STUDENTS’ FEEDBACK REPORT PG Students A survey of PG students’ response to syllabus revealed that 64% of the students felt that the syllabus was more than adequate or just adequate. 58% of them felt that the conceptual difficulty of the course was just adequate to handle. 64% of the students opined that the library materials for the course was adequate. The internal exam system met with a highly positive response as 64% of the students felt that it had an adequate effect on the course grade. 67% felt that the prescribed readings of the syllabus was accessible adequately. 87% students remarked that their assignments had been evaluated and returned to them for future reference. 87% agreed that a syllabus outline was provided at the beginning of the course and they also felt that the structure was followed. A vast majority of the students (87%) felt that this syllabus outline was helpful and that outsider experts were invited to address them to supplement conceptual knowledge. 87% also felt that they were provided opportunity to visit industries, laboratories, banks, fields and outside universities
19
Embed
STUDENTS’ FEEDA K REPORTQ11. Was it followed? A.Yes B.No. 87% 13% Q12. Were experts invited to address you? A.Yes B.No 87% 13% Q13. Did you visit industries, laboratories, banks,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
STUDENTS’ FEEDBACK REPORT
PG Students
A survey of PG students’ response to syllabus revealed that 64% of the students felt that the
syllabus was more than adequate or just adequate. 58% of them felt that the conceptual
difficulty of the course was just adequate to handle. 64% of the students opined that the
library materials for the course was adequate. The internal exam system met with a highly
positive response as 64% of the students felt that it had an adequate effect on the course
grade. 67% felt that the prescribed readings of the syllabus was accessible adequately. 87%
students remarked that their assignments had been evaluated and returned to them for
future reference. 87% agreed that a syllabus outline was provided at the beginning of the
course and they also felt that the structure was followed. A vast majority of the students
(87%) felt that this syllabus outline was helpful and that outsider experts were invited to
address them to supplement conceptual knowledge. 87% also felt that they were provided
opportunity to visit industries, laboratories, banks, fields and outside universities
20%
45%
16%
19%
Q1. The syllabus was
A. More than adequate
B. Just adequate
C. Inadequate
D.Can't say
20%
45%
16%
19%
Q2. Your background for
benefiting from the course was
A. More than
adequate
B. Just adequate
C. Inadequate
D.Can't say
0%
58%
13%
29%
Q3. Was the course conceptually
difficult to understand?
A. More than
adequate
B. Just adequate
C. Inadequate
D.Can't say
36%
32%
32%
0%
Q4. How much of the syllabus was
covered in class?
A. More than adequate
B. Just adequate
C. Inadequate
D.Can't say
20%
45%
16%
19%
Q5. What is your opinion about
the library materials for the
course?
A. More than adequate
B. Just adequate
C. Inadequate
D.Can't say
16%
52%
19%
13%
Q6. Were you able to get the
prescribed readings?
A. More than
adequate
B. Just adequate
C. Inadequate
D.Can't say
20%
45%
16%
19%
Q7. What effect do you think the
internal assessment will have on
your course grade?
A. More than
adequate
B. Just adequate
C. Inadequate
D.Can't say
87%
13%
Q8. Were your assignments with
you?
A.Yes
B.No
87%
13%
Q9. Were you provided with a
syllabus outline at the beginning?
A.Yes
B.No
87%
13%
Q10. Was it helpful?
A.Yes
B.No
87%
13%
Q11. Was it followed?
A.Yes
B.No
87%
13%
Q12. Were experts invited to address
you?
A.Yes
B.No
87%
13%
Q13. Did you visit industries,
laboratories, banks, fields and other
universities?
A.Yes
B.No
UG Students
A survey of the U.G students’ response to their syllabus revealed their overall assessment of
the syllabus to be adequate . 77% of the students found it ‘ just adequate’, ‘more than
adequate’ or ‘adequate’. While 76% of the students felt that their backgrounds were
supportive in rendering the syllabus ‘manageable’ or ‘easy’, 24% stated their backgrounds as
insufficient making the syllabus ‘difficult’ and ‘very difficult’. 75% of the students rated the
conceptual difficulty of the course as moderate ( 70-100% of the syllabus was found within
the grasp of students). 75% of the students also agreed that 70-100% of the syllabus was
covered in class. Their opinion about the availability of library materials for the course was
positive as 84% of them felt it was ‘excellent ‘ or ‘adequate’. 87% of them also felt that the
prescribed readings were accessible ‘easily’ or ‘with some difficulty’. 48% of the students
felt that internal assessment had the impact of improving their course grade while 16% felt
that it had a negative impact. 57% students noted that their assignments were made
available to them for future use. 86% students noted that they were provided with a
syllabus outline at the beginning and 89% of them also noted that it was useful. 93%
students observed that the outline/ structure was followed while 63% acknowledged that
outsider experts were invited frequently or occasionally to scaffold the learning of the
syllabus. 52% students , however, remarked that visits to industries, laboratories and
related fields did not occur frequently. The time constraint imposed by the University
Academic Calendar was one of the deterrents of such visits.