Top Banner
Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre [email protected]
26

Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre [email protected].

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Gaven Master
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams

An IntroductionRoger Holdsworth

Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre

[email protected]

Page 2: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 2

Student Action Teams An overview of history and process:

introduction to ideas about SATs The research evidence Some local examples Implementation steps for a school

or cluster of schools A workshop - starting off …

Page 3: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 3

Part A: Overview of SATs

Victorian State Program 1999-2002

Evaluation Reports and Manual Local developments School operational models Resources available

Page 4: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 4

Definition

A group of students who identify and

work on a real issue of community

interest. They carry out research on

the issue and develop solutions -

either proposals for action by others

or action that they themselves take.

Page 5: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 5

Criteria: Identification and formation of a student team; Student determination of the project focus:

either student choice of the focus, or decision about whether to take it on, and how to approach it;

Student engagement in project decision-making and implementation;

A focus within the students’ community, preferably beyond the school;

Processes of research and action by students that intend to make a difference about the chosen topic within the community.

Page 6: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 6

Commissioning: Strong school-community links

around issues of common interest.

Value of a community body to commission and support the team’s work, and to be an audience for its outcomes.

Page 7: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 7

Changed roles…

“In the family, the young remain, while the activities from which they could learn have moved out; in the workplace, the activities from which they could learn remain, but the young themselves have been excluded…“The student role of young persons has become enlarged to the point where that role constitutes the major portion of their youth. But the student role is not a role of taking action and experiencing consequences… It is a relatively passive role, always in preparation for action, but never acting …”

Page 8: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 8

Action poverty …“The consequences of the expansion of the student role, and the action poverty it implies for the young, has been an increased restiveness among the young.

“They are shielded from responsibility, and they become irresponsible; they are held in a dependent status, and they come to act as dependents; they are kept away from productive work, and they become unproductive.”

James Coleman (1972) How do the young become adults?, Johns Hopkins University

Page 9: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 9

Deferred outcomes Outcomes in schools are deferred to a

future - “useful in a job or when you study further”

For some students, outcomes of this future are highly uncertain … and they know this

But also lessons for all students: “Your only value is in what you will become, not what you are or can do today…”

Page 10: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 10

Civics and citizenship …

“Learning about democracy and citizenship when I was at school, was a bit like reading holiday brochures in prison…”Derry Hannam, English School Inspector and adviser/trainer for the Council of Europe on Education for Democratic Citizenship

Page 11: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 11

Development of strong self-concept

control bonding

meaning

Sense of control: capability, competence, impact on one’s own environment, power over one’s self, use of social/life skills, power to change one’s self and environment

Sense of bonding: with family/peers/community, to feel/be wanted, to feel/be loved, to belong, to have basic needs met

Sense of meaning: to feel important, to feel relevant, self-esteem, sense of dignity/honour, able to accomplish tasksAfter Nancy Phillips, 1990

Page 12: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 12

Victorian State Program 1999-2001

Phase 1: 1999: Teams in 20 Government secondary schools; 2000: 11 refunded for a second year; Partners: Department of Justice (Safer Cities and Shires),

Department of Education Focus on ‘Community Safety’

Phase 2: 2001: 37 teams in primary and secondary schools; Chosen by Department of Education Partners: Department of Justice (Crime Prevention),

Department of Education, VicHealth Focus on ‘Community Based Action

Page 13: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 13

Victorian State Program 1999-2001

Schools received: Small grants; Orientation meeting; Staff and student training (phase 1); Some local support and professional development; Student/teacher forums (phase 1); Manuals (phase 2).

Evaluations: Manual and case studies - phase 1; Implementation evaluation report - phase 1; Impact evaluation report - phase 2.

Page 14: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 14

Examples of Team Foci: (Phase 1, 1999-2000)

Altona SC: Truancy/Student Welfare and Discipline Policy Banksia SC: Safety Week - School and Community Issues Euroa SC: Safety House - Quit Heatherhill SC: Fire Safety Awareness Karingal Park SC: Nat’s Track - Driver Safety Kyneton SC: Skateboarding Melton SC: Youth Safety in Melton Ovens SC: Health Issues Expo - Community Mural Princes Hill SC: Inter-generational Links Wanganui Park SC: Trauma Teddies - Community walk Weeroona College: Road Safety Advertisement and Billboard

Page 15: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 15

Examples of Team Foci: (Phase 2, 2001)

Transition: students researched and produced a booklet and video about primary-secondary transition;

Road Safety: students attempted to get a crossing shifted or a roundabout installed;

Traffic safety: students made a mural within the school grounds to remind students about road crossing behaviour;

Bullying: students researched bullying in the school and community and prodded the school into action;

Community facilities: students investigated ways to get access to a community oval.

