily be misinterpreted, so prematurely kindled
expectations may soon be dashed. After all, IT is not ―green‖ at first
glance – and not only because more intensive use results in higher
energy consumption. Nonetheless, IT does have ―green‖ potential.
This applies on the one hand not only to the saving of resources in
IT infrastructure itself (―green in IT‖), but it also applies on the other
to the resources that are ultimately saved by the use of IT in the
economy as a whole (―green by IT‖). Green IT and its related
potential are understood and assessed in very different ways in
practice across the broad spectrum between ―green in IT‖ and
―green by IT‖. This observation was the starting point for the present
study by Deutsche Bank Research and BITKOM‘s Green IT
Advisory Office.
Our study, with its focus on economic aspects, seeks to analyse the
trends shaping up in practice and the motives driving green IT
projects in the first place. With this objective, our study is divided
into three sections: the first section summarises the main findings of
our survey, depicting the results in an overview featuring individual
charts and graphs. The second section gives a breakdown of the
findings of the survey in light of the experience gathered in
consultations on green IT and thus illustrates the practical
challenges facing green IT. Finally, the third section presents the
conclusions drawn from the survey and actual advisory experience
in the context of a more highly aggregated macroeconomic
assessment.
A word of thanks
We would like to thank the German Association for Small and
Medium-sized Businesses (BVMW), the Association of German
Chambers of Industry and Commerce (DIHK), ICTswitzerland and
Microsoft Germany, who supported our survey.
Survey on Green IT
Deutsche Bank Research and the Green IT Advisory Office
established by BITKOM e.V. joined forces to conduct a survey
among industry providers and users on the subject of green IT. With
a response rate of 10%, we were able to evaluate a total of 237
completed questionnaires in our analysis. At the majority of the
respondent companies, the responses came from the top
management (69%). Some 32% of the companies classified
themselves as only green IT users and, logically, 68% as green IT
providers. Among the green IT providers 25% identified themselves
as vendors, 44% as service providers and 30% as both vendors and
service providers.
The bulk of the participants say they belong to the IT sector (53% of
all responses); this is followed at a large interval by the
manufacturing sector and the liberal professions (12% each). In
terms of revenues and headcount, participation in our survey was
particularly pronounced among very small companies (35% have
less than 50 employees) and very large companies (26% with over
2,500 employees). At 53% of the respondent companies the
decision-makers had an academic background in engineering or the
natural sciences. The providers of green IT technologies group was
Glossary of main
abbreviations
ICT Information and communi- cation technology
SaaS Software as a Service
CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent
Measure of greenhouse gas effect of emissions, standardised to CO2
Wh Watt-hour Unit of energy
kWh Kilowatt-hour, 1 kWh = 10
3
Wh
TWh Terawatt-hour, 1 TWh = 10
12
Wh
Source: DB Research, 2011 1
81
4 January 13, 2011
Majority based in Germany
Investment risk, stakeholder consent
and inadequate experience curb
progress
Support needed from policymakers
and consumers
Need for a committed executive and
attentive staff
Budget responsibility seldom
converges below top management
Need for specific IT support
explicitly also queried about experiences to date in their in-house
use and their expectations and assessments of green IT.
The majority of the companies that participated in our green IT
survey are based and operate in Germany (96%) – regional focal
points being the metropolitan areas of Berlin, Munich, the Rhine-
Main region and Stuttgart. Nonetheless, thanks to the support of
ICTswitzerland there were also five users and three providers from
Switzerland. Two other users from third countries also participated
in the survey.
Key findings of our survey
After the initial hype that typically accompanies the launch of new
technologies, green IT has now entered the phase of constructive
debate and actual implementation in company structures. Some
40% of the companies surveyed in this study consider the
amortisation period for green IT projects to be in the depreciation
framework of up to four years. Despite this significant progress in
implementation there is nonetheless still no lack of hurdles to be
cleared. A number of companies in our survey say these major
hurdles thwarting the implementation of green IT projects lie in
investment risk (43% agree strongly or very strongly), stakeholder
consent and the as yet still inadequate degree of in-house
experience with green IT projects (33% each).
In our sample, many companies say the explanation for the sluggish
implementation of green IT projects is that it has too little importance
on the public agenda (14%: agree strongly; 34%: agree), the lack of
transparency of the product range (7%: agree strongly; 30%: agree)
and the lack of a budget (11%: agree strongly; 21%: agree). By
contrast, the potential pressure from the competition or an internal
lack of agreement is only seldom cited as a reason for sluggish
implementation. Apparently policymakers and consumers in
particular are also key in deciding whether green IT makes faster
progress.
