STRESS RESPONSES IN LACTOBACILLI: IMPLICATIONS IN PROBIOTICS Diwas Pradhan Dairy Microbiology Division ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute April, 2012
Jan 22, 2018
STRESS RESPONSES IN LACTOBACILLI:
IMPLICATIONS IN PROBIOTICS
Diwas Pradhan
Dairy Microbiology Division
ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute
April, 2012
INTRODUCTION
• By definition,probiotics mustreach their targetsite alive toconfer a healthbenefit to thehost
• A plethora ofstresses needs tobe encountered
• LaCOG analyses employed to identify a set of LAB genes associated withvarious stress responses.
• HrcA involved in the control of the heat-shock protein expression
• Heat-shock proteins commonly under HrcA control and performingchaperonin-like functions (GroELS, DnaJK, GrpE) are universallyconserved.
• The involvement of CtsR in the regulation of class III stress proteins,including the Clp proteases and related functions.
• The corresponding Clp proteases appear to be universally present inthese LAB genomes.
• Majority of stress-tolerance genes are conserved among strains of aparticular species
• strain-specific survival capacities depend on their relative levels of expressionrather than their presence or absence.
Lactic Acid Bacteria Genomics
• The major HSPs:
o The classical chaperones DnaK, GroEL, and GroES (participate
in protein folding, protein translocation, and possibly higher-
order protein assembly)
o The Clp family of proteins (disposing heat damaged proteins)
play an indispensable role in protein quality
o Regulated by HrcA and CtsR regulon
• HtrA, FtsH, sHSPs, RecA, and Other Important Factors
Responses to Heat Stress
Varmanen, P. and Savijoki, K., 2011
• A number of CSPs are induced
• Function as transcriptional and translational regulators
• Also act as molecular chaperones
• Three csp genes (cspL, cspC, and cspP) identified inLactobacillus plantarum NC8. Overproduction causes distinctphenotypic effects
• CspL overproduction transiently alleviated the cold-shock impairmentof growth
• CspP overproduction enhanced the cryotolerance
• CspC overproduction improves growth adaptation at optimaltemperatures
Responses to Cold Stress
Capozzi, V., 2011
• Also induced heat-responsive genes sHSPsuggesting a cross-talk between the heat-and cold-stress responses
• An increase in C16:0 and C18:2 fatty acids inLactobacillus acidophilus grown at lowtemperature
Responses to Cold Stress
Capozzi, V., 2011
Cold-shock Response In Bacillus subtilis
• Biological modifications
related to temperature
perception and signal
transduction (red)
• Membrane adaptation
(yellow)
• Nucleoid structure and
transcription (blue)
• CSPs and translation
apparatus (green)
• Metabolism, protein
folding, and cell
differentiation (violet)
• Oxygen, Superoxide, Hydrogen Peroxide and theHydroxyl Radical(HO˙)
• SOD, thioredoxin reductase, peroxidase, glutathionereductase and RecA
• Incorporation of high concentrations of manganeseby Lb. plantarum
• SOD or manganese produce H2O2 from O2˙−.
Responses to Oxidative Stress
Cesselin, B., et al., 2011
Lb. plantarum, jonsohnii and casei
• Encodes cydABCD genes.
• Require heme and a menaquinone to activate respiration metabolism
A Respiratory Chain In LAB
• Activity and pH optima of the proton translocating
(H)-ATPase
• Acid tolerance response(ATR)
a. Decrease fluidity of CM- increase the concentration of saturated FAs or cyclopropane FA(C19:0)
b. Saturated to unsaturated FAs ratio- from 0.4 to 4.9
• Malate and Histidine contribute to acid adaptation
• His contributes to intracellular buffering
Acid stress
Broadbent, J. R., et. al., 2010
• Two-component regulatory systems (2CRS) andABC-type oligopeptide transport proteins
– (Opp) known to function as sensors for environmental change
• Differential expression of transposase genes
• Metabolism, Information storage, processing and Cellular processes genes were significantly altered
Acid stress
• Self-Immunity: Immunity proteins on their cytoplasmicmembrane for protection against the producedbacteriocin.
• NisI and SpaI- lipoproteins anchored to the membrane surfacevia a lipid-modified N-terminal cysteine residue.
• ABC transporter(LanFEG)
• The two-component systems (TCSs) and extracellularsigma factors are involved in the intensive action towardcell wall active antibiotics.
