Top Banner
Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet <[email protected]> TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the domain of Research and Education Networks: Past experience and Future prospective Dublin, 19 May 2014
11

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Apr 01, 2015

Download

Documents

Parker Lister
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development:

opportunities and challenges

Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet<[email protected]>

TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the domain of Research and Education Networks:

Past experience and Future prospective

Dublin, 19 May 2014

Page 2: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF2

A bit of history

2007-13: FP7 50 B€ + SF slowly entering RI(HU: ~20 M€ for e-RI)

2011-12: Horizon2020 (FP8!) / MFF preparations:”RI funding by SF only (!)”

Background: SF serves infrastructure developments(road, rail, energy … infocomm.)

2013-14: joint handling of R&D and RI – – harmonised FW + SF (ESIF) funding

~80 B€ Horizon2020 + ~100 B€ SF! (7 years)

Umbrella / framework: ERA

Page 3: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF3

2014-2020 status:

e-Infrastructure is key component of the European Research Area

(mobility, openness, RI, joint programs, global hub …)

Distributed / integrated resources in the ERA (humans, funds, tools, info)

Exceptional role of e-Infrastructures (glue):e-RI → RI → R → R&D → R&D&I → Competitiveness …

Widely recognised role, function, importance !

Page 4: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF4

Supportive treatment – chances of sustainability

e-Infrastructures: high priority (both EU & MS) ! (but still low R&D spending wrt. GDP levels)

Cost side: Maglaris model - 1:10:100(100M€ … 1B€ … 10 B€ / yr in RN!)(~20% CAPEX and ~80% OPEX: good assumption)

Financial resources:Horizon2020 + SF + MS funds + PPP + users

Scenarios: weakening – sustaining – strengthening

Sustainability: by strengthening only = fly or die (political / legal / technical + organisation + expertise + funding!)

Page 5: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF5

Some remarkable figures

MFF plan vs. Maglaris assumptions (0,1 : 1 : 10 B€ / yr)(business model needed: costs & resources levels / structure)Assumption here:

<2% Horizon2020, <20% MS, >80% SF, <2% PPP for RIMFF: SF / yr ~ 100 B€ / 7 ~ 15 B€ RI → 5 B€ e-RI → 1,5 B€ RN

e-RI / RI ratio (FP7): 0,57/1,72 B€ RN / e-RI ratio (FP7): 27% (HPC 37%, VRE 15%, Data 21%)

Compare 1,5 B€ / yr SF for RN with Maglaris’ 10 B€ / yr cost: SF covers 15% of full annual RN cost: close to ”optimum” (Optimum is around 20 / 80 % in case of 4-5 years life-span) (Difference to be covered by Horizon2020, MS, PPP funds)Practice: somewhat different but can be improved! (eg. NIIFI)

Page 6: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF6

The NIIFI case

NIIFI developments on SF basis in 2009-2012 ~ 20 M€ • DWDM on DF • HPC • Cloud • Storage • VC • middleware …

Page 7: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF7

The NIIFI case – the figures

NIIFI case: (~ 1 % of everything): → 150 M€ / yr SF for RI from MFF assumably available → ~50 M€ / yr for e-Infrastructure, ~15 M€ / yr for RN

NIIFI e-RI development projects on SF basis (e-RI !): Finished (2009-12): ~2 x 10 M€ (e-Infrastructure, Edu applications) Running (2014-16): ~2 x 5 M€ (HPC/1, Edu applications) Coming (2015-18): ~4 x 10 M€ (EduCloud, HPC/2, DCH, Edu apps…)

Maglaris model: NIIFI ~1M€ / yr GEANT → ~ 100 M€ / yr RN (i.e.VM on NIIFI / yr: 20 M€ CAPEX + 80 M€ OPEX in RN, 3x in e-RI)Successful period – but not yet exploiting the opportunities! (< 50 %!)

Fast widening/expansion is needed! (not only in Hungary)

Problem: expert workforce (developer, operator, broker, advisor …)

Page 8: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF8

Conclusions:

Funding e-RI development: no more a bottleneck !

NRENs should discuss:- how to best exploit the SF opportunities- how to convince / motivate MS governments

NRENs should consider: - Vertical & horizontal extension: increasing SF need!- Greening, innovation, PCP: also increasing SF need!

Specific issue wrt. EC rules on regional use of SF: higher priority of convergence regions Major issues needing NREN move: expert workforce + business model + CAPEX / OPEX issue

Page 9: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF9

Closing comments:

• Some figures may somewhat be incorrect• There are a lot of question marks (eg. MS attitudes)

but• Attractive opportunities – demanding challenges …• A new situation: no lack but abundance of funds• A promising future …

Are we ready?

Let’s try to do our best to exploit the SF option – for the benefit of the widest possible community !

Page 10: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF10

Explanatory addition wrt. NRENs’ opportunities:

A Summary Table of the annual rough averages [M€]:

* OPEX included** NRENs to estimate their share – and start planning / negotiating …

Maglaris Horizon2020 SF NIIFI

GÉANT 100* 40 1

RN 10 000* (40) 1500** 15

e-RI 120 5000** 50

RI 400 15000 150

Page 11: Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure development: opportunities and challenges Lajos Balint, NIIFI/Hungarnet TNC BoF on Using Structural Funds in the.

Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet

Structural Funds for e-Infrastructure developments – TNC’2014 BoF11

Last minute addition on the OPEX issue:

”Broadband State-Aid Rules …” (DG-CNECT / wik draft):

”[SF (ESIF)] … to cover (part of) the end users’ costs ofinstallation or purchase of broadband devices, or ofmonthly subscription … [de minimis: <66 K€ / user / yr]”

A tool for transition to a good business model?