38% of the respondents have explicitly appointed an environmental
officer who is responsible for meeting the company‘s climate and
resource targets. In 66% of the companies the upper management
or the head of the in-house IT section initiates the green IT projects.
In addition, the survey participants also often cite the commitment of
staff as one of the ―other‖ stimuli. Company training is very important
here and is already being conducted at one-third of the companies
surveyed. So green IT needs a committed executive, but also
attentive trained staff.
So far, green IT has had to proceed in many companies despite the
fact that budget responsibility for energy and IT does not converge
below the top management level. Overarching budget responsibility
below this level is to be found in 32% of the companies analysed.
Many companies have explicitly formulated climate and resource
targets in their strategies and are addressing the strategic
sustainability objective with specifically coordinated IT support. 60%
of the companies surveyed use management and control technology
or management systems to achieve these strategic corporate goals.
In the following we give an overview of the findings of our survey:
Green IT: More than a passing fad!
January 13, 2011 5
Findings of our survey among users of green IT
38% of the respondents have explicitly appointed an environmental officer who is responsible for meeting the company‘s climate and resource targets. With this finding it should be noted that the majority of the respondents are from small and medium-sized companies. 75% of the subgroup of larger companies with more than 2,500 employees that is not represented here say they have appointed an environmental officer. Differences in capital and human resources are part of the reason for the fact that large companies tend to work with an appointed officer on the subject of green IT more than small companies do.
At many participating companies green IT has so far had to proceed despite the fact that budget responsibility for energy and IT only converges at the uppermost level of decision-making. Overarching budget responsibility below the top level is to be found in over one-third of the companies we analysed.
At 66% of the participating companies the upper management or the head of the IT section initiates the green IT projects. In addition, the participants in our survey also often cite the commit-ment of staff as one of the ―other‖ stimuli. So green IT needs a committed executive, but also attentive staff.
yes 38%
no 54%
n.a. 8%
N=237
Nearly 40% have an environmental officer
Companies with an environmental officer
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 2
yes 32%
no 51%
n.a. 17%
N=237
Green IT must often proceed without overarching
budget responsibility
Has budget responsibility for energy and IT converged?
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 3
11%
21%
5% 45%
8%
10%
Environment officer Head of IT Finance / Purchasing
Upper management Other n.a.
Green IT often initiated by upper management
Places where green IT is initiated in companies
N=237, multiple responses possible
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 4
81
6 January 13, 2011
In keeping with the central role of upper management in the implementation of green IT projects it emerges that in close to 90% of the respondent companies the stimulus for such projects comes from merely one or, at most, two places.
A majority of the respondent companies know the difference between ―green in IT‖ and ―green by IT‖. The significantly differing approaches of the concepts that fall under this keyword have sunk in with many decision-makers, but there is still scope for raising awareness. In the subgroup of companies that have already implemented green IT projects some two-thirds have realised there is a difference between green in IT and green by IT – but still not everyone.
More than two-thirds of the companies
surveyed have set climate targets.
Within this group, half of the companies
have explicitly anchored at most two
targets in their strategy, and one-
quarter of them four.
1 60%
2 27%
3 10%
>3 3%
N=201
Green IT needs lone wolf
Number of places that initiate green IT in the company
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 5
25%
23%
25%
25%
2%
1 2 3 4 >4
N=176
Many have defined one or two climate and/or
resource targets
Number of climate and/or resource targets anchored in company strategy
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 7
yes 54%
no 37%
n.a. 9%
N=237
Majority know the difference
Difference between "green in IT" and "green by IT" has sunk in
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 6
Green IT: More than a passing fad!
January 13, 2011 7
24%
34% 7%
28%
7%
Management systems (with focus on CSR, carbon life cycle management)
Management & control technology (for data centres, facility management, PCs)
Other
no
n.a.
Some 60% use management systems or
management & control technology
IT systems used to achieve targets
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011
N=237, multiple responses possible
10
Only 26% of the respondent companies feel compelled to implement green IT projects. At those companies that do feel this compulsion, the pressure is often explained by pointing to heat build-up in the server room and energy costs. Thus, in many companies, reasons other than the ones listed here play the crucial role in decisions on the implementation of green IT.