Page 16: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 16

Choosing a Topic Who chooses?:

1. School decides: This often defines which students; students then decide whether to, and how to.

2. Students decide: Students are recruited to a SAT, then carry out a ‘search process’ within constraints.

3. Community commissions: Arrange with community group to approach students; students then decide whether to and how to.

Importance of the topic: relevant, important, achievable - motivating!

Page 17: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 17

Examples of community commissions: Local Government challenges students to

complete youth component of local safety action plan

Consultant commissions students to review use of local park

Fire Brigade commissions students to investigate and act on causes of house fires

Community Residents’ Association commissions students to work on image of suburb

Page 18: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 18

Principles for collaboration: Early involvement: from the start Find out about groups and choose carefully Negotiate form and extent of involvement Joint planning Clear objectives for all Timelines: commitments and deadlines Plan for flexibility Acknowledge support

Page 19: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 19

Choosing the Students Open to all (eg a class group) Targeted (specific students chosen

for reasons of engagement, expertise, interest)

Inclusive (cross-section)

Importance of ensuring that otherwise marginalised students are able to participate

Page 20: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 20

School models

Ad hoc team of studentso Meet at lunchtime or withdrawn from classes

Part of the Student Councilo Formed as an ‘action team’ to work on Student Council issueso Reports to Student Council

Within an existing classo A curriculum approach of all or part of the classo Meets mandated curriculum requirements

As a ‘new’ classo Eg formed as an elective

Page 21: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 21

Forms of Credit:

Acknowledgement: Certification; Reference; Awards; Public recognition at

assemblies, in the newsletter etc;

Benefits; Congratulations.

Academic Credit: Within a subject report; As an extra report; Listing competencies.

Time: ‘Negotiated exemptions’; Assignment replacement; Timetabled space

Page 22: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 22

Principles: Students can make serious and

important decisions about issues that are important to them;

Students can do important and valuable things;

Important action can be taken as part of students’ learning in schools.

Page 23: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 23

In a Student Action Team:

Students: Decide on and ‘own’ the issue; Research and propose solutions; Act on their research/proposals; Reflect on what they have learnt.

Page 24: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 24

Some resources:

Firstly, Australian Youth Research Centre reports: Holdsworth, Stafford, Stokes and Tyler (2001): Student Action

Teams: an Evaluation 1999-2000. Working Paper 21, Australian Youth Research Centre: Melbourne

Holdsworth, Cahill and Smith (2003): Student Action Teams Phase 2 - 200102002: An Evaluation of Implementation and Impact. Research Report 22, Australian Youth Research Centre: Melbourne

Australian Youth Research CentreFaculty of Education, The University of Melbourne VIC 3010

Ph: 03 8344 9633; Fax: 03 8344 9632; [email protected]

Page 25: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 25

Some resources:

Secondly, the ‘How To’ Manual is available in South Australia and Victoria:

South Australian Office for Youth (2005): Student Action Teams: ‘How To’ Manual.

Victorian Department of Education and Training (2001): Learning in the Community: A ‘How To’ Manual for Student Action Teams. At:

www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/mys/engagement/studentactionteams.htm

Page 26: Student Action Teams An Introduction Roger Holdsworth Connect magazine and Australian Youth Research Centre r.holdsworth@unimelb.edu.au.

Student Action Teams 26

Some resources:

Finally, the documentation of practices continues:

Holdsworth (ed) (2006) Student Action Teams: Implementing Productive Practices in Primary and Secondary School Classrooms. Connect: Melbourne (forthcoming - approx. $30)

Connect (1979-present): journal supporting student participation: 12 Brooke Street, Northcote Vic 3070;

Annual subscription (6 issues): $30 (org); $20 (indiv)