NSTX 12 th ITPA MHD Meeting 10-2008 – S.A. Sabbagh/S.P. Gerhardt 1 Studies of 2/1 NTM onset threshold vs. rotation and rotation shear in NSTX S.A. Sabbagh 1 / S.P. Gerhardt 2 1 Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA 2 Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA For the NSTX Macroscopic Stability Topical Science Group 12th Meeting of the ITPA MHD Stability Topical Group October 20-22, 2008 CRPP, Lausanne, Switzerland Supported by Office of Science Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew U Ioffe Inst RRC Kurchatov Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep U Quebec College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Maryland U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin v1.2
13
Embed
Studies of 2/1 NTM onset threshold vs. rotation and rotation shear in NSTX
Office of Science. Supported by. Studies of 2/1 NTM onset threshold vs. rotation and rotation shear in NSTX. College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Research to determine NTM onset conditions in high beta ST
Goals Categorize NTM trigger mechanisms in a high-, rapidly-rotating
plasma Determine onset and stabilization criteria for NTMs
Outline NTM characteristics in high beta ST plasmas Various NTM triggering mechanisms Relation of NTM onset and magnitude of plasma rotation Correlation of NTM onset with toroidal flow shear at q = 2 surface
ELM Cases:• Lots of colinearity in the data (flow vs. flow shear. Vs differential rotation), but best
correlation is with flow shear.
“Triggerless” Cases: • More scatter in data, equally good correlation with flow shear and differential rotation.• Additional physics may be playing a role, including q0~1 and N near ideal kink limit