One-third of the respondents provide training for their employees on the subject of green IT. So this area will still harbour considerable potential going forward.
Some 60% of the companies surveyed use management and control technology or management systems to achieve the company‘s strategic targets. Among the other supporting IT systems the participants often refer to virtualisation. Only a minority of the participants say they want to approach the targeted objectives without any special supporting IT systems whatsoever.
5% 5%
10%
6% 56%
18%
Bottleneck in energy supply Scarcity of space Heat build-up in server room Other no n.a.
Only a minority feels compelled to implement
green IT
Q: "Do you feel compelled to implement green IT in the near future? If so, by which factor?"
N=237, multiple responses possible
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 8
yes 34%
no 50%
n.a. 16%
N=236
Considerable potential for training on subject of
green IT
Participating companies that train stafff on green IT
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 9
81
8 January 13, 2011
Many companies explain the really slow implementation of green IT projects as being due to the often insufficient pressure from policymakers and consumers (14%: agree strongly; 34%: agree), the lack of transparency of the product range (7%: agree strongly; 30%: agree) and the lack of a budget (11%: agree strongly; 21%: agree). By contrast, the potential pressure from the competition or an internal lack of agreement is only seldom cited as a reason for sluggish implementation. Obviously, the sustained interest of policymakers and consumers could give the realisation of green IT projects at companies an additional fillip.
A number of companies say the major hurdles thwarting the implementation of green IT projects lie in investment risk (43% agree strongly or very strongly), stakeholder consent and the as yet still inadequate degree of in-house experience with green IT projects (33% each). Besides, the participants also refer to the conflict between attaining short-term returns on investments and installing strategic, long-term projects. By contrast, the respondent companies regard the availability of the IT infra-structure (7%) as the smallest hurdle in the implementation of green IT projects.
Internal financing with equity capital is by far the most important method of funding for green IT projects. Obviously, many companies do not bank on green IT until they have already generated the required capital.
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Investment risk
Lack of experience with individual solutions
Steakholder consent
Potential conflict over data security
Financing risk (availability, costs of funding)
Complexity of instruments for achieving energy efficiency
Availability of IT infrastructure
Agree very strongly Agree strongly Agree more or less
Agree little Disagree n.a.
N=237
Hurdle of economic efficiency
Hurdles thwarting realisation of green IT projects at companies
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 12
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
No pressure from policymakers or consumers
No green IT budget
Green IT product range is not transparent
Competitors not doing anything either
Lack of in-house agreement
Lack of agreement between IT and users
Agree strongly Agree Agree partly Rather disagree Disagree altogether n.a.
N=237
Pressure from policymakers and consumers plays
important role
Q: "What would you say are the reasons that green IT is not being implemented?"
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 11
Financing via bank of provider Government promotion
Other n.a.
Green IT projects usually financed internally
Usual method of funding green IT projects
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011
N=237, multiple responses possible
13
Green IT: More than a passing fad!
January 13, 2011 9
Findings of our survey specific to the providers of green IT
Over half of the respondent providers regard investment in green IT projects to typically have a very minor volume of less than EUR 200,000. By contrast, only almost one provider in ten says the typical volume is more than EUR 500,000. The responses given here might also suggest that green IT users initially approach the issue cautiously, assuming a manageable level of financial risk owing to their overall profitability.
As to be expected with new technologies, 66% of the respondents look for rapid revenue growth over the coming five years; the majority call for a rate of 1% to 15%. Nonetheless, nearly an equal number of providers expect either a still more substantial upswing or else a period of flat growth in green IT. This shows that the market picture on the outlook for green IT is still pretty mixed.
Over 40% of the respondents estimate that users of green IT can achieve energy savings of more than 15%. As to be expected, only a negligibly small minority think that customers will not achieve tangible savings with green IT. Evidently, green IT and energy conservation go hand in hand in the overwhelming majority of projects for the user.
Typical investment volume for green IT projects (EUR 10,000)
Source: DB Research and Green IT Advisory Office (BITKOM), 2011 14
81
10 January 13, 2011
More than one respondent in four of the green IT providers expects that their clients‘ investment in green IT will pay off within two years. Nearly two-thirds of the providers see green IT projects being amortised within a period of three to four years. This means that managers who focus exclusively on very short-term profitability will be more reluctant to invest in green IT.