Responses to Bacteriocins and Other Antimicrobials
Asaduzzaman, S. M. and Sonomoto, K., 2011
• Carbohydrate exhaustion ushers LAB into the NC state• Resuscitation has not been demonstrated yet.
• Switch to the catabolism of amino acids usingaminotransferases (ATases)
• Many of the regulatory or quorum-sensing molecules are notproduced.• The accumulation of compatible molecules enables cellular stability
• Loss of the ability to produce colonies• Accompanied by the production of Met and Ser into the medium
Responses to Starvation
Weimer, B. C., 2011
• Majority of analyses have generally focused on
one particular stress
• Need for network reconstruction based on
multiple stress-induced transcriptome profiles
• Not been reported for LAB to date
• Will help reveal the regulatory networks and
complete regulons involved.
Assessment of Multiple Stress Responses
and Regulatory Network Reconstruction
Bron, P. A., 2011
1. In Vitro approaches to identify RobustnessGenes in Lactic Acid Bacteria
• Comparative Genomic Hybridization
• DNA microarray technology
2. In Vivo Expression Technology
Functional Genomics Approaches to Unravel Lactic Acid Bacteria Stress
Responses
Bron, P. A. et. al., 2011
• The CGH approach employsone-directional comparisonof gene-content profiles perstrain using genome widemicroarrays that aredesigned on the basis of thegenome of a single strain.
• Enables the construction ofhigh-resolution genomewide presence-absencepatterns for each of thestrains that is analyzed.
Comparative Genomic
Hybridization
genome sequence of a robust strain
DNA of a robust strain
DNA of the strain
Sequence present in both (grey)Sequence present in robust strain but normal strain (black)
19
Widely used technologyto identify several of the(conserved) geneticfactors regulated duringstress imposed on LAB
DNA microarray technology
• Powerful method thatallow the genomewide identification ofin vivo induced (ivi)promoters and theircorresponding genesutilizing a promotertrapping system.
In Vivo Expression
Technology(IVET)
Rediers, H. et al., 2005
Pregenomics Approaches
Additives
Pre-adaptation
Cross-Protection
Postgenomics Strategies
Overexpression of Stress Regulon Members by Genetic
Modification
Targeted Mutagenesis of Stress Regulators
Fermentation-Enhanced Probiotic Function
Improving Robustness
Bron, P. A., et. al., 2011
ADDITIVES
A straightforward way to improve stress response
Glucose, fructose, Tween-80, betaine, gum acacia etc.
PREADAPTATIONLAB have developed several conserved stress
responsesThe CtsR and HrcA regulators
Overlap in different stress regulons
Overexpression of Stress Regulon Membersby Genetic Modification
Alteration of expression levels ofgenes encoding stress regulon members or regulatorsprior to stress exposure
Targeted Mutagenesis of Stress Regulators
Manipulation of complete stress regulons by targeting the canonical stress regulator CtsR
• Exploits stress response systems of pathogenic bacteria.
• Heterologous expression of BetL from L. monocytogenes in
the Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118 resulted in a strain with
improved resistance to numerous stresses.
• A novel bile resistance mechanism- BilE
1. Operates by excluding bile from the cell
2. Not many homologues of the bilE operon have been identified in
any of the genomes of the probiotic organisms
Pathobiotechnology
Mills, S., et. al., 2011
Stress in the Context of Microbial Communities
Stress and the Cell Cycle
Stress and DNADamage Control
Stress-Induced Mutagenesis
Stress in the Context of the Single Cell
Sensing and Signaling Stress
Papadimitriou, K., and Kok, J., 2011
The ability of probiotic bacteria to survive the harshenvironments has been a major factor in their selectioncriteria.
Induction of the probiotic stress response through pre-adaptation strategies- not always successful.
Developing a molecular toolbox (throughpathobiotechnology, targeting indigenous defensestrategies), should ensure that the most functionallyactive strains can be confidently selected for probioticdevelopment.
CONCLUSIONS
Apprehensions on the use of Genetically Modifiedorganisms.
Studies which evaluate the safety of engineeredprobiotics are crucial if the technology is to gainacceptance.
In this way next-generation probiotic cultures will bebetter equipped to face technological andgastrointestinal challenges as well as meeting medicaldemands
Cont.